Using the Covid-29 crisis to push nationalism against globalism is good and sound.
Oddly enough however, so-called nationalists in the West are attacking Chinese Nationalism. But if Chinese being nationalist is wrong, it then follows that nationalism itself is wrong. And that means West shouldn't be nationalist like China(and Russia)... which is self-defeating to nationalists.
China used globalism for nationalist purposes. It believes in China First.
And Western nations should use the World Order for their own national interests.
But when people in the West attack Chinese nationalism, they are attacking nationalism itself. It's like Tucker Carlson denouncing China for being 'ethno-nationalist'. Funny coming from someone who opposes immigration on grounds that all of US will turn into California. (But his confused or hypocritical self is full of praise for Zionist ethno-imperialism.)
Russia has shown that a nation can be nationalist and work with China. China has never been opposed to other nations being nationalist. China and Russia get along despite tensions(historical and geopolitical) because both understand and respect each other: Russia uses the alliance for Russian interests, China uses the alliance for Chinese interests. Russia is okay with Chinese nationalism, China is okay with Russian nationalism... as long as neither goes imperialist on the other.
So, why not follow the Russian model? What does Russia do? It pursues Russian nationalism without denouncing Chinese nationalism. That way, Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism can co-exist side by side. They can hammer out differences and compromise on certain matters on basis of mutual understanding.
The problem isn't Chinese nationalism or even Chinese globalism. Pakistan and Iran are far less rich and powerful than the US, but they maintain their sovereignty vis-a-vis China. They trade and cooperate on certain interests without surrendering their power to China. Even impoverished North Korea(with 1/40th of the economy of South Korea) has managed to do its own thing in defiance of China.
But we are to believe that the rich and mighty West has been helpless to stop Chinese power and influence? ROTFL. True, Chinese business interests have moved aggressively into Canada and Australia, but whose fault is that? Anglos turned into a bunch of worthless cucks who measure everything in terms of money and 'woke' virtue-signaling about 'muh diversity'.
What did Sun Tzu say in the Art of War? Power is like water. It generally runs into open spaces. So, when Anglo nations went cucky-wuck and opened themselves to Chinese people and money, guess where a lot of people and money went? China didn't forcibly invade the West(like the West once did against China). Rather, Canada and Australia freely opened themselves up to Chinese people and money(as well as to Hindus, Arabs, and even thuggish Sudanese blacks).
But why did Anglos go from proudly race-ist and nationalist — Canada and Australia used to have WHITE ONLY immigration policies — to globalist, 'anti-racist', cucky-wuck, and pro-diversity? Why did Anglos allow Africans and Muslims to take over entire parts of London? Because Mao sent his Red Guard hordes to conquer them? Because Jackie China and Bruce Lee's ghost led an army of kung fu warriors to invade the West? No, because Anglos let Jews take over the West, and Jew filled white minds with 'white guilt', jungle fever, self-loathing, diversity-mania, and 'muh restaurant' lunacy.
Jews made Anglos cuck to the Other(the Primary Other being Jews of course). Once Anglos got into the habit of cucking to Jews, it was only a matter of time before other groups followed the Jewish Lead: Chinese, Hindus, Arab Sheiks, illegals from Latin America, the African invasion, etc. They all learned to chant 'diversity' and 'racism' to gain increased entry into the rich and clean West. And as white minds were colonized by Jewish PC, whites just nodded along. Keep in mind that until Donald Trump came along, 'nationalism' was a dirty word among nearly all Western elites, intellectuals, journalists, and managerial class.
Russia showed what a nation can do. Russia partly regained national sovereignty from Jewish globalist oligarchs. It has operated on basis of nationalism(relative to the rest of Europe) since. So, when it deals with China, it is on the basis of Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism respecting each other. Russia doesn't have to vilify China, and China doesn't have to vilify Russia.
But US, Canada, UK, and Australia are without Anglo sovereignty. Anglos(like Derbyshire himself) are sorry cucks to Jewish Globalists. If Anglos had sense, they wouldn't opt for anti-Sinicism. Rather, they would argue that white nations must be like China, Russia, and Iran in regaining national sovereignty and operating on the basis of national interest. This can be done without anti-Chinese rhetoric as Russia proved. Initially, China respected Trump as a tough-talking nationalist. Chinese nationalism can work with other nationalisms. Alas, Trump turned into just a cuck to Jews who talks nationalism but engages in continued US globo-homo hegemonism and imperialism. (Also, as Deep State operatives are addicted to the hyper-power game of globalist-imperialism, they despise nationalism as 'small potatoes'. For them, the only game that matters is the globalist contest of world domination. So, instead of envisioning a future where American Nationalism and Chinese Nationalism co-exist peacefully, they can only think in terms of American globalist supremacism vs Chinese globalist supremacism. They project their own supremacism onto others. It's like Jews project all their pathology onto Russia. The difference is China wants to trade with the world but has no interest in spreading 'Chinese values' or 'Chinese ideology', whereas American missionary impulse, Anglo imperial-adventurism, and Jewish supremacism are addicted to transforming the entire world.)
It's weird how Anglo nations are many times richer than Russia(that is strong in military but weak in economy) but politically many times weaker. The West is like one big Hong Kong under British Rule: Rich but a puppet of the Brits. Today, Anglo nations are rich but political and ideological colonies of Jews. When China deals with Russia, it is with a second-rate economic power but a first-rate political power. When China deals with the West, it is with a first-rate economic power but a third-rate political power. Just look at Justin Trudeau or the female leader of New Zealand. Even tough-talking Trump regularly takes it up the ass from Jews and acted as their hitman in the murder of hero Soleimani, the Iranian patriot who's been battling terrorists in Syria. All such Western goy politicians are mere tools and puppets of Jews. But Jews are so powerful that they can hide their power, and goy-cucks play along with the hope that, if they suck up to Jews just one more time, Jews will be nice to them. So, white 'liberals' blame Russia for everything, and white 'conservatives' blame China for everything. Jewish Power manipulates and corrupts US politics, but we had three long years of Russia Collusion nonsense. Jews control US institutions, but we now get 'China Inc or Chinc. controls everything'. It's downright hysterical.
There was a time when the West was both a first-rate political and first-rate economic power. White Christian elites ruled, and they were united as one people with white Christian masses. But over time, Jews took over, and white elites became managerial cucks serving the Jewish globo-homo agenda. And white masses were to be replaced by White Nakba, race-mixed with jungle fever & bamboo fever, and/or killed off with opioids(sold by Jews who once sold opium to the Chinese). Then, the cure is obvious: White Liberation from Jewish supremacism. Unity of white elites and white masses. Nationalism like in Hungary. But we hear NONE of this from the likes of Tucker Carlson. All we get is blaming China for globalism that is really the tool of Jews. The truth is China is prepared to deal with nationalist white nations. Rise of nationalism in White Nations may be disadvantageous to China in certain areas, but Chinese are not ones to tell white nations what to do. (The 'woke' anti-white Chinese in the West are the products of Western PC media and academia controlled by Jews. Chinese in China tend to despise the 'white left'.) They will adapt to the new reality. The one group that is most hostile to revival of nationalism in white nations is the Jews. This is why Jews are now urging whites not to restore nationalism in white nations but to attack Chinese nationalism as the source of globalism's problems. By blaming Chinese NATIONALISM, snuff nationalism in the West as well.
The problem is Anglos are doing NOTHING about the source of US enslavement to globalism: Jewish Power. If anything, they are pretending China is the master of globalism and forced globalism on the West. This is total nonsense. Jews pushed globalism on the West. Jews urged big business in the West to dump on their own workers and send factories to Mexico & China and outsource to India. Jews in Silicon Valley invited all those Hindus. Jewish New York Times hires Hindu and Chinese 'woke' scholars to dump on whites. China didn't create this World Order but merely took part in it. Also, despite all the corruption and brutality of current China, it did make real products and shipped them to other nations, which did a helluva lot more for the world than Jews in Wall Street making trillions via financial manipulation.
If Anglos followed the Putinist model, they could bring back white pride and white-majority nationalism in the West. And then, they could deal with China on the basis of mutual respect. If China currently doesn't respect whites, it's because whites cuck to Jews. Chinese know Jews rule the West. And as whites are cucks of Jews, whites adopted Open Borders and can't say NO to mass immigration-invasion. So, if whites want pride and power back, they must come to terms with Jewish Power. But whites are so in awe of Jews(and so frightened of them) that they are in Alex Jones mode: Jones was deplatformed by Jews but blames the 'Chicoms' for his woes, perhaps in the hope that if he grovels before Jews by blaming everything on China, his accounts will be restored in Jewish-monopolistic platforms.
Whites must blame Jews for globalism. Whites must restore nationalism and white identity by pushing back against Jewish Power. But people like Tucker Carlson and John Derbyshire suck up to Jews... even though Jews hate them most. (It's like Jared Taylor has been denied Twitter and Paypal by Jews, but the fool censors anyone who speaks truth to Jewish Power at American Renaissance.) Jews even fund Antifa that went to Carlson's house and threatened his family. Derbyshire has been de-personed in journalism because Jews smeared him as 'white supremacist'.
Instead of confronting Jews to regain white identity and white-majority nationalism, whites are attacking Chinese nationalism. White 'conservatives' attack Chinese nationalism and white 'liberals' attack Russian nationalism. But if nationalism is bad, then it must be bad for the West too. But if nationalism is bad for China, Russia, and the West, how do we counter and control globalism?
White people need to restore nationalism and come to terms with Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism(and Iranian nationalism and etc), but instead they blame China for globalism while being utterly amnesiac about the fact that the West embarked on globalism that was created by Jews and Anglo-traitors. If whites don't restore nationalism and merely blame China for globalism, then the result will be continued globalism, especially as the REAL source of globalism goes unmentioned: Jewish Power.
Also, if the West is to pursue nationalism, it must give up on imperialism. It is downright hypocritical for the West to bitch about China(and Russia) when the US and NATO invaded and destroyed nations in Middle East and North Africa in Wars for Israel. It is Trump, tool of Jews, who is interfering in Venezuela. Also, how many Chinese naval bases surround the US? How many US military bases surround China? Who created the mess in Ukraine by instigating a coup?
Wittingly or not, John Derbyshire is merely a shill of Jewish globalists who are trying to blame China for the World Order that Jews have created. If nations like US, Canada, and Australia were to go nationalist and ban further Chinese immigration and investment, China will accept the policies and learn to live with them. It is Jews who will go crazy and denounce white nations as 'racist', 'xenophobic', and 'nazi' at the slightest whiff of white majority interests. It's the Jews and castrated white cucks who insist that even the sentiment "It's Okay to be White" is 'racist'. Has China or Russia denounced Viktor Orban and Hungary? No, all the hatred comes from Jews, and those Jews are well-served by Anglo-cucks who now bark like dogs at the feet of their Jewish masters.
We've been told by the Jewish-controlled and cuck-managed media and academia that the greatest 'sin' is 'racism'. Now, if by 'racism', they mean blind and mindless hatred and hostility toward other races based on ignorance, arrogance, and contempt, I would agree. But we must ask why Race + Ism has been defined in such manner. 'Ism' means belief, therefore Race + Ism = Belief in the Reality of Race and Racial Differences and/or the need for Racial Consciousness. Race-ism should mean belief and conviction in certain facts, ideas, and principles associated with racial realities. It shouldn't mean the worst possible extreme and radical manifestation of that particular belief system. After all, being a Christian means one embraces the Faith and accepts Jesus as one's savior. Christianity has ranged from extreme theocracy to something approaching New Age flakiness. There have been hardline Christians, moderate Christians, tolerant Christians, and progressive Christians who reinterpret the Bible in startling ways. So, there is no single way to be Christian. But suppose someone defined Christianity by its most extreme expressions and actions. It'd be ridiculous. It'd be like defining 'socialism' by pointing to Stalinism, Maoism, and Khmer-Rouge-ism. But in fact, there have been other forms of socialism that weren't tyrannical and ruthless/murderous. Then, how does it make sense to define 'racism' or 'race-ism' only by the extreme actions of the KKK, Nazis, or Nation of Islam? (By the way, the longest radical racism of contempt, paranoia, and hostility is probably certain strains of Judaism and Jewish World View.)
Anyway, I will use the term 'race-ism' to mean belief in the reality of race & racial differences and/or the need for racial consciousness. And by 'race', I also mean sub-race or ethnicity. There is the broad white race of Europeans and then ethnic groups or sub-races such as the Germanics, Slavs, Anglos, Celts, Italians, Greeks, and etc. Now, what do I mean by no race or nation surviving for long without race-ism? I obviously don't mean the people of a nation must act like Nazis and 'invade Poland' and commit mass-killings of the Other. Instead, a people must know that they are unique and particular by blood & genetic inheritance and/or culture & history. Even if whites and blacks were to be raised and instilled with same language and ideology, they would still be different races with unique features, temperaments, and styles. They might learn from each other and borrow ideas from one another, but if either group is to survive as a unique people, it must maintain a general separateness, sovereignty, and autonomy over its own territory and affairs.
Next, even if two peoples are genetically nearly identical, they could have different histories, cultures, customs, and legends that distinguish one from the other. There isn't much genetic distance between Anglos and the Irish, but they have different histories and cultural consciousness. Same is true of Southern Chinese and Vietnamese. Many Greeks and Turks are similar in genetics and blood, but they are culturally and historically separate groups. Same goes for Germans and Swedes, even more so between Norwegians and Swedes. Just because Finns and Russians are both white Europeans doesn't mean that they don't have rich and varied differences in language, culture, and historical narratives. And those differences are what makes the world fascinating. For the world to be colorful and diverse, there must remain distinct nations of peoples and cultures who maintain borders, identities, and territorial integrity.
And that's why no nation, people, or culture will survive without race-ism and culturism: A belief in their racial and/or cultural uniqueness and the conviction to preserve such distinctions. It is by race-ism and culturism that people get to LAY CLAIM to their bios, ethnos, mythos, cultos, and terros. Without such claim, your people own nothing; they have nothing to call their own; everything about them, their lands, their wealth, their culture, their history, and etc. are all toss-up objects for sale at the global flea-market and meat-market. The entirety of your people, culture, land, and history has been turned into mix-and-match items in a Jewish pawnshop. They may continue to exist physically but no longer as the property of your people. Everything about your people now exists to be raided, auctioned off, looted, and passed around the world. Just like cattle exist but don't own their own bodies and therefore are slaughtered, chopped, and sold around the world, your people-culture-and-land will be turned into meat-and-dairy products under globalist hegemony. Cows can't say NO to being slaughtered, butchered, and sold because they don't own their own bodies. They belong to humans-as-either-sellers-or-buyers. They are mere economic units to be bought and sold on the global marketplace. Beef from Argentina may be sold to Mexico, the US, India, China, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and etc. Cows are organisms like we are, but they have no racial consciousness, no culture, no history, and no means to lay claim to anything. They are clueless creatures that eat when fed and don't know they are to be killed, cut up, and cooked for humanity. They cannot connect the dots. If they had human intelligence and means of speech, they would be able to assert themselves.
