Commentary on "Lying about Judeo-Bolshevism"(by Andrew Joyce) — Judeo-Bolshevism and Judeo-Christianity — Karl Marx & the un-tamable Beast of Capitalism — The Jewish Culture of Prophetics and the Nuclear Mind of Jewish Will to Power, aka the Schwill of Spaceballsian Schwarzian Magnitude

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/03/02/lying-about-judeo-bolshevism/

The notion of Judeo-Bolshevism is as problematic as the notion of Judeo-Christianity.

While Karl Marx and many early communists were ethnically Jewish, they were not happy Jews nor were they secret supremacists pushing a radical agenda for crypto-Jewish-hegemony. One could argue that their Jewish genetics(especially intelligence, personality, and temperament) shaped their attitudes, perspective, and worldview -- after all, the political grows out of the personal -- , but there's no doubt that men like Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky were sincerely committed to World Revolution premised on the Brotherhood of Man.
Now, on the subconscious level, were they driven by tribal-megalomaniacal energies going back to ancient times? Perhaps, but it can't be ascertained one way or another, only speculated. While it's true that Jewish historical experience on both the personal and social front shaped the Marxian worldview, this can be said of any group. After all, every people interpreted and practiced Christianity in their own way: Italian Catholicism, German Lutheranism, Southern Baptism, Negro Church, etc. And when communism spread around the world, it was 'nationalized' differently in every nation. Owing to variances of history, demographics, culture, and tradition, Cuban communism was distinct from Romanian communism that was distinct from North Korean communism. Then, it should hardly surprise us that Marxism was indelibly stamped with the Will of Jewish Personality because ethnic Jews played such a prominent role in the formation of radical communism. Likewise, Ayn Rand's theories of individualism were far more radical and prophetic than those of relatively restrained Anglo tradition or pragmatic American tradition. Rand may have considered herself secular and godless, but she had one powerful Jewish personality. Marx and Jews didn't invent socialism or communism but gave it a distinct ethno-charge that, for awhile, achieved critical mass to alter the rotation of the world in a new direction.

Karl Marx and many early communists were secular Jews or Anti-Jews(just like Nietzsche was Anti-Christ), and many had negative feelings toward Jewish religion(as a drag on Jewish progress) and Jewish bourgeoisie(as a driver of inequality and injustice, thereby instigating more anti-Jewish sentiments among the pauperized goyim). Later, the Chinese communists would feel much the same way about their own culture. Maoists attacked Confucianism as a dead weight around China's neck that prevented progress; they also attacked capitalism as the tool of collaborators and imperialists(as Chinese capitalists had profited from business with European, American, and Japanese aggressors). People like Marx, in rejecting both ancient Jewish tradition and modern Jewish capital, hoped to find a new path which would lead to the resolution of all contradictions, be they class or tribal conflicts. A world in which all classes would merge into one, a world in which Jews and Gentiles would just be comrades committed to equal work, equal leisure, and equal commitment to arts and culture.
Tremendous changes were afoot in a world turned upside down by the Industrial Revolution as Karl Marx noted in THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. The reason for Marx's emphasis on economics owed to the realization that the material dynamics behind capitalism was fueling the greatest revolution in human history REGARDLESS of ideas or arguments for or against it. The rapid transformation of the world from the late 18th century to the 19th century owed little to ideas. After all, there had been ideas as radical or even more so all throughout history since the beginning of time. Besides, the politically less radical UK and Germany(which was ruled by the Kaiser and reactionary ministers) underwent far greater material revolutions than France where radical ideas and movements were more commonplace. If ideas alone can change the world, the Ancient Greeks, who were so rich in ideas, would have changed everything. But they didn't because they lacked the materialist dynamics that could take on a life of its own. Today, some people worry about A.I. superseding mankind and taking over the world, but in the 19th century, hyper-economic forces took on life and logic of their own and could not be stopped. Once the industrial revolution took off due to a confluence of cultural, legal, and material factors, humanity was confronted with a power much bigger than philosophy, religion, politics, tradition, and privilege. It was as if capitalism had unleashed the Beast driven by market forces of greed and profit. As Karl Marx saw it, NOTHING could stop this Beast. No idea, no plea, no movement, and no amount of moral condemnation could stop it. Indeed, Marxism was meant less as a manual for action against capitalism than as a preparation for the day when the Capitalist Beast will collapse from its own contradictions. The most that Marxists could do is ready themselves for the eventual day when the Beast has collapsed from its own weight and can be finished off by radicals who'd been waiting patiently with sharpened spears. It's like the story of Cyclops in THE ODYSSEY. As the one-eyed giant is too big and strong, the men have no chance of defeating it. So, they just wait for the gluttonous and self-indulgent giant to gorge on food and wine to the point of becoming incapacitated, and it is then they strike.

Intoxication of Cyclops

Marx understood the power of the Beast of Capital. As the material world changed, traditions and conventions faded, and it led to both spiritual malaise and visionary renewal, and this is what Friedrich Nietzsche became the prophet of, indeed the rare non-Jewish one. And as the new order allowed more individual choices unloosed from old restraints, sexual temptation was bound to be a key factor in capitalism for its profit potential. (Capitalists would seek to commoditize sexuality, anarchists would seek to weaponize sexuality, and communists would seek to re-moralize sexuality in terms of men and women as comrades.) Anyway, with so much of the Old Way fading fast but without new truths to replace them, the era from mid-19th century to Fin-de-Siecle was bound to be a time of prophets, visionary artists, and radicals. Jews played a prominent role in this period because (1) they've long had a prophetic mindset and tradition and (2) freed from the confines of Rabbinical Messianism, modern Jews could apply their prophetic outlook on the secular world. Incidentally, we are living in similar times today as (1) there is exponential growth in technology that has taken on a life of its own (2) old credos have lost their authority while new ones offer little more than empty idolatry of holy Holocaust Jews, Magic Negroes, and 'rainbow' Homos (3) calamitous times are afoot due to demographic upheavals. There is also the great contradiction between the conceit of 'liberal democracy' and the reality of rule by tribal oligarchy of Jewish Supremacists.

