Tyler Cowen Is Full of Beans in Claiming ‘Same-Sex Marriage’ Had No Deleterious Impact on Larger Society - In Fact, Homomania Canonized Lies as the New Truth

Tyler Cowen, whose future vision for most Americans is to consume more beans, is full of hot air when it comes to the ‘gay rights’ and its larger impact on society. In an interview with Camille Paglia, Tyler, the Harvey-Weinstein-minus-the-gonads-look-alike-fool, smugly remarked that, you see, the world didn’t come to end and the sky didn’t fall because ‘gay marriage’ became the Law of the Land. So, the LGBTQ revolution was no big deal. There was nothing to be worried about. It was just about homosexuals getting their due ‘gay rights’ and becoming like the rest of us. Society just ‘evolved’ by accepting homosexuals as people just like you and me. And even now, whether its Cowen, Steven Pinker, and Jonathan Haidt, we keep hearing the term ‘gay rights’ when it comes to the issue of this phenomenon called the LGBT(Q) movement. This is fundamentally false for several reasons. The fact is homos got their ‘gay rights’ ages ago. Except for some localities, most of America came to accept homosexuals for what they are and even came to tolerate trannies. Following the social and cultural transformations of the 1960s, most homosexuals had full rights as individuals and could work at just about any job. Also, in some many elite industries, homosexuals were not only well-represented but favored, not least among themselves, just like many industries that came to be dominated by Jews went out of their way to favor Jews over others despite the fact that discrimination against Jews was a thing of the past. The Jewish-dominated media created the impression that homos were still oppressed and persecuted all over America by favoring certain narratives. So, if there was a case where a homosexual got attacked by local thugs, it made the national news. But the media covered up stories of homosexual degeneracy and bad behavior.

The media have the power to mold mass perceptions. Consider the media blackout on the instances of black thugs playing knockout games against whites or non-blacks. Despite the problem, the media turned a blind eye, and many Americans didn’t know about it unless they looked to alternative news sources on the internet. However, when some blacks pulled knockout games on some Jews in NY, it was suddenly newsworthy. The Jew-run media obviously deems Jewish lives more worthy.
Or consider the whole Trayvon Martin affair. There are so many cases of blacks acting aggressive and brutalizing members of other races, but the national media pay almost no attention to this problem. It makes the local news and then sinks into a memory hole.

Colin Flaherty had a Youtube Channel in which he gathered up various local news about bad black behavior and thus made it available to the worldwide audience. But the Jews who run Youtube shut down his channel because it went against the Narrative. Jewish power relies on white submissivism to Jews, and the only way to ensure such servility is to paralyze whites with ‘white guilt’. Since white Americans had nothing to do with the Shoah, the guilt-bait that Jews use on white Americans is about black slavery and ‘Jim Crow’. The Jewish Narratives says blacks were these noble, wonderful, and wise people who were greatly wronged by white people for no reason. So, anything that whites did in the past to secure their well-being against blacks was ‘irrational’, ‘unjustifiable’, and ‘evil’. So, if whites are made to feel that they’d mistreated a people who are so very good and noble, they are bound to feel extra-guilty. Thus burdened with ‘white guilt’, whites feel paralyzed in terms of pride of identity. Their only redemption, then, is to serve other peoples... such as Jews and whatever groups Jews find particularly useful at the moment. And that is why Colin Flaherty was banned from Youtube. His videos and narration drove home the point that there is something innately dangerous about blacks, and therefore, whites in both past and present often had valid reasons for fearing and loathing blacks. 'Racism' wasn't just this irrational fear of skin color but a response to blacks being more violent and tougher because they evolved in Africa. Flaherty's truth was too power for Jews who run youtube.

But when it comes to whites spewing vitriol against Muslims, Jews are far more forgiving because Jews need white warriors against the Arab/Muslim/Persian enemies of Zionism. So, if Colin Flaherty had made anti-Muslim videos highlighting how cruel, barbaric, and murderous Muslims are(especially in Muslim nations as Jews do have use for American Muslims as wonderful immigrant allies against White America), he would still have his Youtube channel as does Pat Condell, most of whose shtick is to attack Muslims as the source of 99% of all the problems in the world. Condell is apparently in good graces with ADL, the Zionist-supremacist organization, that partners up with Facebook, Google, and Twitter to decide who should or shouldn’t be terminated.

Anyway, the media can make a mountain out of a molehill and make a molehill out of a mountain. The media can look at something small with a convex lens to make it loom large OR look at something large through a concave lens and make it shrink small. Via ‘convexing’ or ‘concaving’, the Jewish-run media can play all sorts of tricks to mess with collective perceptions of reality. When it came to the horrors of the AIDS epidemic unleashed by the homosexual community, the Jew-run media downplayed the role of degeneracy among homos. Instead, the usual narrative was that homos were angelic victims struck down by some mysterious ailment when, in fact, virtually all of them contracted the disease by out-of-control ‘bunging’. Rather than give us the hard facts, the media and entertainment gave us stuff like the Tom Hanks movie PHILADELPHIA that would have us believe that a homo guy, who is more normal-than-normal, got the disease almost accidentally and unknowingly. To further drive home the point of angelic homo victim-hood, he partners up with a black guy. And we are to believe in that in a big Liberal city in the 1990s, no law firm will take a legal case of a homosexual. (Few years ago, when the ‘gay marriage’ issue made it to the Supreme Court, the side opposing 'gay marriage' could not get representation from any big law firm. And Richard Spencer, up to his neck in frivolous lawsuits from Charlotesville's Jews and cretins, can’t find a single lawyer to defend him. And Christian bakers who are driven out of business and hit with huge fines for refusing to bake perversion cakes for ‘gay weddings’ have a difficult time getting legal representation. But in the Jew-run universe of media and entertainment, we are to believe that it’s the beleaguered homosexual in a big city who can’t find anyone to represent him against a big corporation and had to settle for some cynical black guy who, in time, learns to revere the homosexual guy as some angelic figure. "Sheeeiiiit, homos be even holier than us niggaz.") But then, the Jew-run media had us believing forever that Israeli Jews are under threat from crazy Palestinians when, in fact, it’s the Palestinians who’ve been oppressed and brutalized by Israelis ever since Jewish Zionists decided to murder the nation of Palestine and build Israel over its grave. The motto, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you" is so apt when it comes to so many crises around the world. The Jew-run US is the aggressor against much-diminished Russia, but Americans are told that Putin is ‘new hitler’ and Russia meddled in US elections. (If anything, the US has been meddling in Russian politics since the 1990s when Jews financially raped that whole nation.) Jews use American Power to rip apart Muslim nations like Libya and Syria, but we are to believe that good ole Americans were just acting in defense of 'human rights' to protect innocent people from evil tyrants. And even though Iran hasn’t invaded anybody forever whereas Israel has invaded its neighbors so many times, the power of Jewish money and influence forces every politician and newsperson to carry on as if the Israel and maybe the US are facing an ‘existential’ threat from Iran.

Anyway, when Jews like Cowen, Haidt, and Pinker refer to the homo agenda as ‘gay rights’, they are just playing mind-tricks with us. They must know that ‘gay rights’ was a thing long time ago. What we’ve had since the 1990s was the rise of Homomania, Queertianity, or Gay Rites. Jews having used the power of media and entertainment to turn homosexuality into a holy icon. Jews want Americans to abandon Christianity and traditional symbols & values and surrender to the bacchanalian quasi-spirituality of Homomania. It’s like worship and festivity all rolled into one, like the Mardis Gras in New Orleans turned into a neo-religious event. But then, these very same Jews transformed gambling from a vice to a new kind of ‘virtue’ that even corrects historic wrongs by tossing some shekels at American Indians in reservations. (Now, why didn’t the Germans and Poles think of that? Why not run casinos in former Nazi camps? And run some in Ukraine to in honor of the victims of Stalin. And then, the owners and operators can rake it in big time while tossing some shekels at the ‘survivors’ and their descendants to prove that it’s all for a good cause.) Steven Pinker is deeply anti-religious and takes pride in his thoroughgoing atheism... but he seems to be utterly blind to the fact that Homomania is the new defacto religion of America. Since homos, as yet, don’t have their own temples in honor of the holy bunghole, they’ve decided to take over Christian churches and drape them with homo colors, easily done since most Mainline churches are run by deracinated and decadent lesbians or oddballs and because Baptist churches are mostly run by hucksters looking for easy bucks from Zionist oligarchs by turning their churches into centers of hatred against Palestinians and Iranians. It’s hardly an exaggeration to say that Evangelical Christianity in America is 70% about ‘Muh Israel’ and "Let’s drop some more bombs on those subhuman ‘muzzies’", which is amusing because American Jews despise white Evangelicals more than any other group, yes even more than Muslims. But that’s Amerika in a nutshell. Jews despise and spit on a group that reveres and serves them the most, and Evangelicals weep and pray for the group that reviles and abuses them the most. Is it any wonder why one group has so much more power over the other?

Pinker claims to be atheist, but he’s apparently okay with the neo-religion of Homomania enforcing taboos just as a religion does. But then, where does one start with the lies of the homo agenda? First, the very idea of using ‘gay’ to denote ‘homosexuality’ is a perversion of language. ‘Gay’ meant happy, blissful, giddy, light-hearted, and/or debonair. Even if gay qualities are more pronounced among homos than straight people, there are homos who aren’t gay in style and manners, and there are straight people with gay qualities. And yet, homos claimed the whole term for themselves, and then the adjective was turn into a noun, as in ‘gays’ meaning a bunch of homo guys. Imagine blacks owning ‘fast’ to mean ‘black’ because blacks generally run faster than other races. Imagine Asians owning ‘studious’ because they tend to study harder than other races. But the lunacy didn’t end with ‘gay’. Recently, with full support of Jew-run media and Jew-run advertising — it’s hard to tell which is which anymore — , the ‘gays’ decided to own ‘pride’ too. ‘Gay pride’ sounded ridiculous enough because, after all, where is the pride in homo fecal penetration and men sucking each other’s penises? Worse, with LGBT(Q) combining ‘gays’ and trannies into one single combo-meal identity, ‘pride’ is also supposed to apply to men who put on wigs, wear dresses, pump themselves with artificial hormones, and even have their genitals mutilated to be altered into fake genitals of the opposite sex. As if that wasn’t enough, homos decided that their symbol should be all the colors. Yes, 2% or 3% of LGBT(Q) folks should lay claim to the entire color spectrum. And then, homo-ness should be ass-ociated with things that have no relation to homosexuality. So, we are supposed to buy homo-colored Oreo cookies. Now, why would anyone want to associate cookie-eating with homos buggering one another or with trannies going to doctors to have their genitals mutilated?

