Ten Reasons why Jewish Supremacists HATE Free Speech for Goyim(and Conscientious Jews who dare to speak the truth)

There was a time when Jews were associated with defense of unfettered free speech. Many Americans were fooled that those Jews stood on principle. As it turned out, Jews defended Free Speech from the onset of the Cold War to around the mid-80s(when they realized they had near-total lock on higher institutions) because so many Jews were communists and radicals whose values and agendas were at odds with mainstream society. Also, Jews were seeking to legalize porn to (1) rake in huge profits from goyim (2) commoditize white women into marketable meat and (3) undermine manners and norms that strengthened the moral fiber of goy communities. Jews pushed pornography just like the Sackler Dynasty peddled opioids and other dangerous drugs. Back then, as Jews lacked total control of the institutions — and because considerable authority & influence still remained with the Catholic Church, religious organizations, patriotic/conservative groups, and family-centered America — , they felt they had no choice but to push for Total Freedom of Speech. Under the guise of Free Speech as a Constitutional principle, Jews could push radical agendas and seek to legalize pornography(and also break down the barriers between pornography and mainstream culture). Jews even had some of their own infiltrate or organize Neo-Nazi groups and stir up lots of noise. Then, the ACLU, to burnish its credentials as a champion of freedom, would do some token defending of these far-right groups. It created the impression that Jews are so idealistic that they will even go so far as to defend their arch-enemies, the Nazis. In the video below, we see the last time the ACLU stood for unfettered free speech for all. It is now totally with the PC witch-hunters.


The truth has been out of the bag for some time, especially with the rise of PC. Jewish passion for Free Speech was all just a ruse. The reason why Jews once feigned concern for Free Speech was to push their radical, tribal, and pornographic agendas. But once they gained dominant power, they had NO INTENTION of defending free speech for all. (Incidentally, a crucial reason why the period from the late 60s to the mid 80s was the Golden Era of Free Speech was because everything was in a state of flux or limbo. Neither Conservatives nor Liberals had total lock on morality, values, institutions, and message. The 60s and even the 70s were a time of both Abbie Hoffman and John Wayne. Traditional forces were waning but not yet finished, and Jews were on the rise but not yet totally dominant. And the Boomer generation, that staked itself on rebellion against the Man, wanted to believe itself to be agents for greater freedom. And yet, its self-image as the progressive & radical generation increasingly led it toward Political Correctness. In ALL IN THE FAMILY, both Archie and Meathead are for and against Free Speech in their own way. Archie is more open to crude speech about different racial, national, and religious groups, but he will defend suppression of anti-American radical speech. Meathead is, at least in principle, for Free Speech, but his holier-than-thou attitude presages the rise of Political Correctness. If he had to choose between right to free speech and righteous outrage, we know he’ll opt for the latter.)

Anyway, here we are in the 21st century, and Jews have total lock on just about all institutions and industries that matter. They control elite academia(that sets the template for rest of schooling, from state colleges to kindergarten). They control big media(which are essentially propaganda wing of the Deep State that is also controlled by Jews). They control top law firms and courts that decide who will be prosecuted and who will be let off easy. (Ever notice how the Power treats Antifa and Proud Boys differently? If Antifa attacks and the Proud Boys fight back, the latter is prosecuted. It's like how Israeli Justice System favors Zionist invaders in West Bank over displaced and brutalized Palestinians. Jews see whites as White Palestinians.) Jews control Wall Street and play caesar on who gets financing and who doesn’t. Jews control all the big social platforms either by direct ownership or through their proxy organizations such as SPLC and ADL that get to monitor who gets to remain on Twitter or who gets to sell books on Amazon. And there is an annual Nuremberg Rally in the US called the AIPAC Conference where goy-whore-politicians gather to pledge everlasting loyalty to Israel as the 10,000 yr Reich of the Jews.

Now, one might think that Jews would be more easy-going with their immense power. After all, if Jews were for Free Speech when they had considerably less power in the 50s and 60s, wouldn't they be for more free speech now since they are safe and secure as the dominant elites with so much money and power? Evidently not. If anything, becoming the New Ruling Elites of the US(and by extension the World) has paradoxically made Jews even more paranoid and hysterical. Jews are now spoiled and intoxicated with power. They no longer worry about discrimination or pogroms, let alone survival. They no longer worry about country clubs and whom they can marry. They are now addicted to supremacist power and adulation by goyim. They demand to be worshiped as demigods. It must be filet mignon and champagne at every meal. Anything less is an insult to their ego and pride. Today, 'antisemitism' means denying Jews their supremacist privilege as an eternal right.
Then, it's hardly surprising that Jews seem more nervous, anxious, and deranged than ever. They must have everything.
That said, in a way, Jews are being smart. After all, Anglo-American elites(aka Wasps) who were once the ruling elites rested on their laurels, felt secure in their power, and got to behaving magnanimously. Well, what became of them? They were ruthlessly deposed, decapitated, and castrated by resentful Jewish upstarts, much like how the trusting Trojans were destroyed by the Greeks who emerged out of the Wooden Horse. So, the ruling class must never take its power for granted, especially in a diverse nation with many contending tribes. Granted, only Jews could have pulled it off because they had the combination of high IQ, strong personality, intense tribalism, resentment & vengefulness(toward Christian Society), and the clever ploy of ‘Holocaust Guilt’ to use as moral shield against criticism of Jewish Power. Jews make a big deal about how the US went from ‘white supremacism’ to a land of ‘diversity and equality’, but in the upper echelons of power the US had only two elites: the Wasps and Bugs(Busy-Urban-Globalist-Semites). At the top, the power went from Anglo-Germanic elites(and Waspized Catholic Irish) to Jewish elites, and most of Diversity has merely been a political weapon used by Jews against White Power. Jews are UNWILLING to share power with Diversity. Diversity is merely their cudgel or attack dog. Just look how Jews responded to Ilhan Omar and non-white critics of Israel who support the BDS Movement.

Because Jews are so powerful, they fear becoming the focus of goy ire because, after all, it is natural for the masses to blame the ruling class for most of the macro-problems. (When Wasps were at the top, Jews surely allied with various groups, including with white ethnics and Catholics, to blame and excoriate the Anglo-American elites for EVERYTHING.)
Jewish elites especially feel nervous and paranoid because Jews don’t have the numbers. Jews are merely 2% of the US population. At the very least, Anglo-Germanic-Celtic-American elites had vast support among white gentiles. (And even non-Anglo-Germanic-Celtic white Americans became effectively Anglo-Americanized in due time. Polish-Americans and others joined with White Christian/Gentile America.) In contrast, Jewish elites feel like the British overlords in Asia, Africa, and the Near East. They have the ruling power but not the numbers to back them up. When nationalist passions began to stir in British colonies, the British ruling class was effectively doomed, the most famous case being India’s independence from the Empire in 1948. Soon thereafter, the natives in other British colonies also clamored for independence and liberation, and the British were expelled from most of their colonies(like Jews had been expelled from so many nations, though, granted, the British weren’t as hated by the locals as the Jews were through the ages. Indeed, once British imperialism ended, the locals were happy to have British return as tourists and businessmen. And many longed to move to Great Britain.) The rise of Jewish power has been spectacular, but the fall could be likewise, and that is what Jews fear. It is because Jews lack the numbers. If many people come to realize Jewish elites rule America and, furthermore, tend to be exploitative, parasitic, venal, and mendacious than decent, kind, generous, and magnanimous, the tide could turn. White Americans who’ve come to regard Jews as wise and tragic Holy Holocaust people can come to see them as a bunch of a**holes. This is why Jews seek to increase Goy Diversity so as to play various groups against one another. The great irony is that, even though Jews use Diversity against whites, whites are still the most pro-Jewish group in the US while many members of Diversity aren’t so keen on Jews or even hate them. Also, because many non-whites are recent arrivals, they’ve been less acculturated to the American neo-religion of Jew-Worship. Furthermore, non-whites are encouraged by Jewish elites to hate white people as ‘racist oppressors’, but non-whites often can’t distinguish between whites and Jews. In many cases, they notice that Jews are the richest and most powerful whites, not least because Jews seem to have so many whites & Christians singing endless hosannas to Israel. Also, even as Jews dump on Donald Trump, he seems to love Jews more than any other people and seems so chummy with Bibi Netanyahu of ‘far-right’ Israel. Jews tell Diversity to hate the GOP, but the GOP says it loves Jews and Israel more than the Democrats do. If GOP is the party of ‘racist whites’, and if those evil whites love Israel so much(more than even America), where do Jews fit into all this?

Anyway, Jews now have near-total power, and that is why they fear Free Speech. Free Speech means the freedom of the powerless to have their say, and it has been greatly amplified by the power of the internet, especially the rise of social media and video platforms. So, even though Jews still have control of dominant institutions, their agenda can be upended by certain individuals. Take someone like Pewdiepie who started out as a nothing, a nobody. Prior to the internet age, he would have been some eccentric kid on the block. But he began to develop a massive following, and his videos are now seen by tens of millions of people.

