From Russia Today: Attempts to diminish the triumph of Apollo 11 and to reassign credit don’t just taint the 50th anniversary of the moon landing, but presage the technological decline of the US if it persists with identity politics. With the Founding Fathers now rarely mentioned in the media without side notes about their slave ownership, and the Betsy Ross flag offensive to Colin Kaepernick and Nike, there is nothing new about liberal attempts to strike at the very heart of American identity. But – leaving aside the conspiracy theorists – the moment Neil Armstrong stepped on the surface of the Moon on July 20, 1969 was objectively such a universal milestone that to qualify it seems a fight against human endeavor itself. It would seem like the more logical route, for those who resent that this was a feat of white un-woke America, would be to try and diminish their role in favour of supposedly unsung heroes. HIDDEN FIGURES, the Oscar-winning film from 2016 was the perfect archetype of this revisionist history, exaggerating and fictionalizing the role of a cadre of politically suitable black women, who did an entirely replaceable job and were no more important than thousands of others involved.
This just goes to show that white give-and-give policy urged by Jews proved to be utterly destructive to America.
Naturally, the world should operate on the basis of give-and-take: Whites give but also take & Non-whites take but also give. But with Jewish ascendancy in the US, they pushed a take-and-take policy for themselves while enforcing give-and-give policy on whites. And whites fell for this. By groaning about 'antisemitism', Jews insisted that they could criticize and shit on others but OTHERS, esp whites, cannot criticize and shit on Jews. When Israel pulled the infamous USS Liberty Attack, it was a clear case of take-and-take on the part of Jews. They not only got away with bloody murder but pushed the US into a defensive and accommodating position of weakness. No apology from Israel. No admittance of guilt. Instead, white America had to swallow its pride and just go along with Jewish BS that it was all just an innocent mistake, nothing more to see folks, so just move along.
At some point in US history, conscientious(and affluent) White America sought a give-and-take understanding & compromise with non-whites. For example, White America would learn to 'give' by admitting to blacks that slavery was wrong in the Land of the Free. But White America also insisted on the 'take' from black America. Blacks would have to admit that, despite their tragic history in the US, they also made great gains and attained opportunities non-existent for blacks who remained in ugabuga Africa. Despite their suffering, blacks did gain a foothold in the most advanced nation on Earth fated for great things.
Same give-and-take understanding developed between whites and American Indians. True, whites would admit that American Indians lost their sacred hunting grounds to the white invaders. But Indians would also admit that whites built a civilization that Indians could not have on their own. So, neither whites nor non-whites monopolized all the righteousness.
Whites were willing to 'give' more on the basis of reciprocity. If whites offered more(in material or moral concessions), non-whites would appreciate the gesture of 'give' on the part of whites. They wouldn't just 'take' but 'give' back to whites an acknowledgement that whites were sincerely trying to redress past wrongs, therefore urging both sides to bury the hatchet and learn to live together. The best example of such give-and-take sentiments was when Japanese-Americans who lost property during World War II were offered an apology and financial compensation. It was done more in the spirit of national healing than righteous indignation.
But Jews didn't play by this game. They were into take-and-take mode. They made demands on whites but never gave an inch to whites. Jews never admitted their role in Western Imperialism and slave trade. Their role in communism and organized crime. Their role in corruption and espionage, such as slipping Josef Stalin the secrets to the Bomb. They made demands on White America to support Zionism without ever saying 'thank you'. But then, why should whites have expected much in the way of conscience among Jews when most Jews, 'liberal' or 'conservative', have expressed zero conscience about what they'd done to Palestinians(and Ukrainians in the 'Holodomor'). Jews used take-and-take with Palestinians, and if White America were smart, it would have woken up to the possibility that Jews would come to regard White America as the Next Palestine with Whites as the 'Next Palestinians' and non-white mass-invaders as the invasive proxies of Jewish Globalists.
Granted, Jews made great contributions to America in fields of science, medicine, technology, and etc, but most such achievements were to increase Jewish power and influence than serve All America, white or non-white, as a whole. Consider the sheer concentration of power and wealth in Jewish hands esp since the 60s. It's the result of Tribalesse Oblige.
Because whites submitted to give-and-give mode in relation to take-and-take Jews, such has become the New Template for all other groups who've decided to learn from and copy the Jews, the most powerful people in the world. Booker T. Washington was a give-and-take Righteous Negro when he wrote the book UP FROM SLAVERY. Even while reminding whites of slavery's injustice, he acknowledged the opportunities and freedoms opened up to blacks as the result of the contact between white world and black world. He called upon whites to do more for blacks but also insisted upon blacks to make the most of the freedoms availed to them. Thus, reality was not a matter of absolute right and absolute wrong, of total white and total black. Indeed, such was also the attitude of victorious Northern whites over Southern whites after the Civil War. Even as the Northern Yankees pushed their own righteous narrative of preserving the Union and ending slavery, they also conceded that many Southern men fought with bravery, honor, and own sense of loyalty.
But Jews saw things differently. For one thing, as their long-term goal wasn't merely assimilation or accommodation with whites but total takeover and domination, they had to totally neutralize and devalue whiteness as a matter of pride and self-worth. Jews were especially rabid and virulent because they could only be a minority ruling elite without solid majority-demographic foundation. Jews studied history and know that minority ruling elites are generally faded to fall. British rule couldn't last forever in India. Whites eventually yielded power in South Africa. Turkish minority elites ceded non-Turkish territories with the fall of the Ottoman Empire. Even before that, they relinquished Greece once the Hellenics organized and resisted en masse. And the fates of Jewish elites in Europe, whether capitalist or communist, were often uncertain and unstable. Jews were once the dominant economic players in Hungary, Poland, and parts of Germany, but times of crisis changed all that. Jewish Bolsheviks once ruled Russia but lost out to other more numerous groups. (Jews had no tribal defenses against goyim under communism because, even as communism criminalized 'antisemitism', it also made it difficult for Jews to organize power specifically for Jewish or Zionist interests. Even though communists generally couldn't attack Jews as Jews, they could go after Jews as 'liberals', 'capitalists', 'Zionists', or some such.)
In recognition of all these history lessons, Jews figured that the ONLY WAY to permanently secure power in the US is to (1) totally neutralize whiteness as pride and identity (2) make gentiles so diverse, mixed, and confused in identity that they would never be able to unite against Jewish power. This is why Jews have pathologized whiteness as a kind of sickness so that whites won't dare to organize around that identity; according to Jewish logic, the mere realization of White Identity is 'white supremacism'. It's NOT OKAY to be White. In contrast, when the British Imperialists lorded over the Hindus, they never said Hindus don't have a great and proud culture of their own. If anything, extensive British archaeology and study of Indian history(lost to Indians themselves) revived much of ancient heritage and, if anything, increased Indian pride that would come to serve as the basis of Indian nationalism and resistance against the Brits.
The Dalits or Untouchables of India. Under Jewish Rule, white people are being turned into the filthy Dalit Caste.
Jews learned from the British 'mistake' and have decided to associate whiteness with shame, guilt, and wickedness only. And if European archaeology aided non-whites to reconnect with their own histories and cultures, Jewish globo-homo propaganda says all-things-white don't belong to whites who don't even exist as a race. So, Vikings were Vikangz, the Middle Ages in Europe were not white, and Julius Caesar was a brotha. Jews have decided not to emulate the British Imperialists(who, for all their greatness, sank like a stone when the Time came). Jews have decided to take their cues from the Aryan Brahmins who, unlike the Brits, got to remain in India and rule over the natives for not just a few hundred years but 1,000s of yrs. What was the secret that the Aryan-Brahmin ruling elites had over the natives? They were ingenious theorists of the filthy 'castes'(that more-or-less correlated with race). The ruling elites pushed a dogma that the lower-castes deserved to be on the bottom of the totem pole due to cosmic laws of justice. So, it was not a case of social oppression or economic exploitation. It was deemed by Cosmic Karma itself. Untouchables, for instance, were born into the filthy caste because of the sins of their souls in previous lives. Therefore, it was only right and cosmically just for them to accept their lowly lot and utter lack of pride, indeed as the ONLY WAY to expiate their past sins. If they rebelled against their lot in life and rose up against the upper castes, that wasn't just an act of transgression against social superiors but against the cosmos and gods themselves. In a deeply religious and spiritual society such as India, taboos and magic mattered a lot. Then, it's hardly surprising that this 'wokeness' of late is heavily into witchcraft, New Age nuttery, Magic Negro cult, Holocaustianity, and Globo-Homo Queertianity. If white people got into the habit of thinking rationally and empirically, they would wake up to the reality of what is really going on. This is why Jews push Critical Theory against Critical Thinking. (Critical Theory, despite the label, forbids freedom of thought and insists that academics adopt fixed concepts about race, sex, and culture to understand the world. They are told what and how to think about things in accordance to the manual of a ready-made kit.) Just like magical thinking was necessary to make Hindus, upper and lower castes, believe in the justness of Untouchables remaining in their allotted roles without complaint and resistance, it is Hocus-Wokus that has so many people, whites and non-whites alike, spellbound by Magical Thinking that says Whiteness is a kind of spiritual and cosmic disease that requires whites to be totally ashamed and non-whites to be totally anti-white(even if they came to the West to be with white folks). Jewish policy toward whites is like Aryan-Brahmin policy toward the darker-skinned lower castes of India: "You whites are spiritually and cosmically contaminated, and therefore, your kind deserve NO pride and must accept your filthy lot, and the ONLY WAY you can atone for your sins is by serving the holier groups, esp. Jews, Negroes, and Homos." (Being homo is so magical that even Filthy Whites become semi-holy if they are into bung-donging.) So, just like the darker-skinned native of India DESERVED to be invaded by the Aryans who took over Brahmin roles, Hocus-Wokus or Wokus-Pocus says whites are so unworthy that they don't deserve to own anything to call their own: Lands, wealth, bodies, and souls. But then, they have no souls as far as Jews are concerned.
Sean Penn as Kleinfeld in CARLITO'S WAY. Beware of the Fiendish Chutzpastic Jew.
Will Patton as Homo Deep Stater in NO WAY OUT. Beware of the pathological Homo.
Anyway, before whites bitch about blacks, Muslims, and others, they need to square things with Jews, the very first people with whom they developed a fatal give-and-give relationship. The chutzpastic Jewish Way was to demand and demand, take and take, and never give an inch. Now, if Jews were a bunch of 'losers' like Eskimos or Native Hawaiians, then indulging their arrogance wouldn't have amounted to much. It'd be indulging some wino-bum on the street. But when whites opted for take-and-take relationship with such a powerful, intelligent, insistent, and influential people such as the Jews, the appeasement was bound to turn Jews into little hitlers. When whites pretty much let Jews get away with espionage for the USSR and the USS Liberty attack, Jews began to smell blood of white weakness and cravenness. When whites aided Jewish invasion of Palestine, it was akin to UK acceding to Germany's takeover of Czech territory. But at least UK woke up to the true nature of Nazi Germany when Hitler invaded Poland. But white America and white Europe kept on appeasing Jews even after so many Jewish crimes in finance, cultural degradation, radical ideologies, and insane foreign policy(esp after the Cold War). Ironically, the very people who make the most noises about the evil Nazis are now acting most like the evil Nazis of old.
Blacks were always problematic, but they learned the take-and-take attitude from Jews. And now, many other groups are copping the same attitude(as they can't help noticing take-and-take Jews got so much from whites). We see it among Hindus, Mexicans and Guatemalans, Muslims, and etc. Their rabid and virulent anti-whiteness was learned from the behavior of a certain group, and it was mainly the Jews. And Jews concocted such attitude not to combat injustice and promote equality but to weaken whiteness as a rival power so that Jewish Power would reign supreme. After all, isn't it odd that, even as the mass demographics of America grows more diverse, the elite 'oligraphics' of America grows more Jewish-supremacist by the day(though the full extent of this is shrouded by the fact of Globo-Homo as proxy of Jewish power)?
It's not a given that blacks should be so utterly nasty. Look at Cuba, a nation with history of slavery even more extensive than the US on a per capita basis. But Cuban elites, even or especially under communism, fixed the Narrative so that black Cubans have been made to regard their relationship with whites on a give-and-take basis. Blacks take the narrative of their 'noble suffering under slavery' but also concede that they gained much from the white way and white rule, especially under the Castros. Such black-and-white understanding used to be the arrangement in the US as well, but Jews took over and decided to totally shame whiteness as a special kind of evil so that whites must never take and instead only give-and-give and always concede to the Other. Granted, there are waivers as when whites are encouraged to hate and kill Muslims OVER THERE as the enemies of Holy Israel. When white soldiers drop bombs on Muslims OVER THERE, they are 'heroes' according to Jews. But once the Muslims come OVER HERE, Jews goad them to join the POC brigade and dump on Evil Whitey(the relatives of the white soldiers fighting in Muslim lands) as the source of all problems.