Whatever one may say about feminists into Pro-Abortion activism, their cause isn’t associated with cookies and drinks. After all, who wants to think of a fetus being turned into spaghetti sauce while one’s eating spaghetti? But homos, with full support of Jewish advertising firms, have decided all sorts of food items and beverages should be ‘homosherized’, the homo equivalent of koshering even foods mostly bought and consumed by non-Jews. (Perhaps, there is something a bit ‘gay’ about oreo cookies, at least when homos eat it. Maybe homos see the white cream between two black cookies as akin to sperm with feces up the bunghole.) Why must most food be koshered when most Americans are not Jewish? Why must so many food products by ‘homoshered’ even though most Americans aren’t homo? Evidently, Jews promoted homos because they want to normalize for all Americans the sense that the great majority must favor and serve the minority elites. Since both Jews and homos constitute minority elites, their powers are complementary. It’s like the Jewish and Homo alliance in the Coen Brothers’ HAIL CAESAR. Jews are wizards of profits and prophecy. Homos are wizards of creativity and visionary prowess. Jewish prophets profit from Homo visionary vanity. Since the masses want to stare up at icons and idols than gaze at humdrum humanity, Jews need their homos who have an exquisite eye for details in creating iconic figures and images. That aspect of creativity is one thing homos can lay special, though hardly unique, claim to because a disproportionately higher percentage of homos have that keen eye and touch than straight people do. It’s hardly surprising that the homo revolution was top-down than the other way around since it was the rich, privileged, and vain who could most afford the services of the whoopity-doopers. Still, most homosexuals aren’t that creative, and even the ones that are tend to favor shallow vapid expression than anything with depth. If anything, homosexual creativity was much more substantive in the past because, having to remain in the closet, homos channeled their creative energies to explore and represent things of deeper or higher value. But once society turned libertine and allowed homos to indulge totally in their own vanity, homo creativity has gone mostly into self-indulgence in fashion and kitschy pageantry. Most of homo expression today is self-parody.

Anyway, to further elevate Homomania into a neo-religion, the Jewish-run media and heavily Jewish-influenced mass education spread the notion of ‘homophobia’. It was a total misuse of the term phobia that really means extremely fearful and panicked reaction to something harmless. A man who freaks out over a small white mouse could be said to have a phobia. But ‘homophobia’ could mean anyone who found homo fecal penetration gross, opposed ‘gay marriage’ as insane and immoral, or cracked a joke about homos. Imagine that. Finding homos to be amusing in a ridiculous way is ‘phobic’. Using this logic, Polack Jokes would be ‘Polophobic’. Jokes about fat people would be ‘fatophobic’. Jokes about short people would ‘shortophobic’.
Now, some may argue that terms like ‘homophobia’ and ‘xenophobia’ aren’t to be taken at face value. They should just mean something like strong animus or opposition to a cause, culture, or movement. But this is disingenuous because designating someone as ‘phobic’ means something far more than anti- or counter-. It implies he is clinically sick in the head, totally irrational, or completely delusional. After all, if ‘phobic’ just means anti- or counter-, why isn’t the open borders crowd not referred to as ‘border-phobic’? Why aren’t feminists called ‘man-phobic’? The term ‘phobic’ is inherently judgmental, so when a people are called ‘homophobic’, it means they are sick, demented, or evil.

But because Jews gained monopoly over the terminology and have control over all media and platforms, they get to invent terms — indeed, ‘homophobia’ was invented by some Jew — and enforce their usage on all of us through schools and news. Considering that men like Steven Pinker, Jonathan Haidt, and Tyler Cowen flatter themselves as free-thinking intellectuals free of PC mental prison, you’d think they would expose the corruption of language in the current political, cultural, and ideological debate, but they just play along with the Jewish-invented terminology. Why? Because despite their liberal, libertarian, or secular credentials, they must feel something deep inside that is powerfully tribal?

Anyway, even a cursory examination of the homo agenda in its unholy alliance with Jewish power makes it obvious that so much of morality, culture, and intellectual discourse had to be compromised and corrupted in order to push the agenda through. There was no way Homomania could go beyond ‘gay rights’ into the ‘promised land’ of Gay Rites unless the American elites were bullied into compliance and the American masses were duped into Summer-of-Homo kumbaya. Secular Liberals generally love to point out how stupidly misinformed the American public is, but they don’t seem bothered by the fact that Americans believe that 25% of Americans are homosexual based on Jewish media saturation of homo characters and themes. Intellectual Jews who love to bemoan the dire state of American education are more than happy to keep most Americans ignorant and misled about issues and matters IF their ignorance is a boon to Jewish power. On occasion, some Jews do lash out at the utterly stupid ignorance of American gentiles who’d for so long been browbeaten into not noticing Jewish Power. It’s getting embarrassing for both Jews and gentiles. I mean, how are Jews supposed to keep insisting that they don’t control Hollywood? And how are gentiles supposed to be respected by Jews when they are dumb enough to fall for the ADL and Ben Shapiro’s line that Hollywood is not run by Zionists but by a bunch of ‘leftists’ who hate Israel. I’ll believe it when Hollywood begins to make a spate of movies about the nobility of Palestinians? Indeed, how about Jews make a BLACK-PANTHER-like movie for Palestinians that imagines the existence of a super-technological Palestine that might have existed IF Jews hadn’t come barging in to steal the land? Joel Stein couldn’t take it any more on the issue of who really controls Hollywood. Enforced ignorance and willful naivete makes either a**holes or idiots out of all of us.

In a way, the West is suffering from the Knowledge Paradox of Jews. In many ways, it’s true that Jews are more educated, more knowledgeable, and better informed than most other groups. They are closer to the news, they read and write more books, they earn more Ph.D’s, and they are more curious about what’s happening around the world. So, naturally, Jews are frustrated with so many gentiles who aren’t well-educated, curious, inquisitive, intellectual, and knowledgeable about world affairs. On one level, Jews do want gentiles to be smarter & more engaged and less ignorant & dumb. They do want to raise the intellectual and information bar higher for gentiles who tend to be less intelligent, intellectual, and informed than Jews. But Jews also love their power and privilege. They also know that not all of Jewish money and influence were gained honestly, morally, or meritocratically. Jews also want to expand their power and wealth even more, and that means they will have to keep bamboozling the goyim.
Now, the climate change controversy may indeed have merit as something we should all worry about, BUT it’s also obvious that Wall Street Jews are hyping it to build another massive tech bubble, this time in green energy. The plan is they’ll put in the money in IPO’s and then watch their stocks grow sky high as sucker gentile money pours in, and then they will pull out their great gains just before the big crash. So, Jews get in first and get out first.
Also, Jews know full well that Diversity will be awful for white gentiles in the US and EU. This is so patently obvious to anyone with eyes. Then, why do Jews want white gentiles to be so ignorant and brainwashed on the issue? It’s because Jews want to secure their supremacist power permanently by destroying white majority power in the West. As rising Diversity will pit gentiles vs gentiles — just consider the likes of Pat Condell bickering endlessly with Muslims — , Jews will get to play divide-and-rule. And even if whites do discover that Jews had pulled a dirty one on them, it will be too late for them to do anything about it. If all of America were like California, then resurgence of white power through elections would be impossible. Jews on top will just play the various gentile groups against one another.

This is why we see the funny phenomenon of Jews berating white people(especially conservatives) for being so ignorant and dumb but then flip out when white people finally do some research and figure out who really has the power. Whatever one thinks of Paul Nehlen, he did some independent research and realized which people have the most power in America and what they are doing with this power against White America. But Jews hate him even more than they hate dumb ignorant ‘white trash’ who voted for Trump and support Israel. So, there’s the paradox of Jews wanting whites to be smarter but freaking out when whites actually use their brains to figure out what’s really going on. Jews have long prided themselves in being independent thinkers who go against the grain of institutional power or official narrative. And Jews act as though they want to inspire the rest of us to be likewise, but when gentiles do follow in the path of the ‘culture of critique’ and learn to see the real power and devise ways to analyze this power, Jews throw a fit and try to shut them down like they shut down the free speech rally in Charlottesville.

Indeed, Jews with god-complex now see us as God saw Adam and Eve. God wanted Adam and Eve to know stuff, but He didn’t want them to eat from the Tree of Knowledge lest they gain the secret of God’s power. So, when they dared to eat the fruits, they were violently exiled and denied the amenities of the Garden. Charlottesville was like the Garden of Eden story. The Alt Right dared to eat the forbidden fruit of the Tree of Power. Having eaten the forbidden fruit, the Alt Right was willing to spill the beans on what the real Power is like in the US. Jews-as-god simply couldn’t allow such knowledge and truth to be known to the people. So, just like God destroyed the Garden and made life difficult for Adam and Eve, the Jewish Power in the US used the police and antifa goons to attack and disperse the Alt Right patriots and White National Liberationists. And just like Adam and Eve found the new reality hostile and forbidding without the old amenities, many on the Alt Right have been fired from jobs, denied service, banned from platforms, and etc.

Jews fear the new language of the Alt Right. They don’t want anyone to hear it, so the Jewish media mendaciously distort the message of White National Emancipators. Just like God destroyed Babel and scattered people all over, Jewish power seeks to smash and destroy the rising tower of white consciousness and unity. Jews also know that people can speak the same language but still not understand one another since they favor different terminologies — pro-life vs pro-choice — and work from different premises. So, two groups could speak the exact same language and comprehend each other but still not understand the other side that seems so ‘evil’. So, there is more to English than English. Because Jews control most of media, academia, and government, to come under the influence of English in the modern world is to come under the sway of Jews. English is now essentially Zionglish. (And what blacks speak in rap is essentially ‘nigglish’.) Jews would have all of us learn and speak Zionglish and think as Jews want us to. We don’t have to learn a special language apart from English to use Zionglish. Knowing English is sufficient for us to fall under the spell of Zionglish, the power of which draws from the (1) narrative premise (2) terminology in how certain terms are defined and in how new terms are created (3) the icons of images and sounds that are associated with certain terms or narratives.
For example, by rules of Zionglish, the narrative premise of the Modern West is ‘white guilt’ derived from the history of white evils of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and whatnot. A term like ‘gay’ is defined to mean homosexual, thereby impressing upon us the notion that homosexuality is defined more by style than the gross fact of homo fecal penetration. And a term like ‘racism’ is defined as ‘supremacist hatred for other races, especially black’, when in fact, ‘ism’ should just mean belief in something. Also, via the power of electronic media, Jews associate certain ideas, attitudes, and stories with certain images, sounds, and sensations. So, white power is associated with KKK and Holocaust. Black history is seen totally in terms of saintly black victimhood, like the incident at Selma. And even though most black slaves were not beaten 24/7, the iconic image of the slave experience is some black man with badly scarred back. And the narrative of Jim Crow Era is linked with images of lynched blacks even though, in a span of a century, not all that many blacks were lynched. So, that’s how Zionglish works. All you need to know is English but just learn to read, listen, think, and speak as the Jewish media and academia want you to do.

In contrast, Alt Right rejects Zionglish and puts forth a new way to use English. It rejects the terms pushed on white folks by Jews. Alt Right rejects the the simple-minded narratives that, though not entirely false, are rigged to protect and favor Jewish power and privilege. And Alt Right white national autonomists have their own storage of images, sounds, and memes that they want to share to counter the Mono-Narrative pushed by Zionglish.
After all, when Jews talk about Diversity, they don’t mean they care about diversity of views. They just mean diverse races and peoples should all submit to the power of Zionglish that pervades all the global media, academia, and politics. This is why Jews fear true intellectualism, independence of mind, and critical spirit among gentiles. There’s too high a chance that gentiles who learn to see, think, and speak on their own will NOT think like Jews. Sigmund Freud tried to use Carl Jung as a student and follower, but Jung had his own will and agency. He didn’t feel like cowering to anyone. So, we are stuck in a strange world where Jewish elites encourage us to learn more and think more but also tell us what to see, what to think, and what to say. Jews want to make us believe that we, of our own volition, have arrived at the same conclusions as the Jews, but if we were truly free to see, think, and speak, then the chances are we will arrive at different conclusions, all the more so since Jews don’t really believe what they say.
Indeed, there are two Jewish conclusions: the official and the esoteric. So, to the rest of us dummies, Jews will tell us such-and-such as the official conclusion. But among themselves, they have their own modes and codes to, wink wink, send signals that are not supposed to be picked up by us. So, when Jews say, ‘diversity is our strength’, it has two conclusions. The official one would have all of us believe that diversity will indeed enrich and empower each and everyone of us. In contrast, the esoteric conclusion among Jews is, wink wink, "It’s good for the Jews because a gentile house divided unto itself cannot challenge our power."
Diversity babelizes. It not only sets whites against non-whites but sets whites against whites as some whites will remain skeptical of the cult of diversity while others will drink the whole kool aid. Diversity also sets non-whites against their own kind. Muslims who choose to assimilate to trashy Western Pop culture will feel alienated from Muslims who choose to remain true to the faith.
In the globalist order, if all the many diverse peoples are to have one thing in common, it is Zionglish, the usage of which instills in every goyim that the holy three of life are Jews, Homos, and Negroes. Holocaustianity, Homomania, and Rap.

