For the Jews, championing Free Speech was always a tactic than a principle. They(and their goy minions) were for when it served their interests. But now that the power of Free Speech challenges, defies, and exposes their corruption, hypocrisy, abuses, and supremacism, much of courageous and honest free speech is defamed as 'hate speech' that must be shut down. Of course, the powerful globalists know full well that the hysteria about 'hate speech' is really a mind-control tactic to restrict the discourse, but bottom-feeding Antifa dummies(and druggies) are too stupid to realize they are being used and abused as justice-junkie goons and SJW attack dogs.
It seems as though Neo-Stalinism is coming off the rails in US colleges, at least some of them. Why? Unlike Stalin who had iron-grip and total control over his minions, Neo-Stalinist professors do not. The Chinese Cultural Revolution spiraled out of control, but even so, Mao had the ultimate authority to rein in the Red Guards when he decided enough was enough. So when things got out of order, he mobilized the military to restore order in the cities and sent the radical youths to the countryside(ostensibly to serve the people). In contrast, Neo-Stalinist or Neo-Maoist college professors can't control what they've unleashed. Their power is too weak(and their will too wussy) to act as a lid on the pressure cooker of nutball agendas.
Also, there is a lot of unspoken resentment among the nutball radicals on campuses. Even though they do not candidly articulate their feelings, the contradictions can be sensed. Our world has come to be about winners and losers. Globalism and mass immigration/diversity has made it increasingly difficult for the Grand Middle Class to define the Core of Americanism. It is now about the winner class and the loser class; naturally, there will be many more losers than winners. This being the case, the natural thing would be for radical leftists to challenge and attack the winner class that is hogging the wealth and prizes. And in an earlier time, this would have been the case when the upper classes were more conservative, 'reactionary', rightist, and Wasp. And anti-homo, anti-statist, and even 'antisemitic'. Back then, the upper classes were attacked by the Left as the bastion of right-wing white-supremacist privilege.
But such political attitudes have diminished with the rise of boomers. Especially with Jews taking elite power from Wasps, leftist politics came to be less focused on class and more on minority-identity. By such logic, the rich Jewish minority now has more victim points than poor white gentiles. 'Minority Rights' doesn't make a distinction between billionaire Jews or fancy neo-aristo homos AND ghetto blacks or lettuce-picking Mexicans.
Likewise, 'white privilege' doesn't distinguish between 'poor white trash' and someone like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett. If anything, precisely because rich whites can buy off the opposition by funding 'progressive' causes, they are less targeted with ideological animus than are the white working class or poor folks who tend to be more nationalist(as globalism been a bane for them).
With Jews as the new elites, attacking the rich is no longer ideologically kosher. Why, anti-wealth politics might be deemed as 'antisemitic'! Also, as the rich classes now fund Globo-Homomania and Diversinoma(Diversity-as-Cancer), they are praised as engines of 'progress' by the incestuous media and hype-machines controlled by people in the same club. So, nutball proglodytes go easy on George Soroses, Michael Bloombergs, Tim Cooks, and James Camerons of the world. Millennials are the Generation of Harvey Milk and Starbucks Coffee. Now that elite colleges are virtually entirely 'progressive' in an increasingly status-obsessed world(of 'winners and losers'), the future winners will be the main beneficiaries of PC-as-shield. According to the Official Dogma, how could they be 'bad people' when they are for 'gay marriage' and 'trannies in women-sports and the ladies room'? It is now easier than ever for the rich class to be 'leftist' or 'progressive' because the main organs of classic leftism have been removed and the void has been stuffed with issues amenable to manipulation by the rich. While the rich always had problems with demands of labor and class conflict, they need not concede much by pandering to the new themes of Zionism/Jew-worship, Globo-Homo, Magic Negro, and Diversity. As Jews are the richest people in America, being pro-Jewish now means being pro-wealth. As homos have neo-aristocratic flair and cater to the rich/powerful, they hardly pose a challenge to the privilege of the upper classes. The black issue can be dealt with by elevating token blacks like Oprah and Obama to the very top. Thus, even though most blacks remain mired in the same old problems, the symbolism of the 'first black president' and Oprah-as-billionaire-mammy(and MLK & Mandelas as new gods for the white race) creates the impression that the rich class is 'inclusive'. Even though they don't live close to most blacks, they rub shoulders with fancy blacks who are hyped by the media, thereby creating the impression that the upper class Jews & whites are totally 'anti-racist'. As long as they can afford fancy blacks to grace their parties and occasions, they can fend off the accusation of 'racism'. As for Diversity via More Immigration-Invasion, this is clearly in favor of the rich classes that can keep wages low; furthermore, their 'inclusion' of foreigners as new nationals is used as moral ammo against 'xenophobic' nationalist who come under the most competitive pressure by never-ending immigration-invasion. In a homogeneous society, the have-lesses have moral advantage over the have-mores by pressing for more equality. In a heterogeneous society, the have-mores claim moral advantage over the have-lesses by pushing for more diversity. As newcomers always apply more competitive pressure to the lower/middle class than to the upper class, the latter obviously has far less to lose. Of course, no one explained why More Diversity is more just. Where is the justice in allowing ceaseless flows of foreigners to take over one's own nation?
The culmination of all the ideological transformations has resulted in political schizophrenia. The NATURAL position for progressives would be to attack the winners as hoggers of wealth and power. But in the New Order, the winner class has rebranded itself as bobo-hipster-proggy. Even in the 1980s, there was the hatred of the Reaganite-Thatcherite yuppie. Consider the vapid yuppies of Oliver Stone's WALL STREET and Mike Leigh's NAKED. And AMERICAN PSYCHO was meant to expose the crass soullessness of yuppie mentality(though its author, Bret Easton Ellis, has been accused of being a soulless zombie himself). In the post-Counterculture era of 'Reaganomic 80s', the boomer professionals were so immersed in success and money that they neglected politics and ideology. But over time, especially under Billy Boy Clinton, the cultural elites formulated a way by which the new affluent class(to be labeled the 'creative class') could both reap the rewards AND shroud themselves with proggy 'righteousness'. One way was to turn leftism from Mayday to Gayday, from one of class politics to ass 'frolitics'. This worked like magic because homos are so vain, fancy-pants, and love to serve the rich. So, with homos as the dominant face of 'new progressivism', the main theme became amenable to Jewish elites and rich boomers.
This robbed progressivism of the opportunity to bash its traditional nemesis. If indeed progressives are supposed to be leftist and for egalitarianism, their natural enemies should be the rich class, especially those in the financial sector, vice industries, and inheritance jackpot. But the rich class — the likes of Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, Mark Zuckerberg, Michael Bloomberg, etc. — has come to own 'new progressivism' that went about prioritizing the destruction of anyone who refuses to bake 'gay wedding cakes' and objects to men in dress & wig to wee-wee in the Lady's Room. This does NOTHING to challenge the power of the rich. If anything, the oligarchs in Wall Street, Hollywood, and Silicon Valley are cracking up that proglodytes in the US and EU can be worked up into a frenzy over silly issues about homos and trannies. Or 'slut pride'.
Surely, proglodytes in colleges, especially lesser ones, are really envious and resentful of students in better colleges majoring in prestigious fields with far greater prizes down the road. Those specializing in medicine, business, computers, science/technology, corporate law, and such will reap the most rewards. Those in humanities, history, arts, education, and especially various 'schools of resentment' will gain the least success. Many will be burdened with huge student debts with college degrees that are useless in the market place.
So, naturally, a college graduate with degree in Crazy Negro Studies or Bitchy Grrrl Studies will face a less promising future than someone with a degree in computers or finance. Since politics is driven by envy and resentment(though such emotions are masked as 'justice'), proglodytes should direct their ire at the Mark Zuckerbergs and Sergei Brins of the world. But because prog losers were taught from cradle that the true meaning of 'progress' is all about Diversity, Homomania, and fighting 'racism', they can easily be directed to bark up other trees, indeed far smaller ones. Because today's rich elites make all the correct-sounding noises about More Immigration, More Homo Celebration, and More Magic Negro Worship, the loser proglodytes feel obligated to praise and support the rich progoligarchs. "They may be stinking rich and greedy, BUT at least their hearts are in the right place. Besides, gee whiz, without the rich oligarchs using their monopoly-muscle to do the right thing, the Nazis, KKK, White Supremacists, Racists, Homophobes, and Misogynists may take over and kill all of us!" Thus, the all-powerful globo-homo-shlomo oligarchs are seen as the 'lesser evil' or 'necessary evil', the bulwark against the rising tide of 'white nationalism'. Just like the rich class, during the Cold War, fooled Middle America into supporting its greedy agenda with scare tactics of "It's either us or the communists!", the rich class today fools proglodyte masses into supporting monopoly capitalism with scaremongering tactics of "It's either us or the fascists!" The Jewish elites who advise the oligarchs understand the dynamics of radical psychology and how to manipulate it. They know that proglodytes must still scream, rant, and holler about something. After all, the entire millennial generation has been raised on the Trigger-Happy Politics of Outrage. It's about me-hugging self-righteous displays of holier-than-thou virtue, a neo-puritanism. Since they cannot attack the rich and powerful(who are morally shielded by their support of globo-homomania), they look around and strike out at easy targets, like wussy professors or an odd conservative on campus.
But then, these wussy professors brought it on themselves by favoring Neo-Stalinism. Now, by 'Neo-Stalinism', I don't mean they are ideologically Stalinist in the Marxist-Leninist sense. I highly doubt if most so-called leftist professors in our time want forced collectivization of agriculture or mass executions of 'class enemies'(though some of them, especially Jewish ones, seem to fantasize about mass murder of white males and mass-rape of white women, mostly by blacks and Portnoic Jews). By Neo-Stalinism, I mean the favoring of machine politics over individual brilliance. Even though people with individual brilliance can be totalitarian and tyrannical in their outlook, they tend more towards free discourse than less brilliant people do. Why? Because the brilliant have confidence in their ability to argue and win the debate. This was why Leon Trotsky failed against Josef Stalin. Trotsky himself was autocratic and ruthless, but he was less totalitarian-minded(at least within the Soviet hierarchy) because he thought he could win with wit and brilliance. Stalin was smart and experienced, but he couldn't match wits with Trotsky or other top Jews. So, the ONLY way Stalin could win was by building up machine politics. He organized an army of cadres who were dim but obedient. They were loyal to him like dogs and attacked anyone he set them upon. George Orwell in ANIMAL FARM has the Stalin-Pig Napoleon get his way every time by threatening to unleash his attack dogs on any beast who naysays his authority.
