Goy Politicians are like so many Gladiators bashing each other to the Delight of Jewish Supremacists — And there is no Spartacus among them, not one

In the movie SPARTACUS(dir. Stanley Kubrick), Kirk Douglas plays Spartacus who leads a slave rebellion against the Imperial Roman overlords. These men who were trained to fight and massacre one another for the amusement of the Romans decide the turn the tables on their masters. Instead of fighting each other, they commit to unite and fight together against the Romans to regain their freedom. Their dream is to return to their homelands, whence they were wrested to toil, fight, and die as slaves in Italy. In the end, the rebellion fails, but it was a noble struggle for justice, freedom, dignity, and pride. One thing the rebels understood was that, as long as they remained gladiators, they could never win while the Romans always won regardless. Gladiator A might kill Gladiator B, and Gladiator C might kill Gladiator A, and Gladiator S might slay Gladiator Q who destroyed Gladiator C. But in the end, all gladiators lose because they have no agency. They are forced to fight one another. They have no choice. Furthermore, they can never fight the Romans, the power that is oppressing them. If anything, they must fight others just like themselves — they are all slaves after all — while the Romans watch and cheer/jeer for entertainment value. They are no better off than dogs in dogfights or cocks in cockfights. They slaughter others in the same boat while the very people who are oppressing them reap all the rewards. The gladiatorial combat was the most brazen and vulgar form of divide-and-conquer. Romans captured slaves from various parts of their domain and made them fight one another. As a gladiator’s chance to live for another day hinged on his luck in the arena, the mindset of ‘better you than me’ prevailed, and slaves killed other slaves for the chance to live for another day. It was a most miserable lot.

We might think, that was then, this is now. But in a way, US politics is nothing but a contest of gladiators. For the most part, the various goyim among the Democrats and Republicans battle it out but mainly to win the approval, blessing, and support from the Jewish Masters. While Goy A will attack Goy B while Goy C attacks Goy D who attacks Goy A or B and so on, the fact is, even as they viciously lambaste one another, they all sheepishly suck up to their Jewish Masters.
If politics is essentially a struggle for power and if a liberal democracy is one where politicians, as representatives of the people, speak truth to power that must come under heightened scrutiny and criticism, that is certainly not political scenario in the US. In the US, the most powerful elites, the Jews, come under least criticism and inspection. They are allowed to use the Deep State to spread hateful wars against ‘enemies of Israel and Jews’. They are allowed to use the Fed to bail out Wall Street’s Jewish banksters. They are allowed to monopolize so-called ‘mainstream media’, Hollywood, and social platforms without anyone making a fuss.
Indeed, the US is now a nation where far more attention is directed toward total fictions like Russia-Collusion-Hoax and the threat of ‘white supremacists’, as if KKK and Neo-Nazis are hiding behind every corner and under every bed. While super-Jewish crooks in the State Department and Wall Street are allowed to get away with all kinds of shenanigans, the Power is directed at the imagined threat of ‘white nationalist terrorism’ or funnier stuff like ‘Neo-Nazis spreading Corona Virus among Orthodox Jews’. Congressional Hearings are never about Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, Israel’s support of ISIS, Jewish economic rape of Russia, Jewish pornification of culture, Jewish peddling of opioids to the white working class, SPLC’s scummy ties, AIPAC’s promotion of Jewish Supremacism, and ADL’s gangster operations to shut down free speech. Instead, most of the attention is directed at the least-heard group in America: Those who dare to speak truth to Jewish power and those who call for White Liberation from Jewish Perfidy, Hatred, Contempt, and Supremacism.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aF3hTDvlSL1V/

If the US were truly the Land of the Free, the various political groups, the two main political parties, and most politicians should be talking about Jewish Power and its Globo-Homo Agenda. Even as they disagree with one another on key issues, they should be UNITED against Jewish Power, especially as it's shown itself to be so venal, vicious, toxic, and corrupting. Culturally, economically, technologically, and politically, Jews have been poisoning the well of Western Civilization for some time. While Jews have higher IQ and have the ability to do great things for humanity — and indeed countless Jews have contributed much to civilization — , most of today’s Jews are mainly in it for greed, arrogance, contempt, sadism, hatred, paranoia, and supremacism. Jews are never straight with us, just like adults are hardly straight with children. But unlike adults who sometimes bend the truth for the good of the children(who can’t as yet handle the truth), Jews lie and lie to keep swindling, robbing, and corrupting us. Jews know that the poor man’s ONLY advantages vis-a-vis the rich man are numbers and morality. There are many more regular folks than rich elites. And that's why Jews need to bring in Diversity so that the masses will be divided. Also, even those with little or nothing can possess moral wealth/capital and use it effectively against the rich who got the money but not necessarily moral capital. Look what happened to the Cuban elites who had lots of money but no moral dignity. They were swept aside by the Revolution. Indeed, it is the one ace card that George Bailey has against Mr. Potter in IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE. Potter is a lot richer than Bailey, but people respect Bailey because he’s a good guy. And Bailey stands up for the people because they’re decent folks and upright citizens. The people of Bedford Falls have moral capital whereas the people of hypothetical Pottersville do not. Jews are like Potter in that they fear Moral Capital among the goy have-nots and have-lesses. When a poor man with dignity and morality speaks up for justice, his words carry weight. But if a poor man has tattoos & piercings, raises his daughter like a hooker, has a son hooked on drugs, and has a skanky wife or girlfriend who acts like a guest on the JERRY SPRINGER SHOW, he has no moral capital and no respect. This is why Jews have sought to Potter-ize America. It’s not only because Vice Industries controlled by Jews are highly profitable but because the infestation by vice-lice robs the masses of have-nots of the dignity and moral pride they once possessed. The Joad Family in THE GRAPES OF WRATH have moral capital even though they’ve lost everything. But imagine Mama Joad with a nose ring and Papa Joad with an ass-tattoo. Imagine Tom Joad as a meth addict, and Ruthie Joad as a skankass whore-wanna-be. Indeed, capitalists not only seek to profit from mass vulgarity but rob the masses of moral pride that comes with restraint, sobriety, and maturity. In current America, how can we take any moral cause seriously when everything’s about wrong-and-wrong than right-or-wrong? How can we choose between Pussyhats and Lady Maga? It’s all a sad joke.