Anyway, just how did the LGBT(Q) movement prove to be especially damaging to the modern world? Why is Cowen so wrong in claiming that the world just went on as usual, and everything is back to normal... except for the fact that homos can ‘marry’?

What LGBTQ-ism did to American society, in which PC had already made it dangerous to speak the truth, was to institutionalize the telling of lies on a grand scale. If, prior to LGBTQ-ism, the thing was to keep your mouth shut and not utter obvious truths(such as relation between blacks and crime) that might offend certain sensibilities, the new norm with LGBTQ-ism was to boldly and brazenly expound the lie not only as the 'truth' but the holy sacrament to which we must all bow down.

Lies aren’t good but a part of everyday life. We all tell lies, little ones and big ones. Sometimes, people tell white lies to be diplomatic. Sometimes, people tell lies to save their own necks for reasons that may be justifiable or not. But we still know, deep down inside, that lies are lies. No one should be proud of telling lies. And we have rule-based means by which to distinguish truth from lies. So, when Jayson Blair of the New York Times was exposed as having written a bunch of false stories, he was reprimanded and fired despite the Times being a ‘liberal’ paper that supposedly feels sympathy for blacks. After all, the world would be scary indeed IF we were told that reality is whatever anyone claims it to be. So, if journalists make up stuff and call it trans-reality and if all of us are compelled to accept such lies as truth, what are to make of real reality and false reality? This was the problem of communist nations where the people were supposed to believe the official narrative no matter how ludicrous it was and had no relation to the reality that the people could see all around. Lies are lies, and they will always be around us like flies. We have to tolerate them, but we must never mistake them for truth.

This is why the institutional protection and promotion of lies as the ‘truth’ is so dangerous, indeed downright cancerous. It means society no longer has the integrity, courage, and resolve to expose and expunge lies and falsehood to defend and uphold the truth. It means there is now a Power that can arbitrarily decide what is ‘true’ and what is ‘false’; and the debate is OVER-AND-DONE-WITH and you better just shut up, follow along, and sound off when called upon.

Nothing, not even the much corrupted black politics, promoted and spread lies as spectacularly as LGBTQ-ism did. According to its loopy logic and fanciful narrative, homos were merely blameless saintly victims of HIV epidemic. We straight people should blame ourselves for not having sufficiently cared for the homos who were buggering one another in bathhouses. (If memory serves us right, whenever homos were given warning and advice on the riskiness of their behavior, their main attitude was mocking laughter or the middle finger. But then, how can we judge a holy people for anything? Even when they do wrong, they are holy, and that means they’re blessed, and since they’re blessed, the blame must fall on us, not them, for not having done more for such a blessed people. But now, some of you will say, "But we did warn them, but they did it anyway and brought it upon themselves." Ahhh, but such attitude is mistaken because it assumes that homos should act according to our sense of reality and responsibility. Since homos are holy and blessed, they should be able to do whatever they please in their own ‘reality’ and revelry. So, if whatever they love doing to each other leads to problems, then it is incumbent upon us, not them, to find the cures and solutions so that they can do as they please and not suffer the consequences. It is the ‘right’ of a holy people to do as they please and not suffer the consequences. To fully such a ‘right’ for a holy people, it is up to us to toil and sweat to come up with The Solution. So, if homos want to bugger one another all over and all the time, it won’t do for us to admonish them and warn how such behavior can do great harm. They must be free to indulge in such behavior because they are holy and, as such, anything they do is blessed. What we must do is try to come up with a cure for all diseases related to homo behavior. That way, homos can bugger a 100 bungs a night and not catch some dreaded disease. That is true progress.) By the logic of LGBT-ism, we are to believe that homo man’s anus, the fecal organ, is a sex organ. We are supposed to say, yep, a bunghole really is, just like a vagina. And ‘two daddies’ or ‘two mommies’ are just as biologically and morally feasible as two real parents of mom and dad.
After all, some homos are rich while many straights are poor, and that means money and privilege are the final arbiters of worth and meaning.
So, the biological and social facts of homosexuality are just as legit for matrimony as the bio-moral basis between man and woman. And if you disagree, you are suffering from a ‘phobia’, or ‘homophobia’. Furthermore, if you entertain funny thoughts about homos or trannies in your head, you must also be irrationally fearful of homosexuality. Yes, homosexuality is so wonderful that entire city blocks must be shut down for massive parades with ‘rainbow’ colors. Most of history must be disregarded as oppressive, backward, and less ‘evolved’ because civilizations around the world never thought to associate homo fecal penetration with rainbow colors and find the highest meaning in hysterical celebration of marching fruitkins and tootkins. Why stop there? Golly gee, homos are so angelic and saintly that every church should be pressed upon to get with the program and festoon its exteriors and interiors with homo colors. And since trannies are allied with homos, they must be holy too. If Jews are holy, then homos are holy because they’re Jews’ best friends, and if homos are holy and if homos say trannies are included in LGBT-ism, then, trannies must be holy too. The logic of Holy-by-Association. Therefore, we better believe a man is a ‘woman’ if he puts on a wig and dress. And of course, his penis and balls can become a ‘vagina’ through surgery. Or, if he decides to keep his penis and balls, he is a ‘woman’ with penis and balls(meaning that penis and balls are no longer distinctly male, and vagina is no longer distinctly female), and you better make sure to believe it because if you don’t, you are ‘transphobic’, and that means you’re a bad bad person. Just have faith in the ‘science’ of LGBT-ism, and believe that a man can have a vagina, and a woman can have a penis. And if you make sure to address him as a ‘her’ or her as a ‘him’, you should be fined for big bucks, and if you don’t pay up, you should be thrown in prison. If you don’t accept the New Truth, you should end up like that baker who refused to bake a homo wedding cake and was prosecuted, dispossessed, and destroyed.

Now, the examples above are all brazen and insane lies, but the Power protected and promoted them. The Power enforced them through all the media and academia they control. Liberal politicians, out of degeneracy or opportunism, enthusiastically got on board, and Conservative politician hung their heads in muted shame in servility to the Power. They knew they lacked the balls to stand up for truth and morality. After all, the Power is with Jews, and if Jews say homos and trannies are their best friends, it is as good as holy writ, indeed as irrevocable as AIPAC demand that the US always favor Zionists over Palestinians(despite the fact that Jews never tire of decrying Old ‘white supremacist’ America for having favored certain groups over others).

Well, what happens to society and culture when that level of mendacity is not only permitted, not only promoted, but even enforced and sanctified by attacking and destroying any voice or agenda that won’t play ball? The end result was the spread of Lying as the New Truth.

BLM was the black counterpart to LGBTQ. Blacks got envious of homos getting all the love and attention with their spectacular lies and hype, so why shouldn’t blacks do likewise and scream ‘black lives matter’ even though the biggest threat to black lives in America is guns and knives in the hands of other blacks. Notwithstanding the problems of police brutality and corruption, black lives are saved by increased police presence. But who cares about the truth when fantasy feels so much better? And if homos have the 'right' to alter reality to whatever they wish, why shouldn't blacks do likewise. When blacks sided with OJ Simpson, much of white America still had the fortitude to shake its head and cry foul. But with BLM in the Age of Obama, we were all supposed to believe in its utterly crazy premise of white cops going around randomly killing innocent blacks. Just like straight society no longer said NO to homo vanities, white society succumbed to Obama-ism and couldn't say NO to BLM lies, what with the mendacious Jew-run media pushing it 24/7.

We always had lies, but the lies today are truly mind-boggling. During the Cold War, it’s true that US exaggerated and lied about Soviet strengths. Still, it was true enough that the USSR was a superpower and a rival to the US. It had also been inhuman and committed mass terror and carried out mass-killings. And even after Stalinism, it remained repressive and left people no choice but to submit to Big Brother.

But is Russia today a ‘new nazi nation’? Is Vladmit Putin really a ‘new hitler’? Where do the media get this stuff? It’s totally fantastic. For over a year, we’ve been bombarded with nonsense reports about how Russia hacked the election. And this from a nation that gloats about how it successfully screwed over so many nations with CIA dirty tricks and secret meddling through NGO’s. And this from Liberals whose great pride during the Cold War was having stood up to ‘paranoid’ and ‘hysterical’ red-baiting elements of the American Right and the military-industrial complex. Was there never any principle involved, or have the new Liberals, in their total collusion with the Deep State and Military-Industrial Complex, completely lost their bearings with too much power, privilege, and connections?

And just how did War on Terror turn into War with Terror against Assad and Gaddafi? How did the US, which got involved in the Middle East after 9/11 in the name of taking out terrorists, forge an alliance with remnant Alqaeda elements(labeled as ‘moderate rebels’) in the destabilization of secular and modern Arab state? How could so many people in media and academia remain so utterly silent about this? Was it because Obama was supposed to be The One, and therefore his presidency was not to be derailed by the revelation that his foreign policy turned out to be even worse than that of George W. Bush? But then, wasn’t Obama himself just one big lie than The One? A huckster pimp elevated to some Hollywood vision of Jesus, Lincoln, Kennedy, MLK, Sidney Poitier, and even Reagan all rolled into a nothing-burrito? Yes, even Reagan. When there is just one total power in the media(that of Jewish globalists), the truth is infinitely malleable according to its whims.

The insipid war on ‘essentialism’ has led to preference for fantasy over reality. So, if Bruce Jenner fantasizes that he is a woman, he is, and you better believe it. And if illegals fantasize that they are ‘dreamers’, they are more-American-than-real-Americans, and we must swallow that BS too.
And if blacks and cucks fantasize about this Wakanda in BLACK PANTHER, we should get all excited and pretend it’s better than real. It is Black Eden and Valhalla that WE must build for them because such a ‘cool’ and ‘badass’ people deserve something so awesome. Favor the fantasy. And never mind that yuppie Progs have been using immigration, gentrification, and incarceration to save cities from black crime. Just believe in Wakandanics as a legit vision on how Earth can become a Black Planet.

LGBTQ-ism was one of the worst cancers to befall mankind. Cowen’s smug view wasn’t worth beans… but then he’s the guy who wants us to subsist on beans.

