Relativity of Treason — How Donald Trump is both a Traitor and a Patriot

Following the summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the Jew-run Mass Media have gone bonkers in smearing Trump as some kind of unprecedented traitor. This was to be expected because the entire Russia-Collusion-Hysteria had been engineered from the get-go to prevent the meeting of Trump and Putin. But Trump being Trump, he decided to meet with Putin and discuss important matters as World Leaders. Trump knows(and we know and even enemies of Trump know deep in their hearts) that the Russian Collusion thing is the biggest hoax in US history. It was essentially concocted by Jews and MIC(military-industrial-complex) to prevent a rapprochement between the US and Russia. There are reasons why Jews and MIC want to antagonize Russia. For Jews, it’s ethnic hostility rooted in historical animus and tribal greed. As Jews control the media and Deep State, they control the Narrative and get to define ‘American Interests’ which essentially comes to "Is it good for Jewish supremacism?" and "All Americans must like whatever Jews like and hate whatever Jews hate." Jews get to decide our loves and hates, and that means we are to be denied Emotional Autonomy. We must be like dogs that take emotional cues from their master. As for the MIC, they need Russia as the Evil Enemy in order to justify their budget for warmongering. There are other anti-Russian elements too. Globo-Homo degenerates hate Russia because of its restoration of nationalism and traditionalism. Pathologically vain self-worshiping Homos and Trannies want all the world to honor, celebrate, and praise their fussy-fancy ilk. And power-porn elite-educated mafia just love the game of power, and they figure Russia is the most credible rival in the world, especially as Jews have given green light to hate and revile Russia. For them, what counts is the sheer nihilism of playing The Game.

Anyway, the question of Treason is never a simple one because the logic of Treason and Loyalty is always relative. Consider the film CHARIOTS OF FIRE. The Olympic runner must choose between God and King. In choosing God, he is seen by some as snubbing and disrespecting the king. But to the sprinter, it is a higher loyalty. Similar conflict unfolds in the film BECKET where Richard Burton as the eponymous character must choose between loyalty to his friend & king AND a higher sense of duty.


James Comey himself reiterated the problem of treason with his book HIGHER LOYALTY. Comey violated FBI rules and conspired against the President. As such, he is a traitor to the Bureau and to the President. But Comey insists he acted out of a higher loyalty. To what? Truth and justice? To globo-homo agenda? Or to the nihilism of Deep State wrapped in bogus moralizing? In the film THE WILD BUNCH, Pike Bishop(William Holden) defends his estranged ex-friend Deke Thorton(Robert Ryan). Though Thorton is on the hunt for his former outlaw partners, he’d given his word to the Law. Dutch Angstrom(Ernest Borgnine) counters Bishop’s defense of his old friend by insisting that the ‘word’ isn’t enough; it’s whom you give it to.

In RAN by Akira Kurosawa, there are multiple layers of meaning whereby apparent treason might be a deeper loyalty and seeming loyalty could be concealed treachery. The youngest son who’d spoken bluntly against his father was the loyal one. The older sons who spoke with devotion and respect were out for their own power and even willing to destroy their own father. The biggest traitor may be Lady Kaeda who conspires to have the (Hidetora) Ichimonji clan destroyed from within. But in another way, she is also the most loyal character as she’d remained true to her own clan that had been vanquished by the Ichimonjis. As the wife of lord of the Ichimonji clan, her machinations were clearly treasonous. But she’d never forgotten or forgiven the fact that the clan she’d married into destroyed her own family.

And in NIXON, Oliver Stone dramatizes how there are competing factions behind any politician, and each faction represents its own vision of what America should be. And as a politician relies on support from various factions with conflicting interests, his loyalty to one can easily appear as betrayals to others. Especially a nation as big and complex as the US cannot have a single easily definable formula of ‘America’ or ‘American Interests’. Usually, those at the Top(especially in media, academia, law, and politics) get to decide what America is all about. Indeed, Americans cannot even agree on the heroes and villains of history. If Jews can help it, all the monuments to White Southerners will be torn down while all white people must be made to worship MLK, the Negro who sold out the Palestinians because Jews filled his pocket with money.