Now, it would be ridiculous to pretend that it’s all about Jews vs Goyim. Even if Jews were to vanish off the planet, goyim will have plenty of problems. Even in homogeneous nations untouched by Jewish influence, there are tons of corruption, abuse, and tyranny. Various factions of Muslims slaughtered each other without Jewish influence. Protestants and Catholics in Europe slaughtered each other of their own accord. It wasn’t Jews who forced Adolf Hitler to invade Russia. And so on. So, we must reject Utopian Antisemitism that assumes that the world will be put to right if we just deal with the Jews. Even among themselves, goyim will always have plenty of problems as life is problematic. And yet, it’d be just as stupid to pretend that Jewish Power does NOT play a disproportionate role in the demise of the West. Jews are immensely powerful, and the bulk of Jewish Power is hostile, paranoid, contemptuous, vengeful, and vicious when it comes to goyim. Jews bitch about the history of antisemitism, but Jews have had even a longer history of goy-mockery and goy-defamation. It is incontestable that Jews have spread gambling far and wide across the US. What is gambling but a form of organized mass theft? There is no doubt that Jews have orchestrated collusion between Wall Street and Washington to rig the system in favor of super-rich Jewish oligarchs. There is no doubt that Jews have played a key role in the pornification of popular culture, especially by spreading skanky harlotry among white girls whom Jewish men regard as sexual commodities.
Jewish feminists have long bitched about how MEN objectify women, but this was never a problem in the Christian West that, if anything, placed women on a pedestal. Such objectification of women, especially white women, has been spearheaded by Jews who were the leading agents of prostitution and pornography in both US and Europe — and in Israel, Jewish pimp-gangsters imported thousands of white Slavic women to be used as sex slaves for non-white men. Such is the history of race-mixing. Sordid and vile. If Jewish feminists are so opposed to the objectification of women, why are they so silent about Jewish men in entertainment turning white women into sexual commodities? It’s because Jewish Feminists are Jews first and feminists second. Jewish feminists have even lionized Marilyn Monroe, the 'shikse' whore whose entire career revolved around sucking Jewish cock. Indeed, Jewish Feminism, like Jewish anything-else, was really a means to boost and consolidate Jewish Power. Especially as Jewish women are insanely envious of ‘Aryan’ beauty, they take special delight in white girls being reduced to skanks who mate with Negro men and produce children with flat noses, fat lips, and nappy hair. Thus, white women produce kids that are even funnier-looking than Gabe Caplan and Eddie Deezen.
What was the main thrust of Jewish Feminism? It was to drive a wedge between white men and white women. Once white women were made to see white men as the ENEMY — notice all those Rape Narratives are about Blond Aryan Fratboys violating white girls, the kind pushed by the hideous Sabrina Rubin Erderly, even though the biggest rapists in the US are blacks, followed by illegal invaders — , Jewish men then worked on white women to turn them into skanks who should go with Jewish men or black men. Thus, white women went from comrades of white men to commodities of Jewish and black men.