In a nutshell, Lies + Righteousness = Cultural Cancer. Ordinary lies just come and go. Big lies exposed as such are shamed and destroyed. But when big lies are consecrated as the New Truth, it not only kills one truth with an ugly lie but sets the template for endless multiplication of lies. Once a civilization is about favoring the big lie over the essential truth, it sends a message throughout the system that a lie has precedence over the truth. The Power feels it can peddle any lie as the truth since it not only got away with a big lie but convinced the masses of its holiness.
And in a democratic nation like the US, such template emboldens everyone to feel that he or she also has a ‘right’ to demand that his or her fantasy be favored over the inconvenient fact. So, if Lena Dunham is convinced that she is sexy and attractive, we are supposed to play along.

Lies are just lies but when lies are armed with righteousness, it emboldens other liars, fantasists, and nutjobs to follow suit and make similar demands.

Now, Tyler Cowen is right that ‘gay marriage’ didn’t lead to explosions, fires, earthquakes, volcanoes, and comets falling from the sky. But not every catastrophe is so dramatic. It’s like smoking. Almost no one dies of cancer or heart disease right away because he or she begins to smoke. But the risk of cancer is much higher... just like fecal penetration greatly increases the chance of anal cancer. Not every deadly thing is sudden or violent. Rather, the effect can be insidious. This is the nature of cancer. Cancer doesn’t begin with a bang. It begins with the most silent of whimpers. It involves just a few cells. If it begins so small and so quietly, why is it so deadly? Because it introduces a new ‘code’ into the system. Prior to the development of cancer, the body followed a code that regarded cancerous cells as dangerous. So, those cells were corrected, contained, or destroyed. But what happens when cancer begins to go out of control? At that point, the body has lost the means to say NO to the spread of this new programming. Even the healthiest bodies have some cancer cells, but they remain alert and identify the cancer cells as problems to be dealt with. It’s like even good societies have lies and corruption, but the system works hard minimize such bad things. But when the body loses the means to say NO to cancer cells, it is as if the cancer has been ‘consecrated’(or cancercrated) in the body. They now feel emboldened to keep growing and spreading, and in time, they take over the entire body.

LGBT-ism was cancerous, but it still could have been held in check if enough Americans and if the institutions upheld the eternal truths of biology and morality. As long as the main coding of the system only tolerated LGBT-ism while maintaining the core truths of biology and core values of morality, the LGBT-cancer cells could have been contained. But when the very core institutions of media, academia, government, and then even the church accepted the total lies of LGBT anti-essentialist biology and the degenerate immorality that would have us pretend that two men or two women could have kids together, it led to the big cancer of ‘gay marriage’.

Marriage has been the most essential, most crucial, most meaningful, and most fundamental core institution of human civilization. It is the mother of all covenants. It fuses true biology with true morality, the idea that man and woman should commit to one another to take care of children they create together. This was no game, no lifestyle choice, no fashion. It was the core truth from which life sprung and found meaning. In a tolerant society, homos can be homos and can live together and pretend to be ‘mates’, but homo stuff can never be marriage, just like imitation crab meat cannot be real crab meat, just like a plastic tomato can never be real tomato, and just like fool’s gold cannot be real gold(even if one invokes ‘metal equality’). ‘Gay marriage’ was pushed on the notion of ‘marriage equality’, as if invoking ‘equality’ justifies anything. In fact, it is demented to pretend that things of such unequal value have equal value. According to LGBT-ism, we must pretend that a man’s anus has equal value as a woman’s vagina in the name of ‘sexual organ’ equality. This mindset has led to trannies insisting that a penis and balls can be female sex organs if they so choose to believe. What ‘gay marriage’ set off was a hell. The ideas behind ‘gay marriage’ undermine core truths and principles and forces us to not only accept the lie but treat it as holy writ. Being forced to live with lies is one thing. But when lies are consecrated, they turn cancerous. When incest-freaks call for ‘same family marriage’ and if polygamists call for multi-marriage in the name of ‘marriage equality’, what will the likes of Cowen say?

But the cancer of LGBT-ism goes much further than issues of sex and morality. It created a culture where a lie isn’t only to be tolerated but esteemed, revered, and even worshiped. Hang the LGBT flag in churches and make believe that Jesus died to honor men who indulge in fecal penetration and men who go around pretending that their penises and balls are really female sex organs. When that kind of lies is instilled in the hearts and minds of children all over America, the message is loud and clear. There is no set truth, there is no set morality, there is no real biology. The New Truth is about pushing one’s fantasy as fact with the hope and dream that it will come true. And how do you make it 'come true'? By gaining power like Jews and homos who, with their vast media and deep state power, now feel emboldened to make up any bunch of lies and spread them shamelessly. The reason why this Russia Hacking nonsense has gone on for as long as it did is because we no longer have a culture based on any sense of truth. Instead, truth is just a game played by those with power.

Since Jews and homos have the most power and since both groups have a tendency toward neurosis, we are living in a real clusterfuc* world. Just how did Jennifer Rubin Erderly concoct that bullshi* story in Rolling Stone magazine about the gang-nazi-rape that never happened at UVA and fool so many people? It was not only because PC silenced so many voices but because LGBT-ism encouraged us to tell brazen lies and indulge in loony fantasies about 50 genders and pretend they’re all real. But don’t just pretend but press on all of society to comply to the demands of one’s ego and vanity.

American Domestic Policy Will Come to Resemble Foreign Policy as the Nation Becomes More Diverse under Globalism

A Globo-Nihilist World of Universal Gangsterism

It should be plainly obvious to anyone with even basic knowledge of world affairs that foreign policy tends to be far more cynical, craven, and criminal than domestic policy. This is almost universally the case. Granted, some tyrant who treats his own people like dirt will likely be more responsible in foreign policy simply because he can’t push other nations around like he can trample on his own people. Mugabe, while he was strongman of Zimbabwe, had very little regard for his own people who acted like dirt and were treated like dirt. Though Mugabe reeked of contempt for other nations as well, especially white ones, he couldn’t push them around like he could his own people. And of course, tyrants like Josef Stalin and Mao Zedong were more mindful when dealing with great powers than in dealing with their own people who were regarded as little more than sheep or cattle. But those are extreme cases of tyrants with immense power and totalitarian means to carry out any amount of atrocities and bloodbaths.

In most cases, the leaders and elites must be mindful or mindful enough of the people they rule, and this applies even to autocratic nations where the ruling class is not all-powerful and could be in serious trouble if they lose the support of the masses. This has especially been true since the near-universalization of the Enlightenment democratic principle that the leaders exist to serve the people than the people exist to serve the leaders. So, even autocrats must do more than merely give lip-service to this ideal. Otherwise, it could lead to the erosion of popular support or, lacking such enthusiasm, of the people’s willingness to submit. After all, even people who submit out of fear may continue to do so if they believe that the rulers are doing a good enough job.

So, in most nations around the world, the Rule is that the leaders must be especially mindful of the people they govern. Unless they can persuade the people that they care and are doing the best for the nation, they could lose the modern equivalent of the ‘divine right’ or ‘mandate from heaven’. In the modern world, the mandate comes from the people. And since all leaders are elected only by the people of the nation, they must be bound to their own nation. And even if they are autocrats, their justification for power is National Interest. So, the Cuban government, though non-democratic, claim to be watching out for the interest of the Cuban people. The government of the CCP in China claim to represent the Will of the Chinese People. Turkey’s Erdogan’s increasing autocratic grip is predicated on the notion that his regime needs extrajudicial powers in the present situation because foreign enemies and agents(possibly even the American ally) are out to undermine Turkish sovereignty. And for this reason, domestic politics can’t be as cynical, cutthroat, opportunistic, nihilistic, and gangsterish as foreign policy. On the outside, foreign relations may seem more civil and considerate. After all, it’s called diplomacy, and national leaders are expected to act statesmanlike on the world stage. So, even leaders of nations with cultures as different as the US and Saudi Arabia are cordial and well-mannered in their discussions and negotiations. In contrast, there is much bickering between the ‘left’ and ‘right’ in UK parliament and US Congress.

But in foreign relations, the veneer of mutual respect is just that: A veneer. Indeed, mutual good manners are necessary precisely because so many nations agree on so little in terms of historical narrative, culture, religion, social values, and national interest. So, it’s all a case of smiling while holding a knife behind their backs. It’s like the show of ‘respect’ in THE GODFATHER films. It’s just a way of doing business because there is nothing but ‘business’ among different nations. Josef Stalin surely found out the hard way when Adolf Hitler, who’d approached him with seeming respect, suddenly launched a surprise attack on the USSR. Hitler acted like Michael Corleone in the final act of THE GODFATHER. (Michael put the other big families at ease and then sprung an attack when they least expected it.) And Muammar Gaddafi also found out the hard way when the very Western leaders who’d been all smiles, handshakes, and pats on the back turned on him and crushed his regime. And when he was brutally lynched to death, there was Hillary Clinton cackling like the Wicked Witch of the West in THE WIZARD OF OZ.

So, foreign policy is never ever to be trusted. It is gangster politics of ever-shifting alliances predicated on the most nakedly brazen of political interests(mostly of the elites because most people of any nation have no stake in world affairs or world power). Consider how the US was all smiles and handshakes with Saddam Hussein when he was fighting Iran. Even when Hussein used poison gas and launched missiles on civilian targets in Iran, the US sent him arms while pretending to be neutral. Worse, the US, via Israel and other proxies, even sent arms to Iran to prolong the war between Iran and Iraq as long as possible. Foreign policy can be THIS cynical, nasty, and brutal. Later, after the Gulf War, the US decided to force sanctions in Iraq that led to the deaths of 100,000s of women and children by some accounts. Again, this sort of thing is easier done to another nation than to one’s own people. Indeed, it’s telling that George W. Bush got more flak for the supposed botch-up of the Hurricane Katrina disaster relief than for what he did to Iraq(including the grisly Abu Gharid episode) and neighboring nations. In the case of New Orleans, the main culprit was the weather and broken levees, but Bush was held accountable for something he had little control of. The disaster killed around 1,800 people, but it was a much bigger issue for Americans than Bush’s wars that killed 100,000s not only by US guns and bombs but by unleashing a civil war that Bush’s clownish regime hadn’t foreseen or prepared for.

So, what does that tell you? Because the US government and American elites aren’t accountable to the world, they can act with utmost impunity, mendacity, opportunism, cruelty, sadism, and total disregard. After all, people in nations destroyed by the US aren’t going to vote in US elections. They aren’t going to donate to US politicians. And as they don’t control the US media, their side of the story isn’t going to be told to the American public, most of whom, by the way, are indifferent to what’s happening around the world(despite their nation being a superpower that can make or break any nation) because they are mainly immersed in hedonism and narcissism. (Granted, most people are like that all over the world, and in that sense, Americans are no worse. However, Americans have greater responsibility to be knowledgeable because they elect leaders whose power can profoundly affect the lives of millions, even billions, of people around the world. If a people live in an inconsequential nation like Iceland or Finland, it doesn’t matter because their governments are NOT going to threaten, destroy, or invade other nations. But when the peoples of Germany and Japan failed in the 1930s to stop their governments from acting recklessly in foreign affairs, the result was catastrophe for the world and their own nations. And for this reason, Americans don’t have a choice. Given the power of the US to destroy the world, all Americans must feel compelled to know about what is happening around the world. It’s because so many Americans are ‘insouciant’[as Paul Craig Roberts calls them] that the Bush regime was able to hoodwink Americans to just go along with a war based on total lies. And it was also why most Obama voters hadn’t a clue as to what was really happening in Libya, Ukraine, Syria, & Yemen and with Russia.) If the US were a better nation, then the media, as the fourth estate, would do its role in informing Americans about what is really happening around the world, what kind of people have the most power and what kinds of agendas they are pushing, and what the tragic toll of all this amounts to, but the media are owned by the People of Power; so, why would the Power expose its dark truths to the People?

