To Combat Globalism, Whites in the West Must Restore their Own Nationalism, Not Attack Chinese(and Russian) Nationalism — Globalism Is Essentially a Jewish Creation and Tool, and Jews Suppress White Identity Necessary for White National Liberation in the West

https://vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-globalization-meant-sinification-until-china-virus-intervened

Using the Covid-29 crisis to push nationalism against globalism is good and sound.

Oddly enough however, so-called nationalists in the West are attacking Chinese Nationalism. But if Chinese being nationalist is wrong, it then follows that nationalism itself is wrong. And that means West shouldn't be nationalist like China(and Russia)... which is self-defeating to nationalists.

China used globalism for nationalist purposes. It believes in China First.
And Western nations should use the World Order for their own national interests.
But when people in the West attack Chinese nationalism, they are attacking nationalism itself. It's like Tucker Carlson denouncing China for being 'ethno-nationalist'. Funny coming from someone who opposes immigration on grounds that all of US will turn into California. (But his confused or hypocritical self is full of praise for Zionist ethno-imperialism.)

Russia has shown that a nation can be nationalist and work with China. China has never been opposed to other nations being nationalist. China and Russia get along despite tensions(historical and geopolitical) because both understand and respect each other: Russia uses the alliance for Russian interests, China uses the alliance for Chinese interests. Russia is okay with Chinese nationalism, China is okay with Russian nationalism... as long as neither goes imperialist on the other.

So, why not follow the Russian model? What does Russia do? It pursues Russian nationalism without denouncing Chinese nationalism. That way, Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism can co-exist side by side. They can hammer out differences and compromise on certain matters on basis of mutual understanding.

The problem isn't Chinese nationalism or even Chinese globalism. Pakistan and Iran are far less rich and powerful than the US, but they maintain their sovereignty vis-a-vis China. They trade and cooperate on certain interests without surrendering their power to China. Even impoverished North Korea(with 1/40th of the economy of South Korea) has managed to do its own thing in defiance of China.

But we are to believe that the rich and mighty West has been helpless to stop Chinese power and influence? ROTFL. True, Chinese business interests have moved aggressively into Canada and Australia, but whose fault is that? Anglos turned into a bunch of worthless cucks who measure everything in terms of money and 'woke' virtue-signaling about 'muh diversity'.
What did Sun Tzu say in the Art of War? Power is like water. It generally runs into open spaces. So, when Anglo nations went cucky-wuck and opened themselves to Chinese people and money, guess where a lot of people and money went? China didn't forcibly invade the West(like the West once did against China). Rather, Canada and Australia freely opened themselves up to Chinese people and money(as well as to Hindus, Arabs, and even thuggish Sudanese blacks).

But why did Anglos go from proudly race-ist and nationalist — Canada and Australia used to have WHITE ONLY immigration policies — to globalist, 'anti-racist', cucky-wuck, and pro-diversity? Why did Anglos allow Africans and Muslims to take over entire parts of London? Because Mao sent his Red Guard hordes to conquer them? Because Jackie China and Bruce Lee's ghost led an army of kung fu warriors to invade the West? No, because Anglos let Jews take over the West, and Jew filled white minds with 'white guilt', jungle fever, self-loathing, diversity-mania, and 'muh restaurant' lunacy.

Jews made Anglos cuck to the Other(the Primary Other being Jews of course). Once Anglos got into the habit of cucking to Jews, it was only a matter of time before other groups followed the Jewish Lead: Chinese, Hindus, Arab Sheiks, illegals from Latin America, the African invasion, etc. They all learned to chant 'diversity' and 'racism' to gain increased entry into the rich and clean West. And as white minds were colonized by Jewish PC, whites just nodded along. Keep in mind that until Donald Trump came along, 'nationalism' was a dirty word among nearly all Western elites, intellectuals, journalists, and managerial class.

Russia showed what a nation can do. Russia partly regained national sovereignty from Jewish globalist oligarchs. It has operated on basis of nationalism(relative to the rest of Europe) since. So, when it deals with China, it is on the basis of Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism respecting each other. Russia doesn't have to vilify China, and China doesn't have to vilify Russia.

But US, Canada, UK, and Australia are without Anglo sovereignty. Anglos(like Derbyshire himself) are sorry cucks to Jewish Globalists. If Anglos had sense, they wouldn't opt for anti-Sinicism. Rather, they would argue that white nations must be like China, Russia, and Iran in regaining national sovereignty and operating on the basis of national interest. This can be done without anti-Chinese rhetoric as Russia proved. Initially, China respected Trump as a tough-talking nationalist. Chinese nationalism can work with other nationalisms. Alas, Trump turned into just a cuck to Jews who talks nationalism but engages in continued US globo-homo hegemonism and imperialism. (Also, as Deep State operatives are addicted to the hyper-power game of globalist-imperialism, they despise nationalism as 'small potatoes'. For them, the only game that matters is the globalist contest of world domination. So, instead of envisioning a future where American Nationalism and Chinese Nationalism co-exist peacefully, they can only think in terms of American globalist supremacism vs Chinese globalist supremacism. They project their own supremacism onto others. It's like Jews project all their pathology onto Russia. The difference is China wants to trade with the world but has no interest in spreading 'Chinese values' or 'Chinese ideology', whereas American missionary impulse, Anglo imperial-adventurism, and Jewish supremacism are addicted to transforming the entire world.)

It's weird how Anglo nations are many times richer than Russia(that is strong in military but weak in economy) but politically many times weaker. The West is like one big Hong Kong under British Rule: Rich but a puppet of the Brits. Today, Anglo nations are rich but political and ideological colonies of Jews. When China deals with Russia, it is with a second-rate economic power but a first-rate political power. When China deals with the West, it is with a first-rate economic power but a third-rate political power. Just look at Justin Trudeau or the female leader of New Zealand. Even tough-talking Trump regularly takes it up the ass from Jews and acted as their hitman in the murder of hero Soleimani, the Iranian patriot who's been battling terrorists in Syria. All such Western goy politicians are mere tools and puppets of Jews. But Jews are so powerful that they can hide their power, and goy-cucks play along with the hope that, if they suck up to Jews just one more time, Jews will be nice to them. So, white 'liberals' blame Russia for everything, and white 'conservatives' blame China for everything. Jewish Power manipulates and corrupts US politics, but we had three long years of Russia Collusion nonsense. Jews control US institutions, but we now get 'China Inc or Chinc. controls everything'. It's downright hysterical.

There was a time when the West was both a first-rate political and first-rate economic power. White Christian elites ruled, and they were united as one people with white Christian masses. But over time, Jews took over, and white elites became managerial cucks serving the Jewish globo-homo agenda. And white masses were to be replaced by White Nakba, race-mixed with jungle fever & bamboo fever, and/or killed off with opioids(sold by Jews who once sold opium to the Chinese). Then, the cure is obvious: White Liberation from Jewish supremacism. Unity of white elites and white masses. Nationalism like in Hungary. But we hear NONE of this from the likes of Tucker Carlson. All we get is blaming China for globalism that is really the tool of Jews. The truth is China is prepared to deal with nationalist white nations. Rise of nationalism in White Nations may be disadvantageous to China in certain areas, but Chinese are not ones to tell white nations what to do. (The 'woke' anti-white Chinese in the West are the products of Western PC media and academia controlled by Jews. Chinese in China tend to despise the 'white left'.) They will adapt to the new reality. The one group that is most hostile to revival of nationalism in white nations is the Jews. This is why Jews are now urging whites not to restore nationalism in white nations but to attack Chinese nationalism as the source of globalism's problems. By blaming Chinese NATIONALISM, snuff nationalism in the West as well.

