Jewish-Power-grown-cancerous is Destroying the World, but the Great Jew Taboo not only prohibits us from noticing the Cancer but insists We must see the Jewish Supremacist Cancer as a GOOD THING

There are so many dire problems facing the world, but the nature of their origins and trajectories go misunderstood because of the Great Jew Taboo. While not everything has to do with Jewish Power, the fact remains that whatever the US does has ripple effect on the rest of the world. US is at the center. And the Power that gets to throw stones into the center of the Pool is the Empire of Judea. People in the Dissident Right know it and say so. People in the Dissident Left know but would rather not say so. Too many are Jewish or fear the charge of 'antisemitism'. Still, a growing number of people on the Dissident Left are at least voicing opposition to Zionist overreach in West Bank and the Middle East(via Neocon foreign policies).

As for Establishment Conzos and Libby-dibs -- these cartoon characters don't even deserve to be called by the proper labels of 'conservatives' or 'liberals' -- , some of them MUST know what is really happening and why, but they remain silent about Jewish power out of cynical careerism or slavish cuckism(as some people just love to worship and put out to the ultimate power like groupies to Rock stars and athletes).
It used to be Jewish Power had its good side and bad side. But when a Power goes un-criticized, the bad side almost invariably overshadows the good side. The nature of power is to want more. It's like nature of hunger is to eat more and more, leading to gluttony or over-eating beyond what is necessary and healthy. The nature of sex is to want more action, leading to lust and 'sluttony'. The nature of self-interest is to become greedy as people want to have more and more. So, unless the natural drive isn't countered by other drives, a sense of balance is lost. The excessive gains over the moderate.
Generally, if there is balance in the world, it's not because it is favored and enforced as an ideal. It is because it is met with counter-force and is thus unable to realize its most excessive ambitions. After the end of the Cold War, the US didn't opt for balance of powers but strove to rule the world(mostly in service of narrow tribal agendas as Jews became the overlords of America). So, whatever world balance that had existed during the Cold War wasn't due to the ideal of compromise but because the two superpowers were in a stalemate. It's like Alexander the Great wanted to conquer all the world. He stopped only because his army just couldn't go on anymore. More often that not, the prevailing balance, if such exists, is not the hallowed ideal but the result of compromise among various forces, none of which has been able to gain decisive supremacy. The reason why rabbits and deer don't eat up all the forest and vegetation is not because they have an idealized appreciation of balance. They will go about multiplying and feeding to the fullest capacity. The natural balance is the result of predators keeping down the number of rabbits and deers. The natural balance isn't achieved by internal will among organisms. All organisms seek to multiply, spread, and feed as much as possible. Total dominance of one organism is prevented by external counter-violence of other organisms.
Granted, human organisms do have self-awareness and CAN rely on internal will to favor balance over excess. A man knows overeating leads to obesity and can control his appetite. And many people do regulate their drives. But then, many people don't. And people who tend to be ambitious almost never know when to stop. They want to conquer and gain everything regardless of the consequences upon rest of humanity. 'Enough' is not in their vocabulary. Look at Amazon.com. It won't stop growing because nothing stands in its maniacal drive to swallow all of retail. Same with Google. It wants to acquire more and more and control everything. Ideally, various companies should compete in all sectors. But it seems like Amazon is trying to swallow all of retail(and much else). And Google not only monopolizes the search engine and online video but is moving to take over other industries. And, payment monopoly in the online world means that one or two companies get to decide who gets to earn/spend money and who can't.
This is why the government exists to control monopolies because, by their very nature, monopolies are out-of-control leviathans. They became monopolies by swallowing up all competitors, and they won't ever stop in trying to grab more and more of everything. But the current government does almost nothing about monopolies because there is such a comfy tribal, socio-cultural, and/or ideological amity between Big Industry and the Deep State. They all went to the same schools and scratch each other's back. Also, in our post-religious age, they all share in the worship of the same neo-idols, such as MLK and Mandela, and the Holy Three(of Jews, Negroes, and Homos, the three sacred groups). Thus, they even feel sanctimonious about their piggish monopolization of power, privilege, and influence. They deserve it, of course, because they worship the Holy Homo and dole out lavish sums for 'gay pride' parades. And there is, of course, a Jewish ethnic element in this collusion. After all, many of the biggest players in high-tech, gambling, media/entertainment, pharma, finance, law firms & courts, elite academia, and the Deep State are Jews. One might think that Jews would feel that they got more than enough as the 2% that owns something close to 50% of the wealth in the US. But no, they are like the Max character in ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA. They must have more and more. The world is ruled by gangsters.