So, what is Treason? What is Loyalty? It’s all relative. Take Benedict Arnold, denounced as the biggest traitor of the American Revolution. But couldn’t one argue that the Revolution itself was an act of treason against the Mother Country of Britain and to the King? From that perspective, Arnold's treason was an act of loyalty to the Crown. (The Spanish Civil War was especially confused because the Leftists who were 'loyal' to the Power were radicals hellbent on turning Spain upside down with communism and anarchism, whereas the rebel forces were committed to maintaining Spanish Tradition.) Of course, the Founding Fathers argued that their higher loyalty was to independence, freedom, and dignity of man. Some have argued such were mere rosy words to cosmeticize what was essentially a naked power grab by the landed gentry of the Colonies who wanted supreme power in their own hands. Granted, the example of George Washington shows that the Founders weren't out to be the New King. Rather, what they envisioned was a new kind of aristocracy, the ‘natural aristocracy’, that would be made up mostly of themselves and their descendants who were deemed to be superior in intellect and knowledge. Though Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson are usually seen as ideological opposites, both were elitist in their own unique ways. The difference was Jefferson’s style was that of an agrarian aristocrat whereas Hamilton was more urban in his disposition and preference. Jefferson thought more like a nobleman whereas Hamilton thought more like a monarch. (Oddly enough, the two styles would be wedded together by Andrew Jackson, a crude man of low origin.)
The rise of modernity and rapidity of change made the issue of loyalty and treason increasingly more difficult to resolve. It's difficult to be loyal to anything when so much is changing so fast all around you. Constancy became obsolete.
The French Revolution was a rebellion against the King. Obviously, the Revolutionaries were traitors to the monarch, the nobility, and the Church that had defined France and French culture for so long. But the Revolution argued that the rulers no longer possessed the right to rule. The Enlightenment had revealed a higher form of justice. Also, rulers must serve the people than vice versa. To the extent that the Tradition made the French people serve the king, aristocrats, and the church(that were unresponsive to the needs of the people), it was in violation of the true Theory of Justice. Thus, treason against the Old System was necessary to bring forth a New System that was worthy of the loyalty of the people who were to be liberated and elevated. They would no longer be subjects and instead become free citizens of a republic. And then, of course the Revolutionaries fell into the lethal habit of accusing one another of treason to the spirit of the Revolution, a tragedy avoided by American Revolutionaries who were less radical and less threatened by foreign powers. Later, Russian Revolution would lead to tragedies that made the French Revolution’s failures look like a picnic.

Anyway, it isn't easy to ascertain who is traitorous or loyal because it depends on one’s perspective. Indeed, everyone could be said to be both traitorous and loyal. One’s loyalty to the Old Order is treason against the New Order, and one’s loyalty to the New Order is treason against the Old Order. And as the New Order soon becomes the Old Order, it also insists on blind loyalty and commitment. The issues of loyalty and treason have still not been resolved around the American Civil War. Though the North won the war, many in the South never accepted the Northern Narrative. Also, there had been a prolonged period when the North decided to effectively bury the hatchet and make cultural peace with the South, i.e. the North would maintain its favored Narrative and the South would its own. Live and let live. Let the North honor Lincoln and Grant. Let the South accept the fact of the Union but still honor men like Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson. This noble understanding was subverted by Jews who, in seeking to totally cuck-castrate the white race into submission, have waged Total War on the Southern Narrative(which is ironic since Jews in the South had been mostly pro-Confederate).