Anyway, a healthy democracy must be focused on the power. It must be honest about the character and nature of that power not only in terms of its political machinations and economic impact but ethnic bias and elitist prejudices. There is no doubt that the current power is not only heavily Jewish but heavily CONSCIOUSLY Jewish. In other words, the men and women of power are not simply Americans with Jewish backgrounds who work for the common good but are, first and foremost, JEWISH-ZIONIST GLOBALISTS who use America for their own ethnic aggrandizement and enrichment. Jews are so rich and can pay out of their own pockets to aid Israel, but Jews force the US government to send goy tax dollars. It’s not only because Jews are stingy. Jews know that, even if the US government withdraws every last penny of aid to Israel, Jews worldwide have more than enough to shower Israel with gazillions. Then, why do Jews insist that the US government keep giving aid to Israel? The main reason is political than economic. It is to reinforce the message to ALL Americans that they must serve the US government that serves the Jews. You see, that is as American as apple pie... or bagel & cream cheese.
With such a risible elite ruling over us, sensible Americans expect their politicians to stand up to Jewish supremacist arrogance & contempt and do what is good for most Americans who are goyim. Alas, the Jewish Master class not only controls the media — though a tool of communication, the mass media are used to suppress key information and shut down honest debate than to facilitate free flow of facts and ideas to raise awareness about the true nature of power in America and the World — but used their money power like gangsters to make an offer that the goy politicians couldn’t refuse. Jews hold a gun to every politician and demands that he sign a pledge to Israel and AIPAC... or else... they will fund another candidate who will get favorable coverage from the Jew-run media. Thus, just about every goy politician comes to be owned by Jews. Even when a somewhat courageous and principled goy politician goes against Jewish power and interests, he or she can never mention the Jew. Tulsi Gabbard opposed the Jew-guided US imperialism in Syria, but she never mentioned that Jews were behind it. So, even dissenting politicians just blame Big Oil, the Military-Industrial Complex, Money-in-Politics, and etc. but fail to mention the Jews. And in rare instances when people do blame Zionists, it's usually the Christian Zionists. According to mendacious Jews and craven faux-dissidents, the reason why the US foreign policy is so skewed toward Israel and against Palestinians is because of crazed Evangelicals and Fundamentalists who forbid Jews from making peace with Palestinians. These dummy Fundies cannot even stop ‘gay marriage’, but they somehow control the US foreign policy. In truth, clowns like Pompeo and John Bolton go with crazy Philo-Zionism because they're totally owned by Jews.

With all such politicians, bureaucrats, and appointees being controlled by Jews directly or indirectly, they are little more than slaves. And their politics is just gladiatorial blood-sport. It’s goy dogs barking and biting at other goy dogs. It wouldn’t be so bad if goy dogs barked at Jewish dogs as well, but Jews are not dogs in the American Political Equation. They are the masters, and so goy dogs are not allowed to bark at them. And that means, US politics is utterly worthless. If two dogs in the household bark at each other for the master's affection and doggy biscuits, they get to decide NOTHING. No matter which dog out-barks or out-bites which dog, the master is fully in control of the house.
And that is why US politics must change from one of gladiatorial sports to slave rebellion. While various goyim have their differences and conflict-of-interests, they must all seek liberation from the Jew. They must unite like the gladiators in SPARTACUS who, for a time, threatened the might of Rome. Of course, this is easier said than done because Jews have been master strategists who play politics like a chess game. Jews know white power has been the defining determinant in American History, and so, it had to be checkmated first. Jews pinned down all white advantages. Thus, white pride has been paralyzed by white guilt. If whites try to make a move against mass-immigration-invasion, they are attacked by charges of ‘xenophobia’. If whites say Jews are behind Diversity-as-weapon-against-whiteness, Jews attack with charges of ‘antisemitism’. If whites bring up the issue of black crime and pathology, they are attacked by charges of ‘racism’. Also, the white king and queen have been separated and trapped accordingly. Every move that whites might make have been foreseen and forestalled by Jewish strategy.

Also, Jews are so rich and/or powerful that they’ve been able to buy off entire swaths of the goyim with gifts and bribery while threatening others with destruction. Of course, much of Jewish bribery is done with white money and wealth than with Jewish Money. For instance, when Jews bring over tons of foreigners and dump them on some white community, it’s white goyim who must pay. Jews take the credit for their ‘compassion’ but the buck is passed onto whites who must deal with Somalis in Ohio and Minnesota. For many non-white goyim around the world, their main dream is to come to the West for insta-material-improvement, and that means they will work with globalists against the native population. But Jews have also divided the white community by using carrots and sticks to control white elites who today are little more than comprador cucks like Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, and the Bush Family who can’t remind white folks enough that it’s so very wonderful for them to become minorities in their own nations like US, Canada, Australia, and all of Europe. White comprador elites know their position and privilege are incumbent on sucking up to Jewish super-elites and saying the kind of stuff Jews want to hear. But there are also plenty of white ‘idiologists’ — idiotic ideologists — who’ve stupidly bought into the White Guilt Narrative and believe it’s the obligation of whites to repent for their historical sins by sucking up to Jews, blacks, and Diversity. (If white guilt in the US were genuine and true, white people would feel most guilty about the American Indians and do their utmost to revive the Native-Indigenous community. But white morality lacks agency and autonomy. It isn't the product of deep white reflection on history but whatever theme was programmed into white minds by Jews who control media and academia. Incredibly enough, even though it was mass immigration of whites that destroyed native-indigenous cultures and tribes, white people ignore the dark side of immigration and regard it as the greatest good; furthermore, they feel they owe something to folks around the world whose lands whites didn't take. According to current 'white morality' cooked up by Jews, America owes more to Asian-Indians than to American-Indians. This goes to show white morality is really a sham. It's a matter of whites wanting to feel holier-than-thou about something and outsourcing the moral themes to Jews who concoct whatever to their own tribal advantage. Since Jewish American Identity is tied to immigration and because Diversity weakens goyim with divide-and-rule opportunity for Jews, mass-immigration has been of late been promoted as the Greatest Moral Good.) As people are naturally superiorist to some extent and as whites aren’t allowed to feel superior in terms of identity, they seek feelings of superiority via virtue-signaling, i.e. if whites can’t say they’re better than non-whites, they can still say they’re better than OTHER whites who aren’t sufficiently ‘woke’ or with the program. And of course, Jews have driven a wedge between goy men and goy women via feminism, male infantilism, and the spread of skank culture. Such divisions among goyim are to Jews what manure is to maggots. Jews feed on that stuff and get fat. https://www.bitchute.com/video/WbLaLUcvxIha/