In the past, such Jewish ambitions would have been pushed back and checked by various counter-forces in politics, the economy, the church, and various institutions. Jewish force was met with counter-force, and this required Jews to be somewhat mindful and try to put forth a positive image of themselves. There was some pressure on Jews to favor the good Jews or nobler Jews over the worst kinds of Jews. The worst Jews always existed, just like scum exists among all groups. But because of the pressures of 'antisemitism', the good Jews felt they had to do something to restrain some of the worst elements of their kind. After all, if bad Jews got out of control, then even good goyim will unleash the bad goyim to go after the Jews, in the melee hurting good Jews along with bad Jews. So, the bad Jews were always there but usually on a leash. But ever since Shoah became the quasi-religion of the West, Jews became the Holy Holocaust people, and just about any criticism of Jewish behavior, no matter how despicable, came to be regarded as 'rabid' and 'virulent'. So, the traditional goy critics of bad Jewish behavior either clammed up or were shut down. Still, there was the chance that good Jews could go on clamping down on the bad Jews, but as bad Jews cooked up ever more schemes to rake in tons of money for the Jewish community and advantage Zionism over its rivals -- through gambling, pornography, drugs, financial theft, media propaganda, warmongering, and etc -- , even good Jews became less and less critical of bad Jews. Bad Jews may be bad, but they sure know how to get things done and fast too. Before his downfall, Bernie Madoff made some serious money for his Jewish clientele; the good Jews couldn't get enough from bad Jew Madoff. Bad Jews among the Neocons and Liberal Zionists got the US to destroy entire nations perceived to be rivals of Israel. And Jewish control of gambling sent billions and billions into Jewish coffers. And the Sackler family sure made a killing with opioids. And monopoly capitalism allowed Jews to take over entire sectors of the internet via the close cooperation between Jewish-dominated finance and Jewish entrepreneurs. While guys like Mark Zuckerberg and Sergey Brin are obviously super-smart, they wouldn't have so easily attracted financial backing if they weren't Jewish. We know that people with wrong identity or ideology are willfully targeted by the System for exclusion. And so, over time, bad Jews grew out of control and pretty much came to define the essence of Jewish Power as it went about spreading more wars, degeneracy, addiction, lies and propaganda, invasion of the West by the Third World, and etc. The mass media that pushes Russia Collusion nonsense for over 2 yrs is truly chutzpah on steroids. In other words, Jewish power got cancerous. But it's actually worse because the prevailing PC tells us that we must admire, praise, and defend this Jewish GLOBlastoma as healthiest and holiest wonder in the world. Imagine that, the very power that is most responsible for the world's biggest crises is supposed to be most prized and protected. And yet, people can't help but notice its ill-effects in every corner of the world. People do notice the symptoms and report on them. The problem is they can never associate all those signs of sickness with the main source, the Jewish globo-homo cancer in America, the center of the world that takes orders from the cancerous worldwide network of the Empire of Judea. So, most people in media and academia just blame Russia, Iran, Assad, Putin, China, North Korea, Palestinians, 'white supremacists', populism, the 'far right', 'xenophobia', and etc. when, if anything, the aforementioned are, more often than not, victims of or reactors to Jewish supremacist moves toward hegemony. It's probably the case that Jews in media/academia peddle BS to protect the Tribe, but what about goyim? Are they hapless tools or eager dupes of Jewish Power? Either way, they are a pathetic lot.