So, what about Donald Trump? Is he a patriot or a traitor? If he is a traitor, we need to ask what he is a traitor to? Which America? After all, there is no single America. Surely, Palestinian-America differs from Jewish-America. Jewish-America sees BDS as traitorous, but Palestinian-America sees US support of Zionism as a betrayal of what 'America' should be about. And black-America hardly sees eye-to-eye with white America that has much at odds with Mexican-America. Many blacks revere men like Malcolm X who had harsh words for White America. And many whites in the South still feel affection for the Confederate flag that symbolized the South's rebellion against the Union. And whites and Mexicans(even Mexican-Americans) will remember the Alamo differently. Feminists, with the backing of Jew-run media, claim to represent Women's Interests. So, if women speak, act, or vote against the policies favored by Feminism Inc, they are said to be traitors to womynkind. Feminists say women must be more loyal to the Sisterhood than to their families. In reality, Power Feminists(like Elizabeth Holmes and Sheryl Sandberg) have more in common with Elite Men(especially Jews and globo-hustlers) than with lower class women without fancy careers, wealth, and privilege. The real conflict is between elite men/women and mass men/women. Feminists aren't out for equality. They want to rise high to be with and marry elite men.
And even within the same racial or ethnic community, there can be a wide divergence of interests. This is especially true among whites, among whom 59% generally vote Republican while the rest vote Democratic.Some white Republicans might see white Democrats as traitors to the race, while many white Democrats might see white Republicans as traitors to 'history' that will end when every corner of the world has been globalized with diversity and made Homo-Mulatto. Also, even though the US is a nation of 325 million people, only a relatively tiny share of the population has control over the media, academia, upper echelons of government, and the like. And they are the ones who usually get to decide what is what. They decide what ‘American Interests’ are. And they theorize what ‘America’ or ‘American values’ or ‘Western values’ are all about, and then they foist this formulation on all Americans via the mass media that are controlled mostly by Jews. Indeed, so much of the 'American' label is just a stamp or sticker for JEWISH power, privilege, and passions.
When we consider the people with the most power in the US(the Jews and Homos) and how they choose to define ‘America’, Trump is indeed a traitor to that ‘America’. The globo-homo elites are bored with nationhood. It's too petty and small for them. They want to play with and own all the world. They want the US to be not a fortress but an aircraft carrier. For them, Manifest Destiny continues with new wars, new propaganda, Homomania as the new missionary-crusade, Afro-worship as the New Cool, demographic imperialism, and spread of Jewish hegemony(with Anglos and Homos as favored sidekicks). Globalist elites of many nations pool their resources to gain control over the world, and all the masses of the world become mixed-up peons and helots with no right of identity, territory, or history. (Only Jews, especially in Israel, are to have that right.) The elites don't need a specified identity, territory, or history because they got what gives them the most jollies: Wealth, connections, privilege, and VIP status wherever they go. The elites speak of 'equality' and 'inclusion', but it's really just 'elititude', an invocation game of certain agreed-upon symbolism not unlike the practice of Christianity in aristocratic Europe; all those kings and noblemen hardly led lives that could be construed as genuinely Christian, but they didn't have to because they carried on with the symbolic rituals of sanctimony that shrouded them with the aura of piety. Elititude. Today, all those Western elites don't have to give up their wealth and rub shoulders with the wretched of the earth to be 'progressive'. They merely need to take selfies at a ceremony commemorating Nelson Mandela. How do you like them photo-ops by Bono with African children? After playing Pop Christ, he goes back to live in his mansion.

This ‘America’ that is favored by the Mass Media is not a sovereign nation but a jewel-in-the-crown of the real superpower in the world, the Empire of Judea(or EOJ) that has neo-imperialist globo-homo networks all over the world. Jewish power is connected via New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco, Boston, London, Paris, Berlin, Warsaw, Moscow, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Tel Aviv, and etc. Jews have powerful presence even in nations that are deemed as the enemies of the US. Jews are so powerful that even Russia, a nation that is constantly defamed by vicious Jews, must allow a bunch of Jews to hold great wealth and power. (Russians are spectacular underachievers who are so lazy, stupid, and incompetent that a handful of Jews have run circles around them time and time again. Indeed, consider the difference between the Russian Revolution and the German Revolution. Both turned out to be evil, but German Revolution of the National Socialists gained power for Germans against the Semites whereas the Russian Revolution led to the Semitic & non-Russian minority domination over vast numbers of Russian Slavs. Germans, being more capable, outmaneuvered the Jews, whereas Russians, being drunk and stupid, came under the rule of Jews who made up a tiny cabal. Alas, even though Germans were more capable, their recklessness led to WWII and their downfall, and Germans have never been able to regain their footing since. In a way, German conscientiousness came to be a thorn on its side. Though conscientiousness is generally a good thing, the relative lack of such among Russians seems to maintain their resistance to the Jews. Ironically, both Germany’s choice of National Socialism and Shoah-Guilt[or National Shame-ism] were the product of German conscientiousness. Overwhelmed by mounting poverty and degradation during the Great Depression, National Socialism seemed to offer an opportunity for Germans to rise up and do something hard and constructive to repair and rebuild the nation. It was National Will in action, and a people without conscientiousness couldn’t have chosen such a path. Germans, unlike stupid and lazy Greeks in the financial crisis several years back, were not bitching and asking for easy fix. They were willing to unite and work hard to restore German greatness again. This called for lots of work, unity, and collective sacrifice, and Germans were up to the challenge. So far so good. But then, the man the Germans put in charge, Adolf Hitler, turned out to be a mad visionary and degenerate gambler with history. Hitler exploited the conscientiousness of the Germans. He promised them a New Beginning based on hard work, sacrifice, and unity. Germans trusted him, and things seemed to be going well... until Hitler decided on imperialism, and then all hell broke loose. After the war, Germans chose the path of conscientiousness once again. They came to realize that their blind trust in Hitler-as-savior-of-Germany had led to a catastrophic war that not only destroyed millions of German lives but millions of non-German lives as well. Among the great horrors was Shoah, the killing of millions of Jews. So, Germans decided to be mindful and redeem themselves. If in the 1930s they’d put all their trust in Hitler, after WWII Germans increasingly put their trust in Jews as a holy people. When Jews didn’t rule the world, it didn’t much matter, but as Jews increasingly became the masters of the US, the most powerful nation in the world, Germans came under greater pressure to prostrate themselves before Jews as the Holy Holocaust Race that must be obeyed and worshiped like gods. And as Jews gained even more power, they went from rulers of the US to the rulers of the Empire of Judea, of which the US was the main prize. Flush with all this power, Jews are now in supremacist Judeo-Nazi mode, and they’re rabid with power.)