The problem is Anglos are doing NOTHING about the source of US enslavement to globalism: Jewish Power. If anything, they are pretending China is the master of globalism and forced globalism on the West. This is total nonsense. Jews pushed globalism on the West. Jews urged big business in the West to dump on their own workers and send factories to Mexico & China and outsource to India. Jews in Silicon Valley invited all those Hindus. Jewish New York Times hires Hindu and Chinese 'woke' scholars to dump on whites. China didn't create this World Order but merely took part in it. Also, despite all the corruption and brutality of current China, it did make real products and shipped them to other nations, which did a helluva lot more for the world than Jews in Wall Street making trillions via financial manipulation.

If Anglos followed the Putinist model, they could bring back white pride and white-majority nationalism in the West. And then, they could deal with China on the basis of mutual respect. If China currently doesn't respect whites, it's because whites cuck to Jews. Chinese know Jews rule the West. And as whites are cucks of Jews, whites adopted Open Borders and can't say NO to mass immigration-invasion. So, if whites want pride and power back, they must come to terms with Jewish Power. But whites are so in awe of Jews(and so frightened of them) that they are in Alex Jones mode: Jones was deplatformed by Jews but blames the 'Chicoms' for his woes, perhaps in the hope that if he grovels before Jews by blaming everything on China, his accounts will be restored in Jewish-monopolistic platforms.

Whites must blame Jews for globalism. Whites must restore nationalism and white identity by pushing back against Jewish Power. But people like Tucker Carlson and John Derbyshire suck up to Jews... even though Jews hate them most. (It's like Jared Taylor has been denied Twitter and Paypal by Jews, but the fool censors anyone who speaks truth to Jewish Power at American Renaissance.) Jews even fund Antifa that went to Carlson's house and threatened his family. Derbyshire has been de-personed in journalism because Jews smeared him as 'white supremacist'.

Instead of confronting Jews to regain white identity and white-majority nationalism, whites are attacking Chinese nationalism. White 'conservatives' attack Chinese nationalism and white 'liberals' attack Russian nationalism. But if nationalism is bad, then it must be bad for the West too. But if nationalism is bad for China, Russia, and the West, how do we counter and control globalism?

White people need to restore nationalism and come to terms with Russian nationalism and Chinese nationalism(and Iranian nationalism and etc), but instead they blame China for globalism while being utterly amnesiac about the fact that the West embarked on globalism that was created by Jews and Anglo-traitors. If whites don't restore nationalism and merely blame China for globalism, then the result will be continued globalism, especially as the REAL source of globalism goes unmentioned: Jewish Power.

Also, if the West is to pursue nationalism, it must give up on imperialism. It is downright hypocritical for the West to bitch about China(and Russia) when the US and NATO invaded and destroyed nations in Middle East and North Africa in Wars for Israel. It is Trump, tool of Jews, who is interfering in Venezuela. Also, how many Chinese naval bases surround the US? How many US military bases surround China? Who created the mess in Ukraine by instigating a coup?

Wittingly or not, John Derbyshire is merely a shill of Jewish globalists who are trying to blame China for the World Order that Jews have created. If nations like US, Canada, and Australia were to go nationalist and ban further Chinese immigration and investment, China will accept the policies and learn to live with them. It is Jews who will go crazy and denounce white nations as 'racist', 'xenophobic', and 'nazi' at the slightest whiff of white majority interests. It's the Jews and castrated white cucks who insist that even the sentiment "It's Okay to be White" is 'racist'. Has China or Russia denounced Viktor Orban and Hungary? No, all the hatred comes from Jews, and those Jews are well-served by Anglo-cucks who now bark like dogs at the feet of their Jewish masters.

Cuck Trump Murders Iranian Hero Soleimani — The Globalist Paradox: The More Jewish Power Torments You, the More You Must Serve It — On Why Trump serves the Jewish Globalists who Torment Him and Wage War on Iranians who have no beef with him

What do Donald Trump and Iran have in common? Both are targeted by Jews for destruction. And yet, Trump attacks Iran than lash back at Jewish Power. But why? It’s in the hope that Jews won’t tear him another a**hole. Indeed, Jews have threatened him with Russia Hoax and impeachment so that he wouldn’t dare altering US foreign policy from total servility to Jewish Global Hegemonism. The Jewish injunction to Trump is, “We can destroy you, and the ONLY thing keeping you afloat is the support of certain hawkish Jews in the GOP. If you want those Jews to stick by your side, you will worsen relations with Russia, sabotage peace with North Korea, and provoke Iran into war." And so, Trump acts in the behest of those who hate him most.
Most dumb Trump voters will likely support war with Iran because THEIR GUY is dropping the bombs(just like Obama supporters looked the other way when Libya, Syria, and Ukraine were destroyed). They are too stupid to realize that Trump is trembling and acting at the behest of Jews out of utter fear. The US seemingly acts in the position of strength against Iran because the president is in a position of weakness vis-a-vis the Jews. Trump dares not spell out the identity of those who’ve harmed him most. Instead, he plays ‘tough guy’ with Iran in the hope that Jews will ease their attacks on him. It’s all so pathetic and embarrassing. Jews are pushing another goyim-kill-goyim scenario while they sit back and enjoy the show. Trump knows that Jews are simply TOO POWERFUL to handle. Not only do Jews control most of the elite institutions/industries but via their control, they've managed to fool so many Americans that the greatest sin is to be critical of Jewish Power: Antisemitism!

Trump is acting out the American Paradox. Jews have such total power in the globo-homo West that the only way to ease the Jewish attack on you is to submit to them even harder. Jews have done everything to disparage and defame Trump, and what does the ‘tough guy’ do? To ease the agony, he sucks up to Zion more than ever in the hope that ‘my Jews’ will push back against the Other Jews. Jews are the gods of America. In the Bible, if the God clobbers you, your only hope of salvation is to serve Him with greater zeal. In America, if Jews kick your butt, your only hope is they will kick you less hard the next time around if you kiss their arse.

Jewish Power is playing good cop and bad cop as it toys with Trump. The current political situation is not a case of Trump & ‘right-wing’ Jews versus ‘liberal’ Jews. It’s really about ‘liberal’ Jews and ‘right-wing’ Jews working in tandem behind the scenes against Trump. Because Jews are so powerful and regarded as a Holy People(thanks largely to Jewish control of media and academia), anyone who matters in power-circles has to have some ‘My Jews’ on his side. It’s akin to having angels, even god, on one’s side. You are vulnerable without the moral shield of Jewish blessing; but with it, you have license to be murderous and nihilistic because ANYTHING is permitted in the current climate IF it's presented as Blessed-by-Holy-Jews. Invoking "Jews On My Side" is the ticket to power and privilege, that is if you're not Jewish yourself.
Jews, ‘right-wing’ and ‘liberal’, want the US to keep creating turmoil for the Middle East and Russia for the sake of Jewish Globalist Power. What Jews of all stripes fear most is Trump toning down US foreign policy and especially putting an end to the Wars for Israel. So, when ‘liberal’ Jews concocted stuff like Russia Collusion Hoax, accusations of ‘white supremacism’, and the Impeachment circus, Trump came to rely on the support of ‘right-wing’ Jews more than ever. If Holy Jews attack you, it means you are at a moral disadvantage, and it simply wouldn’t do to fight back on your own. The Jews who attack you must be countered by other Jews who also possess superior moral authority. Jews are like the nukes of moral authority in the West. So, if ‘liberal’ Jews attack you, you need to have other Jews on your side. Or else, you risk being morally nuked to oblivion. Imagine ‘liberal’ Jews attacking Trump and then being joined by ‘right-wing’ Jews. Trump, attacked by both ‘liberal’ and ‘right-wing’ Jews, will be toast because the entirety of the holy race of Jews will be tearing him limb from limb.

In the Trojan War, both the Greeks and Trojans needed the support of some of the gods against the other gods arraigned against their side. Half the gods were with the Trojans, half were with the Greeks. If either Trojans or Greeks lost all support of the gods, they’d be toast. So, at a minimum, they had to placate the gods on their side. As Jews have taken on the role of the gods of America, goyim always need some Jews on their side. Without Jewish support, you are politically godless. This is a bigger problem with white ‘conservatives’ because most Jewish gods & angels are with the Democrats and white ‘liberals’ like Hillary Clinton. Because the GOP has a Jewish-god-angel deficit, it has to go out on a limb, especially by cucking 200% to Israel to prove their Philo-Semitic bona fides.
Trump ran in 2016 with a goyish version of chutzpah and displeased many Jews. Though he always praised Jews & Israel and condemned Iran, he also denounced Neocon wars, spoke of better relations with Russia(a nation loathed by pathological Jews), flirted with the Alt Right, and partially awakened white political consciousness. Trump was partly trolling, but even he, despite long knowledge of and experience with Jews, had no idea how hard the Jews would hit him. Of course, ALL Jews loved the fact that the big media and deep state were out to get Trump. ALL Jews wanted him gone, but as long as he was in the Oval Office, ‘right-wing’ Jews chose to play ‘good cop’ to the ‘bad cop’ played by Democratic Jews. There was a wink-wink understanding between ‘liberal’ Jews and ‘right-wing’ Jews that the harder the former pushed against Trump, the more he would have to lean on the support from the latter. Again, as Jews are a holy god-people, no one can survive in US power/politics without the support of SOME Jews. Precisely because the ‘liberal’ Jews(and even some Never-Trumper Neocons) bashed Trump so hard, he felt an ever greater need to shore up support from ‘right-wing’ Jews, but this was availed ONLY IF he reversed his promise to improve relations with Russia — rendered impossible by Russian Collusion Hoax — , submitting to all of Israel’s demands, and worsening relations with Iran to the point of possible war.

‘Right-wing’ Jews pretend to oppose the ‘liberal’ Jews, but they know that Trump will be drawn closer to them if and only if he’s driven near-mad with constant assault from 'liberal' Jews. In order for 'right-wing' Jews to squeeze out 'protection money' from Trump, he needs to be constantly threatened by 'liberal' Jews. 'Right' or 'left', a Jew's main loyalty is to fellow Jews than some ideology, let alone to another racial or ethnic group.
As Jews have been elevated to divine moral status, nothing is as damaging as being condemned by the Tribe. Also, as the mass media are almost totally owned and/or controlled by Jews, the usual mouthpieces will only join forces with Deep State and Jewish globalists to hound Trump. Then, the only way out for Trump is to seek the backing of ‘right-wing’ Jews who pretend to be his friends but are working behind the scenes with ‘liberal’ Jews and the deep state. Trump is now just a caged bear or lion who does as told in order to survive. And so, he decided to pounce on Iran.
Besides, as such a hopeless coward who dare not call out on Jewish Power, the only way he can flex his muscles is by attacking the very thing that Jews hate most(other than him). After all, if Trump hits Iran, even ‘liberal’ Jews who hate him and oppose him at nearly every turn will be pleased because their true core conviction isn’t liberalism but Jewish Supremacism. Thorny-horny Jews can't be appeased for long, but they might ease on their attack IF you suck them off and swallow. Thus, they'll be a bit mellow before they get another hard-on, which won't be long. Jews play politics like they play chess. As Trump has been threatened with checkmate by Jews, Deep State, and the Mass Media, he feels that the only way he can crawl out of this mess is by reaching for the helping hand of ‘right-wing’ Jews, but this hand comes with a steep price. They demand that Trump remain in Syria & steal the oil, worsen relations with Russia, and provoke Iran into war.

The best thing that the Iranians could do is blurt out the truth for all the world to hear. Especially if your side is militarily disadvantaged, truth must be the main weapon. The Iranian leader should mock and shame Donald Trump as a cuck-stooge of not only Zionism but Jewish Supremacism that rules the US. He should point out how Jewish Zionist Power has been out to destroy Trump from day one, but the orange-man coward remains most servile to the very group that has done most to undermine his presidency and smear his reputation.
The current state of the world is so embarrassing. It's like goyim of all stripes are stuck in some gladiatorial ring under Jewish orchestration. Jews hate whites and Trump. Jews hate Iranians. Given that both groups have in common the rabid & virulent hostility of Jewish supremacists, the most natural thing would be for the two sides to see eye to eye and unite against the Jews. Whites and Iranians are natural allies. But what do they do? Trump, the so-called 'white nationalist' and 'worse than Hitler', sucks up to Jews and attacks Iran. And Iran feels compelled to denounce all of America when the real culprits are the freaking Jews. Goyim are like the gladiators in SPARTACUS who, though slaves of Roman tyranny, slaughter each other for the amusement of Roman elites. Though Jews are hostile to whites and Iranians, whites are willing to kill Iranians to win approval from their Jewish masters, and Iranians waste so much time denouncing all of the US. What the world needs is a Spartacus-like figure. Spartacus united the slaves and made them fight Rome than each other. Goyim need to unite to fight Jewish Supremacist Power. This is where China, Russia, and Iran are doing the right thing by coordinating their war games, but they are still loathe to Name the Jew. Current US belligerence is the direct outcome of Jewish domination.

Iranians should throw Trump's words right back in his face. In 2016, Trump said the Iraq War was a total disaster, and that the US should get out of the Middle East. He also said the US should make peace by working with Russia. But since then, Jewish supremacists and their cuck-minions in the Deep State have done everything to undermine Trump, and the weary beast has succumbed to Jewish machinations. Trump is more Sparky the running dog than Spartacus. But then, much of the blame must go to white American Conservatives over the decades. Their brand of idiotic Christianity, atomizing libertarianism, smug BBQ cookout patriotism, and anti-intellectualism led to all the elite institutions being taken over by Jews, progs, and cucky-wucks.
It could be Putin is mute about Jewish power because the Russian economy is still substantially in Jewish hands. One might hope China will be bold in stating the truth, but the Chinese way is strategic than principled. Also, China has been drawn into US Market-Imperialism, much like Taiwan and Japan. It's been the gambit of American Power as the sole superpower with a vast market. If old European Empires suppressed economic growth in their colonies, US encourages economic growth as dependent on US markets. Thus, all the economies that grew by selling to the US are deathly afraid of losing market access. As the religion of the US is now globo-homo-shlomo-afro, they dare not speak the truth that Jewish Power is behind the current rot of globalist cultural and military imperialism.

It is about time for Russia, Iran, and all nations to mock the US as a Jewish Supremacist empire, one where craven white cowards do little but crawl on their knees and pledge undying support for Jewish supremacists and Zion. Why is it so? Because soulless US is only about one thing: Money-and-Idolatry. Jews got the money and idolized themselves as the supreme identity group that ALL other groups must serve. While Jewish elites rub their hands at the prospect of another Middle East War, it will be goyim , white American soldiers and countless Persians/Arabs/Muslims, who will do all the killing and dying. Jewish globalists went from Semites to Supremites, and now, so-called Anti-Semitism is Anti-Supremitism, which is more necessary than ever. And it's about time Russia addressed the J-Question. Vladimir Putin has been silent on this for too long, but it is time for truth. It is time to put down the gauntlet. No, one should not make crazy neo-nazi talking points. They just need to speak the truth that Judeo-Nazis control the US, the lone superpower, and that the Jewish modus operandi is Jewish hegemony at any cost. Also, Zionism has turned into Yinon-ism based on the Yinon Plan.

We've all been duped by Jewish Power. There was a time when Jews assured goyim, "Stick with us, and you shall have true free speech", "Struggle with us against unfettered capitalist greed", and "Support our cause to expose the Deep State so as to create a more open and transparent society." But Jews weren't really against Excessive Power & Privilege. They just wanted to bring down the old Wasp elites so that they, as the new elites, would have the power to curtail free speech, rake in all the profits, and use deep state apparatus to destroy rivals and critics. Jews are like the pigs in ANIMAL FARM. Jewish Power is the main source of many woes around the world, but because of the stigma of 'antisemitism', so many people will blame anyone but the Jews. When Alex Jones got deplatformed, whom did he blame? The 'Chicoms'. Trump is pushed against the rope, so whom does he rattle his saber at? Iranians. John McCain and Mitt Romney were smeared and slimed by the Jew-run mass media(despite their total cuckery to Zion) in 2008 and 2012, but whom did they rag on? Trump and his supporters. What a sorry bunch. (Granted, morons like Richard Spencer and the Neo-Nazi crew deserve their share of blame by sinking the promising dissident Alt Right label with what amounts to white supremacism and even neo-Nazism, thereby making it more difficult for Trump to address legitimate white interests.)

Anyway, imagine a scenario where Nazi Germany attacks Poland, France, Russia, and Great Britain but all those nations praise Hitler & Nazi Germany while taking out their rage and frustration on each other. Loony, ain't it? Well, such is the state of the world today. Jews torment and destroy so many peoples around the world, but entire nations are willing to war against one other while speaking and doing nothing about the Jewish Glob. Unless people understand the urgency of Naming the Jew, nothing will change. It's like a doctor won't cure cancer if he does EVERYTHING but name the cancer. If there's a dead rat decaying and stinking up the apartment, no amount of 'solutions' will fix the problem unless someone names the dead rat and removes it from the premises. After WWII, Jews got a grace period, well-deserved due to the Shoah. But it's time to face facts about Jews of the Now. Pretending Jews are still Shoah victims is like pretending current China is still the 'Sick Man of Asia' of the 19th century. Times change, and Jews are the supreme rulers of the world, and this must be called out. But that worthless pile of shi* Trump only sucks up to Jews more even as they bugger his ass. And white Americans are truly retarded. Jewish Power is carrying out White Nakba in US, EU, Canada, and Australia — as cuck-white elites in media, academia, and institutions are nothing but mental minions of Jewish Power, as in Jews lead, goyim follow — , and whites are being turned into New Palestinians, but all these worthless white 'conservatives' are cheering Trump's anti-BDS law that violates the US constitution. How utterly pathetic.

The Most Important Fact of Post-Cold-War Globalist Hegemony is that Jewish Power won the INVISIBLE WAR

When we think of wars, we usually think of military conflicts. The US has been involved in many of those and won most of them. Even when it lost, the other side suffered far greater harm than the US. It’s been said the US lost the Vietnam War, but when we consider the respective damages suffered by both nations, there is simply no comparison. The Vietnamese forced the US to give up South Vietnam but suffered most of the losses. It was nearly a Pyrrhic Victory as the US proper remained untouched(except by anti-war protests) whereas Vietnam had to rebuild nearly everything up from scratch. Think of Dragline(George Kennedy)'s 'loss' to Paul Newman's character in COOL HAND LUKE. Dragline walks away, but Luke got all the lumps. Many argue that the US lost in Iraq too, but then, who'd be the winner? It certainly wasn't the Iraqis who were rocked not only by the invasion but by ensuing civil strife that tore the nation apart(and continues to haunt them to this day). The other great 'war' of the 20th century was known as the 'Cold War' where the US and USSR managed not to confront each other directly, mainly out of fear of World War III that might even include nuclear weapons. Thus, the Cold War was considered a war of nerves than of arms. Still, both sides used proxies who died in the millions and for whom the 'cold war' was anything but a game of bluff and brinkmanship.

Anyway, there is a kind of war no less crucial than military wars(and far more consequential than 'cold wars'). It might be called the Invisible War. Beginning in the Sixties and especially following the end of the Cold War, the Power within the US was largely determined by the outcome of an Invisible War. It was this War, more than the Cold War and its end, that shaped the future of America and the World, much of which is but a political, economic, and cultural colony of the US-as-lone superpower. USSR had once been a hegemon and global player in both hard and soft power, but ultimately it failed to win the hearts & minds, eyes & ears, (and/or the loins and groins) of the masses of the world who could see that the 'Free World' was winning in Food and Feels. So, once the Soviet system collapsed(or was collapsed from within by wanna-be oligarchs who wanted to profit from being part of the World Order), the question was which group would get to shape America’s lone-superpower agenda for the entire world? Controlling America is like having a machine gun in a room where others have sticks or, at most, pistols.

The outcome of the Invisible War mattered a great deal especially because the US came to be ethnically & racially diverse. Victory of one group over the other could alter the 'racial' character of the US agenda. All nations experience Invisible Wars among various groups contending for dominance, but in a homogeneous nation, the dominant race-and-culture remains in charge regardless as to which side wins. Suppose there are various factions vying for power in China. Whichever wins, China would be controlled by Chinese, and its policy vis-a-vis the rest of the world would be Sino-centric. But imagine if the invisible war(of jockeying for power) in China were fought among Chinese and various non-Chinese groups. Perchance, if a non-Chinese group gained top power in China, it could fundamentally change the nature of China's place in the world because it'd likely use China to serve its own tribal interests than what is good for most Chinese people. In a way, China was trapped in such condition under the rule of Manchu dynasties whose relation to China was ambiguous. In some ways, they were part of Chinese civilization, but they also regarded the Chinese as their subjects, and that partly explains why, when threatened by Western Imperialism, they feared the awakening of Chinese Nationalism as much as they feared foreign aggression — Chinese nationalist uprising to do away with the 'foreign devils' might just as well sweep aside the Manchu ruling elites as well.
Likewise, the reason why so much hung in the balance in Russia of the 1990s and 2000s was because the success or failure of Putinism would decide whether Russia would remain sovereign or fall into the clutches of Jewish-supremacist globalists. (It was perhaps a shock for many Russians to realize the full extent to which American Jews had consolidated power during the Cold War, indeed even to the point of dictating their agenda to the once-great Wasps reduced to pushovers of the Chutzpah Clan.) Though a tiny minority in Russia, the Jews with their higher IQ, radical will, & support from World Jewry almost managed to wrest total control of the Russian nation. Had the Jews gained total dominance, the Russian state wouldn't have served the Russian people but would have been exploited, manipulated, and abused simply to maximize (the mostly extractive)Jewish Power around the world.

When America was mostly white and Anglo-ruled(and Anglo-Americanized even among non-Anglo white ethnics, most of whom were Christian and traced their roots back to Europe), the outcome of the Invisible War(among various factions of Anglo-American and/or Anglo-Americanized white gentile groups) had far less dire consequences regardless of which side won. In the end, it was one bunch of Anglo-Americans or Anglo-Americanized gentile whites or another bunch of the more-or-less the same. Liberal or Conservative, American Interests remained essentially white-and-Anglo-centric, and this was more-or-less just because the US for most of its history was overwhelmingly white and Christian. (It's like the aftermath of the Civil War when, once the dust settled, America was still ruled by white Christian gentiles who, in sympathy with their defeated racial brethren in the South, didn't throw them to the wolves or apes of ghastly black power.) Thus, the white elites were representative of their racial masses, and the masses were supportive of their racial elites.
And on this basis, the entire world knew what American Power was really about — an expansive Anglo-centrism — and adjusted their positions accordingly when dealing with America. This arrangement was good for white American elites, white American masses, and nations around the world. Good or bad, right or wrong, the world understood WHO ruled America and WHAT Americanism was about in terms of its reach, promise, limitation, and hypocrisy(which is inherent to any system in the absence of real world utopias). For most of US history, the only major groups vying for power were white Northern-European Protestants, or Wasps. Even when waves of immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe added new groups in the contest of power, most of them were rapidly Anglo-Americanized and deferred to Wasp Power as deserving to rule for historical, cultural, and meritocratic reasons. Given the relatively poor governance and entrenched levels of corruption in the nations and kingdoms whence they came, they couldn't help but be impressed by the New Nation created by Anglo-Americans out of the vast wilderness.

But something fundamentally changed since the 1960s, a period when the Invisible War was no longer about white gentiles vs white gentiles(thus ensuring white gentile rule no matter which side won) but came down to enervating Wasps vs energizing Jews. This was fought in the realm of media, academia, arts, culture, finance, ideas, and various industries. But it wasn’t a simple 'turf war' between racial/ethnic/religious groups like the ones between, say, the Italian mafia and the Irish machine. The lines were NOT clearly drawn in terms of 'us' and 'them'. Invisible War happens in the realm of ideas, values, discourse, and culture, and that means your side could be seduced and recruited to serve the other side. You could be colonized by the ideas, narratives, and values of the enemy camp(posing as the friend to all). In such conflict, the winners tend to be the ones who are more energetic, creative, ruthless, and cunning in the fields of media, academia, propaganda, advertising, arts & culture, and of course, finance(as lots of money are needed to fund think tanks and lavish prizes on the willing).
The crucial problem for whites wasn't simply that Jews were more energetic and big-minded than Wasps(known for moderation, pragmatism, and empiricist caution) in the field of ideas and culture but that White Liberals were more creative and energetic than White Conservatives. Given the numerical advantage, whites could have held Jewish Power at bay IF white liberals and white conservatives had combined their power and resources. White Liberal decision in the 20th century served as the linchpin of America's destiny. Would they offer their considerable intellectual and creative talents in a racial alliance with white conservatives, OR would they side with the sneaky Jews who speciously espoused that they were not out for Jewish Power but for universal justice for all, a noble cause worthy of commitment by White Liberals so eager to do the right thing? If Jews had been honest about their agenda, their blatant tribalism would have given offense to white liberals who therefore might have sided with white conservatives to check Jewish power seeking supremacy and hegemony(not unlike the Nazis). But Jews hid their tribalism, or they white-washed it as a means to honor their tragic history as poor innocent helpless little victims. White liberals fell for the bait and threw their lot with the Jews, and there was no way that white conservatives, lacking in spark and creativity, could have fended off the combined power of Jews and White Liberals.
Also, if in times past, even victorious white liberals regarded white conservatives as their racial brethren and favored them over the Other, the victorious Jews(who edged out others in the coalition) pressed upon white liberals to hate, despise, and hold in contempt the incorrigible white conservatives who are either stupid rubes, unimaginative bigots, or crytpo-nazis. Then, it is not surprising that, over time, more and more Wasps went over to the Jewish camps as allies, servants, and finally cucks. As Jewish ideas came to dominate over White Liberal ones, not least because white liberals were also tainted with 'white guilt' that undermined their moral legitimacy — indeed, white liberal pride is mostly about how it feels more self-loathing about being white than white conservatives do, i.e., "We weep harder when we read TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD" — , the Jewish/White Liberal relationship essentially became one of teacher and student, moral master and moral slave, spiritual pimp and new age prostitute. Most Liberal Wasps pitifully came under the domination of Jewish politics. And in time, most Wasp conservative figures followed suit and were mentally-colonized by Neocon thought. Jews won not only by conflict but conversion.

Ultimately, Jews won the Invisible War in America, and that's why they've been able to push an agenda that's been turning the world upside down with Wars for Israel, Open Borders, anti-nativism, pro-invasivism, Homomania, deranged feminism, Afromania, and Jungle Fever that promotes ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs).

It is a strange agenda, of course. At its core, it is undeniably tribal and ethno-supremacist, but it is promoted as ‘western values’, ‘human rights’, or ‘universal principles’, all vague notions manipulated and distorted in meaning and implication to serve an agenda that, more often than not, aligns with Jewish supremacist machinations. But then, just like Stalinism and George Orwell's ANIMAL FARM illustrated so powerfully, the Power can shape truth to be just about anything, not least because most people are craven cowards, malleable lunkheads whose brains are clay in Jewish hands, or opportunists who will go with the strong horse(and thirty pieces of silver).
This ‘universal values’ requires the US(and that means ALL OF US who contribute to American Power) to make life hell for Muslims over there but hug them like long-lost brothers over here, especially if they are to demographically replace white Americans(and even black Americans). It’s seems crazy and illogical, but once you understand the Power and all those who serve it, what seems like contradictions on the surface make perfect sense at the core: "Is it good for Jews?" or better yet, "Is it great for Jewish Supremacism?"

China and America: Direct Censorship and Indirect Censorship — How Indirect Censorship and Ethno-Theocracy have led to Current Rot in the West

We do not really have freedom of speech. Say “ni**er” once and you can lose a job of thirty years. Or criticize Jews, Israel, blacks, homosexuals, Muslims, feminists, or transsexuals.

We do not really have freedom of speech. Say “ni**er” once and you can lose a job of thirty years. Or criticize Jews, Israel, blacks, homosexuals, Muslims, feminists, or transsexuals.

There is direct censorship and indirect censorship. Direct censorship is what China has. It prohibits certain kind of speech, period. Indirect censorship is what the US has in increasing measure. You can say whatever, but if you say the 'wrong' thing, the consequences are so dire(especially economically) that you are effectively tarred & feathered, shunned and destroyed. Rick Sanchez found out how this works after he said Jews dominate in the media. And CNN recently fired a black guy for defending Palestine at the UN.

https://twitter.com/TwitterMoments/status/1068275992685203457

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1068286959595003909

Marc Lamont Hill dared to mention that 2018 is the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map and that the current Zionist regime uses Apartheid Policies in Occupied West Bank as continuation of Western Imperialism that wages war on indigenous nationalism of the Palestinian people. Jew-run CNN got rid of him, which goes to show that Jews are holier than blacks(and certainly the long-suffering Palestinians).


Personally, I think there are some cases where firing-based-on-speech is warranted. If an organization is inherently ideological, then it has every right to hire or fire people based on their views and convictions. So, if National Review feels that one of its writers is too leftist, he may be fired. Or a person that seems hostile to Zionism may be fired by Commentary Magazine that is committed to Israel First Policy.

But most professions are non-ideological, and it seems utterly wrong to fire someone on the basis of creed, conscience, or conviction. And progressives would have agreed with this position in the 50s when many communists and fellow-travelers were either fired/blacklisted or threatened with such, not least in Hollywood. Also, as long as a person performs his duties well at work, what does it matter what he believes in his personal life? If one's personal creed, ideology, or faith is the basis of whether he can have a job or use financial services, then we no longer have a free society. According to Jewish-controlled PC, in order for you to be able to work and live, it means you can't have certain personal beliefs. Personal conviction and creed have been professionalized, i.e. no work and wages for people with certain views.
Now, imagine if a business fires anyone suspected of being a Zionist on the basis that Zionism is imperialism and commits 'genocide' against Palestinians. Would Jews tolerate this? Of course not. And I would agree with Jews. No Jew should be fired for his Zionist beliefs EVEN IF the owner of the business believes Zionism is evil. Richard Dawkins is virulently anti-religious and believes religious faith is a mental disease of ignorance and hatred. But if he owned a trucking company, should he fire people on the basis of their faith because he believes religion is a 'hate system of the mind'?

Now, there are certain exceptions. Certain jobs are publicity-oriented and involve putting forth an image. So, if a company wants to project a certain kind of image or message and IF its representative or spokesman or spokeswoman is associated with certain kind of ideology, I can see why the company would want to let that person go. If a company is about Family Values and if it turns out that its representative is a wild swinger and promotes promiscuity, I can see why the company would let that person go EVEN IF the person acts wild in his personal life. But most jobs are not publicity-related, and it is simply wrong to deny someone work and wages based on what he believes in his personal life.

This is why China's social credit system is chilling. It will create a nation of conformist cowards. China is spiraling back into the mindset that made it fall behind. A nation where everyone is too afraid to say his piece. New China may allow money-making, but when a society favors profits over freedom and conscience, it becomes crass, shallow, and materialistic.

Now, the Chinese may be pushing such a rule because they see the Free West as decadent and degenerate as a result of excess freedom. But this is where the Chinese would be wrong. The West rotted from lopsided freedom that favored the power and expression of certain groups over others. West lost its sense of balance because voices of certain groups and interests were effectively silenced. It's like ecology. If you get rid of certain species, the natural balance goes out of whack and things fall apart. If you get rid of predators, it may seem good for the prey animals, but in time, the herbivores multiply and eat up all the vegetation and destroy their habitats. So, there has to be a balance of prey and predators in nature. The problem of EU is that following WWII, the Right was effectively silenced because it was associated with Nazism. Thus, leftist elements grew too strong and out-of-control. Now, leftism is invaluable to modern society, but it needs to be balanced by rightism that is also essential to social equilibrium. But suppression of the right led to overgrowth of leftism that led to crazy stuff like May 68 lunacy that paved the way for current degenerate France. When left and right were both well-represented, they had to compete to remain healthy and strong. But once the left was allowed to totally dominate culturally and ideologically, it grew decadent and degenerate from corruption and self-satisfaction.

So, if China thinks the West became crazy due to excess of free speech and freedom in general, it would be wrong. The West grew sick from suppression of rightist freedoms and expressions in favor of leftist ideology and obsessions. In the West, even the far-left was protected in academia and media BUT the far-right was banned. Only the wussy cuck-right and bland 'white bread' right were tolerated. If any rightist lurched slightly more rightward, he was denounced as 'far right'. As Jonathan Haidt has argued, Western academia is suffering from lack of real discourse and back-and-forth argumentation. Because the leftists are protected from challenge by rightists, the former has grown lazy, corrupt, decadent, and flabby. Their hysterics are really about cowardice and unwillingness to face real challenge from the Right. They demand protection from being 'triggered' by wrongthink or 'hate speech'. They rarely directly address the voices on the Right. They just go for lazy short-cut of denouncing others as 'racist' or 'nazi'.

But the problem isn't merely ideological but ethnic. When Wasps(or Anglo-Americans) ruled America, it was fair game to notice that (1) Anglos got the power (2) Anglos got the privilege (3) Anglos got the connections (4) Anglos hogged the prestige. So, despite the great power of Anglos, they came under scrutiny and criticism, not least by reformist Anglos who thought criticism and self-criticism were good things. Thus, there was a lively debate among Wasps, Irish Catholics, various ethnics, Jews, and others. Though blacks were suppressed for most of US history, they too became vocal and offered their perspective and made demands that had validity. In terms of social debate, the period from mid 50s to the mid 80s were probably the golden age of free speech and debate. With each year, there was more push for free speech, and many sides had their say. But the worrying development in that period was the growing sacralization of Jews and blacks. It was one thing to allow Jews and blacks to make their case and join in the national debate. Surely, Jews and blacks had their own grievances and legit demands. But, just as undeniable was the fact that Jews and blacks also caused a lot of problems that harmed other groups. Jewish role in US foreign policy led to fiasco in the Middle East, especially at cost to Palestinians. And even though the Civil Rights Movement was a great event in US history(and there's no denying the injustices done to blacks), it was also true that blacks posed a threat to other races because blacks are more muscular and more aggressive by nature. So, once blacks got equal legal protections, they used much of their freedom to attack, rape, rob, and murder other peoples, leading to white flight among not only white conservatives but white liberals and Jews. So, in a truly free society, not only would Jews and blacks get to have their say against goyim & whites but goyim & whites would get to air their grievances against Jews and blacks. That way, all sides would say their piece and all sides would be checked and balanced by healthy and constructive counter-criticism.
But the consecration of Jews and blacks as holy-schmoly groups made this nearly impossible. So, while Jews could scream about 'anti-Semites' and 'Nazis' endlessly — Jews now cry 'nazi' like the kid cried 'wolf' — , we are not allowed to notice Jewish power, Jewish abuses, and Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. And no matter how much crime and violence blacks commit, we are supposed to see Negroes only through the rose-tinted glasses of TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD and MLK sermons. And no matter how many whites(and non-blacks) fall victim to black robbery, beatings, rapes, and murders, we are supposed to wake up Groundhogday-like and dream of supposedly angelic Emmett Till.

When a group is sacralized in a supposedly secular society, the effect is essentially theocratic. Jews and blacks are holy-schmoly in the US, and so, we can't have a honest debate about the problems they cause. We can't talk about Jewish role in communism, Zionist role in Middle East Wars, globalist Jewish economic looting of Russia in the 90s, and Neocon recruitment of Neo-Nazis in Ukraine. And it doesn't matter how many times blacks burn down cities and assault/rob people. It is simply 'racist' to notice that blacks, being more muscular and more aggressive, tend to commit far more crime and violence than other groups. US has become essentially an ethno-theocracy where we must always speak of Jews and blacks in hushed tones.

Of course, homos joined Jews and blacks in the holy-schmoly pantheon. Why? Because Jews control media, academia, finance, and deep state. And Jews decided homos are their perfect ally as fellow high-achieving minority elites. Because homos were made holy-schmoly(and associated with holier-schmolier Jews), even cultural conservatives clammed up about the Homo Agenda. They were afraid of being labeled 'homophobic', an especially bogus term cooked up by Jews to imply that if you don't sufficiently honor and praise homos, you are suffering from mental malady of phobic proportions. And so, homos & trannies and fecal penetration & penis-and-ball-cutting were associated with 'rainbows' and 'pride'. Indeed, 'gay pride' simply became 'Pride', as if to suggest the essence of pride = homo buggery and tranny dick-cutting. And if you found homo-fecal-penetration and tranny penis-cutting to be gross and sick and said so, you were blacklisted and fired worse than any Jewish communist during the so-called 'McCarthy Era'. At least the HUAC blacklists ended in a few yrs. These Jewish led PC blacklists last forever because Jewish Power has a near-Stalinist grip on media, academia, and deep state.

The fact is Homomania-as-neo-religion(that festoons churches with 'gay colors') and 'Gay Marriage' would never have become New Western Values IF there had been real free speech that allowed all sides to have their say. If real free debate had been allowed on the Homo Agenda, the lies and falsehoods could easily have been exposed. But, the Jewish-controlled media used the 'rainbow' idolatry to elevate Homo-worship as a new religion in the West. If you were not with the sacred program, you were a blasphemer, a 'homophobe' who must be econo-excommunicated from work & wages. Or a bakery must be sued out of existence by the 'gay cabal' with the full backing of Jewish Supremacist law firms. Jewish Power treats decent moral bakeries like Zionists treat Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank. Jewish Power says 'my way or the highway'.

In Europe, a continent with no legal protection of free speech, Jewish pressure led to criminalization of speech deemed offensive to Jews and homos(and even African migrant-invaders). In the US, where Constitution guarantees free speech, the culture of open discourse was destroyed by indirect censorship and ethno-homo-theocracy. Even though Jewish Power couldn't ban free speech, its control of media and finance meant they could destroy anyone or any group that dared to be politically incorrect toward Jews, blacks, and homos. Thus, anyone who wanted to keep his job or reputation had to clam up about certain things, no matter how true or based on facts. Also, the sacralization of Jews, blacks, and homos meant that they could spew any amount of hateful, rabid, and virulent venom at goyim, whites, Christians, straight people, and etc. BUT they themselves were PROTECTED from critical speech that dared to expose their corruption, abuses, and fraudulence. This is why the West grew sick. Not from freedom but lopsided monopoly of freedom for certain groups, esp. Jews, blacks, and Homos as the Holy-Schmoly Three.

Now, one could argue that China's censorship is preferable to American censorship because China is about Chinese nationalists ruling over Chinese people. So, the main theme of censorship is "Is it good for China as a whole?" In contrast, the US is a nation where the Jewish 2% rules over 98% that is goyim. So, the central theme of American Censorship is "Is it good for the 2% at the expense of the 98%?" Also, if China is about Chinese Majority Pride, the overwhelming theme for the White American Majority is White Guilt and White Shame. So, while Chinese government boosts Majority Chineseness, American government suppresses Majority Whiteness(and even pushes policies to turn the white majority into just another minority, as already happened in California, increasingly the land of oligarchs and helots, the vision of BLADE RUNNER).

Still, censorship will hurt China too in the long run because a nation that penalizes conscience and courage will result in increasing conformism and crassness.

Will China’s Rise be as Problematic as the Rise of Germany and Japan? What about Jewish Supremacist Power and the Problems of White Submissivism?

Some geopolitical strategists fear that China’s rise in the 21st century will mirror the dramatic rise of Germany and Japan in the late 19th century and first half of the 20th century. Perhaps, it’s a misplaced fear. Such assurance may seem counter-intuitive because China is so much bigger and more populous than Germany and Japan. Paradoxically, however, China might be less dangerous than Japan and Germany precisely because it is a bigger nation. Being huge in land mass and population in its own right, China may be satisfied with what it has. It surely wants to expand trade with the world, but China doesn’t need to conquer or control other nations to be a great power. It doesn’t need an empire because it is an empire-sized nation.

Same could be said for Russia. Its gigantic size and limitless resources ensure its place in the world as an important player. While Russians are underachievers, Russia doesn’t need more territory to be one of the great powers of the world.

In contrast, the reason why Japan and Germany became so problematic was the discrepancy between their ambitions(in will and ability) and their limitations(in land and resources). If both had been content to be normal nations, they would have accepted their prescribed place in the world. But modern Germany looked to Great Britain and France as models, moderate-sized nations that became world powers by amassing empires. Unlike the US and Russia that could be great on their own due to abundant geography and sizable & growing demography, France and Great Britain couldn’t be great on their own. They needed to control the seas and other lands.
Germans perceived themselves to be a capable, even superior, people, and felt deserving of greatness too, and that meant Germany needed an empire of its own.
As for Japan, its rapid rise filled them with confidence and then hubris. Especially after the great naval victory in the Russo-Japanese War, they began to feel they could overcome all odds. But like Germany, Japan had limited land mass and resources that could feed and supply only so many people. On its own, it could be a regional power but not a great power. Especially after observing the miserable failures of China, Japan saw itself as the rightful master-ruler of Asia.
Now, if China had modernized at the same time and at the same pace as Japan in the 19th century, then it would also have developed as an industrial power, and then, Japan would have had no choice but to acknowledge China as the dominant power in Asia. It would have been less likely for Japan to develop an over-sized national ego from the perception of China as the Sick Man of Asia. In its encounter with the West, China was slow to modernize whereas Japan did so almost overnight. Flush with power and success, Japan was determined to remain ahead of China as the main power of Asia. Back then, Japan was much smaller than China but much stronger, and China was much bigger than Japan but much weaker. This contradiction led to the great war between the two nations. It was like a fit and feisty small guy taking on a flabby and feeble big guy. Japan as the tough small guy was the better fighter but couldn’t deliver a KO blow to a guy who was too big despite his sickness. At any rate, because Japan could only be a great power by having an empire, it was desperate to gain more territory and clashed with other empires and eventually was crushed by the combined might of the Allies.

Well that was then, this is now. China now has both a bigger economy and bigger military than Japan. The bigger nation has the bigger power, and so, the geopolitical dynamics in Asia is more normal as it’s only natural that the bigger nation should be more powerful. Indeed, for most of Asian history, Japan had always acknowledged China as the main power in the region, and that recognition had been the basis of peace between them as well as with other Asian nations.

Now, will the newly risen China feel tempted to act like Japan in the first half of the 20th century? Flush with wealth and might, will it aggressively seek to gain hegemony over all of Asia and maybe the world? Will it be like Militarist Japan x 10? It’s unlikely because China doesn’t need more land and more people to be a great power. China can be a great power with what it has within its borders. Thus, its ambitions are limited to coastal areas. China has no territorial ambitions in other parts of the world. Also, it has enough problems within its own borders, especially with Tibetans and Uighurs. The last thing it needs is more ethnic conflicts.

So, which people will be the main menace to world peace and geopolitical stability? The main problem lies with the Jews because their Contradiction of Power is the most radioactive by far. What is the essence of this contradiction? Jews are rich in money and influence but poor in numbers(demographics). The result is a Jewish neurosis composed of equal measures of megalomania and paranoia.
Just think. Jews are more powerful than the Chinese, Hindus, Russians, Anglos, Germans, Japanese, French, and Iranians, but there are far fewer Jews than the populations of major gentile nations. Japan has over 110 million, Germany has 80 million, Russia has 125 million, etc. In contrast, there are only 13 million Jews in the world. And their nation, Israel, is a tiny speck in the Middle East. Jewish super-power owes to Jews controlling US(the most powerful nation on earth), UK, Canada, and the EU, but their influence hangs in the balance of White Submissivism, i.e. unless white gentiles continue to remain servile and defer to Jews, Jewish Power can collapse overnight.

This is why Jews are so fearful of the slightest whiff of White Identity & Interest and hysterically defame any sign of white consciousness as ‘white supremacism’. Without white gentiles putting Jewish interests before their own, Jewish supremacism cannot be sustained because Jews simply don’t have the numbers. It’s like a mind is useless if it can’t control the body. A cowboy is in trouble if he can’t control the steers. A shepherd is lost if the sheepdogs and sheep decide to do their own thing.

This is why Jews hate nationalism in all its manifestations except in Israel. Nationalism makes the people of a nation think mainly of their own kind, their own race and culture. Also, universal nationalism — national autonomy and sovereignty for each people and culture — means greater peace and stability among gentile nations as each nation will expect other nations to respect its sovereignty as it respects the sovereignties of other nations in turn. And then, there will be easier facilitation of trade and communication among nations. Also, if every nation is sovereign, it will find its own ways to deal with other nations. It won’t need a middleman power to get involved as the ultimate arbiter of what is doable and undoable, what is or isn’t right. In other words, there will be less reason for Jews to stick their noses into everything. There will be less need for Jews, period.

Therefore, it’s in the interest of Jewish Supremacism to have a turbulent world of gentiles vs. gentiles: US vs Muslims, EU vs Russia, US vs China, Saudis vs Iran, etc. This way, gentiles will be too busy hating one another to focus on what is best for their own nation. When gentiles hate gentiles, Jews can squeeze in between the cracks and manipulate all sides. Consider how American Jews declared New Cold War on Russia while Netanyahu and Jews-in-Russia assured Putin that they are doing their best to improve Russia’s standing in the world. Jews play good cop/bad cop.

Now, gentile peoples can create havoc around the world all on their own without Jews. Indeed, history in all five continents is a testament of how people can be warlike and brutal, and most human conflicts had little or nothing to do with Jews. Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan didn’t invade other peoples at the behest of Jews.
Still, there was a golden opportunity for world peace after the Cold War when the final great ideological/imperial conflict came to an end. There could have been good relations among US, EU, Russia, China, and other parts of the world as nations committed to mutual respect and rational restraint. The golden opportunity was lost because Jews knew that world peace would be 'bad' for the Jews or, more precisely, for the purposes of Jewish Supremacism. (Jews were no longer content with the good life and wanted to rule the world. Jews saw the entire world as a casino that must be controlled by themselves.) There were too many nations in the Middle East that Jews wanted destroyed. Since Jews themselves couldn’t do it, they manipulated American Power to wage Wars for Israel. And when Russia failed to fall completely into the hands of Jewish globalists and when Jews feared that the Russian resistance to Jewish supremacism might spread to EU and even the US, Jews concocted the so-called ‘New Cold War’ against Russia that actually wanted peaceful ties and trade with EU and the US. Jews simply couldn’t stand the idea of white Russian gentiles getting along with white Europeans and white Americans. By turning US and EU against Russia, Jews got to play one side against the other and vice versa.

If most peoples think in terms of their own national sovereignty, they will see no point in supporting Jewish supremacism. Why should they favor the interests of an alien people over their own? (The problem is not Jews per se but Jewish insistence on their supremacist domination of other peoples. Jews denounce gentiles-serving-gentile-interests as 'supremacist', but Jews not only serve their own interests but demand that gentiles serve Jewish interests. That is the essence of supremacism.) So many people are so confused and lost because they’ve been misled by Jews to think globally than nationally. After all, if they can’t be for their own kind, whom should they be for? Individuals have a natural longing to serve something bigger than their lone selves. But if white people have been taught that it’s evil and wrong for them to care about their own identity and serve their own interests, what about their need to serve something bigger than themselves?
This is where Jews step in as consultants to all those confused and alienated whites. Yes, whites are told they must serve something bigger than individual interest, and it happens to be Jewish interests. Or, if fanatical Zionism isn’t your cup of tea, then you must serve Homomania(which is just another way of serving Jewish power since the Homo agenda has been a proxy of Jewish power from day one). So, we have the odd spectacle in the US of White Conservatives worshiping the 2% of the population that is Jewish(even though most Jews despise white conservatives) and of White Liberals worshiping the 2% of the population that is homo(and closely allied with Jewish supremacist power).

But despite all the hysterical euphoria of praising Israel and Homos, the Jewish advice unto white goyim ultimately spirals into more confusion because a people will continue to lose out by serving another people(especially one as contemptuous as the Jews) than by serving their own interests. Imagine what would happen to Jewish power if Jews decided to serve Palestinian, Iranian, Russian, and Anglo interests but never their own. It’d be Game Over for Jews soon enough.

Because whites have been led to believe Jews are so wise and wonderful, they want to believe that the Jewish advice is the best and noblest in the world. In their childlike and sheeplike state, they believe that serving Jews is as good as serving themselves because, in return for their devotion and support, Jews will do what is best for all mankind. Whites would never be so easily hoodwinked by Chinese, Iranians, or Hindus because there is no Taboo that forbids skepticism about them. But the notion of ‘antisemitism’ has made any skepticism or criticism of Jewish power and agenda a Taboo. Any negative view of Jews is deemed a ‘rabid’ and ‘virulent’ ‘canard’. So, when Jews give advice, white people believe it’s their duty to trust and obey, just like Christians are supposed to blindly worship God and Jesus.
But when things keep getting worse as the result of heeding the Jewish advice, a complex is bound to form within white minds. One side of them says they must trust Jews because Jews are so holy & wise, and besides, it’d be ‘antisemitic’ to cast aspersions on Jews. But as the world crumbles around them, there is a growing sense that maybe Jews are not only up to no good but are no good at their very core. Russians sure found out in the 1990s when Jewish advice led to mass poverty and/or mass death for so many people. And people in the EU are beginning to notice that the Jewish push for ‘multi-culturalism’ is leading to their racial and cultural demise. According to Jewish advice, Europeans must import millions more non-whites in order for Europe to ‘survive’. Imagine the loopy logic of this Jewish advice. In order for Europe to survive, Europeans must be invaded and replaced by non-Europeans as ‘New Europeans’. Now, such an advice would sound totally nuts to a sane person, but alas, the Holocaust Cult has instilled white gentiles with mindless Jewish Worship and even more mindless ‘White Guilt’.

It’s no wonder then that Jewish supremacists can use the US & EU to wage Wars for Israel to smash the Muslim World and then steer tons of ‘refugees’(aided by George Soros & his cabal) to flood into Europe. And all those cucked-out Germans think their duty as Europeans is to serve ‘refugees’, Muslims, and Africans on the advice of World Jewry. When Germans and others put the interests of the Other above their own kind, it means White Submissivism to Jewish Supremacism is their main mode of existence.

Nations Can Survive Decadence & Dementia But Cannot Survive 'Demodence' and 'Demomise'

Nations can survive Decadence as all civilizations have cycles of rise and fall. The fall of the old dynasties in Turkey, Iran, and China didn’t end those civilizations as people and culture.
But current Decadence in the West is accompanied with 'Demodence' and 'Demomise', or demise of native populations. There is NO recovery from such disaster. If France becomes Africanized, it is no longer France and will never regain its true identity and heritage. It will forever be neo-savage land of Africans speaking French and colonizing white wombs(infected with jungle fever) to create more black babies who grow up to be ravenous savages. If Australia is repopulated with Hindus, Chinese, Arabs, and Africans, it will no longer be Anglo-Australia, the real Australia.

A nation or community can survive bad(even horrible) ideas or trends. Russia survived communism, even after losing millions of lives. China survived cultural decay, wars, and communism(and other disasters) too. Nevertheless, Russia remained Russian and China remained Chinese throughout the disasters, and they were able to re-emerge on the world stage as sovereign nations.

Globalism is more dangerous than bad ideologies or trends of the past because it uses decadence to weaken the pride and will of a people and then drives a stake through the nation’s weakened heart with demographic invasion and replacement.
To undermine national solidarity based on morality and values, globalism pushes a kind of sacro-decadence that conflates diversionary fun with divine faith. Decadence is no longer something to be tolerated and enjoyed(with guilty pleasure) but the very foundation of New Spirituality. Notice homomania is no longer just street celebrations & colorful parades but the new holy symbols in churches and the new sacred text in schools & libraries. Even the National Church in Washington D.C. hoisted the 'rainbow' flag.

If this madness were just a case of bad ideology or trend, it will blow away in due time. But in the age of globalism where countless peoples are on the move all over the world to invade & plunder wealthier nations, sacro-decadence weakens a people's pride & power to defend their domain and instead strengthens their passion for racial/national suicide as the highest expression of virtue. With debased values, weakened wills, and/or corrupted passions, the native/established peoples increasingly lack the courage and confidence to say NO to the invasion and push back. Worse, their moral vigor, as such may still exist, welcome the invasion and replacement as a spiritual prerogative.

When falsehood is the 'new truth', the most positive & affirmative emotions will honor and serve what is self-destructive while reviling what is most self-protective.

While it would be nice if positive emotions were always on the side of sanity, health, and truth, the problem is emotions always follow the programming of minds & senses. Through indoctrination and iconography, people's minds and senses can be made to affirm the false and insane. And then, their positive emotions flow toward revering those ideas and icons. People have wondered why so many seemingly sane people had positive passions for psychopaths like Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Obama. Are so many people evil or insane? How could they have felt so positive about figures who were so demented?
It was because emotions follow the programming. It's like the positive affections of a dog can go to serve and love the most demented person. Emotions are blind. If a dog is made to believe that such-and-such person is the rightful master, its affections will flow toward that person. Likewise, if the people are made to believe in the 'greatness' or 'holiness' of a certain figure via manipulation of ideas and icons, their emotions will flow that way.
Emotions are 'innocent', earnest, and childlike. So, positive emotions don't automatically choose what is objectively or morally positive, and negative emotions don't automatically reject what is objectively or morally negative. As with dogs(that can be made to love bad people and hate good people), people can be made to associate their positive emotions to what is negative and their negative emotions to what is positive.

Demented ideology of PC and decadent iconography of Pop Culture have brainwashed so many white minds to revile white identity, interests, security, & survival as ugly and pathological while welcoming non-white invasion, moral degeneration, and homomania as the paragons of virtue and redemption.

So, what Western nations face today isn’t just decadence. It is decadence that leads to defenselessness against massive invasion, leading to'demomise' or demographic demise and 'demodence', the decay of an entire people as identity and culture.

In the UK, the BBC now regularly feature blacks and non-whites as British historical figures in movies and series. These aren't just bad ideas and icons but weapons to facilitate the massive invasion of UK by blacks and other non-whites who will turn Great Britain into European Africa, Pakistan, and Arabia.