Some people have noted that blacks have achieved least in the creation of civilization, complex societies, and high culture. And yet, maybe in a certain sense, blacks could take pride in not having been able to create Wakandas. After all, for every gain, there is a loss. And for every loss, there is a gain.
To create civilization, the slavish genes have to outnumber the savage genes. Obviously, slavish dogs are easier to control and handle than wolves. And yet, wolves are freer, wilder, and more robust. Dogs are more useful, more cooperative, and gentler, but they are comparatively wussier creatures than wolves.
The races that created civilization needed to be more slavish. Maybe natural forces, such as extreme cold that necessitated closer cooperation and delaying of gratification, made them more slavish, and then perhaps, 'civilizational' factors compounded the slavishness by weeding out the savage genes by execution or exile. So, as a community, such people could achieve more collectively, but this came at the cost of individual savage gene that was more robust, rambunctious, colorful, exuberant, and etc.
It’s like Chinese and Japanese built high civilizations, but they regarded by Modern Pop Cultural standards as colorless, mostly skin-and-bones, timid & sheepish, and not very good at singing, dancing, and sports. They are regarded as akin to dickless space aliens who appear at the end of CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND. The natives of Mexico may have built the great city of Tenochtitlan, but their descendants are deemed a dull, timid, and sheepish bunch. In order for them to have built civilization, they had to be have been more slavish than savage. (Granted, slave-made complex civilizations could carry out savage deeds like human sacrifice, but that's not the kind of savagery we are talking about. Savagery in our context means a primitive level of human existence and culture.)
Now, compare the wolfish Mongols with the doggish Chinese. Mongols, by Asian standards, are big & robust and have barbarian souls. They don’t like to take shit from anyone. They preferred to sack and loot other civilizations than build their own, but there’ something vital about their character, duly noted in the novel and movie WOLF TOTEM by a Chinese author who lamented that his Han tribe, in building civilization and establishing order, lost something vital and natural that the Mongols still possessed. For sure, Mongols in Sumo summarily bounce Japanese guys off the 'dojo' like ping pong balls. Though both Mongol and Japanese societies were warrior-centered, Mongols prized the robust and hale rider-hunter who took charge of things. In contrast, samurai favored the obedient subordinate and ruthlessly executed those who exhibited independent streaks; thus, a vital element of human nature was weeded out of the Japanese gene pool. This made the Japanese more cooperative and mindful of others, but it also made them duller and more neurotic. This is why so many Japanese are like the character Yohei in SEVEN SAMURAI.
Pitiful Yohei, the typical Japanese Male.
Because Negroes failed to develop civilization, they came to be subjugated by other races with superior organization, technology, and culture. And they became slaves in Arabia and the New World. But even if historical and economic circumstances made them more likely to be slaves, their nature was less suited for slavery(at least in a complex order). Blacks have more savage genes than slavish genes. From a modern social perspective, the black savage gene has been problematic because it made too many Negroes run wild and act like lunatics. But countless people also find it vibrant, exciting, manly, sexy, badass, and etc. Look at the worldwide success of rap music, reggae, and other black-infected pop music. And blacks have dominated so many of the world's most popular sports. No one watches Chinese sports outside China, but many millions of Chinese love to watch the NBA where big ass Negroes dunk the balls while being cheered by blonde women cheerleaders who now salivate over big muscular Negroes who be seen as the superior males.
Among all the arts, music is the most spontaneous and powerful, and blacks have been, pound for pound, the most dominant force in pop music in the 20th century with their contribution to or invention of blues, jazz, rock n roll, soul, reggae, rap, and etc. Such music arose from the savage genes, and it turns a lot of people on. Even though so-called 'black music' of the 20th century would not exist without white influence, input, and instruments, one could argue that the core energy is the black fire. It's like gasoline is useless without an engine, wheels, and other parts of the car, but it is the fuel that fires up the engine. So, even though something like Rock music owes a great deal to white contribution, much of its raw fuel is black coal. White influence gave it structure and style, but the core energy of beat, rhythm, and soaring/scouring vocals owes to something particular to blacks. (Similarly, much of the power in classical music owes to the Germanic soul that added an especially potent mix to the musical form invented by others.) In contrast, the world community is far less interested in the slavish-genes-music of, say, Mexicans or Chinese. Now, a musicologist could argue that there are no objective standards by which to argue that some music is 'better' than others. Also, popular doesn't necessarily mean better. Fast food is more popular than fancy food, but is it better? TRANSFORMERS made more money than worthier films, but it's certainly not better. And yet, there have been lots of great black music(and white rock fueled by black coal) that managed to be both popular and inspired, and that surely counts for something. As for rap, even though people like myself detest it as attitude and expression, there is no denying its appeal as a means of forceful expression that many find infectious.
So, in some ways, blacks may take pride in not having been able to build the Pyramids of Egypt -- most Ancient Egyptians were not black-black -- and the Great Wall of China. They were too independent-willed, too 'badass', and too wild to be subjugated into hauling bricks to build stuff for oppressive kings and queens. They preferred to run wild & free and chuck spears at hippos and then run from hippos when hippos had enough of the Negroes acting wild and funky.
For every gain, there’s a loss. Chinese may have built a great civilization, but look how scrawny they became. Non-Asian women feel no excitement about Chinese men, and just about any good-looking Chinese woman in the US would rather marry anyone but the men of her own race. Asian women are the Story of the Horniness of Women with Hots for Bigger/Tougher warriors. http://dailybruin.com/2012/11/29/rally-responds-to-incidents-of-hate-speech_1129_1129/ Despite the matter of Asians having higher IQ than blacks, if a white guy were presented with a chance to become a Negro or a yellow, he would likely prefer to be Long Dong Silver than Wong Dong Lee. Consider the first part of the animation movie HEAVY METAL where a white guy enters the body of a black guy and turns into a warrior-stud who humps white women. It was cuck-fantasy before cuckery took off. And all those white college boys cheer for black athletes as demigods that they wish to be. And the movie GET OUT is about how Liberal Whites actually see blacks as so superior that they want to kill blacks to take over black bodies. While whites may feel that Asian-ness is preferable on the cerebral level, most people's immediate responses tend to be visceral than intellectual. One can admire an athlete right away, whereas it takes time to appreciate a writer, scientist, or an artist. A woman can be turned on by a tough guy right away, whereas it takes time for a woman to appreciate an unexciting guy who happens to have good qualities as friend and companion. It's the same with men in how they react to women. Any man can look at a 'sexy babe' and be turned on immediately, but it will take some time to appreciate a homely woman who happens to have good qualities.
Animation Movie HEAVY METAL where a white boy enters a body of a black guy to hump white women.
Humanity operates, for good or ill, according to three main modalities: Convenience, Conversion, and Convulsion.
Civilization greatly improved the means of Convenience, and this has been especially true of the West(that came to change the Rest). Think of all the great Western scientists and techno-inventors who created stuff like cars, refrigerators, airplanes, machines, toilets, and etc, etc, that made life so much easier, more comfortable, and more convenient. We owe so much to such individuals, but how come they are almost invisible to us? Because the purpose of convenience is to serve us and make us forget it even exists. We don’t think about the technology of plumbing every time we use the faucet to drink water or flush the toilet. We are very glad to have such things, and they make life easier. But they don’t turn us on. They make life more bearable but not more pleasurable. They lessen the pain but don't intensify the pleasure. Once they've become a part of our lives, we really notice them ONLY WHEN they malfunction or are denied to us. Who thinks about water or electricity except when the service fails?
Also, they don't move us sensually or emotionally. Once the air conditioner is on, we hardly think about it or respond to it, any more than we think about the very oxygen we breathe, essential as it is. Elevators are useful but we don’t get excited about being inside one. Western civilization has been the king of convenience, but how many white folks are reading books about past inventors to get their jollies? Think of the guy who invented modern textile technology. He did something very great. But I don’t know his name and likely neither do you. Machines are essential for they exist to serve us and make life more convenient. And convenience is very very nice, even essential, but it’s utilitarian, not 'orgasmic'.
Then there is the matter of Conversion. It comes alive in the realm of ideas and emotions, the mind and heart. Religions and ideologies are 'conversionary'. Religions and ideology may require time and patience for us to appreciate. To truly understand Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Taoism, or whatever, we have to calm & control ourselves and do some intense reading & contemplating. And there is the need for prayer and meditation. Thus, we gain inspiration and the passion to serve something higher and greater than ourselves.
To understand ideologies, we have to attend meetings, read certain texts, and join discussions. In the end, religions or ideologies may be very fulfilling and transforming. They may provide us with the meaning of life, a sense of truth and righteousness, and the possibility of redemption and salvation. They make us realize that there’s a higher meaning to life, i.e. life isn’t just about material well-being but about spiritual, moral, and/or intellectual pursuit of truth.
The Middle East, Asia, and Europe achieved great things in 'conversionarity'. Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, Greek philosophy, Confucianism, and many schools of thoughts arose from those civilizations. Conversionary stuff may not make life easier in the physical/literal sense -- as the instruments of convenience do -- , but they are compelling because they imbue us with a sense of truth and meaning. And this is why some Muslims in the West still cling to their Old Faiteh. Sure, the Modern West offers a great deal in terms of convenience -- medicine, technology, and etc -- , but it’s not very meaningful to worship a refrigerator, ponder the significance of carburetors, or meditate on the truth of toilets. People find meaning by thinking about God, myths, high art, philosophy(ultimate meaning of life), history, moral progress, and etc.
When it came to matters of Convenience and Conversion, black African produced next to nothing. No great science/technology/invention. No great religion, philosophy, ideology, or school of thought.
But then, there is the power of Convulsion. Human eyes, ears, tongue, genitalia, and certain parts of the skin are all erogenous-like zones. Convenience makes the body comfortable. Conversion makes hearts and minds feel meaningful. But it’s convulsion that makes the erogenous-like senses explode like Juicy Fruit gum and go crazy.
Convenience is like a perfect chair that makes the ass comfortable. Conversion is the book one holds while sitting on the chair. In contrast, convulsion may not offer any long-term utility or any deep meaning, but it provides intense explosions of pleasure. It’s like a vibrator-dildo up a nympho’s pooter(though some might call it cooter).
Now, we could argue that humanity should be wiser and favor convenience and conversion over convulsion, but the power of pleasure(especially in our electronically-connected world overflowing with leisure) is so powerful for a lot of people that they’ve come to favor convulsion over all else. It’s like if you give cocaine to a monkey, it will just want more doses. It’s like once a boy or girl experiences orgasm, he or she has to look for more and more. It’s like once young ones listen to pop music, they don’t wanna do anything else but listen to more. It’s like sports addicts are crazy about sports 24/7. It's no wonder that Soma and Feelies are so crucial to the world of Aldous Huxley's BRAVE NEW WORLD. The Power figured that, instead of maintaining order through strict repression and regimen, people could be better-managed by making them carry out certain tasks in allotted roles for routine rewards of intense pleasure.