Mark Dice, Paul Joseph Watson, Sargon of Akkad, Styxhexenhammer666, Ramzpaul, Black Pigeon Speaks, Jared Taylor, Roosh, Stefan Molyneux, J.F. Gariepy, Ryan Dawson, Vincent James, Nick Fuentes, Steve Turley, and etc. are individuals without institutional power, but their messages sometimes reach a larger audience than well-funded enterprises and organizations do. So, someone with a compelling message and a webcam can be more effective as a conveyer of ideas and messages than well-paid talking heads of MSM who, in order to keep their paychecks, must toe the Party Line. Because individuals are not doing it for money(or for far less than MSM talking heads are), they are freer to say what’s on their minds. They cannot get fired.
And this is why Jewish Power has decided to DEPLATFORM such individuals by using the most Kafkaesque means. When Franz Kafka wrote THE TRIAL and THE CASTLE, he surely didn’t mean them to be used as manuals of power(or maybe his Jewish subconscious did), but that’s what they became in the hands of Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, and etc. These oligarchies always begin by claiming to ban ‘extremist hate speech’ such as praise for Hitler and denial of Shoah, but then the rules get murkier and murkier to the point where even Faith Goldy is de-personed because she thinks mass-immigration-invasion will destroy the Canada that she loves. In many cases, the oligarchies give no clear reason as to WHY someone was denied service or offer the most ludicrous highfalutin explanation, like when Sargon was kicked off Patreon.

Some say the current censorship is ‘anti-conservative’, and even though it’s true that those on the ‘right’ suffer more, it also depends on ethno-centrism. After all, BDS is usually associated with the Left, but it’s been hammered by Jewish power, while Israel, ruled by a ‘far-right’ regime, is favored by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and etc. It doesn’t matter what kinds of international crimes Israel commits against Palestinians or neighbors. The fact is the so-called ‘leftist’ big-shots at Google, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, and etc. gladly work closely with ‘right-wing’ Israel. Why? Because it’s Jews working with Jews. Unlike stupid whites who put ideology before identity, Jews are smart enough to know that identity is more important than ideology in the game of power. Rachel Maddow is said to be a ‘progressive’, but she is a warmongering bitch who serves the Deep State that is in bed with ‘far-right’ Israel. Meanwhile, she denounces left-wing Venezuela. Among Jews, ‘left’ vs ‘right’ is merely a diversion. What matters most to Jews is ‘us’ vs ‘them’. This is why, if Jews use Diversity against whites to advantage Jewish power, whites must grow a pair and use Diversity against Jews in kind. Fight fire with fire. But sadly, even as Jews tell the Diversity Dog to bite whitey, the whitey tries to defend Jews from the Diversity Dog(ordered by Jews to bite whitey). The current White Strategy is the most retarded in human history. Imagine someone beating you with a cudgel and you try to defend him from the very cudgel that he is using to clobber you with. Whites are into the ‘cuckgel’. It’s no wonder Jews feel such contempt for white goy cucks.

In essence, Jews now fear Free Speech because it speaks truth to Jewish Power, which happens to be in supremacist, hegemonist, and even genocidal mode: Wars for Israel and White Nakba(or reduction of whites into reviled & dehumanized minorities in nations of their origins or founding). But because few people will support suppression of Free Speech as criticism of the Powers-that-be, Jews have associated Free Speech with ‘hate’, ‘extremism’, ‘Holocaust Denial’, and ‘white supremacism’. Now, of course, there are those who misuse Free Speech to spew nonsensical bigotry, demented ideas, and crazy notions(like some of the more outlandish theories about 9/11 and the Moon landing). And some like Alex Jones made their reputations through sensationalism.
But, denunciation of hatred, contempt, and extremism is rich coming from Jews who control the music industry and fill the airwaves & TV screens with ugly rap, demeaning lyrics, and skanky idolatry. It’s rich coming from Jews who control Hollywood and made so many movies about subhuman ‘rednecks’ and psychotic Muslims(nearly all of whom are terrorists). It’s rich coming from Jews who control MSM and have promoted endless hate propaganda against Russians, Iranians, Syrians, Palestinians, Venezuelans, Chinese, and etc. According to some Neocon Zionists, the US should brace for World War III, IV, V, and etc. because it’s the destiny of the ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ America to remain the lone superpower forever(esp in service to its Jewish Overlords). A Jewess like Madeleine Albright can say it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children and still be honored by the Establishment. (But if US were to place sanctions on Israel for its illegal Occupation of West Bank and if only 100 Jewish kids died as a result, there would be outrage about Another Holocaust.)

Jewish Power uses extortion rackets like SPLC and ADL(in collusion with the Jew-run Media and platforms) to create the impression that Evil People are using Free Speech to spread ‘hate’, ‘extremism’, and etc. By emphasizing the antics of a handful of self-professed Neo-Nazis and KKK, the Jew-run media create the impression that the US is on the precipice of a ‘fascist’ takeover led by ‘white supremacist’ Donald Trump(while overlooking the fact that, if Trump has been supremacist on anything, it’s been for Zionism Uber Alles and ‘Muh Holocaust’). The very Jews who spread the rancid paranoid hysteria over Russia Collusion and, before that, the lies about WMD(to ignite the Iraq War) are lecturing to us about hatred. And notice that the term ‘White Supremacism’ doesn’t apply only to Neo-Nazis or some such ilk. Jews say that, due to the history of White Supremacism, any sign of white identity, interests, or sovereignty is ‘white supremacist’. Never mind that European Imperialism was often financed by Jewish bankers such as the Rothchilds. If white imperialism was supremacist, then Jewish role in it was also supremacist. Also, Jews played a huge role in the slave trade in the New World. And Jews were the main sellers of opium to the Chinese. And Jews funded the arms industry that led to various wars killing millions. And of course, Jews also played a key role in communism that destroyed millions of more lives.
Now, it’s true that many European Jews got burned in World War II, but then, people who play with fire can get seriously hurt. Why did so many innocent Germans, Russians, and Japanese also perish in the war? Because their elites all played with fire. Though Adolf Hitler was the main driver of events, would the National Socialists have come to power if Jews hadn't played a key role in communism(and its killing of millions before WWII) and Weimar degeneracy & depression that alienated and angered so many Germans? So, Jews weren’t merely innocent victims of World War II. Sure, many innocent Jewish civilians were killed by Hitler’s madness, but the Germans were driven to follow a mad man because their nation was, to a large extent, wrecked by a mad people, the Jews. Jewish behavior in Russia of the 90s offers a clue as to how Jews operate in times of crisis. Instead of trying to fix the problem and set things right, their main focus is to grab as much loot for themselves. While it’s true that many innocent Germans and Japanese(women and children especially) perished in World War II, it’s a fact that their leadership led them down a dangerous path. It’s a sad fact of history that when the elites go bad, the people suffer, indeed often more than the elites do. While some German and Japanese elites were hanged after trial, the far bigger victims were German and Japanese civilians who were firebombed and burned alive. And in Middle East Wars, the rotten US elites haven’t suffered one bit while tens of thousands of American soldiers(mostly white men) have been either killed or crippled for life(with many choosing to take their own lives). Likewise, many innocent and decent Jews perished in World War II because too many Jewish elites were the scum of the earth. Now, are the people entirely innocent? After all, the German and Japanese people supported their mad regimes. And too often, the Jewish masses stood by their elites. We see this everyday in the US and EU. Most Jews side with scum like George Soros. They cheer on Wars for Israel and call for White Replacement. They support ADL and SPLC that spew anti-white hatred. So, even ‘innocent’ Jews aren’t entirely innocent, just like all those Germans who either supported Hitler or failed to resist were partly culpable for what happened. And for that reason, the fate of Jews in World War II has to be seen within the larger context of grim history where, too often, the people perish along with the elites(or perish while the elites get off scot-free). After all, elites face the music ONLY IF they lose power. Josef Stalin also played a key role in the events that led to World War II. He allied with Hitler in the destruction of Poland and was willing to provide war material to Germany as long as the war was on the Western front. But as he was ultimately victorious, he never had to face justice, and it was the Soviet peoples who suffered mightily as the result of his playing with fire with political pyromaniac Hitler.

Whenever Jews kvetch about ‘white supremacism’, whites need to point to countless examples of Jews taking part in it, financing it, profiteering off it, and aiding & abetting it in myriad ways to squeeze out advantages for themselves. Take the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians. Massive Immigration-invasion by Europeans(and Jews) led to the destruction of native Indian communities & cultures across America. Jews totally took part in it. Jewish merchants sold guns to white cowboys to kill Indians with. And in the American South, Jews handled the money of the slave trade and slave plantations. And Jews disproportionately owned more slaves than whites did. Jews played an even bigger role in Brazilian slavery, the biggest slave enterprise in the New World. There was Jewish banking money behind British, French, and German imperialism. And Jews were the main sellers of opium to the Chinese. So, modern Jewish history is inseparable from ‘white supremacist’ history. Also, the main vehicle of ‘white supremacism’ was Western Imperialism(partially but substantially funded by Jews), and the biggest threat to ‘white supremacist’ imperialism was the rising nationalism of non-whites who resisted. Much of modern history can be understood in terms of supremacism-via-imperialism and sovereignty-via-nationalism. Now, have Jews been more for imperialism or nationalism? Jews have usually sided with the imperialists because their financial ambitions have been worldwide. In order to penetrate and profiteer from various markets, Jews needed to weaken the national sovereignty of peoples around the world and support imperialism as the means of hegemony. So, Jewish history has been very much linked with ‘white supremacy’.
Furthermore, Jewish immigration patterns have always followed in the footsteps of ‘white supremacists’. So, if whites conquered and gained mastery over non-white peoples, Jews followed along to profit off the opportunity created by ‘white supremacists’. Look at the Jewish monopoly of diamond mines and markets in South Africa. Indeed, where would Jewish Power be without the ‘white supremacist’ horse to ride on? If not for white imperialism and conquest of New World, Africa, Asia, and Middle East, Jews could not have made their vast fortunes. The Sassoon family that made a killing by selling opium to the Chinese rode on the horse of British ‘white supremacist’ imperialism. And how was the Zionist Project realized? Jewish bankers bribed British Imperialists to declare Palestine as a future Jewish state. And then, Jews pulled the strings in UK, Germany, USSR, and the US to get their way with Palestinians who were eventually expelled from their homeland in the tragic Nakba pogroms that were clearly Jewish-supremacist-and-imperialist. So, whenever Jews bitch about ‘white supremacism’, we need to tell them to shut the f*** up because Jews have been the biggest leeches of ‘white supremacism’.
But Jews, having no sense of honor or principles, try to have the cake and eat it too. Jews followed white conquests & discoveries(at the expense of non-whites) and took advantages of opportunities to enrich themselves(often far more than what whites got), but then, Jews also excoriated white people for their ‘historical sins’ of mistreating non-whites. Imagine that. Jews funded and followed white conquests and filled up their bellies and sacks, BUT they act like they are moral saints with some God-given right to pass judgement on others. The nerves. The chutzpah. Imagine you go hunting for a moose. And a Jew follows you and gives lend a hand at times. And when you bring down the moose, the Jew joins you in gorging on its meat. But then, the Jew wants all of the kill, and so, what does he do? He begins to berate you as a heartless hunter and ‘human supremacist’ killer of the poor noble moose. Therefore, you deserve NOTHING more of the moose, all of which is to be claimed by the Jew. Yes, that is how dirty and vile Jews play the game of history. Jews grab-and-take on the basis of bottomless greed but then pontificate from the highest perch. They act like Harvey Weinstein but sermonize like they’re Moses or something. They play prophets-for-profits.

What Jews fear most is not ‘white supremacism’ because, deep down inside, they know very well that most whites are not into supremacism or imperialism. Most whites believe the Age of Empire is long over, and their only wish is to have peace and prosperity in their own nations. When the French, British, Dutch, Spanish, and other empires fell, most Europeans went back home. And after the Cold War, the understanding was that Russians, Americans, and the rest of the world would mind their own business, and stability would prevail around the world. But then, guess which people hated the future vision of sovereign nations(except for Israel of course). Jews hated it because most nations are majority gentile. If every gentile nation was independent and sovereign, it’d be difficult for Jews to penetrate and take over. And so, Jews pushed the neo-imperialism of globalism that would kill two birds with one stone. Its agenda was to render the non-white world(and Russia) open to military invasion, financial takeover, and/or cultural imperialism of the US. In turn, all the West would be open to Third World mass-invasions. And of course, Jews would use homo-collaborators around the world to serve as agents. With control of the US, Jews would use American Power to pressure the rest of the world to put out to the cock of Uncle Samowicz. But lest White Americans grow discontent with playing toady-dogs to Jewish Power and say NO MORE to Jewish supremacism, Jews figured on increasing Goy Diversity so that diverse goyim will be at each other’s throats than uniting to take on Jewish supremacist power. Meanwhile, Jews could gradually recruit non-whites to fill white shoes.
But for the time being, Jews need white gentile collaboration with Jewish supremacist power because Jews cannot do all the grunt work to keep the empire going. Just like the British Imperialists in India needed local elite collaborators to run much of the system, Jews in the West rely mainly on white goy managers, supervisors, engineers, commanders, and etc. to carry much of the weight. And the only way Jews can ensure White Obeisance to Jewish Supremacism is by brainwashing whites into believing that white identity, white pride, white heritage, white consciousness, white interests, and etc. are all synonymous with ‘white supremacism’. So, even "It’s Okay to be White" = Evil White Supremacy. But in fact, Jews are really defending their own supremacism by keeping whites in submissive mode. When Jews holler, ‘white supremacism’, it’s really akin to a Southern Slave-owner denouncing a black slave who wants to be free as an ‘uppity crazy nigger’. How dare a ‘nigger’ want to be free when it’s his role in life to keep his head bowed low and serve his master, without whom he is nothing? Likewise, Jews feel, "How dare white gentiles seek emancipation, independence, autonomy, and separation from us Jews? Don’t those subhuman goy lowlifes know that they exist to SERVE us, OBEY us, KILL for us, DIE for us, SING for us, and GROVEL before us?" The fact that Facebook Jews decided to ban ‘white nationalism’ and ‘white separatism’ as synonymous with ‘white supremacism’ makes it plain as day what is really happening. The Jewish moral argument is total BS. White Nationalists, White Separatists, White Identitarians, and etc. are not, for the most part, associated with white supremacism of the Neo-Nazi or KKK school. Rather, they just want to live in a world of their own and leave other peoples alone.
So, what is the problem then? The problem is such people will not support the Jewish supremacist-imperialist Wars for Israel. They won’t support the ‘new cold war’ with Russia. They will not necessarily favor Zionists over Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians. And being conscious of their white identity, they will be sufficiently proud and independent to refuse to bow down before Jews like pathetic dogs and playing fetch. And as they want a world of their own, they will say NO to mass-immigration-invasion. But if Diversity agenda is stopped cold, it’ll be more difficult for Jews to play divide-and-rule among goyim to maintain their supremacist power over a fragmented populace. So, the Jewish War on Free Speech is not about combating White Supremacism. That's just a cover, a ruse. It’s really about safeguarding the currently dominant Jewish Supremacism by shutting down True Speech of those who dare to speak truth to Power, one that is now overwhelmingly Jewish and Globalist. Jews use their vast networks to create the illusion that most of Free Speech among ‘white nationalists’ is about praising Hitler and Holocaust, but this BS is Hollywood reality. In truth, what Jews are freaking out about is that the so-called ‘white nationalism’ is really about White National Liberation from Jewish supremacist globo-homo imperialism. It’s about the possibility of mass white-desertion from Jewish globalist hegemony that has spread homo-tranny degeneracy, Afro-thuggery, interracist pornography, child-corrupting degeneracy, Wars for Israel & deaths of countless Arabs/Muslims, Hate Propaganda against Russia & Iran, and financial robbery by Wall Street. Just like commanders in war are nothing if the soldiers desert, Jewish supremacist power is nothing if goyim, especially whites, say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and refuse to serve as the pawns of venal Jews who look upon goyim as so much cannon fodder.


Indeed, isn’t it weird how Jews do so much to defame, degrade, and denounce whites but then demand that whites stick with Jews and do their bidding? If Jews hate white people so much, why did Jewish immigration always chase after whites? Why didn’t Jews leave Europe long ago? And why didn’t Jews emigrate to Africa, Asia, or any part of the world without whites? Even today, who is forcing Jews to live in white nations? If Jews love immigration and non-whites, they can have BOTH by moving from white lands to non-white ones. But these Jews who endlessly insult and berate whites as the worst scum of the earth are always calling on whites to support Jews and bail them out. Imagine someone who spits in your face and whips you night & day but then demands that you work for him and defend him. If he hates you so much, why does he so obsessively cling to you? Why doesn’t he go his own way so that you can go your own way? Of course, he uses threat and violence against you to keep you as his servant and dog. Just like a rider or stage-coach driver must constantly remind the horse or horses that they exist to serve humans, Jews must constantly use verbal whips and harness to keep whites in line. But then, it was the same with blacks in the South. It was precisely because southern plantations depended so much on slave labor that blacks had to be kept in line to obey, pick cotton, and carry bales on their backs. If blacks weren’t made to feel inferior to whites, they might say, "Why we be doing all this shit for dat honkey-ass mofo who done hire overseers to call us ‘nigger’?" Whites had to psychologically exploit black inferiority along with threats of physical punishment to keep blacks in line. The white narrative said, "Because of the history of black ugabuga jungle savagery, blacks must understand that they need to undergo the purgatory of slavery to be shaped into hard-working, law-abiding, and constructive individuals who may one day be worthy of civilization." Whites exploited the element of Black Shame to control blacks. Today, Jews are the massuhs of globalism, and they use ‘White Guilt’ to control whites. The Jewish Narrative says, "Because whites committed so many historical ‘sins’ with genocide and slavery and racism and etc., they must reject their white identity and work for the good of all humanity, namely by serving the agenda of Jewish supremacists." Jews tell whites to drop white identity for all-humanity but then demand that they serve Jews uber alles. Bait and Switch. Jews make whites surrender 'white supremacism' for equality, only to steer the deracinated whites into serving Jewish supremacism.
Notice how devious and clever these Jews are. Jews always talk of ‘white supremacism’ as something separate from Jewish history. Jews do this by invoking the Shoah as a case of Jewish victim-hood at the hands of white ‘racist anti-Semites’. Jews also remind the world of Jewish persecution at the hands of the White Christian West. Jews don’t mention that they played a huge role in white slave trade in the Middle Ages. Jews don’t mention that they collaborated with Moorish and Turkish invaders into Europe. Jews don’t mention that they worked for European noblemen to exploit the peasantry. Jews don’t mention the fact that they lent huge sums to European monarchs and government to wage wars and conquer entire parts of the world. Jewish money played a very significant role in European Imperialism. Jewish historiography is totally selective and dishonest and completely lacking in honor. Lacking a martial culture and having developed under a merchant culture, Jews are hagglers and hustlers than men who would put their lives and reputations on the line.

Anyway, what are the 10 Reasons why Jews HATE Free Speech? Let us count the ways.

1. Jews hate Free Speech because We might call for NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL. Notice how Jews hate Tulsi Gabbard who wants to end the crazy war in Syria. Free Speech allows us to decry how Jews have been using the US military as hammer of Jewish globalist hegemony. Jews make up less than 0.3% of US military but make up more than 50% of the decision makers. And even most non-Jewish politicians take their cues from Jewish donors. So, all these Wars in the Middle East have been Wars for Israel that Jews want but we don’t want. Free Speech means we can freely notice Jewish Power and call out on its abuses. We can say NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL and no more human sacrifice of goyim as cannon fodder to serve the tribalist supremacism of Jews.

2. Jews hate Free Speech because We might denounce Israel’s use of IDF death squads to mow down Palestinian women and children who want to return to their homeland, from which their ancestors were expelled in the Nakba Pogroms. The US is supposed to have a Free Media that conveys the truth, but we don’t hear much truth from the (((media))) on the matter of Palestinians. So, IDF death squads get to commit more acts of cold-blooded murder and get away with it.

3. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak the truth about the Jewish ethno-monopoly of the media. Most of the Mass Media is owned and/or controlled by Jews. Fox News is goy-owned, but many of its top executives are Jewish, and it’s been said it is even more pro-Zionist than Jewish-owned outlets. The idea of Free Media is just that: An idea than reality. How can we have a truly Free Media when most of MSM are controlled by a handful of oligarchs, almost all of them Jewish who hire and fire people depending on how obeisant they are to Israel, Jewish Power, globo-homo propaganda, and other agendas favored by Jewish supremacist elites.

4. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak the truth about black crime. Why do Jews cover up black crime and violence? It’s because Jews use ‘white guilt’ as a form of mind-control over whites. According to the Jew-run media, blacks are either awesomely cool or tragically noble(or both), and whites must atone for their grave sins against such a wonderful & superb race. ‘White guilt’ about blacks is effective ONLY IF whites continue to see blacks as super-cool and/or saintly. In fact, as Colin Flaherty has tirelessly documented, blacks are the most violent, thuggish, demented, aggressive, arrogant, and destructive people in the US. They commit the most crime, and most non-black races have most to fear from black criminals, thugs, or bullies. Black cool is a media illusion, and black nobility is a fraud. Sure, blacks were victimized in the past, and there is a very real tragic dimension to their history in America. But it’s also true that evolution made blacks tougher, more aggressive, and more pathological. As such, they are the main predators and lunatics in American streets and schools. Jews seek to suppress free speech and true speech about blacks because they want to keep the torch of ‘white guilt’ going.


5. Jews hate Free Speech because We might call for the commemoration of Nakba Pogroms of 1948 that ethno-expelled 700,000 Palestinians from their homeland. Last year, 2018, was the 70th anniversary of Nakba, but notice that the Jewish-dominated US media totally ignored it. And when IDF death squads mowed down Palestinians who marched to the border to seek re-entry into their lost homeland, not a single American politician spoke up for the dead women and children. This is why Jews hate Free Speech. With true Free Speech, we can call upon all the good people to remember and commemorate Nakba.

6. Jews hate Free Speech because We might challenge bogus historical narratives and say that Leo Frank was guilty of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan. Jewish Power has duped us with Fake History that has portrayed Leo Frank as an innocent Jew set upon by an ‘antisemitic’ lynch mob when it was the furthest thing from the truth. If anything was ‘antisemitic’(or antisemitism-confirming), it was the behavior of the Northern Jewish Community that pulled every dirty trick in the book to clear Leo Frank of a crime he most likely committed. Jews bitch about ‘antisemitic tropes’ nowadays, but if anything perpetuates ‘antisemitic stereotypes’, it is Jewish behavior that is so often without honor & principles and will resort to any means, no matter how foul and filthy, to get their way.

7. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak about how Jews took advantage of post-communist Russia in the 1990s to economically loot the nation for the aggrandizement of limitless Jewish greed. Indeed, what Jews did to Russia of the 1990s gives us hints as to what Jews did to Germany in the Weimar Period. When Jews see a crisis, they see an opportunity. As Jews hold goyim in contempt, they don’t use the crisis for the good of all people but to fill their pockets and secure yet more advantages for themselves. They see yet another round of the Shylock Doctrine.
Because Jews own the Western Media, most people are still in the dark as to Jewish perfidy in Russia of the 90s and why Russians supported the semi-autocratic nationalist rule by Vladimir Putin who, by hook and by crook, wrested some of the power from the Jewish oligarchs who nearly came to own all of Russia and run it(mostly to the ground). Amy Chua discussed the problem in her book WORLD ON FIRE, but she’s been tamed since then into a hapless yellow dog who fetches for Jewish Power. https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/04/18/must-read-the-rape-of-russia-video/

8. Jews hate Free Speech because We might condemn Jewish organized crime and Israel as the biggest white slavers of the 21st century. Jewish gangsters have long been involved in prostitution and drugs, but Jews took this to new heights after the collapse of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. As Jews regarded these goy women as ‘shikses’(Yiddish for ‘filthy gentile whore scum animals’), the women were nothing but pieces of meat for the sex market. As there were so many poor and desperate women in Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Europe, Jews turned many of them into prostitutes. But even worse, many of these women were enticed to Israel for work whereupon they were forced in sexual slavery and beatings. Of course, Hollywood movies like TAKEN would have us believe that Muslims and Eastern European gentiles are behind abduction and slavery of white women, but the fact is Jews dominated the business. With Free Speech, we can speak this truth, and that’s why Jews hate Free Speech as the weapon of truth. Truth will undermine Jewish perfidy and rottenness.

9. Jews hate Free Speech because We might discuss the Jewish role in communism. While many Jewish communists were sincere and courageous in their commitment to change and progress, the radical socialist ideology as cure turned out to be worse than the disease. Also, too many Jewish Bolsheviks, flush with power and privilege, just couldn’t control their lust for ruthless violence and terror. Jewish communists especially targeted Russian Orthodox Christians and Ukrainian peasantry that had a tradition of defiance and independence. Jewish Bolsheviks played a key role in smashing 50,000 Churches in Russia and Ukraine. Also, they played a significant role in what is called the Holodomor in Ukraine where it’s been estimated that 3 to 4 million people perished due to man-made famines. While Jews were not the only people responsible for the excesses of communist horror, they played a very important part. But as Jewish control the Narrative via media and academia, we’ve been led to believe that Jews were the most tragic victims of Stalinism and Soviet tyranny, which is total baloney. While many Jews did face persecution under Stalinism and what came later, they were devoured by the very monster that they helped to create.

10. Jews hate Free Speech because We might discuss the Jewish role in the opioid crisis that, from 1997 to 2017, killed 400,000 people, the vast majority of them of the white working class. Lately, Jews in NY have been denouncing the Sacklers, but it’s like deja vu of faux Jewish outrage over Bernie Madoff. NY Jews are trying to signal that THEY had NOTHING to do with the loathsome Sacklers who, like the Jewish Sassoon Dynasty that monopolized the opium trade in China, knowingly peddled horribly addictive drugs to unsuspecting white Americans. NY Jews most likely knew all along what was going on. After all, NY is Wall Street, the financial capital of the world through which Jewish oligarchs have been raping and plundering the world. Much of the wealth in NY is ill-gotten. Consider how Wall Street made off like bandits during the housing bubble. When their dirty schemes crashed and they were faced with bankruptcy, they used their puppets in governments to bail them out, and then these Jews had another round of super-profiteering while rest of the nation was stuck in near-zero growth. Just like Madeline Albright said it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children for the sake of Israel, Sacklers obviously thought it was worth it to kill 400,000 goyim(and many more as they were in the business before 1999) to rake in more billions for the Jews. Jews covered up for Bernie Madoff when he was a cash cow for them and then dumped him only when he was no longer useful. And of course, the Jew-run media spun the narrative that Madoff stole mostly from Jews when, in fact, he mostly stole from goyim to enrich Jews. His Jewish clientele lost out only in the end.

There are many more reasons why Jews hate Free Speech, and we may cover them in the future. But the important thing is to remind ourselves that when Jews say they only want to remove ‘hate’ from Free Speech, DON’T YOU BELIEVE IT. If anything, Jews aren’t fearful of Neo-Nazi or KKK crazy speech because such gives the impression that there are indeed lots of extremist people out there just itching to start World War III and the Holocaust. Deep down inside, Jews know that Neo-Nazis and KKK hardly exist, and that is why Jews fund groups like SPLC to operate like Hollywood in conjuring scary stories about Nazi or KKK under every bed or around every corner. And of course, Jews push all these Hate Hoaxes that are meant to defame whites as vandals of Jewish graves and black churches when, if anything, the majority of the much publicized ‘hate crimes’ were actually carried out by blacks and Jews. https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/18/hoax-hate-crimes-list/ The real reason why Jews seek to suppress Free Speech is no different from why the Cuban or North Korean government does. People speaking freely is a challenge to the supremacist power of the ruling elites. Just like the leaders of Cuba and North Korea want to seem infallible, Jewish Power is no different. Indeed, Jews endlessly invoke the term ‘antisemitic’ to defame and discredit ANY criticism of Jewish Power. Jews respond to criticism like Big Brother. Just like Winston Smith must love Big Brother, we must love Big Jew. If we see evidence of dominant Jewish power, it may be ‘antisemitic’ on our part... that is unless, like Joe Biden, one says everything Jews do, such as pushing ‘gay marriage’ and white replacement, is ALL FOR THE GOOD. So, that’s your choice. You must pretend Jews aren’t particularly rich and powerful, OR if you do notice Jewish wealth and power, you must blather on and on about how power and wealth in the hands of Jews can ONLY DO GOOD and NEVER DO BAD. And of course, if Jews make a big mess of something, just find a ‘scapegoy’. Iraq War go badly? Never mind the Zionists who pulled the strings and orchestrated the event. Just blame goyim Bush the dummy and Dick Cheney the gangster.

Jewish Internet Monopolies do all they can to shut down Free Speech of Americans

European Civilization's Great Advantage over the US was HAVING NO BLACKS, but No Longer as EU has gone Afro-maniacal — PC is Ideological Veganism & the Need for a Food Pyramid of the Mind with Ethno-Nationalism as Foundation

https://www.unz.com/sbpdl/blacks-are-13-of-london-englands-population-blacks-represent-50-of-the-murder-suspects-in-london/

Blacks Are 13% of London, England's Population: Blacks Represent 50% of the Murder Suspects in London

Prior to black immigration-invasion into Europe, the virtual lack-of-black or Black-Lack was the one true blessing and advantage that Europe had over the US. And same for Canada and Australia. Whatever was wrong with Europe or deficient vis-a-vis the US, it didn’t have the ghastly Black Problem. Nations without the Black problem have no idea how fortunate they are. If they think things are bad at home, they should take heart in knowing it could be much much worse with blacks. Things bad in Uzbekistan or Nepal? Just be thankful it doesn’t have the black problem. Indeed, "at least we don't have the black problem" should be the bright side for nations without a black population. Just when it seems things can't get any worse, it can if the nation fills up with blacks.

Despite the horrors of World War I and World War II(and tragedies associated with Communism and National Socialism), Europe could at least rest assured in having had no blacks(or just a tiny fraction that kept blacks at the level of curiosity than problem). In the long term, even horrible wars were less destructive than having Negroes. Indeed, look at the recovery of Berlin, Warsaw, Prague, St. Petersburg, Tokyo, and even Hiroshima soon after WWII. Tens of millions died and entire cities were turned to rubble, but in peacetime, there was breakneck construction, restoration, and return to normal. Whites and Japanese can be tremendously destructive in wartime(because their logistical and organizational skills are so impressive), but in peacetime, they are builders and maintainers. In contrast, blacks are ceaselessly destructive even in peacetime if they are afforded full freedom.

Unlike Europe(and Japan) that rebuilt rapidly after WWII, many American cities from the 1960s onward turned into cesspits of degradation and deterioration due to the BAMMAMA factor: Blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. Blacks can easily overpower whites, terrorize communities, and destroy social trust & order that are so central to maintaining a good society. (Even though some American cities recovered via gentrification, the black problem didn’t go away as cities like NY and Chicago sent the blacks to towns and suburbs. Rather, rich yuppie-hipsters or yupsters just passed the buck or hot potato to OTHER communities that had less clout and resources to say NO to the Black Flood.)

So, despite Europe being engulfed in the biggest conflagrations in human history while continental US was spared the devastation of both WWI and WWII, things got bleaker in American cities than in European cities in the postwar period. The looming threat for American cities was the time bomb of black rage and savagery that was just ticking to go off. Indeed, even relatively impoverished Communist cities in Eastern Europe were nicer and safer than American cities like NY, Detroit, Chicago, Newark, Baltimore, and etc beginning especially in the mid-60s.

Surely, Europeans(and Canadians and Australians) knew about the American Race problem from watching the news. Their one great blessing and one great advantage over the US were HAVING NO BLACKS to run wild, terrorize law-abiding citizens, and wreck communities. Tragically, instead of feeling thankful and lucky for having no blacks, it was as though Europeans felt envy for not having them. Why? Not enough 'vibrancy'?

1. Blacks won in sports and were prominent in popular music, and whites all over the world came to swoon with adulation over figures like Muhammad Ali, Pele, and Miles Davis. So, Europeans wanted their own ‘cool’ blacks too, especially as black American athletes often beat up white European ‘palookas’. Why should the US win in all the cool events with their blacks? If Europe couldn't compete on the global level with black Americans, maybe they needed 'black Europeans' to bring home the trophy.
In time, Rap and Afro-Pop became the main music of France, and Rap and Reggae came to dominate UK pop scene. And as blacks came to own the most popular sports, European cucky-wucks found themselves cheering for blacks as their national heroes. Most British boxing champions have been black since the 80s. French soccer players, boxers, and runners are virtually all black. People are tribal but also naturally servile to winners(even of the Other Tribe). Just like French women went with victorious German men during the Nazi Occupation, white folks rejected loser white athletes and prostrated themselves at the feet of black stars. Whites pledged their cuck-loyalty to the tribalism of blacks as the superior race. Tribalism is most effective when backed with pride and victory. When one's tribalism is associated with loss, defeat, and humiliation, there is the temptation to forsake one's own pathetic tribe and serve the masterful tribe.

2. World Media were dominated by Globalists and Jews, and they spun American racial problems as entirely the fault of whites and ‘racism’. Hollywood spread the image of the Magic Negro who only knew oppression under white bigotry and the nobility of struggle for justice. Many such movies featured haloed blacks. It's no wonder that Europeans loved Barack Obama and felt envy for not having someone like him or Mandela as their own leader. Media and Entertainment made whites(and other races) look upon blacks as sacred objects as John Derbyshire has opined many times.
So, the conventional wisdom was that American blacks were just rebelling against legacy of slavery and discrimination. Black violence is always innately noble and moral.

Conceited Europeans figured that they would teach ‘racist’ America how to properly treat blacks. Europe would welcome blacks(from Africa, America, Caribbean, and etc) and treat them with love and decency, and these 'black Europeans' won’t become like American blacks who had no choice but to resort to violence against oppression. Furthermore, Europe would redeem its 'historical sins' by transforming poor African blacks into first-rate 'European blacks'.

In one way, Europeans worship blacks as the superior race with great idolic or idolatrous value. But they also doted on blacks as the childlike race in need of the guidance and beneficence of whites. After all, Europe is rich and modern, Africa is poor and backward. Blacks have become objects of both worship and condescension, as if they are almighty god and helpless baby. Fiendish blacks adroitly sensed and manipulated this delusional white psychology to squeeze ever more concessions from whitey. Blacks toyed with both the servile and maternal instincts of white folks. (Also, as white elites in affluent communities were safe and secure from social problems and rubbed shoulders with better blacks or Good Diversity, they didn’t care about the fate of poor whites who'd likely end up integrating with Bad Diversity. The rich whites get Obamas, the poor whites get Mike Tysons.)

3. In time, white women got jungle fever and white guys strapped on their cuck-shorts. A hit movie in France had a rich white paraplegic who is taken care by big muscular Negro. The message is clear. White guy is reason & riches but no body, and the black body must become the new body of Europe. Whites elites, as the head of the West, don't need the white mass as national body; blacks will take over as the new national body and colonize white wombs. And in BITTER MOON by Roman Polanski, the white guy(Peter Coyote) in the wheel chair is tormented and humiliated by his former lover who gets it on with a Negro. He can only watch helplessly. BBC TV is now all about match-making white women with black men in movie and TV roles. As for white guys, their roles are usually cucky or ‘gay’. No more white national heroes. And young white girls in Europe grow up twerking like their American counterparts. And they go to dance clubs to have their butts bumped-and-grinded by black men.



It just goes to show that the fantasy-reality of media & entertainment can override reality. The grim reality of the US since the 1960s has been "blacks + freedom = fall of civilization", along with end of white manhood as racial integration leads to black guys jumping white guys and humping white girls. Blacks cannot handle freedom like civilized people. Nature and evolution made them too wild and crazy. (Also, feminist 'liberation' has led to white women hankering to be whore-slaves of black men. Women find greatest happiness in surrender, not domination. So, women's liberation really comes down to women freeing themselves of relations with'loser' beta-males and seeking out alpha-males to submit to. As black men have tough-guy-advantage over white men, women's liberation has meant 'empowered' white women increasingly rejecting beta-white-males in search of alpha-black-males, even if only for short-lived affairs. Women's Liberation is not about women seeking equality for all people but about rejecting whom they deem to be inferior men in pursuit of superior men. Women's Liberation has made women more competitive for the limited number of winner-men.)

Europeans should have sighed with relief at their good fortune of black-free cities and towns because news depicted so many reports of race problems in America and black pathology in Africa. But, the media spun American race problems as “It’s all racist whitey’s fault” and “noble blacks are so cool”. And media spun the black African problem as either “It’s all due to white imperialism, and all the world must worship Mandela as god" or "Just a little bit more of white love and compassion can do SO MUCH for black Africans who are just brimming with limitless potential waiting to be tapped."
Also, the dogma of blank-slatism and ‘race is just a construct’ had too many whites believing anyone can be molded into anything. So, if millions of black Africans come to the EU, they can easily molded into 'New Europeans' with a bit of education, acculturation, and training.
As the result of such follies, Europe is going to hell. If Japan, which is so far away from Africa and West, is going afro-jungle with Japanese women having kids with black men and raising them to beat up smaller/weaker Japanese and take over Japanese sports and pop culture, imagine the fate of Europe where millions upon millions of muscled and big-donged Negroes are coming from Africa with only two things in mind, “Where’s the free stuff” and “Where the white women at?”

The biggest threat to the world is the vilification of ‘racism’ that prevents people from realizing the most important truth: Blacks will destroy your nations, and therefore, you must form a tribal defense system to keep blacks out of your domain. (If Ism means belief, then Race + Ism must mean belief in the reality of race and racial differences. 'Racism' is the most ill-defined term in the world. As races do exist and racial differences are real, race-ism must be embraced by all peoples if they are to properly understand reality and take necessary measures to safeguard their own race and community. As blacks are superior in muscle power, aggression, and thuggery, all non-black societies must be wary of blacks coming to settle, terrorize, and take over.) Denial of race-ism is like political veganism. Without honest-to-good race-ist nutrients of tribal protein and iron, the white mind-and-body will be too anemic to change course and save Western civilization from the Ghastly Negro.
PC veganism must stop. By denying natural tribal proteins for the white soul, white people(lacking in their own red-meat tribalism) end up seeking tribal satisfaction by taking up radical ideologies or OTHER PEOPLE'S tribalisms. It’s like the vegan body, starved of necessary animal proteins, tries to absorb nutrients, vitamins, and minerals from foods that are deficient in them. It is so futile as there is no real substitute for real animal protein and iron. Women especially do much better with some red meat after menstruation.

Likewise, there is no substitute for real healthy race-ism and tribalism for one’s own kind. Jews gorge on the meat of Jewish tribalism, and look how hale and healthy Zionists in Israel are. (The problem with Zionists, as was the case with the Nazis, is that they insist on gorging on the meat of OTHER peoples as well. Jewish uber-predators aren't content with their own blood-and-soil and must feed on the blood of other volks in imperialist mode.) But because whites are denied white meat and must stick to PC vegan diet, their tribal-protein-starved bodies desperately seek substitute-tribalist-nutrients from ideologies(that never quite satisfy tribal cravings) and OTHER TRIBALISMS, e.g. whites trying to be black in attitude or taking up the black cause against fellow whites. Or, among the cucky-wucks of Conservative Inc., it’s usually about vicariously sharing in the Triballistics of Jews and Israel. As whites aren’t allowed white identity and interests(deemed ‘toxic’ as ‘white supremacist’), whites conservatives seek substitute tribalism in ‘civic nationalism'(which has become useless in overly diverse America) or Zionism(which has no benefits for whites whatsoever). Or, they seek tribal satisfaction in the atomized tribalism-of-one, aka libertarian individualism. But as humans are social animals, individualism alone never satisfies one’s needs.

Whites must learn to eat tribal and race-ist protein again.

Healthy ideology is like the food pyramid. At the bottom(the foundation), there should be tribal identity, the blood and soil thing. Above that, there should be tradition and culture. At the next level, there should be freedom and individualism, and so on.
We all need some degree of idealism. But for white folks, the pyramid has been inverted. Idealism or individualism makes for solid base for complex society. It is too abstract to serve as support system for all else. In contrast, blood-and-soil is real and tangible. It’s like existence comes before idealism. If you favor idealism over existence, it means that, when push comes to shove, you may well choose idealism & death over realism & survival. What people need as fundamentals are Blood, Soil, and Saga. The power of story is important as identity alone doesn't say much. What does it mean to say "I'm Jewish" or "I'm Irish" if you don't know the story and narrative of your people? Identity alone is like knowing your name but being amnesiac about your life story. Blood and Soil, yes, but also the Tale.

Consider the tale retold by Joseph Campbell about becoming what you really are.

http://portalofconsciousness.com/the-goats-and-the-tiger/

So the little one is getting that message; he’s picked up and taken to the tiger’s den, where there are the remains of a recently slaughtered gazelle. Taking a chunk of this bloody stuff, the big tiger says, “Open you face.” The little one backs away, “I’m a vegetarian.” “None of that nonsense,” says the big fellow, and he shoves a piece of meat down the little one’s throat. He gags on it. The text says, “As all do on true doctrine.” But gagging on the true doctrine, he’s nevertheless getting it into his blood, into his nerves; it’s his proper food. It touches his proper nature. Spontaneously, he gives a tiger stretch, the first one. A little tiger roar comes out—Tiger Roar 101…. The big one says, “There. Now you’ve got it. Now we go into the forest and eat tiger food.” Vegetarianism Is the first turning away from life, Because life lives on lives. Vegetarians are just eating something that can’t run away.

In Defense of Bio-Socialism as Foundation of Family Formation — Free & Bad vs Unfree & Good — Pitfalls of Christian Sanctimony

Marriage of Feminism and Consumerism was bound to lead to miscarriages of biological justice.

In tandem, they go against nature and upset the organic balance of life and society.

To better illustrate this, imagine 4 people: 2 men and 2 women.

Suppose there are 2 well-paying jobs.

First, we need to take human nature into consideration: Men will marry women without jobs, but women don't want to marry men without jobs.

These are the possible outcomes.

Scenario 1. Two men get the jobs. Each man can afford to raise a family, and each is willing to marry a woman without a job. So, each man marries a woman. As a result, two men have jobs and they have wives with whom to raise a family. Everyone gets something. Men have jobs and wives, women have husbands, wives have family. Two incomes support two families.

Scenario 2. One man and one woman get the jobs. Each can afford a family. The man with the job marries the woman with the job. In contrast, the man without the job cannot a find a mate because women don't want men without jobs. So, the woman without the job doesn't marry the man without the job.
As the man with the job and woman with the job married, both of their incomes serve just one family. Meanwhile, the man without the job has no money and no family. And the woman without the job doesn't want to marry the man with no job, so she has nothing too.
So, we have all the good stuff in one family and nothing for the other man and woman. Also, because both the married man and married woman work, there is a chance that they will have no kids or just one kid. All that combined income goes to serve very narrow interests. Two get it all, the other two get nothing.

Scenario 3. One man and one woman get the jobs. Each can afford a family. The man with the job marries the woman without a job. In contrast, the woman with the job remains unmarried because she doesn't want to marry the man without a job. Under this formulation, three get something while the man without a job get nothing. The man with a job has a wife, the woman without a job, and they can have a family. The woman with a job has money even if no husband. She has no family but she has money to have fun with. But, the man without a job has no money and no wife. Such a man is destined for something like White Death.

Scenario 4. Two women get the jobs, and that means the two men have no jobs. Since women don't want to marry men without jobs, the women blow all their incomes on themselves in unfettered consumerism. They don't want to have families with 'loser' men with no jobs. Since the two men got no jobs, they lack status, pride, and hope.

Of the four options, only #1 offers something for everyone.

#3 isn't so terrible since 3 out of 4 get something.

#2 is awful because 2 get everything while 2 get nothing. Still, its saving grace is there is the formation of at least one family.

#4 is horrible because 2 get everything but there is no family. All that money is spent on fleeting vanity and hedonism.

Now, one might hope for a world where 4 people can have 4 good jobs, but such a world doesn't exist. There is only a limited number of jobs that can support families.

When women entered the work force in big numbers, they took away lots of good jobs from men. Every woman who got a good job robbed a man not only of a job but of a family. When a man takes a job from a woman, he doesn't take away her chance of having a family because men with jobs will marry women without jobs.
When women take jobs from men, it leads to men losing their market value as marriage prospects. Women not only take the jobs from men but also the hope of marriage and family, the most important thing in life(because people, as life-forms, are created from families and pass down their genes and memory by forming their own families); after all, it's no big deal to quit one job to take another, but it'd be terrible to dump one's family and go off with someone else. Also, in one's golden years, what does a man or woman think back on? Family(children and grandchildren) OR some 9-to-5 job he once had, some consumer item he once owned, or something he once ate at a restaurant? True meaning of human life comes from family, through which the continuity of life, culture, and memory is preserved.

When women have high-paying jobs, their standards go up in the mating game. But since fewer men will have good jobs because women took them, the 'ideal man' will be harder to find. So, women with jobs face a drought in marriageable men. Since they only want to marry successful men and will not settle for anything less, many women would rather blow all their earnings on vanity and self-indulgence. So, the income that, in the hands of a man, could have supported a family ends up serving the vain piggery of a woman hooked to SEX AND THE CITY lifestyle.
Capitalist Feminism is not about the equality of anything EXCEPT the equal(even preferential)opportunity for intelligent and/or attractive women to rise as high as possible to find superior men to be with or submit to. It's about the elitism of seeking liberation from 'beta-males' to be with 'alpha-males'. The psychology of capitalist feminism is essentially quasi-polygamist. Women are encouraged to feel that most men are not good enough for them and seek out the super-male as depicted in FIFTY SHADES OF GREY. Capitalist Feminism is less about liberation per se than liberation from the 'average guy' in search of the 'superior guy' to submit to. It is, ultimately, profoundly hierarchical and exclusionary. Given that people do want the best, such psychology among women is not surprising, but the social consequences of Capitalist Feminism have been devastating to the Modern World.

How did we end up like this? It's because we forgot the lesson that we are, first and foremost, sentimental organisms or life-forms. The role of life-form is to sustain itself. Everyone will die one day and so will his/her loved one, the partner in life. So, how do they 'survive' after death? Through their children who, as continuations of their forebears' genetic lineage, are cultural/personal torchbearers of the community. That's what Judaism has been about, indeed how it got started. It was about remembrance of ancestors by descendants, and it all went back to the Covenant.

Now, we are more than mere life-forms like animals. We have advanced brains that produced and have a need for ideas, values, and culture. Still, all those precious things exist and matter because of the living. All the books in the world mean nothing without people to read them, and every person is the product of a man and a woman(unless we create a BRAVE NEW WORLD scenario of cloning operations by the state). We are more than biology, but it begins with and is made possible by biology. Without biology, there is no being.
And the main source of meaning is in the family since every person was created by a father and a mother and since every person can only 'live on' after death through the DNA passed down to his/her kids who are also the cultural/personal torchbearers of their parents' memory.

But for some reason, the cult of narrow individualism made us forget that every individual is a 'continual', merely one link in the long chain of life. He didn't pop out of a book or materialize out of thin air or come into existence as a figment of someone's muse. Every person is born biologically and become human emotionally.
Because we are surrounded by books, movies, and fantasy, we seem to think reality can be constructed via imagination, 'creativity', or wish-fulfillment. Look at all those families where kids are raised to care more about Disney movies and HARRY POTTER books than about real people around them and those who came before them. (Or, too many people assume that, even if they don't have families and create the new generation, SOMEONE ELSE will. But the chances are, other people think the same way, leaving it up to OTHERS to pass the torch of life and culture.) We've replaced creation with creativity. It's no wonder we've come to accept something like 'gay marriage'. We confuse reality with fantasy, as if the world is created and sustained by Peter-Pan-ism. We confuse production of fantasy with reproductive fact. So, if two lesbians want to believe that they 'had a kid' together, we better go along with this charade. If a man says he is a 'woman', we are expected to agree. After all, how care we pop his bubble of desire? If a bunch of freaks want to turn the study of sexes into a hair-splitting game of ever-multiplying 'genders', we are supposed to accept it as cutting-edge 'science'.

As for consumerism, it divorced pleasure from purpose. Life-forms feel pleasure of food and sex because they must eat to survive and must have sex to produce new life. But consumerism created technologies that allowed wanton eating and wanton sex for pleasure alone. So, gluttony became the New Normal, as with fatso Lena Dunham who gorges on cakes while sitting on the toilet. It's as if she has to eat and excrete at the same time. And like an animal, she humps everyone, and she can sustain such behavior because there are contraceptives, pills, and abortion. Gluttony and Sluttony gone out of control in this one gross woman. This kind of porno-propaganda or 'pornoganda' has become America's main cultural message to the world. America is an exceptional country? Or an excessive cunt-ry?

Also, the idea of freedom has become nihilistic. It's good to be free, but for what purpose? In the end, we must make use of our freedoms. And in making any decision, we are choosing one freedom and losing the others. If we choose to study medicine, we don't have much time to study other things. We must commit to mastering the practice of medicine. If we study chemistry, we must neglect many other fields. If we decide to read a book, then we can't read another book. We have only so much time and energy at any given moment. So, even though we want freedom, every choice 'imprisons' us within one endeavor and locks out all the rest. It's like the scene in the first SUPERMAN movie. If Superman is to save one bunch of people, he can't save another bunch of people. He can't do everything. He fails to save Lois Lane and brings her back to life only by cheating.

So, we must raise the question as to what is more important than freedom. We must ask, what is the main purpose and meaning of life? Is it better to be free & choose not to do what one must or be unfree & have no choice but to do what one must? To the extent that prisons exist, we obviously don't believe in unfettered freedom. Those who use freedom badly go to jail as they are deemed unfit to enjoy freedom as a right. Of course, a libertarian would argue that a criminal must be locked up because his misuse of freedom violates the freedoms of others. In contrast, a man or a woman who commits his/her life to idiotic fun than grows into a mature person and has a family hasn't committed a crime or interfered with other people's freedoms. If we take a narrow individualist view, that is true enough, but if we take a deeper & wider civilizational view, such a man or woman has done a grave wrong to society. If such selfish people are few and far between, it's not a problem, but when they come to comprise a vast proportion of the population, the result is the demographically declining West and dying Japan. Freedom is good, but it is not the highest good.

After all, suppose there's a society where everyone is forced to be a husband or a wife. They are all forced to have families and to devote their main energies toward taking care of their children, the next generation.
Next, suppose there is another society where everyone is free and uses his/her freedom to only indulge himself/herself and not have families.
In the end, isn't the former society ultimately better off since it has families that create new life to carry on the torch? It lives on and sustains itself.
In contrast, what good is the other society in the long run? Sure, freedom is nice and individuals(esp in their youth) can have a good time, but if people used their freedoms to mainly indulge themselves and leave behind no legacy(like so many hedonistic white folks are doing today), is that a meaningful life? And how can there be meaning in the future if there are no new people to strive for meaning?

Now, we want freedom, but we need to use that freedom responsibly, soberly, and wisely. Sadly, everything about our ideology and culture fills our eyes, ears, hearts, and minds with the wrong lessons and vile temptations(designed to lead to addictions). If Lena Dunham, madonna, Emma Sulkowicz, and Ashley Judd are the 'role models' for womenfolk, it's no wonder our society is so diseased and dying. Indeed, even Stalinism or Sharia is better for women. After all, the Muslim Order, repressive as it is, has lasted for over one thousand years. For how much longer can the current debauched and degenerate West last? No matter one's elaborate theorizing about justice and the good life, if those ideas result in a civilization that fails in the most basic tasks of life-making and cultural preservation, they are BAD ideas.
In the end, the worth of a civilization isn't measured by trending ideas or fashionable values. It is measured by its ability to survive and continue. The current West smugly(and sometimes shrilly) pontificates about 'Western Values' as the 'most evolved', but if they lead to socio-demographic decline and demise, the test of time will have proven them to be the wrong values. It's like medicine. No matter what the researchers and doctors say, if it kills the patient, it's more poison than medicine. (Also, keep in mind that 'Western Values' are like the 'Constitution'. Those with the Power get to define what they mean. Jews who currently control the world say 'Western Values' are about Diversity, Homomania, Jungle Fever, Jew-worship, and hating-whitey. It's like Jews say the US Constitution guarantees 'gay marriage'.)

Now, we are not saying that the only viable choices are Western decadence/excess and something like Sharia Law. There is something sane, healthy, and balanced in between. We don't need to see the world in stark terms of either Sharia or Gayria/Whorea. It's like Aldous Huxley in BRAVE NEW WORLD REVISITED called out his mistake in the novel BRAVE NEW WORLD of having presented only two possibilities: Either neo-primitive brutality or orgy-porgy techo-hedonism.

We can have both freedom and meaning.
As life-forms, we are made by biological processes that allow for families to pass down the genetic code, keep alive the memory of ancestors, and preserve the culture/heritage. Family is bio-socialist. The essence of socialism is the subordination of absolute individualism to serve the greater need of the whole community. So, even though taxing the rich at higher rates than others is 'unfair' by libertarian principles, it is deemed necessary by socialism because the rich can afford to pay more for the GOOD of society. Socialism takes into consideration the difference between being rich, being middle income, and being poor. It doesn't just regard everyone as an individual. In a similar vein, bio-socialism takes into account that men and women aren't identical and/or interchangeable individuals on the basis of abstract theories, no more than atoms are individual-and-independent actors in chemistry. Atoms, as parts of a molecule, are always interdependent with other atoms, each of which has a specific role in any chemical combination. If not, there would be no difference between CO and CO2. If atoms are merely independent players, the only difference between CO and CO2 would be that the latter has MORE atoms. But in fact, the chemical formula for CO is deadly to life whereas C02 feeds life.

It's not just about individuals and choice. Men and women are life-forms born into existence by a certain biological process, develop ideally in a sound family environment, and whose legacy is assured by forming families of their own and having children(who will, in time, do the same). So, family must be recognized as the foremost bio-socialist unit in our formulation of what is best for society. In the aforementioned four scenarios of 2 men and 2 women competing for jobs and love in society, bio-socialism will favor the scenario of 2 men getting the jobs since everyone will get something. 2 jobs held by 2 men can support 2 families.

But the family has come under attack by capitalist feminism and other nut-job ideologies. Also, the role of mother has been mocked as 'having babies' as if that is all a woman does: Laying babies like a chicken laying eggs. In fact, babies soon grow into children, and raising a child is about molding him or her into a human with mind, heart, ideas, values, and etc. Every day, millions of new neurons are added to children's brains, and the process of their growth is amazing. Besides, what is ultimately more rewarding for a man and a woman to create than another thinking & feeling human being with heart and soul? Besides, all the products and services offered by professions and jobs exist only to serve human beings. So, creating and developing a new human being is the richest experience in life. It is the foundation of everything. The fact that the current West suppresses the creation of new life and relies on OTHER parts of the world to supply more life goes to show how decrepit our society has become. What good are 'Western Values' if they can't even encourage the creation of new life to carry on with the civilization? Progs say non-Westerners will come to the West, take on Western Values, and carry on. Even if we tell ourselves this is true(though it is not), won't Western Values eventually destroy the newcomers as well because they will be similarly affected and quit creating new life as their white predecessors? Globalist logic of 'Western Values' is like a death cult. You can have more freedom and more stuff to enjoy yourself, but the chances are you won't produce life and will die alone in misery. Therefore, newcomers from the Third World must be taught to carry on with Western Civilization, but then, even if everything according to plan, they will become just as non-productive as whites and fade away, requiring yet more newcomers to take up the slack. It's sort of like the scenario in LOGAN'S RUN where people can have a real Good Time as youthful citizens but must die before they get old so that a new batch of young people can take over. There is no sense of continuity. There's a reason why most of science-fiction offers dystopias than utopias. Technology is no substitute for life.

Life matters. It is why Michael Corleone says at the beginning of GODFATHER III that the most precious things in this world are children. "The only wealth in this world is children, more than all the money and power on Earth. You are my treasure." No matter how much wealth and power Michael accumulates, he will one day die, and then the ONLY people who will remember and care about him are his survivors, his children and grandchildren. His money, mansions, cars, and jewelry have no mind, no heart, no nothing... just like all the dead objects collected by Charles Foster Kane, after whose death, they will be disposed of or sold off to strangers. Only life loves, values, and remembers life.
But in our world, the Ideal is for a guy with well-paying job to marry a woman with a well-paying job(which means one less man with a well-paying job who can afford a family), and since both are too busy with work, the moral-and-mental development of the children is left to PC ideologues(teacher hacks) and the Mammon of Pop Culture that corrupts children from a young age.

The modern world is great for giving us freedoms that our ancestors didn't have and didn't know how to have(or what to do with them). And initially, modern people had both freedom and meaning, a sense of liberty and purpose. They were freed from traditional bonds but still morally and culturally informed by those bonds and values. It's like Michael Corleone has freedoms that his forbears didn't have in Old Sicily, but having grown up in a culture of family and values his sense individuality is informed by those bedrock values centered around family, life, and tradition. He has freedom but also cultural compass.

But as the cult of freedom took on a life of its own via ideological arrogance and hedonistic excess, the connection to a sense of purpose was lost.
Ideology gave people a sense of permanence through ideas when, in fact, ideas only exist in the organic minds of people as life forms. No people, no ideas. Ideas are nothing without minds to appreciate them, and minds are bio-mass of living matter.

If ideology filled people with a false sense of permanence via books & arts, entertainment made people feel that the Moment is Forever. Thus, people lost sight of the larger sense of time and history as they became hooked to pop music, TV, and movies that glorify the orgiastic hysterics of the moment. Humans went from organismic to the orgasmic. So, even middle aged men and women still feel like teenagers as they listen to pop music, watch Hollywood movies about caped heroes, or play dumb video games. And abortion has turned into child sacrifice on the altar of Orgasm-over-Organism.

We need to find a way to reconnect freedom with meaning and purpose.
The pussyhat feminists bitch and whine about 'freedom', as if Trump is going to turn them all into chattel slaves. But in fact, the real problem women face today is the sheer lack of meaning and purpose with all their misguided freedoms. They have freedom, but the choices they've made are terrible, not least because our reigning ideology and culture encourages women to act like tramps in SEX AND THE CITY, Lena Dunham, Miley Cyrus, Emma Sulkowicz, or one of those trashy shallow pseudo-intellectuals who write for NYT or yammer on NPR.

In a way, the oddly perverse alliance of feminists and Muslims suggests at something repressed within the modern feminist psyche. There is something deep inside that is crying out for meaning, order, purpose, and continuance. Is it any surprise that Lindsey Lohan and Sinead O'Connor are leaning toward Islam?

The history of mankind has offered people four basic choices:

1. Forcing people to do what is the right thing.

2. Forcing people to do what is the wrong thing.

3. Giving people freedom, and people freely doing the wrong thing.

4. Giving people freedom, and people freely doing the right thing.

The best of all possible worlds will have most people in #4 mode.
The worst of all possible worlds will have most people in #3 mode.

Now, why is #3 worse than #2? Why is a world where people are forced to do the wrong thing better than one where people freely do the wrong thing?
Because in the #2 scenario, there is still a political/social power that can make people do the right thing under a new policy. It is currently forcing people to do the wrong thing, but with a change of course, the system can correct its ways and force the people to do the right thing.
In contrast in the #3 scenario, the people have the freedom/power to do the wrong thing, and there is no higher power to stop them or correct them. This is why black problem today is worse than black problem during slavery. During slavery, whites forced blacks to be slaves, the wrong thing. And slavery had to end. But since whites still had the power, they could make blacks do the right thing with the end of slavery. In contrast, the corrupt and free blacks of today won't listen to anything since they got Agency and Power. But to do what with them? For many blacks, freedom means turning cities into more Detroits and Baltimores. Since the 1960s, blacks used their freedom to turn entire communities into neo-jungles and to bitch, whine, and holler like mad baboons. And since they have all the freedoms and rights under the law, they can just go on acting loutish.
In contrast, blacks in Cuba are in scenario #2. Cuban-style Socialism premised on Marxism-Leninism doesn't really work. It is the wrong thing. It keeps blacks doing what is economically backward and inefficient. However, the state still has control over the blacks, so if state policy were to change one day for the better, blacks can be pressured to do the right thing. In contrast, a lot of American blacks are hopeless. They got the power and freedom, but they use it for total lunacy and jungle behavior. And there is no power above them to say NO. Freedom can liberate but also corrupt, and there is nothing worse than corruption-under-freedom. Unlike corruption-under-tyranny where the people can't be blamed(as they must do as told), corruption-under-freedom means the people themselves freely chose to be vile and venal.

One might say #1 and #4 have same results and so are equally valid. Whether people are forced to do the right thing OR use their freedom to do the right thing, the end result is people doing the right thing. Still, we want freedom. We don't want to be forced to do things. We want liberty(or at least its semblance) than tyranny.

Under system #1, even those who want to do the wrong thing have no choice but to do the right thing.
Under system #4, those with the freedom to do the wrong thing still choose to do the right thing. That is true morality, but it's increasingly harder to come by these days because of family breakdown, cultural decadence, moral degeneration, and etc. After all, in order for people to freely do the right thing, they must be inculcated with good, sound, and healthy values, outlook, and understanding. But just look at the state of PC and Pop Culture. We are raising kids to be self-absorbed tards and snowflakes and loons. Why do so many kids get tattoos? They have no sense of time, of tomorrow and the long-term. They don't think, "Years will pass, and I will regret putting this ugly shit on my skin." No, all they care about is the NOW. If they think it's cool NOW, they must get it and the hell with tomorrow. And if they come to hate their own tattoos, they thinking adding more will fix the problem. What idiots.

In order for #4 to work, we need a society that promotes culture and values of maturity, sobriety, dignity, and integrity, like what Vito Corleone had(except for his role in organized crime, but then he was pressured into that life by thug Fanucci who was fleecing the neighborhood).
But if #4 is rendered impossible because our culture creates tons of idiots with PC and junk culture, then the only option is to go back to #1.

#1 is unpleasant even if it forces people to do the right thing because we want to be free and want people to do the right thing out of moral sense than out of social coercion. Still, #1 is the only option when #4 fails and slides us into a state of #3. The black American community, at this point, can be fixed only through the #1 option. Too many blacks have freely chosen to be total tards and stupid chillun.

Life is a form of energy.
The modern world has tons of energy made possible by electricity. Look at Earth at night from space, and entire areas are lit up with vast networks of electricity. We see the most lights in Western nations and East Asian nations. So much industrial and recreational energy... and yet, so little life energy, so little energy of reproduction. Modern folks are like moths before an artificial light. They are addicted to the false life of industrial energy that fills them with bright light, convenience, and entertainment, but they have lost the sense of real energy, that of life itself, the source of all things. Because industrial energy is so powerful and dazzling, those huddled around it feel so alive, but it's all an illusion. Watching TV filled with flashing images or playing some roller-coaster video-game may feel vibrant and alive, but it's all an illusion. Being around all that industrial energy has sapped modern man of life energy, that of family and creation of new life for legacy.

In contrast, the dark continent of Africa is having lots of kids and producing lots of life. They lack in industrial energy but they have something far more valuable: life energy.
And they will eventually move to the modern world with its aging and dying populations who prefer the artificial 'life' of industrial energy over the real energy of life around family and culture. The problem with black Africans is they have much in life energy but little in moral-and-mental energy that can shape life energy into meaning and purpose. Black behavior is in the mode of hump-and-jump, hardly different from those of chimpanzees and baboons.

Some people say we need to return to Christian values, but it's complicated. For starters, Christianity has always been a mixed blessing.
Christianity is like coal. It offers lots of spiritual heat and moral warmth. But it has to be handled with care with good ventilation. Why? What does coal produce? Carbon Monoxide or CO which is odorless and lethal.
The Church needs a good ventilation system. Yes, the Church teaches white folks to love mankind and be forgiving, and etc. That is a good message to warm the soul. But too much of anything is never any good. And excessive utopian save-the-world sermonizing of Christians can have the effect of CO.
So, we need to ventilate the Church. Give us the sermon about love and forgiveness, but air out the excess sanctimony that 'toxifies' people with holier-than-thou pied-piper-ism of racial extinction. Also, Christians need to be reminded that Jesus never said the world of man could be saved. He only said that man should try to be good and seek the Lord's grace in the afterlife.