This is why the goy world needs truly inspired leaders of all stripes in all fields to spread the truth about Jewish supremacist perfidy so that America and the West can have True Politics once again. Not one of slave gladiators bashing each other in deference to the master caste but one of free men and women who dare to speak truth to power and to wield the hammer of justice against any individual or group that dares to violate norms of decency and abuse power & privilege for its own self-aggrandizement. In 2016, many foolishly saw Donald Trump as a Spartacus-like figure, and that’s why they stood by him during the years of Russia Collusion Hoax, but it turns out Trump is just another dog. Despite all the anti-Trump hatred of the Jews, all he did was suck up to Jews. He is a dog, not a man, like the rest of goy politicians. Jews accuse Trump of ‘white supremacism’, but Trump hasn't lifted a finger to aid White Liberation and, if anything, has enabled Jewish oligarchs in Big Tech and Big Finance to shut down white people who dare speak the truth. Of course, vile Jews defame White Liberation as ‘white supremacist’ or ‘neo-nazi’, and it is about time white liberationists shot back and pointed out that Jews are now the Judeo-Nazis or ‘Jewzis’ because their gangster-fascism now robs the world and ravages humanity.

Nikolas Cruz Is Small Potatoes Compared to Big Time Sociopaths who Destroy Entire Nations

The Florida School shooting adds yet another bloodbath to the long and depressing tally of individuals going loco and randomly killing people. Many critics blame guns, but guns don’t kill people by themselves. Why has there been a spate of such killings since the Columbine incident? Some might argue that the media are to blame for ‘sensationalizing’ these murders with extensive coverage.
While most sane people care about their good name, the crazy ‘losers’ might crave fame and notoriety instead. While it’s natural for people to be liked and admired, what about those who have no such hope? The ones who are ugly, dumb, or just plain unappealing? If likable and talented people attract the right kind of attention, the unlikable and unappealing either get no attention or get the wrong kind of attention: Mockery, bullying, ridicule, rejection, contempt. Now, most people, even if disliked and ignored, learn to accept their lot in life. They find ways to cope and adapt, and in time, they even find people with whom they can form a community of friends and family.
However, certain people aren’t only disliked but troubled and demented due to traumatic child-rearing or genetic reasons. Granted, likable people can be crazy too. Ted Bundy is possibly the most famous case. He was a reasonably good-looking guy with smarts. He held a nice job and had no trouble meeting women. But he became a serial rapist-and-murderer. Still, sick people who are attractive or smart are less likely to end up like Nikolas Cruz. They have more of an incentive to live within bounds because they have something to lose. An attractive person may lose friends and lovers. A smart rich guy may lose his fortune and privilege. Thus, the attractive or smart people with sick souls do what is necessary to remain respectable and find more creative ways to indulge their sickness, like the Podesta brothers.
But if someone is crazy, ugly, and dumb, he has nothing to lose if he were to embark on a horrible act. If anything, they might finally gain the attention that had been missing all their lives.