Given who really rules America and gets to decide what is ‘American’ or what are ‘Western values’, one could say Trump is indeed a traitor to this ‘America’. In the Brother Nathanael video above, it’s obvious that many anti-Trump voices in the media are Jewish. But then, the media are owned mostly by Jews. It’s an incestuous and inbred Jew-owned-and-run Media that hire lots of Jews to tell us that whatever Jews hate, we must hate too. Whatever Jews like, we must like to. Jews dictate to us what to hate, what to love. If Jews say it is American-as-apple-pie to support IDF death squad's killing of Palestinian protesters(calling attention to the fact that 2018 is the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map thanks to Jewish mass migration-invasion), then cheering for Zionist killers must be red, white, and blue(or red, white, and Jew). The so-called Mass Media offer us endless ‘two-minutes of hatred’, and according to Jews, Putin is the New Goldstein or Goldputin. According to the PC Narrative, one's willful deviance from this Agenda constitutes 'treason'. It's like a master shaming a dog as 'bad doggy' for refusing to fetch the ball or fight another dog.

Basically, the Mass Media is Hate News against whatever Jews hate and is Love Media for whatever Jews love(or thinks is useful to their supremacist power). All this Russia brouhaha is so much nonsense, and the ONLY reason it exists is because Jewish globo-homo imperialism hates nationalism or national autonomy/independence/sovereignty of goy peoples, especially whites. Jews are viciously hostile toward white Americans whereas Putin & Russia feel no such hostility. Jews are also hostile toward Russians. Because Russia refuses to obey Jewish Supremacists, Jews feel that Russia is 'hostile' to the Jewish Agenda; therefore, all of us(as obedient dogs) are also supposed to see Russia as hostile to us. According to Jewish logic, refusal to obey the Jewish globo-homo agenda is 'hateful' and 'hostile'. It's like Harvey Weinstein's sexual logic. Any woman who said NO to him was offending him than he was offending her. Like they say, "Jews cry out in pain as he strikes you." Jews lie about Russian Collusion when, in fact, they are the ones who colluded with Deep State and EU to get Hillary, their bitch-whore, elected. According to Jews, the only approved 'allies' of the US are its bitch-whore puppets like Japan, Canada, UK, France, Sweden, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and etc. Any nation outside the orbit of US hegemony is friend or enemy depending on how JEWS feel about it. Jews are the final judge of which nations the US can be friendly with. Jews say Israel is America's closest ally, and that must be true because... Jews say so. Jews say Russia is the #1 enemy, and it must be so because... Jews say so. Jews are masters, we are dogs. Woof. Imagine someone who says he gets to decide who gets to be your friends or enemies. If you decided to find your own friends, he calls you a traitor to yourself. Jews are like the insane jealous lover in PLAY MISTY FOR ME who tries to claim the Clint Eastwood character all to herself. A truly vile people. Jews need to own the white race in order to sustain Jewish supremacism.