Karl Marx believed that money is to Jews what alcohol is to the Irish. Jews take to money like leeches to blood. Marx lamented how Jews practiced the Shylock Doctrine wherever possible to make profits on the backs of long-suffering humanity. He was convinced that the only way to resolve the Jewish Question was to rid the world of capital. A kind of Economic Prohibition. Jews, more than any other people, had become intoxicated with capital as the result of their experience as financiers, middlemen, and money changers.
But the end of capital could not be brought about by any leader or movement. The power of capitalism and the beast it unleashed were too powerful. Such a force could only be brought down by its own internal contradictions, and then and only then, the radicals would pounce on the Beast and finish it off. But, in some ways, Marx saw capitalism as the biggest blessing for mankind. No pain, no gain. As merciless, greedy, and ravenous as capitalism was, no force had been as powerful and effective in transforming the world from rural backwardness & aristocratic privilege to urban awareness & mass consciousness. And once the ownership class were eventually destroyed by the contradictions of capitalism, all the property, infrastructure, and wealth they'd built and accumulated would fall into the hands of the workers. Capitalism was like the greatest forest fire of all time. It led to much destruction but cleared the deadwood and provided fertilizer so that new trees could grow, hopefully by feeding on the nutrients equally.

The early communists were both Jewish in ethnicity and anti-Jewish in agenda. But this could be said of early Christians as well. All early Christians were Jewish, and then, for a long stretch, the majority of Christians remained Jews(or heretical Jews). The term 'Judeo-Christian' might indeed be applicable to this period because the movement was so heavily dominated by heretical Jews and had yet to completely sever ties to Jewish tradition(much in the way that Freudianism had trouble recruiting anyone but eccentric Jews to the field). Early Christians were both Jewish and anti-Jewish in espousing a new faith that grew out of Judaism but also railed against it. But then, Jesus Himself had been rather ambiguous, sometimes portraying Himself as a reverent bearer of tradition, at other times intimating that His mission is to change everything.
As Christianity is a universal faith, once its flames spread and caught on with the gentiles, it naturally came to be dominated and defined by gentile converts & their children than by the descendants of the Jewish early Christians.
Same was true of communism. Given its universal character, communism was bound to attract many more non-Jews than Jews in the long run: China, Vietnam, Cuba, Angola, and etc. Especially when Israel allied with the US and communist Jews began to feel stirrings of Zionist pride(or were suspected of such), the hammer came down hard on many communist elites of Jewish background... though, all in all, your average Jew in the USSR or Eastern Europe was probably better off than your average goy, not least due to higher IQ, adeptness at economic bootlegging, and connections to rich Jews in the West(however tenuous). American Jews did a lot of favors for Soviet Jews though, in fact, your average Jew in the USSR was better off than your average goy Soviet.

In the early years of Christianity, Jewish Christians were persecuted by Jews and disdained by pagans. But eventually, they managed to capture the imagination of pagan Rome, and then the movement took on a life of its own. It is somewhat analogous to what happened later with communism as it passed from Jews to Goyim. While it's important for us to remember the horrors of communism and the Jewish role in it, we also need to ask why Jewish-created worldviews had such a messianic impact on humanity. Kevin MacDonald has written about the Jewish Culture of Critique, but he has yet to fully discuss something that is more important: the Culture of Prophetique. According to MacDonald and his admirers, Jews are the Eternal subversives who deconstruct and undermine the social order, especially that of the goyim. But no idea or movement can gain such momentum and power as communism did for a time just by being anti-something or counter-something. It has to be FOR something too. And this is where the Jewish Power of Prophecy comes into play. Communism presented the final prophetic formula that would unite science, sociology, economics, morality, history, spirituality, and creativity all in one. It envisioned a new world of justice, equality, and brotherhood of man, and this inspired many people(mostly goyim) around the world. We must give the Jewish Devil his due in the sheer ability to think big and convert masses of mankind.

Why do Jews control so many goyim? Why are Jews the hands while goyim are the clay? It's because Jews have had the chutzpah and audacity to think big, to imagine the one and only God. Jewish Prophets reached beyond the scope of most men and sought to peer into the mind of the all-knowing Deity. It is this bigness of vision and thought that has made Jewish Thought so paradigmatic in world history. In the 20th century, who was the most influential author? Franz Kafka. Who was the most admired film-director with cult-like following? Stanley Kubrick who made 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY. Jews use the Culture of Critique to clear the way to fulfill the far more important Culture of Prophetique. Unless goyim learn to think 'bigly', their minds will always be the clay in Jewish hands. Even when Jews think up utterly crazy and stupid shit(like Homomania or Diversity Is Our Strenght or DIOS), they gain such mass following because they do it with such energy, drive, vision, and determination. Like many people, I think Ayn Rand was nuts, but THE FOUNTAINHEAD is something more than a dry theory on individualism. It is individualism as far-seeing and far-reaching heroic mythology. Western Civilization produced many great warriors, scientists, philosophers, artists, leaders, inventors, and etc, but no prophets... with the possible exceptions of Martin Luther, Ludwig van Beethoven, Richard Wagner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Carl Jung, Martin Heidegger, and Adolf Hitler, all Germans by the way. The reason why the world burned to the ground from fires emanating from Central Europe was due to the friction of Jewish prophetic power and Germano-Aryan prophetic power. History couldn't take that much heat. Upon losing World War II, Germans have suppressed their romantic passion and now await national death. They have lost the power of will. Jews still have prophetic power, but all their wealth and privilege have turned them decadent and degenerate, and their current vision for the world is 'worship the holy homo and franny tranny' and 'worship the mandingo with mega-dong'. Anyways, those with prophetic power will rule over those without. Prophets claim to see the world and history from a higher perspective. As such, they can look further into the distance for meaning and truth, past and future. People who lack the prophetic vision just follow those with the vision. As Jews have verbal ability, they use terminology to define the world to buttress their preferences and prejudices. So, terms such as 'racism', 'antisemitism', 'homophobia', and 'xenophobia', as defined by Jewish Academia(in the role of modern rabbis) and Jewish Media(in the role of modern calls to prayer), set the 'terms of service' for those who are unwilling or incapable of thinking for themselves. Those who don't think or think small will always be owned by those who think big. Just like the big fish eats the small fish, big brains own the smaller brains. Romans knew how to conquer with swords and shields, but it was the Jewish mind that conquered the universe with visions of the one and only all-knowing God.