Things are worse for troubled youth like Nicholas Cruz because there aren’t any moral norms anymore. What passes for right-and-wrong are PC posturing on current issues, gender issues, foreign policy, and historical narratives. Whatever meaning such subjects may have on the nation or the world, it means nothing to the personal life of a young boy. Children need a solid foundation in family life & community and a sense of culture that provides deeper meaning & sense of morality that is relevant to one’s personal existence. After all, ideology or political positions themselves do not secure a stable and meaningful existence for a child. Suppose a child is raised in a family with all the fashionable PC values. The adults that move in and out of the house are all for ‘gay marriage’, ‘trannies in the ladies room’, ‘new cold war with Russia’, ‘hating Trump’, ‘anti-racism’, ‘interracial sex’, and ‘climate change’ legislation. But suppose the adults don’t act like responsible parents or guardians, there’s no discipline(or if such exists, it’s brutal and arbitrary, thus only traumatizing the child) in the home, cultural experience is composed of watching trash on TV & playing ugly video games(and pornified music videos), and no teaching of fundamental right-and-wrongs when it comes to personal virtues such as honesty, propriety, dignity, and due diligence.
This rule applies to conservatives too. Even if the parents are ‘good Christians’ in ideas and values, if they fail to act like responsible adults in instilling their children with proper mindset and attitudes, the kids may grow up all wrong.
Now, generally speaking, conservative values & ideology are more useful in instilling the right kinds of values in children than liberal values & ideology are. This is because conservatism is more grounded in a culture of responsibility, duty, and discipline. Before kids can learn to be free, they need to be molded into young adults with core virtues. Liberalism has great value as a mode of open-mindedness, inquisitiveness, curiosity, and progress. Liberalism is more free-spirited than conservatism, and that can be a good thing. But unless freedom is grounded in respect, discipline, honor, and experience, it has a tendency to become aimless, decadent, and confused. It’s like an athlete isn’t going to get anywhere just by running like a crazy headless chicken no matter how fast or strong he is. He has to respect the coach, learn to take orders, cooperate with others, and train to gain the necessary skills. An athlete will eventually have to learn to be free and find his own footing in the sport, but he has to follow a path that leads gradually from obedience and discipline to ability and agency.
In the past, even American liberalism was grounded in conservative modes and values. Liberal Education didn’t mean you got to do whatever you wanted or blind yourself to everything except the latest fashionable dogma. Rather, you learned from professors with credentials and experience. You learned from the greatest thinkers, scientists, and artists in history. Even if you found the elders' teachings and methods less than ideal, you built upon their knowledge and appreciated their efforts in their time.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt is considered as the greatest liberal president of the 20th century, but he had many conservative concerns about the New Deal. He worried about the potentially negative impact welfare may have on families. It’s doubtful that he would have endorsed the Great Society programs of the 1960s that went about rewarding teenage girls for being pregnant out of wedlock. The New Deal was about lending support to families with solid moral values and to men who wanted to work. America back then had a great sense of shame. New Deal was about offering aid to men and women of virtue who’d fallen on hard times. It was not, as would be the case with Great Society and other programs that followed, the reckless abandonment of culture of responsibility and the soulless rewarding of bad behavior, especially among young black women.
A lot of ‘progressives’ tend to place all the burden of social betterment on rich people and the government — rich should pay more taxes and government should provide more programs — , but the ‘national character’ of a people matter in the outcomes. Indeed, it is THE most decisive factor in the success or failure of nations or communities. Why did Europeans do so much with Marshall Plan while no amount of foreign aid does anything for black Africa or Detroit? What happened to all the money poured into black communities all across America? Why do some nations that receive less foreign aid to better than those who received so much?
And even in Europe, why is there more bang for the government buck among Swedes than among Southern Italians? Despite the current demise of Sweden(entirely due to liberalism-gone-pathological), it was a nice nation for much of the 20th century because most Swedes had civic virtues of diligence, honesty, responsibility, and work ethic. And whatever the ideology, left or right, most Swedes knew how to keep order in the house through proper parenting. As such, most Swedes believed that one should work hard, pay taxes, and take only what is necessary and due from the government. So, there was a culture of give and take between the state and the people. But in Southern Italy, the sheer lack of national character means a lot of people are shameless about lying, cheating, stealing, and acting like the cast of characters in GOODFELLAS.
So, anyone who’d say something like "Southern Italy is backward because the government doesn’t provide the kind of services available in Sweden" is missing the point. Swedes have civic virtue that is taught in every home. (If anything, Sweden’s current problem of Diversity is the result of its virtue of trust & cooperation having been projected onto the whole world. Just because Swedes made a little paradise for themselves, they naively got to thinking that the Swedish model could save the world. And if Swedes failed in exporting their model to African nations, maybe Africans can be made Swedish-like via immigration. In the past, such naive idealism was tempered by rational race-ism that informed most Swedes, even those on the Left, that the races are different, and therefore, most Africans could never be made into nice Swedes. But the rise of PC ideology forbade such rational & sane thinking and replaced it with the reckless conviction that any bunch of African ‘groids’ could be turned into good Swedes. But then, there was another reason for the embrace of Diversity. If one reason was naively idealistic and pro-civilization — the hope of elevating lowly & primitive Africans to the status of advanced Europeans — , the other reason was primitivist. Even though or precisely because Sweden was so nice and orderly, many Swedes grew bored with modernity and civilization. They craved the heat of Afro-jungle boogie-woogie of Afro-pop and American black music. Especially Swedish women developed jungle fever and wanted to have sex with black men and welcome ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. So, the combination of naive idealism and lusty primitivism will destroy Sweden, a nation so far gone that it cannot be saved.)