Nothing real is possible until whites finally square things with Jews. No more give-and-give with Jews. The only decent terms between Jews and whites should be give-and-take for both sides. If Jews insist on take-and-take stance vis-a-vis whites(as they've done with Palestinians), whites should fight back in kind by going into take-and-take mode against Jews. And if Jews dig up dirt on evil white history, whites should do likewise and show how Jews ran the finance of Southern Slavery, how Jews colluded with Communist Russia, and myriad other crimes of Jews. And whites should deconstruct Jewishness as a supremacist social construct that says Jews are the favored and chosen of all the human races, i.e. 'Jewish Supremacism' is a redundancy because Jewishness itself is a supremacism.
Now, neither side needs to be so nasty and hostile, but IF Jews insist on playing a virulently anti-white game, white people have no choice but to fight fire with fire... if they are to survive as a race and regain pride(that of late has been associated with homo fecal-penetration and tranny penis-cutting thanks to Jewish-controlled media and deep state). If Jews won't give but only take and take, whites must do likewise with Jews. Never given an inch to those who won't give it themselves.
As for white domination of the space program in both Russia and the US, it's a historical fact that whites were far ahead of rest of mankind in science and technology. That's a historical fact, not a matter of historical injustice. It's like there were lots of Jewish nuclear-physicists because many brilliant Jews went into such field. Things may change in the coming years, especially with rise of Chinese and Hindu scientists and engineers, though given IQ differences among groups, it's difficult to imagine blacks will be dominant in those fields. On the other hand, blacks dominate many sports because they have natural advantages in stronger bones, fast-twitch muscles, and other factors. A film like THE RIGHT STUFF(directed by Jewish Philip Kaufman based on book by Wasp Tom Wolfe) had no problem with the whiteness of the American air and space program, but that was still a time before the US was totally taken over by mean-spirited Jews and mentally diseased with PC nonsense that has turned so much of media and academia into Oleannaville.
Sundar Pichai does the bidding of Globo-Homo Zionist-Imperialist Google Jews in crushing the freedoms of whites and Palestinians. It's hardly surprising as Hindus were among the most useful collaborators of the British Empire.
Power isn’t simply about individuals having lots of money or groups having lots of influence. It’s also about alliances, partnerships, and trusts. In the end, what finally led to the fall of National Socialist Germany was the problem of alliances. In 1941, all of Europe except the UK was either allied with Germany, under German control, or neutral. Furthermore, Germany was allied with the Soviet Union. Germany was also allied with Japan. The only major direct threat to Germany was the U.K. that however hadn’t the means to invade or destroy Germany. Nor did it plan to. It was mainly playing defense. If Germany had maintained its alliance with Soviet Union and pressured Japan to come to terms with the US, it could very well have come out on top. Granted, Germany’s alliances were problematic. Soviet Union and National Socialist Germany were ideological enemies; therefore, their ‘friendship’ was cynical than principled, built on mutual fear than trust. Furthermore, Germany’s alliance with erratic and desperate Japan was also deeply problematic. It became alienated from KMT-ruled China that had been favorable to Germany. But worse, there was the danger that Japan might become entangled in a war with the US, into which Germany might be drawn. (However, if Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor BEFORE Germany invaded Russia, it’s unlikely that Germany would have declared war on the US. On the other hand, it’s unlikely that Japan would have attacked the US naval base IF Germany hadn’t already invaded Russia and seemed to be winning.)
Another problem for Germany was the ostensibly neutral USA lurking in the shadows. The Anglo-American elites felt a certain closeness with Anglo-Brits, and besides, FDR and those around him wanted a world war to boost government spending & ramp up the economy, to defeat the Far Right(which was loathed in liberal intellectual circles whose soft spot was for communism), and use the crisis to take over as the new world hegemon. Thus, even though the US didn’t officially enter the war until 1941, it had been aiding the UK behind the scenes to make things tough for Germany. FDR also pushed the anti-Japanese embargo to provoke a war in the Pacific(that would hopefully be linked to the war in Europe). Anyway, the relevant lesson here is that German power rose when its game of diplomacy was careful not to alienate MANY sides at once. To make itself palatable to the capitalist West, Nazi Germany presented itself as the sworn enemy of Soviet Communism. But when relations with the UK and France deteriorated, Adolf Hitler made the masterful plan of aligning with the Soviet Union, the other great power on the continent of Europe. However, when he attacked Russia, he had no major allies left except Japan, which was however no match for the US. Italy was a third-rate power, and with Germany at war with both UK/US and Russia, it was a zero-sum game of win-all or lose-all. Germany lost everything.
Violating this Pact proved to be most fatal to Nazi Germany. It had no major allies left in Europe.
Jewish power is awesome, the most powerful power in the world today. And yet, Jewish power wouldn’t have amounted to much without its crucial alliances with non-Jewish groups, the Gentiles. Granted, Jews don’t so much seek alliances with other peoples as they seek alliances with the elites of other peoples. If anything, Jews seek to suppress the populist-nationalism of most peoples since such passions pressure the ethnic or national elites to represent and lead their own peoples in exchange for their loyalty and support. For example, the Turkish masses want the Turkish elites to serve Turkey and its people. Such nationalism-populism among goyim is threatening to Jewish power because Jews need goy elites to serve as the cuck-collaborators to Jewish Power. Jews need goy elites to suppress & silence their own peoples and form alliance with Jewish elites. In the past, the Jewish underdog-elites sought the graces of the goy top-dog elites, especially when Europe was still mostly ruled by kings and princes. Even back then, Jews tried to nudge goy kings and princes into lending their ears to Jews than to their own subjects. Today, Jewish top-dog elites demand that their goy underdog-elites do everything in their power to suppress & silence the 'siren song' of nationalist-populism. Consider the case of Hungary where nationalism-populism means the people insisting on the preservation of Hungary as the nation for Hungarians. Viktor Orban has heard the nationalist-populist cry and implemented policies and values meant to cement the bond between the Hungarian elites and Hungarian masses. They are also meant to unite the Hungarian future with the Hungarian past, i.e. present-day Hungarians are encouraged to feel a deep sense of bond with their ancestors and land. Now, why are Jews so triggered by this? After all, don’t Jews promote the same themes in Israel that is defined as the eternal homeland for the Jews? Furthermore, as Hungary is friendly with Israel, why are Jews so virulently anti-Hungarian? It’s because the center of Jewish Power is not in Israel but in the global networks within goy nations. Jewish minority elites in goy nations have far more power than Jews in Israel; indeed, the reason why Israel matters so much to the US is because the Jewish minority effectively controls America. Because the main power of Jews depend on Jewish Minority Dominance in goy nations, Jews denounce and denigrate ANY sign of nationalist-populism in goy nations. After all, populism means the Voice of the People, and nationalism means Elites as representatives & defenders of their own nations, peoples, and lands. A nationalist-populist UK would be state where the majority of white Britons demand national sovereignty and security and where the British elites, as the leader-defenders of Great Britain, comply with patriotic demands.
Now, such nationalism-populism wouldn’t necessarily be dangerous to the Jewish community. Plenty of nations have learned to treat their minorities with decency and respect. Indeed, there are no pogroms in Hungary and Russia despite their being on the hate-list of most Jews around the world. If anything, Jews are well-protected there and face no threats. Then, why are Jews so hostile to goy nationalism-populism? It’s because they are now addicted to supremacist power and are no longer content with survival, security, and affluence. Jews are now in neo-imperialist-and-hegemonic mode and want the world as their oyster. Of course, Jews, being ever so clever, play a sleight-of-hand trick with terminology. Even though THEY THEMSELVES are for tribal supremacism, they demean any people who resist Jewish supremacism as ‘white supremacist’ or ‘far right’. So, even though the ONLY thing that Hungary wants is to preserve itself as the national homeland for its ethnic folks, Jews demean Viktor Orban and his supporters as ‘haters’ and ‘neo-Nazis’. Jews spew the same kind of filth against Syria and Assad. Jews in Israel and Zionists in the US can use their muscle to wage Wars for Israel and wreck nation after nation. Israel can have all the nukes it wants while, at the same time, using the US and its puppet-states to sanction the economy of Iran, a nation that has no nukes. We live in a crazy world where Jewish Supremacist-Terrorists accuse others of ‘supremacism’ or ‘terrorism’ for daring to say NO to Jewish greed, perfidy, and monstrosity. It’s like a slave-master calling his slave ‘uppity’ for wanting to be free. If white people desire freedom from Jewish globo-homo-hegemony and imperialism, vile Jews smear them as ‘white supremacist’. Self-determination is to be denied to white people because a free people might say NO to the Jewish globo-homo supremacist agenda. The ONLY way for Jews to ensure white submissivism is to deny and forbid white agency & autonomy. It’s like dogs must be denied their independence IF they are to be trained to serve their human master. If you want to take control of someone’s body, first control his heart and mind. As Jews control media and academia, they fill white goyim with ideas and images devised to subvert white pride, freedom, and independence. Jews are the hands, white goyim are the clay.
If Jews were huge in number and had a sizable nation of their own — like Russia, China, India, Iran, etc. — , they would be less paranoid about power. If there were 500 million Jews in a nation about the size of India, Jews might feel assured of their presence in the world EVEN IF they didn’t control other nations through networks of capital(money) and capitals(elite cities of governance). But the only Jewish-majority nation in the world is Israel, which is tiny despite its historical and spiritual significance as the Holy Land. And this is why Jews are so utterly adamant about sinking their claws deep into other nations. Without control of other nations, especially Anglo-made ones that are most successful in the world, Jewish power wouldn't be so formidable.
Now, why are Jews so insistent on world domination? After all, Armenians also have a small nation and a global diaspora, and they too have done rather well as a ‘middleman community’. Still, when was the last time you heard of Armenians seeking to take control of other nations and the world? Why are Jews so unlike Armenians? There are three reasons: (1) Covenant that makes Jews believe they are the Chosen of God and History. (2) Higher IQ that makes Jews look upon gentiles as dogs and cattle to control. Jews think, "Why should dimwit goyim have so much when WE JEWS are smarter and better? Those dummies should be serving us like cattle and horses exist to serve mankind." (3) Stronger personalities. Jews got chutzpah, a pushy doggedness that is maniacally driven like rats and gophers gnawing or clawing their way through everything. To understand why the Jews do what they do, one needs to think like a Jew. It’s like Michael Corleone in THE GODFATHER PART 2 says that, in order to understand one’s enemies/rivals, he has to put himself inside others’ shoes.
A nation like China or Russia doesn’t need to take more land to feel big or important. Even though Russia has interests beyond its borders and even though China is eager to expand its economic reach, both nations are important on their own. Like the US, they are almost like empires unto themselves. They don’t really need the world to be world powers. In contrast, a smaller nation like UK needed an empire in order to be great. Indeed, without an empire, the name ‘Great Britain’ is rather amusing. Even with the fall of worldwide communism and the breakup of the Soviet Union, Russia still remains the biggest nation on Earth with a sizable population. And even in Maoist isolation and poverty prior to its turn to market economy and entry into the global capitalist system, China was an important nation that had to be reckoned with. In contrast, Great Britain and France without their empires could not be great powers. They could be prosperous nations and advanced economies but nothing more. Same goes for Germany and Japan. Despite their big economies, their presence on the world stage depends utterly on the US for trade, markets, and security. If Germany or Japan were to go to war with the US, they could be destroyed overnight because neither is food-and-energy independent. Their riches totally depend on the thumbs-up of the US as world hegemon.
