On the Three C's. The 3Cs of Convenience, Conversion, and Convulsion. Wolf vs Dog. Negro vs White Man. Savage and Slavish. Civilization and Its Costs.

On Convenience, Conversion, and Convulsion.

Some people have noted that blacks have achieved least in the creation of civilization, complex societies, and high culture. And yet, maybe in a certain sense, blacks could take pride in not having been able to create Wakandas. After all, for every gain, there is a loss. And for every loss, there is a gain.

To create civilization, the slavish genes have to outnumber the savage genes. Obviously, slavish dogs are easier to control and handle than wolves. And yet, wolves are freer, wilder, and more robust. Dogs are more useful, more cooperative, and gentler, but they are comparatively wussier creatures than wolves.

The races that created civilization needed to be more slavish. Maybe natural forces, such as extreme cold that necessitated closer cooperation and delaying of gratification, made them more slavish, and then perhaps, 'civilizational' factors compounded the slavishness by weeding out the savage genes by execution or exile. So, as a community, such people could achieve more collectively, but this came at the cost of individual savage gene that was more robust, rambunctious, colorful, exuberant, and etc.

It’s like Chinese and Japanese built high civilizations, but they regarded by Modern Pop Cultural standards as colorless, mostly skin-and-bones, timid & sheepish, and not very good at singing, dancing, and sports. They are regarded as akin to dickless space aliens who appear at the end of CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND. The natives of Mexico may have built the great city of Tenochtitlan, but their descendants are deemed a dull, timid, and sheepish bunch. In order for them to have built civilization, they had to be have been more slavish than savage. (Granted, slave-made complex civilizations could carry out savage deeds like human sacrifice, but that's not the kind of savagery we are talking about. Savagery in our context means a primitive level of human existence and culture.)

Now, compare the wolfish Mongols with the doggish Chinese. Mongols, by Asian standards, are big & robust and have barbarian souls. They don’t like to take shit from anyone. They preferred to sack and loot other civilizations than build their own, but there’ something vital about their character, duly noted in the novel and movie WOLF TOTEM by a Chinese author who lamented that his Han tribe, in building civilization and establishing order, lost something vital and natural that the Mongols still possessed. For sure, Mongols in Sumo summarily bounce Japanese guys off the 'dojo' like ping pong balls. Though both Mongol and Japanese societies were warrior-centered, Mongols prized the robust and hale rider-hunter who took charge of things. In contrast, samurai favored the obedient subordinate and ruthlessly executed those who exhibited independent streaks; thus, a vital element of human nature was weeded out of the Japanese gene pool. This made the Japanese more cooperative and mindful of others, but it also made them duller and more neurotic. This is why so many Japanese are like the character Yohei in SEVEN SAMURAI.

Pitiful Yohei, the typical Japanese Male.

Because Negroes failed to develop civilization, they came to be subjugated by other races with superior organization, technology, and culture. And they became slaves in Arabia and the New World. But even if historical and economic circumstances made them more likely to be slaves, their nature was less suited for slavery(at least in a complex order). Blacks have more savage genes than slavish genes. From a modern social perspective, the black savage gene has been problematic because it made too many Negroes run wild and act like lunatics. But countless people also find it vibrant, exciting, manly, sexy, badass, and etc. Look at the worldwide success of rap music, reggae, and other black-infected pop music. And blacks have dominated so many of the world's most popular sports. No one watches Chinese sports outside China, but many millions of Chinese love to watch the NBA where big ass Negroes dunk the balls while being cheered by blonde women cheerleaders who now salivate over big muscular Negroes who be seen as the superior males.

Among all the arts, music is the most spontaneous and powerful, and blacks have been, pound for pound, the most dominant force in pop music in the 20th century with their contribution to or invention of blues, jazz, rock n roll, soul, reggae, rap, and etc. Such music arose from the savage genes, and it turns a lot of people on. Even though so-called 'black music' of the 20th century would not exist without white influence, input, and instruments, one could argue that the core energy is the black fire. It's like gasoline is useless without an engine, wheels, and other parts of the car, but it is the fuel that fires up the engine. So, even though something like Rock music owes a great deal to white contribution, much of its raw fuel is black coal. White influence gave it structure and style, but the core energy of beat, rhythm, and soaring/scouring vocals owes to something particular to blacks. (Similarly, much of the power in classical music owes to the Germanic soul that added an especially potent mix to the musical form invented by others.) In contrast, the world community is far less interested in the slavish-genes-music of, say, Mexicans or Chinese. Now, a musicologist could argue that there are no objective standards by which to argue that some music is 'better' than others. Also, popular doesn't necessarily mean better. Fast food is more popular than fancy food, but is it better? TRANSFORMERS made more money than worthier films, but it's certainly not better. And yet, there have been lots of great black music(and white rock fueled by black coal) that managed to be both popular and inspired, and that surely counts for something. As for rap, even though people like myself detest it as attitude and expression, there is no denying its appeal as a means of forceful expression that many find infectious.

So, in some ways, blacks may take pride in not having been able to build the Pyramids of Egypt -- most Ancient Egyptians were not black-black -- and the Great Wall of China. They were too independent-willed, too 'badass', and too wild to be subjugated into hauling bricks to build stuff for oppressive kings and queens. They preferred to run wild & free and chuck spears at hippos and then run from hippos when hippos had enough of the Negroes acting wild and funky.

For every gain, there’s a loss. Chinese may have built a great civilization, but look how scrawny they became. Non-Asian women feel no excitement about Chinese men, and just about any good-looking Chinese woman in the US would rather marry anyone but the men of her own race. Asian women are the Story of the Horniness of Women with Hots for Bigger/Tougher warriors. http://dailybruin.com/2012/11/29/rally-responds-to-incidents-of-hate-speech_1129_1129/ Despite the matter of Asians having higher IQ than blacks, if a white guy were presented with a chance to become a Negro or a yellow, he would likely prefer to be Long Dong Silver than Wong Dong Lee. Consider the first part of the animation movie HEAVY METAL where a white guy enters the body of a black guy and turns into a warrior-stud who humps white women. It was cuck-fantasy before cuckery took off. And all those white college boys cheer for black athletes as demigods that they wish to be. And the movie GET OUT is about how Liberal Whites actually see blacks as so superior that they want to kill blacks to take over black bodies. While whites may feel that Asian-ness is preferable on the cerebral level, most people's immediate responses tend to be visceral than intellectual. One can admire an athlete right away, whereas it takes time to appreciate a writer, scientist, or an artist. A woman can be turned on by a tough guy right away, whereas it takes time for a woman to appreciate an unexciting guy who happens to have good qualities as friend and companion. It's the same with men in how they react to women. Any man can look at a 'sexy babe' and be turned on immediately, but it will take some time to appreciate a homely woman who happens to have good qualities.

Animation Movie HEAVY METAL where a white boy enters a body of a black guy to hump white women.

Humanity operates, for good or ill, according to three main modalities: Convenience, Conversion, and Convulsion.

Civilization greatly improved the means of Convenience, and this has been especially true of the West(that came to change the Rest). Think of all the great Western scientists and techno-inventors who created stuff like cars, refrigerators, airplanes, machines, toilets, and etc, etc, that made life so much easier, more comfortable, and more convenient. We owe so much to such individuals, but how come they are almost invisible to us? Because the purpose of convenience is to serve us and make us forget it even exists. We don’t think about the technology of plumbing every time we use the faucet to drink water or flush the toilet. We are very glad to have such things, and they make life easier. But they don’t turn us on. They make life more bearable but not more pleasurable. They lessen the pain but don't intensify the pleasure. Once they've become a part of our lives, we really notice them ONLY WHEN they malfunction or are denied to us. Who thinks about water or electricity except when the service fails?
Also, they don't move us sensually or emotionally. Once the air conditioner is on, we hardly think about it or respond to it, any more than we think about the very oxygen we breathe, essential as it is. Elevators are useful but we don’t get excited about being inside one. Western civilization has been the king of convenience, but how many white folks are reading books about past inventors to get their jollies? Think of the guy who invented modern textile technology. He did something very great. But I don’t know his name and likely neither do you. Machines are essential for they exist to serve us and make life more convenient. And convenience is very very nice, even essential, but it’s utilitarian, not 'orgasmic'.

Then there is the matter of Conversion. It comes alive in the realm of ideas and emotions, the mind and heart. Religions and ideologies are 'conversionary'. Religions and ideology may require time and patience for us to appreciate. To truly understand Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Taoism, or whatever, we have to calm & control ourselves and do some intense reading & contemplating. And there is the need for prayer and meditation. Thus, we gain inspiration and the passion to serve something higher and greater than ourselves.
To understand ideologies, we have to attend meetings, read certain texts, and join discussions. In the end, religions or ideologies may be very fulfilling and transforming. They may provide us with the meaning of life, a sense of truth and righteousness, and the possibility of redemption and salvation. They make us realize that there’s a higher meaning to life, i.e. life isn’t just about material well-being but about spiritual, moral, and/or intellectual pursuit of truth.
The Middle East, Asia, and Europe achieved great things in 'conversionarity'. Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, Greek philosophy, Confucianism, and many schools of thoughts arose from those civilizations. Conversionary stuff may not make life easier in the physical/literal sense -- as the instruments of convenience do -- , but they are compelling because they imbue us with a sense of truth and meaning. And this is why some Muslims in the West still cling to their Old Faiteh. Sure, the Modern West offers a great deal in terms of convenience -- medicine, technology, and etc -- , but it’s not very meaningful to worship a refrigerator, ponder the significance of carburetors, or meditate on the truth of toilets. People find meaning by thinking about God, myths, high art, philosophy(ultimate meaning of life), history, moral progress, and etc.

When it came to matters of Convenience and Conversion, black African produced next to nothing. No great science/technology/invention. No great religion, philosophy, ideology, or school of thought.

But then, there is the power of Convulsion. Human eyes, ears, tongue, genitalia, and certain parts of the skin are all erogenous-like zones. Convenience makes the body comfortable. Conversion makes hearts and minds feel meaningful. But it’s convulsion that makes the erogenous-like senses explode like Juicy Fruit gum and go crazy.


Convenience is like a perfect chair that makes the ass comfortable. Conversion is the book one holds while sitting on the chair. In contrast, convulsion may not offer any long-term utility or any deep meaning, but it provides intense explosions of pleasure. It’s like a vibrator-dildo up a nympho’s pooter(though some might call it cooter).

Now, we could argue that humanity should be wiser and favor convenience and conversion over convulsion, but the power of pleasure(especially in our electronically-connected world overflowing with leisure) is so powerful for a lot of people that they’ve come to favor convulsion over all else. It’s like if you give cocaine to a monkey, it will just want more doses. It’s like once a boy or girl experiences orgasm, he or she has to look for more and more. It’s like once young ones listen to pop music, they don’t wanna do anything else but listen to more. It’s like sports addicts are crazy about sports 24/7. It's no wonder that Soma and Feelies are so crucial to the world of Aldous Huxley's BRAVE NEW WORLD. The Power figured that, instead of maintaining order through strict repression and regimen, people could be better-managed by making them carry out certain tasks in allotted roles for routine rewards of intense pleasure.

It is in the areas of convulsion that blacks pose the greatest threat to the white race. Though convulsion may be the opposite of convenience and conversion, paradoxically the power of convulsion became magnified because of the success of convenience and conversion. The Western triumph in convenience led to huge technological advances. As people in the West have all the basic amenities and own TVs/stereos/computers, their minds are barely fixated on convenience(even as their lives owe so much to it). In the 19th century, white farmers struggled to eke out a living. They had to grow food, and their minds were occupied with making life easier by gaining greater convenience with improved methods of agriculture and tool-making. Also, as there were no radios, TV, and stereos, fun and pleasure amounted to local folk dances and get-togethers where parents and preachers kept a watchful eye on the young ones(who had to grow fast into adulthood to take on backbreaking labor). And as morality and spirituality of Conversion guided society, sexuality was carefully regulated.

But today, we have enough food and water. We don’t worry about disease and cold. Also, religion has faded due to science, wealth, and education. And grand ideologies such as Marxism have lost their appeal in a world with far less need, one where even poor people get fat. If anything, 'idology'(the politics of idolatry) has supplanted ideology. Our social mores are more libertarian and freewheeling and hedonistic. So, people take basic necessities for granted and instead seek wild/intense pleasure through sports, music, movies, TV, porn, dating-services(aka hookups), and free sex.

Conversion also paved the way for the rise of convulsion. How? Because conversion-dialectic led to the emergence of the kind of political/social/moral philosophies that best served to create and maintain modern societies of peace, law, and order. Once such socio-economic-political success was achieved, people began to take ideas for granted. After all, how many people regularly read the documents of the Founding Fathers? How many read up on the history of advancement of law and ethics from Roman times to the present? Though some people do find intellectual fulfillment in reading and learning, most people don’t much care about ideas as long as life is pretty good for them. What passed for ‘ideas’ since the 'End of History' has been stuff like WWG(world war gay) and WWT(world war tranny).

But one thing people are mad about is pleasure and more pleasure. If you’re dying of thirst, a glass of water will suffice as pleasure, mainly to overcome the pain of thirst. But if you have all the water in the world, you want something like an ice cold beer or soda pop with the fizzle.

Since the success of the Modern West put people’s minds off convenience and ideas -- as their utility is taken for granted -- , people are looking for more and more pleasure. People on a cruise ship don't think about the engines, steering, plumbing, and myriad other things that make the trip possible. They are fixated on fun. Likewise, how many people watching a movie think about the machinery of film-making and film-projection? They are just fixated on the fun images on screen. How many people think about how their smart-phones work and what went into them in terms of ingenuity and innovation? They just want to trade 'butt pics' and 'dick pics'.

And it is in the area of convulsion that Negroes are beginning to take over.

Look at sports. Muscled Negroes dominate. White girls cheer for black studs and line up to have sex with Mandingos who give them the biggest orgasms. White boys in the stands cheer for black athletes like crazy. The emotional response of white male fans to black athletics is almost 'orgasmic'. White boys turn quasi-homo in their worship of black muscle and mastery on the field. They act like white cheerleaders. They scream their heads off like they’re having orgasms all over their bodies.