Imagine a world where people are told by doctors that there is nothing more healthy and wonderful than cancer. Indeed, the official message says all people should aspire to get cancer, and once they get it, they must make sure it spreads faster because having cancer makes you healthier. Cancer has healing powers, almost like a miracle. So, never entertain negative thoughts about cancer. It is good, and you better believe it or else you are soul-sick anti-cancerite.
But what happens as the cancer spreads? It obviously leads to a host of health issues that get worse by the day. So, you notice the worsening condition and go to the doctor. He agrees that those are illnesses and something must be done. He offers you all sorts of drugs and treatments, BUT he never says that your ailments have anything to do with cancer. If anything, he tells you that you should feel so lucky to have cancer because, without it, you'd be sicker than you already are. So, the main reason you have a good chance of recovery is because you have miraculous cancer inside of you that does everything to keep you healthy and fight off disease.
Of course, it is the Cancer that is really causing the other illnesses. Cancer is the source of the other problems. And it is total quackery to say that cancer is wonderful and has NOTHING to do with the sickness. One thing for sure, if the quackery continues and if the doctor and the patient carry on with the charade that the cancer is the cure than the cause of the worsening condition, the patient is doomed. Quackery always kills.

Now, anything can become cancerous. Germans grew cancerous with Nazism, which overwhelmed what was good about Germany and made all of Germany serve a great evil, leading to WWII and deaths of tens of millions. And today, it appears the bad Jews have gained over the good Jews, and the Jewish cancer is spreading rapidly all over. But most people say nothing because PC has instilled them with irrational quasi-spiritual feelings about Jews(ALL Jews) as Holy Holocaust people, the implication being that noticing anything bad about Jews is a form of soul-disease called 'antisemitism'.
In fact, both Antisemitism and Philosemitism can become out-of-control cancerous. Nazism was antisemitism gone cancerous. It went way beyond calling out on bad Jews. Its ideological quackery said that even good Jews are bad Jews and that the pathological Hitler-Himmler Cancer is the best cure for Germany and all the world. While radical cancerous Antisemitism can do great harm, so can cancerous Philosemitism. Now, excessive Philosemitism wouldn't matter if Jews were a dumb, weak, and powerless people. I mean, what harm could come to the world if all of humanity were to excessively fawn over Eskimos, Tibetans, or fat native Hawaiians? Unlike those insignificant folks, Jews are a great people(like the Germans once were) and capable of much good and much evil. And because of their greatness, when they go bad, they can blanket the entire world with tremendous evil. It's like, when a massive volcano blows up, its ashes and toxins affect vast expanses of land and sea. Jewish Power has grown monstrous and cancerous, but PC Narrative tells us to forever see Jews as a bunch of Anne Franks and emaciated survivors straggling out of Death Camps at the end of WWII. The effect is the Jewish cancer only gets more out-of-control as the logic of cancer is to spread faster and further. The more we carry on with the philosemitic charade, the cancer will accelerate. And then, it will finally reach a stage when it will destroy humanity and the world because cancer always ultimately kills. Or, if people finally and properly diagnose the cancer as a disease when it's too late, their anger may be such that their solution might be something like radical surgery and heavy-duty chemo & radiation treatment, in which case Jews and goyim will suffer greatly, even if they survive.

We must call a cancer a cancer. This doesn't mean that Jews or Jewishness per se are cancers. Any people, any ideology, or any movement can become cancerous, whereupon the 'bad cells' are no longer contained by the 'good cells' and just spread and run wild, overtaking the 'good cells' that become helpless to stop the rampage of the 'bad cells'. In the end, even the 'good cells' just come to support a sick system that has effectively been overtaken by the 'bad cells'. Current Jewish Power is obviously one where the Bad Jews have taken control over the farm. Sure, there are Good Jews like Stephen Cohen and Oliver Stone who call out on the madness of the current Jewish-driven anti-Russian policy, but two swallows don't make a summer.