After all, Jewish supremacism depends on whites serving as horsey to the Jewish rider. Jews are to serve as the mind, and whites are to serve as the obedient body. Though Russia isn’t free of malevolent Jewish influence, it is freer than the US is. Paradoxically, Russians both fell under and resisted Jewish power more fully than White America did. If German conscientiousness made Germans both radically anti-Jewish under National Socialism and excessively pro-Jewish after WWII — in both cases, the Germans were trying so very hard to do the Right Thing — , the Russian lack of conscientiousness made them easily fall under Jewish Bolsheviks and later bluntly irreverent to Jewish power. After the fall of the Tsar and under the rule of the Provisional Government, the only thing Russians cared about was ‘land, bread, and peace’, or ‘what is in it for me?’ Most had no idea what was happening or didn’t care. They just wanted ‘my little thing’. So, Russian masses were willing to throw their lot with the Bolsheviks even though the latter was calling for national defeat to the Germans. Russian masses couldn't care less. They just wanted "what’s mine". Russian moral and intellectual laziness led to this morass, something that energetic and radical Jewish Bolsheviks took advantage of. Lack of Russian conscientiousness could be manipulated by Jews. But then later, this very trait worked against Jews. Upon Stalin's outmaneuvering the Jews and later when his heirs promised More Stuff to the Russians at the expense of Jews, the Russians readily accepted the bargain. Russians didn’t care if Soviet version of ‘affirmative action’ hurt smarter Jews. They were into "What’s mine?" than for higher principles and meritocratic fair play. Also, being less conscientious, Russians are harder to guilt-bait. Besides, communism made it difficult to guilt-bait most Russians. After all, communism said capitalism is evil. Most Russians never got to practice capitalism. If anything, even communist Jews had more savvy for enterprise and came to be associated with stuff like black markets. Also, WWII meant Soviet/Russian victory over Nazism. So, that meant Russians deserved moral pride over having defeated Nazi Germany. Against such mule-headed bluntness, it was difficult for Jews to guilt-bait and manipulate. It’s more constructive to work with ‘conscientious’ dogs than with boorish bears.
Post-Soviet Russia repeated this pattern once again. Because Russians were so lazy, stupid, and slovenly, clever and greedy Jews found it easy to manipulate the Russian economy and loot much of it in the 1990s while too many Russians were drunk on vodka or imitating American pop culture. If Russians had been more conscientious, like Germans or Japanese after WWII, it would have been more difficult for Jews to pull off such a stunt. But then, Russian boorishness and crudity turned into an advantage beginning in the 2000s. Emotionally gruff and rough-n-tumble in sensibility, Russians decided to say hell with Jews and their homo puppets. They said hell to 'liberal democracy' and what the globalists were hailing as the New Normal in the 'most evolved' progress. (Paradoxically, Anglos and Germanic types can fall for immorality-as-the-new-morality more easily because they are more conscientious. Most people don't think hard about right-and-wrong. They outsource such meanings to the elites and are mainly concerned with seeming to do the right thing in the eyes of the official power. They are more concerned with Moral Approval than Moral Thought. So, if the Power says 'gay marriage' is 'more evolved', Anglos and Germanic types try so very hard to appear More Moral and win status approval. In contrast, Russians, being less conscientious, are less concerned about seeming More Moral. So, they tend to be more oblivious to the latest Official Line. And yet, this outlook maintains genuine morality because it is less sensitive about keeping-up-with-the-joneses of morality-as-fashionable-virtue-signaling.) Russian rejection of globo-homo agenda was a morally important decision but not one that was made morally. Russians stumbled into moral action because things got so bad with Jews at the helm. They wanted a strong hand to rein in the oligarchs and gangsters, and that man was Vladimir Putin. Most Russians didn’t care what Putin did as long as he made things better. Lucky for them, Putin turned out to be rather sane and sound leader with good sense for things. Anyway, because Russians tend to be neanderthal in their ways and emotions, they are harder to psychologically or morally manipulate. Jews found it easier to gain power over lazy and stupid Russians but also more difficult to maintain control over them for the long haul because Russians are so disorganized, lazy, incompetent, and lacking in conscience. In contrast, Jews found it far more difficult to gain power over Anglos and Germans, a talented hardworking people with strong sense of moral pride. But once Jews gained an edge over them, they found it easier to manipulate them psychologically and morally because Anglos and Germans really care about the principles of right and wrong(or are obsessed about seeming to care about such things as a matter of status). In the short run, it was easier for Jews to take power in Russia but, in the long run, it was harder for Jews to keep the power because Russians just wouldn't play along as they’re too lazy, childish, boorish, and difficult. In contrast, Jews were met with truly stiff competition from talented Anglos and Germans. Thus, Jews required far more energy to gain dominance in their world. Jews gained supreme power in Russia in 1917. Jews gained comparable power only in the 1980s in the US. But once Jews gained power in the US, it was easier to keep because Anglos and Anglo-ized whites did a very good job of keeping things running for their Jewish masters.
After all, the very craziness of Russia in the 90s that enabled Jews to steal so much also led to the downfall or exile of many Jews. It’s one thing to grab a lot of loot, but unless there is law and order, it’s difficult for the looters to keep all their loot. Certain Jewish oligarchs of the 1990s met a fate similar to that of Jewish Bolsheviks in the 1930s in the Great Purge. Even though Jews grabbed so much power so fast in Russia following the October Revolution, the sheer lack of Rule of Law meant that what the Jews took violently and unscrupulously could be taken from them in the same manner by someone even more cunning and ruthless than them, and that man happened to be Josef Stalin the Georgian. Russia has always been a land of bandits, peasants, gamblers, and bear-wrestlers. Jews could get such people drunk and steal their wealth, but drunken mobs can easily turn on the very people who supplied them with the drink. Jews always played on lack of conscientiousness among Russians to gain power over Russians. Jews always saw Russians as idiots and boors to whom to sell vodka, either literally or metaphorically in the intoxication of the Revolution(communism) or Riches(privatization). But the danger was that Russians-as-boors might get pissed and go 'pogrom' on the nasty Jews.
In contrast, the US was the nation that once came up with Prohibition. And the Brits, even as they allowed the Jew David Sassoon to sell opium to China, banned the sale of opium in Britain itself. Therefore, if Jews played on lack of control and conscientiousness among Russians, they played on the strong sense of self-control and conscientiousness among Anglos and Anglo-Americans. Jews did the hustle on the Anglos. Initially, Jews were full of praise for White Anglo America. Jews flattered the Anglo-Americans for having created a nation better and more just than any in Europe. But that was a bait. After all, if the US was supposed to be so wonderful and great, why did it have such-and-such problems and why did US fail to live up to all its promises? So, what began as Jewish praise turned increasingly into Jewish condemnation of White America's failure to fulfill its true 'proposition'. And Anglo-Americans, especially the Episcopalian elites, being so conscientious and sensitive about their self-image as Good People, turned into moral putty in the hands of Jews(who rarely applied similar kind of critique on their own kind and power). Anyway, even though it was far more difficult climb for Jews to take over the US(than a nation like Russia), the victory has been more complete and total because (1) white Americans can maintain a system of Rule of Law that Jews can manipulate to their own advantage and (2) white Americans are earnest about their conscientious redemption and atonement to be ‘good people’ as, of course, to be defined by Jews who control the academia, media, and pop culture(which is the only remaining culture).

When we consider the US as a vassal of the real superpower in the world, the Empire of Judea, Trump is indeed a traitor. His rapport with Putin was an act of Treason to the ‘America’ as a prized colony of the Empire of Judea(or EOJ). While there are plenty of non-Jews who also denounce Trump’s summit with Putin, most of them take their talking points from Jews. In other words, Jews lead, others follow. If Jews were to change their tune tomorrow and say Russia is no longer a problem, most of these non-Jewish dogs will stop barking. In any power system, we must distinguish who’s the master and who’s the dog. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, it would have seemed that Stalin and all his men were equally united in their passion for or against something. But was it really a consensus? Or was it Stalin’s hatred that others had to agree with. So, if Stalin hated A, his henchmen also had to hate A. If Stalin then decided to love A and hate B, his henchmen would do likewise. Same logic applies to the US. Don’t mind the barking dogs. They lack agency. They will bark to the tune of their masters. As Jews rule the US, they get to decide what is to be hated. Jews hate Russia and Putin at the moment, so ALL OF US are supposed to hate along. And because most non-Jews in the Deep State and Mass Media won’t have a career unless they obey Jews, they also spout along. Sure, they sound sincere in their hatred, but so did the henchmen of Stalin and Mao. And of Hitler. Whatever the Fuhrer said, the Nazi henchmen had to go along with. Just about everyone in the American Deep State and Media has to APPEASE their Jewish Masters if he wants to have career, reputation, and status.