To an extent, the state of Jewish power is somewhat akin to that of Great Britain as the greatest imperialist power. Great Britain was small, but its ambition was boundless. This led to a contradiction and imbalance in the British character. In a balanced world, a modest-sized nation should have modest ambitions. And there was once a time when the British desired no more than that as they were more concerned about foreign invasions than invading other peoples. But once the British secured their island fortress and mastered sea power, they began to broaden their horizons, especially as their main rival, the Spanish, fell into precipitous decline. France being a continental power concentrated more on army than navy, not least because the European mainland remained a hotbed of military conflicts until the end of World War II. And then, the industrial revolution happened with Great Britain far ahead of other nations. In industrial power, UK was unmatched until the rises of Germany and the (Anglo-founded-and-ruled)USA in late 19th century. Because UK was so far ahead of most of the world, the British got to feeling superior to rest of mankind. They were of a small island nation but so enterprising, smart, innovative, disciplined, rational, and etc. In contrast, most of mankind were lazy, backward, stagnant, incurious, dull-witted, barbarian, or even savage. If the entire world had advanced along with the British, the Brits would have had a more balanced view of the world: "We achieve things, they achieve things. We gain in power, they gain in power." But the Brits began to outstrip most of the world in power and wealth. Especially the non-white races seemed mired in savagery, barbarism, or backwardness. In a balanced world, Indian subcontinent and Imperial China should have been much more powerful than the British. But when the Brits went there, they saw stale civilizations mired in complacency, willful ignorance, superstition, and despotism. British were disciplined but respected the right of individuals. Oriental Civilizations, though advanced to some degree, were all about customs and obedience, leaving no room for progress and reform. The only real exceptions seemed to be the French(though it too began to lag behind Northern Europe and failed to become a truly industrialized nation until after World War II), Germans, and the Americans. But then, the French were long a great people. And Germans were racial cousins of the Anglos. And the US was essentially an extension of Anglo Civilization. A possible non-white exception was Modern Japan, but its rise depended wholly on imitating and copying the West. Could Japan have sparked a social-and-economic revolution on its own? We’ll never know but probably not as it was too regimented and repressive to allow the sort of sparks that led to the industrial revolution in the West.
Russia was another strange case. It was a white European nation but somewhat ‘oriental’ and backward. It seemed capable of advancing like rest of Europe but always seemed to lag behind in technology and organization. And yet, it was so huge. Russia seemed like the exact opposite of UK at least within the white world. Brits were an industrious, capable, and free people in a small nation, whereas Russians were a lazy, messy, and incompetent people in a huge nation. Still, because Russia was so big, the lazy Russians could just rest on their landed laurels and be a great nation(as Napoleon found out when the sheer size of Russia wore his army down). In contrast, the Brits could take nothing for granted because they had to have an overseas empire to be great in power. Russian power could be as ‘slovenly’ as a bear, whereas British power had to be taut as a big cat. Brits always overestimated Russian power, needlessly getting entangled in conflicts of the Great Game that, in the long run, proved to be bad for both sides. America was also a problem for UK though for different reasons. In a way, the US was to UK what Christianity was to Judaism. Jews feel both pride and loathing in relation to Jesus and the religion He birthed. On the one hand, Jews feel awe that one of their own founded a great religion that inflamed the world and captured the hearts and minds of countless goyim. Imagine that, all those millions and millions of goyim kneeling before a Jewish carpenter with odd ideas. On the other hand, Christianity is the God that got away as far as Jews are concerned. As such, Christianity became a competing and then dominant religion over Judaism. Likewise, the Brits felt great pride that their own Anglo kin founded the United States as a new nation with promise and destiny, and indeed, the US grew by leaps and bounds largely because of its core Anglo stock with its know-how and enterprise. And yet, United States was born out of disobedience and, unlike Canada and Australia, developed in direct competition with UK as a potential hegemon. Also, in order to distinguish themselves from their Mother Country(especially as their founding myth was that freedom-loving colonials rebelled against British tyranny and exploitation), Anglo-Americans molded a new identity that de-emphasized their ethnic origins in the British Isles. From the story of Pilgrims to the Founding Fathers to Andrew Jackson(who fought in the War of 1812), the American theme was one of ‘breaking free of British tyranny and the Old World'. It’s no wonder that in World War I and World War II, the British discovered that, even as the Americans were willing to lend a hand, it came with a steep price tag. If the American colonials stiffed the bill to the British Crown after the costly French-and-Indian War, American neo-imperialists in WWI and WWII were most eager to collect every sixpence for services rendered to the Brits. The Tea Party was nothing compared to the Gold Party.
Both Jews and Hindus have had a long experience of dealing with the West. The Jews had it with just about every European group, though they reached the greatest height by serving and then usurping the Anglos, especially Anglo-Americans. Jews also reached great heights in Russia with the Bolshevik Revolution, but egalitarian communism ultimately proved to be antithetical to Jewish talents. Jews also came to prominence in Modern Germany, a key European power, but the friction between Jewish prophetic-radicalism and German counter-prophetic-radicalism burned it all down, leading to destruction of millions of Jews and Germans. In the end, Jews failed in Russia and Germany. And due to the power of class and tradition, Jewish power remained limited in the UK despite its great wealth and influence. It was in the US that Jews finally gained the upperhand, and with the US as the lone superpower, Jews enforced their Judeo-centric will on UK, France, Germany, and etc. Even on Japan that now submits to ‘gay pride’ parades.
Unlike Jews, Hindus mainly experienced the West through a single power, the Anglo-Brits. It was under British Imperialism and through Anglosphere that Hindus were brought to modernity, united into a proto-national entity, educated in London, and ferried across the seas to serve as coolies, middlemen, and soldiers for the British Empire. So, both Jews and Hindus gained a tremendous deal via their contact with Anglosphere(and Anglo-made US). And until the latter half of the Twentieth Century, both groups played a subservient role vis-a-vis the Anglos though the dynamics were already changing fast in early 20th century that saw both the stirring of Zionism and Indian Independence Movement.
But there was a key difference. Indians sought independence from Anglo rule whereas the Jews relied on Anglo-power in the UK and Anglo-American power in the US to make the Jewish nationalist project of Zionism possible. In other words, if the Hindu Movement was for independence from Western Imperialism, Zionism could only succeed under the protection of British Imperialism and American Neo-Imperialism(with support from the USSR as well before Stalin soured of the Jews). Also, if Indian Independence was about kicking whites out of the subcontinent, the founding of Israel was essentially about half-white European Jews, the Semito-Aryans, booting the native Arab browns from what was then Palestine. Granted, Jews had a two-pronged approach in their national aspirations. On the one hand, Jews cajoled and pleaded with Western Imperialist powers to use their ‘white supremacist’ power to aid the Zionists in ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from the bulk of Palestine to be re-branded as Israel. On the other hand, Jews justified the founding of Israel as a sanctuary from 'antisemitism'(and the Next Holocaust) of white folks as intransigent Evil Supremacists. After all, why couldn’t Jews remain in Europe after WWII if Hitler and the Nazis were defeated? Weren’t the Bad Guys gone from the world stage? Apparently, Jews could never be safe in the presence of lots of white people who may one day decide to Go Nazi again to round up innocent Jews for the death camps. So, the argument was Jews needed a homeland AWAY from Evil Whitey... except that the irony was that Jews needed the support of Evil Whitey to lay claim to Palestine and expel 700,000 Arabs from their ancestral lands in a war provoked by Jews.
For this reason, many Hindus have had mixed feelings about Jews and Israel. On the one hand, Hindus appreciate the Jewish Narrative of sanctity borne of victim-hood at the hands of Evil Whitey, but Hindus can’t help noticing that Israel was created essentially as a neo-imperialist enterprise against a brown people. Another difference between Israel and India is, of course, the size. Israel is a tiny nation whereas India, at 1/3 the size of the US, is one of the largest nations. What Jews in Israel and Hindus in India have in common is ethnic diversity, but there is a crucial difference between how Judaism sees Jews and how Hinduism sees Hindus. According to the Covenant, all Jews are equally blessed by God(though to be a certain kind of Rabbi, you need special ancestry, just like in order to be ‘made’ by the mafia, you have to be 100% Italian), whereas Hinduism developed as a complex caste system, the purpose of which was to keep the various Hindus divided by profession, marriage, and residence. It was a spiritualized form of apartheid. Thus, if Judaism was about the unity of Jews, Hinduism was about the divisions among Hindus. Also, if the COVENANT blessed all Jews equally as the Chosen, the Hindu concept of KARMA said some Hindus, those of the uppermost castes, were most favored by the cosmic laws whereas others, those of lower caste and animals, were less favored or disfavored. In this sense, it’s amazing that India has come together as one nation under Hinduism. To be sure, modern Hinduism, like modern Islam, underwent profound changes in order to be palatable to modernity(that has affected every corner of the world). Even the Hindu National Party isn’t for official discrimination against people who were formerly designated as the ‘Untouchables’. Also, introduction of modern democracy has created the impression that ALL Indians take part in the national pageant though, to be sure, India was, up until the 1990s, pretty much a one-party dictatorship like Japan under the Liberal Democratic Party. Though the Hindu National Party initially came to power on the basis of economic issues, it thinks very much like the Israel Likud Party(headed by scoundrely Netanyahu) and Turkish Justice & Development Party(headed by rascally Erdogan). What the Likud and AK(Justice & Development) parties realized is that economic issues aren’t enough. After all, the economy has ups and downs all the time. To gain dominance, a political party or movement has to capture the cultural and ‘spiritual’ loyalty of the populace so that, even during down times, enough voters will stick with the Party out of sentimentality and emotional commitment. In populist politics, irrational power of commitment is greater than rational power of calculation. Consider the power of love. Even in troubled marriages, the spouse may stick through thick and thin out of love. As Tammy Wynette sang, "Stand by Your Man."
And a mother loves her children even they go bad because they’re hers. In religion, why do people stick with faith in God even when so much goes wrong? Why not blame God? They choose not to because God is beyond reason. He is a holy being, the ruler of all that is. This is why a people who gain irrational or ‘spiritual’ power over another people are crucially advantaged. Jews understood this all to well, which is why they used Holocaustianity and the cult of ‘White Guilt’ to make white people look upon Jews as the holy god-race especially blessed by God or History and sanctified by Tragedy. Jews studied human psychology and know that people are drawn to power in two ways: Awe for might & Respect for righteousness. Mere might can lead to awe but also fear and loathing. It’s like we are in awe of earthquakes and hurricanes but also dread them. Mere righteousness can lead to sympathy but also contempt because the meek and powerless come across as pathetic. A far more resilient kind of power combines the display of superiority with righteous sympathy, and Christianity came upon the most potent formula for this kind of power. The Passion of Jesus makes people feel sympathy for the poor decent man who preached love and understanding. The sympathy makes people feel morally righteous. But if Jesus had merely been a good person who got beat, his mission would have been one of the countless lost causes. Also, His humiliation and death would have elicited pity than respect. But the Resurrection of Christ made Jesus out to be the Son of God, the immortal Being. Jesus defeated death, rose to Heaven, and returned to inspire the Disciples. And that was awe-inspiring. Jews understand this dynamics all too well. Jews know that people look up to power & wealth, and Jews of course got lots of power and wealth. But Jews also know that people can easily feel envy and resentment toward the rich and powerful. In Western History, rich Jews had often been targeted, fairly or not, as a bunch of piggish a**holes. ‘Mighteous’ power works more-or-less on a rational basis. Those with power and money win over allies(who want a piece of the pie) but also make lots of enemies. Therefore, Jews figured they needed to shield their ‘mighteous’ power with righteous power. Righteousness is often irrational and ‘spiritual’, especially when a certain people are associated with blessedness in the eyes of God or verdict of History. As Holocaustianity made Jews the righteous race that suffered the ‘greatest horror of all time’, Jewish Power gained both a material-rational and moral-irrational(‘spiritual’) basis. A whole bunch of cuck-collaborators flocked to Jewish Power for a piece of the pie out of rational calculation for material interests, but they've also stuck by Jewish Power out of irrational-‘spiritual’ reasons because the reigning neo-theology of the West made every Jew a kind of christ-figure. Like Jesus was both the great Son of God and a righteous victim, Jews came to be seen as both a triumphant race that can accumulate stinking loads of money and a tragic race that effectively died for the Sins of Western man.
James Woods as Max in ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA. He manages to both take all the money AND become a tragic figure to Noodles.
Marc Chagall: The White Crucifixion
Same goes for the Negroes. Even though much is made of the tragic history of lynching, all this white worship of the Negro has more to do with Negro triumph in sports(as the lone racial superpower of athletics), rap music, and sexual prowess. Whites feel especially sad and guilt-ridden about the black tragedy because they look upon blacks as a god-race(after Jews). American Indians suffered a much greater tragedy than the Negroes(who, if anything, gained so much by having been brought over to the New World), but there isn’t much interest in their tragedy because they’re seen as a bunch of losers. Same goes for all the Muslims who died in Wars for Israel. For most Americans, Muslims are a bunch of worthless good-for-nothing ‘Muzzies’ despite the horrible deaths of 100,000s. And there isn’t much respect for Hindus either.