During the Cold War, there was more of a balance of power among the elites as there was no single consensus ‘truth’. Many on the Left genuinely believed in socialism, even communism. As such, they entered journalism to expose what they regarded as the rot and disease of capitalism and greed. And many Jews, fast rising in power and privilege, felt it was their calling as both tribesmen and idealists to speak truth to Wasp elite power. Jews regarded their opposition as both ‘good for the Jews’ and ‘good for All Americans’ since it is always good to knock the top dog down a few pegs.

Back in the 1960s, despite the eroding prestige of traditional institutions, they still exerted a large and heavy, even if increasingly ‘silent’, influence. The Catholic Church couldn’t be ignored. And as long as there were many people who’d grown up prior to the 60s, their formative experiences had made them culturally and morally more conservative, not least because the Great Depression and WWII had had a very sobering impact on many Americans of all races and classes. Also, the American South still clung to its own narrative, and this was represented in both the Democratic and Republican Parties. For a long time, the Democratic Party relied on Dixiecrat votes. And the Republicans, to make further gains, especially as immigrant-heavy and black-heavy big cities were so solidly Democratic, also reached out to the South. Even though the Civil Rights Movement was gaining the moral upperhand, the South had its own counter-narrative that went heard in many political circles.
And the mounting tensions from the Vietnam War led to the rise of anti-war voices and patriotic voices. So, there was no single narrative, no single truth, no absolute consensus. Back in the 1960s, the Liberals had genuine radical leftists on their side, and someone like Bill Buckley on the Right could even voice Segregationist sentiments. Some really thought the Soviet Union was a pretty good nation and represented the hope of mankind, at least in supporting Third World anti-imperialist causes that would have been lost without Soviet backing. And some others really thought that the Soviet Union posed the greatest menace to world and thought a far more muscular foreign policy was necessary to roll back communism and hopefully defeat it. And when the feminist movement exploded on the scene, there was a wide range of opinions pro- and con-. But over the years, most of the voices and values grew silent and faded away, leaving only one voice to speak for all in the name of End of History. Catholic power faded, what with even Catholic Americans caring more about Rock, drugs, and sex. Church teachings sounded lame and boring to them. Also, the Church was rocked by pedophile sex scandals, especially damaging because the Jewish media and law firms piled on to bleed the Church dry. As for the Mainline denominations, they became increasingly secular and decadent, and most people lost interest. Today, Mainline churches mostly stand empty and are run mostly be lesbians who apparently have nothing better to do than playact as ‘christians’.

Jewish faith has eroded too, but Jewish power grew stronger because Jewishness doesn’t need religious faith to carry on. It is essentially a blood identity, an ethnicity. So, even Jews who lost faith remained as proud Jews and worked with religious Jews to expand Jewish power. As for older people and their attitudes & values, they all faded as they grew old and died. Indeed, how many members of the Greatest Generation are still alive? Their values died with them because they never formed institutions or created new traditions to keep their morals and values alive. As time passed, Jews gained even more control of the media, and they pushed only one Narrative that favored Jews, blacks, and feminists, thereby putting their opponents on the moral defensive.
The opponents of Jews, blacks, and feminists suffered from two deficits. They weren’t as adept, clever, and crafty as Jews in formulating their counterattack. Also, even if they could, they didn’t have the material and financial means to do so because Jews and Liberals controlled most of the media. Furthermore, pushy Jews, via the TV shows ROOTS and THE HOLOCAUST, made blacks and Jews the holy peoples of the world, making it nearly impossible to be critical of them without being called names. Also, Jews employed the dirty trick of guilt-by-association. Though Jews denounced such tactics when used by Joseph McCarthy, they gleefully denounced peoples, institutions, and industries by exposing their ties to ‘unsavory’ groups. Jews used ADL, SPLC, and NAACP(though black, it was largely funded by Jews) to do the dirty work on this. So, while any bunch of Jews could hang out with radical leftists, real-life hoodlums, Zionist imperialists, and financial sharks, it became political & financial suicide for any white gentile to have even the most tenuous ties with ‘far-right’, ‘antisemitic’, or ‘racist’ individuals or organizations. And later, this was extended to ‘sexist’ and ‘homophobic’ figures. Because Jewish media made such a big stink about McCarthyism and Red Scare, it was bad form to point out that elite colleges and media had many leftist and even far-leftist types. It was even worse to point out that many of these leftists were Jewish or closely affiliated with powerful Jews. Such noticing was deemed ‘antisemitic’, ‘paranoid’, and ‘red-baiting’.

In contrast, Jews and their allies could blow the whistle on the even the flimsiest connection between white gentiles(especially white conservatives) and anyone with the slightest odor of ‘hate’. Remember how the media deemed it bad form to make a big deal out of Obama’s ties with Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright. However, the media went after Trump for being supported by David Duke even though Trump never met Duke. Trump was told to disavow a man he’d never avowed in the first place. In this climate, Jews and Liberals could maintain connections and alliances with the Left and even Far Left whereas American Conservatives and white gentiles couldn’t venture beyond Conservatism Inc. The Right has been so vilified that many Americans believe that even the moderate Right is worse than the farthest Left. And if young people at least were read about and were taught about the horrors of communism during the Cold War, most of that has gone down the memory hole because most college professors hardly touch on the evils committed by the radical left in the 20th century. This is why we have the "There is only one side" mentality at Charlottesville. The Alt Right cannot even exercise their basic Constitutional Rights, whereas Antifa lunatics can run wild, attack people, and destroy property, but still be tolerated by authorities that take orders from Jewish elites.
Through ideas and idols, the ‘left’ has thoroughly indoctrinated and ‘icontrinated’ the majority of Americans into believing that there is only one truth, and there is no room for debate or discussion. And yet, things are actually even more impoverished ideologically and morally because even the real Left has been effectively paralyzed. Even though there are still many Marxist and communist types in universities, they exert almost zero influence on culture and power. They either spend most of their time on ridiculous 50-gender issues OR fixate on trivial stuff like ‘body positivity’, ‘slut pride’, or ‘empowerment’ through pop culture.
The End of History, in gloating over the fall of communism and the false god of Marxism, left the Power with only one objective: Power. Francis Fukuyama’s Liberal Triumphalism meant a death knell not only to Communism and Fascism but to religion, tradition, community, culture, patriotism, family, national sovereignty, and etc. Granted, those values had already eroded so much by the fall of communism. But as long as the communist empire existed, many people in the West still felt invested in and bound together by some great cause and conviction: To defeat the Evil Empire, like Rocky defeated Ivan Drago in part IV. But when the Soviet Empire collapsed, there really was nothing standing but power and greed. Though Fukuyama declared Liberalism as champion, he couldn’t have been more wrong. As events would prove, the real winner of the Cold War was Jewish supremacism. By the end of the Cold War, Jews had taken over most top institutions and industries. Since most Jews claimed to be ‘liberal’, they could have favored liberal values over Jewish interests, but blood turned out to be more powerful than ink among Jews. Unlike Wasps who really went from racial mindset to an ideological and liberal one, Jews moved away from liberalism to neo-tribalism. Jews, who’d been proud of their defense of civil liberties(even for Neo-Nazis) through their support of the ACLU, lost interest in tolerance & free speech and increasingly pushed Political Correctness in media and academia. With every year, journalism had a tighter list of do’s and don’ts. And universities went from a breeding ground for dissent and debate to a place of consensus based on indoctrination and intimidation. Increasingly, more ideologically charged classes and sessions became Mandatory for all students. If the Right became morally and ideologically restricted and curtailed(to the point where Conservatives could only defend abstract principles like individual liberty and private property but couldn’t invoke any pride in whiteness or European heritage, even though, for some reason, it was mandatory for them to fervently support Jewish pride and Israel), the Left was ignored and treated as irrelevant. Even though Marxists were not defacto banned like the race-ists and fascists from media and academia, they were treated as irrelevant nuisance, and indeed they were just that.

Too many former leftist boomers had made too much money and got too powerful. They’d seen the failure of the communist model in the Soviet Union. They’d seen the rise of China under capitalism. So, there was only one game in town, and it was capitalism. But if capitalism of yesteryear was associated closely with nationalism and liberalism(and rule of law), the new globalist capitalism raised the stakes of power and profit much higher, and so, the new elites of the state and big business no longer had any concern for the nation or the people. The people themselves became a nuisance, an obstacle to more profits and power for themselves. And the Rule of Law just came to be seen as outdated ‘regulations’. So, Wall Street was deregulated to the point where financial system operated like a casino. And with loosening morality in an America growing ever more shameless and degenerate, the business of gambling, that had once been considered a vice that should be restricted to a few cities, spread all over America. The most blatant example of this new kind of capitalism was in Russia in the 90s. Despite erosion of values, institutions, and morals, there was sufficient checks and balances in the US to prevent something on the scale of what happened in Russia. But following the fall of the Soviet Empire when the old controls were gone but a new one yet to develop, the Jewish globalist capitalists swooped into Russia to game the system and loot as much of Russian national property as possible. It was surely the biggest looting in the world history. This was the real End of History, which was the Beginning of the Power. A future of gangsterism and tribalism.

In this game, only those with fanatical power-lust and tribal zeal will come out on top. Those who only care about money will not win big. Bill Gates is super-rich as an individual, but he belongs to nothing bigger than himself. As for tribes without power-lust, they will be nothing. Amish have a tight-knit community, but they mean nothing to the world. Mormons do care about power/wealth and group cohesion, but Mormon are nowhere near the ability of Jews, and they lack tribal pride. Whatever that had been tribal and racial about Mormonism is no more. It is now in evangelical mode, and it won’t be long before it takes in too many dummies and non-whites. Jews are identity-zealots and power-obsessives. The only people who are comparable in the world today are the Chinese.

Even though many white gentiles are rich and powerful as individuals, they lack collective power because PC instilled white minds to disdain any power organized around whiteness or European themes. So, Europeans are going about Africanizing European identity and heritage. This has gone furthest in Sweden and the UK where even historical figures are made into blacks in TV shows and movies.
It’s as if blacks have a special claim and right to European history, heritage, and heroes. It’s no longer enough for blacks to have their own history and heritage. Because Africans have no written history and no record of great achievements, they want to take over white histories, legends, and mythologies. And since white people have grown so admiring of blacks in sports & pop culture, they want to present white history to blacks as a gift. Also, because whiteness has been so impugned, whites find it difficult to take pride in white heroes of history. The ONLY way they can make white history ‘good’ again is by turning white heroes into black ones. It’s like Alexander Hamilton as a white male is, well, just a ‘dead white male’, one of those ‘bad guys’, the villains of history responsible for all that went wrong with mankind. But if you turn him and other Founding Fathers into rapping Negroes, they are suddenly ‘cool’, and white people are allowed to get all excited about them.