The really smart intellectuals on the Left tend to be less totalitarian. Christopher Hitchens had confidence in his ability to take on anyone and win or at least hold his own. Steven Pinker also has self-confidence. But a lot of academics and intellectuals are really hacks or colorless. They lack brilliance or the nerves to match wits on a one-on-one basis. So, they prefer the Stalinist machine-politics way over the Trotsky my-brilliance way. They'd rather create an army of anti-intellectual(or at best pseudo-intellectual)goons who will learn and obey than think and notice. They are more 'taboosters' than taboo-busters. They would rather have obedient goons than free-thinkers. The danger, however, is that goons can get out of control(especially if they are Crazy Negroes, as with BLM fiasco). Unlike Stalin and Mao who had the means to clamp down on radical 'adventurism', the Neo-Stalinist professors are helpless when their own goons bark and bite at them for being insufficiently 'woke'. (To be sure, even many smart Jews now seek to shut down free speech in favor of Neo-Stalinist control of society, and the reasons are twofold. Some smart Jews feel that Donald Trump's victory is a harbinger of anti-intellectual Pitchfork Politics of yahoos who think and act as a Mob. They feel that such people are incapable of free & open debate and are impervious to evidence & logic to boot. The white mobs are mere dry wood for radical 'white nationalist' flames, and so, better to dampen them before they catch fire. But another bunch of smart Jews fear free speech because they sense that no amount of their wit and brilliance can argue against obvious truths such as Jewish domination of America, Zionist imperialism against Palestinians, facts about race, there being only two sexes[than 50 genders], black crime, and etc. While smart people can outwit and out-talk the less smart, just like adults can fool children, there is a limit to sophistry, however brilliant it may be. Just like kids eventually find out and learn to trust adults less, goyim have a reached a point where, via free and open exchange of ideas and information, they could arrive at the truth about Jewish Power and its hidden agendas. Thus, even smart Jews increasingly dread free speech because they fear that even their wits and brilliance cannot keep duping the dimwit goyim forever.)
Now, is PC really the most powerful force in the US? We tend to associate PC with puritanism, but hedonism exerts greater force in the West, and current PC is a strange combo of neo-puritanism and wanton puerile-ism. After all, why did Jews, Homos, and Negroes become so powerful? There is the Shoah thing, slavery thing, and AIDS thing(caused by homos themselves) to be sure, but most people don't think of such things 24/7. Most people seek pleasure, and the fact is Jews, blacks, and homos won out because of their dominance of hedonics. Jews control comedy, wit, entertainment. Blacks got music, sports, and sex culture. Homos are into fashion, vanity, and celebrity culture. 'Celebristianity' is the new christianity. Once basic needs are met, people mainly live for pleasures: Consider the exponential rise in gambling, video games, pop music, pornography, celebrity mania, drugs(with meth having killed countless poor whites), homo bacchanalia almost all year round, dances such as 'twerking', and etc. So, it seems Poo-C counts more than PC. (Poo-C meaning 'pussy' and poo-ride of homos.)
We can see the power of hedonics in US politics as well. Since the 1960 election, the rule of hedonics led to the more hedonic candidate winning. The more-hedonic-candidate is one who seems more 'fun'. That's why John F. Kennedy beat Richard Nixon. Though Lyndon B. Johnson wasn't 'fun', he was more fun than Barry Goldwater. Richard Nixon wasn't fun, but Hubert Humphrey wasn't the life of the party either. And George McGovern, though the leader of the debauchers, was a dull guy. Jimmy Carter was more fun than Gerald Ford. Ronald Reagan, former actor, was more fun than Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale. George H.W. Bush, though not fun, was still more fun than the bloodless Michael Dukakis who had nothing of Zorba about him. Billy Boy Clinton was lot more fun than Bush and Bob Dole. George W. Bush, aka Dubya, was more fun than square Al Gore and droopy John Kerry. Barack Obama was more fun than Mr. MaGoo McCain and Mormon Mitt Romney. And Donald Trump was more fun than Hillary Clinton. (Maybe Bernie Sanders would have beaten Hillary if he told more jokes like a Jewish comedian.)
Some Jews are pondering if Jews should count as 'white'. After all, the notion of 'whiteness' has been much pilloried in the academia, media, and the state, not least by JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power. Therefore, Jews find it problematic to count as white because white goyim are routinely scapegoated for just about everything... unless the white goyim happen to be 'gay' or 'gayim'. But then, there could be another problem arising from Jews rejecting whiteness. After all, if Jews don’t count as white and are gauged as a stand-alone group, it means they can easily be identified as the Most Powerful Group because Jewish privilege, the biggest privilege in the world, could no longer hide behind the veil of ‘whiteness’. If Jewish Privilege no longer counts as 'white', people might begin to awaken to the fact that Jews control the US, thereby the world.
The result is the paradox of Jews both vilifying and identifying with whiteness. Why would they identify with a group that they vilify the most? It's because the biggest Jewish fear is being exposed as a people of immense power, wealth, and influence, all of which suggest supremacist tendencies among Jews. Thus, Jews are Zelig-ish by nature, indeed even within the community. Barbra Streisand made YENTL, a story about a Jewish woman who pretends to be a man to gain access to education and, in the same year(1983), Woody Allen came out with ZELIG where a Jew morphs into other identities while, deep inside, remaining the Eternal Jew. The paradox of Jewish character is that Jews mastered the art of adapting into non-Jewish modes not for genuine assimilation but to protect the core 'nest egg' of Jewishness deep within. It's no wonder Albert Brooks in LOST IN AMERICA, as the wandering Jewish yuppie, is so obsessed with the notion of the Nest Egg. Jews know that they amassed a lot of power, wealth, and privilege by means foul as well as fair. Therefore, the last thing Jews want is to be blamed for all the dirty tricks they pulled. Consider Jews and blacks. Jewish agents and managers ripped off a lot of blacks, and a lot of blacks know this. And Jews know it too. But in their effort to maintain the political alliance between Jews and blacks, Jews get awful upset if blacks mention past Jewish behavior in bad light. But if blacks blame 'whites' instead for all the bad things Jews did to them, that is acceptable to Jews. #HollywoodSoJewish is not okay, but #HollywoodSoWhite is okay. So, if a black person was conned by a Jew, and if he says, "A Jew ripped me off", Jews hiss with anger. But if the Negro says, "A WHITEY ripped me off", Jews breathe a sigh of relief and show their approval. Therefore, it's very convenient for Jews to identify as 'white' for the time being.
Of course, by invoking the Shoah endlessly, Jews also make themselves out to be the biggest victims of whites or 'white supremacists'. Disingenuously, Jews pretend the Shoah happened out of the blue for no reason when, if anything, it was an extreme and radical reaction to much horrible behavior on the part of Jews. In many respects, the Shoah was a Counter-Holocaust in response to the holocausts committed by Jewish communists and World Jewry on goyim. Before there was the Jewish Holocaust carried out by Nazi Germans, there was the Slavo-Holocaust carried out in large part by Jewish radicals. In that sense, The Holocaust should really be called the Counter-Holocaust. Horrible Jewish behavior inspired horrible German behavior. Tragically, JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power is at it again in the 21st century as the Jews have become the New Nazis or Judeo-Nazis.
In the Current Year, the Cult of Privilege is less about having privilege than being branded with its label. It is rather like an inversion of the concept of the titled aristocracy. After all, the privilege of nobility was not so much about wealth & means as about blood & lineage secured through titles passed down through generations. So, one could be broke and out of luck but still be regarded as a 'duke', ‘count’ or ‘baron’.
Likewise, the cult of ‘white privilege’ isn’t about all white people really having or enjoying privilege. It means being labeled with this historical stain of ‘privilege’. It is something ALL whites inherit, like the Mark of Cain. No matter how poor or downtrodden(or tyrannized by black thugs) a white person may be, he is forced to own the negative-title of ‘white privilege’. John the Oppressor. Bob the Tyrant. Jerry the Bigot. Ron the Hater. Whitey = Evil.
Given how this works, if Jews un-whiten themselves, they could earn the Special Privilege of being forgiven their own privilege of immense power and wealth. Even if Jews remain rich or get richer, their un-white-ness provides them with the special dispensation of not being tainted with moral wickedness that is thought to be uniquely white. (But then, as noted above, Jews-as-Jews than Jews-as-whites will open up a whole new can of worms when it comes to the issue of uber-privilege as Jews have more money and privilege than any other group. Jews-as-Jews may no longer be stained with whiteness, but then, they will no longer be able to launder bad Jewish behavior as 'bad WHITE behavior.')
If you’re black, brown, or homo, you can be as rich, famous, well-connected, and/or privileged as possible without any blame or accusation. Not being white gives you the privilege of denying your privilege even if you, as an individual, has lots of it. That group advantage, in and of itself, is an immense kind of privilege. And some Jews may be hoping for the same thing as they explore the possibilities to detaching Jewishness from whiteness.
After all, white Hispanics enjoy such PC privilege. Being ‘Hispanic’ makes them non-white, and that means they can be as rich as Carlos Slim the Lebanese. They don't count as one of the ‘privileged’ since privilege is only attached to non-Hispanic whiteness. Incredibly enough, white Latinos, the descendants of the first European Conquistadors of the Americas who did so much plundering and pillaging, hide behind the veil of 'people of color'. Meanwhile, to confuse matters even further, even brown natives of 'Latin America' without a drop of white blood are referred to as 'Hispanic' or 'Latino'(or now 'Latinx').
The concept of Privilege according to PC isn’t a condition based on actual wealth or power. It is an inheritance. So, no matter how rich a Negro, Dotkin(Hindu), or Conqui(or Conkey, or White Hispanic) becomes, he is not associated with the Problem of Privilege. In contrast, no matter how poor a white person may be, he or she is forced to inherit the negative title/curse of ‘white privilege’. It really stinks how the shame-game is rigged.
Maybe, whites should twist this around and come up with the concept of White Prestige. Invoking Charles Murray’s HUMAN ACHIEVEMENT, they should say 97% of all contributions to mankind came from whites, therefore, ALL whites are worthy of inheriting White Prestige and White Pride FOR ALL TIME. This way, even the dumbest white dolt will have more prestige than the smartest non-white individual who contributes something of great value. Yes, all whites inherit White Prestige and demand respect from all the world that owes everything to white achievement.
According to PC, this stain or inheritance of ‘white privilege’ is something whites can never be rid of. It's like a scar that marks one for life. The stamp of 'white privilege' is meant to be more resilient that the seal of nobility. It's meant to stick to whites like skunk spray.
If a nobleman was really down on his luck, he could at least sell his title and be rid of it… and end up like the descendants like TESS OF THE D'URBERVILLES. In contrast, ‘white privilege’ is like the blood on the hands of Lady Macbeth. It won’t fade no matter how much it's washed AS LONG AS white folks remain psycolonized by PC. It's like a chronic infestation by parasites that are nearly impossible to eradicate... unless one takes a drastic measure. At this point, only total White Liberation from JSP will bring an end to the cult of White Guilt.
Paradoxically, the current PC is devised to reward whites with real privilege while punishing whites without privilege. The Globo-Homo-Shlomo Order allows privileged whites to keep their privilege AS LONG AS they denounce 'white privilege' and shower contempt on the white hoi polloi. Why would this be? It's the Jewish Way of using carrots to ensure that privileged whites will obey and serve them. As comprador-collaborators of the Empire of Judea, privileged whites get to enjoy status and wealth. If Jews allow such whites to enjoy so much privilege, why do Jews insist that they condemn 'white privilege'? Why are Jews allowing certain whites to have so much white privilege while, at the same time, making them denounce 'white privilege' among whites who have NO privilege? It's really because what Jews fear most is not 'white privilege' — after all, Jews got more White Privilege than other white groups — but white unity, and by making privileged white dump on unprivileged whites, Jews are making sure there is no unity of white elites and white masses. Jewish message to white elites is "You can keep your privilege AS LONG AS you shit on the white masses. You, as white elites, must serve us Jews as your masters than lead white folks as your people." Then, it's hardly surprising that privileged whites can afford to attend the right kind of schools, make the right kind of donations, and make the right kind of gestures so as to present themselves as ‘good whites’. They can afford Magic Soap to wash away some of the stain of 'white privilege'. In contrast, less fortunate whites can’t afford to do so, and they become ‘deplorables’, so grimy and soiled with ‘white privilege’.
Because rich whites can afford to be ‘good whites’ and buy special dispensations — like the Clintons, Bidens, Pelosis, and the rest of them — , we have a surreal situation in this country where rich ‘liberal’ whites and rich cuck-whites can pose as less ‘privileged’ than deplorable poorer whites who can’t afford magic soap to wash away the dirt of ‘white privilege’. It is another kind of Dirt Gap... or the Dirty Gap.
Of course, even for PC-approved privileged whites, the stain of ‘white privilege’ never goes away. Unlike Jews, blacks, and homos who are idolized as naturally and unconditionally clean(no matter what they do), even the 'goodest of the good' whites are stained with the 'original sin' and the Mark of Cain of 'white privilege' and 'white guilt', and therefore, they must always make an effort to show that they wash day in and day out to remain clean. It's as if whites are like Pig-Pen of Peanuts comics. Still, rich and well-connected whites can still afford the Magic Soap that makes them seem 'cleaner' than the deplorables.
We now live in a crazy nation where the general impression is that lower class whites got more ‘white privilege’ than upper-class whites do. It’s not about who has more actual wealth and privilege but who can better afford to wash away some of that stain with Woke Soap. Magic Soap sure is expensive. Hope Soap makes Bill Gates and Warren Buffet seem cleaner of 'white privilege' than white deplorables who, down on their luck, are realizing that they're all on their own and without white leadership. Their only hope is White Liberation from JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power.
The Christo-Formula seems to be the basis of PC strategy and its idolization of Jugromo(Judeo-Negro-Homo) Sanctimony.
Consider this scene from MONTY PYTYHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN:
What really sticks out is that the Holy Victim-Victor Group wants to be, at once, mollycoddled(or poli-coddled), bereaved, and worshiped. Baby-Victim-Victor or BVV Syndrome. Consider the mytho-legend and iconography of Jesus. There is Jesus as a cute and cuddly baby in all those paintings of the Madonna. People's hearts go out to the darling little child. Then, there is Jesus as saint-prophet who was rejected and victimized by cruel & brutal humanity. People are made to feel guilt over His noble torment, death, and self-sacrifice. And then, there is Jesus as the returned champion, the King of kings, indeed none other than the Son of God.
So, within the Christo-Formula universe, the faithful feel (1) protective compassion for the cute baby Jesus (2) profound guilt over the murdered Messiah and (3) ecstatic adoration of the King of kings, all-time spiritual champ. It appeals to several key aspects of human emotions.
Jesus as helpless baby
Jesus as martyr, tragic object of guilt
Jesus as triumphant King of kings
When we consider Homos(and Trannies) as members of the Holy Three(along with Jews and Negroes), we see a similar kind of emotional manipulation at play. The recent controversy at Columbia University with Nimesh Patel and the (East)Asian-Alliance well illustrates this phenomenon. The reaction of the 'triggered' yellow dogs seems contradictory. On the one hand, it's as though they feel protective emotions over the weak, vulnerable, and cute-and-cuddly LGBTQXYZ community. Oh, those poor helpless 'rainbow' babies. They must be nestled in a crib and sung lullabies, goo. The homos and trannies have found a way to tug at the (oft-repressed)maternal instincts of the secular community(esp. among women who often put off motherhood). This is the passive babyish side of PC. Granted, babies are both helpless and 'tyrannical', i.e. they demand constant attention 24/7.
Anyway, because of the 'cute and cuddly' aspect of LGBTQXYZ Idolatry, so many people have a tendency to view homos and trannies as little baby darlings that need constant love and protection. And woe unto anyone who doesn't go along with this charade. Why, he's like a child abuser!
There is this with Jews and blacks too. Anne Frank is THE face of the Jewish Community after WWII. Just a sweet little girl who just wanted to have fun. What a cruel cruel world to deny her such. And Pop Culture has never lacked for the cute Negroling, such as Gary Coleman of DIFF'RENT STROKES and Emmanuel Lewis of WEBSTER. Many white people grew up looking at such darling Negro kibblers. And famous celebrities and cuckservatives like David French like to show off My Little Ebony like My Little Pony.
This mollycoddly side of PC is very effective in eliciting protective maternal instincts. Jews certainly know how this psychology works. Even though they are the most powerful group in America, they use Anne-Frank iconography and pop culture narratives of nice little Jewish kids bullied by Big Dumb Nazi Polacks to garner protective sympathy. Jews know how to push the buttons of protective-maternal-instinct so as to make it seem as though 'antisemitism' is like Big Bad Goy picking on a tiny Jewish child.
And even though so many problems of violence and criminality are caused by blacks, pop culture is saturated with images of too-good-to-be-true darling Negro kids with a glow about them. Or even fully grown Negroes are presented as possessing pure childlike souls, as with the mountain-sized Negro who wuvs a wittle white mouse in GREEN MILE. Even though he's the size of an entire football team, we are to believe he has the soul of the kid on WEBSTER.
This is why the LGBTQXYZ agenda is so hellbent on promoting homosexuality and even tranny-cult among kids. By concocting a cutesy cherubic as a feature of the iconography of Queertianity, Homomania comes to be shielded by protective maternal instincts of the Normies who easily fall for PC(as they'd been deracinated and deculturalized of their true identity, values, and heritage). After all, who wants to be seen as being AGAINST DARLING INNOCENT KIDS? Granted, this is a gambit on the part of LGBTQXYZ agenda because many people will be grossed out by the sexual perversion of children, but then, many others will feel that LGBTQXYZ is especially special and in need of protection because "It's all about the children!" Just like Open Borders activists associate Illegal Migration-Invasion with images of poor helpless children(from Syria or Guatemala), the publicists and commissars of Homomania drag little kids around to pull on maternal heartstrings of women around the world. And women are especially vulnerable because feminism has fostered repression of their healthy maternal drives to have children and be good mothers.
And then, there is of course the Guilt Element when it comes to Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Just like Christianity says Jesus was the perfect Man who was wronged by a tyrannical empire and cruel mob, we are told that Jews, blacks, and homos were always the most wonderful people wronged by history and humanity. The entire history of Jews is presented to us as a narrative of the noblest & kindest people always having been set upon by bigoted goy populations. Jews were never wrong, and it was always the fault of the deranged goyim(especially white ones). And if you say different, you're an 'anti-Semite', as bad as a child abuser(or even molester). And never mind black Africa was always dark and violent place. Oh no, blacks were always wonderful & noble and living in harmony with nature and each other... and if it weren't for evil whitey, Africa might be one big Wakanda. Apparently, blacks have always been pure and noble, but Evil White 'Racism' caused all this harm to a perfect people(along with Jews).
As for homos, they are angels, and Reagan and Jerry Falwell were to blame for the AIDS epidemic in the homo community that killed so many people. Just watch PHILADELPHIA and weep for pure-souled 'gay baby-man' who dies as a saint. AIDS was like Homocaust that spiraled out of control because of indifference and 'homophobia'. Never mind all the sick orgies and homo fecal penetration done by homos.
And then, there is the element of awe at the sheer power of Negroes, Homos, and Jews. Negroes dominate so much of pop music, sports, and sexual idolatry. They are the Official Heroes of every city during NBA and NFL seasons. French worship Negroes as demigods who won the World Cup. BBC propaganda promotes black-males as the rightful sexual owners of white women because white men are now to be demoted into dorky cucky-wuck losers vis-a-vis the more muscular and bigger-donged Negroes. As for Homos, why looky! They are so creative, so flamboyant, so colorful, and so celebratory of everything they do. They stoke our own vanity and narcissism by promoting self-celebration as the defining 'value' of the globo-homo 21st century. In our post-religious age, Homo-worship is THE central 'spiritual' experience for many secular urbanites. And even those who still attend churches love to decorate their churches with 'gay' colors.
And the most awesome power of them all, the Jews! Jews are so powerful in finance, media & entertainment, law & courts, academia & think-tanks, vice industries(such as gambling), big pharma, high-tech, and Deep State(and Dark State). They are the makers and breakers of anyone and anything. They can even make a big-name personality like Alex Jones disappear from entire platforms. They can push a button and make US politicians whore out to Israel and turn much of the Middle East upside down with Wars for Israel. They can bring back the 'cold war' with Russia just because they hate Russia. They can make the US enforce sanctions against Iran and send billions in aid to Israel even though Iran allows inspections and has no nukes whereas Israel stole American uranium and has 300 nukes. They can shut down Free Speech with lawfare against 'hate speech'(to be determined by ADL and SPLC, both Jewish-funded groups). They can make every nation erect Shoah Monuments and worship 'Holocaust-Survivors' as bigger than God and Jesus. That is some power.
Now, people have a Will to Cower, and countless minions kneel at the Altar of Power. But there is also a natural tendency of people to fear power, worry about power, distrust power, feel envy about power, and speak truth to power... and rise up against power. So, power merely as awesomeness is vulnerable. Paradoxically, power is even more powerful when the awesomeness is associated with emotions of guilt and coddle. This was the genius of the Christo-Formula, one reason why Christian Power lasted for so long. It played on all three key emotions of menfolk(and womenfolk): Affection & tenderness for something cute-and-cuddly, Guilt & Remorse for Purity-and-Nobility, and Awe for the Power. And even though these emotions are different(and even contradictory), they reinforced one another as an Iron Triangle.
And now, PC has appropriated the Christo-Formula for the Jugromo trinity. So, those Asian students at Columbia were emoting and acting on three levels. They were sucking up to the Cult of Awesome Negroes and Tremendous Trannies; they were servile dogs of the Power and Prestige. But they were also acting in accordance to instilled guilt associated with holy Homos and noble Negroes. And, finally, their maternal instincts kicked into gear as they'd grown accustomed to regarding Homos/Trannies and Negroes as precious little babies whose cribs need to be protected from the scary howls of the Big Bad Bogeyman.
Sometimes, it may seem as though the PC crowd just doesn't get the joke. Often, the problem is they do get it and just can't handle it. Likely, the Asian attendees at the event got the Nimesh Patel joke, and that is why he had to be Babu-ed or Baboo-ed. As well-trained dogs of PC(that serves as the manual for status-striving), Asian-Americans were predictably 'triggered'. Yellow dogs have a tendency to seek approval and follow, and in the Current Year, 'gay rights' are blessed Gay Rites.
Now, jokes are generally triggering and 'offensive'. Usually, someone or something is the object of mockery, the 'target' or 'victim'. It could be the other or it could be the self, usually the case with Joan Rivers and Rodney Dangerfield, the man who never got any respect.
Humor usually doesn't go well together with holiness and reverence, matters that call for sanctimony. When mockery of a sacred cow is tolerated, the once holy cow looks like holy shit. Perhaps, it was less Darwin & Marx and more Marx Brothers that did in Christianity & Bourgeois morals. One can never look at opera in the same way after NIGHT AT THE OPERA.
Peter Ustinov's take on an ill-fated production of Richard Wagner's SIEGRIED is hilarious. One can hardly watch that scene with 'solemnity' and straight face anymore. Video at 40:05.
And the Old Elites of Europe relied heavily on pomp and spectacle, the stuff of awe and reverence that kings and noblemen relied upon to justify their privilege and dominance.The Order sensed that, once people began to see the rulers as laughable and ridiculous, the status quo was doomed. Pompous elites could be weakened with humor or fanatical anti-humor. With the rise of modernity, mass media, and growing cynicism(especially in urban areas), people began to chuckle about kings, queens, and idiot prince who seemed increasingly out-of-place and even 'alien' in the New Order created by the power of money and machines. Sometimes, humor and rage aren't that far apart.
In the case of Iran, the mass revolt vilified the Shah as both a ridiculous clown and an impotent shill. The most fanatical within the uprising soon lost their sense of humor and thirsted for blood. Same in Cambodia with the Khmer Rouge. And certain Russian/Jewish communists weren't big on humor either. Think of the character of Strelnikov in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO.
But in the capitalist West, the general way(often Jewish) of subverting The Order was through humor(and pornography as in Weimar Germany). In some cases, laughter at one authority was the flip-side of grim commitment to another authority, the new boss.
Consider how the soldiers laugh at the elite officer in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO, but mockery is soon followed by brutal violence and bloodthirsty hate. Whatever the ultimate agenda or outcome, few things are as effective as laughter in de-legitimizing authority. This is why PC can't abide by humor directed at what it deems holy. If humor could bring down respect/reverence for kings, ideologies, and God Himself, it can bring down just about anything.
Why does the urbane sophisticate finally lose his cool in ALL ABOUT EVE? He becomes the object of laughter. He's used to being the wit than outwitted. And Humbert's biggest humiliation in LOLITA is that he's just a butt of jokes to Quilty.
Humor can be gentle or G-rated(like on the TV show HEE-HAW) but is most effective when racy and irreverent(or, at the furthest reach, surreal). (Potty-mouthed 'X-rated' stand-up routines with nonstop twaddle about sex and genitals are mostly tiresome with few exceptions: Sam Kinison and Eddie Murphy, esp. Mr T. as a 'faggot' routine.) Edgy humor stings its 'victims' with potency. It can be downright lethal. Granted, humor is often self-effacing or double-edged, passive/aggressive. It often mocks the mocker along with the mocked, like with the Mexican Restaurant scene in SANFORD AND SON, a show with many 'Hispanic' jokes that spring back on Fred G. Sanford as a black bigot.
The passive/aggressive nature of humor elicits both self-pity and confidence in the audience. On some level, the audience identifies with the comic/clown(for whom nothing seems to go right) because everyone has problems. And by laughing at the comic's 'problems', the audience 'therapeutically' comes to laugh at their own with similar overtones. Thus, there is no clear line between comic-as-them and comic-as-us. Because the comic is given to exaggeration, the audience is relieved to find that their problems aren't so bad, and yet, the exaggeration is of situations all-too-familiar to many people. But then, because the comic has the balderdash to spell out his 'problems' and give the middle-finger to the world, he is also a figure of confidence, even arrogance. He becomes kind of 'heroic'. And yet, there is ambiguity in his middle-finger. Is it for the audience or for the audience?
Now, in our post-religious age, nothing should be sacrosanct, but as Jonathan Haidt and others have remarked, human psychology is drawn to righteous holy-schmoliness, and new 'gods' are elevated by cultural consensus shaped by elite academia and mass media. Certain figures and narratives become de facto sacred even if ostensibly part of secular culture & politics. MLK, (Harvey)Milk, and Mandela aren't regarded as gods in the literal sense but treated as figures of idol-worship nevertheless. Homos are associated with New Agey 'rainbow' colors, Jews always with the Shoah, and blacks with slavery(as an evil second only to Shoah according to the current Jewish-dominated narrative hellbent on milking 'white guilt' for all it is worth) and Civil Rights Movement, the Manichean Narrative of which is about stark Good vs Evil with no grey in between.
Granted, there has been a schizo element in trying to sustain reverential thoughts about Jews, blacks, and homos. After all, even as Jews insist on being regarded solemnly as the Shoah People, their natural tendency is to be subversive, perverse, and insulting. So, when we think of Jews, the mask of Anne Frank often peels off to reveal Sarah Silverman. Blacks demand we see them as the 'We Shall Overcome' people, but so much of black culture is crazy, trashy, ugly, and demented(and proud of it). We live in the Age of Mandela and Twerking, of black reverends and black rappers. In a way, Quentin Tarantino's INGLORIOUS BASTERDS and DJANGO UNCHAINED conveyed this schizo aspect of Jews and blacks as Sacred Monsters: Consider their Moralism + Sadism, or Sado-Moralism. And then, there are homos. It's amazing how many people have been led to remember the AIDS epidemic as a kind of homo-holocaust when it was the result of sodomites butt-banging one another like rabbits-in-heat.
Now, what was Nimesh Patel's great 'sin'? It was simply that he mocked blackness and homosexuality. (Good thing he left out the Jews or else the controversy would have been greater.) Now, one could argue that his jokes were ultimately sympathetic to blacks and homos, i.e. those groups have a tough time due to 'racism' and 'homophobia'. Still, he made a joke of issues related to sacrosanct groups, and PC will not tolerate mockery of the holy-schmolies. It undermines sober reverence of the main idols of PC. Humor, inebriated with anarchic spirit, forgets what is holy and pokes fun at just about everything. PC demands a teetotaler brand of humor that is always mindful of what can and can't be said. One might say humor has entered the Prohibition Era, and who knows, maybe humor(with anarchic intoxicant content) will go underground as a form of gangsterism.
If Patel had joked in such manner about any other group, even Asians, there wouldn't have been a fuss. But Jews, homos, and Negroes are are not to be mocked; and the insistence is the product of both PC indoctrination/idolatry and craven cowardice. After all, surely the yellow dogs in college campuses know that the most vocal and hostile groups tend to be Jews, blacks, and homos. Piss off one of them, and all hell may break loose. So, to prevent homo and/or black outrage directed at Asians, Asians shut down a fellow 'bad' Asian to preemptively signal that they are with the PC program 100%. They understand that we must all revere and quasi-worship the Holy Schmoly Three of Jews, blacks, and homos.
If anything, the joke-that-no-one-got within the purview of the recent event is that these Asians sure lived up to racial stereotypes as the ever-so-obedient, ever-so-conformist, and ever-so-predictable yellow dogs. They made it plain as day that they suck up to power and kowtow before the Official Narrative. Since blacks and homos are holy in the Jewish-controlled West, Asian yellow dogs worship at the altar of Obligatory Iconography. The perimeters of humor are to remain within permissible bounds.
Because Jews control the Power and designated themselves, blacks, and homos as the Holy Three, most Americans are nervous about saying anything that might be construed as neo-blasphemous and offensive to precious sensitivities of the Holy Three. Granted, Jews can joke about Jews, blacks can joke about blacks, and homos can joke about homos... but everyone else better watch out, and furthermore, Jews, homos, and blacks must be careful not to step on each other's toes in their Holy Culture Waltz. As for Asians(especially yellow East Asians), they come from status-obsessed conformist cultures, and therefore, they(especially sheepish and dog-like East Asians) tend toward conformity with the Prevailing Dogma(of whichever society they happen to reside in) to gain status points. This isn't really about 'safe spaces' but about status-points. Especially because Asian Identity lacks intrinsic value in the Western PC scorecard, Asians yearn to latch onto one or all of the Holy Three. Asians-as-Asian having no value, Asians seek value in roles as Asians-for-Jews/Israel, Asians-for-blacks, and/or Asians-for-homos. In this way, yellows are like pseudo-white-people. Just like whites, having been robbed of autonomous worth by PC, have no choice but to gain moral worth by latching themselves in service to Jews, blacks, and/or homos(as the Holy Three), Asians feel they must also latch onto the Holies to have any worth. So, Asians-for-Asians is regarded as a yawn or irritation, and that means Asians can feel righteous only by cheering or championing the Holy Three. Because Asians-for-Asians is regarded as petty and selfish by PC(whereas blacks-for-blacks, homos-for-homos, and Jews-for-Jews are regarded as the noblest commitments), 'woke' Asians go out of their way to show that they prioritize the interests of Jews, blacks, or homos over their own. Whether it's Nikki Haley or Amy Chua sucking up to Jews OR the Asian Alliance at Columbia University sucking up to blacks and homos, it's obvious that Asian themes have no moral or spiritual currency in the West. Hindu browns and Far East yellows must suck up to the Three Holies. Incidentally, one crucial difference between whites and yellows is that, whereas whites lack intrinsic value due to the cult of 'white guilt', yellows lack intrinsic value due to their perceived 'lameness'. Asian women have some 'hot' value but as sexual subjects to be owned by other races.
Now, why are some peoples holier than others? After all, isn't our 'progressive' society all about 'equality'? One reason is Jews have the power, and Jews get to decide who is or isn't holy. It's simple as that, and Jews are of course going to favor themselves and their key political allies. The other reason is that the core formula for being part of Holy Three is as follows: Possession of Superior Ability + Possession of Victim Narrative. Why does a particular group receive more sympathy for its victimhood IF it is perceived as having superior qualities? Because there is the sense that a SUPERIOR and even god-like people have been wronged. Thus, it seems more tragic than if a 'lame' or mediocre people had been wronged. Why do we feel more tragic when a lion than a warthog is killed(even though warthogs are intelligent animals too)? It's because we admire lions as the superior hunter, the king of the jungle, whereas we regard warthogs as just ugly prey animals. After all, who ever got enraged in the West over some white hunter who killed a warthog?
Because blacks are admired as superior athletes, singers with louder voices, and studs with bigger dongs(or sexy ho's with bouncier booties), they are admired in the West as the superior race. People may not consciously think so but they sensually feel it, and feelings go a long way in shaping society. (It's like most men are more likely to help a pretty woman in distress than a fat ugly one. It's not conscious but subconscious bias. Most men probably see themselves as decent fellers who'd care equally for anyone in need of help, but reality plays out differently based on people's feelings.) Because of differences in perceptions about race, the history of slavery and Jim Crow seems especially unjust because blacks, a Superior People, were wronged. In contrast, there is far less sympathy for American Indians even though they suffered something worse than slavery. They suffered 'genocide' and permanent loss of their land due to massive immigration-imperialism. Given the 'genocidal' impact of immigration-imperialism on American Indians, one might think PC would associate immigration with imperialism & historical 'sin', indeed the Original Sin of America. But not so. Instead, all we hear about immigration is that it's especially great because Jews, one of the Holy Threes, gained so much from it. Also, we are told that the Original Sin of America is black slavery, not the 'genocide' of the Red Man. Why? Blacks are deemed holier. Because American Indians can't sing and dance, don't excel in sports, and aren't seen as super-studs, their victim-hood is acknowledged as sad but dismissed as boring. (In some ways, the American Moral Paradox can be explained in terms of a people trying to cover up 'crimes' with crusades. Because America was founded upon 'genocide', slavery, imperialism, and massive destruction of natural wonders, it is easy to paint its history with blood, sweat, and tears, a saga of greed and plunder. Because of this moral crisis, one way to justify Americanism was to tirelessly associate its growth with never-ending crusades. "Offense is the best defense" as they say. The most surreal version of this is Tim Cook fulminating about necessary crusades against the 'sin' of 'hate speech' before the ADL. As we all now, Apple is a vile, greedy, and corrupt globalist company that uses semi-slave labor around the world. It has no qualms about doing business with tyrannical regimes like Saudi Arabia, one of the biggest sponsors of terrorism. It is also joined at the hip with the neo-imperialist Deep State that pushed wars that destroyed millions of lives. As for ADL, it is a hateful Zionist-imperialist organization that seeks to silence any criticism of Israel's murderous policies against Palestinians. If anything, Apple and ADL have a lot to answer for, but notice that Tim Cook goes on the moral offensive and accuses other people of 'sin'. But then, it's hardly surprising that homo-supremacist Tim Cook is so deferential to Jewish-Supremacist ADL. After all, Jewish Power was behind Homomania that elevated homos and trannies to the status of angels and demigods. Jews made people like Cook the new gods of America, and homo vanity is just fine with Jewish power. With Anno Sodomini, homos get to decide what is 'sinful'. So, it is 'sinful' to refuse to appease the filth of 'gay marriage', but homos waging ugly war on true morality and decency is never 'hateful' since Jews and Homos get to decide what is 'hate speech'. Tim Cook is of Christian background, but post-religious ilk like him, having lost their faith, seek new meaning in New Age lunacies like Homomania, especially as it stokes their 'gay' vanity as a superior breed.)
The formula for the Holy Three has roots in Christianity. If Jesus was just a man who got beaten and killed, it would have been just another sad story of a good man undone by powerful forces. Such men were dime-a-dozen throughout history. So, why did His story become so powerful? Because a Narrative developed that He wasn't just some guy with a helpful message but the Messiah. Humankind didn't just kill a Nice Person but the one and only Son of God. And so, Christians were filled with both great awe and massive guilt.
If white folks had brought over scrawny Vietnamese or meek Bolivian Indians to toil as slaves in America, there would have been no great respect or reverence for those peoples. And not much in the way of 'white guilt'. Even after Emancipation, such peoples would not have excelled in sports or pop music. And small Asian men or short brown men would not have been regarded as studs that can inspire 'fever' among white women and cucky-wuckery among white men(reduced to hapless 'white boys'). Also, as Asians and browns have weaker voices, men of oratorical power like MLK would not have emerged among them. Brown natives of Latin America suffered 'genocide', slavery, and oppression for centuries, but the attitude of even American Progressives is essentially "bring them over to cut our lawns, do our laundry, and change diapers." Americans of all ideologies regard browns as a race of permanent helots. In contrast, Americans regard blacks as the superior race due to black success in song, dong, and strong. Thus, whites feel more guilt about blacks because they came to realize that they'd once oppressed a 'cool' superior race of 'the greatest', as Muhammad Ali anointed himself. So, even though Americans like to tell themselves that they are all about 'equality' in terms of ideology, they favor some groups over others in terms of idolatry. Some groups have more idolatrous value than others, esp. because American sense of worth is largely determined by celebrity of sports, song, and sex.
Now, why do Jews and homos also have holy power? Jews are not successful in sports and the sexual attractive sweepstakes. Granted, many Jews were talented music composers(though often for black singers with more powerful voices). Still, Jews also have a combination of Superiority and Victimhood so essential to the Holy Formula. Jews can invoke the Shoah(as the greatest evil of all time) & history of persecution under Christians for their Victimhood Narrative. But Jews can also promote themselves as the Chosen People, the Genius People, the people of wit, and the people of wealth. So, Jews are regarded with awe. Awesomely tragic and awesomely triumphant. In contrast, Palestinians get no respect despite their undeniable victim-hood because they are seen as mediocre, uninspired, and lame. After all, where is the Palestinian Einstein or Mendelssohn? Where is the Palestinian Bob Dylan or Steven Spielberg? So, victim-hood isn't enough for a people to gain Holy-Schmoly status. To be one of the Holies, you need the formula of Victimhood + Superiority.
Homos also concocted a victim-narrative for themselves(of course with the invaluable support of the Jew-run media), but no less crucial is their perceived superiority. Because homos tend to be vain and narcissistic, they've gained notable success in fashion, entertainment, and upper echelons of privilege. It's like the rich in THE WOLF OF WALL STREET feel prestige in hiring a 'gay butler'. And because homos love to rub shoulders and dilly-dally with the rich and powerful, the privileged classes have come to see homos as loyal partners-in-crime(with better taste in decor and design). Granted, the homo victim-narrative centered around AIDS relies on twisted logic. HIV spread far and wide among homos because they were indulging in wild orgies at all times in all places. But because Jews control the media and prize homos for Favorite Ally Status, they've spun a PC narrative about homos as saints & angels destroyed by some 'homophobic' tragedy. So, HIV epidemic was more the product of Ronald Reagan's wickedness.
Anyway, the reason why the Asian Alliance shut down Patel was simply because he mocked two of the Holy Three. He didn't show 'due' deference when speaking of homos and blacks. Asians are sheepish status-seekers and predictably conform to prevailing socio-cultural dogma. It's a pattern we see over and over. Why was it that East Asians, despite possessing intelligence comparable to that of Western folks, failed to achieve the kind of progress and revolutionary breakthroughs that came to define European Civilizations? Because the Asian Character tends to be sheepish, obedient, and conformist. So, their minds were used mainly to gain status and seek approval from the existing power structure than to expand freedom and seek truth(beyond the dominant dogma). If not for the impact of Western incursions into East Asia, yellow people there would still be preparing for eight-legged Confucian essays to pass exams to become the same-old-same-old bureaucrats mouthing the tired truisms. Then, it is not surprising that East Asians in the West are such unoriginal yellow dogs who predictably toe the dominant line. Furthermore, having no intrinsic value or powerful self-identity in the West, the yellow dogs seek worth by begging for approval from the Holy Three: Jews, blacks, and homos. But then, dogs always seek out masters to serve. The main Asian trait is 'to serve' than 'to lead'. It is to be the dog than the master of history.
Apart from the Holy Three, no other people really matter in the West, especially if the people in particular have been wronged by the Holy Three. So, when blacks riot and burn down businesses, no one cares about the store-owners, many of whom are Arab or Muslim in depressed communities. Or when Zionists use brutal force on Palestinians, people look the other way or support Israel(as Congress and US presidents always do). Or when homos use their privilege to shut down bakeries & organizations that won't bend over to the 'Gay' Agenda, there is either sullen silence(among craven and cowardly 'conservatives' who dare not infuriate Jews who are behind Homomania) or ecstatic support of homo tyranny(among 'progressives' for whom immorality is the New Morality). The Holy Three are like the 'made men' in GOODFELLAS. They are free to roam and rule as they please.
How about Muslims? They are mere cannon fodder. Since Jews are holy and control the US, they continue to steer foreign policy to destroy any Muslim nation reviled as a 'threat to Israel', even though Israel is the main threat to all peaceful nations in the region. As a result, millions of Muslims have had their lives ruined in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Iran through wars, invasions, terrorism(sponsored by US and Israel), and sanctions. But who cares? After all, Muslims are mediocre and have no special talents. Sure, Jews feign sympathy for Muslim 'refugees' while willfully ignoring the fact that those nation-less Muslims are the result of Wars for Israel pushed by Jews who control the US. Ending Wars for Israel will stop turning Muslims into refugees, but Jews keep using whore-politicians(Clinton, Bush II, Obama, and Trump) to wage more Wars for Israel because Israel-Uber-Alles is the neo-religion of the West. Also, notice that Jews steer those Muslim 'refugees' into the West while Israel takes in not a single one(nor hands back stolen Golan Heights to Syria). If anything, Jews continue to steal more land in the West Bank. At any rate, the reason why Muslims get no love despite being victimized in a Jew-controlled world is because they aren't superior in wit(Jews), athleticism(blacks), or creativity(homos). So, who cares if millions of them die?
Same with Asians. Americans may have killed up to a 300,000 Filipinos(by indirect as well as indirect means) in the US-Philippines War, millions of Japanese in WWII(in a conflict in which the Western Imperialists were just as much to blame), millions of Koreans and Chinese in the Korean War, and millions of Vietnamese in the Vietnam War. The greatest killings done by the US were mostly in Asia. These wars resulted from US imperialist hegemony over Asia, but Asian victimization at the hands of the US doesn't count for much because Asians are seen as lame and boring grinds whose dominant theme is "Hey, be quiet, this is the library". Victim-hood without perceived superiority doesn't stir up much sympathy.
A single dead Jew, black, or homo is regarded more tragically than a million dead Muslims or Asians because Jews, blacks, and homos are perceived to possess superior qualities, whereas Muslims and Asians are seen as masses of faceless lame folks. But then, it seems most Asian-Americans are indeed pretty lame, conformist, and predictable given their attitudes in the West. Most being mere teacher's pets, they just regurgitate PC fed to them since kindergarten. They are 'good little boys' and 'good little girls' who never had an independent idea or value in their heads. Even when they act 'defiant' or 'rebellious', it is in total imitation of other peoples, esp. Jews, blacks, and homos. Asians are yellow dogs and copycats. There are exceptions to be sure, but as they say, two swallows don't make a summer. Likewise, two yellows don't do it either.
Now, one could argue that Arab Muslims and East Asians are both superior to blacks in IQ. After all, the Arab World and Asian World are far more advanced than black Africa and better-run than black-dominated cities like Detroit. But not every advantageous trait is 'iconic'. After all, people with superior engineering skills just do their jobs. They are not celebrated as stars or celebrities. Only a handful of uber-smart people like Einstein become well-known to the world. To appreciate science, technology, and most brainy professions, it takes time and patience. In contrast, it is immediately fun to listen to music, watch sports, get excited about sex, laugh at comedy, and rhapsodize about celebrity. Homos are creative with fashion and celebrity, Jews are funny & brilliant as comics, and blacks dominate pop music & sports, both of which are closely aligned with sex culture.
In some ways, Jews have both the easiest and most difficult task in maintaining their 'iconic' status. It's easy because they control media and academia; as such, they get to pick and choose what is holy and unholy. But, much of 'iconic' Jewish value reside in elite levels of achievement. Jews gained renown as writers, intellectuals, and scholars. Despite the high regard for Jewish Genius among the educated classes, most people don't care such things. For every person who read Philip Roth, a thousand people heard rap songs. Jews have been dominant in comedy, but as culture becomes dumber and trashier, future Woody Allens may not be properly appreciated. Worse, PC is doing to comedy what HIV did to homos, and this is bound to cut into Jewish wit. And as athletes and singers, Jews have been unable to compete with blacks. Also, someone of Bob Dylan's vision and genius isn't likely to be highly regarded in future America where the culture just keeps getting stupider. The key to Dylan's success was wit and brilliance because he wasn't a conventional song-and-dance man. But, in an idol-obsessed world, there is less space for eccentric artists like Dylan. And Shoah is too much of a downer. In contrast, homos have the wild-celebration thing that gets people all excited, and blacks got song, dong, and strong. Straights can join in the celebration of flamboyant homos, and non-blacks can enjoy blacks showing off on the sports field, but how can non-Jews really enjoy Jewishness?
Anyway, Asian yellow dogs are a confused lot. In a way, they are almost like closet-white-supremacists. In Japan, they have all these animation or 'anime' where characters tend to look Caucasian. Japanese cultural identity is a fantasy of wanting to be white. And, a New Yorker article reported that South Koreans are champions of plastic surgery. They go under the knife to emerge with white-looking eyes and noses. They go for trans-racial fantasies. And they dye their hand blonde and pretend to be pseudo-white-people. Also, Asians prefer whites as sexual mates and want to have white-looking babies. Granted, Asian women have advantage over Asian men in this department because, whereas Asian women have high sexual market value, Asian males have the lowest. Men of all races want to have sex with Asian women(who are seen as very feminine) but women of most races have no attraction to Asian men(who are deemed a bunch of dorks). And in dating sites, Asian women prefer white men over Asian men. And Asian male homos prefer non-Asian men to bugger their bungs. Notice how George Takei's yellow homo-bung is the plaything of some white guy. When Yukio Mishima visited New York, he looked for a blond homo, apparently to bugger his yellow bung.
Also, in terms of immigration patterns, Asians always prefer white-made or white-majority nations. Asian immigration preferences are for Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the US. Or Europe. Asians don't want to move to non-white-majority nations. In fact, Asians would rather move to a white-majority nation than to a fellow Asian nation. Asians feel that whites will treat them better and fairer than other Asians will treat them. So, everything that Asians DO would indicate a preference for whiteness. But to hide this shame(of favoring another race while devaluing their own), yellow dogs bark lots of anti-white noises. But if Asians really feel that way, why not avoid white people by staying in their own Asian nations? Why permanently relocate to white-majority nations? Why prefer white-made institutions over their own? Why take white names instead of keeping Asian names? Why not have Asian-looking babies than having white-looking babies? Why dye hair into blonde or brunette? Why have plastic surgery to look white? Asians bitch about past American policies that excluded Asians, but why were they so eager to flee from their own kind in the first place to live in a white-made and white-majority nations? Aren't Asian immigrants favoring whites over their own kind? Aren't they trying to 'include' more whites while 'excluding' fellow Asians in their own lives? After all, by coming to white-made nations, Asians become part of a white-majority world while excluding Asian Civilization from their daily lives. Such total lack of self-awareness. We should judge people by what they do than what they say. In terms of what Asians actually do, they seem to be closet-white-supremacists who want to live in white-majority nations, have white names, have sex with whites, and have white-looking babies. And it seems to be matter of Like Yellow Father Like Yellow Daughter. Asians see 'becoming white' as a journey of social, racial, and civilizational evolution, improvement, and ascendancy. Whether via plastic surgery or race-mixing, Asians feel no intrinsic value.
In the moral politics of PC, Asians suck up to Jews, blacks, and homos. As Evil Whitey is PC's main scapegoat, Asians join in on the Two Minutes of Hate against Whitey. But the fact is Asian immigrant-invaders moved to white nations because they favor whites over all other races, including their own. And despite their PC rhetoric, they try to settle in white areas and avoid brown and especially black areas. Based on what they really do than say, they are closet-white-supremacists. But then, so are Jews. For example, Jews revile 'racist' Nazi aesthetics of superior Aryan Beauty, but Jewish men have often longed for 'blonde white goddesses' while dumping Jewish women. Men like Woody Allen, Philip Roth, Norman Mailer, and Arthur Miller had quasi-Nazi taste in 'Aryan-looking' women as the epitome of beauty and desire. And brown hordes seem to be closet-white-supremacists too. They run from fellow browns and Diversity to make it to the US that is still perceived as a white country.
Anyway, Nimesh Patel the brown Asian was silenced by yellow dog Asians because he violated the PC decree of worshiping Blacks and Homos. Asians, being lame and conformist, seek to appease the Holy Three and are deathly afraid of displeasing them. Patel dared to crack jokes about homos and blacks, and that was simply a capital offense in the minds of conformist and sheep-like Asian grinds whose idea of humor is to serve the Power. (If these Asians really care about justice, why were they silent about Obama and Hillary's destruction of Libya and Syria? Why don't they protest Trump's anti-Iranian and anti-Palestinian policies? And why were they silent when Jewish Madeline Albright was killing 500,000 Iraqi kids?) They're really a bunch of phonies.
Be that as it may, in some ways, PC may be saving comedy.
Comedy reached its greatest heights as a subversive form of expression. Someone like Oscar Wilde would have been redundant and irrelevant in a permissive society. Best kind of humor always had to be risque. Lenny Bruce certainly got mileage of going against the system.
For a time, there was total freedom for comedians to be as outrageous as they wanted to be. The burst of freedom greeted as liberation and was fun for awhile but became pointless and tiresome because wanton vulgarity saturated everything and become just another mundane feature of life. People using F-words and discussing graphic sex became the New Normal, from elite-educated to the unwashed. The only way comedians could remain 'edgy' was by getting grosser and more putrid than the next guy. It was like a bunch of drunkards wallowing in their own vomit and urine.
But now, PC is once again creating a climate of repression and taboos, and that means real comedy can become risque again. But what is especially perverse is that PC considers itself to be edgy and subversive. After all, PC is the dogma of 'radicals' who take pride in their subversive attitude toward society. (Of course, the mindless dogs of PC, lacking agency and individuality like Mao's Red Guards, must be told by Central Command what to 'subvert' and attack. So, if Big Sister tells feminists to subvert the dead horse of 'patriarchy', you bet feminist dogs do just that and only that.) PC's delusional rationale for repressing free speech(now almost synonymous with 'hate speech') is to protect ‘radicalism' in a safe space. (It's as if 'radicalism' is now an infant that has to be babied and nursed. But then, we live in an infantile age.) It’s like a blade that has to be perpetually sheathed to keep it from blunting or breaking. But, this defeats the knife's purpose. A knife is designed to be a sharp instrument in order to cut. Then, cut it must despite the risk of tear-and-wear. The radicals once took pride in being edgy, but that edginess has been institutionalized. The blade has been placed as a sacred relic in the PC museum, and any weapon that dares to call on the knife to a knife-fight must be silenced & suppressed because the knife, having been consecrated as holy, no longer needs to prove itself. Everything institutionalized comes to be protected and preserved, shielded from further challenges. So, PC’s radicalism has become in name only. It is a protected blade that remains in the safety of the sheath. And the Power tells us there is no more needs for duels or knife-fights to see who or what is better because the 'debate is over', that's that, so you better shut up, and just learn to love PC and the Holy Three of Jews, blacks, and homos.
But this provides a new opportunity for comedians to subvert the Power. Political Correctness, in the name of protecting the 'weak', has come to protect the powerful. Once this state of affairs is exposed for what it really is, comedy comes alive again. We are living in a time when Jews, homos, and blacks wield immense power. Pretending that the Historical Clock stopped in the late 50s or early 60s is pure fantasy. Blacks today aren't like blacks back then. Jewish Power today isn't like what it was back then. And heaven knows homo privilege today isn't anything like homo reality back then. It's like the Chinese today aren't the coolies of yesteryear pulling rickshaws carrying white imperialists. Time passes, and things change. In a world where homos can destroy bakeries for refusing to bake a 'gay wedding cake', it is laughable to treat homos as some pitiful victim group. (What is the next frontier for 'marriage equality'? Same-Family or Incest Marriage?)
Remember the news of the execution of the Czar and his family in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO? The old man(played by Ralph Richardson) wonders why the Bolsheviks had to take such measure. Why kill the deposed man and his entire family? And Zhivago explains that the Bolsheviks did it send a clear message that ‘there is no going back’. Russia was then in the throes of the Civil War between the Reds and the Whites. Reds held the cities whereas Whites held the countryside. But the Reds had mass support as well since so many Russians had gotten tired of the disaster of WWI and expected more food and freedom from the Reds. To the masses, the Whites represented the Old World of privilege. Still, the Whites had considerable support among conservatives, clergy, traditionalists, and moderates who grew alarmed by Red violence.
Today, the globalists see the World in terms of a Grand Struggle. It is between Shlomo-Homo Globalism and Nationalism. Both sides have advantages and disadvantages.
Globalism’s power derives from the US, the lone super-power that is in neo-imperialist footing. As the US is controlled by Jews, globalism is essentially a Jewish project. Given globalism’s aggression and interference, many nations ought to be opposed to it, and indeed many are, and even many that are on-board have second thoughts about it.
Then, why does globalism seem so omnipotent around the world? One is bribery. As the US is the richest nation and controls world finance, it can offer bribes and sweet deals to elites around the world that comply with the globo-homo program. So, if the US promises sweet deals to nations that cave to homomania, they often do.
Also, even nations that cling to national sovereignty go along, at least halfway, with the globalist project since their wealth depends on global trade. China is a good example. China has a genuinely independent government(unlike Japan), but it relies on the globalist system of trade as devised by the US and EU. Also, despite all the problems of the US and EU, those parts of the world still have the best-managed, most innovative, and most productive economies. The problem of BRICS(Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nation is there is too much corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency among them.
Also, because the US media dominate world information and because US academia train so many elites of other nations, many elites become mental-colonized by globalist PC. Most elites around the world aren’t particularly bright or original. So, when they come to the US to study, they soak up all the dogma & cliches and repeat them like robots. Some do it sincerely, some do it opportunistically to belong to the globo-Elysium Club.
But globalism also has big weaknesses. Ironically, its great power is also its Achilles Heel. It is now so powerful and all-pervasive around the world that ‘globalism’ has negative connotations. Also, even in the metropole of globalism, there are many who feel that it isn’t good for the world or for most Americans. It’s only good for the elites and upper classes centered around few key cities. Also, there have been rising populist tensions in the EU. European Union began as a grand project for Europeans Only. But over time, globalism remade it into what is now effectively a European-African-Muslim Union. Globalism says that Europeans must welcome replacism by ‘New Europeans’ from the Third World. If a European nation wants to preserve its borders and identity, it is now demeaned as ‘far right’, ‘extreme’, and ‘white supremacist’ by globalism. Betrayal is the New Patriotism. Traitors are hailed as the New Patriots(or 'Patraitors'). Due to globo-shlomo-homo power, betrayal has become the central fact of the Modern World, not as vice but as virtue. What a twisted world we live in. Naturally, in order for Jews to have control over whites, whites must be encouraged to betray their own identity and interests in favor of obeying and serving Jews. The white race has become one Big Rat that squeals on white patriots in the delusion that race-betrayal(especially to appease Jews) is the highest virtue. While Jews practice omerta among themselves, whites have been conditioned to inform on other whites who won't get with the the globo-homo program.
Nevertheless, more and more people are waking up to the fact that globalism isn’t about all peoples around the world gaining equal recognition and value but all peoples coming under the same set of ‘values’ such as homomania and same narrow expressions of culture, such as rap music and Hollywood comic book franchise movies. Also, it's about all the world groveling at the feet of Jews(and homos).
Given all the problems of globalism and its elite-centrism, why would so many ordinary people support the globalist project? Among non-whites, there is ONE REASON: the chance to emigrate to richer white nations. If that option wasn't available, they would oppose globalism as a threat to their national sovereignty. But with the bait of immigration-to-the-West, non-white masses are more than willing to work with globalist elites to move to white nations, live off white wealth, and hump white women(or marry and have kids with white men). For sure, Muslims would have NO REASON to support globalism that is about Wars for Israel, spread of homomania, and US aggression. So, why do so many Muslims go along? Because they are obsessed with the dream of moving to the West. They know that Western Nationalists oppose immigration whereas Western globalists promote it. So, for material self-interest, they collaborate with globalists, even Zionist ones. And globalist elites know this. They know that mass support for globalism around the world will diminish UNLESS non-white masses can be enticed with the chance of moving to the West. That is why 95% of Muslims in France voted for Macron. They may hate Western policies against the Muslim World. They may despise Homomania. But the fact is Macron wants more immigration-invasion whereas LePen wants to slow it down or even end it.
Okay, we can now understand why Western/Jewish elites and non-white masses go with globalism. But why would white masses in white nations support globalism when it’s so anti-white? The fact that Macron got 65% of the vote means that he had majority support from whites as well. Also, 56% of young people voted for Macron. Why would so many white masses support globalism when it will demographically displace them? Why do so many whites choose to be 'patraitors' than patriots? Why do they think being a traitor is the 'new patriotism'? Well, many white masses were raised on PC education and Pop Culture. So, they’ve been made to sincerely believe that white identity and interests are evil. Also, Pop Culture has normalized Diversity, so that any idea of a White Europe or White Nation now seems wrong. The New Europe MUST BE Diverse. Also, the Western Left is based on virtue-signaling and feeling holier-than-thou. Due to dominance of PC, many white masses have been made to feel that the ONLY way they can feel morally justified and superior is by hugging Diversity and hating ‘white racism’. They've become addicted to the drug of self-righteous vanity. Today, even the desire of white nations to remain white is deemed ‘racist’.
Even white conservatives have been put on the moral defensive by PC’s diversity-mongering. So, the most that white conservatives can do is call for ‘civic nationalism’ and patriotic diversity. Morally disadvantaged, the Western Right can only play defense and can never be on the offensive. If indeed the consensus says Diversity is a wonderful thing, anyone who disagrees is automatically relegated to moral inferiority. Since even the Conservatives have chanted the mantra of ‘diversity is our strength’ over and over, they’ve fallen into a moral trap. If diversity is so good, how can they call for limits on immigration that stem the tide of wonderful diversity? Also, since the end of WWII, the reigning narrative has been that there is nothing worse than ‘white racism’. So, even white masses who are deeply anxious about Diversity feel morally unclean if they were to express their views. According to Official PC, any desire on the part of whites to maintain a white community is a ‘far right’ and ‘racist’.
Globalism is essentially a War between Jewish elites & their collaborator comprador elites AND white masses of traditional white nations. Jews have targeted such nations since bulk of Jewish wealth and power are concentrated there. Even though Jewish Power is a worldwide phenomenon, its nerve center is still in the West. Without that control of White Nations, Jewish power around the world in Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America would be shaky. So, Jewish control of the West is key to control of the Rest. And in order for Jews to control the West, whereupon Jewish-globalist interests must always trump white-nationalist-interests, the white folks of the West must be taught that THERE IS NO GOING BACK. Just like the Reds killed the Czar and his family to send a message to Whites that there is no going back, Jewish-Globalists want to send a demoralizing message to white nationalists/populists that there is no going back: White identity, white interests, and white power are OVER forever. Whites must serve Jews.
Now, one might argue that Jews could be dominant forces in the West purely on meritocracy without diversity. After all, following WWII, whites rejected antisemitism and became supportive of Jews, even aiding Zionists in the creation of Israel. And Jews gained rapid success in EU and especially in the US since the 60s, even gaining elite power. So, why would Jews need Diversity?
It’s because Jews fear that the Holocaust guilt-trip will eventually wear off. Jews fear that increasing Jewish power will lead to excessive corruption and abuses, and over time, whites will grow angry and become ‘antisemitic’ once again. The Saxon will learn to hate again. To prevent such, Jews need Diversity so that the divided and contentious bunch of gentiles won’t be able to unite against Jewish Power(no matter how arrogantly or abusively it behaves); due to chutzpah and the nature of Jewish personality, Jews know they can’t resist being overzealous in their power-grabbing and power-mongering; so, ‘antisemitism’ is most likely to return, indeed even for valid and justifiable reasons; so, if such a day were to come, the only way to secure Jewish Power is to have diverse goyim be so angry with one another that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish Domination.
Diversity is an effective way to weaken and destroy white identity politics. If masses of whites are taught from a young age that they must serve Diversity above all, it means whites must put white interests in the back-burner while favoring Diversity. Now, whites serving Diversity may not always align with whites serving Jewish interests. We see this with the BDS movement where some whites support Diversity(that of Palestinians) against Jewish-Zionist power. British Jews are furious that Jeremy Corbyn's base in the Labour Party sides with Palestinians against Zionism.
Nevertheless, Cult of Diversity means that whites must always put non-white interests before white interests, and that suppresses the chance of White Power, the only power that Jews fear as the potential challenge to Jewish domination in the West.
How does Russia factor into this? Russia was on the path toward being just another part of the Jewish Empire. A huge carcass for globo-weasels to feast on. Indeed, Jews came so very close. And if Jews had prevailed, their power would have been unbreakable. Just think. Jews control the US that controls the EU. Russia is a vast land mass with immense resources. If Jews gain control of that as well, they got it made forever. Also, control of Russia means control of Central Asia and part of the Middle East as “Russia’s sphere of influence”.
But Russia slipped out of Jewish grasp(just like the Rhine maidens from the clutches of Alberich in DAS RHEINGOLD).
To be sure, it’s still not game over. Russia still has powerful globalist-elements. And even though Putin rolled back globalists, he needs them to run much of the economy since they have the connections and knowledge. So, the future of Russia is, as yet, unsure. Still, there has been a revival of Russian nationalism that puts Russian identity and interests at the center of Russian politics. Also, Russian nationalism isn’t apologetic like the national politics of so many Western nations. I mean, why does Canada and Ireland have Black History Months when they had few blacks in their nations? Afromania, like Homomania, is a cultural imperialist tool of the Jews. Jews are trying to make ALL WHITE NATIONS celebrate Diversity over National Identity and Degeneracy over Decency as the New Normal of Morality. Canada and Ireland have become just tools of Zionist-US empire.
But Russia won’t be having ‘gay pride month’ and ‘black history month’ anytime soon. While Russia isn’t overtly racial in its nationalism, it does have a proud and unapologetic sense of national pride and heritage. Russians don’t believe that Russians exist primarily to serve non-Russians, which is in contrast to the Western PC Ideal that whites exist mainly to serve non-whites: White lands exist to take in tons of non-white immigrants. White wombs exist to make black babies. White minds exist to serve globalism. White soldiers exist to fight Wars for Israel. White Death exists to make room for non-white bodies and make profits for Big Pharma run by Jews who peddle opioids to the millions.
In the Global-Civil-War, Russia still resists the Zio-Globalist hegemony of US and its vassal entity of the EU. What Jews fear most is that the Russian Example may spread and inspire other white nations to put national interest at the center of their ideology, politics, culture, and conviction. It will mean each native population of European nations putting their own people, culture, and land above others. If white gentiles begin to feel this way, they may not only push out the Muslims and Africans… but may come to see Jewish elites in their midst as outsiders also.
Most importantly, the die has already been cast to the point where it’s difficult for Jews to reverse their position. Jewish globalists have thrown their lot so much on the side of globalism and cult of Diversity that it’s now a game of WIN or LOSE. Sometimes, when you go ALL IN, you can no longer moderate your position. It becomes a zero-sum game of Win All or Lose All.
It’s like Hitler could moderate his relations with Stalin prior to Operation Barbarossa. It was an uneasy alliance between Germany and USSR, but there was peace and things could be worked out by compromise based on mutual respect and recognition of the other’s legitimacy. But once Hitler went all in and invaded Russia in June of 1941, it was WIN or LOSE. The die was cast.
There was a time when Jews had been more cautious, gently pushing for diversity but also being mindful of white national concerns. But over time, Jews decided to throw caution to the winds and go whole hog in their War on White or WOW. Jews have gone Full Tim Wise. It was perfectly encapsulated by the Newsweek cover of the Obama Conquest over the White Race.
The Jewish-Supremacist Message to the White Race: "We out-hustled you and used mass-immigration-invasion and Diversity to destroy White Power and Prestige forever." When Jews spit on whites with such contempt, it is truly amazing that so many whites, including conservatives, suck up to Jews.
So, all this stuff about Russia-collusion and Russia-hacking is baloney. Jews don’t believe in any of it. So, why are they peddling such nonsense? It’s all part of the Global-vs-National War in which Jews see Russia as the most dangerous model of white national sovereignty. And Brexit and election of Trump got Jews very worried.
Now, why should Jews worry about the rise of nationalism when Jews are doing just fine in Russia-gone-nationalist? After all, even though Jews are a small minority in Russia, they are better-off than all other groups and still control up to 20% of its wealth. So why? It's because Jews want supremacism, not just privilege and wealth. Jews feel that ONLY SUPREMACISM can guarantee Jewish power and wealth forever. After all, Russia is a nation where Jewish power and wealth can be taken away if indeed Putin decided to throw in his lot with ultra-nationalists with anti-Jewish bent. So, Jewish riches in Russia depend on the magnanimity and Machiavellian caution of Putin(who fears repercussions of Jewish globalist power if he were to move against Jews). The fact that Putin was able to bring down Khodorovsky means that, theoretically at least, he can bring down any Jewish oligarch who gets too out of hand. So, rich Jews in Russia feel more vulnerable than the rich Jews in the US who are protected by the entire network of power from Wall Street to legal courts to Deep State. Jews have Putin-like power x 1000 in the US. They are untouchable. Even with the election of a nationalist-populist president, Trump has been hemmed in on all sides by Jewish power and its Deep State agents.
But Trump is a savvy and unpredictable player, and there’s no telling what he might really do. He’s not like the pliable puppet that Rubio or Jeb Bush would have been. Trump likes to play the role of Lord of Chaos, and Jews fear that he may have some cards up his sleeve.
Anyway, if Trump comes to an understanding with Russia and forges good ties, it means NATO will weaken. And that means America's control over EU will weaken as well, as NATO will be perceived as obsolete and irrelevant. Decreased US hegemony over EU could mean the breakup of EU or the rise of nationalism in the absence of US domination(in service of the Empire of Judea or EOJ). And then, the globalist project may be threatened with the emergence of politics that are more nation-centric. When people of a nation put nationalist interest above globalist interest, it means they will favor native majority interest over minority interests such as those of Jews whose world power is really more reliant on global networking than national roots and foundations.
This is what all this Russia Stuff is about. No Jew believes in all this stuff about hacking or collusion. The Jewish-controlled Mass Media just keep putting it out there so as to vilify Russia. If Russia is cast as the Grand Villain, it will be difficult for Trump to do anything constructive in improving relations. He will be denounced as COLLUDING with the Enemy. So, this hysteria is not about what Trump or Russia might or might not have done. It’s about preventing what they MIGHT DO as friendly nations. It is to rig the game so that US cannot have friendly ties with Russia.
But then, this trick should be familiar to the American Right that used to castigate ANY attempt by Democrats toward friendlier ties with the USSR as ‘going easy on communism’. And when Reagan finally decided to work for peace with Gorbachev, there were plenty of Cold Warriors who did everything to derail the effort by accusing Reagan of being senile, weak, or stupid in trusting the Evil Empire.
It’s like what James-Wood-as-Haldeman says in Oliver Stone's NIXON.
EHRLICHMAN:
Excuse me … Are you talking about
recognizing China, Mr. President?
That would cost us our strongest
support.
NIXON:
No … I can do this because I’ve
spent my whole career building anti
Communist credentials.
HALDEMAN: If Johnson or Kennedy tried it, they’d have crucified them, and rightfully so! MITCHELL:
It’s damned risky, Mr. President. Why
don’t we wait till the second term?
Anyway, Jews are looking for the KILL-THE-CZAR moment with Trump to send the message that There Is No Going Back. They want to do something so powerful and shocking so that there is no chance of Trump working with Russia on a friendly basis and changing the status quo of hostility. As Jewish Power put all the eggs in the globalist basket, any chance that Russian nationalism might inspire other nationalism in white nations is an alarming development to Jews(and homos who value globalism as a missionary vehicle for Homomania).
Now, there are times when Jews will support little nationalism against Big Nationalism. So, Jews supported Ukrainian nationalism against Russia, indeed even going so far as to work with Neo-Nazi elements. Though Jews hate Ukrainian nationalism too, they see it as useful for the time being against the more challenging Russian one. Also, whereas Russian nationalism is self-sufficient, Jews know that Ukrainian nationalism would collapse without US-EU support as there is no meaningful internal unity or core identity among Ukrainians. Of course, to mask the far-right characteristics of Ukrainian Nationalism, Jews urged the new government to put on a homo parade there so as to sell US involvement in Ukraine as Project-Tolerance. Today's progs will support any war if the bombs are painted in Homo Colors.
