Beware of the J-Ray or the Jew-Ray of the Mass Electronic Media — J-Ray enables the Gay-Ray — The Need for White Light and Right Light — The Jewish Hustle in the Takeover of Goy Mass Media and Monopolization of High-Tech

God and Light

Prometheus and Fire

Since the beginning of time, mankind has been fascinated with the Light. Egyptians worshiped the Sun god. The Sun is central to Japanese mythology. Indeed, it’s difficult to think of a people or culture, ancient-medieval-modern, that hasn’t been profoundly inspired by the Sun in art, mythology, and science. Before there was a division of astronomy and astrology, two were one and the same. Astronomy moved from geocentrism to heliocentrism. And astrology has strange relationship with the Sun. Without the Sun, there would be no life on earth, no humans to gaze at the sky and read the stars. But then, the stars are visible only to the side of the Earth turned away from the Sun. The effect of the Sun from dawn to dusk is not unlike the effect of monotheism. The Sun is so bright and dominant that every last vestige of the starry sky vanishes soon after sunrise. The impact of the rise of universal-monotheism(derived from Judaism), especially of Christianity and Islam, has had a similar effect on the spiritual imagination of humanity around the world. Across Europe and Middle East(as well as what became ‘Latin America’), so much of pagan cultures and gods has been wiped out. But just as stars always return in the night to the side of the Earth that is asleep, perhaps there was something to what Carl Jung said about how the pagan gods and spirits are still within our buried psyches. Though vanquished from the conscious mind by the coming of the One God, they lingered in the hidden corners of the mind, re-emerging at times to inspire creativity and vision, as during the Renaissance and the Romantic Era. It’s like what Merlin says in EXCALIBUR: "The days of our kind are numberèd. The one God comes to drive out the many gods. The spirits of wood and stream grow silent. It's the way of things. Yes... it's a time for men, and their ways." And then later... "You(Arthur) brought me back... Back to where you are now. In the land of dreams."


Just like there will always be nights brimming with stars, there will always be an unconscious realm independent of conscious will & knowledge; and in this world of dreams, the dead, exiled, or forsaken gods whisper in our ears once again. Some people partake of prayer, meditation, or, exorcism to purge this deeper realm of the mind as a kind of ‘hell’ inhabited with demon spirits, i.e. apparently, it wasn’t enough to slay the pagan gods and hurl them into the dark pits of one's soul; the dark areas of one's soul must be scoured of the every last trace of paganism or ‘demonism’, not unlike what a doctor does with radiation and chemotherapy to destroy as many cancer cells as possible. But what may be deemed as cancerous or wicked by some is the very stuff of creativity, vision, poetry, and imagination to others. Indeed, is it an accident that the three great creative eras of the West since the Fall of Rome had to do with either the re-emergence of paganism and/or the fading of monotheism’s grip on the culture? Renaissance, Romanticism, and Modernism. Monotheism has done wonders for prophets, but polytheism or paganism has been more friendly to poets. And yet, oddly enough, the rise of Modernism, though seemingly most at odds with Monotheism, eventually led to a kind of neo-monotheism or secular-monotheism. One reason is Judeo-Christo-Islam and Science/Math have one thing in common in seeking the one-and-only truth. Monotheism requires one to believe that God is the only True God. If other gods are also valid, then Monotheism has no legitimacy. Likewise, science seeks the one truth. Unless there is a single set of universal laws of nature that governs the cosmos, science becomes pointless. While there have been many competing scientific hypotheses, they have all sought to discover which one is true, thereby proving all others false. For example, the Lamarckian hypothesis lost out to the Darwinian one, and certain elements of Darwinism have been discarded over the years by theories backed with more advanced experimentation. Because science has gained such prestige, even non-scientific fields have sought to imitate scientific methodology and terminology, resulting in an intellectual phenomenon called ‘scientism’, which isn’t really science but has its outward appearance. (The most dangerous quacks speak the language of medicine.) Then, it is not surprising that everyone from Karl Marx to Josef Stalin to Sigmund Freud to Carl Jung to Herbert Spencer to Adolf Hitler all claimed to speak in 'scientific' terms. Since science is about rejecting all false assumptions and hypotheses in search of the one true theory, such mental habit also came to define the rationalist scientism of ‘social sciences’ and modern ideologies. Then, it is no wonder that Modernism was both liberating and limiting. Initially, it led to the explosion of freedoms unthinkable earlier. But in its imitation of science, so much in the arts, architecture, music, literature, and social commentary came to insist that a certain form, method, or narrative was THE true one. Even though such attitudes emerged in opposition to the old dominant Idea or Narrative, the New Way was less about freedom than about the replacement of the old dogma with the new doctrine, even at the expense of eradicating future freedom to think differently and independently. Then, it’s hardly surprising that so much of the humanities is now more about technical jargon and 'correct' consensus than about personal and individualistic thinking on various matters. Even in discussion of popular entertainment, consider that so many critics now have a box-mentality that obliges them to praise certain works because of their subject matter and ideology. They might as well all be programmed NPC's. Possibly, the counter-appeal of Nietzsche and Heidegger owes to their rejection of quasi-objectivism that took hold of so much since the advent of science and technology. Objectivity, so essential to science, contracts, legal justice, and journalism, is easily corrupted in areas that are inherently subjective. When English Department that largely deals with fiction & poetry adopts an all-knowing ideology of PC, it creates the illusion that literature must be neatly divided into ‘correct’ and ‘incorrect’, i.e. those in line with the official PC ideology is ‘good’ while those outside it are ‘bad’. Over time, this ideological ‘objectivization’ leads academics to favor bad literature that is ‘good’ over good literature that is ‘bad’.
Even as the humanities came to reject traditional standards and ‘conventional’ criteria of what is good or bad, it came to adopt ideological standards(as a form of new objectivism) of what is approved as opposed to what is ‘unacceptable’. This has affected general discussion as well, which is why anyone who speaks the truth about black crime or racial differences between blacks and non-blacks — just ask James D. Watson — is relegated to pariah-status, whereas total fantasies such as Wakanda(of BLACK PANTHER), BLM hysteria(that evil white cops are gunning down random blacks), and Hate Hoaxes(usually as acts of anti-white defamation carried out mostly by Jews and blacks) are approved, promoted, and even ‘sacralized’. But then, we live in a world where we are to believe that homo fecal-penetration is just as biologically legit as real sex between man and woman involving proper interaction of relevant organs; we are also to believe that if a man puts on a wig and says he’s a ‘woman’, then he is indeed a ‘woman’, but if few months later, he changes his mind and says he’s a man again, he’s a man.
It was bad enough when objectivism affected fields that are, by and large, subjective. While art cannot thrive without standards and some degree of consensus, there is no objective scientific law that can prove that Beatles REVOLVER is better than Rolling Stones’ AFTERMATH. Now, most people with good sense would know the Beatles were better than Herman’s Hermits, but their reasoning must still be made from a subjectivist viewpoint because so much of art appreciation has to do with one’s personal and emotional responses. Also, even though we know that a well-trained classical violinist is a better musician than some high-school violinist, art is more than about technical skills. Indeed, a less conventionally good singer may do more for a song. Maybe Celine Dion could have sung "Landslide" in a ‘better’ way, but Stevie Nicks, with a voice so uniquely bewitching, owns that song as composer and performer.