Anyway, foreign policy is dirty business. While it’s true that all politicians are weasels and even politics-at-home is usually sleazy and slimy, there are still limits to what politicians can do at home. No matter how much Obama hated white conservatives, he couldn’t do against them what he did to Libya, Ukraine, and Syria. And even though the Jewish-run ‘liberal’ media lie through their teeth about whites and conservatives, they can’t lie about Americans the way they can lie about foreign nations and foreign affairs. The media told a big lie about Trayvon Martin and Ferguson, BUT it was nothing like the lies they told about Libya, Ukraine, and Syria that led to the destruction of entire nations. Also, because enough Americans still do care about what happens IN America, there are voices to counter and correct the Narrative pushed by Jewish-run MSM. Also, despite Obama and Holder’s support of BLM and other lunatics, they wouldn’t dare push the violence like they pushed the violence in Libya and Ukraine. At the very least, the Obama regime wouldn’t have dared to send air strikes against white conservatives who oppose BLM. In contrast, the NATO gained control of air space in Libya and dropped endless bombs on Gaddafi until the rebels closed in on the capital, captured the dictator, and lynched him to death. The US could do stuff like that with other nations because US laws, rights, and protections don’t apply to other nations and foreign peoples.
If there are bad guys in the US, the government must follow proper procedures to pursue and arrest the culprits or suspects. But on foreign lands, the US government can just rely on some unverified intelligence to send drone strikes to blow up ‘terrorists’ and if lots of innocent people get killed in the bargain, so what?
So, all the restraints that apply in the US don’t apply in other nations. Even though the elites of America are lowlife scum and would love to rule with an iron fist, as long as American domestic politics is national and proscribed by Rule of Law, they can’t act in pure gangster-nihilist mode. They must follow the rule book. Also, as representatives and servants of the American People, they must demonstrate their loyalty and concern for the American people. Even if these elites look down on most Americans as worthless losers, they can’t be candid about their feelings and must always assure the American people that they have the interests, rights, and protections of American people at heart.

But what happens with increasing Diversity that makes America resemble the world than a distinct nation? We’ve seen how US foreign policy works in other nations. The Deep State will do just about anything and stoop to any level to gain an advantage over other nations. If it takes spying, drone strikes, subversion, invasion, torture, and etc, so be it. Around the world, the US is dealing with strangers. Since they are strangers, the US government owes them no due process and respect. Since they’re strangers, the US government doesn’t have to represent and protect them. The US government is free to do anything to gain the advantage against such strange peoples all over the world. Also, there doesn’t need to be and indeed there can’t be any consistency of rules, values, or methodology in dealing with all those strange peoples because they are all different from the US and from each other. So, the US makes up new rules and concocts new methods for dealing with each people. In contrast, in domestic politics and governance within a single particular nation, people do expect the government to be consistent, predictable, and principled in its affairs. In national politics, the government doesn’t see the people of the nation as strangers but fellow countrymen bound by blood, values, history, and/or principles.

But if the US becomes more diverse, then the varied and diverse Americans will begin to see each other as strangers. During the Great Depression and WWII, the US government was white and most Americans were white. So, the white government looked upon the white masses as fellow countrymen. And when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, all Americans from top to bottom understood what it meant to be attacked by ‘Japs’. Hoover, Roosevelt, Truman, and Eisenhower had one thing in common in feeling a common bond with the American people who were seen as fellow countrymen. Even though there was ethnic diversity, most non-Anglos had been educated to be good patriots on the Anglo-American model. There was the black problem, but as blacks made up 10% of the population and aspired to be accepted and respected by white society, they too could be seen as fellow Americans. And especially beginning with Truman, there was a concerted effort to do right by the Negroes.

Now, of course, there was lots of corruption in politics and business back then as well. Politics being politics and business being business, corruption will always be with us. But when the nation was more cohesive, the US domestic policy was indeed based on the nationalist and patriotic sense that the government must do right by the people. In other words, the US government must not treat fellow Americans in the way it might treat Iranians, Guatemalans, Cubans, Vietnamese, Mexicans, and etc. If the US government and multi-national corporations approach foreign nations and strange peoples as just pawns, puppets, markets, or rivals/enemies in a ceaseless global gangster turf war, it simply wouldn’t do to see American people that way. Whether citizens of America are on the left or on the right, the US government must treat them all as fellow Americans with same protections under the law. In contrast, no such rules apply to foreign nations. It’s like, if a Muslim-American admires Osama Bin Laden and hates the US, he still has all the access to US government services, enjoys all the basic rights and protections, and has the same voting rights as any other American. In contrast, if he held such views in the Middle East, he could end up dying in drone strike. Or, if he’s fighting an enemy of Israel, he could be armed and funded by the CIA to commit acts of terror.
In contrast, it would be scandalous for the FBI or CIA to directly fund Antifa groups to attack white conservatives and patriots. But the US unreservedly funded and aided Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine to topple the government there.

If a government acts more responsibly and restrained on the national level and in domestic mode than on the global level in foreign policy mode, what happens when excessive Diversity makes a nation into just a smaller version of the world? Even if the US still continues as a nation-state, will it act like one when it resembles a mini-world than a self-contained nation?
And if leaders like Roosevelt and Eisenhower felt a direct and deep connection with most Americans as fellow countrymen, how do the current government and Deep State look upon most Americans? Despite all the hollow rhetoric about how ‘diversity is our strength’, the fact is white elites in Deep State don't feel any real deep connection with Muslims, Mexicans, Asians, Hindus, Arabs, and host of other non-white groups. (And when non-whites reach elite status, they not only fail to form a bond with whites but lose the bond to their own people. They turn into political zombies.) Instead of growing nearer non-whites, these white elite operatives will only grow further apart from white Americans. The official line says white elites are one with non-whites, but the fact is they feel and remain separate from non-whites except in the most superficial way(and this accounts as to why globalized Western culture gets more superficial since it is only on such level that diverse people can communicate and get along). It’s a full-time job for elites to feel as one with ONE people. It’s impossible to feel one with over a 100 ethnic groups in the US. But because white elites must make an effort to connect with non-whites, they must disconnect their bonds and loyalties to whites. The end result is nothing but cynicism and nihilism. Unable to connect or really care about non-whites and no longer connected to whites, the only thing left for these Deep State elites is "what’s in it for me?" They just become soulless careerists whose only obsession is status, position, and privilege. To keep the status and rise higher, they will say and do ANYTHING to get what’s theirs. Isn’t this what we see in a soulless careerist robot like James Comey? This also goes for Hillary Clinton. In the end, did she care about anything? Did she care about white people or the working class? Of course, that would have been anathema in New America. White leaders caring about white people? Why, that would be ‘nazi’ and ‘racist’. So, did she really care all about all those trannies, slut priders, Muslims, blacks, Mexicans, Hindus, Chinese, and etc., the kind of people with whom she has zero cultural connection or rapport? No, it was all just for show. Like Comey, she isn’t allowed to connect with whites and is unable to connect with non-whites. All she had left was self-serving careerism. Same with Theresa May and all the other cretins.

Diversity means no shared standards, values, meanings, or identities. That is why foreign policy is a game of gangsters. Since the rules, values, loyalties, norms, and the narrative of one nation are so different from those of other nations, the only way that nations can play the game is through distrust, cynicism, espionage, and dirty tricks more commonly associated with gangsters.

Indeed, when we compare the FBI and the CIA, why does the latter have more sinister connotations? FBI has skeletons in its closet too, but because it’s a domestic and national law enforcement organization, it must be careful not to deviate too far from the Rule of Law that protects the rights of all Americans. Americans care more about a wrong done to a US citizen by US government than a wrong done to 100,000 foreigners by the same government.

In contrast, the CIA has been involved in outright subversion, espionage, aid to terrorists, torture, spreading fake propaganda, meddling in foreign elections, bribery, and aiding Pentagon in the invasion of other nations.
Recent revelations about the FBI show how corrupt the agency can be, but the FBI has also played a prominent role in taking down organized crime in the US. In contrast, the CIA has been linked with organized criminals, terrorist, and even neo-Nazis in its nihilistic effort to do just about anything to spread the oligarchic hegemony of the US. As the US becomes more like the world, the rulers of the US will act more like CIA than the FBI in dealing with the American people. The people will no longer be seen a citizens and fellow countrymen but as pawns in a game. Consider the Carol Reed film THE THIRD MAN. When the nihilist American Harry Lime was in war-torn Austria, he didn't see the people there as his fellow countrymen. No, they were just units, pawns, or fleas. He felt no connection to them, and their lives didn’t matter to him. He acted only for himself and for money.

In the current America, the problem goes deeper than white elites no longer feeling a bond with white Americans and being unable to really connect with non-whites. There is a power above that of white elites, and of course, it’s the Jewish elites. Too many Jews are in arrogant, contemptuous, and hostile supremacist mode in relation to gentiles. Jews mainly identify with fellow Jews all over the world than with fellow Americans, most of whom are goyim. American Jews cared more about Soviet Jews than for fellow Americans who might be Catholic or Baptist. And once those Soviet Jews came to the US, they felt far closer to Jews in UK, France, and Israel than with fellow Americans who happen to be gentile.
Did Madeline Albright feel anything for the 500,000 Iraqi children that might have died as the result of US sanctions concocted by Zionists? No. Why not? Because the kids weren’t Jewish. As a thought experiment, let’s suppose Israel comes under the rule of someone as ‘evil’ as Saddam Hussein. Suppose the US calls out on this Jewish Hussein who is denounced as a 'new hitler'. Suppose the US calls for sanctions that might starve 100,000s of Jewish kids to death. Would Jews support such a policy in the name of getting rid of an evil dictator? No way. Jews care for fellow Jews. That, in and of itself, is good. A people should care for their own kind. Now, it’s possible for a people to love their own kind the most but still respect and care about other peoples. This quality is woefully missing from most Jews who will cause any amount of harm to others just so Jews can have it all. The sheer obnoxiousness and vileness of Jews as they’ve gained supreme power in the US and EU have so clearly illustrated why this thing called ‘antisemitism’ was so rife throughout history. Jews will tell any amount of lies and pull any number of dirty tricks to get their way. The likes of Max Boot and David Brooks are hardly different from Jennifer Rubin Erderly and Stephen Glass in their shameless and insane obsession to spin any story and invent any nonsense to push their agenda that, despite the bogus ‘universalist’ or ‘humanitarian’ rhetoric, really just comes down to, "Is it good for the Jews?"

With uber-elites such as that, with white elites serving them while being disconnected from white masses and unconnected to non-white masses, with white masses no longer represented and led by elites, and with so many non-whites splintered along racial, ethnic, religious, and other lines(and their children having trashy stupid pop culture as their only culture, Homomania as their only faith, and PC as their only rule book), the US will no longer resemble a nation but a mini-world or a mini-empire. Then, it is only natural that US politics will go from the mode of national policy to the mode of foreign policy. It will no longer be a case of elites seeing Americans as fellow countrymen but as a Glob-ful of strangers. And in a world of strangers, everyone will be out for the only thing that still matters: Status, Position, and Privilege.

Instead of Puerto Ricans becoming Americanized, Americans are becoming Puerto-Ricanized.