Anyway, ideologies are about big things. Parenting is not about ideology or big ideas. Whether parents are communist, fascist, Jewish, Catholic, Mormon, Muslim, atheist, socialist, or whatever, there are fundamental rules that apply to ALL families in the proper rearing of children. Kids need love and affection. Kids need discipline and a basic sense of right and wrong, e.g. "Do not steal", "Don’t lie", "Don’t be discourteous", "Don’t kick the dog", "Don’t bully other kids", "love thy parents", and etc. And for kids to grow up with right values, parents have to be mature adults. But is that possible anymore? With the cult of everlasting youth, we have old people who still act like kids. It won’t be long before we have rappers who are 60 yrs old. We see tattoos and piercings among adults all over. What kind of message is that to kids, to grow up in a family where your own parents are marked with ugliness all over their bodies? In the past, the Church used to provide the family with a sense of community with other folks and sense of continuity with the past and tradition. But what are churches nowadays? Many have closed, some are Evangelical nuthouses whose main message is "Muh Israel" and "Nuke Iran" while Mainline churches are about little more than "Muh holy homo". And the Catholic Church is all about "Muh refugees" or "Muh Illegal Immigrants". It’s all about helping Other peoples but offer nothing to the rooted or existing community. It preserves nothing of tradition in terms of demographic & culture and only seeks to replace the existing faithful with waves of foreigners, immigrants, or illegals. If anything, Diversity made things much worse. Even in affluent communities, diversity tends to undermine a sense of togetherness. When American cities used to be divided along ethnic lines, the Irish in Irish town, Italians in Italian town, and Poles in Polish town had a sense of their own ethnic community. It’s like how Mike Royko used to remember how people in his neighborhood, many of them of shared ethnicity, would to all come out and celebrate Fourth of July together. Especially damaging was feminism because, even in a world of Diversity, there can be the core foundation of family within the home at least. Even if a Pole marries an Italian, there is at least the family, father and mother to raise the child. And for a child, nothing is more important than the unity of man and woman as his parents who are committed to one another and to their children. So, even in a world of ethnic and racial strangers, a child can feel whole and part of an organic unit if he has father and mother. But feminism drove a wedge between this most essential of unions. It encouraged too many women to see men as The Enemy or filled women with the idea that they can raise children alone without the men who should just come and go into their lives as ‘boyfriends’. This had a totally toxic impact on society, but most critics, even conservatives, are loathe to say this because the demented feminist-dominant ideology deems such sane views as ‘misogynist’.

Also, the rise of electronic media meant the erasure of community in many parts of America. In the past, if people in a local community needed the news, they got together in the town square to chat. Or they gathered together at rallies or meetings. It’s like how people act in MEET JOHN DOE and IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE. But with the rise of TV and electronic media, people can just sit home and get all the news and information. Now, it wouldn’t be so bad if every locality had more autonomy over its own media. But in fact, most of what is beamed to every community, big or small, in the US, is controlled by a handful of conglomerates, all of which are owned and/or controlled by Jewish globalists whose idea of the highest virtue is Homomania.
Worse, the increasing crassness and vulgarity of American culture has made Americans far more shameless. In the 70s, a talk show was something like Phil Donahue. But by the 80s, it was turning into something like Oprah and Jerry Springer. Both were corrosive in their own way. Oprah went from just another talkshow host to an object of worship. This shameless and self-aggrandizing fat black woman was supposed to represent all our hopes and dreams. It was one thing to enjoy Oprah as a TV personality, but it was obscene to elevate her to Magic Negress. Millions of Americans looked to Oprah to be told what to read, whom to vote for, what issues to care about, when to laugh, and when to weep, that is when she wasn’t doing what was she was best at: Interviewing vapid celebrities in love with their own vanity. Being fat, gross, and stupid, Oprah had no discernible talent of her own, but that was the hook with the audience. Most Americans are now fat, gross, and stupid, but they are obsessed with celebrity. When they look at Oprah, they see someone unseemly like themselves — fat, gross, and stupid — dillydallying with famous actors, singers, and athletes. Through Oprah, they also feel connected to the world of celebrity. Also, the fact that she’s ugly, black, and female means that her success is proof of the redemptive power of America. There was a time when someone like Oprah would have been a fat black mammy with kerchief on her head suckling some white kids on her big chocolate titties, but now, here she is with many billions of dollars. Only in America. Though Oprah is stupid, she’s been savvy enough to milk white tears of guilt and joy for all its worth(rather like Obama), with the help of Jews, of course.

And then, there was Jerry Springer and Maury Povich. If Oprah-ism was about elevation of a fat, gross, and stupid black woman as holy Magic Negress, what Springer and Povich did was reduce working class whites and blacks to the state of animals and savages. Now, there were always dumb, stupid, retarded, and trashy people in America. But American society had frowned upon such behavior.
The idea was that such people should watch BONANZA, THE WALTONS, BRADY BUNCH, and LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE and learn to be halfway decent. So, even if they had trashy tendencies, they shouldn’t wallow in them. They should be ashamed of their ways and at least try to raise their kids right so that the kids won’t end up like their stupid parents. But shows like Jerry Springer(in mainly targeting ‘white trash’) and Maury Povich(in mainly targeting ‘black trash’) sensationalized bad behavior into a shameless gladiatorial sport. Soon, entire families watched garbage like that together, and American turned into Amerika. Such shamelessness paved the way to the culture of EXTREMES. So, there were all these shows on TV that featured ‘extreme’ this, ‘extreme’ that, extreme anything. And then, there arose extreme sports where fighters do ugly things to one another. And then, even women were allowed into the sports, and they were bashing each other’s faces like demented chimpanzees.

Now, someone like Nikolas Cruz was born with an unfortunate set of genes. He looks goofy and was probably born funny-in-the-head. But if such a kid had grown up in a more traditional America with stronger sense of right-and-wrong, a sense of family and community, and a culture of shame-and-restraint, there would have been less chance of him turning out like this.
Of course, we can’t just blame the larger culture. Ultimately, Cruz has to face up to what he did as an individual and pay the price. But, our culture is really messed up. Now, I’m not saying all of us should be blamed. Oftentimes, those who blame themselves for what others did are virtue-signaling. Not all Americans played a role in degrading this country into a cultural and moral shithole. It is THOSE people who deserve most of the blame. The controllers of media. The radicals who spread poisonous ideas through the academia. Those who promoted drug culture and loose sex. Those who spread gambling and the idea that anything is justified by profits.