And consider the worldwide potency of rap music. Black guys sing about how badass they be, about how white girls worship their muscle and big dongs. And white girls have conniptions listening to that stuff. They ‘twerk’ their asses to rap as if they’re mounting big Negroes. And white boys listen to that stuff too and get quasi-homo jollies in their worship of black toughness and cool thug attitude. White rock critics sing hosannas to Kanye West. White guys try to emulate black rappers. White homo guys look for black guys to pump them in the ass.

Intense sexual pleasure are found through feelings of conquest or feelings of submission. White girls and white guys find great orgasmic pleasure in submitting to the Negro as Nature's Master(and in vicariously ‘sharing’ the conquest by the Negroes). There was even an article in DETAILS mag about how white elites are having 'mandingoes' hump their wives on their own beds. White wives must have the big Negro, and white guys can get off only by submission fantasies before black guys as the superior race over wussy whites. This has now caught on in Japan, with clubs where small Japanese men gather to see big black Americans hump Japanese women who, having caught jungle fever, are having more kids with black men and producing offspring who dominate Japanese sports and defeat weaker yellow guys.

The power of convulsion is huge in the current Globo-Homo-Afro-Shlomo order. It’s like WUTHERING HEIGHTS where some hussy runs off with Heathcliff. Or Kate Chopin's THE AWAKENING which I haven’t read but I think it’s about some white woman getting turned on by a mulatto. Or Jane Campion’s silly PIANO where some white hussy goes off with some white guy who’s gone native and acts the Maori warrior. She feels ‘liberated’ by sexually submitting to the ‘savage’.

We may admire Japanese contribution to the technology of convenience, but in the area of convulsion, Japan fails at least in its male-dom. East Asians make the bulk of world electronics, but what most people watch through TV, computer, and smartphone screens are whites and blacks than Asians(who are more likely to be depicted in cartoon form in anime or manga). Japanese males are seen as a bunch of 'scrawns'. Hard-working drones who make good radios but who count for zero in convulsion factor. On the other hand, Japanese women may offer some convulsion goodies since men prefer women who are feminine, and it seems men all over the world have fantasies about me-so-horny mama-sans.

Negroes achieved zero in convenience and conversion, but they seem to be masters of convulsion. And yet, this triumph of the Negro has been made possible by Western triumph in convenience and convulsion. Western invention of electronics, TV, stereo, and etc., made black music accessible in the bed room of every white boy and white girl. Western moral-intellectual development led to the feelings of ‘white guilt’, and MLK-ology is the reigning ideology of White folks. And of course, it was the white-made transport systems and economies of scale that led to whites going to Africa AND blacks coming to the West. Without the triumph of convenience, whites would have remained in the white world, and blacks would remained in the black world.

So, even though blacks are only really good at thuggery, humpery, and jiveassery, their power in these areas have been magnified as pleasure-drugs all over the globe through Western media. And ease of travel have sent Negroes all over the world to hump women of all color.

Pleasure may be fleeting, but it is intense(just look at the loonies who totally lose their minds during Santana’s ‘Soul Sacrifice’ in WOODSTOCK), which is why some druggies are hopeless. Also, there is an endless barrage of pleasure-inducing sounds and images via countless devices that service pop culture. Junkies may know that the drugs that give them convulsions are destroying them, but they are so addicted to the pleasure, they gotta have more and more and more. It’s like the orgasmo-orb in Woody Allen’s SLEEPER.


Just look at the state of UK today. You still have elites who are well-mannered, well-read, and well-spoken(though all seem to be committed to Diversity and Vulgarization of Society), but the main cultural interest now revolves around convulsion, especially in relation to the Negro. Andrew Sullivan the homo may find meaning in books and surely appreciates modern conveniences(created by so many white scientists and inventors), but where does he find the greatest pleasure in life? By having some muscled big-donged Negro pump him in the ass. Milo shares that excitement as he's 'married' to a homo-Negro. That pretty much sums up the essence of what the British elites stand for nowadays.


Today, Jews control much of the Convenience industry(especially in high tech) and the Conversion industry(academia, media, publishing, etc). Control of sectors like Silicon valley and finance technology gives Jews tremendous amount of wealth. And with that money, they’ve bought up all the media and funded much of the academia. And they use their control over conversion-spheres to promote ‘white guilt’ as the main moral-spiritual 'idology' of the age.

And as Jews own much of sports, media, TV, music, and porn, they work in cahoots with Negroes to push the Negro dope or Negrope on white junkies who are totally addicted to orgasmic convulsions from sports, rap music, porn, and even watching one’s own wives humped by Negroes.

So, as we look to the future, the issue is no longer a matter of which people created the greatest civilizations but which people produce the biggest convulsions for humanity?

Though non-blacks created the greatest civilizations, the price they had to pay was the rise of slavish genes over savage genes. The higher degree of slavishness among whites, Near Easterners, Hindus, and yellows enabled them to build bigger cities and get along better and obey orders. But they also grew wussier, wimpier, doglike, Dan-Quayle-like, and David-Cameron-like. Without inspired leadership from above, most non-blacks fear to step forward and take action. In the past, British elites led the British masses in defense and aggression. Today, with the elites have been brainwashed by Jewish Conversion and/or addicted to Negro Convulsion, they no longer rouse up the British masses for racial solidarity and national power. Your average Briton, left to his own devices, would rather accept national suicide than give offense to others with 'nasty views' such as 'racism'. His instincts are more slavish than savage.

Just like Japanese built high civilization but get bumped around by bigger & tougher Mongols(who excite Japanese ladies who also run around Yokohama looking for Negro studs) in the Sumo 'dojo', white folks built greater civilization but at the cost of becoming dweebier and doglike, at least when compared to blacks.

Even though the dweeby and doggish naturally fear the wolfish and savage, they are also turned on by displays of wolfish or pitbull-ish prowess. It’s like dogs are more impressed by wolves than vice versa, and female dogs will could well have bigger orgasmic convulsions with male wolves... and in time male dogs will find their jollies as quasi-homo bitches of male wolves. Looking forward to the future of wolfish Negro males and doggish white males?

Jews have often said "My Jewish Relatives Died in the Holocaust" — We must ask, "What Else Did Your Jewish Relatives Do?" — Let’s Consider the Historical Record

Margaret Hodge, the Vile Vicious Jewess: "My relatives were murdered in the gas chamber’: Jewish Labour MP defends calling Corbyn a ‘f***ing anti-Semite" 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/07/28/labours-gas-chamber-blues-pink-berets-vs-fing-anti-semites/

The above is a very instructive article about the nature of Jewish Power, Duplicity, and Mendacity in the UK, but the article could apply to just about any nation in which Ashkenazi Jews have gained prominence. As a more self-aware Jew Yossi Sarid has said, “In these very moments, the protocols are being rewritten. Rich Jews are writing them in their own handwriting. They, in their wealth, are confirming with their own signatures what anti-Semites used to slander them with in days gone by: We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress, and the congressmen are nothing but marionettes who do our will. If they don’t understand our words, they’ll understand our threats. And if in the past, we ran the show from behind the scenes, now we’re doing it openly, from center stage. And if you forget our donations, the wellspring will run dry.” For much of my life, I thought ‘antisemitism’ was mostly a canard, and to be sure, there have been many anti-Jewish cranks and fantasists over the years. But upon observing Jewish Power in the here-and-now all around the world, I’ve been led to conclude that, all said and done, the ‘anti-Semites’ tended to be more right than wrong. They understood the character of Jewish Psychology and Culture and why Jews act the way they do. As these ethnic patterns have re-emerged over and over regardless of ideology — Jewish Leftists or Jewish Rights are equally subversive of the essential interests of non-Jewish populations — , critics and enemies of Jewish Power through the ages were more about facts than fantasy. And in a way, precisely because Jews have gained dominance in the US, the most powerful nation on Earth, and can’t restrain their chutzpah with too-much-money-and-power, more and more people everyday are waking up to the toxic impacts of Jewish arrogance, greed, venality, hatred, contempt, and supremacism. (That is precisely why Jews now HATE FREE SPEECH. Any honest discussion in an open forum will expose the ugly and pathological nature of Current Jewish Power. This is why Jews rig all search engines and platforms to favor Jew-concocted narratives. This is why Jews dumb-down and infantilize even elite culture because a thinking people who ask hard questions will come to see Jewish Power for what it is. Better for Jewish Power to turn Elites into Homo-Worshipers who stick with Jewish Power because it is seen as most homo-friendly.) It seems all the more perverse and weird because these Judeo-Nazis still(albeit increasingly comically) invoke the Shoah to cover up for their utter vileness. It’s like Madeleine Albright, the butcher of Iraq, giving us sermons about the dangers of ‘fascism’ taking over the US. These Jews got some nerves.


Anyway, one oft-repeated shtick pulled by Jews is to remind people that their RELATIVES died in the Shoah or were ‘Holocaust Survivors’, a term that has become nearly meaningless as it could apply to just about any Jew who lived in areas under German control during the war. When most people hear ‘Holocaust Survivor’, they think of people like in SCHINDLER’S LIST, men, women, and children who managed to make it out alive of Nazi Concentration Camps. But the term is so broadly defined that it could mean even Jews who lived with relative comfort in areas of German Occupation. While we can acknowledge that all Jews under German Occupation lived under severe duress and anxiety, it’s ridiculous to label as ‘Holocaust Survivor’ someone who was not even in the notorious Labor or Death Camps devised by the Nazis. In some nations, where the hunt for Jews was so extensive, such as in Poland and Hungary, one could argue that the entire Jewish population there were Holocaust Survivors. But the term becomes a stretch in nations where the great majority of Jews not only survived, not least because the local population resisted collaboration with the Germans. Even in Occupied France where Collaboration was commonplace, the fact is 75% of French Jews managed to survive the war.

Anyway, when Jews say "My relatives survived or died in the Holocaust", it gives a very skewed view of history. It implicitly surveys the world where Jews have been nothing but innocent victims of malevolent forces. It ignores context and other narratives. It’s like Japanese saying "My relatives survived Hiroshima or Nagasaki or Tokyo firebombing" while totally ignoring what their OTHER relatives may have done in China, Indonesia, and against the US naval fleet in Pearl Harbor. While many ‘innocent’ or ‘civilian’ Japanese were cruelly killed in WWII at the hands of the US Air Force, there was ANOTHER side to Japan’s role in the war. Japan was also an imperialist aggressor that visited unimaginable horrors upon China, Philippines, Indonesia, and etc. Also, Japan attacked the US first. So, while a Japanese wouldn’t be wrong to say that he or she knows relatives who were cruelly killed in the war, it’s also probably true that he or she has relatives who took part in the horrific Japanese Imperialist aggressions against other nations. He or she has relatives who were victims but also those who were villains(and in some cases, people can be villains and victims at the same time; surely Japanese colonists who were attacked by Chinese patriots were both villains[as imperialist migrants] and victims[of local acts of terror]).

While it may well be true that many Jews can claim to know relatives who were killed in the Holocaust or barely survived it, it’s no less true that many Jews have relatives who took part in some of the great crimes of the 20th century. When Jews say, "My relatives died in the Holocaust", we need to ask them, "What did your relatives do in Soviet Union? How many Christian Slavs did they kill? How many Christian Churches did they smash?" It’s now largely agreed that in the first two decades of Soviet Rule, close to 10 million people perished. Before Nazi Germany edged out the Soviet Union in industrial slaughter, the USSR was the international kingpin when it came to mass mayhem and destruction. And Jewish Bolsheviks played a huge role in the use of terror, slavery, and execution to bring about this so-called Workers’ Paradise. Many Jews took part in this State ruled by Fear and Terror. Many Jews were directly involved in the running of this state at the highest levels. But there were also many Jews in the West who indirectly aided the Soviet project, totally oblivious and indifferent to the death and destruction caused by Soviet Jews on the Slavic and other populations. Not only did millions die of starvation in Ukraine, but it’s estimated that a quarter of the population perished in Kazakhstan. And even for ones who didn’t die, there was the culture of tyranny and conformism, of total censorship and obedience, perhaps most powerfully satirized by George Orwell in 1984. If Soviet Jews in the USSR were controlling the media to spread propaganda to justify the Terror, Western Jews in the media did their best to deny that the Terror was even taking place. When millions of Slavic peasants were dying in the Great Famine, the great majority of Jews in the USSR and the West felt NOTHING. No pity, no heartache, no remorse. Indeed, Jews began to notice something wrong only with the Great Purge that targeted Soviet intellectuals and commissars. The Great Famine that killed millions had been about dirty goy peasants, so good riddance to them, thought the Jews. But the Great Purge targeted the class in which Jews were prominent. Even though the Great Purge, in killing around 450,000, was far less deadly than the Great Famine, it was the first time Jews began to wonder about the wisdom of the Soviet system. (But then, it’s always "Is it good for the Jews?" when it comes to Jewish ‘ethics’. We saw the same pattern in the US. For the longest time, Americans were led to believe that the Red Scare was the worst violation of civil liberties in the US when, in fact, it only led to the blacklisting of some Hollywood writers and folk singers for a few yrs. In contrast, the ‘internment’ of Japanese-in-America led to dispossession and relocation of over 100,000 people. So, why did the Jew-run media and academia care more about the victims of the Red Scare? It affected areas in which Jews were prominent.) As it turned out, the Great Purge didn’t end Jewish Power in the USSR. While Stalin removed most Jews from the highest echelons of power, many Jews(way disproportionate to their overall population) remained in the Soviet apparatus and continued to serve Stalin in his use of terror and mass executions to deal with ‘class enemies’.

At any rate, we need to stop playing the Jewish Game. When Jews bitch and whine ever so predictably, "My relatives blah blah blah...", we need to counter with the question, "What did your relatives do as commissars in the Soviet Union? What did your relatives do as Zionist Imperialists who wiped Palestine off the map?" And don’t let Jews bait you about ‘white racism’. Jews played a huge role in the Atlantic Slave Trade. And Jewish merchants sold guns to whites to kill Indians with on the Western frontier. So, if whites are guilty of American Slavery and American Genocide, so are the Jews. Also, so much of Western Imperialism was funded by Jewish bankers. And wherever whites conquered, Jews followed and profited. When the British Empire made inroads into China, the Jews were there to peddle opium to the Chinese. And in recent times, you bet that many relatives of Jews were involved in promoting Wars for Israel via the academia, media, Deep State, and finance. If you know a Jew, he will likely have Jewish relatives who took part in the Nakba pogroms, the Zionist occupation of West Bank, Neocon Wars for Israel(that killed close to a million people and reduced millions more to ‘refugee’ status), Jewish Rape of Russia in the 1990s that destroyed millions of lives, global White Slavery(in which Jews cajole mostly poor Slavic women into becoming sex slaves), Jewish control of Porn(where mostly white women are turned into ‘cumbuckets’ and sex meat for Negro men), and Cuck-castration of white men that has gelded white males into a bunch of wussy-pussified ‘white boys’ who suck up to Negroes who beat them up and hump their women. So, whenever some smarmy Jew bleats about "my relative blah blah Holocaust blah blah", you ask him about his OTHER relatives and what role they played in Soviet terror, Rape of Russia, Nakba pogroms, Opium trade, Slave trade, funding of imperialism, Wall Street mass theft, Las Vegas robbery, Opioid epidemic, pornification of society, cuck-castration of whites into wussy-boys who don’t even have the balls to stand up for their own people, land, and culture. According to Jews, whites own nothing that is their own. Everything white exists to serve Jews. So, if there is a white nation, the white people have no right to think, "We are white, this is our nation, this is our culture, and it belongs to us." No, they must think, "We whites have no culture and no identity. We exist to make Jews happy and must do anything to facilitate this... or else, we are Nazis or ‘anti-Semites’. And since we exist to serve the Other, the Jews, we must also put All the Others before our own interest. So, the UK is no longer the land of Britons, the real White Britons but must prioritize itself as a welcome mat for endless migration-invasions of Africans, Muslims, and Asians. Accordingly, white Britons exist only to make the rest of the world happy by welcoming them to take over white lands, white institutions, and even white women so that Negro men can colonize white wombs to create mulattos who identify as ‘black’ and accuse white people of ‘racism’. Yes, this is what the Relatives of Jews are up to.

So, next time you meet a Jew who whines about how his or her ‘relatives died in the Holocaust’, you ask him or her about what his or her OTHER relatives have done to the world. Here’s a sample of what the OTHER Jewish relatives have done:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Of course, as Jewish ethno-monopoly controls the internet, if you search for Jewish malfeasance, you mostly get search results that lead to Jewish-owned media outlets bitching about how it is ‘antisemitic’ to connect the dots between Jewish Power and Jewish abuses, such as the Financial Crisis.

https://www.google.com/search?q=jews+and+wall+street+finanical+crisis&rlz=1C1AOHY_enUS768US768&oq=jews+and+wall+street+finanical+crisis&aqs=chrome..69i57.14211j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Having turned ‘antisemitism’ into a taboo word, Jews can deflect responsibility for anything they do just by invoking the magic term. So, if a bunch of Jews beat up a Palestinian child to death and if you report what you saw, you can are denounced as an ‘anti-Semite’ for having mouthed an ‘antisemitic’ stereotype of Jews as exploitative oppressors. The way ‘antisemitism’ is employed, it means any observation or view that is critical of Jewish power and its abuses. According to this logic, Jews have always been pure as snow and blameless, and that means every negative aspersion about Jews all through the ages was wrong, wrong, and wrong, merely paranoia cooked up by ‘rabid and virulent’ looneys. So, if Jews were always right and ‘anti-Semites’ were always wrong, then it means that if YOU notice something bad about Jews in the here-and-now, YOU too are an ‘anti-Semite’ who is perpetuating the old ‘canard’ about blameless and pure-as-snow Jews. Of course, the Jew-run media are more than happy to prop up the Jewish Myth of Jewish Nobility even as Jewish elites collude behind the scenes to rake in everything for their own Tribe.
Even when Jews rob the entire world and cause havoc for all of mankind, the Jew-run media will tell us that Jews are saving the World. What a truly vile and wretched people.

Finally, Jews need to stop bitching about how OTHER nations didn't do enough to save Jews from the Shoah. Jews need to be more self-aware and ask themselves why (1) Germans came to hate Jews so much and (2) why other nations didn't care much about Jews.
The answer is obvious. Jews built up a reputation over the ages of being a vile, nasty, and subversive people. If Jews hadn't been such rapacious financial exploiters(on the capitalist side), such ruthless radicals(on the socialist side), and such degenerates(on the cultural front), there never would have been much in the way of 'antisemitism'. Just because Jews suffered the horrible Shoah doesn't cleanse Jews of their foulness, just like the horrific nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki doesn't expunge Japanese of their crimes in WWII. After the war, Japanese came to realize that they'd done terrible things but also came to be terribly victimized. There was some balance in Japan's remembrance of the war. But Jews remember 20th century only as 'We pure-as-snow Jews wronged by the world'. Jews think they have some divine right to mess up any part of the world, and if the local population rise up against Jews, OTHER nations must offer Jews refuge so that Jews can start the foul pattern of subversion all over again.
Even when the Soviet Experiment went badly for Jews in the end, Jews lacked the self-awareness to admit that THEIR project had failed them(and led to deaths of millions of Slavs and others). Instead, the Jew-run media spun it into SAVE SOVIET JEWS as if the Jews were always the main victims of Soviet Communism. Such lack of self-awareness. A hideous people. And yet, they rule the US and the world.

Why White People Need Their Own COVENANT in a One-Truth and One-Power World

Why did Jews need a Covenant with God? It was because they believed in only one God. If Jews believed in many gods for different peoples as pagan folks did, then there would have been no need for the Covenant. Jews would have said Romans have their gods, Syrians have their gods, Persians have their gods, Egyptians have their gods, and so on; therefore, we Jews have own God or gods. If Jews have their own God or gods and if other peoples have their own gods, then every people are satisfied and secure in the worship of their own gods. In the absence of one God and one Truth to rule over all the heavens, all the earth, and all of man, there is no need for a Covenant. After all, the gods of your people are yours. Granted, pagans might ‘steal’ other people’s gods or fuse their gods with foreign gods. Romans fused many of their gods with Greek gods. Still, your people have a unique set of gods and other peoples have their more-or-less unique sets of gods. Even when one pagan tribe took the gods of another tribe, they eventually transformed the gods into their own. And Jews could have been content with God or gods of their own while believing in the legitimacy of other peoples having their own gods to worship.

But Jews didn’t go that way. Out of boldness, imagination, arrogance, megalomania, or whatever, Jews came to believe in only one God for themselves. So, if pagan folks worshiped many gods, Jews only worshiped one God. But Jews didn’t end there. They decided all the other gods of pagan folks are false gods. They don’t exist, they are not real, they have no validity. Only the one and only Jewish God is the sole maker and ruler of all. In a way, such a development may have been defensive. After all, since many other tribes were bigger and stronger than Jews, there was the chance that Jews might be tempted to ditch the Jewish tribe and its God and go join some other tribe that is mightier and worship their god-idols. But if every Jewish child were instilled from childhood with the warning all other gods are false — and it is a GRAVE SIN to worship their idols — , there was much less chance of Jews going over to other tribes to worship different gods.
But the development of Jewish psycho-theology was also aggressive, ambitious, and ‘imperialist’. If Jews couldn’t conquer the material world with hands and feet, they could conquer the spiritual world with the feat of imagination. So, in their souls, Jews came to believe that their God not only conquered all the world but own all the world. Indeed, Jews went even further and said their God created the world. Pagan mythologies were far more humble in their claim. Few if any said their gods created everything. Even in Hinduism, the gods are as created by the cosmos that is created or ‘dreamed’ by them.

So, in the Jewish spiritual imagination, there is only one God, and this God is for all times, all places, and all peoples. But here’s the rub. If there is only one God, and if He did indeed make all the world, all the peoples, all the places, and all the things, why would He favor any one people? Wouldn't all the world be part of His holiness? Wouldn’t all peoples be His beloved children? Wouldn’t all things be His precious creations? If God is the only God and if He has universal ownership and mastery over everyone and everything, then why would He belong to Jews alone?
Now, such considerations didn’t worry Jews prior to the development of monotheism. At one point, the proto-Jews had their god or gods, and they respected the fact that other tribes had their own gods. So, Jews prayed to their god or gods, and other tribes had their own forms of idol-worship. But at some point, Jews got into ferocious prophetic mode, and their leaps of imagination led to believe that they must worship only one God, and furthermore, their one and only God is the one and only God of all the universe. With a blinding stroke, the Jewish mind exploded an atomic bomb in the spirit-verse and wiped out all the competing gods. "...now I am become Death, the destroyer of gods..." And in the end, the Jewish mind decided there is only one God and one Truth. All other competing gods are not even inferior gods or even defeated gods. They are false gods, and they never existed. They were phony from the start, because from the beginning of time to the end of time, there was, is, and will be only one God, the God of the Jewish imagination.

But if this God is so great and if Jews are such a humble insignificant tribe, why would God favor the Jews? I mean, if there were indeed just one God in the universe, wouldn’t it be likelier that He would favor and side with a great powerful tribe than one so pathetic as that of the Hebrews? In ancient times, the Jews weren’t even close to being a great power. Even at the height of their glory, they ruled over just a bit of land and soon got invaded by others and had to survive at their mercy. So, why would the great God have favored such a pathetic tribe? After all, in pagan stories, gods favor the strong and powerful. Greek gods, Persian gods, Roman gods, or Germanic gods, they bestow affection and favors on the heroes, adventurers, and conquerors. Jews were far less accomplished in those fields that other tribes and kingdoms that were much greater.
And this is why Jews needed to come up with the Covenant. Without it, there was no guarantee that God would stick with the Jews. Imagine there’s an island with only women. Suppose each woman believes in her own dream man. Some women are beautiful, some women are plain, some woman are ugly. But each has a dream of her ideal man. But suppose one homely woman says all their dreams are false. Only HER dream of the ideal man is true. So, her dream and only her dream of man has validity. Now suppose what she says comes to be true. While all the men of other dreams never materialize, the man of her dreams does materialize. Suppose one evening, a man arrives on the shore of the island, and it is the man of the homely woman’s imagination. So, she was right, whereas all the other dreams of man were false. There is only one man, and he is it. BUT, if indeed it is true that he is the only man, a wonderful handsome man, where’s the guarantee that he would choose the homely woman over other women who are much prettier? So, if the homely woman is to bind the man to her, she has to come up with a covenant between him and her. Without that sacred bond, he might act like Bill Clinton and drive her crazy like Billy Boy did to Hillary. Also, not only would he want to go to others, but all the women will want him since the word is out that he is the one and only man. When the women had believed that their dreams of man were also valid, each could hope for the arrival of her special man. But if they all now agree that there is only one man, then all will want to do it with him.

The Jewish way of spirituality and truth has always been ultra-contradictory. They wanted their God to be Lord over all but belong only to the Jews. Jews were like an ultra-jealous wife. Jews insisted there is only one Truth for the world, yet they wanted sole ownership of this truth. We still see this Jewish trait today. America is like the god of power, the one and only superpower in all the world. On the one hand, Jews promote America as the lord of all nations, the one and only model for all peoples and cultures. The American Way is the only way, and all the world must be Americanized abroad, and all peoples must aspire to come to America. And yet, America must serve Jewish interests above all. Even as America is a ruler over and savior of all peoples, it must have a special covenant with the Jews. AIPAC makes sure that the US pledges no loyalty to any other nation but Israel. Jews hate Donald Trump even though he’s pro-Zionist because he ran on better relations with Russia(a nation totally hated by Jews) and ending the Wars for Israel. What? United States improving relations with Russia that refused to let Jews take over everything? What? United States not fighting more wars to strengthen Israel’s hands in the Middle East?

Also, Trump’s anti-immigrationist stance is threatening to the Jewish notion of the special covenant between the US and Jews. After all, the people with the greatest historical claim of covenant with America are the Anglos. They are the ones who settled it with colonies, they are the ones who fought the Revolutionary War, and they are ones who laid the foundations of America. So, if any people can claim a special covenant with the US, it is the Anglos(and their Dutch and Germanic brethren) who did the most heavy-lifting in the formative stages to expand and build the nation. American Indians were here first, but they had to be removed in order for America to be possible. Black slaves did a lot of heavy-lifting in the South, but it wasn’t their vision, ideas, values, culture, and language that made America.

But if Anglos have a special covenant with America, then it means Jews have no right to steer the one and only America as lone superpower to their own ends. If America must serve Jews like the one and only God serves the Jews, then the American covenant must be with Jews, not with Anglos. Just like God lords over all peoples but only serves Jews, America must lord over(and provide for) all peoples but serve only Jews. Imagine if America decided to serve the interests and the narrative of Palestinian-Americans as well as that of Jewish-Americans. Zionism would come under a lot of heat, like white rule in South Africa.
Trump’s implicitly pro-white anti-immigration stance is seen by Jews as an attempt to restore the American covenant back into the hands of white gentiles, especially people of Anglo-Celtic-Germanic stock. Even though Jews frame the immigration-debate as one between ‘white supremacist’ America and wonderful Diversity, it’s really between white American special covenant and Jewish American special covenant. Jews are pro-immigration because, on their own, they simply don’t have the numbers. Now, if the US were 80% Jewish, I guarantee Jews would NOT be calling for more immigration unless it’s Jewish.

Because Anglos and Northern Europeans have the most powerful rationale for a special covenant with America, Jews have done everything to impugn, discredit, invalidate, or reinterpret the founding and development of America. So, Jews say the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were not foundations for a creation of white Christian nation but a universal proposition nation. So, Jews make a big fuss about black slavery to instill whites with guilt. (Jews don't make a fuss about slavery in Latin American nations even though they brought over many more slaves — and many Jews were involved in slavery in Brazil — because Jews need Latinos as allies against whites. Jews also don’t make much of a fuss about the ‘genocide’ and ‘rape’ of the indigenous folks in Latin America for the same reason and also to promote race-mixing as a good to deracinate the white race. And Jews are no longer interested in American Indians because their tragic story is about how immigration-invasion can destroy the native cultures of a land. It’s difficult to be romantic about Emma Lazarus when one considers what happened to American Indians. It’s like Zionist immigration to Palestine led to Nakba and dispossession of Palestinians who ended up on their trail of tears.) To instill whites with guilt, Jews made the Civil War a bigger event than the Revolutionary War. It won’t be long before Jews make the date of Emancipation Proclamation or the end of the Civil War a bigger holiday than the Fourth of July. Jews also love the Civil War because it could be spun as ‘good whites’ siding with ‘justice’ against ‘bad whites’, a theme that would recur in WWII(for far more valid reason as Hitler was really something else). The Jewish lesson of the American Civil War is that whites must attack and fight other whites than side with fellow whites. Jews thrive from divisions among gentiles. Jews remember how the rapprochement between Northern whites and Southern whites led to tremendous revival of white power that held back Jewish interests in the first half of the 20th century. The massive immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe drove many Northern whites(even former Liberals and Progressives) into an alliance with fellow Anglos in the South. All their own problem with immigrants made them sympathize more with Southern whites’ problem with blacks. Northern whites felt, "If we are having such trouble with white folks such as Poles, Russians, Hungarians, Greeks, Italians, Jews, and etc., imagine how tough it must be down south with all them Negroes?" And, so there was growing unity of spirit and purpose between Northern Anglos and Southern whites, and this unity led to tremendous political victories, one of which was ending mass immigration in the mid 1920s. Jews see this as a calamity because of WWII and the Shoah. Jews feel that, had the immigration gates been kept open, many more Jews could have escaped Europe. But Jews never ask themselves whether things would not have gotten so bad for Jews if (1) they didn’t play such a prominent role in the Bolshevik Revolution that ended up killing and tyrannizing so many people (2) they didn’t employ financial dirty trick and cultural degeneracy to make things far worse for Germans in the depressions that followed WWI. But expecting self-reflection among the likes of Jennifer Rubin, William Kristol, Jonathan Podhoretz, Max Boot, Harvey Weinstein, Sarah Silverman, and etc. is a bridge too far.

Anyway, Jews eventually gained near-total control of the elite institutions and industries of America as the one-and-only-superpower(following the Cold War and so-called End of History), and they decided to change the narrative and whatever necessary to ensure that the American Covenant is with Jews and only with Jews. And to secure this, America must rule over Diversity because Diversity cannot unite against Jewish power. And white people will forget about White America because such a concept stirs up memory of a different time when most white Americans felt, most justifiably, that the main American covenant is with Anglos and Anglo-Americanized white European Christians. This is why Jews are so eager to destroy the notion of White America. This is why Jews promote stuff like HAMILTON that has the Founding Fathers as a bunch of ‘groids’. And of course, Latin American whites are eager to collaborate with Jews since the much greater success of Anglo-America had made them feel so small and insignificant for so long. It’s the Latin American way of getting revenge by serving as toadies of Jews.
And it is also why Jews have been especially committed to spreading PC in Northern European nations like UK, Sweden, Ireland, and Germany. After all, those peoples were the covenant-ial building blocks of America. Consider the films EMIGRANTS and THE NEW LAND by Jan Troell. In the past, when white Americans looked back to those nations, they saw whiteness, all whiteness, and the whiteness reminded them of their true origins and roots. But now, due to Jewish intellectual virus having infected the institutions of all those nations, they’ve been committed to (1) massive non-white immigration (2) declaring that their identity is purely cultural and not of blood (3) race-mixing makes for superior people because pale whites sucks (4) feminism that makes white women hate white men, thus breaking the sexual covenant between white men and white women (5) Jungle Fever and ACOWW(Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) on the premise that white women must go with ‘superior’ Negro males while cucky white males accept their inferiority and crawl into their Cuckanda (6) retro-characterizing European heroes and giants as black, a common practice with BBC; even a Finnish TV movie cast a black guy in the role of a famous military officer.

So, there is a reason why Jews have intensified their culture war in Northern European nations. Why did Jewish media pour so much efforts into those nations? It’s because of their historical, cultural, and racial ties to their cousins in the US. As American browns, white Anglos, Germans, Irish, Swedes, and other are bound to look to the old countries for identity and roots. But if even their ancient homelands are Africanized, Asianized, and Islamized, they don’t even have a homeland to hark back to. (Imagine if you remember a time when everyone in your community was white, and things were so much better. The memory of an earlier time might inspire you to rebel against the current order. But suppose Jews have a mind-device that alters your memory so that you remember half of your white friends as blacks or browns. Then, even memory would no longer be a guide to action to restore what you've lost.)

Now, you don’t see Jews doing the same to Israel. Why would American Jews support Jewish-only immigration to Israel but push for non-white invasion of nations like UK, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, and etc? It’s not only to break the white will in those nations but to gaslight and demoralize white Americans. If white Americans see the very lands of their forefathers and foremothers going the way of Diversity and even celebrating it like retards, then what hope is there for white revival in the US? And once white hope is broken, Jews will own the American Covenant for themselves forever as NO OTHER PEOPLE have claim to it once whites are out of the picture. It’s also like Jews believe Israel can have nukes but not Iran.

Anyway, the Jewish contradiction of God, Truth, and Power wasn’t exactly stable. Indeed, it was radioactive. How can a people come up with an idea of the one and only God but insist this God serves only Jews even as He rules over all? And why would He make a special promise to Jews but not to any other people? How can such a singular and universal God be cuffed to one people? Now, this contradiction didn’t matter so much when most gentiles just ignored Jews and showed no interest in Jewish spiritual ideas. Indeed, for the longest time, the Romans scoffed at Jewish pretensions. The Roman way was to just let the Jews be as long as they paid their taxes. I mean what did it matter to gentiles or to Jews if Jewish faith belonged only with Jews? Even if Jews say there is only one God, your own pagan tribe can go on believing in your own gods.
But then, something happened. Jesus, His Disciples, and Paul decided to ‘democratize’ God’s rule. He would be made into a ‘propositional’ God, and the Jewish Biblical ‘constitution’ would be reinterpreted to mean that, from the beginning, the REAL prophecy of the Torah pointed to the arrival of Jesus who would make God’s justice and love equal to all the people of the world. This was bound to make the Jews shit, not least because the crazy idea was hatched by a bunch of Jews. I mean, the Old Testament is clearly Tribal and says God gave the Covenant to the Jews. But the New Testament claimed deeper understanding of sacred texts that interpreted events in the Old Testament as prophecy paving the way for Jesus the Messiah for all mankind. Jews reacted to this like Alan Dershowitz reacts to Norman Finkelstein or Philip Weiss.

Now, if Christianity had merely spread to some weak pagan tribes under Roman rule, it might not have amounted to much. But it eventually made inroads into the Roman elites, and they finally decided to make it the official and then the ONLY faith in the land. This meant that the universal vision of Jesus would have the backing of universal military might. The word and the sword would work together. Now, why were the Romans finally attracted to Christianity? Outwardly, one might say some Romans were moved by the story of Jesus, His love, His sacrifice, His Resurrection, His message of peace and justice, His promise of afterlife to the virtuous and redeemed. But there was surely another reason. Through Jesus, Romans could claim to have the blessing of the most powerful conception of God ever. So, the message of Jesus’ love was really a cover for what REALLY attracted the Romans to the new faith. Its God was the most powerfully conceived deity in the universe. Compared to Him, Jupiter was but a gopher. Indeed, all the pagan Roman gods combined didn’t amount to pack of prairie dogs compared to the Jewish conception of God. After all, the Roman gods weren’t all powerful. They weren’t around at the beginning of time. They have to negotiate with other gods since each power as limited powers. In contrast, the Jewish God is infinite, eternal, all-encompassing, all-knowing, all-powerful, and everything under and over the sun. Romans had always been dissatisfied with their own gods because they were limited in form and power. For a people hellbent on conquering all the known world, their gods just didn’t keep up with the pace. It was like having a rock band where the lead guitarist played only acoustic. For them to really make it big, they would need a Jimmi Page or Eric Clapner as electric guitar god. Likewise, if Romans were to be masters of all, they needed to follow a God who was the ruler of all. This way, Romans could not only own all of earth but all of heaven. They would conquer not only bodies but souls.