In the 19th and 20th century, Jewish capitalists had an ambiguous relation to communism. On the one hand, they saw it as a threat, as did all capitalists. But they also saw it as a useful weapon against the much loathed Russians. But then, foreign policy is always a game of ‘enemy of your enemy is your friend’. FDR allied with Stalin against Hitler. Nixon met with Mao to use China against USSR.

Also, with the fading of religious faith, many young idealistic Jews decided to join the messianic movement of communism as their ticket into the modern world. Judaism no longer had much meaning for them, and Christianity was too much the faith of the enemy; furthermore, Christianity was also fading in the modern world. But many Jews loathed communism and radicalism as threat to tradition or bourgeois privilege, something Western European Jews had plenty of. Though Jews were more likely to take part in radical politics, there were powerful Jewish forces that did everything to oppose it or lent it support only selectively against certain enemies -- but then, it was the right-wing German government in World War I that sent Lenin back into Russia to stir up trouble. (Jewish Radical and Jewish Capital in the 20th Century didn't fully go head-to-head for two reasons. They had to work together to defeat Tsarist Russia, contain Nazi Germany, and topple WASP elites in the US and UK. Also, the rise of Zionism served as a quasi-fascist compromise between Jewish Capital and Jewish Radical as both agreed on the Jewish National Project. Eventually, with the fading of communism and bourgeois culture[of respectability] altogether, there was the Convergence of Jewish radical energies and Jewish capital excesses in the worship of the Holy Homo and Magic Mandingo.)

HAIL CAESAR! Foretaste of the Great Convergence or New Covenant of Jewish Capital and Jewish Radical in the Realm of the Tootkin-Fruitkin.

Similarly, many Jews have long had ambiguous feelings about Jesus, St Paul, and Christianity. In some ways, Jews regard Jesus and St Paul as traitors, renegade Jews, and heretics. Jesus and St Paul took the sacred Jewish fire and passed it to the filthy goyim who, once empowered by the Faith, came to persecute Jews as Christ-Killers. Jews have regarded Jesus and Paul like Zeus regarded Prometheus who stole fire from the gods and passed them to humans. Prometheus was 'crucified' too, albeit with an eagle than with a cross. And yet, Jews also feel immense pride in Jesus and Paul because those two Jews changed the world. Romans conquered tiny Judea, but a simple Man from Judea and a handful of His followers managed to conquer the souls of all Romans and beyond. That is tremendous prophetic power. Europeans were unable to produce their own prophets. In contrast, Arabs produced their own in the figure of Muhammad who, taking inspiration from Judaism and Christianity, came up with his own vision as the basis of a New Book. In contrast, European Christians came to worship a 'Jew on a stick', being unable or unwilling to come up with their own prophecy.

Whatever one thinks of Marx, Freud, Rand, and Leo Strauss, they thought bigly. Sure, there was the element of Jewish networking to promote Jewish thinkers, but that alone wouldn't have done it. Suppose the media expend lots of resources to promote Mexican or Polish-American thinkers. How many bold or exciting Mexican or Polish-American thinkers are there? Neocons were a bunch of a**holes, but one reason why William Buckley caved to them and why Paleo-Cons were swept aside was because Neocons thought bigly. Crazy but bigly. Jewish Mind has more Forward Thinking. In contrast, the goy Buckley-Mind saw history in terms of pleading, "Stop, please oh please" and goy Fukuyama-mind saw history as, "Gee, I think it stopped, didn't it?"
For Jews, history is a ongoing process of propheticism, and that is why they rule. It has something to do with higher IQ among Jews, but there is another factor. Jews have greater intellectual drive and will. After all, reason and logic alone are neutral and objective. They don't necessarily favor one side or one vision. To be prophetic, one has to tap into the energy source of the mind. It's been said East Asians have IQs comparable to white Europeans, and some East Asians are as smart as Jews. And given East Asian success in academics, one might expect them to produce the next batch of Big Thinkers, but where are the Asian Marxs, Freuds, Rands, Friedmans, Strausses, and etc? Though East Asians have proven themselves adept at learning and mastering established knowledge, they've been lackluster in coming up with new visions and revelations. Francis Fukuyama is maybe the most renowned Asian-American scholar, and the guy certainly has an encyclopedic knowledge about lots of things, but his main contribution to the discourse has been "It's all over, and Liberal Democracy won, and that's that." It's like the Tokugawa Dynasty calling for an end to all further progress and change in the conviction that it has reached the 'end of history' for Japan. As for white people, they've been highly talented in innovation, creativity, adventure, analysis, and enterprise, but they seem to lack the prophetic will(and the only people who somewhat had it, the Germans from Martin Luther to Adolf Hitler, totally immolated themselves).

HAIL CAESAR! Romans, the master conquerors of physical space.

HAIL CAESAR! Jews, the great conquerors of spiritual space.