Be that as it may, Nikolas Cruz could only attack one school and destroy the lives of several people. As Hyman Roth said of Pantangeli in THE GODFATHER PART 2 , Cruz is ‘small potatoes’. https://youtu.be/UL6BdiaGaJ8?t=5m20s

What Cruz did is horrible and unforgivable, but it tore up only a local community. He was arrested, and he will have to face the music. He will likely receive the death penalty, surely something he deserves unless it can be proven that he’s seriously mentally ill.

Now, let’s move from small potato Cruz(who will soon fade from the news cycle) to the BIG POTATOES. Let’s look at neo-imperialist US that has destroyed not just random lives but entire nations. Yes, the national elites who condemn and bemoan what happened in Florida seem to be completely blind to their far greater crimes and bloodbaths all over the world.
So, why is the US so pathologically hypocritical and oblivious to what is plainly obvious, i.e. the US has been the main source of Evil around the world since the end of the Cold War?
It’s because the elites(especially the Zionist-globalists) are rabid with power-lust, paranoia, megalomania, resentment & vengeful angst, and contempt for the hoi polloi(both in the US and abroad); they spread lies through the worthless fake news media and engineer falsehoods in collusion with Deep State. Remember CIA and ‘slam dunk’ about Hussein’s WMD? The hubris, the arrogance, the sheer lack of concern for lives, and etc. The vile elites don’t care about American soldiers traumatized in wars and don’t care for the countless people who died, were maimed, or mentally destroyed in the Muslim World. With the elites acting like that, was anyone really surprised when Abu Gharib happened? From top to bottom, Americans have gotten used to the nihilist notion that they are above the law. You see, truth is just an ‘essentialist’ inconvenience. With creativity of spin and terminology, anyone can be made into a ‘New Hitler’ with WMD. And if Nikolas Cruz will be executed or spend the rest of his life behind bars, the globalist sociopaths who used lies to destroy entire nations, peoples, and cultures will do the what villains do in Akira Kuroawa's BAD SLEEP WELL. Hillary and Obama will not be brought to justice for what they did to Libya, Ukraine, and/or Syria. Hillary the mass murderer almost got to be president. Obama got a $60 million book deal. And all the Neocon Jewish globalists who goaded dumb George W. Bush into war in Iraq on false pretext are still not only free but rich and ensconced in seats of power and influence. And the movers and shakers that colluded with the Deep State to spread lies that led to Wars for Israel and New Cold War with Russia still control the media and spread lies all over. As for AIPAC goons who pressure the US to support Zionist imperialism in West Bank, they are invited to the biggest galas and showered with cash by oligarchs like Sheldon Adelson whose genius idea is that the US should drop a nuke on Iran, a nation without any nukes. As for Colin Powell who did his little act before the UN to push for Iraq War, he is still a respected statesman. When he had the chance to choose between integrity/courage and status/opportunism, he opted for the latter. In the end, his position in government mattered more than his moral compass, if he ever had any.

It isn't far-fetched to say that the Deep State, Media, Academia, and elite institutions are filled with more intelligent versions of Nikolas Cruz. They aren’t the types to stupidly go around shooting people, but then, they have bigger fish to fry: To take down entire nations and destroy millions of lives through death, disease, or trauma, and all based on lies to feed the insatiable hunger of this monster called globalism. The US, despite calling Putin a 'new hitler', wasn't averse to recruiting Neo-Nazis to bring down the regime in Ukraine. It shamelessly cooks up lies(like meth) to sustain a new Cold War with Russia, needlessly increasing tensions that may lead to an unnecessary war. (Unnecessary to sane sane people. But then, Deep State psychopaths don’t play by normal rules of decency, reciprocity, and limits. They play for power and more power, and for them, people around the world count for little more than humanity-as-‘fleas’ that Harry Lime sees up in the Ferris Wheel in THE THIRD MAN.) What other kinds of nastiness give the Deep State a hard on? Oh yeah, the taking down of Gaddafi and turning Libya into a total clusterfuc*. I recall Hillary laughing like a hyena at the lynching of Gaddafi. As for pathological egotist-narcissist Obama, he just shrugged his shoulders, smiled, and said , “Oops, my bad.” Destroying an entire nation was just a ‘mistake’, you see. And let’s not forget how the Deep State gave aid to terrorists and Jihadis to tear Syria apart in yet another great bloodbath of the 21st century, once again brought to you by the US and its allies. Priceless ancient treasures destroyed forever, and 400,000 people killed, and millions more uprooted. But who cares? The only concern among the elites in US media, academia, and Deep State is, “Is it good for Israel?” and "Is it good for US position in the Middle East?"

In status-centric globalist America where the elites no longer feel a national-humanist bond with the people, all that matters is their insatiable nihilist craving for power and position. To them, the whole world is just a violent video-game, the difference being that while gamers play in a world of fantasy, the Deep State plays in a world of reality with real people, millions of whom end up being killed, maimed, or soul-destroyed.