It is in the areas of convulsion that blacks pose the greatest threat to the white race. Though convulsion may be the opposite of convenience and conversion, paradoxically the power of convulsion became magnified because of the success of convenience and conversion. The Western triumph in convenience led to huge technological advances. As people in the West have all the basic amenities and own TVs/stereos/computers, their minds are barely fixated on convenience(even as their lives owe so much to it). In the 19th century, white farmers struggled to eke out a living. They had to grow food, and their minds were occupied with making life easier by gaining greater convenience with improved methods of agriculture and tool-making. Also, as there were no radios, TV, and stereos, fun and pleasure amounted to local folk dances and get-togethers where parents and preachers kept a watchful eye on the young ones(who had to grow fast into adulthood to take on backbreaking labor). And as morality and spirituality of Conversion guided society, sexuality was carefully regulated.
But today, we have enough food and water. We don’t worry about disease and cold. Also, religion has faded due to science, wealth, and education. And grand ideologies such as Marxism have lost their appeal in a world with far less need, one where even poor people get fat. If anything, 'idology'(the politics of idolatry) has supplanted ideology. Our social mores are more libertarian and freewheeling and hedonistic. So, people take basic necessities for granted and instead seek wild/intense pleasure through sports, music, movies, TV, porn, dating-services(aka hookups), and free sex.
Conversion also paved the way for the rise of convulsion. How? Because conversion-dialectic led to the emergence of the kind of political/social/moral philosophies that best served to create and maintain modern societies of peace, law, and order. Once such socio-economic-political success was achieved, people began to take ideas for granted. After all, how many people regularly read the documents of the Founding Fathers? How many read up on the history of advancement of law and ethics from Roman times to the present? Though some people do find intellectual fulfillment in reading and learning, most people don’t much care about ideas as long as life is pretty good for them. What passed for ‘ideas’ since the 'End of History' has been stuff like WWG(world war gay) and WWT(world war tranny).
But one thing people are mad about is pleasure and more pleasure. If you’re dying of thirst, a glass of water will suffice as pleasure, mainly to overcome the pain of thirst. But if you have all the water in the world, you want something like an ice cold beer or soda pop with the fizzle.
Since the success of the Modern West put people’s minds off convenience and ideas -- as their utility is taken for granted -- , people are looking for more and more pleasure. People on a cruise ship don't think about the engines, steering, plumbing, and myriad other things that make the trip possible. They are fixated on fun. Likewise, how many people watching a movie think about the machinery of film-making and film-projection? They are just fixated on the fun images on screen. How many people think about how their smart-phones work and what went into them in terms of ingenuity and innovation? They just want to trade 'butt pics' and 'dick pics'.
And it is in the area of convulsion that Negroes are beginning to take over.
Look at sports. Muscled Negroes dominate. White girls cheer for black studs and line up to have sex with Mandingos who give them the biggest orgasms. White boys in the stands cheer for black athletes like crazy. The emotional response of white male fans to black athletics is almost 'orgasmic'. White boys turn quasi-homo in their worship of black muscle and mastery on the field. They act like white cheerleaders. They scream their heads off like they’re having orgasms all over their bodies.
And consider the worldwide potency of rap music. Black guys sing about how badass they be, about how white girls worship their muscle and big dongs. And white girls have conniptions listening to that stuff. They ‘twerk’ their asses to rap as if they’re mounting big Negroes. And white boys listen to that stuff too and get quasi-homo jollies in their worship of black toughness and cool thug attitude. White rock critics sing hosannas to Kanye West. White guys try to emulate black rappers. White homo guys look for black guys to pump them in the ass.
Intense sexual pleasure are found through feelings of conquest or feelings of submission. White girls and white guys find great orgasmic pleasure in submitting to the Negro as Nature's Master(and in vicariously ‘sharing’ the conquest by the Negroes). There was even an article in DETAILS mag about how white elites are having 'mandingoes' hump their wives on their own beds. White wives must have the big Negro, and white guys can get off only by submission fantasies before black guys as the superior race over wussy whites. This has now caught on in Japan, with clubs where small Japanese men gather to see big black Americans hump Japanese women who, having caught jungle fever, are having more kids with black men and producing offspring who dominate Japanese sports and defeat weaker yellow guys.
The power of convulsion is huge in the current Globo-Homo-Afro-Shlomo order. It’s like WUTHERING HEIGHTS where some hussy runs off with Heathcliff. Or Kate Chopin's THE AWAKENING which I haven’t read but I think it’s about some white woman getting turned on by a mulatto. Or Jane Campion’s silly PIANO where some white hussy goes off with some white guy who’s gone native and acts the Maori warrior. She feels ‘liberated’ by sexually submitting to the ‘savage’.
We may admire Japanese contribution to the technology of convenience, but in the area of convulsion, Japan fails at least in its male-dom. East Asians make the bulk of world electronics, but what most people watch through TV, computer, and smartphone screens are whites and blacks than Asians(who are more likely to be depicted in cartoon form in anime or manga). Japanese males are seen as a bunch of 'scrawns'. Hard-working drones who make good radios but who count for zero in convulsion factor. On the other hand, Japanese women may offer some convulsion goodies since men prefer women who are feminine, and it seems men all over the world have fantasies about me-so-horny mama-sans.
Negroes achieved zero in convenience and conversion, but they seem to be masters of convulsion. And yet, this triumph of the Negro has been made possible by Western triumph in convenience and convulsion. Western invention of electronics, TV, stereo, and etc., made black music accessible in the bed room of every white boy and white girl. Western moral-intellectual development led to the feelings of ‘white guilt’, and MLK-ology is the reigning ideology of White folks. And of course, it was the white-made transport systems and economies of scale that led to whites going to Africa AND blacks coming to the West. Without the triumph of convenience, whites would have remained in the white world, and blacks would remained in the black world.
So, even though blacks are only really good at thuggery, humpery, and jiveassery, their power in these areas have been magnified as pleasure-drugs all over the globe through Western media. And ease of travel have sent Negroes all over the world to hump women of all color.
Pleasure may be fleeting, but it is intense(just look at the loonies who totally lose their minds during Santana’s ‘Soul Sacrifice’ in WOODSTOCK), which is why some druggies are hopeless. Also, there is an endless barrage of pleasure-inducing sounds and images via countless devices that service pop culture. Junkies may know that the drugs that give them convulsions are destroying them, but they are so addicted to the pleasure, they gotta have more and more and more. It’s like the orgasmo-orb in Woody Allen’s SLEEPER.
Just look at the state of UK today. You still have elites who are well-mannered, well-read, and well-spoken(though all seem to be committed to Diversity and Vulgarization of Society), but the main cultural interest now revolves around convulsion, especially in relation to the Negro. Andrew Sullivan the homo may find meaning in books and surely appreciates modern conveniences(created by so many white scientists and inventors), but where does he find the greatest pleasure in life? By having some muscled big-donged Negro pump him in the ass. Milo shares that excitement as he's 'married' to a homo-Negro. That pretty much sums up the essence of what the British elites stand for nowadays.
Today, Jews control much of the Convenience industry(especially in high tech) and the Conversion industry(academia, media, publishing, etc). Control of sectors like Silicon valley and finance technology gives Jews tremendous amount of wealth. And with that money, they’ve bought up all the media and funded much of the academia. And they use their control over conversion-spheres to promote ‘white guilt’ as the main moral-spiritual 'idology' of the age.
And as Jews own much of sports, media, TV, music, and porn, they work in cahoots with Negroes to push the Negro dope or Negrope on white junkies who are totally addicted to orgasmic convulsions from sports, rap music, porn, and even watching one’s own wives humped by Negroes.
So, as we look to the future, the issue is no longer a matter of which people created the greatest civilizations but which people produce the biggest convulsions for humanity?
Though non-blacks created the greatest civilizations, the price they had to pay was the rise of slavish genes over savage genes. The higher degree of slavishness among whites, Near Easterners, Hindus, and yellows enabled them to build bigger cities and get along better and obey orders. But they also grew wussier, wimpier, doglike, Dan-Quayle-like, and David-Cameron-like. Without inspired leadership from above, most non-blacks fear to step forward and take action. In the past, British elites led the British masses in defense and aggression. Today, with the elites have been brainwashed by Jewish Conversion and/or addicted to Negro Convulsion, they no longer rouse up the British masses for racial solidarity and national power. Your average Briton, left to his own devices, would rather accept national suicide than give offense to others with 'nasty views' such as 'racism'. His instincts are more slavish than savage.
Just like Japanese built high civilization but get bumped around by bigger & tougher Mongols(who excite Japanese ladies who also run around Yokohama looking for Negro studs) in the Sumo 'dojo', white folks built greater civilization but at the cost of becoming dweebier and doglike, at least when compared to blacks.
Even though the dweeby and doggish naturally fear the wolfish and savage, they are also turned on by displays of wolfish or pitbull-ish prowess. It’s like dogs are more impressed by wolves than vice versa, and female dogs will could well have bigger orgasmic convulsions with male wolves... and in time male dogs will find their jollies as quasi-homo bitches of male wolves. Looking forward to the future of wolfish Negro males and doggish white males?
The French Empire unraveled after WWII. But it was not a total loss. The French colonialists reconnected with the National Core. They returned home to France. Back then, French colonialists had a place to go back to. But what is France today? It is a demographic colony of Muslims, sexual colony of Africa, and political colony of the Jews. And Netherlands doesn't lift a finger to save White Boer Farmers in South Africa. New Holland's identity is 'multi-culturalism', which means that it belongs more to Africans and Muslims than to the Dutch themselves. It is now a crime for the Dutch to say, "My country belongs to my people", but it is wonderful for Africans and Muslims to say "We have a right to colonize and take over Dutch lands and wombs."