While plenty of Hindus succeeded as entrepreneurs or professionals in the US, they lack the 'viscerality' of blacks in sports, oratory, and music. Hindu presence in American Culture has mainly been about their funny accents, especially in connection to THE SIMPSONS. Furthermore, whereas white souls have been drummed endlessly with tragic tales about Jews and Negroes, most white folks(especially in the US) know and feel nothing about the tragedy of Indian history. When Hindus bleat on and on about how they too were wronged terribly by Evil Whitey, there is an element of Victim Envy, especially as the cult of White Guilt underlies so much of Western Thinking since the rise of Political Correctness. Of course, all three groups — Hindus, Jews, and Negroes — gained as well as lost in their experience with white peoples, but Jews and Negroes have selectively decided to emphasize their victim-hood at the hands of Evil Whitey. As this factor has imbued Jews and Negroes with so much moral mileage, the often-imitative Hindus want a slice of the White Guilt Pie as well. And for this to work, ALL WHITES must be blamed and made to share in the collective guilt. Notice how not only Anglo/Irish whites with deep lineage in the US but ALL whites in the US are made to atone for Slavery. (Jews are the only ones who are exempt from collective White Guilt about slavery, which is rather hilarious since Jews played a prominent role in the slave trade and in the managing of finances in the Antebellum South.) And notice that both Jews and Hindus blame white Americans for their troubles with OTHER whites. The Shoah was a German thing and, if anything, White America did its part in defeating Nazi Germany, as did the UK. But for some reason, the US Capitol has a Holocaust Museum and all Americans, especially white ones, are made to feel ‘White Goy Christian Guilt’ for what happened to Jews at the hands of Nazi Germans. But the US had NOTHING to do with the rise of Hitler. If US is guilty of anything in regard to Jews, it’s in having aided Zionists in the destruction of Palestinians, but there is hardly any discussion of Nakba in American Politics. If Jews make white Americans feel guilty about the Shoah(done by Germans on the other side of the Atlantic), Hindus now argue that White America, Canada, and Australia must atone and pay for what the Brits did in India. Even if America, Canada, and Australia were founded and/or developed by Anglos, what do British actions in India have to do with non-Indian lands? For example, if Anglo-Canadians are ‘guilty’ of anything, it would be their taking of lands from the indigenous folks. Same goes for the US. And in Australia, the Anglos took the land from the so-called Aborigines. So, even if we were to accept the White Guilt Narrative, whites wronged different peoples in different parts of the world. While Hindus made good sense to argue that Anglos must leave India that should be ruled by Hindus themselves, they make NO SENSE when they argue that non-Indian lands must make way for massive Hindu immigration-invasion and dotkin colonization because of what the Brits did in India. It’s like Palestinians have good reason to demand the Right of Return, but imagine a bunch of Hindus arguing that Israel should let in tons of Hindus because of what had been done to the Palestinians. Hindus are trying to steal the Victim Pie of other peoples: "You guys suffered and are owed a debt, so WE collect it." In Canada, ‘victim pies’ should go to indigenous folks and in Australia to its aboriginal natives. After all, they are the ones who lost their lands to whites. But Hindus with their Dotzpah say they should have the main rights to the ‘victim pies’. Hindus are as unscrupulous as the Jews.
DOTKIN LOGIC: Because Anglos took the lands of American/Canadian Indians, Asian Indians should take over those lands via massive immigration-invasion. Why not argue Asian Indians should be given licenses to Casinos in Indian Reservations?
Hindus and Jews have some things in common. Both are peoples with ancient roots that go back thousands of years, something that can’t be said for most peoples around the world. Their longevity has to do with the fusion of ethnicity with spirituality, the most resilient formula for survival. In our time, both Jews and Hindus tend to be anti-Muslim though for different reasons. Jews have issues with Iranians and Palestinians, but as the Muslim world is so divided, Jews have forged defacto alliances with Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Unlike the Muslim world, the Hindu world is far less divided, but then, Hinduism is mostly restricted to India with only pockets of co-religious communities throughout Southeast Asia. In a way, Hindus aren’t so much anti-Muslim as anti-Pakistan and anti-treason among their own kind(as diehard Hindu nationalist believe that Asian-Indians who converted to Islam long ago betrayed their own race and culture). In other words, Hindus feel little or no animus against Iranian Muslims or Malaysian Muslims. Rather, Hindus are angry with former-Hindus who went over to Islam. It’s a matter of ‘narcissism of small differences’. It’s like Jews especially hate fellow Jews who convert to Christianity or Islam. Furthermore, in the West at least, the term ‘Hindu’ has a broader meaning as, despite religious differences, the habits and attitudes of many Muslims from the subcontinent are remarkably similar to that of their Hindu brethren. The majority of Pakistanis are ex-Hindu-Muslims whose ancestors converted centuries ago. Racially, they are indistinguishable from Hindus just like Catholic Europeans and Protestant Europeans most often cannot be told apart by their creeds. So, terms like ‘Hindu’, ‘dothead’, or preferably 'dotter' or ‘dotkin’ don’t necessarily mean someone of Hindu faith. Fareed Zakaria is a Muslim-born Asian-Indian but looks like any Hindu and could therefore be included in the Dotkin Category. Also, his way of thinking is remarkably similar to that of bonafide Hindus from India. It’s like Jews who gave up Judaism and became atheist communists still remained Jewishy in their personalities and attitudes.
Fareed Zakaria, an Indian Muslim but looks and thinks like Hindu Dotkins in the West.
When we speak of Hindus, we must be far more careful in drawing a distinction between Hindu elites and Hindu masses than when we speak of Jews. While plenty of Jewish masses may not see eye-to-eye with the Jewish elites, the fact is a sizable portion of the Jewish population is in elite fields. Over 50% of Jews make more than $100,000 a year, and by some estimates, 40% of the top 1% in the US is Jewish. So, there is a great parity in achievement and attitude among Jewish masses and Jewish elites. Also, most Jews in the West are Ashkenazi and closely related in blood. In a way, the Abrahamic race is like a Brahminic race unto themselves. If there are high Hindus, middle Hindus, low Hindus, and gutter Hindus, Jews prefer to see their entire race as members of the High Race of Abrahamic-Brahmins or Abrahmins.
In contrast, India is a much divided nation despite Hindu nationalism. In a way, it’s a far older version of what happened in Latin America. The ancient Aryan invasions into India were like the white Spanish-Portuguese invasion of the New World. If the Hispanic invaders promoted some degree of race-mixing — mostly white male and brown female — , the Indo-Aryan elites resisted or outright banned miscegenation, but over thousands of years there was considerable interbreeding that blurred the lines between the conquerors and the conquered, but then not to the extent that certain racial distinctions cannot be noticed to this day. (And in Latin America, despite the promotion of race-mixing, there is a rough parallel between racial and class hierarchies: Generally, higher the class, whiter the race.) In modern times as the result of Western Influence, Indian reformers have sought to do away with caste and meld all Indians in a melting pot, but the fact is, on the cultural and social level, differences remain. (If southern Italy and northern Italy still remain divided in many respects, one can appreciate the far bigger differences among the peoples of India.
Yet, precisely because India is so diverse and divided, it has paradoxically led to a kind of national unity. Divisions can lead to strife and crisis IF distinct populations exist in territories roughly claimed as their own. Consider the breakups of the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia. Some of it was peaceful, some of it violent, but in every case, there were peoples with a more-or-less clear sense of ‘who we are’ as opposed to ‘who they are’. But in India where racial distinctions, class distinctions, linguistic distinctions, and religious distinctions have been all-over-the-map(plus the fact that the Indian elites tend to be far more Western-educated-and-prone than other national elites, not least because Indian higher education is taught in English, a language that remains ill-known to the majority of Hindus), it’s been difficult for most groups to gain the critical mass necessary for a separatist movement. If there are 1000 people made up of 10 groups of 100 people each, each group of 100 might choose to go its own way. But suppose there are 1000 people where each group consists of only 5 people. As most groups lack critical mass for autonomy, they have no choice but to stay within the whole under a comprehensive rubric. In India, the common theme for the great majority has been Hindu identity, but this has been as problematic as effective. Unlike Islam where all Muslims are equally blessed by Allah, Hinduism has had a long history of picking and favoring winners over losers, and this aspect of Hinduism will not go away suddenly despite the best efforts of Hindu Reformers to turn the religion into a national identity. But on the other hand, Hinduism has been more effective than Islam as a national theme because Hinduism, like Judaism, is specific to a people whereas Islam, being a credo-religion, can be adopted and claimed by any people. While there are Hindus outside India, India is the undisputed homeland of the Hindus. In contrast, Pakistan can’t make the same claim for its brand of Islam. For one thing, there are more Muslims in India than in Pakistan despite India being a Hindu majority nation. Also, the egalitarian ethos of Islam led to much internecine warfare among Muslims because EACH Muslim group or nation feels it is as good or better than other Muslim nations. In contrast, the emphasis on hierarchy led to less intra-conflicts among Hindus. Granted, one thing that has held India together is a certain haziness as most dotkin minds are rife with superstitions. With minds overloaded with so many contradictions and confusions — Hinduism is far fuzzier than other religions about the boundary between reality and fantasy — , most Hindus in India have had a difficult time in establishing who and what they are. Indeed, this was one reason why the Brits, who had a very clear sense of their identity in the racial and cultural sense, were able to rule India for so long. A sharp needle will go right through a soft and fuzzy pincushion.
Indian identity is essentially that of conquerors being swallowed up by what they conquered. In a way, the Aryan Conquerors in India were like the Mongols who invaded China. But if Chinese regained control from the Mongols, many of whom were absorbed into China, the descendants of the Aryan Conquerors remained in power over the millennia even as their bloodlines became more mixed with the darker-skinned Dravidian folks. In this sense, India is most like Latin America where the white race, despite mixing with natives, is still in control and will likely remain so for centuries to come, especially as the brown indigenous folks seem to lack the fire of inspiration and independence. What Indo-Aryan elites have in common with Latino-Aryan elites is their need to keep the population together by scapegoating Evil Whitey. Even though both Indo-Aryan elites and Latino-Aryan elites practice various means, ranging from subtle to blatant, to keep their power and privilege over the darker-skinned masses, they also seek to obfuscate their own racial-conscious practices by directing the Ire of racial injustice against Northern European whites, especially the Anglos, who’ve fallen completely under the spell of White-Guilt-ism.
In a way, Hindus are an ideal people for collaborating with Jewish globalist-imperialists. While Hindus take pride in their independence struggle, they also have long record of having constructively collaborated with the British. In some ways, the British had more problems dealing with the Irish than with Hindus despite the fact that there are many more Hindus who were of a very different culture. And this side of Indian-ness never faded. Even after the British left, the elites continued to communicate in English. Even today, Indian higher education is mainly in English like in Singapore. The Indian nationalist elites didn’t so much do away with British Imperialism as take over the roles that the British had established for themselves. Thus, in a way, the Indian nationalists inherited the ways of the British Empire. Also, even though Indians were proud to have struggled for and won independence, they never forgot all the rewards that came with being part of the Anglo-Spheric Empire. And many in the Indian diaspora, when given the chance of moving to India or the UK(or one of the white commonwealth states), chose the latter. Even though their hearts were with India, their bodies felt more comfortable and cleaner in white lands despite an odd white lad calling them a ‘wog’ or ‘darky’. As UK decline in power relative to the US, it was only natural that many Hindus would plan to move to America. Or Canada or Australia with lots of land and opportunities. And this is why Jews came to appreciate Hindus as a most useful ally. Jews not only see Hindus as allies against Islam and China but against whites as well. Unlike blacks and like homos, Hindu elites tend to be high-achievers, and such talent is good to have on one’s side. Jews have also sought an alliance with the Chinese diaspora, and in some ways, Jews are closer to the Chinese at least in one regard: A good number of Jews have married Chinese women whereas Jewish-Hindu marriages tend to be relatively rare. And Jews have trained plenty of East Asian ‘yellow dogs’ in the way of PC to use them against whites. If there’s one difference between East Asians and Hindus, it’s in their respective personalities. Whereas East Asians tend to be earnest, Hindus tend to be calculating. East Asian earnestness may be due to genetics but also to the fact that East Asians come from more cohesive homogeneous nations. Thus, like Swedes, East Asians tend to be more trusting of one another and obedient to the prevailing dogma. They take it to heart with greater sincerity. In contrast, as Hindus come from a world of so many divisions and distrust, they think more strategically than ideologically. While many Hindus surely believe in what they say, they also regard ideas as tools to get the upper-hand. They haggle for ideas. British legal tradition also played a role in the development of the modern Hindu character. While the Brits were into Rule of Law, national unity, cultural discipline, and all that, their legalist culture made for a less ideological society. Mastery of law(and verbal skills and wit) trumped Dominance of Ideology or Religion. The lawyer than the philosopher became the central figure of Britain. If the philosopher seeks The Truth for All Time, the lawyer seeks the truths of the moment that may win him the case. The lawyer is far more malleable and fluid in his thinking that the philosopher, ideologue, or theocrat. Indeed, the guiding liberal-democratic ‘values’ of Britain were more the work of legal scholars and professionals than of Big Thinkers. As Hindu elites sent their children to study law in the UK, India became filled with lawyerly types who became more adept at arguing points and making cases than seeking deeper truth and meaning. Needless to say, Jews also became masters of the law. Granted, both Jews and Hindus have a long tradition of law in their religions and customs, but both took a lot from Anglo/American law and gave it a tribal twist.