But then, maybe not. After all, so much of humanity are being turned into faceless & mindless consumers and even commodities(especially as sex objects to be marketed by Jewish shysters) and their identities, cultures, and territories are being robbed from them right under their feet, but they are either unaware of what is happening or deliriously supportive of this process of dehumanization, de-nationalization, and de-culturalization. And even though Jews do the very opposite for themselves while pushing commoditization on the goyim, so many goyim praise and honor Jews as their masters — it's like how the animals on the farm all praise the vile and vicious Pig Elites in George Orwell's ANIMAL FARM where the promise of equality caves to the ruthless logic of IQ hierarchy, art of cunning, and Will to Power. It goes to show that human intelligence and consciousness are malleable. Rationally or irrationally, mini-minds and weak wills are warped and manipulated by big minds and strong wills. While all people think and feel, most people 'think' and 'feel' as the elites direct them to. And the big-minded and strong-willed elites of the current West are heinous and hideous Jews.
Possibly, the most effective means by which Jews robbed white goyim of their claims to blood, soil, culture, history, and morality is by using the Jew-run media, academia, and deep state to spread the notion that there is no greater 'sin' than 'racism'. Paradoxically, Jews suppressed white race-ism in order to bolster their own racial supremacism. Jews attack even the slightest show of white identity and interests as 'white supremacist' while compelling whites to mindlessly support what is clearly Jewish racial supremacism as it's quite obvious that Jews aren't content with Jewish national sovereignty in Israel or expression of Jewish interests(among other interests, some of them counter to Jewish interests) in the US. Instead, Jews insist on Zionist imperialist tyranny over Palestinians and use their control of the US to destroy perceived enemies and rivals in the Middle East by sanctions, invasions, and support for terrorism. In the US, Jews will not tolerate Palestinian-American support for BDS or a foreign policy that balances Zionist lobbying with counter interests of Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, and others. Instead, all of US must be for Jews Uber Alles, Israel First, and Zionic hegemonism over the Middle East and North Africa. And of course, Jews have done everything to destroy or desecrate Christianity with globo-homo Queertianity. Despite Zionists having turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah with massive homo 'pride' parades, the christ-cucks in US churches praise Jews and Israel in the most embarrassing way. As for principled Christians like Rick Wiles who refuse to kneel before Satanic globo-homo Zion, they are censored, banned, and denied service by Jew-monopolies like Youtube and Paypal.
Incredibly, Jews have gotten away with forcing all of us to support their supremacism, imperialism, and hatred by pushing the pretense that they're combating 'white supremacism' and 'antisemitism'. According to Jews, even the slightest sign of white consciousness is 'white supremacist'. Even "It's Okay to be White" must be shut down and investigated by the FBI. And if you call out on Jewish imperialism and Zionist tyranny, you are smeared and destroyed as an 'Anti-Semite'. They are truly a vile and vicious people, the biggest hypocrites and arrogant scoundrels in the world. As far as Jews are concerned, White History has been nothing but one of 'white privilege', 'white racism', 'white supremacism', and etc. And because White History is so tainted with evil and guilt, Jews insist that even a smidgen of white consciousness, let alone pride, is reason for alarm. In other words, whiteness = disease = evil. Whiteness is so toxic and noxious(and apparently infectious to other whites) that it must remain fumigated and quarantined at all times. Even if just a tiny bit is allowed to escape and assert its worth and autonomy, it might spread like a virus and threaten the Jew World Order as all those 'infected' whites will want to burst out of the Jewish-made PC bubble. Whites must be made at all times to believe that they are ACCURSED with whiteness. They were born with a sickness and, as patients infected with evil, they must listen to Jewish social science doctors who tell them that they must show no pride or unity in their whiteness. If anything, whites must welcome mass-immigration-invasion, the Great Replacement or White Nakba, and massive race-mixing. Whites must all be turned into brown people like those of Latin America or North Africa. Having mixed blood, there shall no longer be proud white consciousness that may stand up to Jewish perfidy. And Jews figure that even if anti-Jewish sentiments may linger among browned folks, they will be too confused in identity to ever unite against Jewish Power. After all, the mixed-race populations of Latin America have been extremely ineffective in overthrowing the white Latin elites who've ruled South America since the days of the Conquistadors.
Whites no longer own their own history. White history has been doctored by Jews who associate whiteness with evil and guilt. Of course, if one does the same with Jewish History, Jews cry 'anti-Semite'. Jews have an effective moral and polemical shield against those who rummage through Jewish History for various evils, but whites have no comparable defense mechanism(and they need to develop it against Jews). Also, Jews covered up the fact that some of the darkest 'evils' of white history have been inseparable from Jewish History. Much of the slave trade that sold Slavic whites to North Africa and Near East were done by Jews. Jewish bankers financed much of Western Imperialism. Jews took part in the Atlantic Slave trade, especially in Brazil that brought over the greatest numbers of slaves. Jews of the British Empire sold opium to the Chinese. Jewish merchants worked with whites who wiped out the American Indians. Jews dominated much of organized crime in Europe and America. And Jewish communists played a key role in the Russian Revolution that ended up destroying millions of lives. So, the evils of genocide, imperialism, brutality, and slave-trade done by whites were also done by Jews who acted as merchants or financiers. But clever, cunning, and nasty Jews make us focus ONLY on the WHITE aspect of those evils. Also, Jews spread the notion among non-whites that WHITES AND ONLY WHITES were guilty of all the wrongs done to them. Indeed, Jews even pretend to be allies and fellow-victims of the so-called People of Color by selectively pointing to events where Jews were attacked by whites while failing to mention that, more often than not, Jews in Europe worked with the European Imperialist elites in the conquest and exploitation of the world. Imagine if the French selectively pointed to periods when they were attacked by the British and claimed to be fellow victims of the British Empire while totally ignoring the historical fact that the British and the French competed and cooperated side by side in their conquest of the non-white world. Jews are fiendishly sneaky that way.
One thing for sure, the Zionist project came to fruition with backing not only from British, Soviet, and American imperialists but even from Nazi imperialists. But then, Jews do a number on naive and stupid non-whites as well. By creating the impression that nationalism in white nations is 'racist' and 'xenophobic', Jews persuade non-whites into thinking that Nationalism = White Supremacism, and therefore, all goyim must reject this Nazi-like nationalism and embrace globalism. But in truth, whites didn't conquer the world through nationalism but through imperialism, and if non-whites eventually regained autonomy and sovereignty, it was through native nationalism and national liberation from Western Imperialism that had been thrust upon the world not only with white arms but with Jewish money. Jews sure are cunning and crafty. By conflating Nationalism with White Supremacism, Jews seek to kill two birds with one stone. They mean to destroy nationalism not only in white nations but in non-white ones. Of course, there are people who know this is BS, but as those in elite circles are mostly fixated on status and as the Jew-run US rules the world, they dare not stick out their necks and speak the truth; instead, they just hunker down and go along with the globalist project on the basis of "I got mine."
Without race-ism, there is no racial consciousness. The only kind of racial consciousness that Jews allow for whites is negative-consciousness or anti-consciousness, i.e. whites are to denounce consciousness of white identity, white history, white culture, and white territoriality as either evil, ill-gotten, or misconceived. Whites must not feel pride and a sense of ownership to what they are, where they live, what they've done, and what they believe. The great achievements of whites must be attributed to ALL of humanity. White history must retroactively be made 'multi-racial' and 'multi-cultural' so that ANY people can lay claim to it. The media put on historical programs where Past Europe has lots of blacks and other non-whites. Even the great white leaders and heroes must be made black or non-white. Jews say there was no WHITE History. Europe was never white but always 'multi-cultural' because NOT EVERYONE in Europe was white. (Using this logic, Japan and China weren't yellow because whites like Marco Polo and other came to visit.) Apparently, the Middle Ages weren't white and European because there were some Arabs and blacks in Europe at the time; therefore, Middle Ages were just as Arab and black. Of course, this isn't really about blacks or Arabs but about Jews. Jews hate the idea of white consciousness that thinks in terms of "we white Christians" and "those Semitic Jews". Such might lead to white consciousness that seeks White Liberation from Current Jewish Supremacism. So, Jews not only push a Diverse Future on the White West but try to fool whites that this Diverse Future isn't a break with the White Past but a merely natural continuance because the White World was always Diverse and into Multi-Culturalism. (Never mind that most of these white relations with non-whites were violent and bloody: Moorish invasions, Mongol invasions, and European Crusades and incursions into non-white territories. If anyone wants to celebrate Ottoman Occupation of Greece and Moorish conquest of Spain as wonders of Diversity, he or she is a mental slave of Jews. I suppose Jews should celebrate Roman tyranny over Judea.)
There are two kinds of histories. Factual history, which should be left up to professional historians who pore over records, documents, data. But for most people, the kind of history that matters isn't factual but mytho-narrative. While this kind of history should stick close to facts and truth as much as possible, its real objective is to fashion a story of a people and imbue it with meaning, significance, and purpose. It's like a biography isn't merely a collection of data on someone. It is a lively tale and summation of his life and what it has come to mean. Thus, certain facts must be selected over others. Certain details are emphasized over others. Necessarily, if you want to portray a man as a villain, you will focus the bad sides of his character and deeds to drive the point home. On the other hand, if you want to portray a man as a hero, you will focus on facts and details that would support such an image. Of course, no man is all villain and all hero. Everyone is a mix of both, and all biographies and all histories should dwell on both the light and the darkness of any person or people. Still, the main purpose of mytho-narrative is to defend, glorify, and romanticize the story of your people. Take the Old Testament. While there are passages that show Jews to have been unworthy of God's love and blessing, it is ultimately a narrative that justifies the story of Jews as a special people with a sacred contract or Covenant with God. This is why it is necessary that mytho-narrative history must be owned and controlled by your own people and its champions. Such historians are essentially word-warriors. They master the power of words and knowledge to fashion a narrative that honors, defends, and justifies your people. While it's possible that a foreigner may be sympathetic to your people while one of your own may be hostile to his own kind, there is a greater likelihood that the history of your people will be sullied, befouled, and condemned in the hands of the Other.
Tragically, white folks outsourced their mytho-narrative to the Jews who selectively spun a tale that made whites out to be the Devil, Cancer, and Virus of human history. Would Jews be so stupid as to out-source their mytho-history to Palestinians, Iranians, or those deemed 'anti-Semitic'? While those hostile to Jews may tell a compelling and convincing story of Jewish Perfidy and Evils through human history, Jews themselves would be stupid not to own their own history and narrative. While it would be good for Jews(and any people) to face up to the dark chapters in their own history, ultimately their narrative must be more of light than darkness. Otherwise, the people will end up like whites under Jews who turned White History into one of exceptional evil that can be redeemed ONLY BY cucking to Jews, ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) , and White Nakba(aka the Great Replacement).
Now, consider race-ism and the ownership of homeland. Any territory without the stamp of race-ist claim will be lost no matter how rich and powerful a people may be. American Indians lost their lands to whites because they were outnumbered, out-gunned, and out-fought. In contrast, whites are losing their lands in US, Canada, Australia, and Europe not because they are weak and poor but because they've lost race-ist claims on their nations. Despite dire demographic trends, the White West is still the most powerful bloc in the world. Then, why is it so helpless against preventing White Nakba or the Great Replacement brought about by Mass Immigration Invasion? It is because whites have rejected race-ist claim to history and territory. The claim of history and claim of territory are interrelated because, after all, territorial claim is justified by historical narrative. "We Hungarians own Hungary because it's the land bequeathed to us by our ancestors." "We Jews founded the Jewish State in Palestine because it was our land in ancient times." "We whites deserve to own and rule the US, Canada, and Australia because, even though we took it from other peoples, we founded and built great new nations in ways that ONLY WE could have." Such race-ist historical claims serve as basis for race-ist territorial claims. These claims say THIS is OURS, and NOT yours: Either the land belonged to our people from time immemorial OR our people built new nations out of the wilderness. But once a people reject race-ism, they lose racial consciousness. Their sense of story and territory becomes merely individualistic. 'My Story' and 'My Property' but no sense of 'Our Story' and 'Our Property'. Once whites rejected race-ism, they rejected the very concept of white people with white history on white territory. So, while whites-as-individuals have personal stories and private properties, they have no sense of collective narrative(except one that emphasizes 'white guilt') and collective ownership of territory or national property. While individualism is useful and productive, the question is what must it ultimately serve? As no individual lives forever or is a god, it makes no sense to put oneself at the center of existence and meaning. Every individual must realize he is part of a link, an inheritor, and that after he dies, what he'd been a part of shall be bequeathed to others whose obligation is to keep alight the torch of identity, history, and territory. The problem with libertarian individualism is it has no sense of life beyond 'me, me, me'. Furthermore, the fact that so many libertarians nevertheless suck up to Jews, blacks, and homos indicates that even for hardcore libertarians, liberty and individuality aren't enough. Even as they denigrate and negate white identity in the name of individuality, they feel this craving to serve something-bigger-than-themselves, and it's usually 'muh Israel', 'muh Magic Negro', or 'muh holy homo'.
Anyway, despite the greatness of white power and wealth in objective terms, the White West began its slide into oblivion because it subjectively abandoned race-ism, the consciousness that had once united whites in white nations into proud peoples with a powerful claims over the lands on which they lived and their ancestors fought for and died. Without race-ist consciousness, they could no longer felt united as members of a white race in a white nation. Without racial solidarity, they lost their sense of racial history and racial territory. If they no longer cared for white identity, it meant they no longer made white claims over white territory. Indeed, the new dogma was that whiteness is just a social construct or, worse, a disease/cancer, and therefore, the greatest evil is for whites to identify proudly as white or European. Lacking such consciousness, how could white people say WE WHITE PEOPLE OWN THIS WHITE LAND? How could a particular land belong to whites when whites no longer have white identity? Without white identity, there is no claim of white territory.
Thus, it doesn't matter how many white people there are in a certain nation; it doesn't matter how much wealth they own or how much power they have in objective terms of guns, tanks, and bombers. As long as they have no race-ist or racial consciousness, they no longer believe that their territory belongs to them as a race and people. So, even as tons of non-whites pour in as immigrants, whites cannot say NO since their anti-race-ism tells them that it's wrong for whites to think, feel, and react collectively(except in denouncing white unity). Indeed, white nations have been rendered defenseless even against rag-tag illegal migrants because, as whites no longer believe in white identity and territory, who are whites to tell non-whites, legal or illegal, that they don't belong in white nations that are no longer deemed WHITE nations? And so, we see the sorry sight all over Europe. Europe is so much richer and stronger than African and Muslim nations, but they are also helpless to stop the invasion.