And this is when things got really serious for Jews. It was one thing to be live under pagan Roman rule. But when Romans had the Jewish God as their own and not only spread the faith among Romans but all peoples within the Empire, Jews really needed to hold onto the covenant to remain a special people. Prior to the spread of Christianity, the special relation between Jews and God could be maintained simply because non-Jews showed little or no interest in Jewish culture or faith. But once the Jewish concept of God went nuclear, exploded, and spread all over the world, it was only the Covenant that assured them a fallout shelter... like the one that the school-master is trying to open at the end of Coen Brothers’ SERIOUS MAN as a tornado approaches. Without that Covenant, Jews could have been swept up with the rest of humanity in the new faith and become scattered, assimilated, and lost among so many other tribes.

Now, what does this have to do with White folks? It’s a question of survival. When the Jewish God was universalized, how were Jews able to survive as a people and culture? Because, despite the fact that Jews and Christians(and later Muslims) worshiped the same God, only Jews had the Covenant that made them feel that they and only they had a special contract with God. So, in the end, it didn’t matter to Jews if their God went over to gentiles who called themselves Christians or Muslims. What mattered was that Jews could carry on with their ancient conviction that, even if God rules over all of mankind and shows His love to them, only the Jews have a special covenant with Him.
Of course, Christians and Muslims could tell themselves that Jews are deluded, that the Jewish Covenant was broken with the coming of Jesus, and that Jews are just so full of shi* with their conceit of a special Covenant. Also, how could Jews compete with growing numbers of Christians and Muslims — as both encouraged conversion among all humanity around the world — when Jews, who favor Covenant over Conversion, remained fixed in number and expanded only by the slow process of childbirth? And yet, the lack of a special covenant among Christians and Muslims meant that their power would be diffuse, divided, and confused than concentrated. Because Jews were a family of people, their Covenant bound their shared blood with God. In contrast, precisely because Christians and Muslims came to comprise such large populations, they couldn’t agree on much of anything. So, Catholics and Protestants got to fighting. And Shias and Sunnis got to hating each other. Also, even if the faithful were all of one sect or denomination, they could be divided along race. It’s like white Christians, black Christians, and Mexican Christians never had much in common, and each people invoked God for totally different purposes.
But because Christians, especially white ones for some reason, theoretically identify with and care for all fellow Christians regardless of race, creed, or color, their sense of white identity and interests grew weaker. Also, try as they might, even with the utmost goodwill, to connect with non-whites as fellow Christians or possible converts, there wasn’t much that whites felt in common with non-whites. In contrast, Jews were compact and united, relatively speaking, and all the more remarkable considering that they had to survive as minorities in exile and scattered all over the Middle East and Europe. Jewish power was like a city where the population is closely packed together. The Covenant provided Jews, even in exile, with a sense of shared blood and purpose. So, some Jews could be in Poland, some Jews could be in Germany, some Jews could be in Italy, some Jews could be in Iran, and etc., but the Covenant made them feel close even though they were so distant from one another and unlikely to ever meet one another. But as long as the Covenant existed, there was the Israel of the heart even before there was Israel of the feet that called on World Jewry to come together in family unification. Now, consider the Japanese in contrast. Because they have no Covenant, they can easily become estranged from one another. Japanese in America just become Americanized and ridiculous like Yoko Ono. And when Japanese who’d settled in Brazil returned to Japan, the Japanese people didn’t relate to them, and they didn’t relate to Japanese people. And in neighboring Korea, there is hardly any passion for national reunification because, lacking a national Covenant, Koreans don’t feel very close to one another despite their long history of having survived as one people and culture. And have you seen Josef Stalin’s granddaughter recently? That Russo-Georgian idiot, having no real grounding in meaningful identity or heritage, has degenerated into an idiot teen-wanna-be. And of course, Jews who lose a meaningful sense of Jewishness are also likely to lose it and turn into flotsam and jetsam.

For a long long time, there was a kind of defacto covenant between Europeans and Christianity. Even though the origins of Christianity are in the Middle East and even though the faith spread all over Near East and North Africa, the eventual triumph of Islam turned those areas into Islamosphere. Had those parts remained Christian, the history of Christianity for the first 1,500 yrs might have been bi- or tri-racial. But because Arabs and other non-whites became Muslim, Christianity became mostly a mono-racial power in conflict with Muslims who were not only different in both faith and face. As such, there was no danger of the Vatican being overrun with a bunch of darkies and swarthers. A blackamoor like Othello was an exception than the rule in most of Europe except in parts that had been colonized by North Africans for a spell.

Had Europe kept to itself, its people-culture-religion may have remained all-in-the-family. But for a host of reasons, the West came to dominate all the Rest. Indeed, the Western Way became so dominant and so pervasive that people all around the world don’t even realize how Westernized they’ve become in terms of their dress, technology, eating habits, and use of time. This Triumph of the West can be a matter of pride for Europeans(and white Americans are really just transplanted Europeans), but as with the Romans who conquered everyone but then got conquered by everyone, there is a good chance that whites will lose their way precisely because the Western Way has become the World Way. Because the West did so much to transform the world, there is this idea that the world should not only learn from the West but come to the West, become part of the West, and constitute the New Way. So, non-whites should abandon their way to join the Western Way as the only World Way, and in turn, whites should abandon their identity to accommodate all the non-whites who want to be part of the Western way. So, non-whites lose their culture to become Western, and whites lose their race to universalize the Western Way.

Obviously, this is a recipe for disaster for the white race, white heritage, and white territoriality. The current globalism is a pipe dream. It’s one thing to find John Lennon’s "Imagine" to be a nice in melody and sentiment, but it’s quite another to form a world order on the basis of such tripe, all the more so when so much that is now called ‘Western’ is really Jewish supremacist, Afro-thuggery, and Homomaniacal. Therefore, it is of the greatest essence that white people look deep into their hearts and history to formulate a covenant for themselves in the current globalized order. We cannot put the genie of universalism back in the bottle. The Western Way of math, science, economics, technology, pop culture, and dress have become universalized. Also, all the world has caught onto the concept of ‘human rights’, and there is no going back from English being a World Language. Just like what had been unique to the Jews became universalized through Christianity, what had been unique to the West has become universalized through Western military power, communication, free trade, pop culture, media, and academia, much of it controlled by Jews. When so much that had been uniquely white had been made rendered worldwide, how can anything uniquely European survive. This is where it requires individual with leaps and depths of imagination and vision to formulate a unique covenant between white people and the destiny of the world.

Even when the Jewish God became a World God, Jews survived as a people and culture by doubling down on their Covenant that said their relationship to God was special. So, even as Jews recognized how God could be revered and worshiped by peoples all over the world, they maintained that they had a special connection to God that was unlike any other. Then, likewise, whites people need to come up with some way to believe that even though the Western Way has become the World Way, there are still things so deeply unique and special in being white that white folks and only white folks have this Covenant with the Western World Way.