Also, white people, with special roots in Greco-Roman and Germanic consciousness, tend to favor the actions of the body. Greeks and Romans erected countless tributes to physical health and beauty. They became masters of warfare and conquest. Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar were tireless conquerors. British were renowned for science and philosophy but also reveled in adventure, war, and conquest. They had a powerful martial culture. And the cowboy came to epitomize the American frontier spirit of the pioneer. White people developed a tremendous heritage in knowledge and thought, but their conquering spirit was expended on physical conflict, conquest, and domination. Indeed, body was for conquest, and the mind was for reflection and analysis. In contrast, Jews learned to conquer with the mind. As a race of rabbis and merchants, Jews didn't have much chance to play warrior, conqueror, and adventurer, unlike the fighting-and-dominating goy aristocratic classes of Europe. So, the conquering energies had to be expended within the cerebral and spiritual space of mind and soul. Surrounded by much bigger physical powers since ancient times, Jews knew they had no chance against them in one-on-one combat. But through the power of mind and will, Jews could imagine and own for themselves the greatest conception of God and then imagine peering through His eyes and hearing from His lips the prophecy of what must be. Thus, Jews developed the nuclear mind. In physics, we learn of different kinds of energy. Simple physical energy, more potent chemical energy, and ultimately nuclear energy. Mind works the same way. Most people use 'physical' energies for mundane thinking. Their minds don't function beyond 'what I want now'. The more advanced minds could be said to exercise 'chemical' energy. More sophisticated and educated, they use complex methodology and abstract concepts to solve problems or spark new ideas. And then, there are minds that have the combination of intellect, knowledge, will-to-power, and bigness of vision that can drop the bomb that changes history itself. Such men are rare, but a good number have been Jews in ancient and modern times. And the Arab Muhammad, who dropped a nuclear bomb of his own, was inspired by Jewish prophecy. Indeed, one could argue that even Germanic prophetic will was, in some ways, a reaction to the emergence of Jewish Will in the 19th century. No Jews, no Hitler. And Richard Wagner's great opera of DIE NIBELUNGEN was a Teutonic counter-prophecy against the Jewish Will to take over the world. Jews have atomic minds, and that's why their ideas blow away the competition. It's not necessarily because Jews are correct or sane but because they think bigly & boldly and also minutely & incisively. After all, the devil is in the details if you want to split hairs or split atoms. Einstein pondered everything from the biggest galaxies to the tiniest atoms.

In the end, those who conquer souls win over those who conquer bodies and lands. Alexander the Great conquered vast territories and spread Hellenic culture, but when his armies departed, it was as if they'd never been there. And Hellenic cultural influences, though beautiful and enticing, didn't inspire souls and faded away into nothingness. Same with the Mongols, among the greatest conquerors of all time. When they were on your land, you bowed and trembled in fear before them. But once they were gone, they left nothing but bitter memories that they were a bunch of a**holes. But consider the tremors of Islam that still reverberate in the lands it conquered. Why? Because Islam conquered souls that felt grateful for having been redeemed by the True Faith. And Christianity also had a long great run as a conqueror of souls in Europe and then around the world. This drive to conquer souls arose from Judaism that birthed Christianity and Islam, and it had to do with the prophetic will and the nuclear mindset. Just like no physical or chemical energy can match nuclear energy, no 'physical' mind or 'chemical' mind can match the 'nuclear' mind. Jews have the power to set off nuclear explosions of the mind that paradigmatically alter the landscape. Marxism was one of those nuclear explosions of the mind that changed the world.

Ultimately, communism was a double-edged sword for Jews in USSR. Initially, Jews had much to gain as many of them were in elite positions and as the New Order outlawed discrimination on basis of religion and ethnicity. Also, communism destroyed 50,000 Churches and wiped out much of the Orthodox clergy that was regarded by Jews as ‘antisemitism central’ and bastion of reaction.
But then, communism also put brakes and obstacles to Jewish success just as Marx had intended. Without accumulation of capital and all the things it could buy(such as media, entertainment, vice industries, whore politicians, real estate, and etc.), there was a limit to what Jews could do.
As communism was egalitarian, it prevented any group from rising way above all the others and accumulating limitless wealth. Also, the egalitarian ethos eventually led to massive 'affirmative action' policies that came to favor non-Jews over smarter Jews. Furthermore, the humanist-moralist element of communism made it difficult for Jews to use vice industry, gambling, advertising, drugs, and pornography to corrupt and control the goy masses with cults of vanity, hedonism, narcissism, and degeneracy. So, in the long run, it was a net loss for Jews under communism. It was with mastery of capitalism(especially in the US) that Jewish Power came to inherit the world. And it is this power of Tribal-Capital and 'testicular fortitude' in Prophecy that keep Jews far ahead in the field of dreams.

Jews have often said "My Jewish Relatives Died in the Holocaust" — We must ask, "What Else Did Your Jewish Relatives Do?" — Let’s Consider the Historical Record

Margaret Hodge, the Vile Vicious Jewess: "My relatives were murdered in the gas chamber’: Jewish Labour MP defends calling Corbyn a ‘f***ing anti-Semite" 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/07/28/labours-gas-chamber-blues-pink-berets-vs-fing-anti-semites/

The above is a very instructive article about the nature of Jewish Power, Duplicity, and Mendacity in the UK, but the article could apply to just about any nation in which Ashkenazi Jews have gained prominence. As a more self-aware Jew Yossi Sarid has said, “In these very moments, the protocols are being rewritten. Rich Jews are writing them in their own handwriting. They, in their wealth, are confirming with their own signatures what anti-Semites used to slander them with in days gone by: We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress, and the congressmen are nothing but marionettes who do our will. If they don’t understand our words, they’ll understand our threats. And if in the past, we ran the show from behind the scenes, now we’re doing it openly, from center stage. And if you forget our donations, the wellspring will run dry.” For much of my life, I thought ‘antisemitism’ was mostly a canard, and to be sure, there have been many anti-Jewish cranks and fantasists over the years. But upon observing Jewish Power in the here-and-now all around the world, I’ve been led to conclude that, all said and done, the ‘anti-Semites’ tended to be more right than wrong. They understood the character of Jewish Psychology and Culture and why Jews act the way they do. As these ethnic patterns have re-emerged over and over regardless of ideology — Jewish Leftists or Jewish Rights are equally subversive of the essential interests of non-Jewish populations — , critics and enemies of Jewish Power through the ages were more about facts than fantasy. And in a way, precisely because Jews have gained dominance in the US, the most powerful nation on Earth, and can’t restrain their chutzpah with too-much-money-and-power, more and more people everyday are waking up to the toxic impacts of Jewish arrogance, greed, venality, hatred, contempt, and supremacism. (That is precisely why Jews now HATE FREE SPEECH. Any honest discussion in an open forum will expose the ugly and pathological nature of Current Jewish Power. This is why Jews rig all search engines and platforms to favor Jew-concocted narratives. This is why Jews dumb-down and infantilize even elite culture because a thinking people who ask hard questions will come to see Jewish Power for what it is. Better for Jewish Power to turn Elites into Homo-Worshipers who stick with Jewish Power because it is seen as most homo-friendly.) It seems all the more perverse and weird because these Judeo-Nazis still(albeit increasingly comically) invoke the Shoah to cover up for their utter vileness. It’s like Madeleine Albright, the butcher of Iraq, giving us sermons about the dangers of ‘fascism’ taking over the US. These Jews got some nerves.


Anyway, one oft-repeated shtick pulled by Jews is to remind people that their RELATIVES died in the Shoah or were ‘Holocaust Survivors’, a term that has become nearly meaningless as it could apply to just about any Jew who lived in areas under German control during the war. When most people hear ‘Holocaust Survivor’, they think of people like in SCHINDLER’S LIST, men, women, and children who managed to make it out alive of Nazi Concentration Camps. But the term is so broadly defined that it could mean even Jews who lived with relative comfort in areas of German Occupation. While we can acknowledge that all Jews under German Occupation lived under severe duress and anxiety, it’s ridiculous to label as ‘Holocaust Survivor’ someone who was not even in the notorious Labor or Death Camps devised by the Nazis. In some nations, where the hunt for Jews was so extensive, such as in Poland and Hungary, one could argue that the entire Jewish population there were Holocaust Survivors. But the term becomes a stretch in nations where the great majority of Jews not only survived, not least because the local population resisted collaboration with the Germans. Even in Occupied France where Collaboration was commonplace, the fact is 75% of French Jews managed to survive the war.

Anyway, when Jews say "My relatives survived or died in the Holocaust", it gives a very skewed view of history. It implicitly surveys the world where Jews have been nothing but innocent victims of malevolent forces. It ignores context and other narratives. It’s like Japanese saying "My relatives survived Hiroshima or Nagasaki or Tokyo firebombing" while totally ignoring what their OTHER relatives may have done in China, Indonesia, and against the US naval fleet in Pearl Harbor. While many ‘innocent’ or ‘civilian’ Japanese were cruelly killed in WWII at the hands of the US Air Force, there was ANOTHER side to Japan’s role in the war. Japan was also an imperialist aggressor that visited unimaginable horrors upon China, Philippines, Indonesia, and etc. Also, Japan attacked the US first. So, while a Japanese wouldn’t be wrong to say that he or she knows relatives who were cruelly killed in the war, it’s also probably true that he or she has relatives who took part in the horrific Japanese Imperialist aggressions against other nations. He or she has relatives who were victims but also those who were villains(and in some cases, people can be villains and victims at the same time; surely Japanese colonists who were attacked by Chinese patriots were both villains[as imperialist migrants] and victims[of local acts of terror]).

While it may well be true that many Jews can claim to know relatives who were killed in the Holocaust or barely survived it, it’s no less true that many Jews have relatives who took part in some of the great crimes of the 20th century. When Jews say, "My relatives died in the Holocaust", we need to ask them, "What did your relatives do in Soviet Union? How many Christian Slavs did they kill? How many Christian Churches did they smash?" It’s now largely agreed that in the first two decades of Soviet Rule, close to 10 million people perished. Before Nazi Germany edged out the Soviet Union in industrial slaughter, the USSR was the international kingpin when it came to mass mayhem and destruction. And Jewish Bolsheviks played a huge role in the use of terror, slavery, and execution to bring about this so-called Workers’ Paradise. Many Jews took part in this State ruled by Fear and Terror. Many Jews were directly involved in the running of this state at the highest levels. But there were also many Jews in the West who indirectly aided the Soviet project, totally oblivious and indifferent to the death and destruction caused by Soviet Jews on the Slavic and other populations. Not only did millions die of starvation in Ukraine, but it’s estimated that a quarter of the population perished in Kazakhstan. And even for ones who didn’t die, there was the culture of tyranny and conformism, of total censorship and obedience, perhaps most powerfully satirized by George Orwell in 1984. If Soviet Jews in the USSR were controlling the media to spread propaganda to justify the Terror, Western Jews in the media did their best to deny that the Terror was even taking place. When millions of Slavic peasants were dying in the Great Famine, the great majority of Jews in the USSR and the West felt NOTHING. No pity, no heartache, no remorse. Indeed, Jews began to notice something wrong only with the Great Purge that targeted Soviet intellectuals and commissars. The Great Famine that killed millions had been about dirty goy peasants, so good riddance to them, thought the Jews. But the Great Purge targeted the class in which Jews were prominent. Even though the Great Purge, in killing around 450,000, was far less deadly than the Great Famine, it was the first time Jews began to wonder about the wisdom of the Soviet system. (But then, it’s always "Is it good for the Jews?" when it comes to Jewish ‘ethics’. We saw the same pattern in the US. For the longest time, Americans were led to believe that the Red Scare was the worst violation of civil liberties in the US when, in fact, it only led to the blacklisting of some Hollywood writers and folk singers for a few yrs. In contrast, the ‘internment’ of Japanese-in-America led to dispossession and relocation of over 100,000 people. So, why did the Jew-run media and academia care more about the victims of the Red Scare? It affected areas in which Jews were prominent.) As it turned out, the Great Purge didn’t end Jewish Power in the USSR. While Stalin removed most Jews from the highest echelons of power, many Jews(way disproportionate to their overall population) remained in the Soviet apparatus and continued to serve Stalin in his use of terror and mass executions to deal with ‘class enemies’.

At any rate, we need to stop playing the Jewish Game. When Jews bitch and whine ever so predictably, "My relatives blah blah blah...", we need to counter with the question, "What did your relatives do as commissars in the Soviet Union? What did your relatives do as Zionist Imperialists who wiped Palestine off the map?" And don’t let Jews bait you about ‘white racism’. Jews played a huge role in the Atlantic Slave Trade. And Jewish merchants sold guns to whites to kill Indians with on the Western frontier. So, if whites are guilty of American Slavery and American Genocide, so are the Jews. Also, so much of Western Imperialism was funded by Jewish bankers. And wherever whites conquered, Jews followed and profited. When the British Empire made inroads into China, the Jews were there to peddle opium to the Chinese. And in recent times, you bet that many relatives of Jews were involved in promoting Wars for Israel via the academia, media, Deep State, and finance. If you know a Jew, he will likely have Jewish relatives who took part in the Nakba pogroms, the Zionist occupation of West Bank, Neocon Wars for Israel(that killed close to a million people and reduced millions more to ‘refugee’ status), Jewish Rape of Russia in the 1990s that destroyed millions of lives, global White Slavery(in which Jews cajole mostly poor Slavic women into becoming sex slaves), Jewish control of Porn(where mostly white women are turned into ‘cumbuckets’ and sex meat for Negro men), and Cuck-castration of white men that has gelded white males into a bunch of wussy-pussified ‘white boys’ who suck up to Negroes who beat them up and hump their women. So, whenever some smarmy Jew bleats about "my relative blah blah Holocaust blah blah", you ask him about his OTHER relatives and what role they played in Soviet terror, Rape of Russia, Nakba pogroms, Opium trade, Slave trade, funding of imperialism, Wall Street mass theft, Las Vegas robbery, Opioid epidemic, pornification of society, cuck-castration of whites into wussy-boys who don’t even have the balls to stand up for their own people, land, and culture. According to Jews, whites own nothing that is their own. Everything white exists to serve Jews. So, if there is a white nation, the white people have no right to think, "We are white, this is our nation, this is our culture, and it belongs to us." No, they must think, "We whites have no culture and no identity. We exist to make Jews happy and must do anything to facilitate this... or else, we are Nazis or ‘anti-Semites’. And since we exist to serve the Other, the Jews, we must also put All the Others before our own interest. So, the UK is no longer the land of Britons, the real White Britons but must prioritize itself as a welcome mat for endless migration-invasions of Africans, Muslims, and Asians. Accordingly, white Britons exist only to make the rest of the world happy by welcoming them to take over white lands, white institutions, and even white women so that Negro men can colonize white wombs to create mulattos who identify as ‘black’ and accuse white people of ‘racism’. Yes, this is what the Relatives of Jews are up to.

So, next time you meet a Jew who whines about how his or her ‘relatives died in the Holocaust’, you ask him or her about what his or her OTHER relatives have done to the world. Here’s a sample of what the OTHER Jewish relatives have done:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Of course, as Jewish ethno-monopoly controls the internet, if you search for Jewish malfeasance, you mostly get search results that lead to Jewish-owned media outlets bitching about how it is ‘antisemitic’ to connect the dots between Jewish Power and Jewish abuses, such as the Financial Crisis.

https://www.google.com/search?q=jews+and+wall+street+finanical+crisis&rlz=1C1AOHY_enUS768US768&oq=jews+and+wall+street+finanical+crisis&aqs=chrome..69i57.14211j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Having turned ‘antisemitism’ into a taboo word, Jews can deflect responsibility for anything they do just by invoking the magic term. So, if a bunch of Jews beat up a Palestinian child to death and if you report what you saw, you can are denounced as an ‘anti-Semite’ for having mouthed an ‘antisemitic’ stereotype of Jews as exploitative oppressors. The way ‘antisemitism’ is employed, it means any observation or view that is critical of Jewish power and its abuses. According to this logic, Jews have always been pure as snow and blameless, and that means every negative aspersion about Jews all through the ages was wrong, wrong, and wrong, merely paranoia cooked up by ‘rabid and virulent’ looneys. So, if Jews were always right and ‘anti-Semites’ were always wrong, then it means that if YOU notice something bad about Jews in the here-and-now, YOU too are an ‘anti-Semite’ who is perpetuating the old ‘canard’ about blameless and pure-as-snow Jews. Of course, the Jew-run media are more than happy to prop up the Jewish Myth of Jewish Nobility even as Jewish elites collude behind the scenes to rake in everything for their own Tribe.
Even when Jews rob the entire world and cause havoc for all of mankind, the Jew-run media will tell us that Jews are saving the World. What a truly vile and wretched people.

Finally, Jews need to stop bitching about how OTHER nations didn't do enough to save Jews from the Shoah. Jews need to be more self-aware and ask themselves why (1) Germans came to hate Jews so much and (2) why other nations didn't care much about Jews.
The answer is obvious. Jews built up a reputation over the ages of being a vile, nasty, and subversive people. If Jews hadn't been such rapacious financial exploiters(on the capitalist side), such ruthless radicals(on the socialist side), and such degenerates(on the cultural front), there never would have been much in the way of 'antisemitism'. Just because Jews suffered the horrible Shoah doesn't cleanse Jews of their foulness, just like the horrific nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki doesn't expunge Japanese of their crimes in WWII. After the war, Japanese came to realize that they'd done terrible things but also came to be terribly victimized. There was some balance in Japan's remembrance of the war. But Jews remember 20th century only as 'We pure-as-snow Jews wronged by the world'. Jews think they have some divine right to mess up any part of the world, and if the local population rise up against Jews, OTHER nations must offer Jews refuge so that Jews can start the foul pattern of subversion all over again.
Even when the Soviet Experiment went badly for Jews in the end, Jews lacked the self-awareness to admit that THEIR project had failed them(and led to deaths of millions of Slavs and others). Instead, the Jew-run media spun it into SAVE SOVIET JEWS as if the Jews were always the main victims of Soviet Communism. Such lack of self-awareness. A hideous people. And yet, they rule the US and the world.

The Dirty Canard of Conflating Blood-and-Soil with Nazism

One of the biggest canards in the current discourse(approaching hysteria, or hyscourse) is that Blood and Soil is about Nazism.