In the end, true nationalism is defined by Core Nationalism. National identity, interests, and territory become confused and muddled with imperialism. As a people gain dominance of other peoples and their lands, their sense of national destiny becomes entwined with that of other peoples. Thus, distinctions between the National and Imperial become unsure and contradictory. As Amy Chua discussed in her concept of hyper-powers, the conquering/ruling people must be 'tolerant' and 'diverse' in order to maintain a great empire. While a determined people can use brute force to conquer weaker peoples, it is nearly impossible to rule over, with brute force alone, such vast lands inhabited by different peoples. In the case of American History, white people could just remove the relatively small number of native folks and create a White empire-nation. But most empires were about one people ruling over others who vastly outnumbered the ruling/conquering people. Also, even though the conquered peoples were relatively lacking in technology and organization, they were not hopeless primitives like the American Indians who had no chance against whites. So, to have an empire, the ruling people must be reasonably 'tolerant' and pro-'diversity' over the conquered peoples. Empires are inherently diverse since they are about a people conquering and ruling over other peoples of different races, cultures, and religions. Also, in order to win over collaborators(or, better yet, converts at least in religion or ideology), the ruling people must be reasonably 'tolerant' and offer carrots along with the sticks. Nazi Empire was doomed in the East because its plan was extermination/enslavement. But in a sick way, even Hitler understood historical truths. An empire can survive in only two ways: Via 'diversity' & 'tolerance' OR eradication & homogeneity. He understood that while D&T method was useful and effective, it was ultimately doomed. All D&T empires eventually faded from history. The only kind of permanently successful empire is where one people take over, effectively exterminate or crush the natives, and become the ruling majority. Anglos could achieve this in North America & Australia and Russians could accomplish this in Siberia because they were met with only sparsely populated primitive opposition. But it was a tall order for Germans to pull off such a campaign against the Soviet Union that, in 1941, had 170 million people and advanced civilization. Easier to kill a gopher than a bear. So, if the German Empire were to become permanent and last a 1000 yrs(in Hitler's prophetic dream), the German Empire had to effectively be a Big German Nation. Not so much Germans ruling over others but Germans as both rulers and ruled in the vast Eastern territories. D&T method, while effective, usually led to the conquerors being either expelled or absorbed by the larger native populations. Mongols were absorbed into non-Mongol peoples or, in time, driven out by native folks. Alexander's Macedonian and Greek rulers eventually faded into the local domains that they conquered. The Aryan Conquerors in India may have used an extreme and elaborate system of race-separation ideology to perpetuate rule over the natives permanently. But despite DNA studies showing lingering differences among the various castes, lots of Brahmins in India look dark like the natives. Over 1000 yrs, they've been absorbed far more than they'd like to admit. Libido will do that over time.
Anyway, under the policy of 'diversity' and 'tolerance', an empire can grow and flourish. Initially, the ruling people nevertheless maintain a sense of 'us' over 'them'. While the conquered 'them' are offered carrots, they are still in an inferior position vis-a-vis the conquering 'us'. But as time passes, the conquerors come to rely more on the conquered for materials and manpower. Also, among the conquered, some perform their duties so loyally that they are accepted into the conquering tribe. There have been some cases where, over time, the conquerors and conquered merged into one people. This was especially true IF the either the conquering people or conquered people(or both) had weak cultural identity. Mongols were fierce and aggressive but had a barbarian culture. As such, they could be absorbed into more complex cultures. Or when an elaborate culture conquers a weak/primitive culture, the latter joins the former. Christendom and Islamic World converted and absorbed many peoples. And long ago, a few gentile tribes were absorbed into the Jewish Tribe with a most powerful sense of culture rooted in the Covenant. The merge is usually doable IF the conquerors and conquered are of the same race despite cultural differences. Plenty of Germanic and Slavic barbarians became 'Romans' or 'Greeks'.
But when a powerful culture conquers powerful cultures, neither side is willing to be fully absorbed into the other culture. This is even truer if the peoples differ in race as well as in culture. Latin America is an interesting case. Because the natives mostly had weak cultures, they were absorbed into the conquering Latin Culture. They took on Spanish names and language. And they accepted Christianity. Now, if the natives of Central and South America were white, they might have just become ONE with the Spanish. But as they were brown, strong distinctions and separations remain between the conquerors and conquered despite the effective cultural 'latinization' of the whole continent.
At any rate, empire eventually confuses the distinctions between the conquerors and the conquered. This confusion is a double-edged sword. In some ways, it facilitates further integration between conquerors and conquered. If the conquerors come to identify more with imperial glory than with the national core, then they are bound to feel a closer bond with the conquered folks who've come to serve the empire. And if the conquered folks come to share in the pride of imperial glory, they are bound to look to conquerors not so much as foreign tyrants but rightful rulers. But this confusion also leads to all kinds of anxieties, paranoia, tensions, distrust, and resentment. Also, both sides realize that there has to be a limit to the merging of the two realms because there is the real danger of losing one's identity and culture forever. Then, it is hardly surprising that most empires faded in time. Latin America is in a strange kind of limbo state. In one way, it seems like a successful and permanent merging of conquerors and conquered. In other ways, it looks like an ongoing imperial project where something BIG might happen with drastic transformations in power politics.
Where nationalism becomes most vital and vivid is when empires fall apart. Such collapse finally decides what is Core Nationalism and Expansive Imperialism. It's like separating wheat from the chaff, the gold from the sand. Core Nationalism is muscular and lean, Expansive Imperialism is fat and round. An empire is like a person with excessive fat. He has eaten too much, and it has made him bigger. He carries a lot of weight, and can push others around. BUT, all that fat also serves as a burden. There are advantages to be sure. After all, a sumo wrestler gets a lot of leverage with the fat. But, he tires easily and has to keep eating and eating to maintain his size. Now, when a fatso decides to exercise and lose weight, does he shrink to nothingness? No, he will lose the fat, but he will reach a point where he is mostly lean muscle. That is the Core Person. Without all the fat, he may look diminished and won't win something like sumo matches, but he will feel healthier and lighter. So, if one wants to know what a fatso really looks like, the fatso must lose the weight. All the flab makes the fatso look like other fatsos. They are defined by fat that covers their body. But with exercise and healthy eating, a fatso will lose weight, and then he will really look like his true self.
This also goes for empire. Empire confuses the identity of a people. The conquering people may come to identify so much with the empire that they forget what they really are at the ethnic, cultural, and territorial core. Indeed, because they've come to covet the empire so much, they may feel that loss of empire will be the end of the world, the end of everything. But not so. Losing the empire finally reveals the Core Essence of the People and Culture. It is not total loss but loss of Imperial fat in exchange of re-emergence of the National musculature.
So, when the British lost their empire, they had their core in Great Britain. It still remained. After the French lost their empire, they had Core France, the land to which the French colonialists returned. When the Turks lost the Ottoman Empire, they no longer ruled over Arabs and Balkan folks, but they had the National Core in what is now Turkey. When the Japanese Empire collapsed in Continental Asia, there was still Core Japan. Austrians lost the empire, but they still had the Austrian Core. Russians lost the Soviet Empire but still have Core National Russia. And Germans lost their empire in WWII but still had the German national core.
And for the conquered peoples, the National Core remains even under Imperial Waters. Polish people and civilization were long submerged under Russian and Prussian Imperialism, but they remained as a steady rock that re-emerged once the empire subsided and receded from history. This was also true of the Greeks whose ethno-rock was long submerged under the Ottoman Imperial Sea.
So, true nationalism is Core Nationalism, and it reappears when a people lose the empire. They may be frightened that the loss of empire is loss of everything, but it's actually a realization of and a re-connection with the National Core. In the end, was it so tragic that the French in Indochina returned to France or the British in Kenya returned to Great Britain? Even with loss of Imperial Glory, there was National Integrity.
What is truly ominous and tragic about globalism is it is an attack on the Core itself. Apparently, it wasn't enough for the Brits and the French to lose their far-flung empires. They must lose their national cores as well. And not just them. According to PC, George Soros, and the UN, the attack on the Core must be universal. Even though Swedes and Poles didn't have overseas empires, they too must lose their cores. According to this article, even though Polish Conservatives mouth patriotic platitudes, they are collaborating with globo-homo capitalists to import tons of non-whites and spread Homomania everywhere. https://www.amren.com/features/2018/11/a-frank-assessment-of-nationalism-in-poland/ Also, rise of deracinating Pop Culture, anti-ethno-PC, and anti-life feminism have led to Child Dearth all over the Modern World. Women take jobs from men and then wonder why there aren't enough marriageable men around. It's because women took their jobs. Feminism is narrowly focused on female careerist empowerment while overlooking the fact that this leads to overall weakening of a people. While relative freedom for women was an advantage to the West, the West's greatest rise came when there was a balance between the ideal of equality and the reality of biology. Thus, Western women enjoyed more freedom and rights than women in other cultures, BUT they still performed their crucial biological functions as wives and mothers. This led to the triumph of the West. (If modern feminism had hit the West in the 18th century, there would have been no Rise of the West.) There was a sense of All-Empowerment for the entire society, and this required a complementary relationship between men and women. But materialistic feminism led to women seeing themselves as a separate and independent group apart from men. Instead of working with men to create a powerful society for all, women opted for the narrowest goals of personal/sexual entitlement. Of course, most women lost out in this order as only a handful women are going to succeed in the most glamorous fields coveted by most women addicted to celebrity and vanity. But the toxic mindset infected most women, and they lost all sense of what is GOOD FOR ALL or Mutual Empowerment. They just opted for the narrow empowerment of themselves as a separate group.
There was a time when even the loss of empire meant that a people would not lose all. Fall of empire meant that the conquered peoples regained(or conceived of) their own nationhood while the conquering peoples withdrew into their national core. Both sides got something. Liberation for the conquered, Re-connection for the conquerors. Imperialists returned home and reconnected with nation and kin... like Lawrence(of Arabia) who had enough of imperial ventures and returns home to Britain. Or the guys in THE DEER HUNTER who want to say goodbye to all that(imperialism) and return home where family and friends are. Fall of empire was like declaring bankruptcy. You lost lots of stuff, but you got to keep your core house and property. So, if you speculated in lots of bad real estate deals and got burned, you needn't lose your core home. But globalism says even the Core possession of a people/culture must be placed on the auction block or turned into something like a brothel. The culture and ideology of current UK is a whorehouse or a house-party. It is not a home where anyone would feel safe. In DUNKIRK, we see how the soldiers feel safe 'at home' as they make it across the channel. Today, London has been colonized by the Other. British Police looked the other way when girls were turned into sex slaves in Rotherham(or Brothelham). And yet, this is the the New Centrism, and anyone who calls for Core Nationalism is 'far right'... unless he happens to be an Israeli.
We are told endlessly that Global Warming will raise sea levels and submerge sea coasts all around the world. But even more alarming is the prospect of Global Swarming that may well submerge all the First World under the rising tides of Third World invasion egged on by globalist Jews.
In the video link above at 34:16, Richard Spencer says the reason why "THEY Hate us" is because there is a ‘great moral weight against (white people)’. True enough, but paradoxically, non-whites claim to ‘hate’ whites because they really love whites. Non-whites prefer whites over non-whites, even over their own kind. Asian-Indians would rather live with whites than with other Asian-Indians who shit all over and practice corruption on a massive scale. Chinese would rather live with whites(in US, Canada, or Australia) than with their own kind who are so corrupt and cruel. Also, Chinese women would much prefer to marry white/Jewish men and have white/Jewish kids than Chinese ones. Their sexual mentality is ‘No Dogs and Chinese Men Allowed’. Mexicans would rather live with gringo, work under gringo, and marry gringo than be with their own kind in Mexico, a nation known for corruption, mediocrity, and tacociousness. And we know Muslims and Africans would rather live with white Europeans than with their own kind. Muslims fear other Muslims in the Middle East. And Africans know how awful things are in black-run Africa. Also, they want white women(who now have jungle fever from too much rap music, black-dominated sports, and pornified culture). So, all these black men come to Europe hollering, ‘muh dick’ and ‘where da white women at?’ Now, if these peoples love white people so much — indeed, so much that they want to flee from their own nations, peoples, and cultures to be with whites in white or white-majority nations — , why do they spew so much anti-white vitriol? Partly, it is to hide their shame of preferring whites over their own kind. They don’t want to admit that they see whites as superior in governance, achievement, technology, morality, integrity, and beauty. So, they whine a lot about ‘white privilege’. But the bigger reason is that they need to suppress white identity, white pride, and white nationalism in order to gain access to the white world. After all, if whites felt pride of identity and ownership of their own nations, achievements, and genetic heritage, they would choose to guard, defend, and keep their domain for themselves. The ONLY way non-whites can gain access to the White World is by making whites feel ashamed of being white and having nice white things(that PC says must be shared with all the Worthless World). Of course, Jews understood this first and spearheaded PC. In order for Jews to have nice things and rule the world, they needed access to the White World. Also, they needed whites to go into White Submissivist mode to serve Jewish Supremacism. After all, if whites were to care about whiteness just like Jews care about Jewishness, whites will prioritize their own identity and interests. Then, Jewish Supremacism cannot prevail. For Jews to take over and gain hegemony, they've needed whites to welcome Jews, praise Jews, honor Jews, and feel morally guilty about Jews. So, all this anti-white vitriol from Jews is really the result of Jews loving whites. Jews want to have sex with whites. Jews want to appropriate ‘Aryan’ looks for their own half-Jewish kids. Indeed, look at Jewish immigration patterns, and Jews always favored white nations(especially those dominated by Anglos and Germanics) over all other nations. Jewish immigration-patterns were always white-preferist and white-supremacist. Jews wanted to follow where whites went, even when whites gained territory through invasions and 'genocide'. So, Jews love the fact that they gained total access to the white world. But in order to do so, they had to promote White Guilt and White Self-Loathing. Only if whites are made to feel guilty and sorry can they be manipulated to allow Jews and tons of non-whites into the White World.
So, whenever non-whites bitch about whites, whites should ask, "If you are so proud of your kind and hate us whites, why did you flee from your own nation, people, and culture to come live in the White World? Why do you want to have sex with whites and have white-looking kids? You must believe whites are superior to your own. You want to be with us. You’re more ‘white supremacist’ than we are."
At the 37:46 mark in the video link above, Spencer says the White Middle Class is being crushed in a 'pincer motion by the elites and the bottom, the Third World, Global South, and People of Color'. He is right in a broad sense, but it’s worth scrutinizing what is happening with greater detail. In the past, the elites would have been mostly Wasps, Anglo-Americans and others of Northern European heritage. The Other whites also gain entry into the elite realm by becoming Anglo-Americanized. Initially, even many Jews chose this route, becoming essentially Anglo-Jews. But at some point, Jews emerged not only as a counter-elite and separate elite(even a ‘hostile elite’ to the host elite, as Kevin Macdonald might characterize them) but as the New Elite. Thus, US went from a mono-elite power to a multi-elite power: Jews on top and Wasps below them. I’m thinking much of Jewish resentment had to do with aesthetics. They felt ‘uglier’ and felt resentful EVEN WHEN Wasps were being welcoming to them. Even when some Wasp country clubs let Jews in, Jews still felt as outsiders when they looked in the mirror. The other reason probably had to do with personality. Jews are feisty, pushy, and nasty. Wasps were into form and manners. Wasps could be insulting and dismissive too, but with a veneer of respectability. So, Jews saw themselves as honest hustlers versus Wasps who were about greed and privilege but put on genteel airs. Also, because of Wasp privilege, many not-too-bright Wasps made it to the top, whereas Jews had to be really smart to make the climb. So, many ambitious Jews of real talent from humble backgrounds found themselves in the company of not-too-bright Wasps in elite circles. Jews felt that those Wasps weren’t deserving of their power and status. And even though rich and successful Wasps outnumbered rich and successful Jews, in percentage terms Jews beat Wasps by a mile. After all, up to the 1980s, Wasps made up nearly half the population of the US whereas Jews were generally never more than 2%. In terms of pound-for-pound power, Jews were the top winners. But there was another factor that made Jews so much more powerful than Wasps. Jews concentrated on taking over the media that could make or break reputations. And via the Media, Jews made Shoah and American Slavery the two greatest evils the world has ever known. Now, anyone who knows history knows that genocides happened all over and all the time. Jews themselves were involved with mass killings when they gained power as Bolsheviks. Also, slavery wasn’t unique to White America. After all, Brazil imported 10x the slaves. And Africa had slavery for 10,000 yrs. And there were tyrannies and bloodbaths all over the world since time immemorial. So, why did Jews make Shoah and American Slavery so crucial to World Morality. Both were devised to undermine Northern European Christian Power. Jews perceived Wasps as their main rivals in prestige, privilege, power, wealth, and narrative. So, Jews had to clip the wings of Wasp pride. One clipped wing was Gentile Guilt over the Holocaust and the other clipped wing was the White Guilt over Black Slavery. So, even though the Wasp Bird was still bigger, it no longer had wings to fly with. In contrast, the Jewish canary still had wings and monopolized flight. But being only 2% of the population concentrated in elite brainy fields, Jews couldn’t maintain power without the cooperation of others, especially whites who made up most managers, operators, engineers, supervisors, workers, and etc. Because the white masses or the white middle would be less likely to take orders from a bunch of nasty Jews — even if the white hoi polloi were instilled with ‘gentile guilt’ — , Jews needed to form an alliance with the demoted Wasp elites whereby Wasps could keep the status but must surrender the real power. Though Jewish elites were the new champions, Wasps were still in the ranking as contenders. But instead of challenging the power of Jewish champion elites, they came to play a subordinate and subservient role. They would become like the comprador native elites of India and Hong Kong who dutifully served the British Imperialists who could be generous to those who submitted to Anglo-dominance. That way, Jews could use Wasp-White Elites as the face of American Power. Then, the White Middle was far more likely to follow Elite Policy even though it was concocted by Jews than by White Elites. Jews had the power but its face was still White-Elite. Jews mastered the art of using White Elites as a front for Jewish Power. But this skill was perfected over a long period as Jewish banking elites in Europe needed to operate behind the prestige of white monarchs and aristocrats. And when Jewish radicals were blacklisted in the anti-communist era of the 1950s, they often used fronts to sell their works and get their ideas across. (Of course, those Jewish communists were fully supportive of Stalinist mass-killings, and today, their descendants are totally for doxxing, firing, and blacklisting any white person who says NO to White Submissivism to Jewish Supremacism. Incidentally, the Wikipedia entry for THE FRONT goes to show how hypocritical and un-self-aware these weasly Jews are. These very Jews(who now say people’s lives should be destroyed for refusing to bake wedding cakes for homo fecal penetrators who desecrate marriage, for standing up for Palestinian dignity & freedom, and for saying NO to Jewish Supremacist Power) still wax romantic about how noble Jewish Communists were wronged by a ‘witch-hunt’. Of course, all this BS about Civil Liberties was really just a Jewish Front to cover up their radical hatred of White America. When Jews have the power, they have no qualms about using Lawfare and other means to shut down voices who say NO to Jewish Supremacism. What an utterly vile and disgusting people. Never trust Jews who don’t know the meaning of ‘principle’ and ‘honor’. It’s no wonder that the term ‘dirty Jew’ became part of the lexicon.)
Anyway, because the current US is multi-elite than mono-elite, it’s too simplistic to say the White Middle is caught between the pincer movement of High and Low. Rather, one problem is that the White Middle is pressed down by High and High: Jewish Champion Elites and White Contender Elites(or more like Cucktender Elites as they don’t challenge the power of the Champion Elites). Ideally, the White Elites should represent the White Middle. And there was a time when they used to. Both Theodore Roosevelt(on the Right) and Franklin Delano Roosevelt(on the Left) felt some degree of connection with the White Masses. Indeed, despite heavy Jewish representation in FDR’s administration, many Jewish proposals and demands were rebuffed. FDR used Jewish talent and connections, but he had no illusions about the nature of Jews. And even up to Richard Nixon, there was honest discussion of Jewish influence in the corridors of power. So, there was still a sense that White Elites should look out for the ‘Silent Majority’ and keep a watchful eye on the nasty Jews.
But over time, the Jewish Elites took total power. They did it not only by gaining great wealth & buying up whore politicians and by saturating the air waves with Fake News that distorted mass perception but by using the power of academia and iconography to instill White People with ‘white guilt’ and moral paralysis(or moralysis). But Guilt alone isn’t entirely effective because it’s a downer and depressing. After all, if Christianity only said ‘sinful humanity killed Jesus’, people would just feel sad and bad about the Faith. Instead, Christianity says Jesus nobly died for the sins of mankind, triumphed over death, entered Heaven, and returned with the message of Redemption and Salvation for those who’d accept His status as the Son of God. That added an element of light and joy to Christianity. Christianity has Easter and Christmas as well as the sad stuff about how Jesus was unjustly whupped and killed by humanity. So, Jews found it useful to promote black sexual culture. This way, whites would be both paralyzed with ‘white guilt’ about the Negro and feel ‘liberated’ by Negro rhythm and sexuality. Thus, whites got both the ‘guilt’ and ‘fever’ in regards to blacks. All those white women who feel ‘white guilt’ could find salvation via sex with black men and allowing their white wombs to be colonized by black seed. And all those white boys could be ‘redeemed’ by turning into hapless cucks who worship everything black: They cheer for black athletes who hump tons of white cheerleaders, they praise their kids for listening to rap music where black thugs sing about how white girls need to suck ‘muh dick’, and they even invite black guys to hump their own wives and girlfriends as this Daily Beast Article explains: https://www.thedailybeast.com/cuckolding-the-sex-fetish-for-intellectuals. Of course, ‘intellectuals’ is euphemism for Proggy White Urbanites.
So, it’s not just a matter of the White Middle being crushed by Top and Bottom. Rather, the White Middle lost the White Top to the Jewish Top. When white people used to be gloriously race-ist in the past, the white elites felt an affinity and common bond with the white masses. This was also why the victorious North in the Civil War didn’t push for black revenge and domination over Southern Whites. In the end, Northern Whites figured Southern Whites were still their racial brethren and didn’t deserve to be mass-raped by Negroes. Today, Jews still have this sense of top-middle-bottom solidarity among themselves. Jewish elites in Israel care about the Jewish middle and Jewish bottom. And they are proud of it. And in the US, even as Jews berate white identity and interests, they make lots of noises about how Jewishness is so great, how every American needs to support Israel, and how there’s nothing wrong with Jews caring about fellow Jews(all around the world ) and helping those Jews who have less. So, the Jewish Top cares about the Jewish Middle and Jewish Bottom. But the White Top no longer feels for the White Middle & Bottom because of the cult of White Guilt. If members of the White Top today spoke and acted like Teddy Roosevelt or Franklin Delano Roosevelt, their reputations would be destroyed in no time by the Jews. Donald Trump hasn’t explicitly said anything pro-white — even though he’s said plenty that specifically praised Jews and blacks — , but notice how Jews have been having conniptions about him as Literally Hitler. Why? It’s because Trump has refused to talk and act in the mode of White Guilt 24/7. Because of his lack of apologetics, Jews fear that Trumpism may trigger the waking up of the White Giant that may say NO and then eventually give the Middle Finger to Jewish Supremacist perfidy.
As long as White Guilt is at the center of the National Narrative, the White Top will remain subservient to Jews. After all, even the White Middle, as having been instructed by Jew-run academia and informed by Jew-run media, have bought into White Guilt. So, suppose a member of the White Elite decides to go ‘rogue’ and come out as a Pan-European Patriot. Jews would use all their media power to smear him as a ‘racist’, ‘anti-Semite’, and ‘Neo-Nazi’. Then, even the White Middle will denounce and reject him EVEN THOUGH he’s speaking in the interests of the vast majority of the White Race. Via control of Academia and Media, Jews have infected even the hearts and minds of the White Middle with PC crap about ‘white guilt’. Indeed, Jews have even gone so far as to infect the vast majority of whites with the idea that it’s a noble idea to desecrate the crucial bio-moral institution of marriage by associating it with Homo-Fecal-Penetration and Tranny-Penis-Cutting. If a white elite member came out in favor of restoring True Marriage, he would be rejected by the much-corrupted-and-soul-soiled White Middle whose main culture is Pop Culture and whose main ideology is PC(though somewhat milder than the PC of colleges). Why did the White Middle become so corrupted? Because the White Elites or the White Top totally surrendered to Jews. In the past, the White Top saw the dangers of rising Jewish Power and took measures to keep the Radicalism of the Tribe in check. But Jews kept on gaining in power. And then, by hammering a certain Narrative until White Guilt became the focal point of American Consciousness, it became difficult for White Elites to call out on Jewish Perfidy since any criticism of Jewish Power came to be associated with ‘antisemitism’ and ‘Nazism’. So, Jews could rant on and on about Wasps, but whites had to shut up about Jews. It’s like Gene Siskel could get away with talking crap about Anglo-American bankers. But imagine if a white film critic had said similar shit about Jews. He would have been canned there and then, even if the sentiments had been said between takes.
Because the Jewish Top owns the White Top(and because the Jew-run mass media and mass education mold the hearts and minds of the White Masses), we have a case of not only the High(Jewish) and the High(Wasp) versus the White Middle but also the High(Jewish) and the White Middle versus the White High. Even though there is no White High that openly stands for white identity and interests in the US — Donald Trump is not such a leader — , even if such were to emerge, it would most likely be rejected and even reviled by the White Middle that’s been so mentally warped by Jewish control of media and academia. Many in the White Middle sincerely believe Diversity & Inclusion trumps all else and worship nonsense like ‘gay marriage’. If so-called ‘conservative’ S. E. Cupp shed tears of joy upon the passing of ‘gay marriage’, imagine how proggy white middle women feel?
Furthermore, to speak of the White Middle is problematic because the Middle Class has been breaking up between the still-successful upper-middle-class and the declining sub-working class. There used to be a time when the idea of the ‘middle class’ had broad meaning, especially after WWII when there was a vast rise in wealth for many Americans. So, even the traditional working class believed they were part of the ‘middle class’. Having a blue-collar job didn’t mean you weren’t middle class. You could have a house, own cars, and send kids to decent schools where they rubbed shoulders with kids from more affluent families. So, there was a sense of a broad white middle class. But globalism made it possible for some tech-savvy member of the middle class to shoot up to the upper-middle class yuppie territory. As for the blue collar middle class folks, they sunk lower and lower as globalism and ‘free trade’ shipped tons of US jobs overseas. Also, Mass Invasion by Third World folks meant depressed wages in the US. So, with even decent-paying blue collar jobs disappearing across America, the working-class-as-middle-class increasingly became a pipe dream. And there was also the cultural degradation. When family, church, tradition, and patriotism were part of American blue collar life(or British blue collar life), working class folks had some degree of respectability in their lives. They had families. Fathers were fathers, mothers were mothers. They went to Church. They had a sense of ethnic community. But with the rise of radical individualism, youth culture, hedonism, Afro jiggity-ness, Jewish perversity, and feminist nastiness, the overall culture got trashier, more shameless and vulgar. And working class types were affected more negatively because their relatively inferior intelligence, irony, and sophistication made them easier prey to the culture of excess and degeneration. A smart and educated person is likely to act more sensible even if his values are decadent and hedonistic. In contrast, a less intelligent and less sophisticated person is more likely to dive head first into morass of filth and obscenity.
And then, due to Mass Invasion(aka immigration) and Affirmative Action, the Top became increasingly ‘diverse’. Silicon Valley is now filled with Asians(especially Hindus) as well as with Jews and whites. In political science departments of many elite colleges, there are peoples of all backgrounds. Therefore, white elites find themselves drawing closer with global elites of all races and cultures. Since they have little in common in terms of tradition, religion, and history, they draw together and circle around the banner of Globo-Afro-Homo Cult funded and promoted by the Empire of Judea. In the US, the Holy Three are Jews, blacks, and homos. And Jews are holy in the EU because of Shoah as neo-religion. But Jew-Worship is a tough sell outside the West. While the non-West will bow down to Jewish Power(because it is so formidable), they have no special love for Jews. And as they weren't responsible for WWII and the Holocaust, they have no reason to feel ‘guilty’. If anything, many people in Asia see Jews as the real rulers of America. And many in the Muslim world see Jews/Zionists as the biggest a**holes. And most in Africa see Jews as just ‘richer whites’ who should be milked as much as possible. Because Jewishness isn’t holy outside the West, Jews seek to use the front of Globo-Afro-Homo Cult to unify all of mankind under Jewish Hegemony. Why? Homos exist in all societies, so Jews can recruit homos in any nation to serve as their collaborators. Also, Homomania is flamboyant and fun for those who take part in it. It’s like globo-Mardi-Gras or globo-Samba-Carnival. As for Negroes, they got rap, sports, and sexuality-via-dong-and-booty. Also, their booming voices and howling hollers make their suffering just seem more intense and eloquent. People don’t like to hear complaints but may listen up if the complainers are orating like MLK or some Mountain-Sized-Negro-who-done-luv-a-wittle-white-mouse. Notice that both Zionists and Palestinians express their tribal pride & rage in the form of Rap, the biggest musical genre in the US. And both Zionists and Palestinians try to out-wave the Homo Flag in the West to be associated with homo-holiness. Even though Globo-Homo thing is Jewish-made and Jewish-funded, there are anti-Zionist forces who seek to appropriate the ‘holy’ symbol for themselves. (Apparently, it is holy in the Current Year to be associated with symbol of homo fecal penetration and tranny-penis-cutting.)
Anyway, Affirmative Action favors non-whites for elite positions. And Asians, Hindu and Yellow, are graduating from elite colleges and taking over many positions in media, academia, and middle management. So, when we say the Top and Bottom are crushing the Middle, it’s no longer so much the case of Jewish/White Top and Brown/Black bottom working against the White Middle. The White Middle has long cracked into Upper Middle Class(yuppies and their ilk) and the Sub-working-class(many of whom are not even gainfully employed). And the Top is becoming more brown with Affirmative Action favoring mulattos and with Mass Invasion making Asians rise above even the White Upper Middle Class. Also, the race-mixing at the top is creating all sorts of weird hybrids whose main identity is globo-power-and-privilege than anything else. When the privileged kids of Jews, whites, Hindus, Chinese, mulattoes, white Hispanics, and etc. attend the same elite institutions, the only thing they have in common is want of privilege, wealth, and status. They are Status Supremacists. They will sacrifice and attack anything that threatens their vaunted positions in society. Even though they will do ANYTHING to get more for themselves, they cover their tracks of self-interest with vapid talk of ‘progress’ premised on ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’, which are bogus because Diversity is the result of imperialism and Inclusion(which now means coercive inclusion) is just euphemism for Invasion. The US surely uses the Politics of Inclusion in the Middle East. Iraq, Libya, and Syria were all forced to allow the invasive ‘inclusion’ of US military might(that serve the interests of the Empire of Judea of course). Against all norms of International Law, the US military is now occupying large swaths of territory in Syria.
In the above video link at 42:57, Spencer says he’s not interested in being a ‘martyr’, and he conflates martyrdom with losing. He is wrong. A true martyr is a winner because his defeat is admired and remembered. It inspires others to take up the cause. A martyr is more than someone who just loses or is defeated. A martyr is who ‘loses’ beautifully and nobly, thereby inspiring others to follow in his footsteps. Jesus was certainly the most famous example. But it also goes for John Wayne’s character in SANDS OF IWO JIMA. A martyr doesn’t die in vain. He dies to inspire others to take up the cause with even greater fervor and commitment. And no movement can get anywhere without martyrs, without those who are willing to take the first bullets as they charge into battle.
The big irony is that Spencer IS a martyr whether he wants to admit it or not. Not in the classic sense as he is still alive and in one piece. But in terms of reputation and representation, he’s been targeted, cornered, tarred-and-feathered, shot with arrows, and nailed to the wall. Because of his commitment to the cause, he’s been punched in the face(with great fanfare from wicked Jews who are asking for their comeuppance), robbed of Constitutional Rights at Charlottesville, denied payment systems, kicked off Facebook(even though he did nothing to violate terms of policy), and harassed with Lawfare(again by wicked Jews). He can't raise funds for his trial because Jew-run payment systems deny him service(even though Americans are forced to pay taxes to send billions to Judeo-Nazi Israel). He can’t even pay for a drink at a bar with a credit card. His college speeches have been sabotaged by Antifa which effectively works as strongarm of SPLC that is funded by Jewish globalists. Whether Spencer wants to admit it or not, he’s been the lightning rod of Establishment Fury. Because the Power sees Spencer, rightly or wrongly, as the focal point of Alt Right Movement, it has been directing most of its fury at Spencer and those around him. The only reason why Spencer still has a Twitter account is because he’s been mild and moderate in his tweets. Especially after Charlottesville, how can anyone not say that Spencer and his inner circle have not been ‘martyred’? Whether Spencer accepts the label or not, he’s been hit hard. And he will continue to be hit hard as NOTHING he says or does henceforth will redeem his reputation in the eyes of the Power. He can only go forth by accepting his ‘martyrdom’ as a fact of life. Wherever he goes, he will carry the mark-of-cain because the Jew-run media see him as most dangerous. If Spencer is sensible, he should wear this mantle of martyrdom with pride. Perhaps, the reason for his unwillingness is due to an Anglo honor-code where it’s not considered dignified to play up one’s downtrodden status. Spencer’s pride can’t accept that he’s been licked. Also, his Nietzschean perspective makes him identify with the winner, victor, and hero while disdaining anyone who reeks of 'loserdom'. But sometimes, it makes more sense to take something from the Biblical play-book that is filled with martyrs. In the Greek myths, the heroes usually triumph and win. In Biblical tales, many fail and fall. Even the greatest Jewish king, David, failed in the end like King Arthur in EXCALIBUR. And before him, Moses was finally banished from the Promised Land by God. While Moses and David weren’t exactly martyrs, they were ultimately tragic vessels for something larger than themselves. And in the larger scope of things, Nietzscheanism fails because, like Ayn-Randianism, it’s all about the power of individuality. A true mastermind should, prophet-like, be able to see the bigger picture. While losing is usually futile and pathetic, the nobler kind of losing isn’t losing at all. It is setting the grounds for bigger victory down the line. The beauty of martyrdom means that the fall of one may inspire the rise of a million. While Alt Right people should not invite defeat, they must accept the fact that they will be met with defeat after defeat after defeat before they finally get something really going. It’s like the US space program had to suffer many setbacks before finally designing a rocket that could go into space. To move forward and upward, Alt Right will have to get used to ‘martyrdom’ like a cat wishing to cross to the other side of the river has to get used to getting wet.
Spencer says that speaking the truth & standing for principles but losing isn’t worth it. He says he’s in it to WIN. But, there is losing and then there is losing. There is losing because one has been exposed as wrong and fraudulent. That kind of losing is definitive. But there is losing because one has spoken the truth and aroused the ire of the Establishment that suppresses the truth. That kind of losing lays the groundwork for eventually winning. Alexander Solzhenitsyn was a loser who was later lionized as a moral winner. Also, one has to correctly gauge one’s options in the struggle. When truth, honesty, and integrity are the ONLY things one has, they must be used as the main weapon. If the Alt Right has representation in Deep State, Ivy League, Silicon Valley, Big Media, the Law Courts, and etc., then Spencer’s talk of WINNING may have credence. But the Alt Right has NOTHING in terms of the actual instruments of power. Spencer cannot even pay for a freaking drink at a bar. He can’t even rent out space at the Ronald Reagan building for an NPI conference. He can’t even rely on cops to defend his supporters from Antifa thugs. So, what is this talk of WINNING? With what? The only way to win, at least incrementally, is by focusing on what the Alt Right has available at the moment: Truth, Honesty, Integrity, and Courage via the platform of the Internet. If the Power has thrown you down a well and if you can’t climb back up, the only thing left is for you to shout out your message so that people around the well can hear you. Jews use ethno-totalitarian financial monopoly to deny people like Spencer, Jared Taylor, and Kevin MacDonald from collecting donations. Money is the water of the modern economy, and Jews have the power to shut off the flow to Pan-Europeanists just like Zionists cut off water to Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank. And of course, Jews cut off food and medicine to Iraq so that 100,000s of women and children died. Jews are that venal, wicked, heartless, and cruel.
Anyway, even if the dissidents of the Alt Right cannot raise money, they can still use the FREE services of the internet to get their ideas and views across far and wide. Even with so many Jew-run internet platforms shutting down so many voices, there are many more new voices speaking truth to power, and Jews can’t shut everyone down. And every time Jews shut another person down, word gets around that Jews do indeed control everything. In the end, Jewish Tyranny over white folks will be like Soviet control over Eastern Europeans. Total but seen for what it is. There will be so much hatred and resentment against Jews that when their fall comes, it will be as swift and absolute as the fall of Soviet Occupation of Eastern Europe. Until Alt-Tech comes into its own and ensures financial and networking for all peoples and voices, the Alt Right, Dissident Right, and Left-Right(aka Neo-Fascist National Humanism) will have to accept the fact that their only potent weapon is Speaking Truth to Power with Honesty, Truth, Courage, and Integrity. And ‘martyrdom’ will be a daily part of life. Spencer can deny his situation all he wants. The fact is he IS the most famous ‘martyr’ of the Alt Right. And if his admirers still stick with him, it is only because he didn’t turn cuck like Jack Hunter the Souuuuuuthern Avenger.
Also, even though Spencer talks about how ‘we need to gain power’, the first step in the road to power is by weakening the Power-that-be. It's like, before you construct a new building, the existing building has to be brought down first. Focus on destruction before construction.
As long as the Power-that-be is around, it will do everything to prevent the formation of Alt Right power. It will use financial tyranny, lawfare, bribery of cuck-politicians, Antifa goonery, Big Media lies, and etc. So, before Spencer thinks about increasing ‘our power’, he needs to first think about how to weaken ‘their power’. Since the Power-that-be is so immense in terms of cash, connections, and conspiracy, it can’t be taken down by going head to head. The smaller power will be defeated. Rather, the weaker power will have to assess the key vulnerabilities in the Power. It’s like Luke Skywalker shot lasers into a certain portal to blow up the Death Star. And it makes no sense to attack a giant bridge with a sledgehammer from the top. It will take forever. Rather, one must assess the structure of the bridge and the laws of gravity. One must find the key supportive points and place the explosives there. This is why even a few explosives can bring down an entire bridge. Though an immense structure, simple gravity will bring it all down if its critical supportive links are destroyed. Same thing with a boxer. Even the biggest and toughest boxer can be brought down by being hit ‘right on the button’. In the animal world, how does a leopard bring down an animal many times its size and weight? How come a cougar can sometimes kill a horse? Because even though a horse is much bigger and stronger, it has a vulnerable spot in the back of the neck. If a cougar can jump on the horse’s neck, cling tight, and sink its fangs into the spinal cord, the horse will come down. A horse has no means to reach the back of its neck with its hooves or teeth. If a cougar tries to go against a horse face-to-face, forget it.
So, before the Alt Right thinks in terms of ‘our power’, it needs to take a close look at the Power or ‘their power’. It needs to assess its overall structure and pinpoint its weak spots, the Achilles Heel. Samson understood this. He didn’t have to attack every square inch of the palace. He only needed to remove two columns underpinning the entire edifice. Since the Current Power is so moralistic, holier-than-thou, and virtue-signaling, it has set itself for de-legitimization and invalidation if its moral supports were to be removed. As power rises high, it comes under immense gravitational pressure. It becomes very expensive to maintain the moral justification for the power. (Indeed, why would the elites spend so much money on the truth when it can go against their interests? Only a fool would spend big money on unbiased and principled truth. If you're going to spend big bucks, make sure you get bang for the buck. Companies spend money on advertising to sell their products, not reveal truths that may undercut them. This is why much of the media and academia are Lie Factories. Big Money would not fund them just to be de-legitimized by them. Just about anything with a huge price-tag is a lie. Or, if it contains the ugly truth, it's about whatever or whomever that the Big Money hates. So, the Jew-run publishing industry produces many books about the Ugly Truth of Nazi Germans but precious little about the Ugly Truth of Jewish Bolshevik Mass Killers.) Alt Right must target the most vulnerable weak spots of Jewish Supremacist Power. With a little effort, it can easily be demonstrated that the US is really part of the Empire of Judea and that Jewish-Supremacism or Judeo-Nazism, not ‘white supremacism’, is the real animating force of American Power. And it can easily be demonstrated that the Current Elites of the Deep State are utterly corrupt, power-hungry, and demented. Obama can easily be outed as a flying-monkey-pet of Jews.
Obamonkey destroyed Libya and aided terrorists in Syria. (One wonders how many in the Deep State really believe in the ruling ideology. In THE WIZARD OF OZ, the henchmen surprisingly express their gratitude when the Wicked Witch is destroyed. They'd just been reluctant minions all along. Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead. Of late, many people, especially non-Jewish progs, seem happy to see the fall of men like Harvey Weinstein and Eric Schneiderman. Could many people in the Deep State just be cynical operators? But then, judging by James Comey, who gets all teary-eyed about tripe like TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, maybe these Deep State dufuses are really shallow maudlin fools who've drunken the Kool Aid of PC as their neo-religion.) Because there are so many moral strikes against the Globo-Homo Deep State neo-imperialism, the Alt Right has to present itself as essentially decent, honest, and moral. It is moral for a people to insist on their racial and cultural survival. If anything, it is the GLOB that is in neo-imperialist mode in wrecking the entire world through Zio-American military interference, financial terrorism, murderous sanctions, and demographic imperialism(especially against Europe that is filling up with millions of Africans and Muslims). Where Alt Right has failed is in compromising its own moral credit by allowing certain insane 14/88 Neo-Nazi types who are dumb or pathological enough to still admire Hitler. And while it’s totally necessary to speak truth to Jewish Power, spreading ugly lies about the Shoah and WWII is NOT okay. One of the few advantages a weaker power may have over the stronger power is in moral clarity. But even this is gone IF the Alt Right flirts with 14/88 clowns and lunatics. While Unite the Right had the Constitution on its side at Charlottesville, it should have sent out a message loud and clear that this New Right is not about Hitler-lovers, KKK, and such ilk. It failed to do that and got associated with scum who were easily exploited by the Jew-run media. A rich man has much more than a poor man, but the poor man can have morality and righteousness on his side. If the poor man relinquishes even that small but significant advantage by talking stupid ugly shit, then he shall remain powerless. (Incidentally, it was precisely because class-based leftism morally favored the have-lesses over the have-lots that the Jewish Globalists cooked up Homomania as the main banner of 'new leftism' because vain and fussy homos are on the side of the rich, famous, and wealthy. Jews handed the levers of morality, spirituality, and meaning to people such as the fruitkin in LAST EXIT TO BROOKLYN.)
In the above video link at 1 hr 16:48, Spencer says the Myth of American Democracy pretends as though the ‘rights’ and principles inscribed in the US Constitution have an existence and validity separate from the State. According to Spencer, that way of thinking — all too common among Conservatism Inc. types — is delusional and willfully naive. In truth, the ‘rights’ and ‘freedoms’ that we cherish exist ONLY BECAUSE of the power of the state that maintains and enforces order, security, contracts, and rule of law through implicit threat of violence, e.g. "If you don’t pay taxes, the government will send men to arrest you." In the most elemental sense, Spencer is correct of course. Humans are organisms prone to violence and aggression, and only a form of governance and organized force can maintain order and ‘harmony’ among the people. In a simple social order, it could be the cooperation of elders and warriors. In a more complex social order, it could be the coordination of power among the military caste, the priesthood, and merchant class. In the modern world, nations are ruled by the complex apparatus of the state with its elaborate laws enforced by a vast bureaucracy in cooperation with the governing elites, elected or appointed.
Still, Spencer’s conception sounds too much like the Marxism of Power. It is overly materialist and focuses excessively on the bare-naked workings of power. In truth, the human mind is also a realm of power. Philosophers envision ideal societies and ideal concepts. Therefore, form and meaning of the state will depend on thinkers who offer a vision. After all, if ideals and principles merely follow the logic of the state as an instrument of (Darth Vaderian)power, all societies should be more or less alike. After all, all social orders, be they European-Islamic-Asian-African-Hindu-etc., came into existence through violence that eventually led to the creation of a state-run ‘harmony’ or ‘balance’. And yet, why did Europe, Asia, Muslim World, Hindu World, and etc. develop such different political orders? And even in Europe itself, why did different states end up working differently for different ends? And this is where ideas really do matter. Unlike animals who can only contend with reality as it is and as they find it, humans can drastically and fundamentally change their own environment based on the power of the mind. And this requires feats of imagination, creativity of thought, moral philosophy, and grand vision. It’s like there has to be an architect before any building. Sure, the building is made through the confluence of money, building material, engineers, and workers who do the heavy lifting. And the building is maintained by those who carry out the security details. But it had to have been envisioned and designed by someone in the first place. So, the ‘dream’ does matter. The ability to dream and envision something that doesn’t exist is the ultimate kind of power. You can have all the money-men, engineers, and construction workers. Without an architect, there won’t be any building. Same goes for cinema. Sure, movies cannot exist without producers, studios, the technical crew, costume department, and so much more. The studio is like the ‘state’ in art of movie-making. Without the studio and all its material assets, movies cannot be made. However, a movie still originates with an idea of writer. There is no CASABLANCA without the original story. There is no THE GODFATHER without Mario Puzo’s novel and screenplay. And of course, the director, if he’s really great, isn’t merely a manager of the crew but an artist and ‘author’(or ‘auteur’) in his own right. Stanley Kubrick didn’t write the bulk of 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, essentially a literary creation of Arthur C. Clarke, BUT the end-result is the product of Kubrick's unique vision, i.e. only he could have made it what it is. No Kubrick, no 2001, just like No Lucas, No STAR WARS.
Therefore, focusing so much on the power of the state while dismissing its ideals and themes as mostly delusional is to ignore what makes humans special and unique. Humans have the POWER to envision things and conceptualize a better order. So, even though it takes real struggle and the institution of the state to actualize those ideas, the fact is grand plans are motivated, shaped, and directed by ideas. This is as true of empires as of nations. Mongols were empire-builders just like the Ottomans and the British. And yet, why did the Mongol-ruled world differ so much from the British-ruled world or the Ottoman-ruled world? Because the power of ideas and principles really do matter in shaping the direction of power. And also in limiting the scope of power. After all, as yet anyway, the rulers of the US haven’t yet been able to act exactly like Hitler or Stalin even though, of course, there are many in Deep State who would love to exterminate us(like it did with 100,000s of Iraqi women and children).
Even though it is the power of the state that guarantees certain ‘rights’, it is no less true that the struggle to build a certain kind of state-power has often been motivated by certain ideals. After all, if people only struggle for money and power, they’d just be gangsters. But in fact, despite the perennial reality of greed and self-interest, many peoples throughout history were motivated by higher ideals. It wasn’t just about power for power’s sake but power to create a better order based on certain principles. Why would so many communists have sacrificed their lives? Because they really did believe in their Cult of Justice.
Granted, all ideals are cynically manipulated by savvy operators... as illustrated in George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM. Also, power has its own logic in reasserting itself as the core dynamics of a social order. So, even if the most idealistic people were to gain power, they could gradually come to keep the power mainly for power-for-power’s-sake. They become accustomed to power, then addicted to power. Or they lack confidence in others to carry on with the ideals and try to rule as long as possible... as Mao and Castro did.
Jews came up with the most potent basis of power: The Covenant. It combined the highest ideal — blessing by the one and only God of all universe — with the base reality of blood and soil. The Way of God was to be contracted with the way of the Jewish pud. Thus, it became Godly for Jews to serve in the interests of their Tribal Power.
A people who think too abstractly without grounding in reality cannot amass much power. Buddhists were such people. Their ideas were too abstract and up in the clouds. Even though Buddhism became the official religion of certain powerful kingdoms, Buddhists themselves never became one of the great powers of the world.
In contrast, Mongols were very based in the realm of brutal power. They were nomadic-warriors without any great idea or vision. Their ambition was to conquer as much as possible and rape & pillage anything and anyone in their path. In terms of material power, they were among the greatest in human history. But lacking a higher ideal or noble vision, their power eventually faded and vanished once the Mongol victors grew lazy or just mixed with other peoples.
The lesson of Buddhists and Mongols is that high-idea-without-grounding-in-reality and brute-power-without-higher-ideals are both destined to fail as power. In contrast, the Jewish Covenant managed to forge a unity between High Concept and Base Reality. It combined Truth(God) and Tribe(Jews).
For the full video:
Eric Schneiderman, yet another vampiric Jew with Excessive Personality
Some people suggest that Antisemitism should be called ‘Judeophobia’, but it’d be wrong and misconceived, just like what goes by the name of ‘Russophobia’. (The current lunacy about Russia is hype and hysteria, not a phobia. Big difference.)
In the strictest sense, phobia is a medical condition. It isn’t a common case of mere dislike or fear. It is an extreme, irrational, and panicked fear of something harmless. The term should not be abused for political or ideological purposes. Its meaning should remain within the range of clinical psychology and psycho-social behavior. When you say someone is ‘phobic’ in the political context, you aren’t merely suggesting that he is anti-something. You are saying his antipathy is a mental disorder. Indeed, it is worse than a slur. A slur suggests someone is a bad person or an a**hole. In contrast, labeling someone with a phobia is to diagnose him as mentally ill or soul-sick. We know Jews in WWII hated and feared Nazis; so, does that mean Jews-in-hiding were Nazi-phobic? Of course not. They had sane and sound reasons for evading Nazis. Likewise, it is why the term ‘homophobia’ is totally bogus. Finding homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting is NOT phobic. It’s natural and normal.
So, what is a phobia? THIS is a phobia:
And even though Charles Grodin fakes it in MIDNIGHT RUN, extreme fear-of-flying is also a genuine phobia:
This is why ‘phobia’ has been effective as a political smear. It not only says your enemy is wrong in policy or position but sick in the head, heart, and soul. Cuckoo.
Critics of Jews, for the most part, are not ‘Judeophobes’. They are Judeo-Critics or Judeo-Skeptics. Furthermore, most people who are smeared as ‘Anti-Semites’ are more like Anxi-Semites, or people who are ANXIOUS about Jewish-Semitic Power.
Now, there are Judeo-Psychotics, the kind of people who are obsessed with Hitler-as-hero or Shoah-as-charade. The Nazi movement certainly had lots of Judeo-Psychotics, though, to be sure, their radicalism was an extreme reaction to Jewish pathologies that exploded with Bolshevism and Weimar decadence.
Most critics of Jews are not Shoah-desecrators. They are Shoah-atheists, which is to say they take a secular historical approach to the event. After all, the Shoah has been turned into a quasi-religion that cannot be discussed rationally and empirically. It must be ‘believed’ than studied. Indeed, there’s no shortage of Shoah-worshipers who insist that the 6 million number is sacrosanct and must never be ‘denied’. We are to adhere to ADL’s sacro-narrative just like good Catholics are supposed to obey and follow the positions of the Vatican.
Also, in regards to our problems with Jews, it has little to do with ancient traditions or beliefs. After all, would people care about Jewish culture or credo if Jews were without power and influence? We learn about the Jewish past to look for clues about Jewish Power in the present. If Jews today were a powerless people, we would be far less interested in their history, culture, and attitude(especially toward non-Jews).
Mongols were once a fearsome people who regarded the rest of humanity as LOOT to pillage and plunder. Today, Mongols still revere Genghis Khan, which suggests they aren’t the most sensitive or conscientious people when it comes to historical memory. But who cares? Mongols got no power except in wrestling in open fields among yaks and using eagles to hunt wolves. Modern Mongols pose no threat to Russia and China and Iran. So, even if Mongols may be unrepentant and still dream of the ‘good ole days’ of Genghis, it’s neither here nor there. If anything, most people would find it rather amusing, even endearing. Two million Mongols dreaming of taking over China or Russia on horseback. LOL.
Same logic applies to any people, including Jews. Suppose present Jews have an IQ average of 90. Suppose they got little power or wealth. Suppose they have the mild personality of Amish. Would it matter what they think? Suppose these Jews believe that it’d be wonderful to conquer all goyim, kill goy kids, and suck out their blood. Suppose their ideology is utterly diabolical. Should it alarm anyone? No, it wouldn’t matter because Jews wouldn’t have the power to make a difference in the world. It’s like American Indians were once frightening blood-thirsty childish savages who reveled in hacking skulls with tomahawks and whooping like wolves. But they got no power in our world. They just drink, watch Negroes on TV, and collect some cash from the local casino to buy some more booze. So, it doesn’t matter what Indians think. Their power doesn’t amount to a plate of beans.
In contrast, what Jews think does matter because of Jewish ability, intelligence, personality, and drive. Jews got chutzpah. Alan Dershowitz, an especially chutzpastic Jew, wrote a book by that title. Fun reading.
The matter of personality is crucial in understanding the Jewish Problem. Granted, personality alone isn’t sufficient to explain it. Southern Italians, Gypsies, and esp Greeks can be pretty nasty, tenacious, and devious in personality too. Just look at Joe Pesci in GOODFELLAS and CASINO. And when it comes to throwing tantrums, Greek women take the cake. Even Negroes never scared me as much as an angry Greek woman.
But Greek IQ and Southern Italian IQ’s aren’t anything special. Same goes for the Other Semites, the Arabs who have personalities not unlike those of Jews. But those cousin-humping camel-piss-drinkers aren’t all that bright either.
With Jews, it’s the combination of pushy personality and high IQ. Joe Pesci does real damage throughout GOODFELLAS and CASINO, but thuggery is limited in range and scope.
Another thing about Jews is they are more passive-aggressive whereas Greeks and Southern Italians are more aggressive-aggressive, thus less effective in being devious. When Greeks lose it, they really lose it. It’s tantrum hour, Greek drama and tragedy. Jews can get wild and passionate, but they are more adept at juggling hot and cold. As merchants and wheeler-dealers, they developed chameleonic personalities. They had to be more like octopus or squid that can shape-shift and change colors. Very Zeligish. Jews always hold reserves of emotions than pouring them all out. An angry Greek will just throw a tantrum and burn up in fury. An angry Irish will growl and try to knock you out. A Jew may get angry, but there’s a huff-n-puff thing going where you aren’t sure how much of it is fire and how much of it is smoke.
So, Jews have personalities that are driven and pushy… but also fluid and deceptive. And they have higher IQ, more talent, and greater ability for cunning. Now, if the world were filled with non-Jews with similar traits and abilities, Jews wouldn’t have amounted to much. But as it happens, non-Jewish personalities tend to be more one-dimensional, obvious, and/or straight & square, and that means they often fall prey to more devious and cunning Jews.
Sure, Negroes got that jive-thing going, and PC blinds people to the Way of the Negro, but any honest person can soon enough learn to see the bull-jive for what it be. With Jews, it’s far trickier.
Anyway, because Jewish personality and ability evolved octopus-like to survive, adapt, and gain an advantage in a Sea of Goyim, Jews naturally developed a kind of contempt for non-Jews. The Jewish way is to hoodwink and fool others, and it just so happens that the hoodwinker will always look down on the hoodwinked. (Also, if non-Jews see the world in terms of the Powerful over the Weak — the Weak must bow down before the Powerful — , Jews believe that they should and could prevail even against the Powerful by whatever means necessary. Most peoples, as Davids, would have knelt before the bigger Goliath. But the Jewish David found a clever way to prevail over Goliath. When most immigrant groups came to America, they were awed by Anglos and wanted to serve the Great Anglo Power. But Jews thought otherwise. From the very beginning, they were looking for ways to take over America and prevail over the very people who’d founded and built the nation.) Jewish tradition of CULTURAL chauvinism and exceptionalism may have contributed to the current chutzpah, but it’s not the crucial factor. Suppose Jews have milder personalities and mediocre intelligence. Then, Jews would soon realize that their cultural chauvinism is just a lot of hooey. It’s like Chinese have long thought of themselves as the superior people of the Middle Kingdom and felt contempt for other peoples. And Japanese were into the conceit of belonging to some sacred Yamato race. But as minorities in the West, they realize they aren’t anything special. They got dull personalities, and their IQ’s are on par with whites. As diligent drones, they study and get admitted to nicer schools, but they don’t feel special because they really aren’t when compared with most whites.
But even secular Jews who never read the Torah and Talmud often feel contempt for goyim. Smart people tend to be impatient or eye-rolling around dupes and dummies. (Dummies are just dumb, whereas dupes could be smart people who’ve been ideologically, emotionally, or psychologically tricked into believing horseshi*... like the Lindsay Crouse character in THE HOUSE OF GAMES, an intelligent woman who is tricked by a bunch of con-men hustlers. Dupes, like dummies, draw only contempt from people who are either smarter or savvier.)
Most non-Jews seem pretty dumb, naive, or gullible to Jews.
Now, a nice smart person can feel compassion than contempt for the dumb and have no design to dupe others. But being trusting and kindly is difficult for many Jews due to their passive-aggressive haggly-waggly merchant personalities. Jews evolved to survive in a world of many larger tribes who could even be hostile and dangerous. So, Jews had to seek out angles to squeeze through cracks and crevices of power. They had to be like Houdini. And this personality type made Jews tireless and restless in their penchant to score another one, then another and another and another. If some people are degenerate gamblers, Jews are like degenerate scorers. They just gotta score another round. It’s like the personalities in David Mamet movies. Never trusting anyone and always using one’s wits and antennae to stay ahead of the game to score some more. If some Jews are neurotically offensive in scoring more and more — such Jews have gangster mentalities — , other Jews are neurotically defensive(and paranoid) in protecting their treasures or nest-egg from Others, the gangster Jews and pitchfork goyim(who may be out to loot the properties of smarter Jews). Take Mamet’s SPANISH PRISONER. If HOUSE OF GAMES is about clever ‘gangster Jewish’ types looking to make another score, SPANISH PRISONER is about a smart ‘genius Jewish’ type aiming to guard what is rightfully his from a world of sharks. We don’t know where intuition ends and insinuation begins.
Because of this personality + ability, many Jews just can’t help themselves. Taking advantage of dumb, naive, or craven goyim is to those Jews what hunting for wildebeest is for lions and hyenas. It’s like crack to a Negro or meth to a hillbilly. They gotta have it. This aspect of Jewishness was colorfully illustrated in THE WOLF OF WALL STREET. Sure, the real Jordan Belfort tried to rationalize his financial hijinks as revenge against Wasps who’d kept his grampy out of some golf club. But, EVERY GROUP has resentments. Mexicans probably have lots of resentment about how they generally serve as helots to gringos and Jews. But where are the Mexican Belforts? Guillermos of the world are too mild in personality and too low in ability. The most they can do is get together for tacos and tequila and tell lame jokes about gringos and Jewez.
But someone with Belfort's drive, personality, and ability could go very far. And Belfort didn’t just use drugs to feel good. He got HIGH from cheating people. He just couldn’t stop swindling people. It was better than sex. It was better than drugs. Besides, more money meant more sex and more drugs.
Now, some Jews are troubled by all this. David Brooks, in his esoteric way, urges Jews to act more like model ruling elites. Learn from the best of the Old Wasp way. The Dean Witter way.
But at this point, collective Jewish morality may be hopeless. It’s like with the Negroes and Homos. There was once a time when some sober Negroes like Booker T. Washington not only pleaded with whites to be fairer with Negroes but pleaded with Negroes to be a credit to their race and value work ethic and lead proper lives. But such dreams are impossible today. With rap culture all over, with mandingo-sports-stud as the icon of the ‘west’, and with Magic Negro cult(that sacralizes Negroes to a holy race), Negroes just can’t help themselves and are into self-worship, hollering, walloping, and crazy behavior. BLM is used as excuse to throw tantrums, shoot cops, riot and loot.
As for homos, forget about doing their own thing in their own space and keeping it discreet. ‘Gay liberation’ means homos can do whatever they please, and any criticism is derided and denounced as ‘homophobic’. Homos are now addicted to excessive vanity and self-celebration. Indeed, Milo the ‘gay conservative’ defends liberty mainly because he wants no barriers to his deranged revelry in everything ‘dangerous’. And women are into slut culture and believe they deserve both the right to act like sluts and the respect of ladies. They want the cake and eat it too. Negroes wanna burn down cities but also be seen as saints. Homos wanna bugger every bung but be seen as ‘new normal’ and respectable. Feminist women wanna act like whores but also seen as victims of ‘misogyny’.
And Jews don’t want any restraint in their hunger for wealth, influence, and domination. They revel in Zionist-globalist nihilism. They are addicted to power and can’t stop. Jews sitting before Power & Money is like a Negro sitting at a table filled with watermelons, buckets of chicken, and entire case of Colt 45. Or, it’s like a lesbian with bed full of dildos and vibrators and cucumbers. It’s like a hillbilly with a big batch of moonshine and meth to drink and smoke all night long. Jewish drive, personality, and ability all ‘conspire’ to make Jews excessive in their behavior once it goes out-of-control. Today, even Moral Hazard is dustbin of history because Jews control most elite institutions. So, if Wall Street goes bust, there are Jews in the FED and government to bail out Wall Street Jews. If Neocon warmongers mess up, Jews in the media push most of the blame on goyim like Bush, Cheney, Hillary, or Obama. Jews remain untouchable. Notice how Jews act as a tag-team against Trump. The combination of Deep State, Ivy League, Big Media, Hollywood, Wall Street, and Think Tanks all work together and close in on him.
Even though Bernie Madoff finally got caught, why had he been able to run such a scheme for so long? Surely, many experienced Jews knew something fishy was up. Madoff could be Madoff because he was a Made Guy(like certain members of the crew among the Mafia who have the "license to steal, license to do anything"); he was one of the Tribe, and he was making other Jews very rich. He had connections. And even when he was finally brought down, there was the Jewish-controlled Media to shield the Jewish community that had made Bernie Madoff possible. The media spun it as "Madoff stole mostly from Jews" and "it’s antisemitic to see his behavior as part of a Jewish pattern." Media failed to mention that before Madoff sunk Jewish fortunes, he had fleeced tons of goyim to pass their wealth over to Jews. And the ‘antisemitism’ taboo has indoctrinated and conditioned generations of Americans not to notice certain patterns that keep recurring among Jews.
It’s like David Schraub made the utterly bogus argument that the Zionist kid who’d faked bomb threats is really an ‘anti-Semite’. This from a legal scholar at an elite college! Never mind that the Jewish kid defamed white Christian gentiles for the ‘hate hoaxes’ he himself committed. Never mind he did it to serve Jewish interests. Schraub conveniently blamed it all on ‘antisemitism’. So, ‘antisemitism’ is not only when gentiles defame Jews but also when Jews defame gentiles to serve Jewish interests. Jews are ALWAYS the victim.
But then, according to Jewish logic, the Antifa scum who initiated the attack on the Alt Right at Charlottesville after the Jewish mayor violated constitutional rights were just ‘protesters’ whereas white patriots who defended themselves were ‘violent extremists’.
Part of the problem is Jewish wheeler-dealer personality. Jews get high from spinning things via propaganda, advertising, and finance to increase wealth and power. It’s like Matthew Weiner of the TV series MAD MEN making a big stink about ‘white privilege’ while pretending Jews got none. Hoodwinking others is part of the Jewish DNA that evolved in competition not only to survive but to gain mastery to smite all others.
But, it’s also due to panic and fear. After all, Jews are only 2% of the population, and who knows what might happen if the taboos against ‘antisemitism’ were finally lifted.
Paradoxically, Jews are more paranoid about ‘antisemitism’ precisely because so many Jews are now acting in ways that almost validate antisemitic stereotypes.
It’s like what Yossi Sarid said: In These Very Moments, The Protocols Are Being Rewritten.
The Protocols of Elders of Zion is a forgery BUT so much of bad Jewish behavior is just giving ammo to old antisemitic stereotypes. Given this development, wouldn’t it make sense for Jews to sober up and act more responsibly? Sure. But the problem is Jews have an extreme personality that, once allowed to run free, can’t stop running. Same goes for Negroes. The black genie cannot be put back in the bottle. Negroes are naturally savage and love to swing their dongs and pump their booties and holler like Aretha Franklin and wallop like Mike Tyson. They be wild. So, there is no way to stop black lunacy. With blacks acting crazy, there is bound to be more anti-black feelings.. and this is why blacks must double-down on PC and ‘white guilt’ to ensure that whites will continue forgiving blacks and offering more freebies.
Likewise, Jewish egomania is totally out of control. We see it in Wall Street, Las Vegas, Hollywood, Pornography and the Pornification of culture at large(even for kid shows), support of homomania as new religion, in foreign policy with likes of hideous Victoria Nuland messing up Ukraine, and etc. If not for internet sleuths, the loutish Sabrina Rubin Erderly would have gotten away with her appalling piece of defamation against Southern white men in Rolling Stone Magazine run by homo Jew Jann Wenner. Is it any wonder that there is an alliance of extreme personalities? Jews, Homos, and Negroes? And to some extent, the People of Dot as some Hindus got the IQ of Jews but the moral character of Gypsies.
At this point, Jews are loathe to admit something is wrong with their community even though they know full well that something has gone terribly wrong. So much is rotten that they fear that the slightest admittance will lead to more holes that may break the dam. When power grows rotten and fills up with gas, everyone dreads to pierce it as its foulness will explode all over(like with a beached whale). (But maybe the fall of Harvey Weinstein and others is a sign that things are really beginning to change.)