Because Anglos and Anglo-Americans continued to de-culturalize themselves and define themselves more by ideals, values, and process than rites, rituals, and customs — even British rituals of tradition became ‘clean’ and ‘dignified’ over time — , their Rule of Law made them favor legality over identity. In contrast, because Jews and Hindus maintained their cultural distinctness, their use of English and American laws became increasingly slanted toward tribal interests. Between legality and identity, the latter will win out IF it is strong. But identity will lose out to legality IF it is weak. Sadly, Anglo/American/Canadian identity grew overly generic, bland, idealistic, and individualistic, and that meant Anglo-folks of UK, US, and Canada were increasingly willing to bend over backwards to favor the law in fairness to ALL(regardless of race, creed, or color) than to preserve their own kind. In contrast, precisely because Jewishness and Hinduishness remained particularist and distinct, Jews and Hindus increasingly used legality to serve their own identities... even while spouting the Anglo/American ideals of Rule of Law and fairness to all. Just ask the Palestinians. And consider the Hindu Justice logic that says the US must let in millions of Hindus because of what was done to American Indians and blacks. Huh? America owes something to Hindus because of what happened to Negroes and the Red Man?
Anyway, why wouldn’t Hindus not collaborate with Jewish globalist supremacists? After all, they can have the best of both worlds. When Hindus collaborated with the Anglo-Imperialists, there was much to gain but also much to lose. Anglos brought modernity and progress to India and opened the door for the Indian diaspora all around the world as the British Empire at its height ruled over 1/4 of the world. Still, Indians were under a foreign power and treated as a subject people. And it was shameful that such a rich civilization with so many people and so much land would be pushed around by a bunch of people from a small island who, not so long go, had been barbarians far behind the Hindus in civilization and achievement. Thus, Hindu collaboration in the Age of British Empire was profitable but shameful. Hindus had to give something to gain something. It was collaboration where Hindus were clearly subservient to the British.
But, the new collaboration with the Jews is different. While Hindus do play a subservient role in relation to Jews in the West, the fact remains they have an independent and autonomous nation of their own. Their new collaboration doesn’t come at the price of loss of Indian Independence. Rather, they can have nationalism in India and gain much by working with Jews to control Whitey in the West. And maybe just maybe, Hindus may even take power from the Jews one day. While Jews have higher IQ than the Hindus — the general IQ of India is on the low side — , India has a lot of people and among them are a good number of geniuses and brilliant individuals. Also, whereas too many high IQ Jews are mixing with non-Jews or not breeding, the great majority of Hindus in the West are sticking with their own kind. Also, the culture of family tends to be stronger among Hindus than among Jews. While Jewish brains must rely on goy bodies, Hindu brains have plenty of Hindu bodies to work with. In the long run, global power could come down to a conflict between Jews and Hindus. They are allied now because they have common enemies/rivals/problems with Muslims, Chinese, or whites, BUT because so many high-end Hindus hanker for the jobs and wealth that Jews currently dominate, Jews could come in for stiff competition from Hindus in the future. Though I would bet against it, the Planet of the Apu isn’t inconceivable IF current Indian population-and-migration trends hold up, especially as white and East Asian demographics continue to implode. (Also, even as Hindus and Muslims/Pakistanis feel much bitterness toward one another in the subcontinent, they more-often-than-not see eye to eye when they come to the West. Indo-Muslims in the West are more likely to feel closer to Indo-Hindus than with Muslims of other nationalities.) It will largely hinge on the attitudes of white folks. White people have decided Jews are ‘one of us’. Even White Advocate Jared Taylor has wet-dreams of the Jewish-White Alliance. Almost all white folks worship Jews as the Holy Holocaust people. And so many whites have taken Jews to heart as funny comedians, hip celebrities, brilliant authors, great scientists, and etc. It helps that most Jews are at least 50% white and look it, and plenty of Jews could blend in easily with whites, especially those of/from Southern Europe. In contrast, Hindus will always seem like the Other to whites. Though Hindus were categorized as members of the Caucasian race, there are many kinds of Hindus. Some look almost Greek-Persian while others look almost like Australian Aborigines. Your average Hindu is dark-skinned with facial features that are distinct from those of Europeans(and even Arabs). So, even as whites may find some Hindus endearing, they will never see the dotkins as ‘one of us’. Even among white Libs who make a conscious effort to go beyond race, there is a closer connection to Jews than to Hindus. Among white Christians, the Judeo-Christian connection makes them feel closer to Jews than to Hindus with their alien religion with elephant gods and other forms of idolatry.
Hindus know this, and it fills them with resentment. This is why Hindus are now so eager to play up White Guilt in regard to their own kind. If whites won’t see Hindus as ‘one of us’ and give them a pass like with the Jews, Hindus must seek to control white emotions by manipulating White Guilt. As it stands, Jews have both the White Pass card and White Guilt card. Jews are accepted as white by whites, and they can flash the White Guilt card to browbeat whites into obeisance and cuckery. Even though Hindus have done very well in the US, they lack the White Pass and haven’t yet found a way to milk White Guilt in regards to Hindus(though they’ve had a bit more success in the UK and Canada that were part of the empire that subjugated India). In a way, it’s frustrating for Hindus as to how whiteness can be both a blessing and a curse. PC tells us that Evil Whitey is to blame for everything whereas non-whites are nobler. And yet, the West is still dominated by whites as the main support body. Even now, white votes and white spending power are most crucial in US, UK, Canada, and Australia. As it stands, even whites instilled with PC ‘wokeness’ prefer whites to most non-whites. Despite their constant yammering about Diversity, most white progs hang with other whites and have little interest in other cultures. This is why whites feel so close to Jews. In a way, the dogma of anti-whiteness makes whites draw closer to Jews as the Only Good Whites. If whites suck but if Jews-as-whites are so holy, it means whites must root for Jews as the Only Good Whites, the worthy standard-bearers of whiteness. Same goes for white delirium for Homomania. If whites suck but if white homos are so holy, it means one of the few ways whites can celebrate whiteness is by cheering on the homos, among whom whites and Jews are most prominent. Currently, whites have special feelings for Jews, homos, and Negroes, or the Holy Three but have no such feelings for Hindus. If Hindus were content to find success as immigrant-individuals in the US, this would be no problem, but of late, the Hindus can smell the blood. They sense what is happening: Jews broke the back of white pride, whites have lost confidence and autonomous warrior spirit — white fighting spirit as it remains is that of dogs serving the interests of Jewish Masters — , and white lands and legacy will soon be up for grabs in US, EU, Canada, and Australia. In this mad scramble for the white world, especially the Anglosphere, the Hindus want their share. To get a bigger share, Hindus want to be more aggressive to take more, but aggression needs to be morally shielded/licensed because even a wounded/dying beast will react in panic to overt aggression. Indeed, this is the secret that Jews and Negroes have. They aggressively and obnoxiously take and take from whites, but whites are helpless to do anything about it because Jews and Negroes, as Holy Peoples, have a moral shield around them. In contrast, overt Hindu aggression can lead to hostile reaction from whites. Whites don’t yield as readily to Hindu demands, and this is why Hindus emulate Jews in trying to forge a moral shield for themselves based on British Imperialist ‘exploitation’ of the subcontinent. But another problem for Hindus is that they are targeting the sectors that White Jews dominate. As Hindus lack a moral shield, their excessive ambition is met with push-back. For instance, in the aftermath of the 2008 Wall Street Meltdown, hardly any Jew faced justice even though Jews pretty much dominate Wall Street. In contrast, some low-down corrupt Hindus were targeted and penalized. The fact is the current system is set up so that Jews can get away with just about anything UNLESS they really mess up big time like Bernie Madoff did. In contrast, Hindus can be targeted for much less. Because Hindus know that Jews are a ‘made people’, the god-race of the West, they know they can’t overtly name and target the Jew as the rival. Hindus know that the ONLY American group that can be scapegoated for all problems is white people, especially if they happen to be male, straight, and conservative. So, even though much of the tensions are between Hindus and Jews, Hindus go along with the charade that they are being held back by WHITE people.
What Hindus and Jews have in common is the strategic insistence that whites were entirely wrong while they were entirely right. For Jews, the relationship between the Tribe and whites was always about noble and innocent Jews being wronged by wicked whites foaming at the mouth with ‘antisemitism’. Hindus obviously noticed that Jews(and blacks) gained tremendous power and/or prestige by ‘sacralizing’ themselves while vilifying the Other(whites). As serious students of power, Hindus have decided on the same ploy where White-Indian relations was always about Evil Whitey and Good Dotkin.
That said, because Jews are so powerful and because white power is far from over, Hindus figure that the proper thing is to side with Jews against whites for the time being. Hindus can read the writing on the wall. While white goyim outnumber Jews by a huge margin, the fact remains that Jews control the elite institutions and have the moral-spiritual upperhand over whites. If whites were to shake free of Jewish controls, gain white national liberation, and work together, they could beat the Jews, and then Hindus would most likely side with whites. But as things stand, Hindus sense that Jews got the upperhand while whites are fading dramatically on the world stage. As Jews control the West and seek goy collaborators with Jewish globo-homo supremacy, Hindus are eager to play along... for the time being. Look at Sundar Pichai. That dotkin played along with Jews and got rewarded with CEO position at Google. He does the bidding for his Jewish Masters to rig and manipulate Google to favor Jewish and Zionist interests over those of Palestinians and whites. As things stand, Jews lead, and Hindus follow. Jews came up with Globo-Homomania, and Hindus(and everyone else) just tag along like dogs. But if East Asians and whites of Northern European extraction are earnest in their commitment to the ‘Poz’, not all Hindus are so lame and stupid. They KNOW what is really happening and play along until the game changes.
Jews and Hindus both come from haggly-waggly cultures. Jews became this way because they had to make it in the most advanced part of the world, the Christian West. Chinese became market-dominant in Southeast Asia but didn’t need to be so haggly-waggly because they were up against lackluster third-rate SE Asians. In contrast, Jews had to struggle among smart, tough, and independent whites. Jews needed to be extra-pushy to get things their way. And Hindus needed to be haggly-waggly because the sheer caste, cultural, and linguistic diversity in India didn’t make for a culture of community and shared values. Furthermore, as strict and exclusive as Hinduism was in determining who could be a Hindu, it could be accepting and adaptive with foreign ideas. Non-Hindu gods, cultures, and ideas could be appropriated into Hinduism. Also, the pluralistic localism of Hinduism meant that different towns and villages could have their own extra-gods and spiritual fetishes. It’s like there’s one Hindu sect that reveres rats of all things. Obviously, most Hindu sects feel no such reverence toward pesty rodents, but the thing about Hinduism is the lack of strict central authority, thereby permitting different Hindu individuals, sects, and locales to seek their own path of enlightenment. This has made Hinduism both complex and fascinating but also exasperating and ludicrous. And yet, such adaptiveness may be an advantage for Hindus in crazy globo-homo world where, all of a sudden, countless people have come to worship sodomy as god or ‘godomy’. It'd Bolly-Holly-wood.
How the future will play out with the Hindu-Jew or HinJew Cooperation(with Jews as leader and Hindus as follower) is anyone’s guess. But for the time being, they are rather united because both are eager to grab as much from the beached white whale. They are eager to suck as much milk as possible from the white teat. Also, as Jews are tough, competitive, & rude and Hindus are mean, nasty, & dogged, they are stressed out from dealing with their own kind. As much as Jews stick with Jews and Hindus stick with Hindus, Jews know other Jews are a**holes and Hindus know other Hindus are a**wipes. They know that white people are much nicer, kinder, and fairer. And for the time being, white people still have much of the Magic Dirt, Magic Money, and Magic Goodness. Also, nothing unites Jews with other Jews like the bloodlust of leeching off whitey. And nothing unites Hindus with other Hindus like the bloodlust of sucking on whitey. It’s like wolves are united in their shared instinct to bring down a caribou or moose for food. And nothing unites Hindus and Jews(and other non-white groups) like the bloodlust of taking from whitey. In THE OLD MAN AND THE SEA, sharks and fishes of all kinds come together in feeding frenzy upon the marlin. It’s the way of the world.