Nikolas Cruz Is Small Potatoes Compared to Big Time Sociopaths who Destroy Entire Nations

The Florida School shooting adds yet another bloodbath to the long and depressing tally of individuals going loco and randomly killing people. Many critics blame guns, but guns don’t kill people by themselves. Why has there been a spate of such killings since the Columbine incident? Some might argue that the media are to blame for ‘sensationalizing’ these murders with extensive coverage.
While most sane people care about their good name, the crazy ‘losers’ might crave fame and notoriety instead. While it’s natural for people to be liked and admired, what about those who have no such hope? The ones who are ugly, dumb, or just plain unappealing? If likable and talented people attract the right kind of attention, the unlikable and unappealing either get no attention or get the wrong kind of attention: Mockery, bullying, ridicule, rejection, contempt. Now, most people, even if disliked and ignored, learn to accept their lot in life. They find ways to cope and adapt, and in time, they even find people with whom they can form a community of friends and family.
However, certain people aren’t only disliked but troubled and demented due to traumatic child-rearing or genetic reasons. Granted, likable people can be crazy too. Ted Bundy is possibly the most famous case. He was a reasonably good-looking guy with smarts. He held a nice job and had no trouble meeting women. But he became a serial rapist-and-murderer. Still, sick people who are attractive or smart are less likely to end up like Nikolas Cruz. They have more of an incentive to live within bounds because they have something to lose. An attractive person may lose friends and lovers. A smart rich guy may lose his fortune and privilege. Thus, the attractive or smart people with sick souls do what is necessary to remain respectable and find more creative ways to indulge their sickness, like the Podesta brothers.
But if someone is crazy, ugly, and dumb, he has nothing to lose if he were to embark on a horrible act. If anything, they might finally gain the attention that had been missing all their lives.

Things are worse for troubled youth like Nicholas Cruz because there aren’t any moral norms anymore. What passes for right-and-wrong are PC posturing on current issues, gender issues, foreign policy, and historical narratives. Whatever meaning such subjects may have on the nation or the world, it means nothing to the personal life of a young boy. Children need a solid foundation in family life & community and a sense of culture that provides deeper meaning & sense of morality that is relevant to one’s personal existence. After all, ideology or political positions themselves do not secure a stable and meaningful existence for a child. Suppose a child is raised in a family with all the fashionable PC values. The adults that move in and out of the house are all for ‘gay marriage’, ‘trannies in the ladies room’, ‘new cold war with Russia’, ‘hating Trump’, ‘anti-racism’, ‘interracial sex’, and ‘climate change’ legislation. But suppose the adults don’t act like responsible parents or guardians, there’s no discipline(or if such exists, it’s brutal and arbitrary, thus only traumatizing the child) in the home, cultural experience is composed of watching trash on TV & playing ugly video games(and pornified music videos), and no teaching of fundamental right-and-wrongs when it comes to personal virtues such as honesty, propriety, dignity, and due diligence.
This rule applies to conservatives too. Even if the parents are ‘good Christians’ in ideas and values, if they fail to act like responsible adults in instilling their children with proper mindset and attitudes, the kids may grow up all wrong.
Now, generally speaking, conservative values & ideology are more useful in instilling the right kinds of values in children than liberal values & ideology are. This is because conservatism is more grounded in a culture of responsibility, duty, and discipline. Before kids can learn to be free, they need to be molded into young adults with core virtues. Liberalism has great value as a mode of open-mindedness, inquisitiveness, curiosity, and progress. Liberalism is more free-spirited than conservatism, and that can be a good thing. But unless freedom is grounded in respect, discipline, honor, and experience, it has a tendency to become aimless, decadent, and confused. It’s like an athlete isn’t going to get anywhere just by running like a crazy headless chicken no matter how fast or strong he is. He has to respect the coach, learn to take orders, cooperate with others, and train to gain the necessary skills. An athlete will eventually have to learn to be free and find his own footing in the sport, but he has to follow a path that leads gradually from obedience and discipline to ability and agency.
In the past, even American liberalism was grounded in conservative modes and values. Liberal Education didn’t mean you got to do whatever you wanted or blind yourself to everything except the latest fashionable dogma. Rather, you learned from professors with credentials and experience. You learned from the greatest thinkers, scientists, and artists in history. Even if you found the elders' teachings and methods less than ideal, you built upon their knowledge and appreciated their efforts in their time.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt is considered as the greatest liberal president of the 20th century, but he had many conservative concerns about the New Deal. He worried about the potentially negative impact welfare may have on families. It’s doubtful that he would have endorsed the Great Society programs of the 1960s that went about rewarding teenage girls for being pregnant out of wedlock. The New Deal was about lending support to families with solid moral values and to men who wanted to work. America back then had a great sense of shame. New Deal was about offering aid to men and women of virtue who’d fallen on hard times. It was not, as would be the case with Great Society and other programs that followed, the reckless abandonment of culture of responsibility and the soulless rewarding of bad behavior, especially among young black women.
A lot of ‘progressives’ tend to place all the burden of social betterment on rich people and the government — rich should pay more taxes and government should provide more programs — , but the ‘national character’ of a people matter in the outcomes. Indeed, it is THE most decisive factor in the success or failure of nations or communities. Why did Europeans do so much with Marshall Plan while no amount of foreign aid does anything for black Africa or Detroit? What happened to all the money poured into black communities all across America? Why do some nations that receive less foreign aid to better than those who received so much?
And even in Europe, why is there more bang for the government buck among Swedes than among Southern Italians? Despite the current demise of Sweden(entirely due to liberalism-gone-pathological), it was a nice nation for much of the 20th century because most Swedes had civic virtues of diligence, honesty, responsibility, and work ethic. And whatever the ideology, left or right, most Swedes knew how to keep order in the house through proper parenting. As such, most Swedes believed that one should work hard, pay taxes, and take only what is necessary and due from the government. So, there was a culture of give and take between the state and the people. But in Southern Italy, the sheer lack of national character means a lot of people are shameless about lying, cheating, stealing, and acting like the cast of characters in GOODFELLAS.
So, anyone who’d say something like "Southern Italy is backward because the government doesn’t provide the kind of services available in Sweden" is missing the point. Swedes have civic virtue that is taught in every home. (If anything, Sweden’s current problem of Diversity is the result of its virtue of trust & cooperation having been projected onto the whole world. Just because Swedes made a little paradise for themselves, they naively got to thinking that the Swedish model could save the world. And if Swedes failed in exporting their model to African nations, maybe Africans can be made Swedish-like via immigration. In the past, such naive idealism was tempered by rational race-ism that informed most Swedes, even those on the Left, that the races are different, and therefore, most Africans could never be made into nice Swedes. But the rise of PC ideology forbade such rational & sane thinking and replaced it with the reckless conviction that any bunch of African ‘groids’ could be turned into good Swedes. But then, there was another reason for the embrace of Diversity. If one reason was naively idealistic and pro-civilization — the hope of elevating lowly & primitive Africans to the status of advanced Europeans — , the other reason was primitivist. Even though or precisely because Sweden was so nice and orderly, many Swedes grew bored with modernity and civilization. They craved the heat of Afro-jungle boogie-woogie of Afro-pop and American black music. Especially Swedish women developed jungle fever and wanted to have sex with black men and welcome ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. So, the combination of naive idealism and lusty primitivism will destroy Sweden, a nation so far gone that it cannot be saved.)

Anyway, ideologies are about big things. Parenting is not about ideology or big ideas. Whether parents are communist, fascist, Jewish, Catholic, Mormon, Muslim, atheist, socialist, or whatever, there are fundamental rules that apply to ALL families in the proper rearing of children. Kids need love and affection. Kids need discipline and a basic sense of right and wrong, e.g. "Do not steal", "Don’t lie", "Don’t be discourteous", "Don’t kick the dog", "Don’t bully other kids", "love thy parents", and etc. And for kids to grow up with right values, parents have to be mature adults. But is that possible anymore? With the cult of everlasting youth, we have old people who still act like kids. It won’t be long before we have rappers who are 60 yrs old. We see tattoos and piercings among adults all over. What kind of message is that to kids, to grow up in a family where your own parents are marked with ugliness all over their bodies? In the past, the Church used to provide the family with a sense of community with other folks and sense of continuity with the past and tradition. But what are churches nowadays? Many have closed, some are Evangelical nuthouses whose main message is "Muh Israel" and "Nuke Iran" while Mainline churches are about little more than "Muh holy homo". And the Catholic Church is all about "Muh refugees" or "Muh Illegal Immigrants". It’s all about helping Other peoples but offer nothing to the rooted or existing community. It preserves nothing of tradition in terms of demographic & culture and only seeks to replace the existing faithful with waves of foreigners, immigrants, or illegals. If anything, Diversity made things much worse. Even in affluent communities, diversity tends to undermine a sense of togetherness. When American cities used to be divided along ethnic lines, the Irish in Irish town, Italians in Italian town, and Poles in Polish town had a sense of their own ethnic community. It’s like how Mike Royko used to remember how people in his neighborhood, many of them of shared ethnicity, would to all come out and celebrate Fourth of July together. Especially damaging was feminism because, even in a world of Diversity, there can be the core foundation of family within the home at least. Even if a Pole marries an Italian, there is at least the family, father and mother to raise the child. And for a child, nothing is more important than the unity of man and woman as his parents who are committed to one another and to their children. So, even in a world of ethnic and racial strangers, a child can feel whole and part of an organic unit if he has father and mother. But feminism drove a wedge between this most essential of unions. It encouraged too many women to see men as The Enemy or filled women with the idea that they can raise children alone without the men who should just come and go into their lives as ‘boyfriends’. This had a totally toxic impact on society, but most critics, even conservatives, are loathe to say this because the demented feminist-dominant ideology deems such sane views as ‘misogynist’.

Also, the rise of electronic media meant the erasure of community in many parts of America. In the past, if people in a local community needed the news, they got together in the town square to chat. Or they gathered together at rallies or meetings. It’s like how people act in MEET JOHN DOE and IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE. But with the rise of TV and electronic media, people can just sit home and get all the news and information. Now, it wouldn’t be so bad if every locality had more autonomy over its own media. But in fact, most of what is beamed to every community, big or small, in the US, is controlled by a handful of conglomerates, all of which are owned and/or controlled by Jewish globalists whose idea of the highest virtue is Homomania.
Worse, the increasing crassness and vulgarity of American culture has made Americans far more shameless. In the 70s, a talk show was something like Phil Donahue. But by the 80s, it was turning into something like Oprah and Jerry Springer. Both were corrosive in their own way. Oprah went from just another talkshow host to an object of worship. This shameless and self-aggrandizing fat black woman was supposed to represent all our hopes and dreams. It was one thing to enjoy Oprah as a TV personality, but it was obscene to elevate her to Magic Negress. Millions of Americans looked to Oprah to be told what to read, whom to vote for, what issues to care about, when to laugh, and when to weep, that is when she wasn’t doing what was she was best at: Interviewing vapid celebrities in love with their own vanity. Being fat, gross, and stupid, Oprah had no discernible talent of her own, but that was the hook with the audience. Most Americans are now fat, gross, and stupid, but they are obsessed with celebrity. When they look at Oprah, they see someone unseemly like themselves — fat, gross, and stupid — dillydallying with famous actors, singers, and athletes. Through Oprah, they also feel connected to the world of celebrity. Also, the fact that she’s ugly, black, and female means that her success is proof of the redemptive power of America. There was a time when someone like Oprah would have been a fat black mammy with kerchief on her head suckling some white kids on her big chocolate titties, but now, here she is with many billions of dollars. Only in America. Though Oprah is stupid, she’s been savvy enough to milk white tears of guilt and joy for all its worth(rather like Obama), with the help of Jews, of course.

And then, there was Jerry Springer and Maury Povich. If Oprah-ism was about elevation of a fat, gross, and stupid black woman as holy Magic Negress, what Springer and Povich did was reduce working class whites and blacks to the state of animals and savages. Now, there were always dumb, stupid, retarded, and trashy people in America. But American society had frowned upon such behavior.
The idea was that such people should watch BONANZA, THE WALTONS, BRADY BUNCH, and LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE and learn to be halfway decent. So, even if they had trashy tendencies, they shouldn’t wallow in them. They should be ashamed of their ways and at least try to raise their kids right so that the kids won’t end up like their stupid parents. But shows like Jerry Springer(in mainly targeting ‘white trash’) and Maury Povich(in mainly targeting ‘black trash’) sensationalized bad behavior into a shameless gladiatorial sport. Soon, entire families watched garbage like that together, and American turned into Amerika. Such shamelessness paved the way to the culture of EXTREMES. So, there were all these shows on TV that featured ‘extreme’ this, ‘extreme’ that, extreme anything. And then, there arose extreme sports where fighters do ugly things to one another. And then, even women were allowed into the sports, and they were bashing each other’s faces like demented chimpanzees.

Now, someone like Nikolas Cruz was born with an unfortunate set of genes. He looks goofy and was probably born funny-in-the-head. But if such a kid had grown up in a more traditional America with stronger sense of right-and-wrong, a sense of family and community, and a culture of shame-and-restraint, there would have been less chance of him turning out like this.
Of course, we can’t just blame the larger culture. Ultimately, Cruz has to face up to what he did as an individual and pay the price. But, our culture is really messed up. Now, I’m not saying all of us should be blamed. Oftentimes, those who blame themselves for what others did are virtue-signaling. Not all Americans played a role in degrading this country into a cultural and moral shithole. It is THOSE people who deserve most of the blame. The controllers of media. The radicals who spread poisonous ideas through the academia. Those who promoted drug culture and loose sex. Those who spread gambling and the idea that anything is justified by profits.

Be that as it may, Nikolas Cruz could only attack one school and destroy the lives of several people. As Hyman Roth said of Pantangeli in THE GODFATHER PART 2 , Cruz is ‘small potatoes’. https://youtu.be/UL6BdiaGaJ8?t=5m20s

What Cruz did is horrible and unforgivable, but it tore up only a local community. He was arrested, and he will have to face the music. He will likely receive the death penalty, surely something he deserves unless it can be proven that he’s seriously mentally ill.

Now, let’s move from small potato Cruz(who will soon fade from the news cycle) to the BIG POTATOES. Let’s look at neo-imperialist US that has destroyed not just random lives but entire nations. Yes, the national elites who condemn and bemoan what happened in Florida seem to be completely blind to their far greater crimes and bloodbaths all over the world.
So, why is the US so pathologically hypocritical and oblivious to what is plainly obvious, i.e. the US has been the main source of Evil around the world since the end of the Cold War?
It’s because the elites(especially the Zionist-globalists) are rabid with power-lust, paranoia, megalomania, resentment & vengeful angst, and contempt for the hoi polloi(both in the US and abroad); they spread lies through the worthless fake news media and engineer falsehoods in collusion with Deep State. Remember CIA and ‘slam dunk’ about Hussein’s WMD? The hubris, the arrogance, the sheer lack of concern for lives, and etc. The vile elites don’t care about American soldiers traumatized in wars and don’t care for the countless people who died, were maimed, or mentally destroyed in the Muslim World. With the elites acting like that, was anyone really surprised when Abu Gharib happened? From top to bottom, Americans have gotten used to the nihilist notion that they are above the law. You see, truth is just an ‘essentialist’ inconvenience. With creativity of spin and terminology, anyone can be made into a ‘New Hitler’ with WMD. And if Nikolas Cruz will be executed or spend the rest of his life behind bars, the globalist sociopaths who used lies to destroy entire nations, peoples, and cultures will do the what villains do in Akira Kuroawa's BAD SLEEP WELL. Hillary and Obama will not be brought to justice for what they did to Libya, Ukraine, and/or Syria. Hillary the mass murderer almost got to be president. Obama got a $60 million book deal. And all the Neocon Jewish globalists who goaded dumb George W. Bush into war in Iraq on false pretext are still not only free but rich and ensconced in seats of power and influence. And the movers and shakers that colluded with the Deep State to spread lies that led to Wars for Israel and New Cold War with Russia still control the media and spread lies all over. As for AIPAC goons who pressure the US to support Zionist imperialism in West Bank, they are invited to the biggest galas and showered with cash by oligarchs like Sheldon Adelson whose genius idea is that the US should drop a nuke on Iran, a nation without any nukes. As for Colin Powell who did his little act before the UN to push for Iraq War, he is still a respected statesman. When he had the chance to choose between integrity/courage and status/opportunism, he opted for the latter. In the end, his position in government mattered more than his moral compass, if he ever had any.

It isn't far-fetched to say that the Deep State, Media, Academia, and elite institutions are filled with more intelligent versions of Nikolas Cruz. They aren’t the types to stupidly go around shooting people, but then, they have bigger fish to fry: To take down entire nations and destroy millions of lives through death, disease, or trauma, and all based on lies to feed the insatiable hunger of this monster called globalism. The US, despite calling Putin a 'new hitler', wasn't averse to recruiting Neo-Nazis to bring down the regime in Ukraine. It shamelessly cooks up lies(like meth) to sustain a new Cold War with Russia, needlessly increasing tensions that may lead to an unnecessary war. (Unnecessary to sane sane people. But then, Deep State psychopaths don’t play by normal rules of decency, reciprocity, and limits. They play for power and more power, and for them, people around the world count for little more than humanity-as-‘fleas’ that Harry Lime sees up in the Ferris Wheel in THE THIRD MAN.) What other kinds of nastiness give the Deep State a hard on? Oh yeah, the taking down of Gaddafi and turning Libya into a total clusterfuc*. I recall Hillary laughing like a hyena at the lynching of Gaddafi. As for pathological egotist-narcissist Obama, he just shrugged his shoulders, smiled, and said , “Oops, my bad.” Destroying an entire nation was just a ‘mistake’, you see. And let’s not forget how the Deep State gave aid to terrorists and Jihadis to tear Syria apart in yet another great bloodbath of the 21st century, once again brought to you by the US and its allies. Priceless ancient treasures destroyed forever, and 400,000 people killed, and millions more uprooted. But who cares? The only concern among the elites in US media, academia, and Deep State is, “Is it good for Israel?” and "Is it good for US position in the Middle East?"

In status-centric globalist America where the elites no longer feel a national-humanist bond with the people, all that matters is their insatiable nihilist craving for power and position. To them, the whole world is just a violent video-game, the difference being that while gamers play in a world of fantasy, the Deep State plays in a world of reality with real people, millions of whom end up being killed, maimed, or soul-destroyed.

The Deep State scum are like the psychopath yuppie in AMERICAN PSYCHO. Sure, they talk the PC talk about ‘equality’ and ‘human rights’, but it’s all just smoke screen for their power games. These elites are so eager to be insiders and members of the Club that they will say or do anything to get in and stay in. Whether it’s Samantha Powers or John Bolton or Nikki Haley or John Yoo or any other bunch of scum-suckers, they are all a bunch of status-obsessed sociopaths whose only compass is whether the needle is pointing to Power.

And if you long for moral values and spiritual meaning in these times, just go worship the holy homo and make sure to convince yourself that Bruce Jenner is a ‘woman’. Ah, ‘rainbow’ in your eyes. It’s all lies upon lies.
As for you Negroes, never mind that you’re losing out due to globalism, mass immigration, and gentrification. Just watch the bling-movie BLACK PANTHER, make Jewish Hollywood even richer, and distract yourselves with the fantasy of Wakanda, sheeeeiiit. The elites find creative ways to push you out of cities while directing your gaze at bling heaven on the big screen for distraction. But then, what is the culture of blacks? Rap thuggery and ‘twerking’.

Fish rots from the head. We know from the bogus ‘Russiagate’ affair that the whole media complex and deep state are utterly corrupt and will go to any length to subvert Rule of Law and democracy. We know from Charlottesville that the Power will trample on the most fundamental American liberties to silence dissident voices. A completely legal assembly protected by the Constitution was shut down by the Power simply because it didn’t like the message. But the media, which are just part of the Deep State, just ran with the official narrative pushed by the Power.

US is now an empire of lies. Lies about the wonders of homosexuality and tranny nonsense, lies about BLM, lies about Russia as new ‘nazi nation’, lies about War on Terror(because it’s the US that’s actually allied with terrorists to wreck nations like Syria), lies about Iran, and etc. US has gotten so evil and demented that even a nutball regime of North Korea sometimes sounds rational in comparison.

We need a new nationalism, a real nationalism. The people of America and other nations need to come together and demand that the elites serve, lead, and guide the people. It must be a People Nationalism. A nation exists for the leaders to represent and serve the People. But the current elites of the US give the middle finger to Middle America and call for its replacement by endless tides of foreigners bribed with gibs. David Brooks, Max Boot, and Jennifer Rubin would never go on a killing spree like Nikolas Cruz, but if the likes of them get their way, Real America will have been murdered for good. You don’t have to actually kill people to kill a nation. Sufficient demographic changes will bury and erase a nation-that-had-been and replace it with something else. Jews didn’t kill a lot of Palestinians in the Nakba of 1948. There was no genocide in the sense of what happened in Ukraine or WWII. But Palestine as a nation was effectively murdered by massive demographic transformation. Israel was born because Palestine was murdered. And today, the Zionist-globalists are hellbent on murdering White, European, and Western nations via massive-invasion-immigration. Cruz shot up a school and killed 17 people. Jewish-Globalists plan to bulldoze White America & White Europe and replace them with Third World masses as their divide-and-rule helots. Cruz is indeed small potatoes.

In our time, is National Renewal even possible with the kind of leaders and elites we have whose soulless minds were molded by decades of degeneracy, decadence, and pseudo-intellectual PC garbage that reduces morality and ideology into empty slogans about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’ that can be twisted to mean just about ANYTHING? Too many Jewish elites are fueled by animus, hatred, contempt, and vengeful emotions vis-a-vis Muslims and white gentiles, though Jews are also working to destroy Japan by pressuring it to take in more ‘refugees’(even though Israel takes in none). For too many Jews, everything they don’t like in the world is boiled down to hysteria about Pogroms or WWII all over again, so much so that they are blind to the fact that their kind now constitute the New Power that is acting like the Russian imperialists and German warmongers of old.

Now, I’m not saying that if we have good elites and a culture of truth, there won’t be sickos like Nick Cruz. But he would be the exception in such a social order.
Why are there now so many instances of sociopaths like him acting as if they are above the law? One key reason is our culture is one of nihilism from the very top. The fact that Harvey Weinstein was able to get away with so much gross behavior while rubbing shoulders with the most powerful people in the world should tell you what kind of nation we are living in.

Granted, fish rots from the gut as well as from the head. The most corrupting gut-rot force in America has been blacks. Naturally savage and prone to psychopathy, they’ve given us a culture not of the mind and heart but of the fist, genitals, and butts. In the current year, the symbiotic alliance between elites minds and black butts have degraded culture beyond moral recognition not only in the US but around the world.

Lies have always been a part of America as in any other society. But now, lies have been institutionalized as the New Truth. Americans are so poisoned by lies that they are blind even to the ugliness of homo fecal penetration. Instead, they support massive homo parades, drape churches with homo colors, support ‘gay marriage’, and believe bakers ought to be destroyed for having moral courage. This is a sick sick society.

Libertarian types will say ‘homomania’ doesn’t kill people, but it murders something far more essential: Truth. Homomania murders the truth because it not only tells lies but canonizes lies as the holy truth. If the norm of a society is to murder truth in this manner, then the cancer of lies will grow and poison all of society.

It’s like what Merlin said: