Covid-19 Crisis has led to Tug-A-Jew Struggle among Wanna-Be-Cucks around the World — Will Anglucks or Anglo-Cucks regain their Status as the Top Cucks of Jewish Supremacism?

Covid-19 Crisis has exposed what the World Power Game is really about. It's a contest among cucks to win the approval of the Jews. In this, Iran is the only true exception. Even China and Russia are in the Cuck-Victory or Cuctory camp. They are trying to win the game of "Jews Favor Us Most".

Anglo Cucks are Anglucks. Chinese Cucks are Chucks. Russian/Moscow Cucks are Moscucks. Hindu Cucks are Hinducks. They are all playing the game of Tug-a-Jew. Jewish Power is like the most awesome bachelor, and the various cuck nations are pleading with Jews to "Marry me, fuc* me, and let me have your baby." It's truly a sorry sight. Among Anglucks, we see such putting-out behavior not only from the usual whores(in the Democratic Party, Republican Party, 'mainstream liberalism', and 'Conservatism Inc.') but from so-called Dissident Rightists like John Derbyshire whose anti-Chinese screed amounts to "We Anglucks sucky sucky you better. Master Jew, come to OUR whore house." How pathetic that these major goy powers/nations are into 'Me So Horny, Me So Horny' mode at the feet of Jewish Power.

Of course, Anglucks have a longer history of cucking to Jews. Indeed, Anglos once had power OVER Jews. They weren't always Anglucks. But what historical ironies. Adolf Hitler and Nazis appealed to Anglos in UK and US for partnership. Northern Anglo whites and Germanics as Fellow Aryans who'd rule the world together. The official narrative says the Anglos, despite being imperialist and all that, said NO to the sinister Darth-Vaderian German offer. "Luke, join the Dark Side." Anglos had supremacist tendencies and had their share of 'racism', but they had a sense of limits and were doing their best to move toward greater justice and liberty for ALL mankind. Anglos said NO to German 'Aryan' supremacism. They sided with pitiable Jews who were being victimized and slaughtered by the Nazi 'Aryan' war-machine that sought to 'conquer the world'. Then, how ironic that the very Anglos who said NO to German supremacism ended up saying YES YES YES to Jewish supremacism? And Jews, the people who've been parading themselves as the primary victims of Racial Supremacist Ideology, are now the biggest practitioners of Racial Supremacist Agenda premised on the vile conviction that any number of goy lives and liberties should be sacrificed on the altar of the Almighty Jew. If millions of Arab lives are destroyed? Who cares? If Iranian women and children are made to suffer? Let them suffer, let them die. If EU is flooded with tons of African and Muslim invaders because Wars for Israel destabilized borders in North Africa and Middle East? Let the whites be invaded and replaced. Besides, Diversity is useful for Jews in playing Divide-and-Rule among goyim. Anglos rejected one supremacist offer(of the Nazis) to end up serving the supremacism of the other(the Jews as main victims of Nazis). Of course, as the Official Victims of Supremacism, Jews get a pass on their own Supremacism. Jewish checks, no matter how costly and ridiculous(or bogus), are written off as Reparations for the Holocaust. It's the Holo-Cost.

As Anglos went from Anglo-Lords or Anglords to Anglucks, they set the template for all of the world. Following World War II, the Anglo World was richest and most powerful. US, Canada, and Australia were in great shape. UK was drained by WWII but less damaged than most major European nations. Also, its empire was still intact. Even with the decline of UK and rise of US, it was Anglo Power just the same as the ruling elites in the US were WASPS and Anglo-Americanized whites. Anglords had the supreme power.
But their Christian Moralism of guilt and redemption gave an opening to Jews. Also, there was an element of naivete and 'innocence' in the American Character owing to the official mythology of America as the Nation of Freedom, Liberty, and Equality that had broken free of old, repressive, and corrupt Europe. As such, Anglo-Americans were more sensitive to criticism of American failures. Still, Anglords would surely have kept the power if not for the presence of Jews who not only took over key industries and institutions in media and academia but used them to bait White Guilt. Also, Jewish Big Think or Propheticism seemed sexy like Ron Jeremy's dong to the Anglos who'd grown accustomed to moderation, pragmatism, empiricism, and restraint. Whether it was the Big Think of Jewish Leftists or Jewish Libertarians(like Ayn Rand), Anglos felt 'liberated' by the sheer excess of Jewish ego, confidence, and pride. (Likewise, black music had a similar effect on whites because blacks held nothing back and drew their musical energies directly from their loins.)

Initially, Jews began to gain influence over Anglo/Americans by intellectual fireworks and moral appeal. Back then, Jews didn't have the power to FORCE Anglos to change their views and values at the drop of a hat. They just seemed to make the stronger or more compelling arguments, made easier by their increasing control of the media and narrative. As such, Anglos who changed their minds in accordance to Jewish appeals were not necessarily Anglucks. But with each passing year, Anglos went more and more from Anglords to Anglucks. The children of WASP parents in elite colleges were trained to regard 'racism' as the worst crime and made to believe Jews are pure as snow in historical innocence. They grew up with Anne Frank as the new madonna and the Holocaust as the new crucifixion. And as Jews grew richer and more powerful, more whites came to realize they can't get anywhere without Jewish support. But it wasn't just the increasing influence but the consecration of Jews as Holy Holocaust Victims that made it nearly impossible to speak honestly about or challenge Jewish Power. Whether it was Democrats or Republicans, their highest concept of Morality and the Good was "We are more supportive of Israel and servile to Jewish interests."
If such dynamics had unfolded in some second-rate nation, it wouldn't have mattered much. But it happened in the US, the richest and most powerful nation on Earth. And the people who cucked to Jews were Anglos, the most dominant people around the world for at least three centuries. So, whatever Anglo-Americans did wasn't just something they did on their own with Jews. As the very national group associated with world dominance for centuries, it had a seismic effect on all the world. If Anglos, the lords of the world, cuck to Jews, it must be the New Standard for all mankind. If lowly Greeks or Mexicans had cucked to Jews but if Anglo-Americans hadn't, things would have been different. But Anglo-Americans were the guys who beat Germany and Japan. They were the guys who contained the awesome Soviet Union in the Cold War. Indeed, they'd achieved the tremendous feat of turning the North American wilderness into a superpower in a historical blip. And yet, these mighty people submitted to Jews and found themselves unable to say NO to Jews on anything. So, the ripple effect of this was HUGE. Furthermore, Anglucks didn't just submit to Jews politically and economically but 'spiritually' and 'morally'. Jews weren't merely giants but holy gods. Jews were might and right. And this holiness was associated with Jewish Victimhood, a Narrative that could be used to hide the extent of Jewish Power. So, the message around the world was 'Jews Rule America and Are Not to Mess With' but also 'You Cannot Call Out on Jewish Power'.

As Anglucks surrendered Moral Legitimacy and Political Power to the Jews, their only hope was as comprador cucks of Jews. Let Jews play first fiddle, but Anglos can at least play second fiddle IF they suck up to Jews. This mentality has seeped so deeply into the American Psyche that even those Anglos and whites who've been persecuted and de-personed by Jews do everything to win back the Jewish Affection(that never really existed in the first place). So, the National Review magazine, which cucks to Neocons, had John Derbyshire purged, but Derbyshire thinks his China-bashing will put him back in good graces with Jews. Alex Jones was de-platformed by Jews, but he pretends as if the 'Chicoms' are behind it. Jared Taylor was taken off Twitter and Paypal by the Jews — and his views are often censored on Youtube — , but his priority is always to suck up to Zionists and censor anyone on his site who calls out on Jewish Power. If Dissident Right Anglos act this way, just imagine how Anglos in Democratic and Republican Parties act. The Joe Bidens and Mitt Romneys of the world. What a pathetic bunch.

Now, why didn't Jews accept the Angluck bargain in good faith? After all, Nazi Germans would have been more than happy to form a partnership with Anglos. Indeed, Germans would have accepted an equal or even an subordinate partnership with Anglos. Germans had no designs on the British Empire. Hitler admired the Anglos and wanted to be on good graces with them. Hitler was a shit in many ways, but he did believe in mutual respect with leaders and nations he admired. We see this between Germany and Italy. Though Hitler's view of Italians wasn't much, he truly admired Mussolini and kept his end of the bargain. He did everything to make the cowardly Italians look good. After the third-rate Greeks whupped fourth-rate Italians, Hitler had Germany take Greece to save Mussolini's face. So, if Anglos had made a deal with Hitler, Hitler would have kept it: Germans and Anglos together as best friends forever.

So, why didn't Jews take this offer from the Anglos: Jewish power and Anglo power together would have been unbeatable. But there was one difference. The factor of ethno-psychology. It all hinged on how Jews saw Anglos and regarded themselves(through the imagined Anglo gaze). If the Nazis regarded Anglos as racial equals and brethren, Jews regarded Anglos as the Goy Other(and felt that Anglos, despite their all-too-sudden sentimentality about Jews, privately regarded Jews as a bunch of nasty 'kikes'). Also, if Nazi Germans regarded Anglos as equal to them in every way — intelligence, ability, vision, talent, looks, etc — , Jews felt both massive inferiority complex and superiority complex vis-a-vis the Anglos. Too many Jews who looked like Anthony Weiner and Woody Allen hated the fact that they were funny-looking compared to Anglos. Even when Anglos didn't make fun of Jews and treated them nice, Jews got into an Edgar-Allan-Poe-like paranoia about what Anglos REALLY think. It's like Woody Allen in the opening of ANNIE HALL saying he heard the guy say 'Jew Eat?' instead of 'Did you eat?' So, as long as Jews co-existed with Anglos, the very reality of Anglo looks was an affront to Jewish self-image, made all the worse by the fact that Jewish Portnoys agreed that Anglo women were preferable to Jewish women in looks, the subject of THE HEARTBREAK KID. As Jewish women rose up the ranks, they brought their own brand of neurosis into the mix from the hurt that they felt over Jewish men and society finding White Women more desirable than Jewish Women.


At the same time, Jews felt superiority complex over Anglos as they couldn't help feeling smarter, more clever, and wittier than the Anglos. Whether Woody Allen vs Anglos in his movies or Frederic Raphael's GLITTERING IMAGES, there is abrasive Jewish arrogance in beating White goyim in the arena of wit, insight, and cunning. So, both the angry inferiority-complex-side and arrogant superiority-complex-side of Jews in relation to Anglos didn't make for a stable partnership. No matter how much Anglos sucked up to them, Jews were offended & belittled by the fact that Anglos were taller & more attractive AND felt contempt & arrogance toward the less intelligent and/or more naive Anglos.
Besides, it must have been a truly piteous sight for Jews to see the once-mighty Anglos grovel at their feet. Here was this race that had conquered and ruled the world. The race that produced Douglas MacArthur and George Patton. But they were now on their knees begging the Jews, "Can I suck your cock? I will swallow." It's impossible to feel any respect for such cucky-wucks. It's one thing for poor folks in some hapless third-rate nation to act thus. But for Anglos, the world conquerors and leaders? And to a bunch of nebbish Jews? (Ethno-psychology matters. If Hitler would have kept his bargain with Anglos, he certainly didn't keep it with Stalin and the Slavs, whom he despised racially and culturally. Had Anglos cut a deal with Hitler, they were on safe ground. But Russians weren't.)

Because Anglos created the New Order, Jews formed a partnership with them, BUT it could not be equal or based on mutual respect/interest. Rather, while Jews increased Jewish Power, Jewish Identity, and Jewish Interests, Anglos were to ever decrease their own. Jews would grow more the Master while Anglos would grow more the Dog. While Jews emphasized Jewish unity among Jews of all nations and classes, they demanded that Anglos totally abandon Anglo/white identity except as a dirty epithet or smear. 'Jewish' is noble, 'White' is awful. Therefore, the Terms of Agreement in the partnership was that (1) Jews keep their identity, interests, & unity, and furthermore, whites support, defend, and honor Jewish identity, interests, & unity (2) White elites denounce white identity, white interests, & white unity, and whites may operate & succeed ONLY AS deracinated individuals IF AND ONLY IF they cuck to Jewish Power, Magic Negro Cult, and Globo-Homo-mania.
In other words, Anglos and whites can still become rich and rise up the ladder BUT only as individuals and as cuckish servants & toadies of Jewish Power and Jewish Supremacism.

And so, Anglords turned into a race of Anglucks. And as Anglo-Americanism was the template of whiteness in the US, whites of all other ethnic groups followed suit. We have Italian-Americans who follow the Angluck model. Rudy Giuliani kisses Zionist ass and wears woman's clothing at globo-homo parades. This means that while rich elite Jews can care for and champion the needs of ALL Jews, white elites could not act for white interests or white solidarity. White elites can keep their elite status ONLY IF they serve Jewish elites who stand for Jewish Unity. So, even as whites did everything to ensure and promote Jewish preservation, power, and glory, Jews did everything to chip away at white power and unity. Paradoxically, the Jewish allowance of white elite success undermined white power/interests even more. Had Jews targeted all whites for collective ruin, then ALL whites would have gotten the message that they are NOTHING in the Jewish Dominated Order. Then, there would have been white unity and resistance as smart whites would have sided with lesser whites against Jews. Jews figured that the best way to undermine white unity is to provide lots of carrots for the best-and-brightest whites who would be showered with prizes and accolades as long as (1) they sought success as atomized individuals (2) praised & revered Jews (3) denounced white identity and white pride in favor of Diversity and Jungle Fever. That way, Jews got to own the best-and-brightest whites who, otherwise, might have sided with the white masses against Jewish Power. The most effective kind of oppression is not to equally oppress all of the Other but to provide goodies to the best-and-brightest among them so that they will work for you than champion and lead their own people. (It's interesting how Jews went from appealing to white vulgar mentality to appealing to white elite mentality. When Jews were on their way up, many non-elite whites cheered the Jews as 'populist' bad boys, as with the Marx Brothers, who gave the Middle Finger to rich white snobs. Of course, the Marx Brothers ridiculed the goy in the street as well as the goy in the Ivory Tower, but the sheer anarchic energy of such Jewish comics was appealing to many whites who felt down and out. Back then, plenty of whites in the South, Midwest, and the West resented the 'Eastern Establishment' of Anglo Brahmins. So, when Jewish comedians and mavericks championed unruly class rebellion, they seemed like heroes of the Common Man. The unwashed goyim had no idea that Jews were mocking Wasp elites so that THEY THE JEWS would take over as the new elites. Once Jews did gain the status as the New Rulers of America, they no longer had use for white American populism. If Marx Brothers and the Three Stooges once used to represent Jewish comedy, Jewish humor was epitomized in the 90s by Jerry Seinfeld whose show appealed to urbane yuppie tastes and went over the heads of the hoi polloi. And then, incredibly enough, Jews even waged War on Humor as comedy and jokes could be used to mock Jewish Power and Supremacy by the likes of Sam Hyde. Of late, Nick Fuentes has used comedy to provoke Jewish Power, and Jews won't have any of it, which is why he was taken off Youtube. And today, Jews appeal to white elites in the denunciation of lowly, crude, and vulgar populism of the white working class, the very opposite of what they'd done with the Marx Brothers.)

Anglos, once the rulers of the world, turned into Anglucks. And the world realized this. They came to understand that the US, the lone superpower, is essentially about White Folks cucking to Jews. Jews are like the gods of politics, and in US as Valhalla, Angluck Warriors worship and sing praises to the Jewish gods. If Anglos and Anglo-Americanized whites, the bulk of the US(as lone superpower) act this way, then the message heard around the world is the formula for global success is to serve the Jews to gain their tolerance, approval, and blessing. (It's like Sollozzo the Turk needed Don Corleone's approval to do business in New York in THE GODFATHER.) And Jews know that the world sees Global Power this way. A people or nation won't rise to great wealth UNLESS they put out to Jews as the global godfather or godpimp. Though Anglos had been much diminished under Jewish Power, the fact is many continue to do well in the New Jewish Order only because they serve the Jews for approval and blessing.

And so, the Angluck Template led to the rise of the Chucks(Chinese Cucks), Moscucks(Moscow Cucks), and Hinducks(Hindu Cucks). Of course, there are many others such as Polucks(Polish Cucks) and Japucks(or Japanese Cucks), but as their nations are second-rate political puppets of the US empire, it doesn't really matter. They have no choice but to be cucks. But China, Russia, and India still have some degree of real sovereignty. They are not part of the US empire and therefore must make an extra effort to win over Jewish Approval and Blessing. They must play the game of Tug-A-Jew.
Of course, they play this game with a certain trepidation. They don't trust the US, and they don't trust Jews. (And they don't want to end up as pathetic as the Anglucks.) At one time, Russians did trust Jews in the 1990s and got burned real bad. Boris Yeltsin and his crew thought being Moscucks would bring many blessings. Invite Jews to fix the Russian economy, and both Jews and Russians would get richer and do well. But what did Jews do? They raped the entire economy and let countless Russians die of despair and drugs. Of course, some Russian elites did get rich by collaborating with Jews, but the Jewish-Russian bargain was like the Jewish-Anglo one. Russians could get ahead as individuals(collaborating with Jews), but they better forget about Russian solidarity or Russian nationalism. But things got so bad that it led to a backlash under Vladimir Putin who rejected the Hyper-Moscuck strategy of the 90s. Russians realized that Jews could never treat Russians on equal terms. Jews saw Russians as either collaborators or cattle. Still, Jewish Power around the world was such that Putin could not drop the Moscuck Strategy completely. Rather, he changed the dial from Hyper-Moscuckery to Moderate-Moscuckery. Of course, for Jewish Supremacists, even this was outrageous. How dare Russia not totally put out to the Jews? Don't these dumb, stupid, drunken Russians know that Anglos, once the mightiest people on Earth, totally cucked to Jews? Then, how dare the Russians not totally cave to Jewish demands? (Ukrainians totally cuck to Jews, and that's really been great!) So, that set of the Jewish War on Russia, but there still hasn't been a Russian War on Jewry because, even as Jews piss on Russia, Putin knows that Russia still needs connections to the Empire of Judea to have a role in the global economy. Putin's partial-cuckery is on display every time he meets with Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel undermines everything Russia tries to do in Syria. Jews in Israel work with Jews in the US to sanction Russia and apply pressure. But Putin has to show his philosemitic credentials by shining Netanyahu's shoes and kissing his arse.

One thing about cuckery is it breeds jealousy. While all cucks are in the same boat of cuckery, they are jealous of the affection or approval that other cucks get. It's like all dogs are dogs but envious of other dogs getting more hugs, pets on the head, or doggy-biscuits from the Master. If you give one dog something, other dogs feel resentful. If you hug one dog, other dogs want their hugs and more. Cucks are like Concubines. If one concubine is favored by the lord, other concubines feel jealous and want to knock her down a few pegs.

And this is why Anglucks, Chucks, Moscucks, Hinducks, and others sometimes go out of their way to show that they are more 'horny' and 'sucky-sucky' with the Jews as top pimp. Part of the reason why Anglucks are so hostile to China and Russia is that they see them as cuck-competitors for Jewish Blessing. "We Anglucks cuck to you Jews most, so please oh please love us most, dear master." In the 90s, the Jewish-Russian Axis became nearly a thing as Jews were totally taking over that country. Also, the Jewish-Chinese Axis began to emerge around the same time as Jewish Globalists figured on totally destroying white unity in the US by having corporate elites hire Chinese and others while dumping on the American working class. As Russian elites and the Chinese had much to gain from this New Order, they cucked to Jewish globalists. Though Anglucks didn't publicly protest this(as they were totally afraid of their Jewish Masters), they were feeling jealous and neglected. Instead of strengthening the Jewish-Anglo partnership, Jews seemed to be forming New Partnerships with other would-be cucks. Israel was building Jewish centers in China. The Jewish-Chinese marriage became a big thing in elite circles. China fawned on Jews, and Jewish Media promoted closer US-China ties in the 1990s and 2000's. Around the same time, Thomas Friedman was traveling in India and promoting the Hindu-Jew or HinJew partnership. Jews seeme to think it'd be a neat idea to replace many white professionals with Hindu ones. Google hired a Hinduck as CEO. Jewish Disney figured on bringing over tons of Hindus to replace white managers and professionals. Anglucks were feeling sad and blue over such developments, but if the Jewish Master wanted it, what could they do?

But the Covid-19 crisis offers an opportunity for the Anglucks to win back the affection of their Master. Even though Jews spearheaded globalism and made all those deals with Chucks and Hinducks, Anglucks don't blame the Jews. Instead, they hope to regain the status as the main cuck-darling of the Jews. So, Anglucks make noises about, "Look Master, Chucks lied and People died. Chucks are bad, so please love us Anglucks, dear master." Hinducks see an opening too. "Oh, Jewish Master, Chucks are bad news, so please send bulk of the global economy our way to India, and we Hinducks will serve you most loyally like that Uncle Dot.com CEO at Google." And I'm sure Chucks will look for some pathetic way to appeal to Jews by sucking up to Israel more, cutting ties with Iran, and collaborating with World Jewry to suppress white identity.

It's all so pitiful. It's time for Russians to stop being Moscucks. Chinese must stop being Chucks, and Indians must stop being Hinducks. Maybe they see themselves as just playing the game, but Jews always win because they got so many cuck-suitors willing to take it up the ass. These nations need to learn to live within their means. Let Anglucks have the Jews. Anglucks may believe their future is bright as the main 'partners' of the awesome Jews, but they are doomed. Even if Jews once again chose Anglucks as their main cuck-allies, they will continue to do everything to reduce whites to a occupied and defeated people who must always take orders from Jews, be demographically replaced by diversity, and be sexually Afro-colonized. If Anglucks are so eager to serve such a master, the world should let them have it.

Why are Americans getting Stupider? What the Jewish-controlled US has in Common with North Korea.

It’s difficult to think of another country more different from the United States than North Korea. United States is big, North Korea is small. United States is rich, North Korea is poor. United States is free and democratic, North Korea is totalitarian and repressive. United States is individualist, North Korea is collectivist. And yet, there are striking, even alarming, similarities between the two nations in the area of political psychology. It goes to show that even a ‘free’, ‘liberal’, and ‘democratic’ order can come under the same kind of controls that curse and bedevil a tyranny modeled on Stalinism and Oriental Despotism.

Why would this be so? It’s because both North Korea and the United States now have in common a kind of infantilization of the masses, quasi-spiritualization of tyrannical & parasitic forces, military muscle-flexing as substitute for genuine moral legitimacy, a politics of fear-mongering & scapegoating, radical witch-hunting hysteria, and the ‘cravenization’ of the managerial elites to the overlords & oligarchs.

Even though North Korea is a closed society of which even experts have limited knowledge, we know that (1) it is ruled by the Kim Clan (2) Kim dynasty isn’t merely dominant but deified and worshiped, therefore making it a ‘spiritual’ as well as political crime to dissent against the Power (3) rational discussion & factual inquiry are suppressed, often banned (4) emotional hysterics are instilled and encouraged among the masses in their support of the Kims (5) all the faults and problems of the system are blamed on OUTSIDE forces that aren’t merely denounced but demonized (6) pageantry and idol-worship dominate ideological ‘thought’ (7) historical victimization is exploited to justify whatever insane policy the regime concocts next, and furthermore, the pathology of self-pity blinds the nation to its own evils (8) there is an exaggerated sense of self-importance.

Now, such faults and problems are to be found in all nations and regimes around the world. It’s like greed and mendacity are a common feature of humanity. The world is not made up of sinners on the one side and saints on the other. All people have the sinner and the saint in them. It’s really a matter of degrees, and North Korea really takes the cake when it comes to political pathology, indeed so much so that many in the West glibly regard themselves in stark opposition to the lunacy that is North Korea.
Yet, even as the two nations are vastly different and there are many areas in which the United States is infinitely superior and more humane than North Korea(and other comparable nations) is, Americans mustn’t be too quick to congratulate themselves, especially given what has happened to America since the end of the Cold War and where it is headed in terms of politics, economics, culture, and demographics. Also, just because a nation happens to be ‘free’ and ‘democratic’ doesn’t mean that liberty and participatory politics are being utilized in the furtherance of freedom and democracy. ‘Freedom’ and ‘democracy’, under clever and sinister manipulation by the powers-that-be, can lead to less freedom and eventually tyranny, indeed where the West seems to be headed these days. (Worse, West may be headed toward civilizational collapse, in which case many Western nations may end up even worse than North Korea a hundred years from now.)

US is a ‘free’ and ‘liberal’ democracy, but a close inspection of the political process(which cannot be divorced from economic and media power) would indicate that the US is really an oligarchy. But in some ways, it is worse than the kind of oligarchy found in Latin American nations. After all, the European-descended elites in Latin America are not deified and ‘sacralized’; they are not beyond criticism and reproach. They remain in power because the brown populations tend to be rather hapless and pathetic, but it is fair game to speak truth to power in Latin America. It is fair to point out that the system isn’t particularly fair or just. The ruling elites, the oligarchs and barons of Latin America, don’t have a moral shield around them.
In contrast, the US is particularly in a precarious situation because the ruling elites, the Jews, have been ‘sacralized’ and near-defied as the Holy Holocaust people. Thus, any criticism of Jewish power(or even the mere notice of Jewish dominance and privilege) can lead to people being smeared and targeted as ‘antisemitic’ or ‘Neo-Nazi’. In this regard, the ruling elites of the US are more like the Kims of North Korea than the tycoons and overlords of Latin America. Indeed, Latin American elites often had to resort to brutal means to suppress dissent and the opposition precisely because they lacked a moral shield to mute criticism against them. In contrast, Jews merely need to use their media monopoly and control of deep state to say ‘Boo!’, and the uppity goyim who happened to displease the Jews, wittingly or not, are forced to grovel and beg forgiveness OR effectively excommunicated and exiled from institutions and industries that matter. What happened to the CNN newsman Rick Sanchez for having noticed Jewish domination of the media? He was blacklisted forever and finally got a gig at RT(Russia Today) because he’s been de-personed from the US media-scape. And what did Chris Christie, the fatso governor of New Jersey, do when he made a remark about the Occupied Territories in the presence of Sheldon Adelson, one of the great globo-Zionist barons of the GOP? It didn’t matter that Christie was praising Jews and Israel when he made the remark. The mere fact that he used the term ‘Occupied Territories’ displeased the Jews, and he was forced to grovel at the feet of a billionaire tycoon. Such behavior would be de rigeur in North Korea, but why do politicians act thus in the ‘liberal’ and ‘free’ United States?

Indeed, even whore politicians in Latin America don’t grovel at the feet of oligarchs in such manner. It’s easy to buy whore politicians in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, as most ‘democratic’ politicians are little more than paid-for-whores. In Kenya, many politicians belong in the pockets of Asian-Indian tycoons. Still, black whore-politicians in Kenya or other Africans don’t grovel before Indians or Chinese. Whore-politicians in Latin America ‘democracies’ will grab the money and do as told, but they don’t look upon their puppet-masters as god-men. It’s all about the money. In contrast, there is such a sickeningly servile deference among American politicians and managerial elites toward the Jewish overlords. It’s not just about the money but a quasi-spiritual fear-and-trembling before the Tribe as though Jews are truly holy and godlike. When Nancy Pelosi says the US will be standing right next to Israel even if the Congress building crumbles to the ground, it’s the sort of nutty sentiment one might expect from the servile dogs of North Korea. Jews are to the US what the Kims are to North Korea. They not only buy up whore-politicians but have the entire goy political(and economic) class looking up to Jews in the way that dogs look up to their masters.
This is truly a new development in American History. After all, even the Founding Fathers and Abraham Lincoln were not beyond criticism. Also, the Anglo-Americans or Wasps, the dominant elites throughout US history up to the end of the Cold War, were never objects of worship. They had much prestige and respect for their power and achievements, but they were not seen as god-men or holy people. They were often regarded with a critical eye, not least by their own kind who, if anything, encouraged more honest criticism of American Elite Power. In contrast, the current ruling elites of Jews are not to be criticized and exposed for what they are.
When humans are ‘sacralized’ and deified, the result is always a form of political nihilism. While we can conceive of a good or perfect god, it’d be foolish to entertain such notions about mankind because humans, neither as individuals nor groups, can be expected to be perfect or even all that good in the area of politics, which has always been a dirty and nasty business, at best a ‘necessary evil’. So, while people may worship whom they deem to be the perfect God, they would be crazy to revere a bunch of people as godlike or near-perfect. Such mind-set would willfully blind them to all the rottenness inherent in the object of their worship. Granted, it’s equally crazy to see only the bad about a certain group — as the Nazis were prone to do with Jews — , but the problem in the Current West is the mindless reverence of Jews that has made so many whites willfully blind to all the evils that Jews do. The psycho-political dynamics isn’t hardly different from what prevailed among Germans under National Socialism, Russians under Bolshevism, and Chinese under Maoism. As the personality cults of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, and Mao Zedong elevated them to demigod status, political morality became a matter of “our sacred leader, right or wrong”, or worse, “our sacred leader, right even when wrong” or “our sacred leader, always right, never wrong.” Thus, it didn’t matter what crazy policy the Great Leader pursued and how many lives were negatively affected; since the leaders were infallible and godlike, whatever they did had to have been good, beyond criticism and reproach, indeed worthy of celebration and praise to high heaven.
Now, one may argue that such cults existed under National Socialism and Communism because they were repressive or totalitarian tyrannies where power was concentrated in the iron fist of the regime. In contrast, liberal democracy, the political system that defines the West, is about free discourse, open criticism, and speaking truth to power. And yet, the deification of Jews(and along with them blacks and homos) indicates that the same dynamics can befall a so-called ‘free democracy’. Why would this be so? Because freedom doesn’t favor or guarantee freedom. If some people use their freedom to amass vast fortunes and attain near-monopolistic powers, they can buy up whore-politicians, gain control of media & academia, and gain dominance in finance. If such a people value their power above all else(even more than the principles of freedom and liberty), they will do whatever means at their disposal to chip away at the foundations of liberal democracy to better serve their tribal supremacism — consider what certain Italian-Americans in the Mafia did with freedom availed to them in the US; they didn't use freedom to serve freedom but used freedom to serve themselves at the expense of the Rule of Law and fair play.
Also, if extra-clever, they will use their power of media and academia to elevate themselves to holy sacred ‘victim group’ status, effectively transforming themselves into mini-jesuses. According to the Shoah Narrative, Six Million Jews Died for White Sins. Thus, Jews are like the Six-Million-Messiah-Men. Jews know that Jewish Supremacism alone will only lead to envy, resentment, fear, and anxiety. And so, they veil their supremacism with holy victimology, just like the Christian West masked so many of its horrors with the myth of the Son of God who died for the sins of mankind. That way, the West could conquer and pillage the world in the name of the Great Redeemer. Still, at least Christians didn’t make themselves into god-men. They were the first to admit that they themselves were not without sin and in need of atonement. In contrast, secular Jews have come to worship themselves as the rightful rulers of the world, and they shield their supremacism with the Anne Frank mask. With such a moral shield, Jews can pretty much do as they please and get away with it.

The nihilism at the center of American Politics is, in that regard, not all that different from the nihilism that defines the Kim Tyranny of North Korea. Even after Jews pushed the Great Replacement, Wars for Israel(that destroyed so many lives), White Death via Opioids, Wall Street robbery, pornification of society, desecration of marriage and Christianity with Globo-Homo-mania, vilification & dehumanization of whites, economic rape of Russia, the maniacal hate campaign against Iran, and the hoax about Russia Collusion, we still live in the same ole USA that sucks up to Jews as the holiest of the holy. Even after Jews dragged Donald Trump through the mud, the pathetic cuck-in-chief does little but praise and serve the Jews and Zionists. Even after Jews had Alex Jones deplatformed, the nutter blames the Chicoms and sucks up to Jews. Even after Jews have done everything to ruin Russia’s economy, Vladimir Putin goes the extra mile to support the Jewish community in Russia and to make nice with Netanyahu(despite Israel’s continued efforts to undermine Russia’s position in Syria). While Russia is relatively freer of Jewish Influence than the US is, it too is under the spell of Jewish Supremacist Power hiding behind the Anne Frank Mask.

Another thing that Jew-run US has in common with North Korea is the scapegoating of the foreigner and outsider. Now, all nations and groups indulge in this, and again, it is a matter of degrees. North Korea is extreme in blaming all its woes on outsiders. While nations like the US and groups like Jews have been especially instrumental in undermining the North Korean economy(along with those of Russia, Iran, Syria, and Venezuela), many of North Korea’s problems are self-made as the regime’s priority isn’t what is good for the nation but what is good for the Kim Clan. But as the Kim Clan is never self-critical and doesn’t allow domestic criticism of its power and policies, the blame must always fall on outsiders.
But we see a similar kind of mindset among Americans, especially ‘conservatives’ though increasingly among ‘liberals’ too — RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA! Why are American ‘conservatives’ so eager to blame America’s problems on foreigners and outsiders? It’s because Jews control the US and made it taboo for white ‘conservatives’ to blame anything on Jews, blacks, homos, and immigrants. (Notice that Jew-run Hollywood allows 'liberal' movies and TV shows where the villains are white American conservatives, but 'conservatives' movies and TV shows must always feature FOREIGN bad guys.) Indeed, American cuckservatives must chant the mantra of ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ or DIOS day in and day out. So, even though over 80% of Jews are Democratic and stridently push anti-white policies — and even though most Jewish ‘conservatives’ are neocons who care about Jewish Power & Israel and merely regard whites as their useful idiot dogs and cattle — , whites can’t say anything about Jews. Why, it’d be ‘antisemitic’, or heretical in the Current Year. Another group that causes tremendous problems in the US are blacks, the champions of criminality and thuggery. But as ‘racism’(a ‘sin’ that pertains mostly to attitudes about blacks) is also taboo, white ‘conservatives’ must keep mum about black problems. Even though over 90% of blacks vote Democratic, white ‘conservatives’ have little to say but 'We love blacks' and ‘Democrats are the real racists’. Cuckservatives say NOTHING of whites victimized by black brutality and merely bleat about how blacks are being done wrong by the Democrats. Supposedly, the reason for high rates of crime in cities like Detroit and Baltimore is because they are ‘socialist’ and run by Democrats. There was a time when Republicans used to make some noise about Family Values and at least stood up to the homo agenda. But once GOP became the party that begs for money from Casino moguls and Wall Street sharks, its morality went soulless libertarian and its revamped notion of ‘family values’ became ‘gay marriage is a conservative value’. Besides, as Jews are holy, whatever they demand must be holy too. Since holy Jews insisted, “Homos are our best buddies”, cuckservatives backed down from pushing back against globo-homo as well. It’s rather like North Koreans not being able to say anything negative or critical about the Kims, the tyrants of the nation. So, just like North Koreans must assuage their frustrations by blaming outsiders and foreigners, American ‘conservatives’ must channel their repressed fury at the Other. For John McCain and John Bolton, it was Evil Russia and Terrible Iran. Never mind Russia and Iran played no part in the demise of White America. If any group should be blamed, it should be Jews and soulless Wasps who pledged their loyalty to Jewish sharks. But no, Jews are holy, and white elites became worthless and craven toadies of Jews. As white goy elites couldn’t blame the domestic enemies & oppressors of the white race and as they didn’t feel like blaming themselves as hapless cucks of Jewish Power, they had to make do with barking at foreign enemies who always happened to be nations and groups either hated by Jews or green-lit by Jews for permissible hatred(as Jews would rather have Americans growl at the Other than at Jews). So, if one bunch of American ‘conservatives’ call for New Cold War with Russia, Russia, Russia, another bunch of American ‘conservatives’ try to blame it all on China. Bolton and McCain foamed at the mouth about Russia and Iran especially, and Donald Trump, Alex Jones, and Tucker Carlson blame most of America’s woes on China. In this, they are hardly better than the sad minions of North Korea who must suck up to the Kim Clan while mindlessly barking at any nation designated for hatred by the regime. Likewise, even though Jews pushed the Russia Collusion Hoax, brought about White Death via opioids, call for the Great Replacement, plan to seize guns, suppress free speech for nationalists, and dehumanize whites in popular culture, there are Jones, Trump, and Carlson praising Israel to high heaven while growling at China as the source of most of America’s problems. (In our crazy times, the very ‘liberals’ who denounce ‘racist, xenophobic, and Islamophobic conservatives’ for scapegoating the Other go out of their way to blame Russia, Russia, Russia for everything. These very ‘liberals’ who are so full of ‘tolerance’ and ‘empathy’ totally looked the other way while the Democrats spread wars and destruction to Middle East, North Africa, and Ukraine. The truly sad thing is so many Americans are utterly unaware of their own hypocrisies.)

Another thing that North Korea and the US have in common is the exaggerated self-image. Now, this is far more comical with North Korea, a third-rate power saber-rattling its ramshackle nuclear program. Also, the Kim Clan is an object of ridicule all over the world, which makes it even funnier for North Korea propaganda to push the cult of personality of the fat loathsome Kim Jong-Un. In contrast, US is the lone superpower, and its might around the world is incontestable(if not invincible). Still, self-image is a relative matter. While a wealthy person has more justification to feel rich than a poor person(for whom such would be delusional and pathetic) does, a millionaire who feels himself a billionaire would also be a fool. Or a billionaire who considers himself a super-billionaire would also be deluded. Worse, if a rich person thinks himself a GOOD person simply because he surrounded himself with yes-men who sing his praises, he would be an idiot. Consider Michael Bloomberg who conflated his vast riches with political prestige and moral legitimacy, only to discover that people saw him for what he is: An unscrupulous oligarch trying to buy himself the presidency.
In a similar vein, while the US is truly the lone superpower, its self-delusions are now downright laughable. According to current American Mythos, the US is an ‘exceptional’ nation, the beacon of freedom, liberty, and human rights around the world. This from a nation that has pornification for pop culture, where 100,000s of people were allowed to die of drug overdose without any concern from elites, where the borders are all but broken, where the elites & ‘sophisticated’ urban dwellers worship globo-homo-mania as the new religion, where antifa thugs are allowed to run riot & randomly attack law-abiding people, where the ideology is policed by green-haired wenches with tattoos & trinkets through their noses, where the tiny Jewish minority controls nearly all media & internet, where the Deep State can get away with a criminal coup attempt against the president, where the foreign policy consists of destroying any nation hated by Jewish Supremacists, and etc. After what the US has done to Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Ukraine, where do these American goons get the idea that the US is a force for good around the world? And where is the Rule of Law when just about the only law that seems to matter is “Is it good for Jews?” Where is human rights in a nation where bakers are destroyed because they won’t make ‘gay wedding cakes’? And what kind of a sane nation conflates marriage with homo fecal penetration and tranny-penis-cutting? What kind of conservative movement has ‘Lady Maga’ for its mascot?

America is rich and powerful, and it will be dominant for the foreseeable future, but its prestige as a world power is a joke. No one respects or trusts America. All nations fear America like people fear gangsters, but there is no real respect. Also, even though most nations dare not say so publicly, they know that US is ruled by the Jewish Cabal, and they look upon White Managerial elites as little more than running dogs of the Jews. White goy elites are to Jews what Japan is to the US. Japan is a whore-geisha to the American Empire, and white goyim are now errand-boys to the Jewish masters. It’s no wonder the likes of John Bolton and John McCain were so eager to act TOUGH. Deep down inside, they know that everyone around the world knows they’re nothing but dogs of their Jewish Masters. Listening to the likes of Bolton, McCain, and Romney is rather like listening to the Kim regime’s minions. And even though Trump made himself out to be a different kind of candidate in 2016, as president he's been the same old same old. A mere dog of Jews. And Trump’s barking at Iran, Venezuela, and China makes him seem tough only to idiot MAGA ‘conservatives’. For much of the world, Trump’s tirades against foreign nations is really a sign of his weakness. After all, his main tormentors have been Jews and the Deep State. It wasn’t Iran that pushed Russia Collusion Hoax. It wasn’t China that got him impeached over Ukraine. It was the Jews, and if Trump were truly tough, he would have taken them on. But he is surrounded by Jewish handlers, and he knows full well that GOP is controlled and owned by the likes of Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer, both globo-homo neocon scum. Jews kick his ass, but he kisses Jewish ass. He’s so weak where it really counts, and so, to burnish his credentials as a Tough Guy, he makes a lot of stupid noises about China and Iran especially and to a lesser extent Venezuela.

But where the US is most like North Korea is in the infantilization of ideology into ‘idology’. Any tyrannical regime fears free thought and free speech above all else. After all, free-thinking people with right of free speech will speak truth to power. They will use reason and facts to expose the problems of the nation under current rulership. Naturally, tyrannical regimes prefer dogma to free thought because dogma is about training minds to believe without thinking. Still, even dogma can be problematic to a regime because it comes with a set of principles and inner logic. For example, communism is about equality and dictatorship of the proletariat. As such, a highly unequal nation that calls itself communist will have many citizens wondering about the contrast between what the official ideology proclaims and what the reality reveals. Therefore, what is most useful to the ruling elites is a mindless worship of certain groups, symbols, and idols/icons as holy, sacred, fantastic, awesome, and super. We see this in the cult of personality around celebrities. The fans just adore the star because he or she is their idol. It didn’t matter that Michael Jackson was surrounded by controversy after controversy. For his many fans, he could do no wrong because... he was Michael Jackson. And even when it was plain as day that Elvis Presley was ruining his health and sanity with drugs, his fans revered him to the day he died, and there have been so many Elvis Impersonators. Bruce Lee met a sordid death with adultery and drugs, but to his legions of fans he is the immortal kung fu master. To the very end of his life, Adolf Hitler was served by Germans who were willing to go to hell and back for the Fuhrer. Unlike ideology, ‘idology’ is truly mindless. It’s an emotional and ‘spiritual’ quality, an intensely primal and subliminal attachment to something or someone as near-sacred.
Over the years, North Korea gave up on all pretenses of ideological principles. The only thing that came to matter was the power of the Kim clan. If Stalin and Mao were still sufficiently ideological not to hand over power to family members, the Kims turned communism into a family affair. Indeed, that is what North Korea is about. It’s not about ideology or nationalism but about Kim dynasticism. To perpetuate this, North Korean political culture got even dumber over the years. If in the past the Kims were revered as the ideal practitioners of Marxism-Leninism with a Korean accent, they are now obeyed and worshiped simply because they’re the Kims.

And yet, we see parallels in the US under Jewish Supremacist rule. If in the past, Jews associated themselves with certain ideologies or principles — socialism, communism, anarchism, libertarianism, free speech absolutism, universal human rights, and etc. — , they are now all about Jews, Jews, Jews. What are all those AIPAC rallies about but OBEY THE JEWS BECAUSE JEWS ARE JEWS AND JEWS ARE HOLY? And why should we hate Russia? Because holy Jews hate Russia. If Jews are holy and if holy Jews hate Russia, it must be holy to hate Russia. Why should we hate Iran? Because holy Jews hate Iran. If Jews are holy and if holy Jews hate Iran, it must be holy to hate Iran. It no longer matters what Jews stand for in terms of ideology. The only thing that matters the idolatry of Jews as Jews. So, even as American ‘conservatives’ claim to oppose liberalism, they suck up to Jewish Liberals. And even as American ‘liberals’ claim to loathe conservatism, they suck up to Jewish Neocons. Jews are holy regardless of party affiliations. We must all serve the Jews. The likes of Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden may say shit about Trump and other such goyim, but they don’t have a negative word for the likes of Sheldon Adelson, just like the likes of Mitt Romney and John Bolton don’t have a bad word for the likes of George Soros. Jews can be ‘left’, ‘right’, ‘Zionist’, or ‘socialist’. It doesn’t matter. What matters is they are Jewish, and that means they are the ‘made men’ of American Power. And as the favored allies of Jews, homos have the same privileges. There used to be some rational argument for ‘gay rights’, but no longer. Now, it’s more like the ‘gay religion’ or ‘gay rites’. We must worship Globo-Homo or Queertianity. Why, look at all those churches with ‘gay’ flags! (Why don’t churches fly the Palestinian flag to show solidarity with the victims of tribal-supremacist Zionism? It goes to show that American Christianity, 'mainline' or 'Evangelical', are mere tools of the Jews. Mainline churches worship globo-homo, the proxy of Jewish Power, and Evangelicals zealously support Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, even Christian ones.) Also, to make sure that Americans grow up worshiping globo-homo, the homo propaganda is pushed full swing onto kids from the youngest age possible. Libraries and schools push for sessions where trannies read to little children. As kids will believe in Santa and the Tooth Fairy, why not get them while they’re young?

Any society that respects reason and facts will not push politics onto kids who are too young for critical thinking. But Jew-run US is all about total mind-control over goyim, and that means indoctrinating and inculcating young ones as soon as possible. It also means the infantilization of adults so that they will respond more with emotions and sensations than intellect and thought. Ideally, adults should take a deep breath, listen to all sides, and critically draw conclusions. But if they did that, they might actually see the Power for what it is and speak truth to power. So, it’s more useful to keep them in an emotional than rational state. That way, they can be manipulated by sounds and images of the Jew-run mass media without their minds serving as a critical shield. There was a time when Jews used to denounce such tactics as ‘fascist’ and ‘irrational’. Back then, Jews argued that, whereas socialism and liberalism were rationalist or scientific, fascism was grounded in the irrational, sensual, and atavistic. After all, what mattered most in National Socialist Germany was not any consistent set of ideological principles but the sense that FUHRER KNOWS BEST. But that was then, this is now. With near-total monopoly of mass media, entertainment, advertising, deep state propaganda, and finance, Jews are now in the position to control all images and sounds. So, just by associating homosexuality with the ‘rainbow’ and spreading the 'iconic' image far and wide, Jews managed to persuade so many infantilized Americans that ‘gay’ is not only the New Normal but the New Sacred. With endless conflation of US flag with the Israeli flag at political rallies and news propaganda, Jews have convinced countless Americans that Zionism is as American as Apple Pie. The globo-homo pageantry in the US is not unlike the obnoxious parades in North Korea. They are both devised to override reason & mind and overwhelm people with the sheer power of spectacle, what Chris Hedges calls the Empire of Illusion(though he too is under the globo-homo and Sacred Negro spell).

It is for this reason that Americans need to stop taking things for granted. It’s true that there’s a lot of freedom in the US, and this freedom can be used for much good. But the fact is Jews used their own freedom, intelligence, cunning, and tribal supremacism to create a new order that, day in and day out, chips away at American freedoms, liberty, faculties of reason & thought, and virtues of honesty, courage, & integrity. Just like the Nazis used democratic freedoms to gain power only to do away with democracy, Jews have used freedom to gain power to undo the freedom of the goyim. One saving grace of the Nazis was they were, sooner than later, honest about what their goals were. It wasn’t long before Hitler sneered at democracy and ruled as supremacist fuhrer.
In contrast, Jews are far more insidious because they mean to do away with democracy and reduce American goyim to the status of Palestinians in the West Bank. Unlike honest Nazis who had no use for Free Speech, Jews fool people with mendacity such as “We believe in free speech but not hate speech”, with ‘hate’ to be determined by Jewish groups. In other words, Zionism that destroyed the Palestinians isn’t ‘hate speech’. Jewish agenda of the Great Replacement and White Nakba isn’t ‘hate speech’. However, white people who want to preserve the geographic and demographic integrity of their nations must be shut down for ‘hate speech’. Jewish hatred against Russia, Iran, Palestinians, and white Christians isn’t ‘hate’, but anyone who notices and calls out Jewish Power for what it is is deemed as ‘hateful’ and must be shut down.
And Jews will say they don’t want to take away our guns. Oh no, we can keep guns to hunt for ducks and deer. We only need to hand over guns that are designed to fight tyranny. Now, was the Second Amendment about hunting ducks and squirrels? Or was it about the right to bear arms to protect oneself and one’s loved ones from tyranny? By letting people own guns meant to shoot ducks but taking away guns meant to fight tyranny, Jews pretend they respect the Second Amendment. Only dummies would trust such weasels. US is still a democracy that is far far freer than North Korea, but under Jewish Supremacist control, freedom and liberty are being chipped away for white goyim on a daily basis. White people need to wake up. If the fate of White America is the Californization of America, then the fate of whites will be worse than North Korea. Cult of Personality is bad enough, but the Cult of Ethnicity(around Jews) is downright deadly. After all, even the biggest tyrants eventually die, but a Tribe can stick around forever. Jews are not gods.

PMB Factor or Why Jewish Psychology Makes It Nearly Impossible for Non-Jews to Co-Exist Alongside Jews in Good Faith. PMB = Pedestal, Mirror, and Buttplug. GOMB or Get Off My Back, a Necessary Message to Jews from Whites.

It should be obvious by now to all honest and sensible people that Jews are a deeply problematic people. Now, all peoples are problematic because life itself is problematic, a matter of chaos, confusion, struggle, and survival. Just like all organisms have developed their own specialties to gain an edge in their niche, every human group has had to be more than 'nice' and kind to survive in what has mostly been a harsh world. Still, just like some organisms are more threatening than others, certain human groups are more difficult than others. African honey bees, for instance, are far more aggressive than European honey bees. African elephants are more aggressive and dangerous than Asian elephants. Weasels are feistier animals than muskrats. Some snakes are venomous, many are not. Dragonflies and butterflies are mild compared to hornets. Among dogs, some breeds are more dangerous than others. Among cats, orange tabbies tend to be more aggressive than long-haired black cats. Then, it shouldn't surprise us to realize that some human groups are more problematic than others. This is largely a matter of personality but also linked to levels of intelligence, aggression, strength, neurosis, and/or psychopathy. It also has to do with general egotism within the group.

Two racial/ethnic groups that are most problematic are Jews and blacks. To be more specific, it's the Ashkenazi Jews, ones who are half-European, who are more problematic than other kinds of Jews. Not only do they have problematic personalities but they have advantages and deficiencies that drive many of their members half-mad. Jews are rightly seen as pushy, feisty, and weaselly, but the problem is compounded by the fact that they're more intelligent and less attractive. (Being more intelligent, Jews think they should rule the world but resent the fact that too many goyim regard them to be unattractive and unappealing.) Blacks are rightly seen as loud, crude, and obnoxious, but things are made worse by the fact that they are tougher and less intelligent. (Being tougher and louder, blacks think they should rule the world but resent the fact that their limited IQ prevents them from rising to the top of everything.) And then, there is the matter of egotism that runs wild in both communities that do not lack for know-it-all bigmouths. The egotism also blinds many Jews and blacks to their shortcomings and failings.

In a way, Jews and blacks are mirror-opposites of one another, and in a hypothetical world composed of only Jews and blacks, they would not get along at all. Blacks will try to beat up Jews and rob/rape them, and Jews will use their wits to devise means and ways to enslave and even exterminate blacks. But because both groups rely so much on parasitism on Whitey as the commonly shared host, they've developed a symbiotic relationship. Also, having developed in close proximity with whites, both groups have suffered under whites and gained so much from the complex relationship. Consider what blacks gained under other blacks or under Arabs compared to what they gained under whites. Consider what Jews gained under/with Arabs or other-non-whites to what they gained under/with/over whites, especially Northern European whites.
Indeed, Jewish Global Power is inconceivable without its hooks deep into Anglos and Germanics. While Jews gained great advantages all throughout Europe and Middle East, their power was always limited within the bounds of ability of the host. In other words, while Jews in the Ottoman Empire did better than many groups, they could not surmount the limitations of Turkish civilization. Same goes for Jews in Russia. Jews could rise to the top in Russia, especially in the early stages of Bolshevism, but their worldwide influence was hampered by the problems of Russian national character(and failings of communism, of course). Jews gained a great deal in Italy and France, but both nations were surpassed by Anglo and Germanic nations that really came to define the future of the West. It's like a rider, no matter how talented, is only as good as the horse he is riding. If the horse is weak, no amount of experience and knowledge on his part can turn it into a great horse. Worse, if he has no emotional or moral connection to the horse, he may decide to exploit and abuse it for all its worth and dispose of it sooner than later. Jews understood that the strongest horses in the West were Anglo and Germanic. It was the UK, Germany, and the US. German Jews gained more than all other Jews with the exception of those in the UK and US. This is why Jews reacted to badly to National Socialist Germany's rejection of World Jewry. Would Jews have reacted so violently to a lesser nation saying NO to Jews? After the creation of Israel, many Arab nations expelled their Jews, but World Jewry didn't mind at all. They were happy to have those Jews come to Israel. Furthermore, they didn't see it as a great loss because Jews in Arab nations wouldn't have amounted to much because Arabs could never amount to much. So, Jews in Arab nations were atop weak horses. Jews see goyim as in terms of strong horses or weak horses. That's the esoteric meaning behind Steven Spielberg's WAR HORSE.

How Jews see the white race.

Just like Jews know that blacks are the superpowers in sports, and therefore, Jewish-owned teams in NBA and NFL must recruit top blacks to have championship teams, they know that Northern Europeans, especially Anglos and Germanics, are the most formidable civilization-builders, nation-enrichers, and imperial managers. Thus, Jewish Power relies on access to Anglo and Germanic nations. This is why Jews fear the rise of white identity and white interests among Anglos and Germanics. Even though Nazism turned out to be evil and monstrous, it had many positive sides as well, and one was the theme of liberation and emancipation(from maniacal Jewish control) before the movement turned into one of enslavement and extermination of the peoples of other nations. Before National Socialism went off the rails as Germano-Supremacist Imperialism, its main appeal was the hope of national liberation from World Jewry who, during the Weimar Years, exploited and debauched the German nation. If Adolf Hitler had the sense of limits of Kemal Ataturk or Vladimir Putin, he would have been one of the greatest men of the 20th century, indeed in all of European history. But he betrayed the initial hopes of National Socialism by igniting wars to conquer and exploit other peoples. But then, one problem of National Socialism was it was a radical Germanic version of Jewishness. In the fight against the Jews, Germany would use many of their tactics.

Anyway, the reason why Jews reacted so hysterically to the rise of National Socialism was because they regarded Germany as one of their prize horses. If a weak horse throws off the rider and runs away, it's no great loss. But if a strong prize horse throws off the rider and flees, it's a huge loss. It's the difference between a fisherman losing a sardine and losing a marlin. It's like there's a big difference between losing a plain lover and a beautiful lover. Now, if Jews have such problems with Germans and Anglos, why don't they just leave and go live with other peoples? The thing is, despite the problems, Jews know deep down inside that Jewish Power could only have risen to global greatness atop the backs of Anglo and Germanic prowess. It's like a Jewish owner of the NBA or NFL cannot hope to win the championship without black players. If blacks are the prize horses of Jews in American sports, whites folks(esp Anglos and Germanics) are their prize horses in the global struggle for hegemony. This is why Jews fear the awakening of white consciousness that wants to be free of the JSP(or Jewish Supremacist Power) on its back. When Jews rant about 'white supremacy', it is pure projection because what they're really about is ensuring White Submissivism to Jewish Supremacism. What Jews fear most is White National Liberation and White Global Liberation. White Liberation will save not only the white race but the whole world that is being trampled and destroyed(militarily and immorally) by the Jewish rider atop the white horse. Just consider Libya and Syria under the hoofs of the white horse ridden by JSP. White Liberation will not only save whites from vicious Jews but will spare the whole world from the misuse of the white horse in the hands of Jews. White people must stop being horses of the Jews and become human again. White people must tell the JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power, "Get Off My Back!" It isn't right for Jews to use white folks as their prize horse and war horse. GOMB or GET OFF MY BACK must be the mindset of white folks when it comes to Jewish Power.

Now, the question of why Jews are so difficult. The main reason is the PMB Factor, or Pedestal-Mirror-Buttplug Factor. It is why no amount of goodwill and kindly gestures on the part of whites is likely to change the atrocious Way of the Jew. Many white people believe that Jews will reciprocate in kind if whites treat them real nice. The thinking is that white Christians had wronged Jews for many centuries and then there was the Shoah, and that's why Jews are still overly sensitive, suspicious, and a bit paranoid. Therefore, if whites change their ways and shower Jews with love and kindness, Jews will eventually mellow out and learn to love whites as well.
Granted, there are some whites who are slavish to Jews out of sheer awe. This awe could be religious, as with Christian Zionists who believe Jews are the Chosen of God, and therefore, those who suck up to Jews shall be blessed while those who mistreat Jews will be condemned. Well, whites have been sucking up to Jews since the end of World War II, and what has been the result for the West? Rise of Sodomania as the new faith, anti-white dehumanization, monstrous wars for Israel, and massive demographic replacement.
Now, these Christian Zionists may feel more fortunate than Arabs and Muslims whose worlds have been torn asunder in recent years. They may feel whites are better off than Arabs because whites suck up to Jews whereas Arabs give the middle finger to Jews. God rewards whites, punishes Arabs. But until late modern history, Arabs had been kinder to Jews, but it was the 'antisemitic' white world that rose to greatness. And the reason why Arab nations have been smashed in recent years is because venal Jews have exploited the power of the white horse to trample on other nations. Even though white nations don't lay in ruins like Arab nations, their fate will be far worse than that of Syria or Iraq in years to come because Jews are pushing for mass Afro-Islamic invasion of Europe. But because Christian Zionists are so in awe of Jews, they don't have the wherewithal to speak the truth and name the Beast.
But not everyone in awe of the Jews is a Christian Zionist. Plenty of them are libertarians, materialists, and status-seekers who naturally look up to whomever happens to be the richest and most powerful. These cuck-collaborators will betray anything and even sell their mothers down the river for their slice of the pie. They are like Ned Beatty in SUPERMAN angling for a piece of California as 'Otisberg'. Indeed, what is a political libertarian but someone who worships the rich and powerful as the Best Individuals? While social libertarians are mainly concerned with freedom to indulge in sex & drugs, political libertarianism is all about sucking up to money. Its archetypal practitioner is the cucky-wuck Paul Ryan who bows down before the JSP(Jewish Supremacist Power) and kisses its ass because he is so in awe of Jewish money and power. As its pet, he gets doggy biscuits for which he is oh so grateful. Most college-Republican organizations are grooming centers for political libertarians whose main aspiration is to be useful for Jewish-Power-and-Wealth that they hold in awe. If the richest and most powerful people in the US were Iranian-Americans and not Jews, these cucky-wuck libertarians would prostrate themselves at the feet of globalist Iranian power.

Anyway, what Christian Zionists and Political Libertarians have in common is the faith that if white folks are ever-so-nice to Jews, Jews will mellow out and pay back the love and affection. This is where both groups are wrong because they fail to understand the Jewish Bio-Cultural Character. The truth is it's highly unlikely that Jews will act in good faith because of the PMB or Pedestal-Mirror-Buttplug Factor. What is meant by the Pedestal. It refers to higher Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence. Even though many Jews deny it, they privately believe their own kind to be smarter than the dimwitted, hapless, and/or one-dimensional goyim. So, Jews place themselves upon the pedestal as the superior race, indeed the master race. Sure, Jews always use such terms in relation to Nazis & 'white supremacists' and pretend as though they themselves are for equality and justice. For example, Jews often excoriate white people for not being 'welcoming' or 'inclusive' enough to the non-white hoi polloi around the world. Thus, one might get the impression that white people want to preserve their 'white privilege', whereas Jews want to share their goodies with all the world. But this is bogus for two reasons. For starters, while one can make a powerful case that white people should not invade and rule over non-white folks — that would indeed be a case of White Privilege — , it's absurd to argue that white people must share their own homelands with all the world. No civilization can maintain itself with open borders, aka Open Invasion. Indeed, Jews themselves have ensured that only Jews get to immigrate to Israel. Jewish tightly guard their own Jewish state while offering up white-majority nations to the world; Jews are being 'generous' with what doesn't even belong to them; imagine someone feigning 'generosity' with YOUR money. Anyway, Jews know full well that if any bunch of people can move to Israel, it will lose its majority-Jewish demography sooner than later. True White Privilege would be a matter of whites having their way in non-white lands. In contrast, whites defending their own homelands and nations is NOT any kind of 'privilege'. It is a duty, and it should be called White Duty, or White Priority. After all, it must be the duty and priority of every people to guard and defend their own homeland, especially if it's deeply ancestral. So, when Jews smear White Duty and White Priority(of defending and preserving white nations) as 'white privilege'(or even 'white supremacy'), it is a dirty trick.

Jerry Nadler the vile and vicious Jew 

Jewish BS is bogus for another reason. Increased Diversity doesn't lead to greater equality but greater inequality, what with Jews getting richer over the rest. First, how can all the diverse immigrant-invaders compete with Jews who are not only more intelligent but so well-connected? Also, the Jewish lie of promised equality should be obvious to anyone, especially given how Jewish Power has rigged the American System to favor Jews uber alles. If Jews and their allies were really into equal justice, would they be insisting that the US must regard Israel as its closest ally while turning a blind eye to the plight of Palestinians? Furthermore, Diversity makes Jews(and their globalist allies) even richer because it undermines the national middle class & working class. So, while wages drop for the white middle/working classes, the profits rise for the upper-crust made of Jews and other globalists. And of course, Jewish Power grows ever more powerful under the Diversity regimen because the diverse groups of goyim simply can't get their act together to form an effective coalition against Jewish Power. Not only do the Jewish Media and Jewish-paid whore-politicians pit the various goy groups against one another(whereas 'leftist' and 'rightist' Jews work as a team) but the elites of goy groups are vetted and paid for by the Jewish oligarchs who own them like so many nickels and dimes in their pockets. So, whether the politicians or 'leaders' are whites like Paul Ryan or Lindsey Graham OR blacks like Al Sharpton or Barack Obama, all they ever really do is suck up to Jews. It's rather remarkable in the case of Sharpton because he once used to be a tireless Jew-baiter. But Jewish Money goes a long way, and the rambunctious jive-ass bunny has been sucking up to Jews over the years.

Anyway, not only are Ashkenazi Jews possessed of higher intelligence but they know it. Therefore, they regard non-Jews as inferiors or untermensch who must serve the smarter Jews. Jewish attitude is much like the pig attitude in George Orwell's ANIMAL FARM, which today is most relevant as a HBD(Human Bio-Diversity) allegory. It's made more problematic due to the Jewish Covenant-mentality. If Jews were mainly libertarian, their sense of superiority would mostly be individualistic, i.e. they'd believe only the smart Jewish individuals deserve all the money and privilege they got. But because of the tribal Covenant-mentality, Jews think that they, as a group, should rule over other peoples. While white libertarian elites will side with smart and/or rich non-whites against non-smart and/or non-rich whites, Jewish 'covenantarian' elites will primarily side with even lesser Jews even against white elites who are the socio-economic peers.
It's been said Episcopalians are just as smart as Jews, even a bit smarter. Then, why did Jews come out on top over Wasp Episcopalians? It's because Jews not only used their superior IQ in individual terms but drew strength from their sense of tribal unity and destiny, whereas Episcopalians came around to thinking only in terms of atomized individualism or collective universalism. People who act merely as individuals may gain great wealth, but they cannot amass power as a group. As for those who seek to include all of humanity in their tent, they end up with a morass of deracination, confusion, and chaos. 'Rightist' Wasps only thought in terms of 'me, me, me', and 'leftist' Wasps thought only in terms of 'world, world, world', encompassing all of humanity. Both sides lost out to Jews who, even as they've exploited the advantages of individualism and universalism, opted for 'we, us, ours' as their central mindset. So, if one bunch of Wasps veered off into one direction while another bunch of Wasps veered off into the other direction, Jews remained on track to push their ethnocentric agenda. Jews used individualism to the extent that highly talented Jewish individuals came to amass great fortunes. Jews also used universalism to the extent of persuading white/goy nations to open up to the entire world in the name of shared humanity, and such open vulnerability allowed Jewish power and wealth to penetrate so many nations and sink its hooks into them. Jews regard individualism and universalism as mere tools, whereas so many goyim have been 'intellectually' hoodwinked into accepting them as the core tenet of existence and justice. What really animates Jews is their form of ethno-spiritual tribalism that might be called 'covenantarianism'. Ideology is like air, identity is like matter. While all people need some degree of ideology(or beliefs based on creed), it is too thin as a civilizational core to sustain them through history. It is identity(or one's sense of belonging based on breed) that wins in the long run. A people must be careful not to embrace too strongly an ideology that undermines their sense of identity. Also, while small identities may unite with other identities of similar race-and-culture to form a bigger and stronger identity, it is game over if a people allow their identities to be diluted, erased, and even replaced by others. When similar identities unite, it is like flames coming together to build a bigger flame. When certain identities are overwhelmed by very different and even hostile identities, it's like flames being put out by fire.

Anyway, white people must understand that Jews will never regard them as equals because Jews believe themselves to be more intelligent and holier in the eyes of God(or History). In a way, modern Jewish identity might be called Achievement-Identity, or Identity-of-Pride in having produced so many geniuses, neo-prophets, artists, business titans, and etc. The New Republic, over several decades, was like the journal of Jewish Achievement Identitarianism. White people mustn't expect to be treated as equals by such a people. Jews feel entitled under the eyes of God and/or History to rule over goyim, and white people are their prize horse. Jews value whites as property, not as humanity. Whites are good in the eyes of Jews AS LONG AS they serve Jews. Now, some white people may figure that Jews will treat them nice IF whites do indeed honor and serve Jews as the superior race. Just like a master treats a dog kindly, maybe the Jewish Master will treat the White Dog nicely if the latter dutifully does the bidding of the Jews, fetch, roll over, and wag its tail. Such an attitude is self-debasing but also delusional. White cuckery doesn't fill the Jewish heart with gratitude but contempt. Upon seeing the once great race debasing itself at their feet, Jews feel even more contempt and just want to spit on white servility even as they demand it. Jews may gauge and value white cuckery for what it's worth in political and economic terms, but they feel ZERO RESPECT for it.

Another reason why Jews can't be expected to have kindly attitude toward white goyim is the Mirror Factor. If the Pedestal Factor instills Jews with Superiority Complex, the Mirror Factor imbues them with Inferiority Complex. Everyday, when Jews like Anthony Weiner wake up in the morning and look in the mirror, they see a funny-looking Jew staring back. Now, there are many good-looking Jews, and I don't necessarily mean Jews with substantial European blood. There are Semitic-looking Jews who are handsome in their own way, just as it's true of Arabs. But as Jewish evolution favored brains, money, zealotry(which went from spiritual to ideological in the 19th century), and pushiness above all other considerations, it didn't favor the traits of beauty. Among European noblemen, there was the dream of the handsome prince marrying the beautiful princess and having many good-looking kids together. Among Jews, the main consideration in marriage was money and/or mind. As such, many Jews ended up looking nerdoidean or haggly-waggly. Now, some Jews have a sense of humor and don't mind other races being better-looking. But many Jews, especially because of the Pedestal Factor, have been deeply resentful over the fact that some races, especially the 'Aryans', are generally more attractive than Jews. I mean, how did that happen? If Jews got the Covenant with God, shouldn't they be the fairest race?

In the past, white 'Anti-Semites' made a big deal of Jewish looks, especially with caricatures with hooked noses and sloping foreheads. But then, out of sensitivity over Shoah, fear of Jewish power, and/or influence of Jewish media, most whites decided they must be effusively nice to Jews. Over time, the only people commenting negatively about Jewish looks became Jewish comedians. Consider how Woody Allen beds only 'Aryan' women in STARDUST MEMORIES and then mocks ugly Jewish women. White people decided to remain mum about Jewish looks and, if anything, cheered white/Jewish sexual pairings.

Now, did such massive shift in goy attitude lead to Jews finally developing nice and kindly thoughts about whites? No. The fact is no matter how much whites praise, honor, and even adore Jews, Jews wake up every morning, look in the mirror, and feel like the wicked queen in SNOW WHITE. "Mirror, mirror on the wall, why does staring at myself make me run to the Wailing Wall?" Remember Cinderella was nice to her ugly 'sisters', but it was to no avail. The fact is the ugly sisters continued to hate her because she was beautiful while they were not. Indeed, their hostility toward Cinderella was compounded by the fact that she was their social inferior. Why should the inferior have the superior looks? Likewise, Jews, especially the women, wonder why the lowly goyesses should have the better looks? It fills them with envy, resentment, and even hatred. If Jewish men are eager to get their hands on blonde 'shikses', Jewish women want to carry out 'beauticide' by encouraging white women to mate with black men. Then, the kids that incubate in white wombs will have nappy hair, broad noses, and fat lips. Thus, 'Aryan' beauty will be destroyed, and then, even Jewish women will look better than the mulatto-ized white race. Now, of course, most white people aren't all that good-looking, but when it comes to beauty, people tend to think of the cream of the crop of any race, and justifiably or not, white beauty has become the World Standard. For that reason, the Mirror Factor will make Jews feel hatred toward the white race in the foreseeable future.

Finally, there is the Buttplug Factor. Ever notice that Jews have some of the worst personalities in the world? They really take the cake when it comes to being a**holes. One might say they act like they got buttplugs up their bungs. Jews are irritating and irritable. Now, Jewish comedians made this aspect of their ethno-cultural personality somewhat endearing through the use of humor. Who hasn't laughed at Don Rickles and Rodney Dangerfield? Or at Woody Allen and Mel Brooks? And yet, just like the use of 'camp' has really been a crutch for nasty, vicious, and narcissistic homos, Jewish humor is often the velvet glove that conceals a tight wound-up fist. Indeed, humor is partly therapeutic to Jews because if they didn't learn to laugh, they would hyperventilate and blow up with neurosis, hostility, and biliousness. It's like the Marx Brothers. They drive everyone and themselves crazy. If not for the humor as safety-valve, they'd probably go totally nuts and turn half of humanity into raving petite-hitlers or 'petitlers'.

Now, one may wonder how Jews developed the Buttplug Personality, and it probably has to do with their history of Rabbinical studies and middleman/merchant practices. To be a successful religious scholar, Jews had to verbally out-argue others, often over hair-splitting matters. And to be successful as businessmen, Jews had to be haggly and contentious. And so, Jews developed the kind of personality that many goyim might find to be unappealing, hostile, ugly, and even offensive. Just like some organisms evolved to be especially aggressive and problematic, the Jewish personality developed to cause a lot of problems. And yet, in its tireless energy, it has also been the source of many great achievements by Jews. Generally, greatness is the product of extreme, not mild, personalities. Richard Wagner and Ludwig van Beethoven were 'Aryans', not Jews, but both had very difficult and demanding personalities.

Anyway, the problem with Jews is with the sum of the three factors: Pedestal, Mirror, and Buttplug. After all, a people can be pretty intelligent and not be so unpleasant. A people can be plain-looking and even ugly and not so destructive. Australian Aborigines are considered to be on the 'ugly' side, but they are causing problems around the world. And people can have temperamental or nasty personalities and be limited in the harm they do. Greeks and Southern Italians have been known to be hot-headed and confrontational, but they don't endanger the world. But because of Jewish intelligence amasses great power and gives vent to Jewish resentments, the combination of ability and hostility can do great harm to the world.
Indeed, why was Nazi Germany so dangerous? There was the combination of awesome German talent and the pathology of the ruling elites headed by unstable Adolf Hitler. Because Jews gain so much with their intelligence and ability(and feel great arrogance toward goyim due to their tribal Covenant with God and History), there is a lot of firepower behind resentments of Jewish Inferiority Complex and the temper tantrums of Jewish Irascibility. Indeed, one reason why Jews hate Donald Trump so much is he has his own kind of 'chutzpah', which makes him go off script and howl like a wolf than bark like a dog at the behest of the master. Jewish intelligence enables Jewish hostility, and Jewish hostility fuels Jewish intelligence. It is a venomous combination, and one needs to be cold-eyed and clear-headed about the Jewish character as we move into the future where Jewish Power and Wealth will keep expanding. When faced with such cohabitant, competitor, or enemy, one must NOT give into naivete, sentimentality, or wishful thinking. One must know the truth. You must know your Jew.