Worse, while white identity is taboo, white anti-identity is all the rage among the neo-puritanical progs whose minds have been infected by Jewish Propaganda. So, not only are whites defenseless against the invasion but they are hastening the invasion and Great Replacement with enthused aid to non-white marauder-migrants. Some do it in the name of humanitarianism, but if they truly care about justice, why don't they call out on the factors that have turned so many people in the Middle East into refugees in the first place? Why don't they condemn Jewish Supremacism and Wars for Israel? But then, how could they since, even as they reject white identity, they've embraced Jews-as-Deity, and that means Jews cannot be condemned for their foulness. Why, it'd be 'antisemitic'. So, even as Jews mess up the Middle East, whites cannot condemn the Jews but must suffer the cost of the mess created by Jews. Imagine if I burn down someone's house and force you to take in the family that is now without a home. Naturally, you should be condemning me for burning down the house, but you dare NOT do that as you've come to see me as your master and god; so you feel YOU must bear the burden of what I have done.
It doesn't matter how powerful you are objectively if you're weak and cucked subjectively. Suppose you live in a home with lots of guns and bullets. You have strong walls and lots of food and supplies. Objectively, you are well-protected and secure indeed. But suppose you subjectively believe that you have no special claim to the house. As such, when trespassers arrive and ask to be let in, you just let them in. You have the guns but dare not use them against the invaders because you don't believe the house belongs especially to you and your family. Same logic applies to nations. If you lose race-ist consciousness, you've lost the race-ist claim on your land. Then, it is open to invasion from all the world... which is what is happening to the West. Next time Jews tell you to lose your race-ist claim on your land, you ask them why they maintain a powerful race-ist claim on Israel? The damned buggers.
One of the most important assets a race or people have is possession of the women. A people are effectively finished when the women of the race lose respect for the men. Such women are likely to forgo wifehood and motherhood, thereby failing to produce the next generation. Or worse, they might go with the men of another race, even the invasive and colonizing race because it is the nature of women to go with winner-conquerors(even of enemy races). Always, the conquering race takes the women of the vanquished race. When People A conquer People B, the men of People A don't go to the men of People B and say, "Hey, come and hump our mothers, wives, daughters, and etc." No, it's the winning side that conquers and colonizes the wombs of the losing side. When Turks ruled over Greece, they took Greek women. When Mongols invaded China, Iran, and Russia, they took the women of the conquered. When whites were masters over blacks as slaves, white men humped black women. When Zionists took nearly all of Palestine and carried out Nakba, they raped Arab women as sexual trophies. When Soviet Troops entered Germany, they raped countless German women. When US defeated Japan, they used Japanese women as whores. When the Spanish Conquistadors took over South America and Mexico, they took native brown women.
Now, not all conquering folks were enthusiastic about race-mixing. The British Empire was far less into race-mixing than the French Empire and Spanish Empire were. National Socialists discouraged race-mixing whereas Soviet Empire encouraged it. At any rate, the fate of the brown natives of what is called 'Latin America' goes to show what happens when men lose possession and the respect of their own women. Brown men were defeated by white Spaniards who took brown women to produce a neo-race of 'mestizos' who became confused in identity and, to this day, have no real sense of what they are. While race-mixing of any kind always weakens and dilutes the identity of the conquerors as well as of the conquered, it is always far more damaging psychologically and culturally to the conquered side. It was painful for Russian men to see their daughters taken by Mongol barbarians. It was painful for Vietnamese men to see their women turned into a bunch of whores by US military. It was shameful for black men to see their women be taken by 'honkey-ass mothafuc*as' in the Old South. Consider the trauma of French men who were helpless to stop French women from running into the arms of German occupiers. (Granted, some of these French women weren't necessarily treasonous in spirit. They might have regarded pre-Occupation France as a Jewish-dominated tyranny and therefore welcomed German victory as liberation of France from the Juif.) Without women, there is no future for the race. And while men can produce kids with women of any race, if they want to perpetuate the aesthetics, soul, and temperament of their own Volk, they should have children with women of the same race. Spanish men had children with native brown women, and the results were rather Guillermo-ish(of the dreadful Jimmy Kimmel Show). Guillermo may be a nice guy and all, but he doesn't look quite like a Spaniard. Nor does he look like a proud Mayan warrior. He looks like a human burrito.
In our time, the biggest threat to white ownership of white women and white beauty comes from 'anti-racism' and Jungle Fever, a kind of double whammy. Political Correctness is the colonization of white minds by Jewish propaganda, and what might be called Biological Correctness is the colonization of white wombs by black seed. In a way, both PC and Jungle Fever are 'natural' insofar as smaller minds cuck to bigger minds and wussier men cuck to tougher men. When whites began to practice inter-meritocracy, they were bound to lose out to the 'best man'. White Power could only be sustained with intra-meritocracy that rewarded the best among the whites AGAINST non-whites. But once whites adopted universal inter-meritocracy, white minds lost out to Jewish minds that are higher in IQ and stronger in will. And white muscles lost out to tougher black muscles, and white dongs lost out to bigger black dongs. Now, why did whites forsake intra-meritocracy that had served and sustained White Power so well and instead go with inter-meritocracy, a universal call for 'may the best man of any race win'? Part of the reason was the rise of rationalism and its concept of universal justice. Another reason was rooted in Christian ethos. Also, the radical racists such as the National Socialists gave racial consciousness a bad name. Ironically though, even as Jews reviled racial consciousness among whites on grounds of Nazi Evil in World War II, they revamped their own racial consciousness in pushing through the Zionist project and in making whites submit to Jewish Supremacist Power. (Also, let's remember that the Pacific War was pushed by both Conservatives and Liberals alike as a race war against the yellow 'Japs', and Jews did their part in dehumanizing the Japanese like the National Socialists had dehumanized the Jews.)
In any case, when white people gave up on racial consciousness, each and every white person was encouraged to be a mere individualist, consumer, hedonist, celebrity-obsessed idol worshiper, and etc. White women felt 'liberated' and no longer 'owned' by white men, the evil patriarchs. But most of them being stupid or dumb, they just came to be mentally owned by Jews and sexually owned by blacks. They went from women of a race, history, and heritage to mere commodities of Jews and playthings of blacks. And white men, instead of waking up and fighting the Jews and blacks, were too brainwashed themselves with 'white guilt' and too gushy with 'white fever'(for black thrills in sports and rap) to unite and fight to defend race, homeland, heritage, and honor. And at this point in history, it all looks hopeless. The great lesson, at any rate, is that a people will lose their identity, history, homeland, and women when they abandon race-ism. While sane people need to forsake extreme race-ism(like religious people should reject theocratic fanaticism), they need to realize that there is nothing more precious and valuable than race-ism in the preservation of a people and culture on their sacred land. If whites want to reclaim their land and culture for their posterity, they must say NO to Jewish Supremacism and regain white race-ist consciousness.
Invoking John Mearsheimer’s THE GREAT DELUSION(that argues that humans are naturally tribal and, therefore, nationalism will overcome liberalism in any real conflict), Luke Ford reiterates a common theme of his. He agrees that humans are naturally tribal, and all groups think of themselves as ‘special’ or ‘superior’(at least in some ways). Before we address the main topic of JQ, are Mearsheimer and Ford correct about the indomitable power of tribalism? If tribalism is so strong and resilient, why did most cultures fade from history, essentially merging or surrendering to other cultures? Among all the cultures of the Ancient World, how many survived? Isn't Jewishness just about the only one?
Now, while tribalism is natural to all groups, the us-versus-them mechanism may not always play along tribal or national lines. Despite tribal feelings, other considerations may take precedence. For example, all people naturally want fun in their lives but may well delay gratification because they are also naturally rational & calculating and may choose to work for long-term interest than for fun-fun-fun in the moment. There are competing natures, and everyone undergoes inner-conflict because one part of his nature tells him to do ‘this’ while another part of ‘nature’ tells him to do that. It’s like humans are both naturally ‘capitalist’ and ‘socialist’. There is a part of us that wants gain for self-interest but also a part of us that wants to be belong to a community and share. Despite their ideological polarities, libertarianism and communism have one thing in common in assuming that human nature must be either totally individualist or totally socialist.
In the case of tribalism, yes, it is natural, but is it the most powerful force in the world? Or, will people readily betray tribalism for individual gain, material advantage, hedonism & excitement, worship of power, and/or self-righteous vanity? Consider the areas of sex. If tribalism is so powerful, why do so many black men go with white women over black women? Isn’t it because they find white women to be more attractive and thus more pleasurable? Likewise, isn’t jungle fever about white female desire for the Negro with bigger dong, more muscle, and stronger voice? Why have so many white people rejected their own musical heritage for rap, reggae, soul, and other black or black-inflected music? Isn’t it because they find more thrill and excitement in black stuff? Why do many Asian-American women go with white men than yellow men? Isn’t it because they find more pleasure in being with white men who are deemed more attractive? And if Asian-American men had higher market value, might not they also favor white women over yellow ones given the global tendency to idolize white beauty standards? And consider immigration. Isn’t it a form of betrayal? When people emigrate to another nation, especially for permanent resettlement, they are shifting not only their bodies but their loyalties to a new political, economic, cultural, and demographic entity. So many parents all over the world are willing to move to the US, Canada, and Australia, raise their kids with English(than their native tongues), and pledge loyalty to the Anglo-Zionist Empire. Why would this be IF tribalism is the most powerful force on the planet? Look at Japanese-Americans in the US. They are completely deracinated and racially mixed. Around the world, it’s not uncommon for the majority in certain nations to say that, given the choice, they would love to permanently move to another nation... which are usually the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and European nations. So, even if they do have a tribal bone in their body, their desire for more money, access to white people(as better managers or sex-mates), hunger for more land & property, and fascination with power(as US and the West still dominate the world) trump their sense of racial-national loyalty. Look how fast Syria and other Muslim nations emptied when Angela Merkel said EU would welcome them with open arms. All those millions ran to the West for ‘more stuff’ while forgetting all about their own people and culture. Tribalism may be natural and offer a kind of security of identity and territory, but it’s not very fun nor materially rewarding in and of itself. You can be the most patriotic person in your nation, but that sentiment alone won't earn you a dime. After all, at most times, we are looking for food, fun, and ‘more stuff’. We are not thinking about "what am I?", "who are my people?", or "what is my heritage"? We want the next good meal, the next fun movie, the next ‘cool’ thing to do. Tribalism has long-term value but offers little of use, utilitarian or hedonistic, in the moment. Tribalism is very effective as a collective force — Jews working together for Zionism or Turks uniting for Turkish pride — but means little to the individual caught up in his daily life of work/struggle(mainly for material gain) and fun/leisure(for relief from weariness of life). Also, tribalism may be weaker, at least when food is plenty, than the feeling that comes from feeling righteous. (Tribalism is most potent when people don't have much to share in terms of food, land, and resources with the Other. It is then that they instinctively come together as a community to defend 'what is ours' against THEM.)
Now, in the LONG RUN, tribalism may be more resilient than righteousness(of ideology, hysteria, or fashion) because tribalism is merely about BEING whereas righteousness is about BEING-RIGHT. Because righteousness is a stronger and more aggressive emotion than tribalism(that tends to be wary and defensive), it can override tribalism in the short-term of history, but precisely because hot passions tend to burn out, tribalism often makes a comeback after the ideological fire has gone out. (The Ideal regresses to the Real. But then, the Regression to the Real doesn't necessarily mean upsurge of tribalism that, like Idealism, requires some degree of investment toward unity and commitment. Above all, the Real favors material interest for the individual, which is why 'liberal democratic capitalism' has caught on like fire as the most effective means to either enrich oneself or to gain proximity to those with wealth.) This was the case with the so-called Russian Revolution(that just as easily could have been called the Anti-Russian Revolution). Many of the revolutionaries were not only non-Russian but anti-Russian(especially true among Jews, Latvians, Poles, and etc.) and regarded the radical transformation as a means to destroy and curb Russian Imperial power, from whose ashes a new order would arise based on impassioned commitment to ‘social justice’. Also, great many Russians joined the revolution because they figured the Bolshevik promises of Land, Bread, and Peace were more important than nationalism and loyalty to the Tsar(and then to the patriotic Provisional Government). Also, many were spellbound by communist propaganda. Thus, material interests and righteous fervor overrode tribalism and nationalism. But in the end, the revolutionary fire burned out, and while there is no more communism, Russia still remains. One may say Russian Tribalism won out in the long run, but consider the costs in the radical interim: Millions(if not tens of millions) of destroyed lives, rise of police state, mass terror on an unprecedented scale, the brainwashing of generations of youths, ideological dogmatism, and one-party totalitarianism. It’s like, even if the forest will naturally regrow again, we cannot underestimate the destruction brought upon by forest fires. The Maoist ideological madness eventually subsided and blew over in China, but consider all the damage it did to the people, economy, and culture in its rampage phase.
It may well be that the current White PC-SJW madness will blow over, but it's been doing considerable harm for nearly two decades. Worse, the harm may be permanent because of massive demographic changes. If the demography remains constant, no amount of lunacy can permanently forestall the return of tribalism or nationalism. Maoism killed a lot of Chinese, but China remained the land of the Chinese, and a kind of nationalism resurfaced. Likewise, despite the tremendous human costs of Stalinism, not to mention all the deaths from the Nazi-German invasion of World War II, the fact is Russia-Proper of the Soviet Empire remained majority-Russian, thus facilitating the re-emergence of Russian nationalism after the fall of communism and the lost years of Boris Yeltsin when Jewish globalist oligarchs ran just about everything.
In contrast, something is happening in the West along with the crazy ideological fashions that may PERMANENTLY cripple and destroy traditional American nationalism based on European Heritage. Or consider Canada. If it remains mostly a white nation as it passes through ridiculous ideological fashions(such as globo-homo madness), one can be pretty sure that there will be a return of the national-conservative equilibrium. But Canada is reveling in ideological idiocy at a time of massive demographic change. Indeed, the main goal of that ideological idiocy is to fundamentally alter the racial demographics of Canada. That being so, if and when white Canadians FINALLY realize their ideology was stupid, the damage they’ve done will be irreversible. Demographic Imperialism is different from communism. As problematic as communism has been, it did not aim to demographically change the Core Population. Whatever gripes Poles may have had against communism, it kept Poland Polish. So when communism was finally swept into the dustbin of history, Poland remained Poland. In contrast, the new mad ideology of the West, that of Diversity-Worship and Immigration-Invasion, won't merely fill up minds with stupid ideas or turn back the economy. Its aim is to permanently replace the core populations of white nations(of Europe) or white-founded-and-made nations(of the Americas and Australia) with masses of non-white globalist leeches and parasites. And for this reason, Diversinoma(Diversity as Cancer) is many times more dangerous than communism. As Diversinoma is pushed most heavily by Jewish globalist-Zionist capitalists, we need to consider the true character of Jewishness, Zionism, globalism, and capitalism.
One thing for sure, it seems the reason why so many white people have chosen to turn against their own kind is due to (1) feely-good righteous passion (2) addiction to pleasure. As they were raised by PC in schools and via Jewish-controlled TV & Mass-Media, so many white people(and this includes majority of ‘conservatives’ as well) have been made to idolize the Magic Negro, place Shoah at the center of history, bellyache over ‘white guilt’(as the highest redemptive expression open to whites), and chant mantras about Diversity(when they are not bending over backward[and forward] to Globo-Homo). But other than virtue-high that comes with self-righteous PC, there is the white addiction to black music, black-dominated sports, and black sex(either as jungle fever among white women or cuck-behavior among white men) that have turned so many whites into sensual-slaves to the ‘cool’ and ‘badass’ Masterful Negro. Considering that even many white ‘conservatives’ go out of their way to show that they really really love blacks and that ‘Democrats are the real racists(and Anti-Semites)’, it goes to prove that tribalism can be overridden by other passions that are more in-and-of-the-moment. Most people are more about Will-to-Cower than Will-to-Power. They gladly fall into awed rapture of what is deemed Most Powerful. Just like so many people are willing to ditch their own nations, peoples, and cultures and come to the US and be part of the Lone Superpower, so many whites are eager to worship the Negro as the superior race of sports, music, and sex(and of course, the reason why homos have become such an object of fashion-passion is because they are associated with creativity, privilege, and power; it's all about hierarchy, not equality).
Anyway, returning to the main issue at hand, it appears Luke Ford is consciously or subconsciously not facing up to the truth about Jewish Identity and Tribalism. JQ or Jewish Question is NOT upset over the fact that Jews care about their own kind, their own history, culture, identity, and etc. If anything, non-Jews have long admired(and even envied) Jews for their longevity and tenacity to survive against all odds. The Real Problem is that of POWER, INTENSITY, and HYPOCRISY, especially in the context of America, the sole superpower that more-or-less dominates the world.
First, let's consider the issue of Power. While it may be true that various groups in America care about their own kind, obviously the level of power will determine the implications and consequences of such ethno-centrism. For example, let’s suppose Fat Hawaiians and Jews are equally ethno-centric. The thing is Fat Hawaiians have NO power, whereas Jews have tremendous power, especially with their near-monopolistic control over media, academia, finance, and etc. This monopoly control can be direct or indirect. Not only do Jews own many top law firms, high-tech firms, Wall Street firms, and the like but they use organizations like ADL, SPLC, and AIPAC to pressure even non-Jewish owned firms to comply with Jewish supremacist demands. Amazon.com isn’t Jewish-owned but chose to bow under pressure from the Jewish Lobby. Because Jews elevated Shoah or Holocaust to the status of New Religion, they have god-like powers to issue decrees that must be obeyed by rich and powerful non-Jews... lest they be accused of ‘antisemitism’ associated with, of course, Nazism. And so, Amazon no longer sells THE CULTURE OF CRITIQUE by Kevin MacDonald even though it is a very important book. Also, as Jews have come to dominate elite schools and control mass media, many goyim have been effectively brainwashed since grammar school to toe the Jewish line on just about anything; they’ve been led to believe that anything disapproved by Jews must be ‘hateful’. If Jewish power were limited to a small or weak nation, it wouldn’t matter. It'd be a Jewish thing among Jewish people. But as Jewish Power is the most powerful power in the US as the most powerful country on Earth, it makes little sense to say that Jews are no different in their ethnocentrism from other groups. After all, Eskimos can decide to be 100x more ethnocentric than the Jews, but it won’t make any difference to the rest of us because they have NO power in any of the institutions and industries that profoundly impact our lives. It’s like, even if every boy were a natural bully, the big kid’s bullying nature will matter helluva lot more than the small kid’s. While both big bully and little bully may want to bully, the big bully is going to get a lot more leverage out of bullying than the little weakling.
Secondly, there is the matter of INTENSITY, especially in the context of assimilationist America. Given that America’s emphasis, at least since the great era of Mass Immigration in the early 1920s, has been the Melting Pot, the fact is most Americans of all groups have grown markedly less ‘identitarian’ or tribal in their outlook. Most German-Americans don’t speak German and don’t care anything about Germany. They are just ‘Americans’. Same could be said for most Italian-Americans who hardly care about the mother country. Irish-Americans used to care about Old Ireland, but both Irish-Americans and Irish in Ireland have become a bunch of deracinated cucks and jungle-feverites(not least because they’ve come under the influence of Globo-Homo-Afro culture pushed by the Jewish media and globalist power). Asian-Americans assimilate rapidly into American culture. Japanese-Americans hardly exist as an identity or tribal group. Majority of Japanese-American women married white men, and Japanese-American men keep their heads low. The most famous Japanese-American thinker, Francis Fukuyama, is a tool of the Neocons and a fervent pusher of globalism, even going so far as to urge mass immigration-invasion on Japan.
Anglo-Americans, for the most part find, ‘racism’(especially among their own kind) to be the gravest of sins and spend more time pissing on the graves of their ancestors than sticking up for their own kind. Your average Anglo, even in the GOP, is more likely to be ‘triggered’ by "It’s Okay to be White" than express pride in identity and race.
Then, it’s simply not true that every group in America equally thinks itself ‘special’ or ‘superior’. By and large, most East Asians and groups from Latin America are without identity or pride. Japanese, Koreans, and Vietnamese in America are just becoming part of America, for good or ill. As for Latin Americans, there is a huge divergence between Latin whites and ‘Latin’ browns, though the line between white and brown is murky among those people. Also, there is hardly any commonality among Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, Cubans, Guatemalans, and etc. The ONLY issues that bind all ‘Latinos’ together is the desire for More Immigration(so that more of their kind can come to leech off gringo or yanqui, not least because their own nations are so corrupt and backward) AND acting all butt-hurt as the losers in the Anglo-Hispanic struggle for hegemony in the Americas. Anglos obviously won(before they lost to Jews as the New Elites of the World Empire) and have Pride of Victory, and so, ‘Latinos’ have clung to Nobility of Victim-hood as compensation and 'moral' weapon. (It’s also a handy way by which Latin Whites can divert the rage/resentment of browns[who are NOT ‘Latin’ in race or origin] toward ‘Yanquis’ or ‘Gringos’ away from themselves despite the fact that Latin America is the creation of ‘Latin’ Spanish and Portuguese Imperialists.) Even Muslim 'identity' is far from clear in the US as it is not race-based. A Muslim can be Arab, Asian, African, white, or whatever. So, despite occasional outbursts of radical Muslim violence, there is hardly a united Muslim community in the US. Pakistani Muslims have little in common with Muslims from Palestine or Somalia. Indeed, Palestinian Muslims are more likely to feel closer to Arab Christians, just like Pakistani Muslims are more likely to get along with Hindu Americans(despite the dire Indo-Pakistan tensions that exist to this day).
So, the intensity of Jewish identity and tribalism in the US is something of an exception than the rule. The ONLY groups with identities as powerful are the blacks and the Hindus, but blacks don’t control the elite institutions and industries(and if anything, must depend on Jewish money, which is why most black elites are shuffling ho-de-doing Cuckamungas of the Jews), and Hindus, despite their success and riches, are nowhere near Jews in power and influence. On Luke Ford’s very own show, the Jewish guests Kyle Rowland and Halsey English are very ethnocentric and identity-conscious, whereas ‘Monsieur’ the ‘Chinaman’ is a deracinated yellow dog who sucks up to whites and routinely badmouths his own kind. One may argue that ‘right-wing’ Jews are more tribal than ‘left-wing’ Jews, but in the world of power-politics and power-economics, we see no real difference between Jewish Democrats and Jewish Republicans on the issue of Jewish identity, Jewish power, Zionism, and Israel. How is Chuck Schumer any different from ‘right-wing’ Jews like Bret Stephens and William Kristol when it comes to Jewish pride and Zionism?
Thirdly and possibly most important is the matter of Jewish HYPOCRISY when it comes to identity and pride. Contrary to Ford’s contention that the ‘14/88' and Alt-Right communities simply cannot stand the sight of Jews caring for other Jews, the real problem is Jews cannot abide by goyim, especially whites and Palestinians, caring about their own kinds. If Jews were fair-minded about this and said, "Okay, we Jews will prioritize Jewishness while you various goyim prioritize your own ethnicity and heritage", there would be no need for JQ. That way, Jews could push for Jewish interests, Palestinian-Americans could push for their own interests, and white Americans could focus on issues and agendas that matter most to themselves. Then, the US would be a multi-identitarian nation, with each group pursuing its own particular interests. Of course, all groups would have to abide by certain shared standards and principles. For example, all groups should have equal protection under the law, same rights of free speech & free assembly, and same access to institutions of power on the basis of ability and meritocracy.
But, is this how Jews play the game? Jews have ADL to raise concerns about anti-Jewish expressions, but would Jews tolerate a white organization that focuses attention on all the anti-white filth that comes especially from blacks, Jews, and POC(brainwashed by Jewish media and academia)? How would Jews react to a white version of AIPAC that calls on US politicians to support white security, white pride, and white survival in Europe? Jews would scream ‘Nazi’. So, Jews organize to pressure and purchase US politicians to support the state of Israel and sing hosannas to Jews, Jews, Jews, but Jews will do everything to suppress even the slightest sign of white identity and consciousness, such as "It’s Okay to be White." Then, it should be obvious that Jews are not for multi-identitarianism or poly-identitarianism. They are for MONO-Identitarianism whereby Jews and ONLY Jews get to defend, promote, and celebrate their identity, culture, history, and future.
But it’s even worse than that. Even as Jews demand that white people suppress their own identity(or identities based on ethnic pride) on account that identity-politics is ‘racist’, they also demand that whites do everything in their means to praise Jewishness and support Israel, a nation defined by Zionism that has gone from nationalist to imperialist mode. And even as Jews insist that they, as proud Jews, have every right UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL LAW to push for Jewish and Zionist interests, they deny that very same right to Palestinian-Americans who aren't allowed to use the full force of BDS to organize a movement calling for a worldwide boycott against the Occupation of West Bank and massacres in Gaza by IDF death squads. So, according to the twisted logic of Jews, it is American-as-apple-pie for Jews to enjoy rights to defend and bolster their own ethnic-tribal interests, BUT the same rights must be denied to the Palestinian-American community. So, Jews in America(in coordination with World Jewry) can organize all they want and raise tons of funds to pressure American politicians to sanction and destroy the economies of nations(such as Iran, Syria, and Russia) hated by Jews and/or Israel, BUT Palestinians are blocked from voicing views and taking actions to raise awareness of the Zionist imperialist Occupation of West Bank, the last substantial remaining Palestinian territory.
What does Luke Ford have to say about this? It should be obvious to any fair-minded observer that the problem is not Jews having Jewish-consciousness or using Jewish power to serve Jewish goals; the REAL problem is Jews have immense power and use every trick in the book, legal and extra-legal, to ensure that their own tribal interest overrides all other tribal interests(indeed, even in the hearts and souls of goyim).
Furthermore, Jewish tribalism isn't merely national but imperialist and hegemonic. It's not just about Jews caring about Jewish matters but Jews using their wealth and influence to make non-Jews support Jewish causes and interests above those of their own and other goyim. For instance, I'm sure Greek-Americans have certain interests as they relate to their mother country. So, they get together, raise funds, and do whatever they can within their own community to serve their ethnic interests. It's a Greek-American and Greek thing that do not affect the rest of us. We don't see US politicians going before a Greek version of AIPAC and pledging total obedience to Greece or spouting specious sentiments like 'Greece is our closest ally'. The difference between Greek-Americans and Jewish-Americans is that Greeks keep their ethnic issues to themselves. It's Greek stuff for Greeks. In contrast, Jews not only serve their own interests but buy off, blackmail, or otherwise pressure goy politicians, clergy, and celebrities to support Israel uber alles and praise Juden uber alles. Jews don't just take care of their own Jewish business but make it the business of non-Jews who are routinely pressured(to the point of coercion by threats and blackmail) to suck up to Jews. Most groups think in terms of "You prioritize your people, and we'll prioritize our people", whereas Jews think in terms, "We'll prioritize our people, and YOU prioritize our people."
There have been several articles of how AIPAC works as essentially a strong-arm thug scheme of Jewish Power. It goes to politicians and makes an offer they can't refuse: Sign a unconditional pledge of support for Israel or else lose the next election where massive Jewish money will go to the opponent who will also get favored coverage from the mass media that are monopolized by uber-Zionist oligarchs.
So, let's cut out the bull. Luke Ford is a smart guy, and he knows what is going on. For him to say that the JQ(or Jewish Question) is about griping over Jews caring for their own kind is totally bogus. The real problem is Jews feel free to pursue their own interests but deny that right and opportunity to others, especially Palestinians whose BDS movement has been UNCONSTITUTIONALLY blocked by government, both federal, state, and municipal. And notice the near-total silence about this injustice from both 'liberals' and 'conservatives' alike. Also, Jews are now in supremacist mode and are no longer merely content with tribal security/survival. They crave hegemony over all the world, and Jews know they can create and maintain such a system ONLY IF whites shelve their own identity and interests in favor of serving Jews as the Master Race. Just like British Imperialism promoted British national identity & pride but suppressed such consciousness among their subject peoples, such as Asian-Indians, the current Jewish World Power does the same to goy subjects. British Imperialists understood that the rise of Asian-Indian nationalism would inspire Hindus to ask, "Why should we serve 'Queen and Country' when we, as Indians, should be focusing on our own identity, our history, our pride, and our land?" So, the British suppressed Indian nationalism that took decades to gain independence. Likewise, Jews know they don't have the numbers to rule the world on their own. They need the support, indeed obedience, of white goyim as horse-dog-cattle, and that is why Jews forbid whites from having white identity(that is defamed by the Jew-run media and deep state as 'white supremacism') because once whites think and act like Jews — putting their own racial, tribal, or ethnic interests first — , they will no longer prioritize "Is it good for Jews?" and may even regard Jewish tribal demands to be harmful and deleterious to the white race. Just like British Imperialists feared Indian National Liberation from the Empire, Jews fear White National Liberation from Jewish globo-homo Imperial hegemony. That is why Jews, who are the real supremacists in today's world, hypocritically defame others as 'supremacist'. As far as Jewish globo-homo imperialists are concerned, whites-going-their own-way(WGTOW) is threatening because, without white cuck managers, builders, and soldiers, the Jew World Order or the Empire of Judea will crumble. Indeed, could all those Wars for Israel in Iraq, Libya, and Syria have been possible IF whites thought of their own interests first? Would white Americans support the Jewish Cold War on Iran and Russia IF they really thought honestly about their own interests? Of course not. Jews have gotten their way because they suppressed white identity & consciousness and made white hearts & minds subservient to Jews as the god-race that knows best and must be obeyed at every turn.
Try watching the first 5 minutes of the video below:
TV News Reader:
"At an emotional Town Hall last night, South Bend Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg heard from angry constituents after a police-involved shooting left a black man dead last night."
Pete Buttegieg: "We have tried but not succeeded in increasing Diversity in the police department, and we need help."
Angry Black Man:
"You have racism inside your police department. How are we supposed to trust you."
Angry Black Woman:
"I’m raising a 7yr old grandson, and when he sees the police, he is afraid. That is not what’s supposed to happen."
TV News Reader:
"Racial tensions flared last week after a WHITE South Bend police officer shot and killed a BLACK man who was allegedly holding a knife. The officer was wearing a body camera, but it was not turned on."
Pete Buttegieg:
"If anyone who is on patrol is shown to be a racist or to do something racist, in a way that is substantiated, that is their last day on the street... Did you ask me ‘Do black lives matter?’ Of course, black lives matter." (Shaky emotion-laden voice)
Angry Black Woman and Pete Buttegieg:
"So, my question is, ‘are you really here cuz you care for the blacks, or are you here because you want to be the president?’... What WE gonna do? What YA gonna do. Don’t just talking. Be about it. Give us proof you can really do something about it." "I’ll work on that." "You running for president, and you want black people to vote for you. That’s not gonna happen."
The introductory segment of the video above is truly a wonder to behold. It’s a concentrated form of idiocy that should be rare but is all too common in the currently demented America where honesty, integrity, courage, and truth have been rendered taboo on matters where the Narrative and Iconography have been pre-written into holy writ, or Poli-Writ. Vague terms like 'Diversity', 'Inclusion', and 'Tolerance'(as defined and manipulated by Jewish Globo-Homo supremacists who see nothing wrong with the Zionist tyranny over Palestinians and the persecution of Christian bakers who refuse to bake 'gay wedding' cakes or those celebrating tranny penis-cutting) fill the air when what we really need is a social order where the paramount virtues are Honesty, Integrity, Truth, Courage, and Reality: HITCR.
As we all know, religions are both inspiring and infuriating because they don’t play by rules of facts and logic. While religious folks use reason to explain, justify, and/or reform their belief system, the ultimate source of their truth remains mysterious, a matter of blind conviction. At some point, faith is required in one’s devotion to the Power deemed to be great, wise, and eternal. Such convictions have elevated man’s imagination and given him hope & meaning. But religions have also led to willful blindness, pigheadedness, ignorance-as-pride, and holier-than-thou dogmatism. However, even in its negatives, the one saving grace of religion is that the holy and sacred are invested with God or gods, forces or beings deemed to be infinitely above the ways of man. Thus, in making the spiritual being the focus of faith and devotion, religions have had the way of suppressing the apotheosis of man or group of people as the beholders of ultimate truth, justice, and wisdom. In Judaism, a man can be a prophet, but even the greatest prophet is but a flea in the presence of God. Perhaps, Jews hated Christianity for elevating a Man to status of God, but Christians don’t believe Jesus was a Man who became God but was God who was born a Man. According to Muslims, Muhammad was the greatest and the final Prophet, but even the great one was a mere messenger of Allah, the one true God. Hinduism’s concept of holiness differs from the monotheistic Abrahamic Faiths in that gurus, via intense and prolonged meditation & virtuous life, can gain a kind of holiness. But because this path is open to any would-be-guru who seeks spiritual enlightenment, holiness cannot be hogged by one individual or a particular group. Even those who are born as Brahmins must undergo intensive training to be worthy of the caste; if they fail in their allotted roles, the souls within them could be demoted in the NEXT life. Also, in order for Brahmins to go beyond priestly duties and gain yogi status, they must make an even greater effort on the individual level to embark on the path of higher truth. It's not easy nor a given. Furthermore, the notion of reincarnation imbues the Hindu faithful with humility because, no matter how virtuous one’s soul may be in THIS LIFE, there is the chance that it will fall from grace in later manifestations... though there is always the hope that it may claw itself back to grace in further lives down the line. Furthermore, gaining holiness in Hinduism is a most arduous process requiring adherence to proper rituals, rejection of worldly pleasures, and intense commitment to meditation & self-purging. It has to be earned, like the tough climb to the top of the mountain.
The West is now in the post-religious era, but the result hasn’t been the triumph of reason, logic & facts, critical thinking, skepticism, and freedom of conscience. The problem is of modernity is that, even the fading of religious authority, the ‘spiritual’ nature of man remains, and this means a tireless & desperate search for ‘new gods’. Also, reason, logic, and facts are merely the tools of man. On their own, they have no will or agency. Will arises from ego, ambition, and lust for power. Men with stronger egos will gain over those with weaker egos, and groups that have more strong-willed individuals will gain dominance over groups with weaker-willed individuals. In many cases, a less-intelligent man of stronger ego gains advantage over more-intelligent man of weaker ego. The reason why the Jonathan Pryce character feels so helpless vis-a-vis the Al Pacino character in GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS owes less to difference in intelligence than in will. And the reason why the stupid woman in OLEANNA gains the upperhand over the smarter professor is because her newly chosen ideological commitment imbues her with a strong collective will.
Some individuals have powerful individual will, but those with weak individual wills often compensate by joining a cause or movement that imbues each member with special meaning and sense of mission. It’s like what Tom Conti’s character says of the Japanese in MERRY CHRISTMAS MR. LAWRENCE. The Japanese, being weak of personal will, couldn’t do anything on their own as individuals; they had to surrender to the collective hive-mind to gain the courage to become a major imperialist power in the Pacific. Needless to say, many on the Religious Right and many on the ‘Social Justice Left’ have weak individual wills and feel confused by independent inquiry and thought. They need to belong to a church or some organization committed to a neo-holy crusade. What makes Jews so formidable is they have the combination of strong individual will and high intelligence — and furthermore, a powerful collective mentality rooted in the Covenant that fuses identity, history, and spirituality(as well as territoriality via Zionism) into a bundled fasces. Even though Jews gained much by the use of reason, logic, and facts, they aren't primarily about principled Liberal commitment to Free Speech and Free Thought. Their core essence is about Obsession with Tribal Power and Prestige, and this means Jews will mold and distort ‘liberalism’ in any shape or form to serve, first and foremost, the agenda of Jewish Supremacism.
This accounts for the current Jewish-Orwellian contortions of logic and meaning. It’s as if Jews are pulling Houdini-mind-tricks. They come up with stuff like "We believe in free speech, but ‘hate speech’ is not free speech." Or they claim to denounce supremacism, all the while demanding that every politician in the US and Europe support the Zionist supremacist erasure of Palestinians and Wars for Israel that have decimated 100,000s of Arabs(who are regarded by Jews as subhuman). And Jews play Kafkaesque mind-games with us. Just like Joseph K. had no idea what he was being tried for and why, many people on the Social Platforms are confused as to what the rules are, who are to be allowed or denied service. In a way, Jews are using ambiguity as a weapon to keep everyone guessing because clarity allows people to readjust their expressions so as to comply with the Terms of Service. If Google offers only vague-sounding rules & regulations, it means you or anyone could be the next to be disappeared from Youtube, Facebook, or Twitter(overseen by ADL, a Zionist-Supremacist outfit). Through much of the 20th century, scholars interpreted Franz Kafka’s THE TRIAL and THE CASTLE as about the alienated Jewish consciousness in an elaborate & hostile world, one that seeks both more modernity and arch-preservation of old privileges. (As modernity with its populism and meritocracy undermines the Old Order of privileged hierarchy, the Power has to seek ever more 'esoteric' means via bureaucracy and laws to keep the castle gates closed to all but a few.) But given the developments in the 21st century whereby Jewish Supremacism has come to define so much of finance, foreign policy, media, and law & courts, one is tempted to see Kafka’s works as esoteric neo-Machiavellian manuals on how to exercise power by keeping those-without-power anxious, confused, and disoriented. When Jews didn't have the ultimate power, Kafka's works were their manifesto of protest; but now that they do have the ultimate power, Kafka's works have become manuals of privilege for the Jews. When one is rendered constantly off-balance, one doesn’t know which way to turn, in which case he must look to the Power for advice and guidance. Of course, the Power never gives the full game away. As the Pacino character says in GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS, "You never open your mouth unless you know what the shot is." The Power will nudge you here and there. It will intimate that some things are more 'right' and some things are more 'wrong', but there is no final say or clear instruction on anything. After all, the trick of Power is to monopolize meaning, memory, and message. Consider how Jews sprung the vile Jonathan Pollard out of jail, furnished him a plush job, and sunk the whole sordid affair into a memory hole; meanwhile, James Field who, in a state of panic, plowed his car into a bunch of violent proglodyte thugs is sentenced to over 400 yrs behind bars. If meanings were clear and understood equally by the powerful and the powerless, then the powerful themselves would have to stick by the rules in the eyes of the powerless who would clearly understand right-and-wrong. But if the rules are never certain, the powerful get to change the goal-posts as they please and offer up legal jargon shrouded with banality such as ‘inclusion’, ‘hate’, ‘diversity’, and ‘social justice’(as defined by them, of course; notice how the Jewish Power ignores all the livid hatred among Jews and Zionists). The powerful are often arbitrary in their use of rules, but they also know the simpleminded can be led by the nose with sophistry and sacraments. Consider the countless opportunities of making some issue or cause seem noble and necessary by associating it with struggle against ‘racism’. (In the 1990s, the hot item was associating 'environmentalism' with 'racism'. Anything gets more traction by being deemed 'racist'.) Or how the term ‘Diversity’ has become such a catch-all mantra among the Proglob that anything, even the craziest policy, can be justified as its agent.
Even post-religious and anti-religious modern people have ‘spiritual’ longing for the sacred. The most important thing among today’s so-called ‘Liberals’ is not the objective neutrality of free speech, free inquiry, logic & facts, rationalism, individualism, or freedom of conscience. Many ‘liberals’ may be interested in ideas, intellectualism, and culture in a dry cerebral way. What really wets them with meaning is righteousness or self-righteousness of being holier-than-thou over others, especially those deemed by the Power to be Wicked and Deplorable. Reading about ideas & culture satisfies their curiosity and staves off boredom(and may tweak their egos as hipster-sophisticates), but there is no great moral or ‘spiritual’ satisfaction to be had from engagement with mere intellect and/or senses. For full emotional satisfaction, they must play angels against the devils of the age. As most of them are weak of will & agency, they out-source the definition of Good vs Evil to the Higher Powers, and of course, Jews control the ivory tower of media, academia, courts, and the Deep State. Jews are the hands, and ‘liberal’ goy minds are the clay.
For Jews, the most important thing is not universal freedom or justice. This goes for Jewish ‘liberals’ too. Just ask the Palestinians. They get the same shit from Jews, whether it’s ‘conservative’ William Kristol or ‘liberal’ Chuck Schumer. Whether it’s Max Boot or Ezra Klein, Jews regard ideology as a mere weapon/instrument of the deeper agenda that is Power for the Tribe. And this is why a Jewish-controlled Liberalism cannot last for long as true liberalism. Sooner than later, it turns into Liberalism-In-Name-Only or LINO as Jews come to violate too many Liberal Principles to serve what is essentially their Tribal-Centrism. Furthermore, true liberalism will also crumble with the neo-spiritualist cravings of Political Correctness or ‘Wokeness’ that will happily sacrifice Liberal Principles in favor of Raptures of Righteousness. Passion overrules Principles, just like water can wet a dry towel but a dry towel cannot dry the water; it can only absorb the water and become wet itself. Another threat to Liberalism comes from the rise of celebrity and idolatry — worship of famous people as demigods or superstars — that promote vulgarity, immaturity, and stupidity that degrade the culture of intellect, reason, and critical thought, all of which rely on self-control, balance, and sense of responsibility.
Anyway, if the saving grace of religion is that holiness is with God or gods than with Man, the problem of post-religious Political Correctness or ‘Wokeness’ is it has elevated certain individuals and certain groups to holy status. Worse, no effort is necessary among members of the ‘blessed’ group to retain their sacredness and indulge in uncritical, unreflective, & unexamined self-worship. At the very least, Hindu yogis must undergo long years of study, struggle, and self-denial to gain holy status as enlightened ones who've found the pathway to the divine. In contrast, no effort is required if you happen to be Jewish, black, or homo according to the current Idolatry-Ideology or ‘Idology’ of PC. (According to LGBTQXYZ logic, you can be Divine just by donning a wig and dress and shaking your fat butt.)
You could be the most rotten Jew but still be holy because you’re one of the Holy Holocaust Tribe. Especially as the meaning of ‘Holocaust Survivor’ has become so comprehensive and ‘inclusive’ over the years — any Jew who lived in German-Occupied Territories during World War II can claim to be a ‘Holocaust Survivor’ even though he or she wasn’t anywhere near a Nazi concentration camp or in the Eastern blood-lands — , so many Jews today can claim to have some relative who was a ‘Holocaust Survivor’. And with the rise of Christian Zionism, there are plenty of Christian dummies who near-worship Jews as the Chosen People. As a self-anointed and self-deified holy people(as Jews control PC that bestows special blessings on peoples), Jews don’t need be good or even try. No matter how much money they steal, how many wars they instigate, how many Palestinians they kill, how many nations they subvert, and how many cultures they corrupt & destroy, Jews are to be revered and worshiped as the most tragic people of all time. Post-religious modernity didn't so much reject sacredness as realign it with worldly matters. Whether it was the Nazis or Jewish supremacists claiming moral immunity for their Special Kind(triumphant or chosen), it was a new kind of magical thinking. Though Nazi ideology was rooted in the cold science of Darwinism, it was also premised on Racial Romanticism of the Nietzschean Ubermensch. Jews also had their own racial-supremacist consciousness that goes way back to the concept of Chosen-ness, but Jewish ethno-arrogance was partly tempered or obfuscated by the moralism of their religion. Nazis claimed the right to conquer and kill simply because their kind was deemed superior. In contrast, Jews developed the habit of tirelessly rationalizing their power-moves and struggles for dominance as the will of God at odds with the sinfulness of mankind, usually more among the goyim than among the Jews. Thus, if the Nazi race war was clearly a race war, the Jewish race war was spun as something else, a moral-spiritual crusade by Jews against goyim who’d sinned in the eyes of God. This is why Jewish Supremacism has lasted for so long. Jews moralized and spiritualized their Will to Power and Acts of Conquest. Jewish racial agenda was given cover via references to the moral-sounding God. Jews today continue in this time-tested vein as their TALK(of 'Tolerance' and 'Inclusion') is really a moralistic means to cover up their WALK(of 'Is it good for Jews?').
Blacks and Homos are also members of The Blessed in our Age of PC as dominated by Jews. Like Jews, blacks don’t need to make an effort at being good. They are sacred simply because they are. Being Black means never having to say you’re sorry. You see, "it’s a black thing and you wouldn’t understand." It be magic and shit. As with Jews, the bestowal of sanctity to blacks has been most troublesome because blacks, like Jews, are among the most problematic peoples on Earth. Same goes for homos who constitute a group with neurotic levels of narcissism — how else can we explain the ass-o-ciation of the term ‘pride’ with homo fecal penetration, aka Poo-Ride. Now, if a group known to be nice, gentle, and kindly were elevated to sacred status, it would hardly matter to the world. Suppose Americans had very high regard for the Amish. Amish are a group that wants to be left alone and to leave other peoples alone. Thus, even if they were put atop the pedestal by rest of America, the chances are they would not try to exploit their vaunted status to rule the world. Suppose there's Nice Nancy and Nasty Nicole. Even if Nice Nancy were showered with love and affention, she is likely to remain nice; but if Nasty Nicole got the love, she would take full advantage and strut around as diva. Who/whom matters in social psychology. Unlike the hypothetically adulated Amish, Jews-as-new-messiahs demand that all of us suck up to them. Blacks demand that we see them as neo-pharaohs or something. And homos now display neo-aristocratic attitude toward the NSMFR — Normal, Straight, Male, Female, Real — folks who are most people. Homos see themselves as princelings who should lord over the straight peons, the ‘breeders’. Homo attitude is "Straight people undergo the drudgery of making life, and we homos cruise the dream-ship of enjoying life." And if homos want to play ‘family’, they take life created by heterosexuality and pretend that THEY, as homos, made life. It’s like humans take puppies from mother-dogs and pretend they are the ‘parents’ of the pupper. The way homos see it, straight people are chained to animal biological processes, whereas homos are ABOVE such essentialism. Homo ‘reality’ is as they imagine it, fantasize it, and dream it. Tranny fantasism is an offshoot of the homo stuff. This is why it’s dangerous to elevate such people to such high MORAL(and even spiritual) status. At least in traditional Judaism, the prophets were humble before God even as they talked like they knew more than everyone else. At least in Christianity, the most blessed people are the saints whose lives are about humility, selflessness, and piety. Sainthood can only be attained individually. It can’t be shared communally or passed down among relatives or friends. It doesn’t matter if someone in your community is a saint. You could still be a creep. It doesn’t matter if your uncle or best friend is saint. It doesn’t mean you get to share in his blessedness.
In contrast, in our post-God world, certain groups with particular strong egos & wills have made themselves into the new gods on an unconditional and collective basis. Without God above them, they think they are the center of the world. Indeed, even those who profess to be religious or ‘spiritual’ practice a kind of egocentrism or ethnocentrism whereby god revolves around them than other way around. For instance, anyone who is slightly acquainted with the Bible knows that it is NOT pro-homo and certainly not pro-Sodomite, but we have disgusting & vile homos like Buttegieg and Tim Cook of Apple saying that god blessed them with perverse desires to have penises rammed up their bungs and to suck other men’s penises. As for blacks, their reading of the Bible seems to amount to "God say white folks and all other folks better give us free stuff cuz we be da best and shit." And according to Jews, the entire world has to rotate around the axis of Jewish neurosis and megalomania. They have no understanding of humility. Homos see the whole world as their ass to buttfuc*. Blacks see the whole world as their hippo to hunt. Jews see the whole world as their milk-and-honey to be harvested by goy peons. Also, the neo-sanctity of Jews, blacks, and homos doesn’t operate like Christian Sainthood where individuals must follow the righteous path to attain the blessings of God. Instead, individual virtue be damned. All Jews, all homos, and all blacks are holy, sacred, and blessed according to ‘Wokonography’ & ‘Wokology’ simply for BEING Jewish, black, or homo.
Such has imbued all three groups with excessive, indeed noxious, levels of self-regard and arrogance, made all the worse by most Americans bending over backwards to suck up to one, two, or all three groups. Of course, it was the Jews who got to decide the holiness levels among various groups, and the result is Jews, blacks, and homos as the most emblematic or ‘talismanic’ identities. As other groups lack innate holiness, they must seek it from the radiance of others who have it, much like planets depend on the Sun for light and heat as they lack autonomous radiance.
In Catholicism, the faithful sought the relics(of holy saints) as spiritual vitamins. Christians, as sinners burdened with imperfection and compromise, worship the Perfect Being in the figure of Jesus Christ. People enter churches as holy spaces, something their own homes are not. In spirituality, few are 'warm-blooded' while most are 'cold-blooded'. God, Jesus, and angels don’t need humanity to be holy, but humanity needs God, Jesus, and angels to be blessed with holiness. God, Jesus, and angels have 'warm-blooded' spirituality that is self-generated. In contrast, humans are spiritually 'cold-blooded' and need the warm radiance of God, Jesus, and angels to be led on the righteous path, hopefully even to Heaven. Warm-blooded mammals generate inner-heat even in the cold. In contrast, fish, amphibians, and reptiles are cold-blooded and rely on outside environment to supply the heat, which is why we see turtles and snakes basking in the sun.
According to PC, the Holy Three of Jews, blacks, and homos are ‘spiritually’ warm-blooded, whereas most other groups, especially white folks, are cold-blooded. Jews don’t need the approval or adulation of others to be holy. Blacks are magic as Sun Folks. And for homos, ‘pride’ doesn’t have to be demonstrated and earned. A homo doesn’t have to find the cure for cancer and win the Nobel Prize to claim a bit of pride. All he has to do is prance around waving the homo ‘rainbow’ flag and take ‘pride’ in his practice of poo-ride, aka homo-fecal-penetration.
In contrast, other groups, especially whites, range from lukewarm-blooded to cold-blooded to ice-blooded. Muslims/Arabs, for instance, can be deemed as lukewarm ‘holy’ vis-a-vis ‘racist’, ‘xenophobic’, and ‘Islamophobic’ whites, but they are seen as dead-soul-cold vis-a-vis the holy Jews. Their ‘holiness’ is conditional and situational unlike the unconditional holiness of Jews, blacks, and homos according to Wokology. Because Jews, blacks, and homos are deemed to have intrinsic warmth whereas other groups(especially whites) do not, there is this obsession among whites and other groups to suck up to Jews, blacks, and homos to soak up some of the PC radiance. (Maybe Jews should come up with Philo-Semitic Soap for goyim. Rub your filthy goy body with some of that Jewish holiness.) This is why we see the phenomenon of NJBH(non-Jewish-black-homo) groups in America desperately trying to ally with Jews, blacks, and/or homos or to draw parallels between their own ‘plights’ or ‘struggles’ and with those of the JBH(Jew-black-Homo). So, pro-immigration-invasion advocates will say that illegals are the Southern Border are like the New Jews being persecuted by Nazis. Or various non-white NJBH groups will insist that their problems in the US are akin to blacks in the Civil Right Struggle. Sometimes, it gets kinda amusing, as when Palestinian-Americans argue they are the New Jews being tyrannized by Israeli Jews as the New Nazis.
If various lukewarm-blooded or cold-blooded NJBH & non-white groups seek alliances or associations with JBH to bask in the holiness, they also portray themselves as worthy of sympathy, compassion, and even a bit of extra serving of holy sunshine on the basis of their victimhood at the hands of Evil Whites. If Wokology says Jews, blacks, and homos are especially holy, it also says whites(especially if straight, male, and ‘right-wing’) are especially wicked. If some folks must be gods or angels, others must be made the Devil or demons. Thus, it’s morally advantageous to not only associate one’s own kind with JBH but to depict them as victims of EW or Evil Whitey. In religion, the devout seek salvation from God and delivery from the Devil. God is seen as life, Devil is seen as death. This is so EVEN IN CASES where God does the killings while the Devil offers shelter or sanctuary. The Bible is filled with stories with God killing lots of ‘innocent’ people and with Satan offering the temptation of relief. But even when God acts the ‘tyrant’, the devout seek the favors of God while denouncing the Devil. In the end, devotion > data. Even if the data showed that God killed more than Satan did and demonstrated the objective worth of Satan's offers, the devout must choose God because He is holy whereas the Devil, no matter how ‘generous’, is wicked and evil. This factor is what white folks never seem to understand about Wokology. It doesn’t matter how generous and good-hearted they are. It doesn’t matter how many overtures they make to other groups. The fact is Wokology paints whites as especially wicked and evil. So, even if white people give and give a lot, the takers will merely see the offerings as the gift of the Devil. In their hunger and greed, they will take the gifts of the White Devil but immediately denounce Evil Whitey just the same. Just look at the attitude of Somalis who’ve taken so much from whites but spit in the white face. Look how Jews act toward white Americans. Without Anglo-America, Jews would not control the world, but Jews feel nothing but contempt for Wasps. If a woman sees one man as handsome & wonderful while seeing another as ugly & gross, she will still want to be with the former than the latter, even as the latter offers her more gifts. She will take the stuff but still rebuff him. Love isn’t about materiality. One can love someone passionately even if he or she isn't objectively a 'good' person. One could find him or her to be especially beautiful, stylish, or dazzling. In contrast, one will not fall in love with someone who is gross but bears lots of gifts. Now, a woman may marry a rich gross man, or a man may marry an ugly gross daughter of a rich family, but there is no love there. One’s heart will never be with the gross person who offers plenty of stuff. Indeed, in such marriages, one is marrying the stuff than the person.
At any rate, wokology imbues certain groups with holiness and certain groups with wickedness. Of course, white People need not have become the Devil of the World. They became such because Jews took power of media/academia and because whites decided to suck up to Jews who hate them. Over time, a kind of Cycle of Contempt took hold in the Jewish-White relationship. The more Jews insulted, mocked, and berated whites, the more whites sucked and cucked up to Jews in the hope that, by demonstrating their fealty and devotion, Jews would stop being nasty and start loving whites. But white cuckery only emboldened Jews to be even nastier and more contemptuous toward whites. Then, whites tried even harder to cuck and suck up to Jews to gain their favor, and this made Jews feel even MORE contempt for sappy wussy whites. If you tell someone to lick your boot and if he does so, will you respect him all of a sudden because he sucked up to you? No, you will look down on him even further. Then, if you told him to open his mouth and peed into it, would you finally appreciate him because he is so loyal and servile to you? No, you would despise him even more. This is what whites fail to understand in their relation to Jews. The Cycle of Contempt must be broken IF Jews are to respect whites. Jews understand power, and unless whites make Jews fear White Power, Jews will continue to tell whites to open their mouths for golden showers and open up their bungholes for flagpoles bearing the Israeli flag.
Even though, Jews, blacks, and homos get to ‘morally’, ‘spiritually’, and ‘IDOL-ogically’ lord over the rest of humanity in the ‘Western’-Narrative-dominated World, things get a bit tricky and even testy when differences bubble up between the three holies, though the tensions are generally Jews vs blacks and Homos vs blacks than Jews vs Homos(as both groups are close and proximate in sensibility, outlook, profession, and cosmopolitanism). Jews and homos are also complementary in the way God and the Angels are. Jews are clearly many times more powerful than homos, but homos have their own advantages. Jewishness is fixed to Jews, and this factor limits the reach of Jewish power around the world. But every people have their share of homos, and in that sense, homo power is inherently more global than Jewish Power. Jewish Diaspora is worldwide, but there are many nations(even important ones)without a significant Jewish contingent. But even such nations have their homos who often feel bigger bond with homos around the world than with their own national kin. Unlike straight people whose real sexuality is about creating new life to carry on with culture and heritage, homos are all about indulging in a form of pseudo-sex — sodomy or homo-fecal-penetration — that can never produce life. So, homosexuality(or ‘inversexuality’ as homos invert all that is real) merely turns into a search of wild pleasure without thought of consequences. What does it matter into whose bung you stick your dong when sodomy cannot produce any life? So, if a lot of real-sexual or straight people approach sex as a means to mate with someone to produce children who will carry on with culture and heritage, homos approach their pseudo-sexual activity as a game of pleasure, or Game of Bones. It’s like Milo and Andrew Sullivan are perfectly happy with big black homo dongs up their soft white bungs. But because sodomy cannot produce life, homo identity is rather shallow.
While homos are horizontally advantaged over Jews because homos can be found in every nation, they are vertically disadvantaged because there is no such thing as homo lineage. Most homos are the children of straight parents, most of whom didn’t want to have homo children. (Today’s prog parents make a big fuss about how they are SO PROUD to have a son who takes dongs up his bung, but such strained enthusiasm suggests repression of their natural desire for non-homo kids. It’s like making an effort to enjoy spinach because you really don’t.) Not only are most homos the products of real sexuality by straight people, even when a homo man and a homo woman(lesbian) have a kid together, there is a much greater chance that the kid will be straight. As such, homo identity is more like mushrooms than trees; you never know where they will appear, and there’s no guarantee that new mushrooms will grow again on that spot. In contrast, the Jewish Community has a deep identity of Jews having Jewish kids who themselves grew up to have Jewish kids for thousands of years. Homos are like fungal spores, whereas Jews are like roots in their historical and ethnic consciousness. Thus, Jews wield more solid power. They have a clear sense of origin, place, and path. Jews and Homos are like Zeus and Hermes. Granted, Jews have been a mercurial people as well, and homo pagan-idolatry can be downright quasi-fascist & ‘Apollonian’ in vision, but Jewishness is rooted in patriarchy & continuity whereas queerness is flighty with pleasures of the moment. Thus, homos are useful to Jews in ways that angels are useful to God, or Hermes to Zeus(and Apollo). Jews are the prophets, and homos are the messengers. Jews are the producers, and homos are the players. But the relationship is as problematic as it is symbiotic, in the long run at least. After all, prior to the late modern era, it’s hard to think of a people who were more anti-homo than the Jews. If ‘reparations for homos’ ever become a thing, Jews should dole out most of the dough because because Judaism laid the foundation for the stringent anti-homo values of both Christianity and Islam. It was the Jews who regarded homosexuality as not merely weird, wrong, or gross but an abomination in the eyes of God Himself. But as Jews became post-religious and Jewishness became more about ethnicity than spirituality, Jews came to focus more on strategy for power and privilege than adherence to any higher moral value or spiritual command. Therefore, when Jews realized that a Judeo-Homo Axis could be very profitable(and even spawn a neo-religion in the form of cuckoo Globo-Homomania to push Christianity out of the nest of the West), they got over their traditional hangups. It’s also possible that homosexuality is more prevalent among Jews precisely because they were so anti-homo. In less anti-homo cultures, homos might have been allowed to do their homo things and not have children. But in the Jewish Community, being outed as a homo could lead to serious consequences, even death. So, Jewish homos likely gritted their teeth, got married, and had kids, thereby passing down their genes with homo tendencies.
What about Jews/Homos and blacks? Surely, there are complementary factors here as well. Jews run most of music industry, sports franchises, and mass media, and this means they have much to profit from blacks. In turn, as blacks are bigger in brawn than brains, they rely on Jewish smarts to succeed as rappers or athletes. Also, Jews and blacks cleverly use the White Guilt Trope and combine their Narratives of Holocaust and Slavery to make it seem like white folks are especially stained with sin for having caused harm to the two holiest groups in the world, the Desert Tribe and the Jungle Tribe. In a way, a reason why so many white folks took to Globo-Homomania is that a WHITE GENTILE PERSON can be one of the Holy People by wanting homo dongs up his bung. Of course, as most whites are not homo, only a relative few get to claim this holiness, but it’s still exciting for white folks that a white gentile can own holiness simply on the basis of BEING... a fruiter. It’s like Jimmy(Robert De Niro) and Henry(Ray Liotta) can never be ‘made’ in GOODFELLAS because they are half-Irish, but they are so happy that one of the crew, Tommy(Joe Pesci), has been chosen to be a Made Man. White people are so ecstatic about Globo-Homo because one of their own can be ‘made’ by taking a Negro dong up his bung. Consider how the Boston Straight Pride chose none other than Milo(of all people) to be its man of the hour.
Homos and blacks also have common interests. Homos are obsessed with idolatry, and because blacks dominate sports and music, many homos are totally enthralled with blackness, and many white homo men’s main desire is to take Negro dongs up their bungs. Also, as blacks are likely the most self-centered, self-aggrandizing, and megalomaniacal people on earth, they appreciate how homos in fashion and pop culture have done so much for the Black Image.
Still, there are major tensions between Jews/Homos and blacks as well. Jews and Homos tend to be intellectual, cultured, and sophisticated, whereas blacks tend to be rough, brutish, and wild. Jews and Homos prefer the Black Image over the Black Reality. They like to take aspects of blackness and fashion them into an idealized-idolatry, or ‘idealotry’, and indeed, much of the world knows blackness mainly in this ‘idealotrous’ form(via Hollywood, Music Industry, and Sports Celebrity) than in its raw form in the streets, which is usually ugly and demented(as tirelessly documented by Colin Flaherty). Jews and Homos prefer the Negro on TV than Negro in Reality, not least because Jews and Homos get to mold the Black Image in the media whereas blacks of raw reality insist on being unruly & ghastly and resist attempts to 'ennoble' them). Jews and Homos are experts at white-collar crime and cultural decadence, but they are not thugs in the streets, and they don’t destroy cities with rioting and looting. When it comes to crime, blacks are tops because evolution in hot Sub-Saharan Africa favored the hunter-warrior gene. So, despite the rhetorical unity among Jews, homos, and blacks, the fact remains that many Jews and homos fear black thugs and don’t want live in places with Too Many Blacks. Also, as blacks are often wild and unruly, their demented rages at whites in general can sometimes turn against Jews and homos, not least because both groups are seen essentially as ‘white’ by blacks. Furthermore, lack of black reflectiveness has them enraged over the fact that Jews and white homos are so much better off than blacks. (Of late, increasing numbers of blacks are envious and resentful of the fact that the elite-favored homo idolatry has knocked a few pegs off black holiness.) As far as blacks are concerned, they should have the most of everything since they be so ‘bad’ and ‘cool’ in stuff like sports and rapping, the ONLY things most blacks care about. Blacks think in primitive hunter-warrior terms. Among savages, the toughest warrior who can chuck the spear the farthest gets the most booty. Black view of reality is one-on-one. For hunters in a state of savagery, it’s Me and the Kill. In the modern world, things are far more complicated as it takes lots of brains, organizational skills, and expertise to write laws, manage enterprises, and maintain elaborate systems. The Negro mind has no patience for such things. It just thinks, "I’s the baddest mofo, so I’s deserve the most blings and shit." But Jews and homos have more gold than Negroes do, and this makes a lot of Negroes angry. While Negroes approach Jews and Homos as useful allies for the time being, they nevertheless regard them as The Enemy(and Whitey). As a result, Jews/Homos and Blacks often don't see eye to eye, made worse by the fact that blacks, especially in colleges, have plenty of ‘cold-blooded’ white supporters who, lacking self-generated heat of holiness, lean on ‘warm-blooded’ blacks to bask in the sunshine. Whenever blacks flip out, even to the detriment for Jewish power & privilege, white progs join in the stampede of rage and fury. In a way, these white progs are as vampiric as subservient vis-a-vis blacks. Because blacks are seen as ‘moral’ & ‘spiritual’ superiors, white progs get all sappy & servile at the feet of blacks as holy icons. But precisely because their cold-blooded selves lack innate sanctity, they try to absorb the holy heat of the Magic Negro. If white women got jungle fever, too many whites(even conservatives) need the Jungle Blanket to warm up their souls. Thus, many whites think nothing is more righteous than siding with holy blacks on ANY issue. Whenever there is another Hate Hoax, white progs are among the first ones to throw themselves into the fray, sometimes with bad results:
With the reality of black thuggery/criminality and the preponderance of ‘hate hoaxes’, one would think white progs would wake up to reality, but apparently, being ‘woke’ means to fall under hypnotic spell of Negro Worship as if everything is a 'civil rights struggle', the holiest event in US history that today's millennials missed out on and can relive only through new 'injustices' to fume over. Hate Hoaxes with the usual props of nooses and swastikas are part of the Halloweening of the Civil Rights Narrative. The psychology of spirituality is such that even all the evidence in the world cannot override one’s need for faith. Kevin Michael Grace is a smart and erudite person, but he feels a need to believe in the Gospels and their supernatural narrative of the Resurrection. There have been so many Catholic hoax-miracles, but the faithful were always eager to dispense with the latest fraud and witness the next miracle. Hate Hoaxes are like 'Smearicles'
that are meant to prove once again that Jews, blacks, and homos are pure-souled saints, angels, and gods who must be protected from Evil Whitey or Evil 'Homophobe'.
The psychology of holiness, like the psychology of hedonism, can easily overcome any supply of reason and facts. Gambling addicts rationally know the odds are against them, but they keep playing in the hope that the Next roll of dice will be the Big One, the jackpot miracle. Likewise, even when the faithful are presented with science(that disprove religion) and informed of the many frauds & corruptions of the church, they hold steadfast for the next miracle. In a similar vein, the reason why so many white progs are so blind to reality is they’re under the spell of magical thinking. From an early age, they’ve been instilled with the ‘idology’ of the Magic Negro, Holy Homo, and Wise Jew. Thus, they are incapable of holding rational views on the Holy Three of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. No matter the latest revelation of Jewish crookedness, black thuggery, or homo degeneracy — and no matter how many ‘hate hoaxes’ come our way — , their magical thinking continues to HOPE for the ‘miracle’ or 'smearicle' that confirms their faith that Jews, blacks, and homos are so holy-schmoly.
Of course, this allows Jews, blacks, and homos to doubly victimize the rest of the populace. Consider the Jews. Jews can do us wrong and then attack us of ‘antisemitism’ for noticing that they did us wrong. Thus, not only do Jews get to do us wrong but get to wrong us again by accusing us of feeling wronged by them, the Jews. Imagine that. Suppose Bob not only gets to steal from you but gets to condemn you for noticing that he stole from you. You’d be doubly wronged by Bob. Given the official holiness of Jews, blacks, and homos, they get to doubly do us wrong. Blacks commit lots of crime but also accuse us of ‘racism’ for noticing that they commit a lot of crime. So, not only are lots of whites victimized by blacks but they are forced to pretend they were not victimized by blacks. Call the thugs ‘teens’ or ‘youths’ or chant along to ‘Black Lives Matter’ when, in fact, too many blacks see no value in the lives of others, black or non-black. Jews can rob us blind and push for the Great Replacement. Indeed, Jews sometimes even brag about how they are at the center of demographic transformations in the West. But, lest you speak up about Jewish role in financial malfeasance and demographic imperialism, you are condemned as potentially ‘antisemitic’ if you dare entertain the thought of Jewish role in all this. So, you must suffer silently. You are victimized doubly by Jewish deed and Jewish decree. Jews not only get to burn your house down but get to shut you up lest you dare say Jews did it(which would be 'antisemitic'): As Jews are deemed holy, they couldn’t have done such a thing even if they did it. If a Jew burns your house down, the real crime according to Wokology is not that he torched your house but you might have noticed that HE, the Jew, did it. After all, if Jews are holy, then they can’t do unholy things, and that implies only an ‘irrational Anti-Semite’ would dare accuse the Jew. Or, if Jews do admit they burned the house, it must have been most justified(and even noble) because, being holy, whatever Jews do must be good and righteous. Then, it is not surprising that, on the issue of the Great Replacement, we get two narratives from Jews: "Only crazy Anti-Semites would believe that Jews engineered the Great Replacement of whites in the West" and "Yeah, we Jews did push for the Great Replacement, and it is most justified because you evil white Christian scum deserve to be conquered, humiliated, and owned." As for the holy homos, we have to pretend that they were NOT responsible for the HIV disaster since the 1980s. If anything, we have to tell our selves that homos were innocent victims of both HIV and uncaring ‘homophobia’. And of course, we have to pretend that the gross, sick, and ugly displays of ‘gay pride’ every year are akin to blessings from heaven. It’s all so demented.
When it comes to Jews-blacks-homos AND everyone else, the holy trio has the upperhand. It’s like kings and serfs, gods and mortals. But what about the intra-acrimony that sometimes flares among the Holy Three? It is like a parody of the war of the gods or the clash of the titans. A Jew can easily shut others down as ‘antisemitic’, blacks can shut down others as ‘racist’, and homos can shut down others as ‘homophobic’. The three cardinals sins according to PC are ‘antisemitism’, ‘racism’, and ‘homophobia’. But what happens when Jews, homos, and blacks are at loggerheads?
Consider the Zionists vs Ilhan Omar debacle. How was it ultimately resolved? By blaming WHITE PEOPLE in Congress over the feud between Jewish Zionists and Somali-black-Muslims. Generally, Jews and homos get along, but things may change as Homo Power goes from white to non-white. As the Muslim World remains mostly anti-homo, Homo power is mainly with Jews, but if non-whites become more prominent around the world in defining the Pink Agenda, the result may be a homo-tug-of-war whereby both Jews and their enemies will claim the right to the ‘rainbow’ banner. So far, Jews have found globo-homo very useful as a lubricant in their power game. Indeed, imagine a world without globo-homomania. Jews would have to exert their power AS JEWS upon goyim, and many peoples around the world would recognize this Power Move as JEWISH and ALIEN. While Jew-Worship is holy writ in the West, it has far less traction in the Non-West. Furthermore, many non-white nations have no taboos against bashing Jewish power and Zionism. Then, it’s no wonder Jews craved and concocted a proxy means to use their influence around the world, and their strategy was to ‘sacralize’ the homos in every nation and then use them as quasi-angels, heralds, and envoys of the Jewish god-men. But just like Christianity went from a Jewish thing to a Gentile thing, it’s possible that the Jewish-created Globo-Homo may truly go ‘universal’(or ‘buniversal’) and come to see Jewish Power as problematic. Already, there are homo Muslims in the US who denounce Zionism. And Ilhan Omar, despite her devotion to Muhammad, is an eager-waver of the globo-homo flag, though it could just be a case of opportunism.
Anyway, the Blacks vs Buttegieg confrontation was one of the most amusing instances of the ‘clash of the titans’. We know Buttegieg(who looks like a cross between Anthony Perkins, Bob Denver, and Howdy Doody) thinks he’s hot stuff simply because he’s a homo. He has imbibed homo-narcissism so fully that he believes even the Biblical God must revise His sacred laws to appease the homo community. Imagine that. Homos expect god in heaven to say, "Yes, I designed your anus, aka fecal hole, to be used as a sex organ, and there are few things more wonderful than the sight and smell of a ‘gay’ penis that’s been up the poopchute of another man." I suppose cancer is also a blessing because God meant us to have it. One cannot have a reasonable conversation with men like Buttegieg who are so full of themselves. With the backing of Jews as godmen, homos now have an easy time condemning and destroying anyone who is suspected of the heresy of ‘homophobia’, but, and it’s a Big But, things aren't so easy when a homo is confronted with the supposedly Noble Negroes. Just like homos think they’re hot stuff simply because they’re homo, blacks think they’re magical simply because they’re black. After all, the media, education, and state propaganda remind us constantly to love, respect, revere, and near-worship the Negroes because they are most magical-and-tragical-and-badassical-and-most-musical. Blacks have soaked this all up and filled themselves to the gills with boundless self-regard, and this means they never have to face the music or look in the mirror to understand their failings and realize what they must do to rectify the situation in places like St. Louis and Baltimore. Then, it’s hardly surprising that the blacks who confronted Buttegieg and the South Bend police department weren’t capable of thinking or expressing anything but "We totally right" and "You totally racist." Blacks bitch about ‘racism’ in the police department while overlooking the fact that most black deaths are at the hands of other blacks who are equally thug-like. A black grandmother yaps about her grand-kid being scare of cops, but why is SHE raising the kid? Where is the mother? The father? And of course, kids will believe anything they’re told. As too many black adults are idiots and morons, they tell their kids that white KKKops are out to kill them when, if anything, black-on-black murder rates go UP when the police retreat from black communities. And notice how the blacks always demand that OTHERS fix the problems that blacks caused. Now, it’s possible that MORE could be done by the government and society-at-large for the black community, but it is impossible when so many blacks just keep acting crazy and pathological even when more aid and programs come their way. Just consider the attitude of black students in well-funded schools with good teachers and high-tech equipment. Most of them just want to fool around and howl like apes.
In a sane and rational society that cares about the truth, we should be able to discuss these problems, but ours is not a sane/rational society but one with a perverted secular-sense of neo-spirituality that decided to elevate certain key identities as the new gods. Blacks being one of the god-races, they never need to examine themselves and their failings. Why should they? Blacks have been told over the years that they’re holy, magical, and awesome in every way. So, if anything goes wrong, it MUST be the fault of others. What a sick state of affairs. When the most pathologically savage race has been elevated to the highest spiritual status(along with Jews and Homos), it was bound to lead to all sorts of problems. Of course, this was one reason why Mass Immigration was welcomed as a buffer against dangerous blacks. Even as blacks were elevated ‘spiritually’, cities got worse with black gang/criminal activity. If whites had honesty and courage, they would have acknowledged the truth of racial differences and sought some kind of separation of the races(as Abraham Lincoln proposed), but the Magic Negro trope became so sacrosanct that, even after the L.A. Riots and OJ Simpson fiasco, whites refused to face the reality and continued to believe in the holiness of blacks, incredibly even as they took to white flight from black areas; it just goes to show the power of idolatry over reality. Besides, no matter how much crime and violence blacks commit in any given year, there is the new Rap hit, the new Oprah episode, the new PBS documentary about MLK & Civil Rights, the new basketball and football seasons that have countless whites screaming at the top of their lungs for their black gods and heroes. And white women came down with jungle fever, and white men got used to cuckery and even came to see it as necessary to bring about racial reconciliation via the Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs or ACOWW.
Besides, gods are supposed to be above the law, right? The laws of man don’t apply to the gods who live with their own laws. The rise of celebrity culture centered around a**hole-athletes and thug-rappers especially led to the notion that morality and laws are for little people, the lame losers. As blacks are the ‘cool’ god-race, they don’t have to play by ‘white’ rules, and indeed their transgression is all the more ‘badass’ for its taunting nigga-nihilism. It’s a kind of ‘Nigzscheanism’. And Jews and homos feel the same way. Jews now think and act like god-men with the power and right to subvert, loot, destroy, and/or transform any society by whatever means available. Consider the creep George Soros or the monster Sheldon Adelson who says a nuke should be lobbed at Iran. According to Jews, Israel can ignore international inspections and make nukes whereas Iran, a nation with no nukes, must be sanctioned and wrecked economically. As for Palestinians, just forget about it. Jews are holy, Palestinians are shit, and as far as Jews are concerned, white folks in Europe and US are just More Palestinians to degrade, dehumanize, and exploit. And we are all familiar with how nihilistic the homo and tranny communities are. For them, ‘morality’ or the ‘good’ is whatever that flatters and celebrates them as the new angels. They even took over many churches that now have clergy with homo colors preaching that Jesus died on the Cross so that homos can claim sodomy as godly and trannies can cut their dicks off & read stories to young children.
Then, it is most fascinating to observe the clash of nihilisms among groups that would be gods. Buttegieg, who is so full of himself(when his howdy-doody bung is not filled with homo dongs), walks around straight white people like he’s the second coming or something — after all, being homo makes him holy whereas straight white people are without innate sanctity — , but he finds himself perplexed, disoriented, and even afraid among blacks, the other god-race. If angry whites got aggressive with him, he could just dismiss them as ‘homophobes’ or ‘bigots’, but he’s flustered among Noble Negroes(even though blacks act noble only in Hollywood movies). On the one hand, as a white homo, he has achieved much more than most blacks, many of whom are poor and even desperate in the run-down black parts of South Bend. Also, he is the darling of powerful Jews and the elite class. In contrast, the blacks who are hollering at him in the video are the dregs of society with no prospects. And yet, because they are black and what blackness symbolizes in the American PC discourse, Buttegieg’s magical powers as a holy homo is much diminished in the presence of angry, nasty, and unruly Magic Negroes(who act more like Manic Niggaz). Blacks in South Bend won't south-bend-over to Buttegieg's homo holiness. In some ways, it’s even funnier than Ilhan Omar vs the Zionists on Twitter over who has more Wokemon Intersectional Points. Especially hilarious is the moment when Butt-Plug is grilled by blacks as to whether he believes 'black lives matter', and the butter-butt-boy's voice cracks with emotions like he wants to cry or something. It reminds us of George W. Bush saying that the WORST moment of his presidency was when trashy Kanye West said Bush doesn't like black people. Never mind blacks don't value the lives of fellow blacks. Whether in black Africa, Haiti, Jamaica, UK, or US, blacks love to kill other blacks because the core mentality among blacks is not "Is it good for the blacks?" but "Is it good for ME?" As cunning and lowdown as Jews can be, at least they hold onto the value of Honor Among Jewish Thieves. Blacks will destroy other blacks just to get 'what is mine'. While Bush could have done more in the wake of Katrina, the real problem was blacks either sat around for OTHERS to solve all the problem or, worse, went on looting rampages and reveled in chaos during the crisis. For blacks, 'never let a crisis go to waste' means rob, rape, and rampage all you want while the lights are out. And based on reports of the death in South Bend, it seems to be another case of the police taking drastic measures to put down a crazed thug or criminal. But, it never registers among blacks that maybe-just-maybe their behavior is at the root of these problems. And the Jew-run media that follow the PC script portray blacks as perennial victims even when they're the perpetrators of most of the violence in America. And jerks like Mayor Buttplug and George W. Bush are more triggered and distraught by accusations of "You don't care about black folks"(that has the effect of "You don't believe in God" in a devout religious community) in our dumb-dumb culture that takes cues from the church of wokology. If Mayor Buttplug had real integrity in a society that valued it, he would have shot back to the blacks, "Look, you blacks wallow in trash culture, threaten each other, act like thugs, and do the most slaughtering of blacks in this town and across the country. So, why don't you black shits stare in the mirror and face the music for a change instead of twerking your asses to trashy rap music." In current US, blacks act like apes but we are supposed to see them as angels. Ape-Angels or Apegels are what blacks have become.
This really has to end. We can’t have an honest and truthful debate about things that really matter in a nation where certain groups get to play gods over the rest. It is disconcerting and dangerous, not to mention deeply corrupting, not least because Jews, blacks, and homos are especially problematic groups. Jews, with their higher IQ, strong personality, & tribal heritage, are favored by circumstances to gain great wealth and power. Such a powerful and influential people must be scrutinized and criticized honestly, or their power will grow cancerous and pathological, as it certainly has already in our world. And blacks, with their greater aggression and muscle power, can cause lots of harm as thugs, criminals, bullies, and lunatics. Unless we discuss the Black Problem honestly, we’ll just end up with more Fergusons. Screaming BLM when blacks are the ones who are committing the most robberies, rapes, and murders is a sign that the US has fallen into the vortex of inverse reality. And homos have special talents in arts & design, and many of them have become rich and powerful. But their vanity can get the best of them, and we now live in a world where homos aren’t satisfied with tolerance & individual freedom but demand and mandate that we all bend over to their self-image as new angels of some ‘rainbow’ fantasy world. It’s like we’ve all been sucked into the fantasy dream of Liberace and Michael Jackson through the cocaine-laced anus of Elton John. Homos not only claimed the term ‘gay’ but ‘pride’, and the West allowed this to happen without any moral, political, and spiritual resistance because our world has been so corrupted by the lies, egos, vanities, and sick prides of devious Jews, demented blacks, and degenerate homos.
We need HUMANISM that sees all peoples as humans with potential for good and bad. Being human doesn’t mean you’re innately good or bad. It means you can be good, you can be bad. At any rate, you must try to understand the world and yourself. And everyday, you must make an effort to be a good person and learn to be self-critical as critical of the world around you. Nazism and Communism failed because they both rejected or failed humanism. Nazism elevated the Aryan-Europeans as the Noble Superior Race, and that meant they were above the norms of rest of humanity. So, just like Jewish supremacists so full of themselves think any number of Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, Russians, and white people may be sacrificed at the altar of "Is it good for Jews?", the Nazi Aryanists believed than any number of Slavs in Russia could be sacrificed to make way for the superior Teutons. Ironically, what Jewish Hegemonists and Nazis have in common is the conceit of Racial Supremacism. Jewish globalists claim to be anti-supremacist, but all their berating of ‘white supremacism’ is to distract us from the undeniable fact that US essentially operates as a Jewish-Supremacist warship. If indeed Jews are all about equality, why don’t they support BDS and demand that the US government treat Israeli Jews and Palestinians equally? Why don’t Jews demand that Israel be sanctioned for having nukes while Iran be rewarded for NOT having nukes? Why don’t Jews complain that Jews are vastly over-represented in elite industries and institutions? Jews use the ‘social justice’ Talk to hide the tribal-supremacist Walk.
Anyway, whether it’s the Nazis honestly yapping about racial supremacism and practicing it OR Jewish globalists dishonestly yapping about racial equality while practicing the opposite, the notion of the holy races is deeply corrupting to humanity, morality, and public discourse. Just like serfs could never talk freely with kings, the less holy or unholy peoples cannot speak honestly with or about holy peoples because anything deemed offensive to the holies is TABOO. The result is the scenario in "Emperor’s New Clothes". It is anti-humanist. Now, humanism doesn’t say all humans, as individuals or groups, are equal in intelligence, ability, or integrity. However, it does say that even the lowest human is still human and deserving of some recognition as a member of the human species. Also, it says even the smartest and/or most capable person in whatever(science, arts, athletics, philosophy, spirituality, etc.) is ultimately nothing more than human. He may be an impressive human but still a human, not a god or superhero. Humanism grounds us in reality. It reminds us that even humans with seemingly godlike powers -- Beethoven, Shakespeare, Newton -- were, in the end, mortal, limited, and flawed. The Germans and Japanese in World War II got to thinking and behaving as if they were made of god-dust. Nazis relied more on pseudo-science whereas Japanese relied more on myth, but the end-result was the same. Both vastly overestimated themselves and underestimated the rest of humanity. Now, communism, in its emphasis on the justice for the proles, had something of a humanist streak, but it failed because genuine humanism was compromised and swept asunder by the deification of History as embodied by the Great Man(such as Stalin or Mao as god-men). As communism had little use for the individual, it had a tendency to see humanity as a mass than a collection of fragile and vulnerable persons. In the name of history, it came to regard humanity as cannon fodder for the revolution, which explains why Stalin and Mao were willing to expend millions of lives to realize their grand visions. While humanism doesn’t reject grand history, it never loses sight of individuals who make up humanity. These individuals are fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, sisters, brothers, cousins, friends, neighbors, and comrades. They are not mere pawns in some sick game of power played by men who would be gods.
Humanism and Nationalism go together because they both understand the need for limits. Beyond humanism is the nihilism of god-ism or Divinism, which is most dangerous because humans can never be gods. (We’ll leave it up to Cuckoo Michio Kaku to cook up some technology to turn us into ‘gods’ like in the AKIRA anime.) Beyond nationalism is imperialism where one nation comes to regard itself as so great and awesome that it has a might-is-right claim to conquer and dominate other peoples. Humanism and Nationalism are the Goldilocks Rule between the extremes of high and low. Below humanism is animalism, an outlook that says humans should surrender to the most vulgar and base desires of the Id. Paradoxically, god-ism and animalism seem to reinforce each other in the modern world. Why would this be if one aims high while the other one aims low? When people regard themselves as godly, they feel they are above the law and get to do as they wish. After all, what is the point of being gods if you can’t indulge in your power? So, those who regard themselves as godly come to indulge in all sorts of piggish vices that make the animal-like. This was a problem with both Greek and Germanic gods. Zeus and Odin were great noble gods, but all that power also led them to indulge in all sorts of vices and pleasures, especially in wooing lots of women to the fury of their wives. It was when men like Stalin, Hitler, and Mao gained godly amounts of power that they became most dangerous as brute-tyrants. Nazis and Japanese regarded themselves as quasi-divine races, but this led them to carry out some of the most barbaric acts in World War II. Why would godly men do such things? Because being godly, they are above the law and free to indulge in their arrogance and powerlust. So, feeling godly can be the pathway to acting like animals. It’s also true the other way around. Consider the trashy rappers who shamelessly indulge in crude, ugly, and vulgar animalistic behavior. But being so lowly, why would they be so full of themselves as the demigods of our age? Because animalism is all about unfettered aggression and domination, and this leads to mad adrenaline rushes to be the ‘baddest mothafuc*a in the world’. Winning at boxing surely got Muhammad Ali to thinking he is the ‘greatest’.
We don’t need animalism or god-ism(or Divinism). We need humanism. And we need nationalism as the Goldilocks Rule between insane individualism or petty tribalism(on the clan-kin-gang level) AND imperialism that has no sense of limits. If imperialism is too arrogant & ambitious, individualism/tribalism is too small-minded and limited to serve as the basis of a complex modern society. But it seems our age is ill-suited to accept the Golden Middle as ideal for most peoples and the world. Eric Hobsbawm’s book on the 20th Century was called THE AGE OF EXTREMES, and the 21st Century seems like an Age of Excesses. The idea of ‘middle’ is attacked from all sides. Anti-Middle-ism is the rule of the day. Middle Class is to be sacrificed on the altar of globalism. Nationalism as Middle-Political-Arrangement is to be swept aside to make way for the excesses of globalist-imperialism and tribal-animalism. Look at the US and EU, and we see the rise of both intensified globalism and increased tribalism. London has become more globalized under Jewish globo-homo imperialist hegemony, but it’s also becoming more animalized & tribalized with black crime, ethnic tensions, social distrust, and gang behavior.
Same in France, a post-nation that is more globalized by the day but also torn asunder by religious, ethnic, and class divisions. Even though the Hungarian Model of the nation-state is the sane middle-position, both the globalist-imperialists and animalist-tribalists denounce it as ‘far-right’ and ‘extreme’. Apparently, the Sorosian Jewish-globalist model of radical macro-demographic transformations and the Neo-African model of invading other nations to practice micro-animalist behaviors such as ‘twerking’, running around with machetes, and tossing acid at people’s faces is the New Normal. (When Europe was homogeneous, the reactions against the middle by the extremes of left and right might have fueled greater progress. Left pushes society forward, and the right offers necessary respite that stabilizes society for another round of revolutions. The stabler 80s were necessary for the nation to recover from the excesses of the late 60s and 70s. The constant push and pull between the left and right led to more dynamism. The social pendulum of Modern Europe was more active than in the Traditional East that favored the notion of the Middle Road that grew overly static and stagnant. In a homogeneous nation, the forces of both right and left can be as infuriating as inspiring, but there is one constant in that both the right and the left share in the national identity, history, and territoriality. Left or Right, it's national vs national. But when globalism diversifies a nation, the back-and-forth swing between left and right is no longer a family affair but becomes a game of the Other vs Us, and this is bound to be destructive than constructive. The 'pendulic' swing on the national level between left and right gave the West an advantage over the Middle-centrist Orient, but the anti-middle-ist mode may prove to be fatal to the West because the ideological debate is not between 'leftism is better for OUR people' and 'rightism is better for OUR people' but between 'others should take over our nation' and 'we should keep our own nation'. Swedish left vs right used to be about 'good for Swedes' vs 'good for Swedes'. If two nations are both nationalist-homogeneous, the one with left-right dynamism may gain over the middle-stable one as creative sparks are more likely to result from friction of controversy than inaction of conformity. But when the left-right dynamism is about whether a people should keep their nation or surrender it to foreigners, especially black-African savages, that nation is in real danger, and the safer bet is the nation that seeks the middle-ground despite its stasis. Of course, neo-fascism offers a formula of left-right friction on the national level.)
Homos can’t stand the Golden Middle either. There used to be a time when it seemed possible that society could meet homos halfway. Let homos be homo and do their own thing and let us tolerate them for what they are. But that was not enough for homos. With the backing of Jews, homos demanded that they be elevated to god-status and be celebrated. Entire city blocks had to be shut down for mass ‘gay pride’ parades. Homo flags and colors had to be shown on massive buildings. Churches must fly the homo flag, and if you don’t bake the ‘gay wedding’ cake, you must be destroyed by lawfare. The lesson to take from this is that you can arrive at the Goldilocks Rule ONLY WITH people who have a sense of limits and give-and-take. Just like Hitler was impossible to negotiate with since he wanted everything his way, one should be careful about negotiating with peoples such as Jews, blacks, and homos who are naturally disposed to be egotistical, megalomaniacal, narcissistic, and/or vain to the max. In a way, it’s most fitting that our age has seen the destruction of much of the Middle East, the cradle of civilization from which so much history, culture, and arts emanated. The middle of the world between north and south, east and west, could not be left alone. It had to be destroyed and turned upside down at the behest of Jews who are now addicted to excessive megalomania.
To regain equilibrium in the world, we need to demote the new would-be god-races of Jews, homos, and blacks. If we are to deal with them as humans, as people, we must take away their mythic ‘made’ status as holy groups who are above the laws and norms that apply to the rest of us. It’s telling that Jussie Smollett is a Jewgromo, a Jew-Negro-Homo. He has so many holy-schmoly Wokemon points that he could pull off a obvious hoax, be showered with sympathy from celebrities & politicians, and then have his case dismissed after his stunt was indisputably exposed as a hoax meant to defame the white race. The end result of the deification of the Holy Three of Jews, Negroes, and Homos is the Folly of Jussie Smollett. In him we saw Jewish perfidy, black obnoxiousness, and homo vanity. As Jews, blacks, and homos have tremendous power of one kind or another over the US that controls the world, we cannot allow them to keep playacting as gods above us. What sane person wants to kiss the ass of Jussie Smollett and his ilk? And yet, that is what the US does and makes the rest of the world do. Needless to say, the Jewish supremacists at Google rigs search results to suppress stories about Smollett's shameless hoax. Divinism among Jews, blacks, and homos means that they play by their own rules in contemptuous disregard for the truth.