So, the realm of humanities should never have been infected with ideological objectivism, especially one as confused as PC that, on the one hand, claims to be committed to multiple perspectives against the Mono-Narrative, but then, on the other hand, insists that all perspectives must be converge on globo-homo-ism and be ‘intersectonal’, which really means that all groups must express themselves in ways that lionize Jews, homos, and/or Negroes while blaming all the bad stuff on ‘cis-gender white males’.
But something even stranger happened following the ‘objectivization’ of the humanities and English Department. Because Movies and TV do so much to convey an impression of shared reality and because so many journalists start out as English Majors, subjectivism(the stuff of art and fiction) has also seeped into what should be the objectivity of journalism and the law. Just consider: Today, Arts & Entertainment must conform to the mono-objectivism of PC. This goes from the haute Art World down to comic books for kids. So, we have Art Galleries selling million-dollar piles of junk about ‘patriarchy’ or ‘my liberated vagina’, and we have Archies comic book where the hero sacrifices his life to save a saintly homo from a deranged ‘homophobe’. Once the subjective humanities were turned ‘objective’ via PC ideology, they became a socio-political tool. Since journalism is about objective coverage of world events and trends, it began to take cues from the humanities that now claimed to have an objective grasp on society, justice, politics, and truth. Subjective was made ‘objective’, and in turn, objective was made ‘subjective’. It’s on wonder that so much of what passes for journalism today is about ‘muh feels’ that are now baked into the hearts and minds of anyone who attends college. Just consider: Obama as ‘the one’, Homomania as new faith, ‘gay marriage’ as legitimate, a man with wig is a ‘woman’, Russian Collusion Hoax, Trump is ‘literally Hitler’, Wakanda is truth, New STAR WARS is better than ever because ‘diversity’, ‘hate speech’ is not free speech, and etc. It’s gotten so ludicrous that even some on the Political Left are beginning to dump on the Lunacy:


(Jimmy Dore’s denunciation of the Russia Hysteria or Russysteria is most welcome and necessary, but he runs the same tired narrative on Joe McCarthy. While McCarthy was reckless and reached too far, a vast Soviet Network had sprung up in the US in government and cultural spheres during the FDR years. That was no joke, no fantasy. Even big shots like Harry Dexter White and Alger Hiss were communist spies. Rosenbergs and Morton Sobell funneled atom bomb blueprints — the most carefully guarded secrets in the US — to Stalin’s empire, the destroyer of millions of lives and occupier of Eastern Europe. And there were real communists and Soviet spies in media, entertainment, and academia. So, why have so many influential Jews, especially in academia and media, attacked McCarthy and the ‘Red Scare’ over the yrs ? Because many of the radicals and Soviet spies were Jews. That is why even non-communist Jews circled the wagon for the sake of Tribal Solidarity and spread the counter-hysteria that the ‘Red Scare’ had all been paranoid ‘hysteria’ when, in fact, there had been an extensive communist cabal in the US that funneled tons of secrets to Stalin’s government. Today, Jews are doing the opposite. If Jews of yesteryear denounced anti-communism as mostly paranoia, they now concoct and spread utterly bogus hysteria about Russia. Why? Even though the tactics have changed, they both serve the same core objective: Tribal Jewish Power. In the past, Wasps controlled the US, and Jews even sided with communists to discredit the Establishment. Jews worked with subversives to decry the Establishment’s anti-radical measures as ‘rabid and virulent’. Today, Jews are the Establishment and fear any dissent against or subversion of their power. Jews work with the Deep State to silence, shut down, and blacklist any courageous dissenting voice as ‘hateful’, ‘divisive’, or ‘Russian’. Funny that these Jewish elites who show zero solidarity with the Nationalist Folks of America insist that the latter must stand in solidarity with the former. "You suck our dick while we cut off your balls." Why do Jews now hate Russia so much? In the 1990s, Jewish globalists economically looted Russia and nearly owned that country. But Vladimir Putin restored some national sovereignty and locked up a handful of super oligarchs who happened to be Jewish. THAT is why Jews hate Putin and Russia. It’s not about ‘liberal democracy’ but Tribal Supremacism. Jews think they should own and rule Russia like they’ve come to own and rule US, UK, and Canada. Also, Russia, along with Iran and China, is one of the few nations on Earth that remains somewhat independent of US that is controlled by EOJ or Empire of Judea. And so, Jews fear Russia as a model of goy Nationalist Resistance against Jewish globo-homo Hegemonism. That is why the Jew-run Media have cooked up this nonsense about Russia Hysteria. Indeed, isn’t it funny that the very Jew-run Media that berate Donald Trump as a puppet of Russia, a foreign nation, have no problem with his truly servile attitude toward Israel, another foreign nation? What does that tell you? It means Jews demand that white Americans prioritize Jewish interests above all else. And yet, there is a paradox. Even as Jews increasingly dump on white conservatives as the unifying object of hatred for Jews and People of Color, they also increasingly rely on white conservatives to support Jews and Israel because Grievance Politics among POC often turn against Jewish privilege and Zionist tyranny. With there being less support for Israel and growing criticism of white-Jewish privilege among the growing non-white base among Democrats, Jews will have to depend more on support for Israel among white conservatives. Jews will have to increasingly rely on the very people they denigrate most in the media. But can Jews expect continued support among white conservatives when the latter is beginning to wake up to the fact that most virulent forms of anti-white-ism originates from Jews?)

Anyway, here we are in the 21st Century following the tumultuous 20th Century, the most notable developments of which was (1) Rise of USA as the premier world power and (2) Jewish takeover as the premier elites of the US. So, the 21st Century began with the legacy of the 20th that Jews on top of the world. It began with Jews controlling the US that controls the world. And one key feature of that control is the Mono-media-ism or Mono-mediantics of the Jews. Jews control the media like the Sun itself. Especially in the age of electronic media, most people get the news, info, ideas, data, entertainment, and messaging through rays from movie screens, TV screens, smart-phone screens, computer screens, and etc. We are constantly exposed to these rays. There are over 330 million people in America — many more if we include illegals — , and everyone has one or more TV’s, PC computers, laptops, smart-phones, and other such devices. And Hollywood still rakes in billions every year because so many young people flock to theaters with its giant electronic screens. And cities are increasingly covered with electronic advertisement.

Now, because we purchase and possess our own devices, there is a sense of autonomy and independence. After all, you watch your program on your TV, and I watch my program on my TV. You look for your news on your computer, and I look for my news on my computer. And yet, all these devices are useless on their own. They are merely hardware designed to relay or play something made by someone else. And for most of us for most of the time in most places, everything we are watching is made by a handful of people in NY, LA, and few other key centers. A handful of corporations controlled by oligarchs of a Certain Tribe get to decide who gets hired, what gets written, what gets made and who makes them, and how they are marketed. So, paradoxically, the fact that we own our devices has turned all of us into mental-sensual-and-emotional slaves of a handful of corporations controlled by World Jewry and their Homo agents. (Tootkins have gained much because they are experts of subtle finger-work in an economy that is increasingly less dependent on brawny arm-and-leg work of the working class. Appreciation of finger-work is in inverse proportion to depreciation in arm-and-leg work. There is still, however, some use of handiwork.) We own the devices, but Jews control the light that comes through them. Thus, we are all exposed to the Jew-Ray or J-Ray. Jewish Power owes much to their control of the Light of Modernity. Prior to electricity and rise of modern mass media, most goyim relied on local community for values, ideas, and information. Also, as there was far less centralization of society and nation, there were many media outlets, and often, local news and affairs took precedence over the Grand Narrative. Furthermore, news and ideas didn’t travel instantly and uniformly. But with the rise of electronic media, everything began to change. Those who controlled the signals could reach millions upon millions, then tens of millions upon tens of millions, then hundreds of millions upon hundreds of million, then billions upon billions... and uniformly and instantly. It began with sound with the advent of radio. Cinema emerged before radio, but one had to actually go to the movies. It didn’t follow one home. Also, even though cinema depended on electricity, film reels had to be physically transported from theater to theater. In contrast, the radio was in the house, possibly in every room. And then came the TV that combined sound & image and soon found its way into every home, then just about every room. Everyone owned his or her own TV but had NO control over what he or she saw. He or she became spellbound with the rays emanating from the screen. Through those rays, he or she found much entertainment and joy. He or she received much essential information and news. Through documentaries, he or she learned about other parts of the world. So much was for the good. But he or she came under the spell of those who monopolized the Light and turned them into rays that would alter minds and transform(or deform) souls all across the world. In DIE NIBELUNGEN, the Jewish-like dwarfs gain control of the Rhine Gold and then fashion a Ring of Power out of it to control the world.

Jews have gained supremacy with money, gold, and diamonds. But their power over us has to do with their control of Light. Prior to the rise of electricity, Light belonged to the Sun, the stars, and man's control of fire. Nighttime was lit by torches, firewood, or candles. For a time, city streets were lit with gas lamps. And then, with the coming of electricity and the light-bulb, nighttime became universally lit for everyone, at least in the First World. Humanity no longer depended on the Sun or on unreliable & often dangerous fire for radiance. With a flick of the switch, nighttime could be as bright or even brighter than the day. But, electricity didn’t merely light up the night or run machinery. It could be processed into signals to transmit enticing semblances of sound and image. And with the radio(and later with TV), these signals could travel through the air without wire. There was no longer the need for cumbersome infrastructure, as with telephones prior to the advent of the Cell Phone. A media center with powerful antennae could transmit its signals to millions upon millions of people. And with satellite technology, a single media center could reach the entire world. Beatles’ performance of "All You Need is Love" was the first globally transmitted TV broadcast via satellite, but its real lesson was All You Need Is Light. Beatles sang the song, but Jews came to control the light, the rays emanating from the screens of countless TV screens all around the world.


It didn’t matter if your TV was made in US, Germany, or Japan. On its own, a TV set is nothing. It exists only to relay the Light transmitted via signals, and the power to create that Light for all the world came to be controlled by Jews. Jews understood that control of Light was more powerful than control of Gold.
In Greek mythology, Prometheus steals fire from the gods and gifts it to mankind. In Judeo-centric Historiography, St. Paul ‘stole’ the spirituality light of the Jews and passed it onto goyim. Zeus was angry with Prometheus and punished him forever(though the story of Heracles says he freed Prometheus from the torment). And we know that Jews never forgave Jesus and St. Paul for passing the Jewish God to the Gentiles. Likewise, as with Zeus and religious Jews, modern secular Jews are determined to maintain monopoly ownership of the Light. Jews want all of us to remain spellbound by the J-Ray. Jews also use Gay-Ray, or Propaganda of Homomania, to serve the J-Ray. Not only are homos the most loyal and zealous servant-partners of Jewish Power but Homomania complements Jewish Supremacism as both are predicated on Minority Elite Supremacism. If Jewish Light is the Sun of the Mass Media, Homo Light is its ‘rainbow’. Like the Sun vanquishes all the stars in the sky, Jewish Media Power works tirelessly to blot out and silence all alternative and counter-narratives. And the Jewish Sun seeds the clouds to produce cultural conditions conducive for the 'gay rainbow’, which has been associated with men who do homo fecal-penetration or tranny penis-cutting.
In a way, each of us is living in a TRUMAN SHOW. Our Jewish Master uses the power of Light to control our beliefs, values, and perimeters of what-is-permissible. We are trapped in two ways, like people in Peter Weir’s movie. Truman is trapped because he’s been duped into believing that his bubble-world is real. But then, people who are addicted to watching Truman are also trapped because, even though on the outside, their lives revolve around the life shaped and manipulated by Media Central. They are as addicted to Truman as Truman is anchored to his fake world. And even as they root for Truman’s escape, it all takes place within the bubble, and even after Truman's liberation, the viewers demand yet another show. It’s like they’ve been robbed of the inner light and inner life because they’ve become so accustomed to artificial worlds beamed to them on their TVs. Again, they own the TV’s but not what comes through them. Of course, as the movie was made by Hollywood, the villainous media mogul who would be god is a goy, but in the real world, we know that such figures are Jews.


We are bombarded with J-Ray, not the White Light. In all the religions and mythologies, God or gods own and control the light. Mankind could only hope to harness some of that light. Or it had to contend with unstable and dangerous fire that produced smoke or burned out of control... or was difficult to reignite in wind and rain. Just as mankind enviously eyed the magical flight of birds, it was filled with fear and awe of the power of God or gods over the Light. Indeed, consider the cultures that sacrificed so many innocents to appease the Sun god. Just like God or gods held tremendous sway over mankind that believed in Light as a divine source, Jews now have godlike power over us as they control the electronic light that transfixes virtually all of humanity. Even in nations where Jews don’t directly own and control the media, so many people demand more J-Ray from Hollywood and US mass media. After all, however vile and wicked Jewish Power may be, the fact remains that Jews are talented in creativity and, with their vast financial resources, scoop up talents from around the world. Jewish Hollywood makes a lot of crap, but it’s expensive good-looking crap, and that sure beats cheap-looking crap made by the rest of the world. The New STAR WARS is crap, but with a budget over $100 million, it looks better than space fantasy movies made for few millions, which is what the rest of the world can barely afford. With control of the Electronic Media, it’s as if Jews control the Sun of Modernity. Media might as well be called Sunstein.

Close Encounters of the Third Kind

Close Encounters - Mothership

Compared to the J-Ray of Sunstein media, dissident voices are like stars in the night. There are so many of them but disconnected from one another. Though there have always been dissident voices in a controlled democracy like the US, most remained invisible and unheard. Those that garnered some degree of attention did something outlandish, like anarchists who threw bombs at the police, individuals who assassinated politicians, extremist groups that either rioted or practiced strange rituals, and radicals-of-convenience selectively & momentarily exploited by the power. (Jew-run Mass media promoted the Westboro Church to defame anti-homo-agenda people as a bunch of deranged lunatics.) Obviously, if ‘fringe groups’ or extremist individuals do something really far-out or outlandish, they will get attention. But the Power will sometimes use certain radical individuals or groups as subversive or corrosive agents against rival Powers. A famous case of this was the Right-Wing German government use of Lenin and Bolsheviks to undermine the nationalist government in Russia. Germans, in their short-term interests, figured communist takeover of Russia was worth it if it assured German victory on the Eastern Front. Generally, the Power seeks to maintain respectability and avoids appearing extreme, unseemly, or dirty. So, it will use the shadow government — CIA, FBI, NSA, etc — to do the dirty work under the cover of ‘official business’. Or, esp in Third World nations(but also in first ones), the Power will use its ties with the underworld to carry out certain deeds. CIA had ties with the Mafia, and Zionists worked with gangsters like Meyer Lansky to pull strings. Or, the Power will selectively favor certain radicals to do its bidding while claiming plausible deniability. We see this in how Jewish Power uses Antifa to shut down dissident voices on the Right. Even as the Power denies direct links between itself and Antifa thugs, it pulls strings to ensure that the police and courts will go lightly on Antifa gangs. Thus, Antifa has essentially become the para-military force of the globo-homo power.

Jewish Power also works like the mafia in this regard: It runs an Extortion Racket as a Protection Program. But of course, you must pay off the Jews and/or serve them in order to have protection from none other than them. Jews make you an offer you can’t refuse. Jews use para-gangster organizations like SPLC, ADL, and AIPAC as moral covers to do their bidding. These groups veil their activities in the guise of Moral Crusade to pressure politicians, social critics, artists, entertainers, and businessmen into sucking up to Jews and supporting Israel. If anyone refuses to go along, the groups work in tandem with the Jew-run media to smear the American Refusenik as a ‘hater’, ‘extremist’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘anti-Semite’, and etc. Jewish Power has been so effective in this that cucking to Jews has become almost second-nature among prominent whites. Just look at Mitt Romney, the worthless dog of the Jews. Donald Trump pumped himself as a proud and tough white man, but look at him recently. He has Zionist cum drooling down the side of his lips. He looks like he’s been rammed in the ass by Chuck the Buttfuc* Schumer.

Anyway, whereas Jewish Media Power is like the powerful Sun whose rays cover all the world and own all the sky(as stars and the Moon are rendered invisible), dissident voices are like the dispersed stars in the sky. There are so many stars in the night, but the sky remains dark because there is no unity among the stars. Due to the internet, there are now more stars than ever. Unlike in the past when few corporations controlled all the media, anyone has the chance to become an known entity via the internet. As such, he or she can disseminate ideas disapproved by the Power. Indeed, this is the crucial difference between Established Electronica and New Electronica. With TV, the flow of images and sounds was only in one direction. It was from Media Central to all of us. We received but never returned information(except through ‘letters to the editor’). Also, there were limited means by which people could communicate with one another and form their own networks. Mostly, people talked to friends and family on the phone or sent letters. It was just person-to-person. But with the rise of the internet, a single voice on the internet can win over numerous fans. And there are eccentrics like PewDiePie who has tens of millions of followers on Youtube. Thus, in some ways, the stars in the sky are getting brighter and brighter. Meanwhile, the Sunstein seems to be dimming as more and more people, especially young ones, tend to rely more on peers and personalities on the internet for information than on official sources or establishment figures that, especially for people on the Right, have lost so much credibility, mainly because being so subservient to Jewish Power and addled with PC dogma has rendered most journalists into mere tools of the Power. One would have to be dumb, dishonest, demented, or deranged with worship of power-for-power’s-sake to take anything by the so-called mainstream media seriously. It’s just more Jewish globo-homo propaganda. In contrast, despite their limited resources and access to sources, many dissident, eccentric, or unique people on the internet can speak their minds and offer frank assessments of what may be REALLY going on.

Thus, Sunstein is dimming while the stars are burning ever more brightly. Still, the balance of power is with Sunstein. Also, the internet, like big media, has fallen into the hands of Jewish globo-homo supremacists. How did Jews manage to take over the internet? They used the Old Hustle Trick. You know how the hustle works. Some guy pretends to be not so good at billiards and loses a few games. The other guy gains confidence and plays for higher stakes. And then, the hustler shows his true colors and cleans up.
Jews used the same trick with takeover of the internet. But then, Jews pulled the same stunt in their takeover of mass media. If Jews, prior to media takeover, had revealed their true intentions — that, with media power, they intend to promote anti-white hatred and infect whites with ‘white guilt’ and ‘white self-loathing’ — , would they have been allowed to take over? Of course not. So, what did Jews do? They pretended to be Good Americans who love to compose Christmas songs and make patriotic war movies & all those Western movies that pay tribute to white menfolk and womenfolk who conquered and settled the West. So, most whites came to see Jews as Good Patriotic Decent Americans and didn’t oppose Jewish takeover of the media. But when Jews finally had monopoly control of the media, they showed their true face and pushed one anti-white agenda after another.
Jews did much the same to take over the internet. Platforms, Search Engines, and Social Networks controlled by Jews gained dominance by claiming to be neutral. Remember Google’s motto used to be "Don’t Be Evil". It created the impression that Google would be fair to all and not rig things to favor certain groups or agendas over others. Indeed, if Google and Facebook had stated at the very outset what their ultimate agenda would be — favor globo-homo progs over conservatives, effectively censor search results(or ‘censearch’), use monopoly power to smear certain individuals and groups while protecting others with far more power and record of evil, etc. — , at least half of America would NEVER have signed up to use their services. But Google, Facebook, and other such platforms hustled us and sucked us all in with promise of neutrality and fairness. But once they gained monopoly control, they went about favoring certain figures, ideas, and agendas over others. Also, while Jew-run Google and Facebook shut down or shadow-ban any courageous white voice who speaks truth to power, certain groups are ‘protected’ from the same standards.

Jews would have us believe that these groups need special protection because they are so vulnerable, but it’s all bogus. It’s really about Protected Supremacisms. What honest person can deny that the main supremacisms in the US are Jewish, black, and homo? Jews control just about all elite institutions and industries that matter. Blacks use their superior muscle power to dominate sports and beat up whites all over in streets and schools. And homos have been elevated to neo-angel status in America. Queertianity has become a defacto compulsory neo-religion for all those who want to succeed in life. Also, it’s hilarious when Jews claim to oppose anti-Muslim speech because it’s ‘hate speech’. It was Hollywood Jews who made all those movies with Muslims-as-Terrorists that convinced so many Americans that 'Muzzies' are subhuman psychos. It was Jewish groups that pressured Americans into supporting Israel that has terrorized and tyrannized so many Palestinian Muslim lives. It was Jewish Neocons and Liberal Zionists who used Deep State and Big Media to make the US wage Wars for Israel that has destroyed millions of Muslim lives in Middle East and North Africa. Jews pull all this shit, but they got the gall to pretend that they are protecting vulnerable Muslims from ‘haters’. These are the same Jews who used mega-money and media power to make Congress pass the unconstitutional anti-BDS laws. Jews are truly vile and hideous in their hyper-hypocrisy. Sometimes, I wonder if Jews are simply disgustingly dishonest... or are they so full of themselves as the smartest, wisest, richest, most successful, most tragic(‘muh holocuast’), and most ‘progressive’(always pushing some nuttery as the new moral panic of the year) that they’ve become blind to their own perfidy and venality. Consider a vile lowlife scum like Bari Weiss:

Via the Hustle, Jews gained monopoly control of the internet. Granted, not all platforms are owned by Jews, but as even Big Goyim in Big Tech rely on Jewish finance, Jewish lawyers & judges, Jewish academia, Jewish-controlled Deep State, and etc., they have no choice but to play along. Just look at Jack Dorsey’s dorky cuck-face. He always looks weak and wussy like Brad Pitt after he was castrated by Hollywood and Angelica Jolie. He’s always looking over his shoulders to see if anything he says has the approval of ADL, a Jewish ‘protection racket’ that is always "making an offer you can’t refuse".

Jack Dorsey the Dorky Horsey

Or consider the pussy-wussy goy-boy at Cloudflare who denied service to Daily Stormer in hope of obtaining more shekels from Jewish Finance. Now, Andrew Anglin and Daily Stormer are shit, BUT when we look at the state the world is in, WHO did all the damage? Anglin the clown who posts ridiculous headlines on his site or Zionist globo-homo scum and their goy cuck-puppets who used financial trickery to rob trillions and waged Wars for Israel to wreck entire nations? And who has promoted all the ugly gangsta rap music that encouraged urban violence? Andrew Anglin never killed anyone. Timothy McVeigh killed 150. Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright starved and killed 100,000s of Iraqi children in the 90s in service of Zionist Supremacism. And yet, the Jew-run media and their cuck-puppets would have us believe that the good citizens of Silicon Valley are working so tirelessly to shut down ‘hate’ that may destroy lives. This is funny coming from Google, a company that has major centers in Israel, a nation created via Nakba pogroms, a imperialist power that still occupies West Bank. Cuck-Duck Donald Trump says US troops will remain in Syria to protect Israel, but who is endangering whom? When was the last time Syria attacked Israel? In contrast, Israel has shot so many missiles and dropped so many bombs on Syria. Israel aided so many terrorists in Syria. Like the saying goes, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you."

If Trump wants to remain in Syria to protect it from Israel, that would make some sense. In fact, he keeps US soldiers in Syria to pin it down so that Israel can attack it more, but Trump and the Jew-run Sunstein media spin it as "US is protecting Israel from Syria and its allies." With Jews, you lose. I’m not the one to deny or disbelieve the core facts of Shoah or the Holocaust, but I’m beginning to see the need for Holocaust Realization. A Holocaust Realizer would be someone who finally realizes why something as horrific as Shoah befell Jews. Based on observations of Jewish supremacist behavior in the past 50 yrs, it isn’t difficult to understand why so many people were ‘antisemitic’ and hated Jews. While it’s possible that Jews of yesteryear were totally different from Jews of here-and-now, that is unlikely. Recent Jewish behavior strongly suggests why ‘antisemitism’ was so prevalent throughout European history. These Jews just don’t know when to quit. Pushy, deranged, contemptuous, and hateful, they are vicious and sadistic. Given them an inch, and they will go about totally destroying you and your people. Jews are essentially like Gypsies with higher intelligence. Also, the neuroticism arising from conflict between Jewish tribal supremacism and secular-universal moralism seems to have literally driven a third of them insane, a third of them cynical, and a third of them nihilistic.

Jews control the internet like they control the media, but there is, of course, one key difference. Given the nature of the internet, Jews cannot maintain total monopoly as with the Old Media. While Youtube can ban and censor many voices, it can’t suppress all voices. Also, the more that Big Tech companies censor or rig algorithms, word gets around that Jewish Geeks are up to no good, and this increases anti-Jewish animus and distrust among goyim. Also, the Jewish Monopoly’s censorship of elements of the Left that supports BDS is making more people(across the political spectrum) wake up to the hypocrisy of Jewish Power that claims to be ‘progressive’ and for the ‘little guy’ but is actually indistinguishable from the ugly Zionist supremacism of Sheldon Adelson and Thomas Friedman.
Also, because it’s less expensive to start an internet company than a traditional media company, even small players can enter the market and pose some degree of challenge to the big players. If Youtube censors too much, it will be a huge boost to a site like Bitchute that mostly eschews censorship. And despite all the Power’s effort to shut down Gab.ai as Free Speech alternative to Twitter, it’s still going and growing. And the reaction to Patreon’s banning of Sargon of Akkad goes to show that people have some power to push back against Big Tech in ways that readers and viewers didn’t have with Print and TV media.


Hopefully, the dissident stars in the night will burn ever more brightly as the Sunstein media dims and becomes overcome with sunspots. Sure, it has solar flares now and then to get people like Alex Jones de-platformed from every major site. Jewish Monopolies have the ultimate kill-switch on much of the internet. Furthermore, Jews use their control of Payment Processing to effectively silence voices and destroy lives by cutting off funds. Just like Zionist conquerors in the West Bank cut off water-supplies to Palestinians, Jewish monopolists cut off money supply to goyim they hate.



Jews also use Narrative Tyranny to have people they hate fired. In the current US, if someone is labeled as ‘alt right’ or ‘white nationalist’, he can be fired from any job. But if someone is an open Zionist supremacist who supports Wars for Israel, hatred against Russia & Iran, defamation of white people, and oppression of Palestinians, he faces no job risk. If anything, his Jewish supremacism will do wonders for his resume in climbing the corporate ladder or working for the Deep State.
Indeed, the US government passed a law that not only supports Zionist tyranny but penalizes anyone who supports BDS and justice for Palestinians against Zionist-supremacist-imperialist tyranny. In the current US, a sicko like Sheldon Adelson who called for the nuking of Iran gets to rake in billions of dollars and buy off whore politicians. But if you’re a white person who says, "It’s Okay to be White", Jews, their Antifa goons, and Anti-Fact shills in Cuck-Media will harass, bully, and threaten your place of employment to get your fired. THAT is how Jews behave. Just ask the Palestinians. If Jews treat a people as powerless and blameless as the Palestinians as subhuman, why would they treat YOU any differently? Jews wanted Palestinian land, and so, they pulled off all sorts of dirty tricks to dispossess Palestinians and humiliate them. Dirty Jews use the smokescreen of 'progressivism' and 'compassion for the disenfranchised' to hide their supremacism. It's just another manifestation of "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you." By making so much noise about protecting the powerless, Jews hope that we won't notice that they are the Powerful who oppress the powerless. Just ask the Palestinians. Jews want total supremacy over the US and want whites to be their cuck-dogs forever. So, why would Jews with their monopoly power treat whites with ANY fairness or decency? Since when does a master treat a slave as an equal? Again, just ask the Palestinians, and they will tell you what Jews do to you once they gain supremacist power over you and your kind.

Is there a way by which the dissident stars can pull their lights together to form a Counter-Sun to the Sunstein Media? The White Light against the J-Ray? It won’t be easy, and truth be told, too many people on the Alt Right and Dissident Right lack the kind of prophetic vision, inspiration, and theory of justice to create a movement that pools all the lights together. What Lawrence said of the Arabs may apply to the Alt Right and Dissident Right as well: "...so long as the Arabs fight tribe against tribe, so long will they be a little people, a silly people, greedy, barbarous, and cruel, as you are." To lead a great movement, there has to be men of drive and ambition, but it can’t just be about ME, ME, ME. For awhile, people thought Richard Spencer might be the one to lead, but his spiled-brat selfishness as a player made it impossible for him to recruit and keep men of quality around him. He just ended up with second-raters or far-right lunatics.
But then, no great movement can be led by gentlemen. Jared Taylor is a respectable persona to those who know him, but a man who dares not to get his feathers ruffled won’t have what is necessary to form an army of true-believing warriors. When the right man finally arrives on the scene, maybe all the disparate and dispersed white lights in the sky will come together to form a light so bright and powerful that it will illuminate a new path for the white race. One wonders what might have been possible if Adolf Hitler and National Socialists had served as a bridge between the West(mainly UK and France) and the East(mainly Russia and Slavic nations). He could have been one of the greatest man that ever lived. Instead, by picking on Poland, he drove a wedge between Germany and UK/France. But he had a second chance as Germany prevailed over France in an easy victory. Hitler could still have worked to serve as bridge between the West and Russia, then an ally. But he turned on Russia, and that was the end of the dream. No man had so much of world history in the palm of his hand and then lost everything. But then, Hitler was born with a pathological personality, and maybe there was nothing to stop the madness in the long run. Men of inspiration tend to be eccentric and extreme in some way... but they must be fundamentally sane and sound of mind and spirit if they're to make a positive mark on humanity.

Why White People Need Their Own COVENANT in a One-Truth and One-Power World

Why did Jews need a Covenant with God? It was because they believed in only one God. If Jews believed in many gods for different peoples as pagan folks did, then there would have been no need for the Covenant. Jews would have said Romans have their gods, Syrians have their gods, Persians have their gods, Egyptians have their gods, and so on; therefore, we Jews have own God or gods. If Jews have their own God or gods and if other peoples have their own gods, then every people are satisfied and secure in the worship of their own gods. In the absence of one God and one Truth to rule over all the heavens, all the earth, and all of man, there is no need for a Covenant. After all, the gods of your people are yours. Granted, pagans might ‘steal’ other people’s gods or fuse their gods with foreign gods. Romans fused many of their gods with Greek gods. Still, your people have a unique set of gods and other peoples have their more-or-less unique sets of gods. Even when one pagan tribe took the gods of another tribe, they eventually transformed the gods into their own. And Jews could have been content with God or gods of their own while believing in the legitimacy of other peoples having their own gods to worship.

But Jews didn’t go that way. Out of boldness, imagination, arrogance, megalomania, or whatever, Jews came to believe in only one God for themselves. So, if pagan folks worshiped many gods, Jews only worshiped one God. But Jews didn’t end there. They decided all the other gods of pagan folks are false gods. They don’t exist, they are not real, they have no validity. Only the one and only Jewish God is the sole maker and ruler of all. In a way, such a development may have been defensive. After all, since many other tribes were bigger and stronger than Jews, there was the chance that Jews might be tempted to ditch the Jewish tribe and its God and go join some other tribe that is mightier and worship their god-idols. But if every Jewish child were instilled from childhood with the warning all other gods are false — and it is a GRAVE SIN to worship their idols — , there was much less chance of Jews going over to other tribes to worship different gods.
But the development of Jewish psycho-theology was also aggressive, ambitious, and ‘imperialist’. If Jews couldn’t conquer the material world with hands and feet, they could conquer the spiritual world with the feat of imagination. So, in their souls, Jews came to believe that their God not only conquered all the world but own all the world. Indeed, Jews went even further and said their God created the world. Pagan mythologies were far more humble in their claim. Few if any said their gods created everything. Even in Hinduism, the gods are as created by the cosmos that is created or ‘dreamed’ by them.

So, in the Jewish spiritual imagination, there is only one God, and this God is for all times, all places, and all peoples. But here’s the rub. If there is only one God, and if He did indeed make all the world, all the peoples, all the places, and all the things, why would He favor any one people? Wouldn't all the world be part of His holiness? Wouldn’t all peoples be His beloved children? Wouldn’t all things be His precious creations? If God is the only God and if He has universal ownership and mastery over everyone and everything, then why would He belong to Jews alone?
Now, such considerations didn’t worry Jews prior to the development of monotheism. At one point, the proto-Jews had their god or gods, and they respected the fact that other tribes had their own gods. So, Jews prayed to their god or gods, and other tribes had their own forms of idol-worship. But at some point, Jews got into ferocious prophetic mode, and their leaps of imagination led to believe that they must worship only one God, and furthermore, their one and only God is the one and only God of all the universe. With a blinding stroke, the Jewish mind exploded an atomic bomb in the spirit-verse and wiped out all the competing gods. "...now I am become Death, the destroyer of gods..." And in the end, the Jewish mind decided there is only one God and one Truth. All other competing gods are not even inferior gods or even defeated gods. They are false gods, and they never existed. They were phony from the start, because from the beginning of time to the end of time, there was, is, and will be only one God, the God of the Jewish imagination.

But if this God is so great and if Jews are such a humble insignificant tribe, why would God favor the Jews? I mean, if there were indeed just one God in the universe, wouldn’t it be likelier that He would favor and side with a great powerful tribe than one so pathetic as that of the Hebrews? In ancient times, the Jews weren’t even close to being a great power. Even at the height of their glory, they ruled over just a bit of land and soon got invaded by others and had to survive at their mercy. So, why would the great God have favored such a pathetic tribe? After all, in pagan stories, gods favor the strong and powerful. Greek gods, Persian gods, Roman gods, or Germanic gods, they bestow affection and favors on the heroes, adventurers, and conquerors. Jews were far less accomplished in those fields that other tribes and kingdoms that were much greater.
And this is why Jews needed to come up with the Covenant. Without it, there was no guarantee that God would stick with the Jews. Imagine there’s an island with only women. Suppose each woman believes in her own dream man. Some women are beautiful, some women are plain, some woman are ugly. But each has a dream of her ideal man. But suppose one homely woman says all their dreams are false. Only HER dream of the ideal man is true. So, her dream and only her dream of man has validity. Now suppose what she says comes to be true. While all the men of other dreams never materialize, the man of her dreams does materialize. Suppose one evening, a man arrives on the shore of the island, and it is the man of the homely woman’s imagination. So, she was right, whereas all the other dreams of man were false. There is only one man, and he is it. BUT, if indeed it is true that he is the only man, a wonderful handsome man, where’s the guarantee that he would choose the homely woman over other women who are much prettier? So, if the homely woman is to bind the man to her, she has to come up with a covenant between him and her. Without that sacred bond, he might act like Bill Clinton and drive her crazy like Billy Boy did to Hillary. Also, not only would he want to go to others, but all the women will want him since the word is out that he is the one and only man. When the women had believed that their dreams of man were also valid, each could hope for the arrival of her special man. But if they all now agree that there is only one man, then all will want to do it with him.

The Jewish way of spirituality and truth has always been ultra-contradictory. They wanted their God to be Lord over all but belong only to the Jews. Jews were like an ultra-jealous wife. Jews insisted there is only one Truth for the world, yet they wanted sole ownership of this truth. We still see this Jewish trait today. America is like the god of power, the one and only superpower in all the world. On the one hand, Jews promote America as the lord of all nations, the one and only model for all peoples and cultures. The American Way is the only way, and all the world must be Americanized abroad, and all peoples must aspire to come to America. And yet, America must serve Jewish interests above all. Even as America is a ruler over and savior of all peoples, it must have a special covenant with the Jews. AIPAC makes sure that the US pledges no loyalty to any other nation but Israel. Jews hate Donald Trump even though he’s pro-Zionist because he ran on better relations with Russia(a nation totally hated by Jews) and ending the Wars for Israel. What? United States improving relations with Russia that refused to let Jews take over everything? What? United States not fighting more wars to strengthen Israel’s hands in the Middle East?

Also, Trump’s anti-immigrationist stance is threatening to the Jewish notion of the special covenant between the US and Jews. After all, the people with the greatest historical claim of covenant with America are the Anglos. They are the ones who settled it with colonies, they are the ones who fought the Revolutionary War, and they are ones who laid the foundations of America. So, if any people can claim a special covenant with the US, it is the Anglos(and their Dutch and Germanic brethren) who did the most heavy-lifting in the formative stages to expand and build the nation. American Indians were here first, but they had to be removed in order for America to be possible. Black slaves did a lot of heavy-lifting in the South, but it wasn’t their vision, ideas, values, culture, and language that made America.

But if Anglos have a special covenant with America, then it means Jews have no right to steer the one and only America as lone superpower to their own ends. If America must serve Jews like the one and only God serves the Jews, then the American covenant must be with Jews, not with Anglos. Just like God lords over all peoples but only serves Jews, America must lord over(and provide for) all peoples but serve only Jews. Imagine if America decided to serve the interests and the narrative of Palestinian-Americans as well as that of Jewish-Americans. Zionism would come under a lot of heat, like white rule in South Africa.
Trump’s implicitly pro-white anti-immigration stance is seen by Jews as an attempt to restore the American covenant back into the hands of white gentiles, especially people of Anglo-Celtic-Germanic stock. Even though Jews frame the immigration-debate as one between ‘white supremacist’ America and wonderful Diversity, it’s really between white American special covenant and Jewish American special covenant. Jews are pro-immigration because, on their own, they simply don’t have the numbers. Now, if the US were 80% Jewish, I guarantee Jews would NOT be calling for more immigration unless it’s Jewish.

Because Anglos and Northern Europeans have the most powerful rationale for a special covenant with America, Jews have done everything to impugn, discredit, invalidate, or reinterpret the founding and development of America. So, Jews say the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were not foundations for a creation of white Christian nation but a universal proposition nation. So, Jews make a big fuss about black slavery to instill whites with guilt. (Jews don't make a fuss about slavery in Latin American nations even though they brought over many more slaves — and many Jews were involved in slavery in Brazil — because Jews need Latinos as allies against whites. Jews also don’t make much of a fuss about the ‘genocide’ and ‘rape’ of the indigenous folks in Latin America for the same reason and also to promote race-mixing as a good to deracinate the white race. And Jews are no longer interested in American Indians because their tragic story is about how immigration-invasion can destroy the native cultures of a land. It’s difficult to be romantic about Emma Lazarus when one considers what happened to American Indians. It’s like Zionist immigration to Palestine led to Nakba and dispossession of Palestinians who ended up on their trail of tears.) To instill whites with guilt, Jews made the Civil War a bigger event than the Revolutionary War. It won’t be long before Jews make the date of Emancipation Proclamation or the end of the Civil War a bigger holiday than the Fourth of July. Jews also love the Civil War because it could be spun as ‘good whites’ siding with ‘justice’ against ‘bad whites’, a theme that would recur in WWII(for far more valid reason as Hitler was really something else). The Jewish lesson of the American Civil War is that whites must attack and fight other whites than side with fellow whites. Jews thrive from divisions among gentiles. Jews remember how the rapprochement between Northern whites and Southern whites led to tremendous revival of white power that held back Jewish interests in the first half of the 20th century. The massive immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe drove many Northern whites(even former Liberals and Progressives) into an alliance with fellow Anglos in the South. All their own problem with immigrants made them sympathize more with Southern whites’ problem with blacks. Northern whites felt, "If we are having such trouble with white folks such as Poles, Russians, Hungarians, Greeks, Italians, Jews, and etc., imagine how tough it must be down south with all them Negroes?" And, so there was growing unity of spirit and purpose between Northern Anglos and Southern whites, and this unity led to tremendous political victories, one of which was ending mass immigration in the mid 1920s. Jews see this as a calamity because of WWII and the Shoah. Jews feel that, had the immigration gates been kept open, many more Jews could have escaped Europe. But Jews never ask themselves whether things would not have gotten so bad for Jews if (1) they didn’t play such a prominent role in the Bolshevik Revolution that ended up killing and tyrannizing so many people (2) they didn’t employ financial dirty trick and cultural degeneracy to make things far worse for Germans in the depressions that followed WWI. But expecting self-reflection among the likes of Jennifer Rubin, William Kristol, Jonathan Podhoretz, Max Boot, Harvey Weinstein, Sarah Silverman, and etc. is a bridge too far.

Anyway, Jews eventually gained near-total control of the elite institutions and industries of America as the one-and-only-superpower(following the Cold War and so-called End of History), and they decided to change the narrative and whatever necessary to ensure that the American Covenant is with Jews and only with Jews. And to secure this, America must rule over Diversity because Diversity cannot unite against Jewish power. And white people will forget about White America because such a concept stirs up memory of a different time when most white Americans felt, most justifiably, that the main American covenant is with Anglos and Anglo-Americanized white European Christians. This is why Jews are so eager to destroy the notion of White America. This is why Jews promote stuff like HAMILTON that has the Founding Fathers as a bunch of ‘groids’. And of course, Latin American whites are eager to collaborate with Jews since the much greater success of Anglo-America had made them feel so small and insignificant for so long. It’s the Latin American way of getting revenge by serving as toadies of Jews.
And it is also why Jews have been especially committed to spreading PC in Northern European nations like UK, Sweden, Ireland, and Germany. After all, those peoples were the covenant-ial building blocks of America. Consider the films EMIGRANTS and THE NEW LAND by Jan Troell. In the past, when white Americans looked back to those nations, they saw whiteness, all whiteness, and the whiteness reminded them of their true origins and roots. But now, due to Jewish intellectual virus having infected the institutions of all those nations, they’ve been committed to (1) massive non-white immigration (2) declaring that their identity is purely cultural and not of blood (3) race-mixing makes for superior people because pale whites sucks (4) feminism that makes white women hate white men, thus breaking the sexual covenant between white men and white women (5) Jungle Fever and ACOWW(Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) on the premise that white women must go with ‘superior’ Negro males while cucky white males accept their inferiority and crawl into their Cuckanda (6) retro-characterizing European heroes and giants as black, a common practice with BBC; even a Finnish TV movie cast a black guy in the role of a famous military officer.

So, there is a reason why Jews have intensified their culture war in Northern European nations. Why did Jewish media pour so much efforts into those nations? It’s because of their historical, cultural, and racial ties to their cousins in the US. As American browns, white Anglos, Germans, Irish, Swedes, and other are bound to look to the old countries for identity and roots. But if even their ancient homelands are Africanized, Asianized, and Islamized, they don’t even have a homeland to hark back to. (Imagine if you remember a time when everyone in your community was white, and things were so much better. The memory of an earlier time might inspire you to rebel against the current order. But suppose Jews have a mind-device that alters your memory so that you remember half of your white friends as blacks or browns. Then, even memory would no longer be a guide to action to restore what you've lost.)

Now, you don’t see Jews doing the same to Israel. Why would American Jews support Jewish-only immigration to Israel but push for non-white invasion of nations like UK, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, and etc? It’s not only to break the white will in those nations but to gaslight and demoralize white Americans. If white Americans see the very lands of their forefathers and foremothers going the way of Diversity and even celebrating it like retards, then what hope is there for white revival in the US? And once white hope is broken, Jews will own the American Covenant for themselves forever as NO OTHER PEOPLE have claim to it once whites are out of the picture. It’s also like Jews believe Israel can have nukes but not Iran.

Anyway, the Jewish contradiction of God, Truth, and Power wasn’t exactly stable. Indeed, it was radioactive. How can a people come up with an idea of the one and only God but insist this God serves only Jews even as He rules over all? And why would He make a special promise to Jews but not to any other people? How can such a singular and universal God be cuffed to one people? Now, this contradiction didn’t matter so much when most gentiles just ignored Jews and showed no interest in Jewish spiritual ideas. Indeed, for the longest time, the Romans scoffed at Jewish pretensions. The Roman way was to just let the Jews be as long as they paid their taxes. I mean what did it matter to gentiles or to Jews if Jewish faith belonged only with Jews? Even if Jews say there is only one God, your own pagan tribe can go on believing in your own gods.
But then, something happened. Jesus, His Disciples, and Paul decided to ‘democratize’ God’s rule. He would be made into a ‘propositional’ God, and the Jewish Biblical ‘constitution’ would be reinterpreted to mean that, from the beginning, the REAL prophecy of the Torah pointed to the arrival of Jesus who would make God’s justice and love equal to all the people of the world. This was bound to make the Jews shit, not least because the crazy idea was hatched by a bunch of Jews. I mean, the Old Testament is clearly Tribal and says God gave the Covenant to the Jews. But the New Testament claimed deeper understanding of sacred texts that interpreted events in the Old Testament as prophecy paving the way for Jesus the Messiah for all mankind. Jews reacted to this like Alan Dershowitz reacts to Norman Finkelstein or Philip Weiss.

Now, if Christianity had merely spread to some weak pagan tribes under Roman rule, it might not have amounted to much. But it eventually made inroads into the Roman elites, and they finally decided to make it the official and then the ONLY faith in the land. This meant that the universal vision of Jesus would have the backing of universal military might. The word and the sword would work together. Now, why were the Romans finally attracted to Christianity? Outwardly, one might say some Romans were moved by the story of Jesus, His love, His sacrifice, His Resurrection, His message of peace and justice, His promise of afterlife to the virtuous and redeemed. But there was surely another reason. Through Jesus, Romans could claim to have the blessing of the most powerful conception of God ever. So, the message of Jesus’ love was really a cover for what REALLY attracted the Romans to the new faith. Its God was the most powerfully conceived deity in the universe. Compared to Him, Jupiter was but a gopher. Indeed, all the pagan Roman gods combined didn’t amount to pack of prairie dogs compared to the Jewish conception of God. After all, the Roman gods weren’t all powerful. They weren’t around at the beginning of time. They have to negotiate with other gods since each power as limited powers. In contrast, the Jewish God is infinite, eternal, all-encompassing, all-knowing, all-powerful, and everything under and over the sun. Romans had always been dissatisfied with their own gods because they were limited in form and power. For a people hellbent on conquering all the known world, their gods just didn’t keep up with the pace. It was like having a rock band where the lead guitarist played only acoustic. For them to really make it big, they would need a Jimmi Page or Eric Clapner as electric guitar god. Likewise, if Romans were to be masters of all, they needed to follow a God who was the ruler of all. This way, Romans could not only own all of earth but all of heaven. They would conquer not only bodies but souls.

And this is when things got really serious for Jews. It was one thing to be live under pagan Roman rule. But when Romans had the Jewish God as their own and not only spread the faith among Romans but all peoples within the Empire, Jews really needed to hold onto the covenant to remain a special people. Prior to the spread of Christianity, the special relation between Jews and God could be maintained simply because non-Jews showed little or no interest in Jewish culture or faith. But once the Jewish concept of God went nuclear, exploded, and spread all over the world, it was only the Covenant that assured them a fallout shelter... like the one that the school-master is trying to open at the end of Coen Brothers’ SERIOUS MAN as a tornado approaches. Without that Covenant, Jews could have been swept up with the rest of humanity in the new faith and become scattered, assimilated, and lost among so many other tribes.

Now, what does this have to do with White folks? It’s a question of survival. When the Jewish God was universalized, how were Jews able to survive as a people and culture? Because, despite the fact that Jews and Christians(and later Muslims) worshiped the same God, only Jews had the Covenant that made them feel that they and only they had a special contract with God. So, in the end, it didn’t matter to Jews if their God went over to gentiles who called themselves Christians or Muslims. What mattered was that Jews could carry on with their ancient conviction that, even if God rules over all of mankind and shows His love to them, only the Jews have a special covenant with Him.
Of course, Christians and Muslims could tell themselves that Jews are deluded, that the Jewish Covenant was broken with the coming of Jesus, and that Jews are just so full of shi* with their conceit of a special Covenant. Also, how could Jews compete with growing numbers of Christians and Muslims — as both encouraged conversion among all humanity around the world — when Jews, who favor Covenant over Conversion, remained fixed in number and expanded only by the slow process of childbirth? And yet, the lack of a special covenant among Christians and Muslims meant that their power would be diffuse, divided, and confused than concentrated. Because Jews were a family of people, their Covenant bound their shared blood with God. In contrast, precisely because Christians and Muslims came to comprise such large populations, they couldn’t agree on much of anything. So, Catholics and Protestants got to fighting. And Shias and Sunnis got to hating each other. Also, even if the faithful were all of one sect or denomination, they could be divided along race. It’s like white Christians, black Christians, and Mexican Christians never had much in common, and each people invoked God for totally different purposes.
But because Christians, especially white ones for some reason, theoretically identify with and care for all fellow Christians regardless of race, creed, or color, their sense of white identity and interests grew weaker. Also, try as they might, even with the utmost goodwill, to connect with non-whites as fellow Christians or possible converts, there wasn’t much that whites felt in common with non-whites. In contrast, Jews were compact and united, relatively speaking, and all the more remarkable considering that they had to survive as minorities in exile and scattered all over the Middle East and Europe. Jewish power was like a city where the population is closely packed together. The Covenant provided Jews, even in exile, with a sense of shared blood and purpose. So, some Jews could be in Poland, some Jews could be in Germany, some Jews could be in Italy, some Jews could be in Iran, and etc., but the Covenant made them feel close even though they were so distant from one another and unlikely to ever meet one another. But as long as the Covenant existed, there was the Israel of the heart even before there was Israel of the feet that called on World Jewry to come together in family unification. Now, consider the Japanese in contrast. Because they have no Covenant, they can easily become estranged from one another. Japanese in America just become Americanized and ridiculous like Yoko Ono. And when Japanese who’d settled in Brazil returned to Japan, the Japanese people didn’t relate to them, and they didn’t relate to Japanese people. And in neighboring Korea, there is hardly any passion for national reunification because, lacking a national Covenant, Koreans don’t feel very close to one another despite their long history of having survived as one people and culture. And have you seen Josef Stalin’s granddaughter recently? That Russo-Georgian idiot, having no real grounding in meaningful identity or heritage, has degenerated into an idiot teen-wanna-be. And of course, Jews who lose a meaningful sense of Jewishness are also likely to lose it and turn into flotsam and jetsam.

For a long long time, there was a kind of defacto covenant between Europeans and Christianity. Even though the origins of Christianity are in the Middle East and even though the faith spread all over Near East and North Africa, the eventual triumph of Islam turned those areas into Islamosphere. Had those parts remained Christian, the history of Christianity for the first 1,500 yrs might have been bi- or tri-racial. But because Arabs and other non-whites became Muslim, Christianity became mostly a mono-racial power in conflict with Muslims who were not only different in both faith and face. As such, there was no danger of the Vatican being overrun with a bunch of darkies and swarthers. A blackamoor like Othello was an exception than the rule in most of Europe except in parts that had been colonized by North Africans for a spell.

Had Europe kept to itself, its people-culture-religion may have remained all-in-the-family. But for a host of reasons, the West came to dominate all the Rest. Indeed, the Western Way became so dominant and so pervasive that people all around the world don’t even realize how Westernized they’ve become in terms of their dress, technology, eating habits, and use of time. This Triumph of the West can be a matter of pride for Europeans(and white Americans are really just transplanted Europeans), but as with the Romans who conquered everyone but then got conquered by everyone, there is a good chance that whites will lose their way precisely because the Western Way has become the World Way. Because the West did so much to transform the world, there is this idea that the world should not only learn from the West but come to the West, become part of the West, and constitute the New Way. So, non-whites should abandon their way to join the Western Way as the only World Way, and in turn, whites should abandon their identity to accommodate all the non-whites who want to be part of the Western way. So, non-whites lose their culture to become Western, and whites lose their race to universalize the Western Way.

Obviously, this is a recipe for disaster for the white race, white heritage, and white territoriality. The current globalism is a pipe dream. It’s one thing to find John Lennon’s "Imagine" to be a nice in melody and sentiment, but it’s quite another to form a world order on the basis of such tripe, all the more so when so much that is now called ‘Western’ is really Jewish supremacist, Afro-thuggery, and Homomaniacal. Therefore, it is of the greatest essence that white people look deep into their hearts and history to formulate a covenant for themselves in the current globalized order. We cannot put the genie of universalism back in the bottle. The Western Way of math, science, economics, technology, pop culture, and dress have become universalized. Also, all the world has caught onto the concept of ‘human rights’, and there is no going back from English being a World Language. Just like what had been unique to the Jews became universalized through Christianity, what had been unique to the West has become universalized through Western military power, communication, free trade, pop culture, media, and academia, much of it controlled by Jews. When so much that had been uniquely white had been made rendered worldwide, how can anything uniquely European survive. This is where it requires individual with leaps and depths of imagination and vision to formulate a unique covenant between white people and the destiny of the world.

Even when the Jewish God became a World God, Jews survived as a people and culture by doubling down on their Covenant that said their relationship to God was special. So, even as Jews recognized how God could be revered and worshiped by peoples all over the world, they maintained that they had a special connection to God that was unlike any other. Then, likewise, whites people need to come up with some way to believe that even though the Western Way has become the World Way, there are still things so deeply unique and special in being white that white folks and only white folks have this Covenant with the Western World Way.