It is bad enough to ignore cancer, but it's far worse to elevate cancer to the status of good health. Bad Jews stole the mantle of Shoah and put on Anne Frank masks to carry out one heist after another against the wealth and health of nations. The US media was never trustworthy, but today's mainstream news are more surreal than Soviet propaganda during the Cold War. And the current hysteria about Russia makes people like Joe McCarthy seem downright sober. At the very least, Soviet Espionage in the 40s and 50s was a fact. Signs of Jewish perfidy were evident all throughout the Cold War. After all, one of the great canards of the Cold War era was that anti-communism or 'Red Scare' was mostly unfounded hysteria and paranoia about noble 'progressives' as champions of civil liberties and freedom. In fact, the leftists of the 40s and 50s were apologists of Stalinism, supported the Iron Curtain, and were ruthless in silencing renegades in their own circle. They invoked 'free speech' and 'constitutional rights' only because they got caught red-handed as either spies or members of the Communist Party. The fact that such a big lie was pushed on the public during the Cold War indicates that there was a cancer growing in the Jewish community long before Jews gained dominant power in the US. Still, prior to the 1990s, there were still enough counter-forces(even among Jews) that prevented the worst elements of Jewish Power from getting totally out of control. But since the 1990s, Jewish power in finance, gambling, high-tech, big pharma, law firms, and etc PLUS the Holy Holocaust Cult made it possible for Jews to do as they pleased(even to excess) while being seen by the world as the saintly hapless innocents in SCHINDLER'S LIST. The very people who were swallowing up the world came to be fawned upon as the weakest of the weak. Even as Jews were building new casinos and banks(and looting the economy of Russia), they were also erecting the Holocaust Museum in the Mall and filling billions of minds around the world with the new genre of the Holocaust Movie. The Holocaust became an effective hologramic moral shield for Jewish Power as it penetrated into every corner of the globe for opportunities to plunder nations and peoples.

While it'd be wrong to say Jews = cancer, we need to call it like it is when the power of a particular group grows cancerous. And it is all the more important when that group happens to be powerful. And it is deadly important when that group happens to be the MOST powerful and holds the world in its palms. Jewish Power has grown cancerous. New York Times, the premier mouthpiece of Jewish globalist supremacist power, puts forth a sack of shit like Thomas Friedman as some wise worldly sage. If anything, Friedman is a tribal-supremacist who even supports ISIS tearing Syria apart as long as it serves Israel. He is a total cretin hiding behind highfalutin talk. So, even as we can agree that no particular people = cancer, we can acknowledge that any people/power can grow cancerous... just like any individual can go from health to cancer. An individual grows cancerous when the bad cells gain over the good cells. And a people/power grow cancerous when the good(or at least better or saner) members can no longer hold back the radical and/or criminal impulses of the bad(or worse or crazier) members. Good Jews made a fatal mistake when, push come to shove, they stuck with Bad Jews than with Good Goyim. Even as Jews urged upon Good Goyim to reject Bad Goyim, they prioritized the union of all Jews, even evil and crazy ones. Notice how most Jews got together to get Jonathan Pollard sprung from prison even though his betrayal led to the deaths of hundreds of people. Just like it makes no sense to speak of good cells and bad cells in a person in whom cancer has taken over -- existing good cells have become powerless to stop the spread of bad cells --, it is becoming meaningless to speak of Good Jews and Bad Jews because both are now so joined at the hip. After all, if the Good works with the Bad, the Good also becomes the Bad by enabling the Bad. A cop who works with crooks becomes a crook himself despite his badge as officer of the law. Granted, there are a few hopeful signs that some Jews are trying to restore some measure of goodness. The NBC journalist who resigned in protest is one such Jew, Willam Arkin.

‘Phobia’ is one of the Most Misunderstood and Misused Terms — Jews, Power, and Personality — Why Jews just Can’t Stop their out-of-control Madness

Eric Schneiderman, yet another vampiric Jew with Excessive Personality

Some people suggest that Antisemitism should be called ‘Judeophobia’, but it’d be wrong and misconceived, just like what goes by the name of ‘Russophobia’. (The current lunacy about Russia is hype and hysteria, not a phobia. Big difference.)

In the strictest sense, phobia is a medical condition. It isn’t a common case of mere dislike or fear. It is an extreme, irrational, and panicked fear of something harmless. The term should not be abused for political or ideological purposes. Its meaning should remain within the range of clinical psychology and psycho-social behavior. When you say someone is ‘phobic’ in the political context, you aren’t merely suggesting that he is anti-something. You are saying his antipathy is a mental disorder. Indeed, it is worse than a slur. A slur suggests someone is a bad person or an a**hole. In contrast, labeling someone with a phobia is to diagnose him as mentally ill or soul-sick. We know Jews in WWII hated and feared Nazis; so, does that mean Jews-in-hiding were Nazi-phobic? Of course not. They had sane and sound reasons for evading Nazis. Likewise, it is why the term ‘homophobia’ is totally bogus. Finding homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting is NOT phobic. It’s natural and normal.

So, what is a phobia? THIS is a phobia:



And even though Charles Grodin fakes it in MIDNIGHT RUN, extreme fear-of-flying is also a genuine phobia:



This is why ‘phobia’ has been effective as a political smear. It not only says your enemy is wrong in policy or position but sick in the head, heart, and soul. Cuckoo.

Critics of Jews, for the most part, are not ‘Judeophobes’. They are Judeo-Critics or Judeo-Skeptics. Furthermore, most people who are smeared as ‘Anti-Semites’ are more like Anxi-Semites, or people who are ANXIOUS about Jewish-Semitic Power.
Now, there are Judeo-Psychotics, the kind of people who are obsessed with Hitler-as-hero or Shoah-as-charade. The Nazi movement certainly had lots of Judeo-Psychotics, though, to be sure, their radicalism was an extreme reaction to Jewish pathologies that exploded with Bolshevism and Weimar decadence.

Most critics of Jews are not Shoah-desecrators. They are Shoah-atheists, which is to say they take a secular historical approach to the event. After all, the Shoah has been turned into a quasi-religion that cannot be discussed rationally and empirically. It must be ‘believed’ than studied. Indeed, there’s no shortage of Shoah-worshipers who insist that the 6 million number is sacrosanct and must never be ‘denied’. We are to adhere to ADL’s sacro-narrative just like good Catholics are supposed to obey and follow the positions of the Vatican.

Also, in regards to our problems with Jews, it has little to do with ancient traditions or beliefs. After all, would people care about Jewish culture or credo if Jews were without power and influence? We learn about the Jewish past to look for clues about Jewish Power in the present. If Jews today were a powerless people, we would be far less interested in their history, culture, and attitude(especially toward non-Jews).
Mongols were once a fearsome people who regarded the rest of humanity as LOOT to pillage and plunder. Today, Mongols still revere Genghis Khan, which suggests they aren’t the most sensitive or conscientious people when it comes to historical memory. But who cares? Mongols got no power except in wrestling in open fields among yaks and using eagles to hunt wolves. Modern Mongols pose no threat to Russia and China and Iran. So, even if Mongols may be unrepentant and still dream of the ‘good ole days’ of Genghis, it’s neither here nor there. If anything, most people would find it rather amusing, even endearing. Two million Mongols dreaming of taking over China or Russia on horseback. LOL.

Same logic applies to any people, including Jews. Suppose present Jews have an IQ average of 90. Suppose they got little power or wealth. Suppose they have the mild personality of Amish. Would it matter what they think? Suppose these Jews believe that it’d be wonderful to conquer all goyim, kill goy kids, and suck out their blood. Suppose their ideology is utterly diabolical. Should it alarm anyone? No, it wouldn’t matter because Jews wouldn’t have the power to make a difference in the world. It’s like American Indians were once frightening blood-thirsty childish savages who reveled in hacking skulls with tomahawks and whooping like wolves. But they got no power in our world. They just drink, watch Negroes on TV, and collect some cash from the local casino to buy some more booze. So, it doesn’t matter what Indians think. Their power doesn’t amount to a plate of beans.

In contrast, what Jews think does matter because of Jewish ability, intelligence, personality, and drive. Jews got chutzpah. Alan Dershowitz, an especially chutzpastic Jew, wrote a book by that title. Fun reading.

The matter of personality is crucial in understanding the Jewish Problem. Granted, personality alone isn’t sufficient to explain it. Southern Italians, Gypsies, and esp Greeks can be pretty nasty, tenacious, and devious in personality too. Just look at Joe Pesci in GOODFELLAS and CASINO. And when it comes to throwing tantrums, Greek women take the cake. Even Negroes never scared me as much as an angry Greek woman.
But Greek IQ and Southern Italian IQ’s aren’t anything special. Same goes for the Other Semites, the Arabs who have personalities not unlike those of Jews. But those cousin-humping camel-piss-drinkers aren’t all that bright either.

With Jews, it’s the combination of pushy personality and high IQ. Joe Pesci does real damage throughout GOODFELLAS and CASINO, but thuggery is limited in range and scope.

Another thing about Jews is they are more passive-aggressive whereas Greeks and Southern Italians are more aggressive-aggressive, thus less effective in being devious. When Greeks lose it, they really lose it. It’s tantrum hour, Greek drama and tragedy. Jews can get wild and passionate, but they are more adept at juggling hot and cold. As merchants and wheeler-dealers, they developed chameleonic personalities. They had to be more like octopus or squid that can shape-shift and change colors. Very Zeligish. Jews always hold reserves of emotions than pouring them all out. An angry Greek will just throw a tantrum and burn up in fury. An angry Irish will growl and try to knock you out. A Jew may get angry, but there’s a huff-n-puff thing going where you aren’t sure how much of it is fire and how much of it is smoke.


So, Jews have personalities that are driven and pushy… but also fluid and deceptive. And they have higher IQ, more talent, and greater ability for cunning. Now, if the world were filled with non-Jews with similar traits and abilities, Jews wouldn’t have amounted to much. But as it happens, non-Jewish personalities tend to be more one-dimensional, obvious, and/or straight & square, and that means they often fall prey to more devious and cunning Jews.
Sure, Negroes got that jive-thing going, and PC blinds people to the Way of the Negro, but any honest person can soon enough learn to see the bull-jive for what it be. With Jews, it’s far trickier.

Anyway, because Jewish personality and ability evolved octopus-like to survive, adapt, and gain an advantage in a Sea of Goyim, Jews naturally developed a kind of contempt for non-Jews. The Jewish way is to hoodwink and fool others, and it just so happens that the hoodwinker will always look down on the hoodwinked. (Also, if non-Jews see the world in terms of the Powerful over the Weak — the Weak must bow down before the Powerful — , Jews believe that they should and could prevail even against the Powerful by whatever means necessary. Most peoples, as Davids, would have knelt before the bigger Goliath. But the Jewish David found a clever way to prevail over Goliath. When most immigrant groups came to America, they were awed by Anglos and wanted to serve the Great Anglo Power. But Jews thought otherwise. From the very beginning, they were looking for ways to take over America and prevail over the very people who’d founded and built the nation.) Jewish tradition of CULTURAL chauvinism and exceptionalism may have contributed to the current chutzpah, but it’s not the crucial factor. Suppose Jews have milder personalities and mediocre intelligence. Then, Jews would soon realize that their cultural chauvinism is just a lot of hooey. It’s like Chinese have long thought of themselves as the superior people of the Middle Kingdom and felt contempt for other peoples. And Japanese were into the conceit of belonging to some sacred Yamato race. But as minorities in the West, they realize they aren’t anything special. They got dull personalities, and their IQ’s are on par with whites. As diligent drones, they study and get admitted to nicer schools, but they don’t feel special because they really aren’t when compared with most whites.

But even secular Jews who never read the Torah and Talmud often feel contempt for goyim. Smart people tend to be impatient or eye-rolling around dupes and dummies. (Dummies are just dumb, whereas dupes could be smart people who’ve been ideologically, emotionally, or psychologically tricked into believing horseshi*... like the Lindsay Crouse character in THE HOUSE OF GAMES, an intelligent woman who is tricked by a bunch of con-men hustlers. Dupes, like dummies, draw only contempt from people who are either smarter or savvier.)
Most non-Jews seem pretty dumb, naive, or gullible to Jews.
Now, a nice smart person can feel compassion than contempt for the dumb and have no design to dupe others. But being trusting and kindly is difficult for many Jews due to their passive-aggressive haggly-waggly merchant personalities. Jews evolved to survive in a world of many larger tribes who could even be hostile and dangerous. So, Jews had to seek out angles to squeeze through cracks and crevices of power. They had to be like Houdini. And this personality type made Jews tireless and restless in their penchant to score another one, then another and another and another. If some people are degenerate gamblers, Jews are like degenerate scorers. They just gotta score another round. It’s like the personalities in David Mamet movies. Never trusting anyone and always using one’s wits and antennae to stay ahead of the game to score some more. If some Jews are neurotically offensive in scoring more and more — such Jews have gangster mentalities — , other Jews are neurotically defensive(and paranoid) in protecting their treasures or nest-egg from Others, the gangster Jews and pitchfork goyim(who may be out to loot the properties of smarter Jews). Take Mamet’s SPANISH PRISONER. If HOUSE OF GAMES is about clever ‘gangster Jewish’ types looking to make another score, SPANISH PRISONER is about a smart ‘genius Jewish’ type aiming to guard what is rightfully his from a world of sharks. We don’t know where intuition ends and insinuation begins.


Because of this personality + ability, many Jews just can’t help themselves. Taking advantage of dumb, naive, or craven goyim is to those Jews what hunting for wildebeest is for lions and hyenas. It’s like crack to a Negro or meth to a hillbilly. They gotta have it. This aspect of Jewishness was colorfully illustrated in THE WOLF OF WALL STREET. Sure, the real Jordan Belfort tried to rationalize his financial hijinks as revenge against Wasps who’d kept his grampy out of some golf club. But, EVERY GROUP has resentments. Mexicans probably have lots of resentment about how they generally serve as helots to gringos and Jews. But where are the Mexican Belforts? Guillermos of the world are too mild in personality and too low in ability. The most they can do is get together for tacos and tequila and tell lame jokes about gringos and Jewez.

But someone with Belfort's drive, personality, and ability could go very far. And Belfort didn’t just use drugs to feel good. He got HIGH from cheating people. He just couldn’t stop swindling people. It was better than sex. It was better than drugs. Besides, more money meant more sex and more drugs.


Now, some Jews are troubled by all this. David Brooks, in his esoteric way, urges Jews to act more like model ruling elites. Learn from the best of the Old Wasp way. The Dean Witter way.


But at this point, collective Jewish morality may be hopeless. It’s like with the Negroes and Homos. There was once a time when some sober Negroes like Booker T. Washington not only pleaded with whites to be fairer with Negroes but pleaded with Negroes to be a credit to their race and value work ethic and lead proper lives. But such dreams are impossible today. With rap culture all over, with mandingo-sports-stud as the icon of the ‘west’, and with Magic Negro cult(that sacralizes Negroes to a holy race), Negroes just can’t help themselves and are into self-worship, hollering, walloping, and crazy behavior. BLM is used as excuse to throw tantrums, shoot cops, riot and loot.
As for homos, forget about doing their own thing in their own space and keeping it discreet. ‘Gay liberation’ means homos can do whatever they please, and any criticism is derided and denounced as ‘homophobic’. Homos are now addicted to excessive vanity and self-celebration. Indeed, Milo the ‘gay conservative’ defends liberty mainly because he wants no barriers to his deranged revelry in everything ‘dangerous’. And women are into slut culture and believe they deserve both the right to act like sluts and the respect of ladies. They want the cake and eat it too. Negroes wanna burn down cities but also be seen as saints. Homos wanna bugger every bung but be seen as ‘new normal’ and respectable. Feminist women wanna act like whores but also seen as victims of ‘misogyny’.

And Jews don’t want any restraint in their hunger for wealth, influence, and domination. They revel in Zionist-globalist nihilism. They are addicted to power and can’t stop. Jews sitting before Power & Money is like a Negro sitting at a table filled with watermelons, buckets of chicken, and entire case of Colt 45. Or, it’s like a lesbian with bed full of dildos and vibrators and cucumbers. It’s like a hillbilly with a big batch of moonshine and meth to drink and smoke all night long. Jewish drive, personality, and ability all ‘conspire’ to make Jews excessive in their behavior once it goes out-of-control. Today, even Moral Hazard is dustbin of history because Jews control most elite institutions. So, if Wall Street goes bust, there are Jews in the FED and government to bail out Wall Street Jews. If Neocon warmongers mess up, Jews in the media push most of the blame on goyim like Bush, Cheney, Hillary, or Obama. Jews remain untouchable. Notice how Jews act as a tag-team against Trump. The combination of Deep State, Ivy League, Big Media, Hollywood, Wall Street, and Think Tanks all work together and close in on him.

Even though Bernie Madoff finally got caught, why had he been able to run such a scheme for so long? Surely, many experienced Jews knew something fishy was up. Madoff could be Madoff because he was a Made Guy(like certain members of the crew among the Mafia who have the "license to steal, license to do anything"); he was one of the Tribe, and he was making other Jews very rich. He had connections. And even when he was finally brought down, there was the Jewish-controlled Media to shield the Jewish community that had made Bernie Madoff possible. The media spun it as "Madoff stole mostly from Jews" and "it’s antisemitic to see his behavior as part of a Jewish pattern." Media failed to mention that before Madoff sunk Jewish fortunes, he had fleeced tons of goyim to pass their wealth over to Jews. And the ‘antisemitism’ taboo has indoctrinated and conditioned generations of Americans not to notice certain patterns that keep recurring among Jews.
It’s like David Schraub made the utterly bogus argument that the Zionist kid who’d faked bomb threats is really an ‘anti-Semite’. This from a legal scholar at an elite college! Never mind that the Jewish kid defamed white Christian gentiles for the ‘hate hoaxes’ he himself committed. Never mind he did it to serve Jewish interests. Schraub conveniently blamed it all on ‘antisemitism’. So, ‘antisemitism’ is not only when gentiles defame Jews but also when Jews defame gentiles to serve Jewish interests. Jews are ALWAYS the victim.
But then, according to Jewish logic, the Antifa scum who initiated the attack on the Alt Right at Charlottesville after the Jewish mayor violated constitutional rights were just ‘protesters’ whereas white patriots who defended themselves were ‘violent extremists’.

Part of the problem is Jewish wheeler-dealer personality. Jews get high from spinning things via propaganda, advertising, and finance to increase wealth and power. It’s like Matthew Weiner of the TV series MAD MEN making a big stink about ‘white privilege’ while pretending Jews got none. Hoodwinking others is part of the Jewish DNA that evolved in competition not only to survive but to gain mastery to smite all others.
But, it’s also due to panic and fear. After all, Jews are only 2% of the population, and who knows what might happen if the taboos against ‘antisemitism’ were finally lifted.
Paradoxically, Jews are more paranoid about ‘antisemitism’ precisely because so many Jews are now acting in ways that almost validate antisemitic stereotypes.
It’s like what Yossi Sarid said: In These Very Moments, The Protocols Are Being Rewritten.

The Protocols of Elders of Zion is a forgery BUT so much of bad Jewish behavior is just giving ammo to old antisemitic stereotypes. Given this development, wouldn’t it make sense for Jews to sober up and act more responsibly? Sure. But the problem is Jews have an extreme personality that, once allowed to run free, can’t stop running. Same goes for Negroes. The black genie cannot be put back in the bottle. Negroes are naturally savage and love to swing their dongs and pump their booties and holler like Aretha Franklin and wallop like Mike Tyson. They be wild. So, there is no way to stop black lunacy. With blacks acting crazy, there is bound to be more anti-black feelings.. and this is why blacks must double-down on PC and ‘white guilt’ to ensure that whites will continue forgiving blacks and offering more freebies.

Likewise, Jewish egomania is totally out of control. We see it in Wall Street, Las Vegas, Hollywood, Pornography and the Pornification of culture at large(even for kid shows), support of homomania as new religion, in foreign policy with likes of hideous Victoria Nuland messing up Ukraine, and etc. If not for internet sleuths, the loutish Sabrina Rubin Erderly would have gotten away with her appalling piece of defamation against Southern white men in Rolling Stone Magazine run by homo Jew Jann Wenner. Is it any wonder that there is an alliance of extreme personalities? Jews, Homos, and Negroes? And to some extent, the People of Dot as some Hindus got the IQ of Jews but the moral character of Gypsies.

At this point, Jews are loathe to admit something is wrong with their community even though they know full well that something has gone terribly wrong. So much is rotten that they fear that the slightest admittance will lead to more holes that may break the dam. When power grows rotten and fills up with gas, everyone dreads to pierce it as its foulness will explode all over(like with a beached whale). (But maybe the fall of Harvey Weinstein and others is a sign that things are really beginning to change.)