There was a time when Jews were associated with defense of unfettered free speech. Many Americans were fooled that those Jews stood on principle. As it turned out, Jews defended Free Speech from the onset of the Cold War to around the mid-80s(when they realized they had near-total lock on higher institutions) because so many Jews were communists and radicals whose values and agendas were at odds with mainstream society. Also, Jews were seeking to legalize porn to (1) rake in huge profits from goyim (2) commoditize white women into marketable meat and (3) undermine manners and norms that strengthened the moral fiber of goy communities. Jews pushed pornography just like the Sackler Dynasty peddled opioids and other dangerous drugs. Back then, as Jews lacked total control of the institutions — and because considerable authority & influence still remained with the Catholic Church, religious organizations, patriotic/conservative groups, and family-centered America — , they felt they had no choice but to push for Total Freedom of Speech. Under the guise of Free Speech as a Constitutional principle, Jews could push radical agendas and seek to legalize pornography(and also break down the barriers between pornography and mainstream culture). Jews even had some of their own infiltrate or organize Neo-Nazi groups and stir up lots of noise. Then, the ACLU, to burnish its credentials as a champion of freedom, would do some token defending of these far-right groups. It created the impression that Jews are so idealistic that they will even go so far as to defend their arch-enemies, the Nazis. In the video below, we see the last time the ACLU stood for unfettered free speech for all. It is now totally with the PC witch-hunters.
The truth has been out of the bag for some time, especially with the rise of PC. Jewish passion for Free Speech was all just a ruse. The reason why Jews once feigned concern for Free Speech was to push their radical, tribal, and pornographic agendas. But once they gained dominant power, they had NO INTENTION of defending free speech for all. (Incidentally, a crucial reason why the period from the late 60s to the mid 80s was the Golden Era of Free Speech was because everything was in a state of flux or limbo. Neither Conservatives nor Liberals had total lock on morality, values, institutions, and message. The 60s and even the 70s were a time of both Abbie Hoffman and John Wayne. Traditional forces were waning but not yet finished, and Jews were on the rise but not yet totally dominant. And the Boomer generation, that staked itself on rebellion against the Man, wanted to believe itself to be agents for greater freedom. And yet, its self-image as the progressive & radical generation increasingly led it toward Political Correctness. In ALL IN THE FAMILY, both Archie and Meathead are for and against Free Speech in their own way. Archie is more open to crude speech about different racial, national, and religious groups, but he will defend suppression of anti-American radical speech. Meathead is, at least in principle, for Free Speech, but his holier-than-thou attitude presages the rise of Political Correctness. If he had to choose between right to free speech and righteous outrage, we know he’ll opt for the latter.)
Anyway, here we are in the 21st century, and Jews have total lock on just about all institutions and industries that matter. They control elite academia(that sets the template for rest of schooling, from state colleges to kindergarten). They control big media(which are essentially propaganda wing of the Deep State that is also controlled by Jews). They control top law firms and courts that decide who will be prosecuted and who will be let off easy. (Ever notice how the Power treats Antifa and Proud Boys differently? If Antifa attacks and the Proud Boys fight back, the latter is prosecuted. It's like how Israeli Justice System favors Zionist invaders in West Bank over displaced and brutalized Palestinians. Jews see whites as White Palestinians.) Jews control Wall Street and play caesar on who gets financing and who doesn’t. Jews control all the big social platforms either by direct ownership or through their proxy organizations such as SPLC and ADL that get to monitor who gets to remain on Twitter or who gets to sell books on Amazon. And there is an annual Nuremberg Rally in the US called the AIPAC Conference where goy-whore-politicians gather to pledge everlasting loyalty to Israel as the 10,000 yr Reich of the Jews.
Now, one might think that Jews would be more easy-going with their immense power. After all, if Jews were for Free Speech when they had considerably less power in the 50s and 60s, wouldn't they be for more free speech now since they are safe and secure as the dominant elites with so much money and power? Evidently not. If anything, becoming the New Ruling Elites of the US(and by extension the World) has paradoxically made Jews even more paranoid and hysterical. Jews are now spoiled and intoxicated with power. They no longer worry about discrimination or pogroms, let alone survival. They no longer worry about country clubs and whom they can marry. They are now addicted to supremacist power and adulation by goyim. They demand to be worshiped as demigods. It must be filet mignon and champagne at every meal. Anything less is an insult to their ego and pride. Today, 'antisemitism' means denying Jews their supremacist privilege as an eternal right.
Then, it's hardly surprising that Jews seem more nervous, anxious, and deranged than ever. They must have everything.
That said, in a way, Jews are being smart. After all, Anglo-American elites(aka Wasps) who were once the ruling elites rested on their laurels, felt secure in their power, and got to behaving magnanimously. Well, what became of them? They were ruthlessly deposed, decapitated, and castrated by resentful Jewish upstarts, much like how the trusting Trojans were destroyed by the Greeks who emerged out of the Wooden Horse. So, the ruling class must never take its power for granted, especially in a diverse nation with many contending tribes. Granted, only Jews could have pulled it off because they had the combination of high IQ, strong personality, intense tribalism, resentment & vengefulness(toward Christian Society), and the clever ploy of ‘Holocaust Guilt’ to use as moral shield against criticism of Jewish Power. Jews make a big deal about how the US went from ‘white supremacism’ to a land of ‘diversity and equality’, but in the upper echelons of power the US had only two elites: the Wasps and Bugs(Busy-Urban-Globalist-Semites). At the top, the power went from Anglo-Germanic elites(and Waspized Catholic Irish) to Jewish elites, and most of Diversity has merely been a political weapon used by Jews against White Power. Jews are UNWILLING to share power with Diversity. Diversity is merely their cudgel or attack dog. Just look how Jews responded to Ilhan Omar and non-white critics of Israel who support the BDS Movement.
Because Jews are so powerful, they fear becoming the focus of goy ire because, after all, it is natural for the masses to blame the ruling class for most of the macro-problems. (When Wasps were at the top, Jews surely allied with various groups, including with white ethnics and Catholics, to blame and excoriate the Anglo-American elites for EVERYTHING.)
Jewish elites especially feel nervous and paranoid because Jews don’t have the numbers. Jews are merely 2% of the US population. At the very least, Anglo-Germanic-Celtic-American elites had vast support among white gentiles. (And even non-Anglo-Germanic-Celtic white Americans became effectively Anglo-Americanized in due time. Polish-Americans and others joined with White Christian/Gentile America.) In contrast, Jewish elites feel like the British overlords in Asia, Africa, and the Near East. They have the ruling power but not the numbers to back them up. When nationalist passions began to stir in British colonies, the British ruling class was effectively doomed, the most famous case being India’s independence from the Empire in 1948. Soon thereafter, the natives in other British colonies also clamored for independence and liberation, and the British were expelled from most of their colonies(like Jews had been expelled from so many nations, though, granted, the British weren’t as hated by the locals as the Jews were through the ages. Indeed, once British imperialism ended, the locals were happy to have British return as tourists and businessmen. And many longed to move to Great Britain.) The rise of Jewish power has been spectacular, but the fall could be likewise, and that is what Jews fear. It is because Jews lack the numbers. If many people come to realize Jewish elites rule America and, furthermore, tend to be exploitative, parasitic, venal, and mendacious than decent, kind, generous, and magnanimous, the tide could turn. White Americans who’ve come to regard Jews as wise and tragic Holy Holocaust people can come to see them as a bunch of a**holes. This is why Jews seek to increase Goy Diversity so as to play various groups against one another. The great irony is that, even though Jews use Diversity against whites, whites are still the most pro-Jewish group in the US while many members of Diversity aren’t so keen on Jews or even hate them. Also, because many non-whites are recent arrivals, they’ve been less acculturated to the American neo-religion of Jew-Worship. Furthermore, non-whites are encouraged by Jewish elites to hate white people as ‘racist oppressors’, but non-whites often can’t distinguish between whites and Jews. In many cases, they notice that Jews are the richest and most powerful whites, not least because Jews seem to have so many whites & Christians singing endless hosannas to Israel. Also, even as Jews dump on Donald Trump, he seems to love Jews more than any other people and seems so chummy with Bibi Netanyahu of ‘far-right’ Israel. Jews tell Diversity to hate the GOP, but the GOP says it loves Jews and Israel more than the Democrats do. If GOP is the party of ‘racist whites’, and if those evil whites love Israel so much(more than even America), where do Jews fit into all this?
Anyway, Jews now have near-total power, and that is why they fear Free Speech. Free Speech means the freedom of the powerless to have their say, and it has been greatly amplified by the power of the internet, especially the rise of social media and video platforms. So, even though Jews still have control of dominant institutions, their agenda can be upended by certain individuals. Take someone like Pewdiepie who started out as a nothing, a nobody. Prior to the internet age, he would have been some eccentric kid on the block. But he began to develop a massive following, and his videos are now seen by tens of millions of people.
Mark Dice, Paul Joseph Watson, Sargon of Akkad, Styxhexenhammer666, Ramzpaul, Black Pigeon Speaks, Jared Taylor, Roosh, Stefan Molyneux, J.F. Gariepy, Ryan Dawson, Vincent James, Nick Fuentes, Steve Turley, and etc. are individuals without institutional power, but their messages sometimes reach a larger audience than well-funded enterprises and organizations do. So, someone with a compelling message and a webcam can be more effective as a conveyer of ideas and messages than well-paid talking heads of MSM who, in order to keep their paychecks, must toe the Party Line. Because individuals are not doing it for money(or for far less than MSM talking heads are), they are freer to say what’s on their minds. They cannot get fired.
And this is why Jewish Power has decided to DEPLATFORM such individuals by using the most Kafkaesque means. When Franz Kafka wrote THE TRIAL and THE CASTLE, he surely didn’t mean them to be used as manuals of power(or maybe his Jewish subconscious did), but that’s what they became in the hands of Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, and etc. These oligarchies always begin by claiming to ban ‘extremist hate speech’ such as praise for Hitler and denial of Shoah, but then the rules get murkier and murkier to the point where even Faith Goldy is de-personed because she thinks mass-immigration-invasion will destroy the Canada that she loves. In many cases, the oligarchies give no clear reason as to WHY someone was denied service or offer the most ludicrous highfalutin explanation, like when Sargon was kicked off Patreon.
Some say the current censorship is ‘anti-conservative’, and even though it’s true that those on the ‘right’ suffer more, it also depends on ethno-centrism. After all, BDS is usually associated with the Left, but it’s been hammered by Jewish power, while Israel, ruled by a ‘far-right’ regime, is favored by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and etc. It doesn’t matter what kinds of international crimes Israel commits against Palestinians or neighbors. The fact is the so-called ‘leftist’ big-shots at Google, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, and etc. gladly work closely with ‘right-wing’ Israel. Why? Because it’s Jews working with Jews. Unlike stupid whites who put ideology before identity, Jews are smart enough to know that identity is more important than ideology in the game of power. Rachel Maddow is said to be a ‘progressive’, but she is a warmongering bitch who serves the Deep State that is in bed with ‘far-right’ Israel. Meanwhile, she denounces left-wing Venezuela. Among Jews, ‘left’ vs ‘right’ is merely a diversion. What matters most to Jews is ‘us’ vs ‘them’. This is why, if Jews use Diversity against whites to advantage Jewish power, whites must grow a pair and use Diversity against Jews in kind. Fight fire with fire. But sadly, even as Jews tell the Diversity Dog to bite whitey, the whitey tries to defend Jews from the Diversity Dog(ordered by Jews to bite whitey). The current White Strategy is the most retarded in human history. Imagine someone beating you with a cudgel and you try to defend him from the very cudgel that he is using to clobber you with. Whites are into the ‘cuckgel’. It’s no wonder Jews feel such contempt for white goy cucks.
In essence, Jews now fear Free Speech because it speaks truth to Jewish Power, which happens to be in supremacist, hegemonist, and even genocidal mode: Wars for Israel and White Nakba(or reduction of whites into reviled & dehumanized minorities in nations of their origins or founding). But because few people will support suppression of Free Speech as criticism of the Powers-that-be, Jews have associated Free Speech with ‘hate’, ‘extremism’, ‘Holocaust Denial’, and ‘white supremacism’. Now, of course, there are those who misuse Free Speech to spew nonsensical bigotry, demented ideas, and crazy notions(like some of the more outlandish theories about 9/11 and the Moon landing). And some like Alex Jones made their reputations through sensationalism.
But, denunciation of hatred, contempt, and extremism is rich coming from Jews who control the music industry and fill the airwaves & TV screens with ugly rap, demeaning lyrics, and skanky idolatry. It’s rich coming from Jews who control Hollywood and made so many movies about subhuman ‘rednecks’ and psychotic Muslims(nearly all of whom are terrorists). It’s rich coming from Jews who control MSM and have promoted endless hate propaganda against Russians, Iranians, Syrians, Palestinians, Venezuelans, Chinese, and etc. According to some Neocon Zionists, the US should brace for World War III, IV, V, and etc. because it’s the destiny of the ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ America to remain the lone superpower forever(esp in service to its Jewish Overlords). A Jewess like Madeleine Albright can say it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children and still be honored by the Establishment. (But if US were to place sanctions on Israel for its illegal Occupation of West Bank and if only 100 Jewish kids died as a result, there would be outrage about Another Holocaust.)
Jewish Power uses extortion rackets like SPLC and ADL(in collusion with the Jew-run Media and platforms) to create the impression that Evil People are using Free Speech to spread ‘hate’, ‘extremism’, and etc. By emphasizing the antics of a handful of self-professed Neo-Nazis and KKK, the Jew-run media create the impression that the US is on the precipice of a ‘fascist’ takeover led by ‘white supremacist’ Donald Trump(while overlooking the fact that, if Trump has been supremacist on anything, it’s been for Zionism Uber Alles and ‘Muh Holocaust’). The very Jews who spread the rancid paranoid hysteria over Russia Collusion and, before that, the lies about WMD(to ignite the Iraq War) are lecturing to us about hatred. And notice that the term ‘White Supremacism’ doesn’t apply only to Neo-Nazis or some such ilk. Jews say that, due to the history of White Supremacism, any sign of white identity, interests, or sovereignty is ‘white supremacist’. Never mind that European Imperialism was often financed by Jewish bankers such as the Rothchilds. If white imperialism was supremacist, then Jewish role in it was also supremacist. Also, Jews played a huge role in the slave trade in the New World. And Jews were the main sellers of opium to the Chinese. And Jews funded the arms industry that led to various wars killing millions. And of course, Jews also played a key role in communism that destroyed millions of more lives.
Now, it’s true that many European Jews got burned in World War II, but then, people who play with fire can get seriously hurt. Why did so many innocent Germans, Russians, and Japanese also perish in the war? Because their elites all played with fire. Though Adolf Hitler was the main driver of events, would the National Socialists have come to power if Jews hadn't played a key role in communism(and its killing of millions before WWII) and Weimar degeneracy & depression that alienated and angered so many Germans? So, Jews weren’t merely innocent victims of World War II. Sure, many innocent Jewish civilians were killed by Hitler’s madness, but the Germans were driven to follow a mad man because their nation was, to a large extent, wrecked by a mad people, the Jews. Jewish behavior in Russia of the 90s offers a clue as to how Jews operate in times of crisis. Instead of trying to fix the problem and set things right, their main focus is to grab as much loot for themselves. While it’s true that many innocent Germans and Japanese(women and children especially) perished in World War II, it’s a fact that their leadership led them down a dangerous path. It’s a sad fact of history that when the elites go bad, the people suffer, indeed often more than the elites do. While some German and Japanese elites were hanged after trial, the far bigger victims were German and Japanese civilians who were firebombed and burned alive. And in Middle East Wars, the rotten US elites haven’t suffered one bit while tens of thousands of American soldiers(mostly white men) have been either killed or crippled for life(with many choosing to take their own lives). Likewise, many innocent and decent Jews perished in World War II because too many Jewish elites were the scum of the earth. Now, are the people entirely innocent? After all, the German and Japanese people supported their mad regimes. And too often, the Jewish masses stood by their elites. We see this everyday in the US and EU. Most Jews side with scum like George Soros. They cheer on Wars for Israel and call for White Replacement. They support ADL and SPLC that spew anti-white hatred. So, even ‘innocent’ Jews aren’t entirely innocent, just like all those Germans who either supported Hitler or failed to resist were partly culpable for what happened. And for that reason, the fate of Jews in World War II has to be seen within the larger context of grim history where, too often, the people perish along with the elites(or perish while the elites get off scot-free). After all, elites face the music ONLY IF they lose power. Josef Stalin also played a key role in the events that led to World War II. He allied with Hitler in the destruction of Poland and was willing to provide war material to Germany as long as the war was on the Western front. But as he was ultimately victorious, he never had to face justice, and it was the Soviet peoples who suffered mightily as the result of his playing with fire with political pyromaniac Hitler.
Whenever Jews kvetch about ‘white supremacism’, whites need to point to countless examples of Jews taking part in it, financing it, profiteering off it, and aiding & abetting it in myriad ways to squeeze out advantages for themselves. Take the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians. Massive Immigration-invasion by Europeans(and Jews) led to the destruction of native Indian communities & cultures across America. Jews totally took part in it. Jewish merchants sold guns to white cowboys to kill Indians with. And in the American South, Jews handled the money of the slave trade and slave plantations. And Jews disproportionately owned more slaves than whites did. Jews played an even bigger role in Brazilian slavery, the biggest slave enterprise in the New World. There was Jewish banking money behind British, French, and German imperialism. And Jews were the main sellers of opium to the Chinese. So, modern Jewish history is inseparable from ‘white supremacist’ history. Also, the main vehicle of ‘white supremacism’ was Western Imperialism(partially but substantially funded by Jews), and the biggest threat to ‘white supremacist’ imperialism was the rising nationalism of non-whites who resisted. Much of modern history can be understood in terms of supremacism-via-imperialism and sovereignty-via-nationalism. Now, have Jews been more for imperialism or nationalism? Jews have usually sided with the imperialists because their financial ambitions have been worldwide. In order to penetrate and profiteer from various markets, Jews needed to weaken the national sovereignty of peoples around the world and support imperialism as the means of hegemony. So, Jewish history has been very much linked with ‘white supremacy’.
Furthermore, Jewish immigration patterns have always followed in the footsteps of ‘white supremacists’. So, if whites conquered and gained mastery over non-white peoples, Jews followed along to profit off the opportunity created by ‘white supremacists’. Look at the Jewish monopoly of diamond mines and markets in South Africa. Indeed, where would Jewish Power be without the ‘white supremacist’ horse to ride on? If not for white imperialism and conquest of New World, Africa, Asia, and Middle East, Jews could not have made their vast fortunes. The Sassoon family that made a killing by selling opium to the Chinese rode on the horse of British ‘white supremacist’ imperialism. And how was the Zionist Project realized? Jewish bankers bribed British Imperialists to declare Palestine as a future Jewish state. And then, Jews pulled the strings in UK, Germany, USSR, and the US to get their way with Palestinians who were eventually expelled from their homeland in the tragic Nakba pogroms that were clearly Jewish-supremacist-and-imperialist. So, whenever Jews bitch about ‘white supremacism’, we need to tell them to shut the f*** up because Jews have been the biggest leeches of ‘white supremacism’.
But Jews, having no sense of honor or principles, try to have the cake and eat it too. Jews followed white conquests & discoveries(at the expense of non-whites) and took advantages of opportunities to enrich themselves(often far more than what whites got), but then, Jews also excoriated white people for their ‘historical sins’ of mistreating non-whites. Imagine that. Jews funded and followed white conquests and filled up their bellies and sacks, BUT they act like they are moral saints with some God-given right to pass judgement on others. The nerves. The chutzpah. Imagine you go hunting for a moose. And a Jew follows you and gives lend a hand at times. And when you bring down the moose, the Jew joins you in gorging on its meat. But then, the Jew wants all of the kill, and so, what does he do? He begins to berate you as a heartless hunter and ‘human supremacist’ killer of the poor noble moose. Therefore, you deserve NOTHING more of the moose, all of which is to be claimed by the Jew. Yes, that is how dirty and vile Jews play the game of history. Jews grab-and-take on the basis of bottomless greed but then pontificate from the highest perch. They act like Harvey Weinstein but sermonize like they’re Moses or something. They play prophets-for-profits.
What Jews fear most is not ‘white supremacism’ because, deep down inside, they know very well that most whites are not into supremacism or imperialism. Most whites believe the Age of Empire is long over, and their only wish is to have peace and prosperity in their own nations. When the French, British, Dutch, Spanish, and other empires fell, most Europeans went back home. And after the Cold War, the understanding was that Russians, Americans, and the rest of the world would mind their own business, and stability would prevail around the world. But then, guess which people hated the future vision of sovereign nations(except for Israel of course). Jews hated it because most nations are majority gentile. If every gentile nation was independent and sovereign, it’d be difficult for Jews to penetrate and take over. And so, Jews pushed the neo-imperialism of globalism that would kill two birds with one stone. Its agenda was to render the non-white world(and Russia) open to military invasion, financial takeover, and/or cultural imperialism of the US. In turn, all the West would be open to Third World mass-invasions. And of course, Jews would use homo-collaborators around the world to serve as agents. With control of the US, Jews would use American Power to pressure the rest of the world to put out to the cock of Uncle Samowicz. But lest White Americans grow discontent with playing toady-dogs to Jewish Power and say NO MORE to Jewish supremacism, Jews figured on increasing Goy Diversity so that diverse goyim will be at each other’s throats than uniting to take on Jewish supremacist power. Meanwhile, Jews could gradually recruit non-whites to fill white shoes.
But for the time being, Jews need white gentile collaboration with Jewish supremacist power because Jews cannot do all the grunt work to keep the empire going. Just like the British Imperialists in India needed local elite collaborators to run much of the system, Jews in the West rely mainly on white goy managers, supervisors, engineers, commanders, and etc. to carry much of the weight. And the only way Jews can ensure White Obeisance to Jewish Supremacism is by brainwashing whites into believing that white identity, white pride, white heritage, white consciousness, white interests, and etc. are all synonymous with ‘white supremacism’. So, even "It’s Okay to be White" = Evil White Supremacy. But in fact, Jews are really defending their own supremacism by keeping whites in submissive mode. When Jews holler, ‘white supremacism’, it’s really akin to a Southern Slave-owner denouncing a black slave who wants to be free as an ‘uppity crazy nigger’. How dare a ‘nigger’ want to be free when it’s his role in life to keep his head bowed low and serve his master, without whom he is nothing? Likewise, Jews feel, "How dare white gentiles seek emancipation, independence, autonomy, and separation from us Jews? Don’t those subhuman goy lowlifes know that they exist to SERVE us, OBEY us, KILL for us, DIE for us, SING for us, and GROVEL before us?" The fact that Facebook Jews decided to ban ‘white nationalism’ and ‘white separatism’ as synonymous with ‘white supremacism’ makes it plain as day what is really happening. The Jewish moral argument is total BS. White Nationalists, White Separatists, White Identitarians, and etc. are not, for the most part, associated with white supremacism of the Neo-Nazi or KKK school. Rather, they just want to live in a world of their own and leave other peoples alone.
So, what is the problem then? The problem is such people will not support the Jewish supremacist-imperialist Wars for Israel. They won’t support the ‘new cold war’ with Russia. They will not necessarily favor Zionists over Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians. And being conscious of their white identity, they will be sufficiently proud and independent to refuse to bow down before Jews like pathetic dogs and playing fetch. And as they want a world of their own, they will say NO to mass-immigration-invasion. But if Diversity agenda is stopped cold, it’ll be more difficult for Jews to play divide-and-rule among goyim to maintain their supremacist power over a fragmented populace. So, the Jewish War on Free Speech is not about combating White Supremacism. That's just a cover, a ruse. It’s really about safeguarding the currently dominant Jewish Supremacism by shutting down True Speech of those who dare to speak truth to Power, one that is now overwhelmingly Jewish and Globalist. Jews use their vast networks to create the illusion that most of Free Speech among ‘white nationalists’ is about praising Hitler and Holocaust, but this BS is Hollywood reality. In truth, what Jews are freaking out about is that the so-called ‘white nationalism’ is really about White National Liberation from Jewish supremacist globo-homo imperialism. It’s about the possibility of mass white-desertion from Jewish globalist hegemony that has spread homo-tranny degeneracy, Afro-thuggery, interracist pornography, child-corrupting degeneracy, Wars for Israel & deaths of countless Arabs/Muslims, Hate Propaganda against Russia & Iran, and financial robbery by Wall Street. Just like commanders in war are nothing if the soldiers desert, Jewish supremacist power is nothing if goyim, especially whites, say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and refuse to serve as the pawns of venal Jews who look upon goyim as so much cannon fodder.
Indeed, isn’t it weird how Jews do so much to defame, degrade, and denounce whites but then demand that whites stick with Jews and do their bidding? If Jews hate white people so much, why did Jewish immigration always chase after whites? Why didn’t Jews leave Europe long ago? And why didn’t Jews emigrate to Africa, Asia, or any part of the world without whites? Even today, who is forcing Jews to live in white nations? If Jews love immigration and non-whites, they can have BOTH by moving from white lands to non-white ones. But these Jews who endlessly insult and berate whites as the worst scum of the earth are always calling on whites to support Jews and bail them out. Imagine someone who spits in your face and whips you night & day but then demands that you work for him and defend him. If he hates you so much, why does he so obsessively cling to you? Why doesn’t he go his own way so that you can go your own way? Of course, he uses threat and violence against you to keep you as his servant and dog. Just like a rider or stage-coach driver must constantly remind the horse or horses that they exist to serve humans, Jews must constantly use verbal whips and harness to keep whites in line. But then, it was the same with blacks in the South. It was precisely because southern plantations depended so much on slave labor that blacks had to be kept in line to obey, pick cotton, and carry bales on their backs. If blacks weren’t made to feel inferior to whites, they might say, "Why we be doing all this shit for dat honkey-ass mofo who done hire overseers to call us ‘nigger’?" Whites had to psychologically exploit black inferiority along with threats of physical punishment to keep blacks in line. The white narrative said, "Because of the history of black ugabuga jungle savagery, blacks must understand that they need to undergo the purgatory of slavery to be shaped into hard-working, law-abiding, and constructive individuals who may one day be worthy of civilization." Whites exploited the element of Black Shame to control blacks. Today, Jews are the massuhs of globalism, and they use ‘White Guilt’ to control whites. The Jewish Narrative says, "Because whites committed so many historical ‘sins’ with genocide and slavery and racism and etc., they must reject their white identity and work for the good of all humanity, namely by serving the agenda of Jewish supremacists." Jews tell whites to drop white identity for all-humanity but then demand that they serve Jews uber alles. Bait and Switch. Jews make whites surrender 'white supremacism' for equality, only to steer the deracinated whites into serving Jewish supremacism.
Notice how devious and clever these Jews are. Jews always talk of ‘white supremacism’ as something separate from Jewish history. Jews do this by invoking the Shoah as a case of Jewish victim-hood at the hands of white ‘racist anti-Semites’. Jews also remind the world of Jewish persecution at the hands of the White Christian West. Jews don’t mention that they played a huge role in white slave trade in the Middle Ages. Jews don’t mention that they collaborated with Moorish and Turkish invaders into Europe. Jews don’t mention that they worked for European noblemen to exploit the peasantry. Jews don’t mention the fact that they lent huge sums to European monarchs and government to wage wars and conquer entire parts of the world. Jewish money played a very significant role in European Imperialism. Jewish historiography is totally selective and dishonest and completely lacking in honor. Lacking a martial culture and having developed under a merchant culture, Jews are hagglers and hustlers than men who would put their lives and reputations on the line.
Anyway, what are the 10 Reasons why Jews HATE Free Speech? Let us count the ways.
1. Jews hate Free Speech because We might call for NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL. Notice how Jews hate Tulsi Gabbard who wants to end the crazy war in Syria. Free Speech allows us to decry how Jews have been using the US military as hammer of Jewish globalist hegemony. Jews make up less than 0.3% of US military but make up more than 50% of the decision makers. And even most non-Jewish politicians take their cues from Jewish donors. So, all these Wars in the Middle East have been Wars for Israel that Jews want but we don’t want. Free Speech means we can freely notice Jewish Power and call out on its abuses. We can say NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL and no more human sacrifice of goyim as cannon fodder to serve the tribalist supremacism of Jews.
2. Jews hate Free Speech because We might denounce Israel’s use of IDF death squads to mow down Palestinian women and children who want to return to their homeland, from which their ancestors were expelled in the Nakba Pogroms. The US is supposed to have a Free Media that conveys the truth, but we don’t hear much truth from the (((media))) on the matter of Palestinians. So, IDF death squads get to commit more acts of cold-blooded murder and get away with it.
3. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak the truth about the Jewish ethno-monopoly of the media. Most of the Mass Media is owned and/or controlled by Jews. Fox News is goy-owned, but many of its top executives are Jewish, and it’s been said it is even more pro-Zionist than Jewish-owned outlets. The idea of Free Media is just that: An idea than reality. How can we have a truly Free Media when most of MSM are controlled by a handful of oligarchs, almost all of them Jewish who hire and fire people depending on how obeisant they are to Israel, Jewish Power, globo-homo propaganda, and other agendas favored by Jewish supremacist elites.
4. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak the truth about black crime. Why do Jews cover up black crime and violence? It’s because Jews use ‘white guilt’ as a form of mind-control over whites. According to the Jew-run media, blacks are either awesomely cool or tragically noble(or both), and whites must atone for their grave sins against such a wonderful & superb race. ‘White guilt’ about blacks is effective ONLY IF whites continue to see blacks as super-cool and/or saintly. In fact, as Colin Flaherty has tirelessly documented, blacks are the most violent, thuggish, demented, aggressive, arrogant, and destructive people in the US. They commit the most crime, and most non-black races have most to fear from black criminals, thugs, or bullies. Black cool is a media illusion, and black nobility is a fraud. Sure, blacks were victimized in the past, and there is a very real tragic dimension to their history in America. But it’s also true that evolution made blacks tougher, more aggressive, and more pathological. As such, they are the main predators and lunatics in American streets and schools. Jews seek to suppress free speech and true speech about blacks because they want to keep the torch of ‘white guilt’ going.
5. Jews hate Free Speech because We might call for the commemoration of Nakba Pogroms of 1948 that ethno-expelled 700,000 Palestinians from their homeland. Last year, 2018, was the 70th anniversary of Nakba, but notice that the Jewish-dominated US media totally ignored it. And when IDF death squads mowed down Palestinians who marched to the border to seek re-entry into their lost homeland, not a single American politician spoke up for the dead women and children. This is why Jews hate Free Speech. With true Free Speech, we can call upon all the good people to remember and commemorate Nakba.
6. Jews hate Free Speech because We might challenge bogus historical narratives and say that Leo Frank was guilty of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan. Jewish Power has duped us with Fake History that has portrayed Leo Frank as an innocent Jew set upon by an ‘antisemitic’ lynch mob when it was the furthest thing from the truth. If anything was ‘antisemitic’(or antisemitism-confirming), it was the behavior of the Northern Jewish Community that pulled every dirty trick in the book to clear Leo Frank of a crime he most likely committed. Jews bitch about ‘antisemitic tropes’ nowadays, but if anything perpetuates ‘antisemitic stereotypes’, it is Jewish behavior that is so often without honor & principles and will resort to any means, no matter how foul and filthy, to get their way.
7. Jews hate Free Speech because We might speak about how Jews took advantage of post-communist Russia in the 1990s to economically loot the nation for the aggrandizement of limitless Jewish greed. Indeed, what Jews did to Russia of the 1990s gives us hints as to what Jews did to Germany in the Weimar Period. When Jews see a crisis, they see an opportunity. As Jews hold goyim in contempt, they don’t use the crisis for the good of all people but to fill their pockets and secure yet more advantages for themselves. They see yet another round of the Shylock Doctrine.
Because Jews own the Western Media, most people are still in the dark as to Jewish perfidy in Russia of the 90s and why Russians supported the semi-autocratic nationalist rule by Vladimir Putin who, by hook and by crook, wrested some of the power from the Jewish oligarchs who nearly came to own all of Russia and run it(mostly to the ground). Amy Chua discussed the problem in her book WORLD ON FIRE, but she’s been tamed since then into a hapless yellow dog who fetches for Jewish Power. https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2018/04/18/must-read-the-rape-of-russia-video/
8. Jews hate Free Speech because We might condemn Jewish organized crime and Israel as the biggest white slavers of the 21st century. Jewish gangsters have long been involved in prostitution and drugs, but Jews took this to new heights after the collapse of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. As Jews regarded these goy women as ‘shikses’(Yiddish for ‘filthy gentile whore scum animals’), the women were nothing but pieces of meat for the sex market. As there were so many poor and desperate women in Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Europe, Jews turned many of them into prostitutes. But even worse, many of these women were enticed to Israel for work whereupon they were forced in sexual slavery and beatings. Of course, Hollywood movies like TAKEN would have us believe that Muslims and Eastern European gentiles are behind abduction and slavery of white women, but the fact is Jews dominated the business. With Free Speech, we can speak this truth, and that’s why Jews hate Free Speech as the weapon of truth. Truth will undermine Jewish perfidy and rottenness.
9. Jews hate Free Speech because We might discuss the Jewish role in communism. While many Jewish communists were sincere and courageous in their commitment to change and progress, the radical socialist ideology as cure turned out to be worse than the disease. Also, too many Jewish Bolsheviks, flush with power and privilege, just couldn’t control their lust for ruthless violence and terror. Jewish communists especially targeted Russian Orthodox Christians and Ukrainian peasantry that had a tradition of defiance and independence. Jewish Bolsheviks played a key role in smashing 50,000 Churches in Russia and Ukraine. Also, they played a significant role in what is called the Holodomor in Ukraine where it’s been estimated that 3 to 4 million people perished due to man-made famines. While Jews were not the only people responsible for the excesses of communist horror, they played a very important part. But as Jewish control the Narrative via media and academia, we’ve been led to believe that Jews were the most tragic victims of Stalinism and Soviet tyranny, which is total baloney. While many Jews did face persecution under Stalinism and what came later, they were devoured by the very monster that they helped to create.
10. Jews hate Free Speech because We might discuss the Jewish role in the opioid crisis that, from 1997 to 2017, killed 400,000 people, the vast majority of them of the white working class. Lately, Jews in NY have been denouncing the Sacklers, but it’s like deja vu of faux Jewish outrage over Bernie Madoff. NY Jews are trying to signal that THEY had NOTHING to do with the loathsome Sacklers who, like the Jewish Sassoon Dynasty that monopolized the opium trade in China, knowingly peddled horribly addictive drugs to unsuspecting white Americans. NY Jews most likely knew all along what was going on. After all, NY is Wall Street, the financial capital of the world through which Jewish oligarchs have been raping and plundering the world. Much of the wealth in NY is ill-gotten. Consider how Wall Street made off like bandits during the housing bubble. When their dirty schemes crashed and they were faced with bankruptcy, they used their puppets in governments to bail them out, and then these Jews had another round of super-profiteering while rest of the nation was stuck in near-zero growth. Just like Madeline Albright said it was worth it to kill 500,000 Iraqi children for the sake of Israel, Sacklers obviously thought it was worth it to kill 400,000 goyim(and many more as they were in the business before 1999) to rake in more billions for the Jews. Jews covered up for Bernie Madoff when he was a cash cow for them and then dumped him only when he was no longer useful. And of course, the Jew-run media spun the narrative that Madoff stole mostly from Jews when, in fact, he mostly stole from goyim to enrich Jews. His Jewish clientele lost out only in the end.
There are many more reasons why Jews hate Free Speech, and we may cover them in the future. But the important thing is to remind ourselves that when Jews say they only want to remove ‘hate’ from Free Speech, DON’T YOU BELIEVE IT. If anything, Jews aren’t fearful of Neo-Nazi or KKK crazy speech because such gives the impression that there are indeed lots of extremist people out there just itching to start World War III and the Holocaust. Deep down inside, Jews know that Neo-Nazis and KKK hardly exist, and that is why Jews fund groups like SPLC to operate like Hollywood in conjuring scary stories about Nazi or KKK under every bed or around every corner. And of course, Jews push all these Hate Hoaxes that are meant to defame whites as vandals of Jewish graves and black churches when, if anything, the majority of the much publicized ‘hate crimes’ were actually carried out by blacks and Jews. https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/18/hoax-hate-crimes-list/ The real reason why Jews seek to suppress Free Speech is no different from why the Cuban or North Korean government does. People speaking freely is a challenge to the supremacist power of the ruling elites. Just like the leaders of Cuba and North Korea want to seem infallible, Jewish Power is no different. Indeed, Jews endlessly invoke the term ‘antisemitic’ to defame and discredit ANY criticism of Jewish Power. Jews respond to criticism like Big Brother. Just like Winston Smith must love Big Brother, we must love Big Jew. If we see evidence of dominant Jewish power, it may be ‘antisemitic’ on our part... that is unless, like Joe Biden, one says everything Jews do, such as pushing ‘gay marriage’ and white replacement, is ALL FOR THE GOOD. So, that’s your choice. You must pretend Jews aren’t particularly rich and powerful, OR if you do notice Jewish wealth and power, you must blather on and on about how power and wealth in the hands of Jews can ONLY DO GOOD and NEVER DO BAD. And of course, if Jews make a big mess of something, just find a ‘scapegoy’. Iraq War go badly? Never mind the Zionists who pulled the strings and orchestrated the event. Just blame goyim Bush the dummy and Dick Cheney the gangster.
Jewish Internet Monopolies do all they can to shut down Free Speech of Americans