The Deep State scum are like the psychopath yuppie in AMERICAN PSYCHO. Sure, they talk the PC talk about ‘equality’ and ‘human rights’, but it’s all just smoke screen for their power games. These elites are so eager to be insiders and members of the Club that they will say or do anything to get in and stay in. Whether it’s Samantha Powers or John Bolton or Nikki Haley or John Yoo or any other bunch of scum-suckers, they are all a bunch of status-obsessed sociopaths whose only compass is whether the needle is pointing to Power.

And if you long for moral values and spiritual meaning in these times, just go worship the holy homo and make sure to convince yourself that Bruce Jenner is a ‘woman’. Ah, ‘rainbow’ in your eyes. It’s all lies upon lies.
As for you Negroes, never mind that you’re losing out due to globalism, mass immigration, and gentrification. Just watch the bling-movie BLACK PANTHER, make Jewish Hollywood even richer, and distract yourselves with the fantasy of Wakanda, sheeeeiiit. The elites find creative ways to push you out of cities while directing your gaze at bling heaven on the big screen for distraction. But then, what is the culture of blacks? Rap thuggery and ‘twerking’.

Fish rots from the head. We know from the bogus ‘Russiagate’ affair that the whole media complex and deep state are utterly corrupt and will go to any length to subvert Rule of Law and democracy. We know from Charlottesville that the Power will trample on the most fundamental American liberties to silence dissident voices. A completely legal assembly protected by the Constitution was shut down by the Power simply because it didn’t like the message. But the media, which are just part of the Deep State, just ran with the official narrative pushed by the Power.

US is now an empire of lies. Lies about the wonders of homosexuality and tranny nonsense, lies about BLM, lies about Russia as new ‘nazi nation’, lies about War on Terror(because it’s the US that’s actually allied with terrorists to wreck nations like Syria), lies about Iran, and etc. US has gotten so evil and demented that even a nutball regime of North Korea sometimes sounds rational in comparison.

We need a new nationalism, a real nationalism. The people of America and other nations need to come together and demand that the elites serve, lead, and guide the people. It must be a People Nationalism. A nation exists for the leaders to represent and serve the People. But the current elites of the US give the middle finger to Middle America and call for its replacement by endless tides of foreigners bribed with gibs. David Brooks, Max Boot, and Jennifer Rubin would never go on a killing spree like Nikolas Cruz, but if the likes of them get their way, Real America will have been murdered for good. You don’t have to actually kill people to kill a nation. Sufficient demographic changes will bury and erase a nation-that-had-been and replace it with something else. Jews didn’t kill a lot of Palestinians in the Nakba of 1948. There was no genocide in the sense of what happened in Ukraine or WWII. But Palestine as a nation was effectively murdered by massive demographic transformation. Israel was born because Palestine was murdered. And today, the Zionist-globalists are hellbent on murdering White, European, and Western nations via massive-invasion-immigration. Cruz shot up a school and killed 17 people. Jewish-Globalists plan to bulldoze White America & White Europe and replace them with Third World masses as their divide-and-rule helots. Cruz is indeed small potatoes.

In our time, is National Renewal even possible with the kind of leaders and elites we have whose soulless minds were molded by decades of degeneracy, decadence, and pseudo-intellectual PC garbage that reduces morality and ideology into empty slogans about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’ that can be twisted to mean just about ANYTHING? Too many Jewish elites are fueled by animus, hatred, contempt, and vengeful emotions vis-a-vis Muslims and white gentiles, though Jews are also working to destroy Japan by pressuring it to take in more ‘refugees’(even though Israel takes in none). For too many Jews, everything they don’t like in the world is boiled down to hysteria about Pogroms or WWII all over again, so much so that they are blind to the fact that their kind now constitute the New Power that is acting like the Russian imperialists and German warmongers of old.

Now, I’m not saying that if we have good elites and a culture of truth, there won’t be sickos like Nick Cruz. But he would be the exception in such a social order.
Why are there now so many instances of sociopaths like him acting as if they are above the law? One key reason is our culture is one of nihilism from the very top. The fact that Harvey Weinstein was able to get away with so much gross behavior while rubbing shoulders with the most powerful people in the world should tell you what kind of nation we are living in.

Granted, fish rots from the gut as well as from the head. The most corrupting gut-rot force in America has been blacks. Naturally savage and prone to psychopathy, they’ve given us a culture not of the mind and heart but of the fist, genitals, and butts. In the current year, the symbiotic alliance between elites minds and black butts have degraded culture beyond moral recognition not only in the US but around the world.

Lies have always been a part of America as in any other society. But now, lies have been institutionalized as the New Truth. Americans are so poisoned by lies that they are blind even to the ugliness of homo fecal penetration. Instead, they support massive homo parades, drape churches with homo colors, support ‘gay marriage’, and believe bakers ought to be destroyed for having moral courage. This is a sick sick society.

Libertarian types will say ‘homomania’ doesn’t kill people, but it murders something far more essential: Truth. Homomania murders the truth because it not only tells lies but canonizes lies as the holy truth. If the norm of a society is to murder truth in this manner, then the cancer of lies will grow and poison all of society.

It’s like what Merlin said: