Using the Covid-29 crisis to push nationalism against globalism is good and sound.
Oddly enough however, so-called nationalists in the West are attacking Chinese Nationalism. But if Chinese being nationalist is wrong, it then follows that nationalism itself is wrong. And that means West shouldn't be nationalist like China(and Russia)... which is self-defeating to nationalists.
China used globalism for nationalist purposes. It believes in China First.
And Western nations should use the World Order for their own national interests.
But when people in the West attack Chinese nationalism, they are attacking nationalism itself. It's like Tucker Carlson denouncing China for being 'ethno-nationalist'. Funny coming from someone who opposes immigration on grounds that all of US will turn into California. (But his confused or hypocritical self is full of praise for Zionist ethno-imperialism.)
Russia has shown that a nation can be nationalist and work with China. China has never been opposed to other nations being nationalist. China and Russia get along despite tensions(historical and geopolitical) because both understand and respect each other: Russia uses the alliance for Russian interests, China uses the alliance for Chinese interests. Russia is okay with Chinese nationalism, China is okay with Russian nationalism... as long as neither goes imperialist on the other.
So, why not follow the Russian model? What does Russia do? It pursues Russian nationalism without denouncing Chinese nationalism. That way, Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism can co-exist side by side. They can hammer out differences and compromise on certain matters on basis of mutual understanding.
The problem isn't Chinese nationalism or even Chinese globalism. Pakistan and Iran are far less rich and powerful than the US, but they maintain their sovereignty vis-a-vis China. They trade and cooperate on certain interests without surrendering their power to China. Even impoverished North Korea(with 1/40th of the economy of South Korea) has managed to do its own thing in defiance of China.
But we are to believe that the rich and mighty West has been helpless to stop Chinese power and influence? ROTFL. True, Chinese business interests have moved aggressively into Canada and Australia, but whose fault is that? Anglos turned into a bunch of worthless cucks who measure everything in terms of money and 'woke' virtue-signaling about 'muh diversity'.
What did Sun Tzu say in the Art of War? Power is like water. It generally runs into open spaces. So, when Anglo nations went cucky-wuck and opened themselves to Chinese people and money, guess where a lot of people and money went? China didn't forcibly invade the West(like the West once did against China). Rather, Canada and Australia freely opened themselves up to Chinese people and money(as well as to Hindus, Arabs, and even thuggish Sudanese blacks).
But why did Anglos go from proudly race-ist and nationalist — Canada and Australia used to have WHITE ONLY immigration policies — to globalist, 'anti-racist', cucky-wuck, and pro-diversity? Why did Anglos allow Africans and Muslims to take over entire parts of London? Because Mao sent his Red Guard hordes to conquer them? Because Jackie China and Bruce Lee's ghost led an army of kung fu warriors to invade the West? No, because Anglos let Jews take over the West, and Jew filled white minds with 'white guilt', jungle fever, self-loathing, diversity-mania, and 'muh restaurant' lunacy.
Jews made Anglos cuck to the Other(the Primary Other being Jews of course). Once Anglos got into the habit of cucking to Jews, it was only a matter of time before other groups followed the Jewish Lead: Chinese, Hindus, Arab Sheiks, illegals from Latin America, the African invasion, etc. They all learned to chant 'diversity' and 'racism' to gain increased entry into the rich and clean West. And as white minds were colonized by Jewish PC, whites just nodded along. Keep in mind that until Donald Trump came along, 'nationalism' was a dirty word among nearly all Western elites, intellectuals, journalists, and managerial class.
Russia showed what a nation can do. Russia partly regained national sovereignty from Jewish globalist oligarchs. It has operated on basis of nationalism(relative to the rest of Europe) since. So, when it deals with China, it is on the basis of Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism respecting each other. Russia doesn't have to vilify China, and China doesn't have to vilify Russia.
But US, Canada, UK, and Australia are without Anglo sovereignty. Anglos(like Derbyshire himself) are sorry cucks to Jewish Globalists. If Anglos had sense, they wouldn't opt for anti-Sinicism. Rather, they would argue that white nations must be like China, Russia, and Iran in regaining national sovereignty and operating on the basis of national interest. This can be done without anti-Chinese rhetoric as Russia proved. Initially, China respected Trump as a tough-talking nationalist. Chinese nationalism can work with other nationalisms. Alas, Trump turned into just a cuck to Jews who talks nationalism but engages in continued US globo-homo hegemonism and imperialism. (Also, as Deep State operatives are addicted to the hyper-power game of globalist-imperialism, they despise nationalism as 'small potatoes'. For them, the only game that matters is the globalist contest of world domination. So, instead of envisioning a future where American Nationalism and Chinese Nationalism co-exist peacefully, they can only think in terms of American globalist supremacism vs Chinese globalist supremacism. They project their own supremacism onto others. It's like Jews project all their pathology onto Russia. The difference is China wants to trade with the world but has no interest in spreading 'Chinese values' or 'Chinese ideology', whereas American missionary impulse, Anglo imperial-adventurism, and Jewish supremacism are addicted to transforming the entire world.)
It's weird how Anglo nations are many times richer than Russia(that is strong in military but weak in economy) but politically many times weaker. The West is like one big Hong Kong under British Rule: Rich but a puppet of the Brits. Today, Anglo nations are rich but political and ideological colonies of Jews. When China deals with Russia, it is with a second-rate economic power but a first-rate political power. When China deals with the West, it is with a first-rate economic power but a third-rate political power. Just look at Justin Trudeau or the female leader of New Zealand. Even tough-talking Trump regularly takes it up the ass from Jews and acted as their hitman in the murder of hero Soleimani, the Iranian patriot who's been battling terrorists in Syria. All such Western goy politicians are mere tools and puppets of Jews. But Jews are so powerful that they can hide their power, and goy-cucks play along with the hope that, if they suck up to Jews just one more time, Jews will be nice to them. So, white 'liberals' blame Russia for everything, and white 'conservatives' blame China for everything. Jewish Power manipulates and corrupts US politics, but we had three long years of Russia Collusion nonsense. Jews control US institutions, but we now get 'China Inc or Chinc. controls everything'. It's downright hysterical.
There was a time when the West was both a first-rate political and first-rate economic power. White Christian elites ruled, and they were united as one people with white Christian masses. But over time, Jews took over, and white elites became managerial cucks serving the Jewish globo-homo agenda. And white masses were to be replaced by White Nakba, race-mixed with jungle fever & bamboo fever, and/or killed off with opioids(sold by Jews who once sold opium to the Chinese). Then, the cure is obvious: White Liberation from Jewish supremacism. Unity of white elites and white masses. Nationalism like in Hungary. But we hear NONE of this from the likes of Tucker Carlson. All we get is blaming China for globalism that is really the tool of Jews. The truth is China is prepared to deal with nationalist white nations. Rise of nationalism in White Nations may be disadvantageous to China in certain areas, but Chinese are not ones to tell white nations what to do. (The 'woke' anti-white Chinese in the West are the products of Western PC media and academia controlled by Jews. Chinese in China tend to despise the 'white left'.) They will adapt to the new reality. The one group that is most hostile to revival of nationalism in white nations is the Jews. This is why Jews are now urging whites not to restore nationalism in white nations but to attack Chinese nationalism as the source of globalism's problems. By blaming Chinese NATIONALISM, snuff nationalism in the West as well.
The problem is Anglos are doing NOTHING about the source of US enslavement to globalism: Jewish Power. If anything, they are pretending China is the master of globalism and forced globalism on the West. This is total nonsense. Jews pushed globalism on the West. Jews urged big business in the West to dump on their own workers and send factories to Mexico & China and outsource to India. Jews in Silicon Valley invited all those Hindus. Jewish New York Times hires Hindu and Chinese 'woke' scholars to dump on whites. China didn't create this World Order but merely took part in it. Also, despite all the corruption and brutality of current China, it did make real products and shipped them to other nations, which did a helluva lot more for the world than Jews in Wall Street making trillions via financial manipulation.
If Anglos followed the Putinist model, they could bring back white pride and white-majority nationalism in the West. And then, they could deal with China on the basis of mutual respect. If China currently doesn't respect whites, it's because whites cuck to Jews. Chinese know Jews rule the West. And as whites are cucks of Jews, whites adopted Open Borders and can't say NO to mass immigration-invasion. So, if whites want pride and power back, they must come to terms with Jewish Power. But whites are so in awe of Jews(and so frightened of them) that they are in Alex Jones mode: Jones was deplatformed by Jews but blames the 'Chicoms' for his woes, perhaps in the hope that if he grovels before Jews by blaming everything on China, his accounts will be restored in Jewish-monopolistic platforms.
Whites must blame Jews for globalism. Whites must restore nationalism and white identity by pushing back against Jewish Power. But people like Tucker Carlson and John Derbyshire suck up to Jews... even though Jews hate them most. (It's like Jared Taylor has been denied Twitter and Paypal by Jews, but the fool censors anyone who speaks truth to Jewish Power at American Renaissance.) Jews even fund Antifa that went to Carlson's house and threatened his family. Derbyshire has been de-personed in journalism because Jews smeared him as 'white supremacist'.
Instead of confronting Jews to regain white identity and white-majority nationalism, whites are attacking Chinese nationalism. White 'conservatives' attack Chinese nationalism and white 'liberals' attack Russian nationalism. But if nationalism is bad, then it must be bad for the West too. But if nationalism is bad for China, Russia, and the West, how do we counter and control globalism?
White people need to restore nationalism and come to terms with Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism(and Iranian nationalism and etc), but instead they blame China for globalism while being utterly amnesiac about the fact that the West embarked on globalism that was created by Jews and Anglo-traitors. If whites don't restore nationalism and merely blame China for globalism, then the result will be continued globalism, especially as the REAL source of globalism goes unmentioned: Jewish Power.
Also, if the West is to pursue nationalism, it must give up on imperialism. It is downright hypocritical for the West to bitch about China(and Russia) when the US and NATO invaded and destroyed nations in Middle East and North Africa in Wars for Israel. It is Trump, tool of Jews, who is interfering in Venezuela. Also, how many Chinese naval bases surround the US? How many US military bases surround China? Who created the mess in Ukraine by instigating a coup?
Wittingly or not, John Derbyshire is merely a shill of Jewish globalists who are trying to blame China for the World Order that Jews have created. If nations like US, Canada, and Australia were to go nationalist and ban further Chinese immigration and investment, China will accept the policies and learn to live with them. It is Jews who will go crazy and denounce white nations as 'racist', 'xenophobic', and 'nazi' at the slightest whiff of white majority interests. It's the Jews and castrated white cucks who insist that even the sentiment "It's Okay to be White" is 'racist'. Has China or Russia denounced Viktor Orban and Hungary? No, all the hatred comes from Jews, and those Jews are well-served by Anglo-cucks who now bark like dogs at the feet of their Jewish masters.
It’s difficult to think of another country more different from the United States than North Korea. United States is big, North Korea is small. United States is rich, North Korea is poor. United States is free and democratic, North Korea is totalitarian and repressive. United States is individualist, North Korea is collectivist. And yet, there are striking, even alarming, similarities between the two nations in the area of political psychology. It goes to show that even a ‘free’, ‘liberal’, and ‘democratic’ order can come under the same kind of controls that curse and bedevil a tyranny modeled on Stalinism and Oriental Despotism.
Why would this be so? It’s because both North Korea and the United States now have in common a kind of infantilization of the masses, quasi-spiritualization of tyrannical & parasitic forces, military muscle-flexing as substitute for genuine moral legitimacy, a politics of fear-mongering & scapegoating, radical witch-hunting hysteria, and the ‘cravenization’ of the managerial elites to the overlords & oligarchs.
Even though North Korea is a closed society of which even experts have limited knowledge, we know that (1) it is ruled by the Kim Clan (2) Kim dynasty isn’t merely dominant but deified and worshiped, therefore making it a ‘spiritual’ as well as political crime to dissent against the Power (3) rational discussion & factual inquiry are suppressed, often banned (4) emotional hysterics are instilled and encouraged among the masses in their support of the Kims (5) all the faults and problems of the system are blamed on OUTSIDE forces that aren’t merely denounced but demonized (6) pageantry and idol-worship dominate ideological ‘thought’ (7) historical victimization is exploited to justify whatever insane policy the regime concocts next, and furthermore, the pathology of self-pity blinds the nation to its own evils (8) there is an exaggerated sense of self-importance.
Now, such faults and problems are to be found in all nations and regimes around the world. It’s like greed and mendacity are a common feature of humanity. The world is not made up of sinners on the one side and saints on the other. All people have the sinner and the saint in them. It’s really a matter of degrees, and North Korea really takes the cake when it comes to political pathology, indeed so much so that many in the West glibly regard themselves in stark opposition to the lunacy that is North Korea.
Yet, even as the two nations are vastly different and there are many areas in which the United States is infinitely superior and more humane than North Korea(and other comparable nations) is, Americans mustn’t be too quick to congratulate themselves, especially given what has happened to America since the end of the Cold War and where it is headed in terms of politics, economics, culture, and demographics. Also, just because a nation happens to be ‘free’ and ‘democratic’ doesn’t mean that liberty and participatory politics are being utilized in the furtherance of freedom and democracy. ‘Freedom’ and ‘democracy’, under clever and sinister manipulation by the powers-that-be, can lead to less freedom and eventually tyranny, indeed where the West seems to be headed these days. (Worse, West may be headed toward civilizational collapse, in which case many Western nations may end up even worse than North Korea a hundred years from now.)
US is a ‘free’ and ‘liberal’ democracy, but a close inspection of the political process(which cannot be divorced from economic and media power) would indicate that the US is really an oligarchy. But in some ways, it is worse than the kind of oligarchy found in Latin American nations. After all, the European-descended elites in Latin America are not deified and ‘sacralized’; they are not beyond criticism and reproach. They remain in power because the brown populations tend to be rather hapless and pathetic, but it is fair game to speak truth to power in Latin America. It is fair to point out that the system isn’t particularly fair or just. The ruling elites, the oligarchs and barons of Latin America, don’t have a moral shield around them.
In contrast, the US is particularly in a precarious situation because the ruling elites, the Jews, have been ‘sacralized’ and near-defied as the Holy Holocaust people. Thus, any criticism of Jewish power(or even the mere notice of Jewish dominance and privilege) can lead to people being smeared and targeted as ‘antisemitic’ or ‘Neo-Nazi’. In this regard, the ruling elites of the US are more like the Kims of North Korea than the tycoons and overlords of Latin America. Indeed, Latin American elites often had to resort to brutal means to suppress dissent and the opposition precisely because they lacked a moral shield to mute criticism against them. In contrast, Jews merely need to use their media monopoly and control of deep state to say ‘Boo!’, and the uppity goyim who happened to displease the Jews, wittingly or not, are forced to grovel and beg forgiveness OR effectively excommunicated and exiled from institutions and industries that matter. What happened to the CNN newsman Rick Sanchez for having noticed Jewish domination of the media? He was blacklisted forever and finally got a gig at RT(Russia Today) because he’s been de-personed from the US media-scape. And what did Chris Christie, the fatso governor of New Jersey, do when he made a remark about the Occupied Territories in the presence of Sheldon Adelson, one of the great globo-Zionist barons of the GOP? It didn’t matter that Christie was praising Jews and Israel when he made the remark. The mere fact that he used the term ‘Occupied Territories’ displeased the Jews, and he was forced to grovel at the feet of a billionaire tycoon. Such behavior would be de rigeur in North Korea, but why do politicians act thus in the ‘liberal’ and ‘free’ United States?
Indeed, even whore politicians in Latin America don’t grovel at the feet of oligarchs in such manner. It’s easy to buy whore politicians in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, as most ‘democratic’ politicians are little more than paid-for-whores. In Kenya, many politicians belong in the pockets of Asian-Indian tycoons. Still, black whore-politicians in Kenya or other Africans don’t grovel before Indians or Chinese. Whore-politicians in Latin America ‘democracies’ will grab the money and do as told, but they don’t look upon their puppet-masters as god-men. It’s all about the money. In contrast, there is such a sickeningly servile deference among American politicians and managerial elites toward the Jewish overlords. It’s not just about the money but a quasi-spiritual fear-and-trembling before the Tribe as though Jews are truly holy and godlike. When Nancy Pelosi says the US will be standing right next to Israel even if the Congress building crumbles to the ground, it’s the sort of nutty sentiment one might expect from the servile dogs of North Korea. Jews are to the US what the Kims are to North Korea. They not only buy up whore-politicians but have the entire goy political(and economic) class looking up to Jews in the way that dogs look up to their masters.
This is truly a new development in American History. After all, even the Founding Fathers and Abraham Lincoln were not beyond criticism. Also, the Anglo-Americans or Wasps, the dominant elites throughout US history up to the end of the Cold War, were never objects of worship. They had much prestige and respect for their power and achievements, but they were not seen as god-men or holy people. They were often regarded with a critical eye, not least by their own kind who, if anything, encouraged more honest criticism of American Elite Power. In contrast, the current ruling elites of Jews are not to be criticized and exposed for what they are.
When humans are ‘sacralized’ and deified, the result is always a form of political nihilism. While we can conceive of a good or perfect god, it’d be foolish to entertain such notions about mankind because humans, neither as individuals nor groups, can be expected to be perfect or even all that good in the area of politics, which has always been a dirty and nasty business, at best a ‘necessary evil’. So, while people may worship whom they deem to be the perfect God, they would be crazy to revere a bunch of people as godlike or near-perfect. Such mind-set would willfully blind them to all the rottenness inherent in the object of their worship. Granted, it’s equally crazy to see only the bad about a certain group — as the Nazis were prone to do with Jews — , but the problem in the Current West is the mindless reverence of Jews that has made so many whites willfully blind to all the evils that Jews do. The psycho-political dynamics isn’t hardly different from what prevailed among Germans under National Socialism, Russians under Bolshevism, and Chinese under Maoism. As the personality cults of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, and Mao Zedong elevated them to demigod status, political morality became a matter of “our sacred leader, right or wrong”, or worse, “our sacred leader, right even when wrong” or “our sacred leader, always right, never wrong.” Thus, it didn’t matter what crazy policy the Great Leader pursued and how many lives were negatively affected; since the leaders were infallible and godlike, whatever they did had to have been good, beyond criticism and reproach, indeed worthy of celebration and praise to high heaven.
Now, one may argue that such cults existed under National Socialism and Communism because they were repressive or totalitarian tyrannies where power was concentrated in the iron fist of the regime. In contrast, liberal democracy, the political system that defines the West, is about free discourse, open criticism, and speaking truth to power. And yet, the deification of Jews(and along with them blacks and homos) indicates that the same dynamics can befall a so-called ‘free democracy’. Why would this be so? Because freedom doesn’t favor or guarantee freedom. If some people use their freedom to amass vast fortunes and attain near-monopolistic powers, they can buy up whore-politicians, gain control of media & academia, and gain dominance in finance. If such a people value their power above all else(even more than the principles of freedom and liberty), they will do whatever means at their disposal to chip away at the foundations of liberal democracy to better serve their tribal supremacism — consider what certain Italian-Americans in the Mafia did with freedom availed to them in the US; they didn't use freedom to serve freedom but used freedom to serve themselves at the expense of the Rule of Law and fair play.
Also, if extra-clever, they will use their power of media and academia to elevate themselves to holy sacred ‘victim group’ status, effectively transforming themselves into mini-jesuses. According to the Shoah Narrative, Six Million Jews Died for White Sins. Thus, Jews are like the Six-Million-Messiah-Men. Jews know that Jewish Supremacism alone will only lead to envy, resentment, fear, and anxiety. And so, they veil their supremacism with holy victimology, just like the Christian West masked so many of its horrors with the myth of the Son of God who died for the sins of mankind. That way, the West could conquer and pillage the world in the name of the Great Redeemer. Still, at least Christians didn’t make themselves into god-men. They were the first to admit that they themselves were not without sin and in need of atonement. In contrast, secular Jews have come to worship themselves as the rightful rulers of the world, and they shield their supremacism with the Anne Frank mask. With such a moral shield, Jews can pretty much do as they please and get away with it.
The nihilism at the center of American Politics is, in that regard, not all that different from the nihilism that defines the Kim Tyranny of North Korea. Even after Jews pushed the Great Replacement, Wars for Israel(that destroyed so many lives), White Death via Opioids, Wall Street robbery, pornification of society, desecration of marriage and Christianity with Globo-Homo-mania, vilification & dehumanization of whites, economic rape of Russia, the maniacal hate campaign against Iran, and the hoax about Russia Collusion, we still live in the same ole USA that sucks up to Jews as the holiest of the holy. Even after Jews dragged Donald Trump through the mud, the pathetic cuck-in-chief does little but praise and serve the Jews and Zionists. Even after Jews had Alex Jones deplatformed, the nutter blames the Chicoms and sucks up to Jews. Even after Jews have done everything to ruin Russia’s economy, Vladimir Putin goes the extra mile to support the Jewish community in Russia and to make nice with Netanyahu(despite Israel’s continued efforts to undermine Russia’s position in Syria). While Russia is relatively freer of Jewish Influence than the US is, it too is under the spell of Jewish Supremacist Power hiding behind the Anne Frank Mask.
Another thing that Jew-run US has in common with North Korea is the scapegoating of the foreigner and outsider. Now, all nations and groups indulge in this, and again, it is a matter of degrees. North Korea is extreme in blaming all its woes on outsiders. While nations like the US and groups like Jews have been especially instrumental in undermining the North Korean economy(along with those of Russia, Iran, Syria, and Venezuela), many of North Korea’s problems are self-made as the regime’s priority isn’t what is good for the nation but what is good for the Kim Clan. But as the Kim Clan is never self-critical and doesn’t allow domestic criticism of its power and policies, the blame must always fall on outsiders.
But we see a similar kind of mindset among Americans, especially ‘conservatives’ though increasingly among ‘liberals’ too — RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA! Why are American ‘conservatives’ so eager to blame America’s problems on foreigners and outsiders? It’s because Jews control the US and made it taboo for white ‘conservatives’ to blame anything on Jews, blacks, homos, and immigrants. (Notice that Jew-run Hollywood allows 'liberal' movies and TV shows where the villains are white American conservatives, but 'conservatives' movies and TV shows must always feature FOREIGN bad guys.) Indeed, American cuckservatives must chant the mantra of ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ or DIOS day in and day out. So, even though over 80% of Jews are Democratic and stridently push anti-white policies — and even though most Jewish ‘conservatives’ are neocons who care about Jewish Power & Israel and merely regard whites as their useful idiot dogs and cattle — , whites can’t say anything about Jews. Why, it’d be ‘antisemitic’, or heretical in the Current Year. Another group that causes tremendous problems in the US are blacks, the champions of criminality and thuggery. But as ‘racism’(a ‘sin’ that pertains mostly to attitudes about blacks) is also taboo, white ‘conservatives’ must keep mum about black problems. Even though over 90% of blacks vote Democratic, white ‘conservatives’ have little to say but 'We love blacks' and ‘Democrats are the real racists’. Cuckservatives say NOTHING of whites victimized by black brutality and merely bleat about how blacks are being done wrong by the Democrats. Supposedly, the reason for high rates of crime in cities like Detroit and Baltimore is because they are ‘socialist’ and run by Democrats. There was a time when Republicans used to make some noise about Family Values and at least stood up to the homo agenda. But once GOP became the party that begs for money from Casino moguls and Wall Street sharks, its morality went soulless libertarian and its revamped notion of ‘family values’ became ‘gay marriage is a conservative value’. Besides, as Jews are holy, whatever they demand must be holy too. Since holy Jews insisted, “Homos are our best buddies”, cuckservatives backed down from pushing back against globo-homo as well. It’s rather like North Koreans not being able to say anything negative or critical about the Kims, the tyrants of the nation. So, just like North Koreans must assuage their frustrations by blaming outsiders and foreigners, American ‘conservatives’ must channel their repressed fury at the Other. For John McCain and John Bolton, it was Evil Russia and Terrible Iran. Never mind Russia and Iran played no part in the demise of White America. If any group should be blamed, it should be Jews and soulless Wasps who pledged their loyalty to Jewish sharks. But no, Jews are holy, and white elites became worthless and craven toadies of Jews. As white goy elites couldn’t blame the domestic enemies & oppressors of the white race and as they didn’t feel like blaming themselves as hapless cucks of Jewish Power, they had to make do with barking at foreign enemies who always happened to be nations and groups either hated by Jews or green-lit by Jews for permissible hatred(as Jews would rather have Americans growl at the Other than at Jews). So, if one bunch of American ‘conservatives’ call for New Cold War with Russia, Russia, Russia, another bunch of American ‘conservatives’ try to blame it all on China. Bolton and McCain foamed at the mouth about Russia and Iran especially, and Donald Trump, Alex Jones, and Tucker Carlson blame most of America’s woes on China. In this, they are hardly better than the sad minions of North Korea who must suck up to the Kim Clan while mindlessly barking at any nation designated for hatred by the regime. Likewise, even though Jews pushed the Russia Collusion Hoax, brought about White Death via opioids, call for the Great Replacement, plan to seize guns, suppress free speech for nationalists, and dehumanize whites in popular culture, there are Jones, Trump, and Carlson praising Israel to high heaven while growling at China as the source of most of America’s problems. (In our crazy times, the very ‘liberals’ who denounce ‘racist, xenophobic, and Islamophobic conservatives’ for scapegoating the Other go out of their way to blame Russia, Russia, Russia for everything. These very ‘liberals’ who are so full of ‘tolerance’ and ‘empathy’ totally looked the other way while the Democrats spread wars and destruction to Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine. The truly sad thing is so many Americans are utterly unaware of their own hypocrisies.)
Another thing that North Korea and the US have in common is the exaggerated self-image. Now, this is far more comical with North Korea, a third-rate power saber-rattling its ramshackle nuclear program. Also, the Kim Clan is an object of ridicule all over the world, which makes it even funnier for North Korea propaganda to push the cult of personality of the fat loathsome Kim Jong-Un. In contrast, US is the lone superpower, and its might around the world is incontestable(if not invincible). Still, self-image is a relative matter. While a wealthy person has more justification to feel rich than a poor person(for whom such would be delusional and pathetic) does, a millionaire who feels himself a billionaire would also be a fool. Or a billionaire who considers himself a super-billionaire would also be deluded. Worse, if a rich person thinks himself a GOOD person simply because he surrounded himself with yes-men who sing his praises, he would be an idiot. Consider Michael Bloomberg who conflated his vast riches with political prestige and moral legitimacy, only to discover that people saw him for what he is: An unscrupulous oligarch trying to buy himself the presidency.
In a similar vein, while the US is truly the lone superpower, its self-delusions are now downright laughable. According to current American Mythos, the US is an ‘exceptional’ nation, the beacon of freedom, liberty, and human rights around the world. This from a nation that has pornification for pop culture, where 100,000s of people were allowed to die of drug overdose without any concern from elites, where the borders are all but broken, where the elites & ‘sophisticated’ urban dwellers worship globo-homo-mania as the new religion, where antifa thugs are allowed to run riot & randomly attack law-abiding people, where the ideology is policed by green-haired wenches with tattoos & trinkets through their noses, where the tiny Jewish minority controls nearly all media & internet, where the Deep State can get away with a criminal coup attempt against the president, where the foreign policy consists of destroying any nation hated by Jewish Supremacists, and etc. After what the US has done to Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Ukraine, where do these American goons get the idea that the US is a force for good around the world? And where is the Rule of Law when just about the only law that seems to matter is “Is it good for Jews?” Where is human rights in a nation where bakers are destroyed because they won’t make ‘gay wedding cakes’? And what kind of a sane nation conflates marriage with homo fecal penetration and tranny-penis-cutting? What kind of conservative movement has ‘Lady Maga’ for its mascot?
America is rich and powerful, and it will be dominant for the foreseeable future, but its prestige as a world power is a joke. No one respects or trusts America. All nations fear America like people fear gangsters, but there is no real respect. Also, even though most nations dare not say so publicly, they know that US is ruled by the Jewish Cabal, and they look upon White Managerial elites as little more than running dogs of the Jews. White goy elites are to Jews what Japan is to the US. Japan is a whore-geisha to the American Empire, and white goyim are now errand-boys to the Jewish masters. It’s no wonder the likes of John Bolton and John McCain were so eager to act TOUGH. Deep down inside, they know that everyone around the world knows they’re nothing but dogs of their Jewish Masters. Listening to the likes of Bolton, McCain, and Romney is rather like listening to the Kim regime’s minions. And even though Trump made himself out to be a different kind of candidate in 2016, as president he's been the same old same old. A mere dog of Jews. And Trump’s barking at Iran, Venezuela, and China makes him seem tough only to idiot MAGA ‘conservatives’. For much of the world, Trump’s tirades against foreign nations is really a sign of his weakness. After all, his main tormentors have been Jews and the Deep State. It wasn’t Iran that pushed Russia Collusion Hoax. It wasn’t China that got him impeached over Ukraine. It was the Jews, and if Trump were truly tough, he would have taken them on. But he is surrounded by Jewish handlers, and he knows full well that GOP is controlled and owned by the likes of Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer, both globo-homo neocon scum. Jews kick his ass, but he kisses Jewish ass. He’s so weak where it really counts, and so, to burnish his credentials as a Tough Guy, he makes a lot of stupid noises about China and Iran especially and to a lesser extent Venezuela.
But where the US is most like North Korea is in the infantilization of ideology into ‘idology’. Any tyrannical regime fears free thought and free speech above all else. After all, free-thinking people with right of free speech will speak truth to power. They will use reason and facts to expose the problems of the nation under current rulership. Naturally, tyrannical regimes prefer dogma to free thought because dogma is about training minds to believe without thinking. Still, even dogma can be problematic to a regime because it comes with a set of principles and inner logic. For example, communism is about equality and dictatorship of the proletariat. As such, a highly unequal nation that calls itself communist will have many citizens wondering about the contrast between what the official ideology proclaims and what the reality reveals. Therefore, what is most useful to the ruling elites is a mindless worship of certain groups, symbols, and idols/icons as holy, sacred, fantastic, awesome, and super. We see this in the cult of personality around celebrities. The fans just adore the star because he or she is their idol. It didn’t matter that Michael Jackson was surrounded by controversy after controversy. For his many fans, he could do no wrong because... he was Michael Jackson. And even when it was plain as day that Elvis Presley was ruining his health and sanity with drugs, his fans revered him to the day he died, and there have been so many Elvis Impersonators. Bruce Lee met a sordid death with adultery and drugs, but to his legions of fans he is the immortal kung fu master. To the very end of his life, Adolf Hitler was served by Germans who were willing to go to hell and back for the Fuhrer. Unlike ideology, ‘idology’ is truly mindless. It’s an emotional and ‘spiritual’ quality, an intensely primal and subliminal attachment to something or someone as near-sacred.
Over the years, North Korea gave up on all pretenses of ideological principles. The only thing that came to matter was the power of the Kim clan. If Stalin and Mao were still sufficiently ideological not to hand over power to family members, the Kims turned communism into a family affair. Indeed, that is what North Korea is about. It’s not about ideology or nationalism but about Kim dynasticism. To perpetuate this, North Korean political culture got even dumber over the years. If in the past the Kims were revered as the ideal practitioners of Marxism-Leninism with a Korean accent, they are now obeyed and worshiped simply because they’re the Kims.
And yet, we see parallels in the US under Jewish Supremacist rule. If in the past, Jews associated themselves with certain ideologies or principles — socialism, communism, anarchism, libertarianism, free speech absolutism, universal human rights, and etc. — , they are now all about Jews, Jews, Jews. What are all those AIPAC rallies about but OBEY THE JEWS BECAUSE JEWS ARE JEWS AND JEWS ARE HOLY? And why should we hate Russia? Because holy Jews hate Russia. If Jews are holy and if holy Jews hate Russia, it must be holy to hate Russia. Why should we hate Iran? Because holy Jews hate Iran. If Jews are holy and if holy Jews hate Iran, it must be holy to hate Iran. It no longer matters what Jews stand for in terms of ideology. The only thing that matters the idolatry of Jews as Jews. So, even as American ‘conservatives’ claim to oppose liberalism, they suck up to Jewish Liberals. And even as American ‘liberals’ claim to loathe conservatism, they suck up to Jewish Neocons. Jews are holy regardless of party affiliations. We must all serve the Jews. The likes of Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden may say shit about Trump and other such goyim, but they don’t have a negative word for the likes of Sheldon Adelson, just like the likes of Mitt Romney and John Bolton don’t have a bad word for the likes of George Soros. Jews can be ‘left’, ‘right’, ‘Zionist’, or ‘socialist’. It doesn’t matter. What matters is they are Jewish, and that means they are the ‘made men’ of American Power. And as the favored allies of Jews, homos have the same privileges. There used to be some rational argument for ‘gay rights’, but no longer. Now, it’s more like the ‘gay religion’ or ‘gay rites’. We must worship Globo-Homo or Queertianity. Why, look at all those churches with ‘gay’ flags! (Why don’t churches fly the Palestinian flag to show solidarity with the victims of tribal-supremacist Zionism? It goes to show that American Christianity, 'mainline' or 'Evangelical', are mere tools of the Jews. Mainline churches worship globo-homo, the proxy of Jewish Power, and Evangelicals zealously support Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, even Christian ones.) Also, to make sure that Americans grow up worshiping globo-homo, the homo propaganda is pushed full swing onto kids from the youngest age possible. Libraries and schools push for sessions where trannies read to little children. As kids will believe in Santa and the Tooth Fairy, why not get them while they’re young?
Any society that respects reason and facts will not push politics onto kids who are too young for critical thinking. But Jew-run US is all about total mind-control over goyim, and that means indoctrinating and inculcating young ones as soon as possible. It also means the infantilization of adults so that they will respond more with emotions and sensations than intellect and thought. Ideally, adults should take a deep breath, listen to all sides, and critically draw conclusions. But if they did that, they might actually see the Power for what it is and speak truth to power. So, it’s more useful to keep them in an emotional than rational state. That way, they can be manipulated by sounds and images of the Jew-run mass media without their minds serving as a critical shield. There was a time when Jews used to denounce such tactics as ‘fascist’ and ‘irrational’. Back then, Jews argued that, whereas socialism and liberalism were rationalist or scientific, fascism was grounded in the irrational, sensual, and atavistic. After all, what mattered most in National Socialist Germany was not any consistent set of ideological principles but the sense that FUHRER KNOWS BEST. But that was then, this is now. With near-total monopoly of mass media, entertainment, advertising, deep state propaganda, and finance, Jews are now in the position to control all images and sounds. So, just by associating homosexuality with the ‘rainbow’ and spreading the 'iconic' image far and wide, Jews managed to persuade so many infantilized Americans that ‘gay’ is not only the New Normal but the New Sacred. With endless conflation of US flag with the Israeli flag at political rallies and news propaganda, Jews have convinced countless Americans that Zionism is as American as Apple Pie. The globo-homo pageantry in the US is not unlike the obnoxious parades in North Korea. They are both devised to override reason & mind and overwhelm people with the sheer power of spectacle, what Chris Hedges calls the Empire of Illusion(though he too is under the globo-homo and Sacred Negro spell).
It is for this reason that Americans need to stop taking things for granted. It’s true that there’s a lot of freedom in the US, and this freedom can be used for much good. But the fact is Jews used their own freedom, intelligence, cunning, and tribal supremacism to create a new order that, day in and day out, chips away at American freedoms, liberty, faculties of reason & thought, and virtues of honesty, courage, & integrity. Just like the Nazis used democratic freedoms to gain power only to do away with democracy, Jews have used freedom to gain power to undo the freedom of the goyim. One saving grace of the Nazis was they were, sooner than later, honest about what their goals were. It wasn’t long before Hitler sneered at democracy and ruled as supremacist fuhrer.
In contrast, Jews are far more insidious because they mean to do away with democracy and reduce American goyim to the status of Palestinians in the West Bank. Unlike honest Nazis who had no use for Free Speech, Jews fool people with mendacity such as “We believe in free speech but not hate speech”, with ‘hate’ to be determined by Jewish groups. In other words, Zionism that destroyed the Palestinians isn’t ‘hate speech’. Jewish agenda of the Great Replacement and White Nakba isn’t ‘hate speech’. However, white people who want to preserve the geographic and demographic integrity of their nations must be shut down for ‘hate speech’. Jewish hatred against Russia, Iran, Palestinians, and white Christians isn’t ‘hate’, but anyone who notices and calls out Jewish Power for what it is is deemed as ‘hateful’ and must be shut down.
And Jews will say they don’t want to take away our guns. Oh no, we can keep guns to hunt for ducks and deer. We only need to hand over guns that are designed to fight tyranny. Now, was the Second Amendment about hunting ducks and squirrels? Or was it about the right to bear arms to protect oneself and one’s loved ones from tyranny? By letting people own guns meant to shoot ducks but taking away guns meant to fight tyranny, Jews pretend they respect the Second Amendment. Only dummies would trust such weasels. US is still a democracy that is far far freer than North Korea, but under Jewish Supremacist control, freedom and liberty are being chipped away for white goyim on a daily basis. White people need to wake up. If the fate of White America is the Californization of America, then the fate of whites will be worse than North Korea. Cult of Personality is bad enough, but the Cult of Ethnicity(around Jews) is downright deadly. After all, even the biggest tyrants eventually die, but a Tribe can stick around forever. Jews are not gods.
Some on the Alt Right do raise alarm about Brown Violence, but 'Latino' crime isn't their main worry. They believe that, even if all browns are good people, the demographic transformation will profoundly alter the national character of America. Also, even if most browns are rather nice and make okay neighbors, they supply votes for the globalist elites who, ensconced in power, wage more wars abroad, promote cultural decadence as the New Normal, and push economic policies that concentrate more power at the top. The effect of immigration in CA has been a one-party dictatorship with the biggest socio-economic inequalities and PC lunacy, especially when it comes to issues of 'gender'.
After all, Alt Right doesn't believe Asians are criminals or terrorists but opposes Asian immigration too because, again, Too Many Asians alter the national character of America. Also, given that Asians tend to be servile to the Existing Power and obsessed with status, they are likely to become the managerial class for globalism, like Francis Fukuyama, Amy Chua, Nikki Haley, John Yoo, Sarah Jeong, etc. The result will be Jewish globalists lording over Asian upper-middle class as commissars over the white masses.
Trump's alarmist rhetoric about Mexican criminals and Muslim terrorists actually appealed more to Normie Conservatives. But then, Trump didn't start this rhetoric. Hollywood has been making lots of movies featuring Muslims as terrorists. The SICARIO sequel begins with Muslims crossing the US-Mexican border and blowing up US shopping malls. In the 90s, the movie villains were usually South African 'racists' or Muslim Terrorists. And who can forget RULES OF ENGAGEMENT that is downright genocidal in its message toward Muslims over there. KILL THEM ALL. Even before 9/11, many white working class kids grew up watching Hollywood movies with evil Muslim villains. So, when they entered the military, they were more than happy to go over there and kill them 'savages'.
While some in the Alt Right like to pass around the Muslim Terrorist and Mexican Gang meme, this is much more the feature of Alt Light and God-and-Country Conservatism. The anti-Muslim stuff is actually a way to gain sympathy from Jews(and homos), i.e. Jews and homos(and even feminists) should side with the Right because Liberals don't care about Muslims who want to wipe Israel off the map, enslave women, and throw homos from roofs. Alt Right cares far less about this line of argument because it cares far less about forging alliance with Jews, homos, and feminists. Alt Right's position on Israel is 'none of our business'. Some in the Alt Right cheer for Palestinians just to 'return the favor'. Also, Alt Right believes that Jewish power and influence in US and EU are so baleful that alliance is near-impossible. And Alt Right thinks feminism is terrible and rejects the homo agenda. It is the Alt Light and 'cuck' Right that go for the "Liberals are the true anti-Semites, Homophobes, and misogynists because they don't condemn Muslims" polemic.
Also, even though Alt Rightists are aware of Muslim Terrorism(esp in Europe), most trace the problem between the West and Muslim World to Western invasion of Middle East & North AFrica(that angered and radicalized Muslims) and immigration policy controlled by Jews and globalists(that let in millions of Muslims into the West). So, while the Alt Light and Normie Cons tend to blame Muslims, Alt Right is more likely to blame the People behind the Invade/Invite Strategy that turned the Middle East and North Africa upside down and then 'welcomed' all the refugees and other riff-raff(pretending to be 'refugees') into the West. While Alt Right has its share of bozos and morons, its overall understanding of foreign policy tends to be more sophisticated than that of the Alt Light and Normie Conservatives who are stuck in 'Liberals are the real racist' mentality. Alt Right's view of foreign affairs is probably closer to that of the Saker or Paul Craig Roberts even though neither is part of Alt Right.
In Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson, we do see some Alt Right influence on their views of foreign policy... though, to be sure, one could trace their change of views to Paleo-Conservatism as well(of Pat Buchanan and Paul Gottfried) or Libertarianism(of Ron Paul). Both Tucker Carlson and Ann Coulter waved the red, white, and blue during the Iraq War. Coulter's warmongering fever was so out-of-control and hyperbolic -- turn them 'muzzies' into Christians -- that National Review let her go. It was the hope during the Bush II years that, if the American 'Right' does something spectacular in the Middle East and remakes the whole region into an oasis in which Israel will especially be safe, the American Jewish power will move over to the GOP. Never let a crisis go to waste, and 9/11 offered an opportunity for GOP Wasps(fast losing power) to make a move to recruit Jewish Power by doing the bidding of Neocons as middlemen power-brokers between GOP wasps and the larger Jewish Community. The idea seemed so tantalizing that even NYT and Liberal Zionist Media came to support the Iraq War based on WMD hoax. (The massive protests against the war probably had more to do with the trepidation that it might indeed be a great success and lend credibility to the GOP-Neocon Right.) But the whole thing blew up spectacularly, and Bush II ended his presidency as one of the worst presidents ever. The economy also collapsed. Still, the fact is the GOP and people like Coulter had tried so very hard to do whatever to win over the Jews. But most Jews went for Obama. Worse, feeling that the GOP as the white party was dead forever, Jewish Liberals(and even Neocons) began to show their true face and spew anti-white vitriol not unlike Tim Wise. The OBAMA CONQUEST Newsweek cover said it all. While 'cuck'-servatives remained timid and servile, figures like Ann Coulter just about had enough. Even though she has always known that most Jews were on the 'left', she had no idea how much the great majority of the Jewish community really hated, hated, and hated the white goy majority. The anti-white rhetoric became ever more strident and boastful with sadistic glee at the prospect of White America's demise. Jews, who'd been demanding that whites respect Jewish identity and support Israel, were gloating not only about the fall of White America but, incredibly, even the Islamo-Africanization of Europe, the ancient homeland of Europeans.
Though neither Coulter or Carlson is Alt Right, their main concern was demography, not crime or terrorism. Sure, because it's deemed 'racist' to defend the preservation of White America, people like Coulter and Carlson will tend to mention issues pertaining to social/economic costs of immigration, but their main worry is End of White America. They can't and won't say it(though Coulter flirts with outright racial consciousness), but it is where their views intersect with the Alt Right. Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson say it has nothing to do with color of the skin and only with values -- the problem is not the race of the newcomers but the values they bring with them -- , but Alt Right disagrees. Alt Right and Jared Taylor(not quite Alt Right) have an emotional or near-spiritual attachment to White/Western Civilization. Alt Right tends to see Jews as the Other, whereas Taylor wishes for Jews to be partners, but for them, Western Civilization isn't merely about moral values and monetary value but about genetics and aesthetics: Western culture is an expression of European blood in both spirit and form. So, Western music is an expression of the white soul, and Western art depict the unique beauty of the white race. It's not just about what's in the head but what's in the heart, face, body. This is why Faith Goldy opposes Asian immigration in Canada. Most Asians are not criminals. Many study and work hard and contribute to the Canadian economy. And because most Asians(especially from East Asia) tend to be bland and servile, they readily soak up the latest PC fashions in 'Western Values'. They assimilate all-too-well to current fads and fashions of the West. But, they are still racially different, and too many of them will permanently alter the European character of Canada.
Now, some white people don't care about such things. They either see all peoples as just individuals/economic units OR believe that whites are so uniquely guilty of historical 'sins' that their nations deserved to be taken over by non-whites. (As for white elites, they figure their vaunted positions are secure and that newcomers will mainly serve them. Their main identity is 'elite' or 'privilege', not white. And, their idea of fighting 'white privilege' is not surrendering their own privilege but beating up on un-privileged whites as 'racist' for not being properly welcoming of mass-immigration to replace the white population and loyally serve the 'progressive' white elites.) Anyway, while one can argue with Alt Right ideas, one cannot argue with Alt Right passions. Ideas exist in the mind, passion exists in the heart. It's like reason is a mind-thing, whereas religion is a faith-thing. Even though Alt Right is essentially a secular movement, it has 'faith' and soulful passion for European identity. It's the same with Zionists, even secular ones. They can argue and debate about ideas and values, but the notion of Israel as a Jewish state is 'sacred' to them, a historical covenant. It's a matter of the heart. It is non-negotiable. It is like a mother to them. Not for debate, not for sale, not for compromise. Israel MUST be a Jewish State to them.
Now, in some ways, the debacle at Charlottesville wasn't really unique. There was extreme violence in Berkeley(or was it UCLA?) when Milo was scheduled to speak. The violence was comparable to what happened in Charlottesville. And it took heavy police presence to allow Ben Shapiro -- an ardent Zionist enemy of Alt Right -- to speak at one of his college events. Even Charles Murray was attacked by a college mob.
If Charlottesville got more attention, it was because the Alt Right guys were bolder and cockier. Gentlemen like Charles Murray seemed confused and flustered like Mr. MaGoo. Milo's speech was scrapped. Ann Coulter also canceled her speech soon thereafter. And many college professors self-censor themselves out of fear of the NPC mob. Steven Salaita was fired from U of I for expressing rage about Israel's attack on Gaza. Norman Finkelstein's career at Depaul was derailed by Dershowitz and gang. And recently, a Palestinian-American female teacher was fired because she wouldn't sign an anti-BDS pledge. (It almost seems as though what Jews did to Palestinians was dress rehearsal for what they are doing to white people. But white cucks go out of their way to suck up to Jewish Supremacist Power. White Nakba is happening all over, but these white cucks suck up to Jewish Power that does to whites in Texas what Israel does to Palestinians in the West Bank. The cucks must really be well-paid, or maybe they are so dumb blind as born-again Evangelicals that they regard Jews as holy Chosenites no matter how many times Jews shit on them. They are like dogs that serve the master after being kicked over and over. Consider how the Jewish media raked John McCain over the coals in 2008, but he spent his remaining years doing nothing but serving Jews, Jews, Jews.)
Now, a worthless idiot like George Hawley, the so-called scholar of the Alt Right, will say all sorts of nasty things about 'white supremacism' and 'racism' but will not say ANYTHING about Jewish power and its abuses or how homo supremacist activists have destroyed lives and careers all across America. So, what happened to Alt Right guys at Charlottesville was part of a pattern, except that the hammer came down much harder because Alt Right didn't back down as it burst on the scene. So, the only way to deal with the movement was to smash it like God destroyed the Tower of Babel. Especially because Populist Trump was seen as the bold unapologetic candidate who rode to victory on the Alt Right magic carpet, the Power decided to use Charlottesville as an opportunity to wipe the Alt Right off the political map. So, the Constitutional Rights of free assembly and free speech were denied by the powers-that-be in full collusion with the corrupt media.
That said, the Unite the Right was a moral disaster as well. Spencer, filled with vanity as edge-lord 007 enfant-terrible hero, allied with some really loathsome characters. Many of us didn't know then, but we know now. Chris Cantwell the Cantaloupe-Head is a deranged 14/88 clown. And Fat Matt Heimbach turned out to be not only a neo-nazi idiot but a perfect Jerry-Springer-show guest: "I fuc*ed my father-in-law's wife." The fact that Spencer allied with such idiots meant his brand of Alt Right, which got the most media attention, was scraping the bottom of the barrel than patiently building a new political and intellectual base. Ramzpaul saw the writing on the wall earlier at Hail-Gate(or Heil-Gate) when Spencer foolishly emboldened some of his minions to give the Hitler Salute. It's likely that Spencer didn't foresee the reaction, but it was an embarrassing moment for not only people like Ramzpaul and Jared Taylor but for Donald Trump and Steven Bannon. Being edgy is one thing, Nazi crap is another. The whole point of the Alt Right was to find a new path away from both Neoconservatism and KKK craziness, but Spencer the edge-lord, eager for bad boy notoriety, just couldn't help himself. Not long after 'Heil-Gate', he was speaking seriously with Andrew Anglin. And it now seems his group was operating more in the manner of ANIMAL HOUSE or STRIPES than TAPS. (The misguided boys in TAPS fail, but they did put up a serious resistance.)
That said, despite the unsavory character of some of the scheduled speakers at the Unite the Right rally, the fact is the fiasco was almost entirely due to the Jewish mayor and black police chief who shut down the event and pushed the UTR attendees into a gang of Antifa goons who were let alone to tear the city apart. So, if Spencer and others had really been smart, they would have done everything to shape the narrative. With cheap video technology, they could have made their own documentary on the subject. But all that opportunity was lost. As the story of Jesus shows, even defeat can be spun into victory. It all depends on who does the storytelling. Kubrick was half-wrong about SCHINDLER'S LIST when he said Holocaust was about failure whereas Spielberg's movie is about success. True, the Holocaust was a tragic failure for Jews who were killed, but the Holocaust Narrative was a success that 'sacralized' Jewish victims while burdening Germans(and other Northern European racial cousins of Germans) with the Burden of Guilt forever. In the end, the story of the event matters more than the event itself.
But for the most part, Spencer and others did little to shape the post-Charlottesville narrative. ONLY NOW, Spencer the fool is trying to run with the Charlottesville-as-moral-victory narrative. After Charlottesville, most Alt Right people were not deplatformed. It was Daily Stormer and few other sites. Spencer and his cohorts had many months to come up with their own narrative and hammer it home over and over. But they dropped the ball and focused on other matters.
This is all too bad because if the Alt Right had remained more in the mode of Ramzpaul and Jared Taylor, it could have done so much more. After all, Ramzpaul(who has one foot in edgy politics and the other in Normie culture) and Ann Coulter/Tucker Carlson came to more-or-less same conclusion on the JQ though Coulter and Carlson can't spell it out. Coulter feels betrayed not only by the Jewish community but by Neocons whom she had loyally served for so many yrs. She feels abused, like a sex slave. She feels that her kind did everything to wave the Israeli flag, vilify the enemies of Israel, and love Jews. Like John McCain, she growled at whatever Jews hated. But in recent yrs, she has stopped barking at Iran, Russia, Syria, Palestinians, and etc.
Despite all that Coulter & co. had done over the years for Zionism and Jewish Prestige, what did Jewish Power finally give to America? Obama, Homomania, and endless push for Diversity to replace whites. Worse, it wasn't just New York Times and CNN but Neocons and National Review as well. Even Neo-'conservatives' blasted Trump and called for white replacement. Coulter came to see Neocons as weasels and came to see most of GOP as spineless 'paycheck conservatives' who only do the bidding of oligarchs: Paul Ryan and etc. And that is why she was so invested in Trump, the only candidate who denounced foreign wars, the need for walls, and immigration reform. And he was the only GOP candidate who openly supported European nationalists and bemoaned Merkel's decision to open the gates.
So, there was a chance of greater convergence between some in the Conservatism Inc. and the Alt Right. But Spencer, too full of himself, decided to play politics like Mission Impossible. If he really wanted to be bold, he should have written a book on political philosophy than hold quasi-Nazi tiki-torch marches and make common cause with a psychopath like Cantwell and moron like Heimbach. As for guys like Mike Enoch, they have value as 'shitlords' targeting PC shibboleths on podcasts; they have no value as leaders. It's like Howard Stern and Steve Dahl can make it as shockjocks but can't be taken seriously as anything else. But somehow, Enoch took leadership position. Nazi larping can be ironic in a podcast, not in the streets when crowds gather in earnest to make a political statement. Give a nazi salute in that context, and it's a political expression, not a joke or prank.
As for people in Silicon Valley or other super-rich cities, they may not live in Gated Communities, but it's safe to say that much of the area is like an Extensive Gated Community or Gated City(or Golden Gated City). The houses are not gated like rich homes in South Africa or Venezuela, but there are social and class barriers demarcating the super rich from the very rich from the rich from the middle and the rest. It's like there is no gate around Hyde Park community in Chicago, but it is among the safest because most professors and students are white or Asian and also because there is super-heavy police presence to suppress black crime. Also, home prices make it impossible for most blacks to live within the community.
Still, because there are no actual walls or gates to protect the rich from the hordes, it's true enough that many affluent people may feel that all-is-well in America. Since they are 'good' and 'intelligent' people who've made it, everyone else who didn't make it must be lazy or stupid. And yet, there is a contradiction in their attitude because, while they dismiss the problems of the white working class and underclass as products of their own failing, they employ PC rhetoric to gush about all those poor immigrants who must be given a chance. But if white losers have no one to blame but themselves, then aren't non-white losers around the world also responsible for their own problems? Aren't the brown losers in Mexico and Guatemala merely the 'Latino' counterparts of white losers in the US? Apparently not according to elite PC attitudes. While white working class and middle class(continually sinking) that voted for Trump are reviled and ridiculed as 'populist losers', the endless hordes of browns who want to break into America are romanticized as 'dreamers'. Rich whites look down on whites who have less but idealize browns who have less. Instead of trying to boost the livelihoods of whites who have less, they focus on 'saving' the browns who want to start anew in America. Now, many rich whites didn't feel this way in the past, so maybe it has something to do with who controls the media/academia. Or, maybe it's just the sense among the rich that the poor immigrants are motivated to work harder(more compliant, less complaint) than working class whites who are now either too demanding or even downright degenerate. (The utter vulgarization of the white middle class and working class culture cheapened their moral capital. Tom Joad vs Jim Goad. One is a noble character, a champion of the meek and down-and-out, the other is a real-life punk personality who's wallowed in depravity all his life. When the image of the working-class becomes Jerry-Springered and Jim-Goaded, it loses moral capital. Jim Goad is an interesting writer and a courageous enemy against PC, but what is he FOR? Freedom to do what? To act and talk like utter shit. Not that the elite image has been so great either, what with their mindless worship of anything homo and tranny. And given the vulgarization of Jewish Culture -- Harvey Weinstein and Amy Schumer -- , American Image has become sick and demented from top to bottom. And one of the problems of Trump is that he makes an odd hero of the people given his rather sordid life story of never-ending self-indulgence.)
But then, there was also a contradiction within the Alt Right of Richard Spencer(who pretty much came to own the label after 'Heil-Gate'). He grabbed it as MY TOY! Given the class split between white elites and white middle class/working class, the most natural priority for the Alt Right would have been to reach out to whites who feel stranded without leadership. This would have called for patient grass-roots activism. But Spencer, a spoiled boy of privilege, has a knee-jerk revulsion of the hoi polloi. His idea of white power is all about white elitism. He is fixated on personal power. His supremacism is more of the Anglo-Imperialist brand of Rudyard Kipling -- White Man's Destiny and Burden -- than that of Nazis, but his head is so up in the clouds with dreams of power and glory that he is bored by real problems of the white masses who feel left out. They didn't read Nietzsche and don't understand the true philosophy of 007.
Indeed, Spencer's real problem with the current elites is not their hyper-elitism or super-privilege per se but that they are not his kind of people. Similarly, his problem with globalist neo-imperialism is not that it is globalist or imperialist but that it is controlled by Jews. His dream is not to end imperialism in favor of nationalism but to practice an even grander imperialism ruled by Anglos as the Faustian Race or something. Because Spencer's mindset and outlook are so narcissistic and stuck-up, he's been incapable of shaping the Alt Right into a movement that could actually mean something to masses of whites who feel like a body without a head. So, the burden of Alt Right grassroots fell to someone like Matt Heimbach the dummy whose idea of mass politics is swilling endless cases of beer, wearing a Nazi helmet, and bumbling around with his bubble-butt.
If the problem of Paleo-Conservatism was it was filled with too many old people, the problem of Alt Right has been its youth. Youth is full of energy and optimism, but it's also rash and impulsive. So, just like 60s Yippies and Black Panthers wasted their political capital on stupid shit, so did the members of the Alt Right. In a way, the failures of both the New Left and New Right were similar in kind. The New Left, liberated from the 'stalinism' of the Old Left, turned to sex, drugs, and rock-n-roll. It burned out. (The members of the Left that did gain power tended to be humorless in their long march through the institutions. But did they really win? By the time they were in positions of power, communism/socialism had failed, Democratic Party had gone over to the ultra-rich oligarchs, and military-industrial-complex was stronger than ever. So, all they could do was compromise with the ultra-capitalists and settle for Homomania. It was just 'subversive' enough for radical vanity and sufficiently useful to the Rich Class that had no more use for politics of class struggle.)
The new movement of the Alt Right, liberated from the organizational strictures of Conservatism Inc or grim humorlessness of White Nationalism 1.0, rushed into action like kids into summer break on the last day of school. It had energy but no organization, discipline, or hierarchy. Just like Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Bill Ayers, and rest of them were not exactly Lenin, Trotsky, or Stalin, the leaders of the Alt Right weren't exactly the Founding Fathers or even the National Socialists(who were pathological but had remarkable strategic sense). And Spencer, a spoiled rich kid who was showered with affection and all-the-toys from childhood, had this magical Harry-Potter mentality that wishes would turn into reality with the power of his Faustian will.