If Nazism was really about Blood and Soil, there wouldn't have been WWII. Germans would have been proud and content to be German in their own beloved nation-state. And there would have been peace with other nations. The very notion of Blood and Soil didn't begin with Nazis. It goes back to the 19th century when Modern Germany was coming into being under the leadership of Bismarck. And blood-and-soil was a sound formula for creating a nation. The idea was that Modern Germany should incorporate territories populated by German peoples. It meant Germany should lay claim to German territories, no more and no less. Granted, it didn't work out perfectly as some Germans remained in non-German lands and Germany had some non-Germans, but the core vision was valid on moral, political, and pragmatic grounds. It was nationalist, not imperialist. Blood and Soil meant Germans of shared blood should unite German territories. It didn't make claims on Spain, Italy, Balkans, Greece, Russia, and etc.

If anything, the troubles that set off WWI, the Great War, began in Austro-Hungarian Empire that dismissed the blood-and-soil guidelines. In the end, the troublesome Diversity made it more like bloods-and-the-crips.
As Austro-Germans ruled over different peoples, there was a lot of resentment and hostility(that went both ways). It was hardly surprising that Hitler was the product of Austria than Prussia.

Blood-and-Soil is a great idea. When practiced by the Japanese, there was peace with Asian neighbors. But as a new imperialist power, Japan invaded China. In other words, Japanese imperialists violated the principle of blood-and-soil by invading and colonizing other nations. Chinese anger boiled over, and Asia blew up. And what were the Chinese fighting for? Why did the KMT and CCP, though bitter political foes, come together? Because despite their ideological differences, they were united in the blood-and-soil patriotism of China for Chinese.
And the great postwar anti-imperialist struggles were all about blood-and-soil. Kenyans and Indians told the British to go home. Algerians and Vietnamese told the French to do likewise. Indonesians told the Dutch to get lost. Granted, some of these new nations were the inorganic geographic creations of European imperialism beset with problems of diversity, but they all wanted the European imperialists to go home. And both the US and USSR, as supporters of national liberation and anti-imperialism, appealed to the Third World. Indeed, the US accused the USSR of crushing the nationalist dreams of Hungarians. And the USSR accused the US of imperialism against the Vietnamese patriots.

So, the universal consensus was that the Third World peoples have a right to organize their own nations on the basis of blood-and-soil. And as the European imperialists returned home, they were also back into the blood-and-soil mode. And this was great template for world stability and peace.

The idea of fatherland and folk is nationalist. Even though Nazis invoked those concepts, Germany was not not destroyed by them nor were other nations invaded & destroyed in their name. Those concepts were not the basis for the wars, invasions, and genocide.
When Hitler was taking back Rhineland, it only seemed right. It was Germans reclaiming a part of Germany. When Austro-Germans wanted to unite with Germany, it was Germans unifying with ethnic Germans, and the vast majority of Austrians supported it. When Germans gained control of German-heavy Sudetenland, the world could see justice in that. The problem began when Hitler got crazy with ambitions beyond the fatherland and was no longer content with being fuhrer of his folk. He wanted the fatherland to rape the motherlands of other nations. And his empire would rule over other folks who were not German and had their own identities and heritages.

The association of WWII with nationalism and blood-and-soil is a canard that must end. If anything, Nazis were defeated by the true nationalism of other nations. All resistances to Nazism were essentially nationalist. Czechs wanted to be free again. Poles hated German rule. Russians feared being wiped out and losing motherland forever. This was a time when even the left was fiercely nationalist.

In Poland, the resistance was mostly right-wing because the rightist government refused to collaborate with Germans. Germany invaded Poland, and then leftist Soviets invaded too. So, the Polish Right became the main patriotic fighters. But in other nations, the right-wing regimes collaborated with Germany, and so, the resistance was bound to come from the Left. But even this Left that gained power after WWII was essentially nationalist, especially after suspected Internationalist-Zionists were purged in the late 40s and 50s.

This attack on blood-and-soil is ironic because the detractors, mainly Jewish, are totally for blood and soil in Israel. Zionism is about blood-and-soil. To emigrate to Israel, one has to be of Jewish blood. And Israel has pro-Jewish natal policies. And Jews wanted to reclaim that piece of territory because it's holy to them on grounds of history and religion.

So, why do Jews, who zealously support blood-and-soil in Israel, oppose it so rabidly and virulently when it comes to gentile nations? Consider the sheer hatred and hostility directed at Poland and Hungary for their simple insistence that Poland belongs to Poles and Hungary belongs to Hungarians. Now, who, in his right mind, thinks that such blood-and-soil sentiments are going to lead to WWIII and massive genocides? I mean seriously.
 It was imperialism and universalism that led to wars and conquests. Imperialists wanted to rule over other peoples to exploit resources and expand their own power. Universalists like communists wanted to spread the radical fire all over the world. Soviet Union was an empire based on a universal idea. Who grieves its passing from history?
The breakup of the Soviet Empire was all about blood-and-soil. Non-Russians got weary of living under the Great Russian yoke. And didn't the US praise the fall of the Soviet empire and the rise of new national republics?

So, why this hostility to blood-and-soil when Jews love it for Israel. Not only do they support it themselves but demand that all goyim in US, EU, Canada, and Australia also support the Right of Israel to survive as a Jewish State.

Of course, we know why. It's not because Jews fear another Shoah or WWIII. It's because they are now the great imperialist power in the world via networks of finance, media, academia, entertainment, and deep state and their control of US as superpower. So, even as Jews love blood-and-soil for Israel, they see such as a barrier and obstacle for Jewish-globalist penetration and takeover in other nations. Deep in their hearts, Jews feel that they, as the smarter and prouder people, should have elite control of other nations, especially in the White World.

WWII turned uglier and uglier because of Hitler's imperialist and ultimately genocidal Lebensraum idea. German ambition to rule over non-Germans set Europe on fire and led to the massive conflagration.
Today, if any power is acting Nazi-like, it's Jewish globalism. Why can't Jews see this? Are they so morally full of themselves as Eternal Victims of the Holocaust that they've become blind to their own evil? Are they so power-hungry that they've become nihilistic and amoral?

Let's look at recent history. Was blood-and-soil the basis of the terrible economic Rape of Russia in the 90s? Was blood-and-soil the basis of wars in Iraq, Libya, and Syria? (As I recall, 'no blood for oil' was closer to the truth.)

No, if those nations had maintained their sovereignty, the ensuing tragedies could have been avoided. It was globalist imperialism, disproportionately controlled by Jewish elements, that led to one disaster after another. Disasters that destroyed millions of lives.

Now, it's somewhat understandable why Jews want America to be a world power than a mere nation. The Jewish Narrative says Jews were helpless under the Nazis because the world wouldn't do anything to defeat the evil Nazis. So, 'isolationist' America First meant Americans minding their own business while the Nazi empire expanded over Europe and hunted down Jews. (But then, Jews never insisted that the US must do something to save Ukrainians from Stalin or Armenians from the Turks. And I can't imagine Jewish parents sacrificing their sons to fight in wars to save OTHER peoples. Indeed, isn't it telling that so many American Jews would rather serve in the IDF than in the US military? If they must kill or die, it's for Israel.) So, the Nazi Empire could only be defeated by other empires. If US remained in nationalist mode, it might not meddle in world affairs and do something about the evil Nazis. Only in empire-mode would the US act as a hegemon and take on other empires, such as that of Nazi Germany. And indeed, it was the rise of US as a military-industrial empire that allied with the USSR to defeat Nazi Germany.
But Jews are overlooking one crucial point. Germany became dangerous not because of its blood-and-soil or fatherland/folk mentality. It was the shift to imperialist mode that turned Germany from a nation to an empire. So, even if it's true that Imperial US defeated Nazi Germany, it was not a war on German nationalism but on German imperialism. In other words, if Germans had remained in nationalist mode, there never would have been a need for the the clash of empires to set things straight. Furthermore, the US had to revive German nationalism to some degree in the postwar era to push back against Soviet imperial power.
Also, what got Americans into the war? It was nationalist passion, not imperial ambition. Americans got riled up with patriotic fervor only when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
After the war, if not for the Cold War, most Americans would have preferred return to nationalist America where 'business of America is business'. It was the Cold War that transformed the US into an Empire, so much so that even after the Cold War, the US kept cooking up new rationales to keep Empire Inc. going. And what has this led to? Disasters in Korea and Vietnam. Bad blood with Iran and Central America. Big headaches in Latin America. And total disaster in the Middle East. A crazy 'new cold war' with Russia that would make no sense but for the egotism of a certain ethnic group and gluttony of the War State.
Sometimes, "you are what you defeat".
The great irony is the America that moved into empire mode to defeat the Three Evil Empires of Japanese Militarism, Nazism, and Soviet Communism ended up becoming intoxicated with its own power. And especially when Jews became the new ruling elites and couldn't resist riding the Iron Horse of America to run roughshod over the world, America in the 21st century became, sad to say, an Evil Nation, or worse, an Evil Empire. When the Cold War ended under the tutelage of two great men, Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, it could have been the dawning of a great era. But America, which had reluctantly moved into imperial mode to defeat or contain the Evil Empires, gloated in its triumph and began to see the entire world as its backyard. It went from seeing empire as a necessary evil to an essential feature of Americanism. America became what it defeated. And people like John Kerry and Hillary? Counterculture became The Man.

Anyway, while we can understand why Jews see the American Empire as the essential savior of Jews from both Nazis and ultimately the Soviets(who turned against Zionism) -- a more complicated matter because so many Jews had been initially pro-Soviet and against the Anglo-Right-wing 'paranoia' that set off the Cold War against the USSR, the great power that defeated the Nazis, until they realized that mediocritist communism doesn't do much for Jews -- , it's foolish to analyze the present and future based on past realities. Jews no longer need America to save Jews from horrors around the world. Despite Neocon scare-mongering, the world is not full of 'new hitlers' and 'new stalins', and even if such exist, Jews are not in their harm's way.

Jews are now addicted to America-as-empire to gain dominance over other peoples. And if so many gentiles, especially Muslims, get mangled and slaughtered due to American aggression, Jews don't care. And if many Russians are harmed by sanctions, again, no concern among Jews. 'Save Soviet Jews' was somewhat understandable due to blatant discrimination against Jews and also because there wasn't much freedom for anyone in the communist system. But Jews have it so nice in the Current Russia where Putin goes out of his way to ensure the well-being of the Jewish community. So, why is there more hostility against Russia today than in the past? Because Jews are no longer worried about survival. They are addicted to power like crack or cocaine. They want the American Empire not as a stretcher to save Jews but as a hammer to threaten or crush any nation or people standing in the way of Jewish hegemony.

Trumpism, if not so much Trump(who keeps shape-shifting), is about America as a nation than empire. Considering that both Germany and Japan become most dangerous as empires than as nations, it would seem that the lesson of WWII is that a nation should take care of itself, mind its own business, and meddle less in other nations.

Also, if it's wrong to invade and colonize other nations, it's worse to allow the invasion of one's own nation. This massive immigration-invasion wasn't wanted by the American people. It was imposed from above as decree. When people rejected the invasion by votes, the elites used the power of courts run by whores of globalism and commissars of PC.
SOME non-white immigrants add to the color of a nation. But TOO MANY is a full-blown invasion. It's like SOME Jewish settlers in Palestine made the place more interesting. But TOO MANY Jews turned Palestinians into People 1.0 to be replaced by People 2.0. If it was tragic for Palestine, why wouldn't it be for Europe and America? And I don't want to hear this stuff about America being different because it was founded as a proposition. If so, why are the globalists pushing the SAME PLAN on Europe and even Japan? But not on Israel?

The lesson of WWII is that Germans failed morally & politically and committed great horrors because they betrayed the ideal of blood-and-soil, of fatherland and folk. They should have minded their own business in their own blood-and-soil nation. Instead, they stole the soils of other people and bloodied them all over.

Gee, I wonder which nation acts like that today? Poland? Hungary? Iran? Which nation could that be? And who are the ruling elites of that nation?