The rise of Russian Nationalism led to the slipping of Jewish monopoly power in Russia. The Russian masses decided to support Putin and Russian nationalism. Putin then lent special support to the Russian Church. Jews were alarmed by this and sought to counter the development with Pussy Riot and Homomania, but Russia said Nyet. This infuriated the Jews. In contrast, Jews were able to guilt-bait, castrate, browbeat, brainwash, and heart-worm American whites(and Western Europeans) into worshiping Magic Negroes, embracing cuckery, rejecting their own racial/cultural identity, remembering Holocaustianity, and celebrating Homomania. American Whites were told they have no identity or culture of their own, and even if they did, it must be bad because whiteness is ‘racist’ and must be destroyed. But Donald Trump, the Alt Right, and Populism began to turn the tide on the Jewish Supremacist Power. More Americans began to wake up to the Globo-Homo agenda. They came to be more aware of Jewish power. And even conservative white Americans who continue to have warm feelings for Jews and Israel increasingly said NO to social and political agendas favored by Jewish elites. And this is why Jews are all panicked about Russia. Jews are no longer worried about survival. They are addicted to supremacism. After all, Russia is friendly to Jews, and lots of Jews are fabulously rich there. Even as Jews denigrate Russia and spit on Putin, Russia and Putin have been nice, welcoming, and protective of Jews. While Putin moved against the nastiest Jewish oligarchs, he kept some of them around, and if anything, he’s come down hard on outspoken anti-Jewish elements in Russia. But that’s not enough for Jews who must have supremacism. Jews believe non-Jewish nations belong to them. Since Jews cannot take them over demographically like they took over Palestine, Jews promote mass invasion-immigration on all goy nations so that the native peoples will, under the Diversity regimen, lose their sense of identity, territory, and history. And then, Jewish globalist elites will find it much easier to penetrate and take over nation after nation, not least by exploiting the art of divide-and-rule among Diversity created by mass invasion-immigration.

While Trump is clearly a traitor to the Empire of Judea, he could be seen as a patriot to America that has been envisioned as a sovereign nation with a specific history, core demography, core cultural themes(mostly rooted in Europe), and well-established borders. According to this view, the Core Americans are the European settlers who conquered, founded, and built the nation. While non-whites did their part in the development of the US, America is essentially an extension of European Civilization, and in order for the US to remain that way, its core must be white-European, especially Northern European. Patriots believe that this America must be preserved. After all, America was not founded and built by the world. Rather, it was founded by a specific group of Europeans, and later, other kinds of Europeans adapted and assimilated to this Core America that was essentially Anglo-Germanic. It has been this success story that made the US a magnet for the rest of the world that was far less successful in creating nice societies. If indeed the US belongs to all the world and must become all the world, why should people of the world have to come to the US? If the US is not a specific nation but The World, then people around the world should just stay put because US, as the World, would hardly be different from the rest of the world. On the one hand, the globo-homo-pushers say the US is an ‘exceptional’ nation, but then they say the US must become like the rest of the world. If US is so exceptional, why must it become so much like the rest of the world? Or are they saying the world is made better if they come to the US and become ‘Americans’? But what would this ‘American’ be? If US no longer has a core demography, no core culture, and no core anything and if US is always reinventing itself with more and more Mass Immigration, what would make it so ‘exceptional’? Indeed, the US narrative went from 'immigrants from the world must assimilate to American-ness' to 'American-ness must assimilate to the world'.
Of course, Jews have it all figured out. The reason why Jews welcome more Mass Invasion-Immigration is because they believe themselves to the be smartest people. If Jews really believed that newcomers could take power from them, they would say NO to more Mass Immigration. Suppose Mexicans and Muslims have an average IQ of 130 and very pushy personalities. Suppose they were to come to the US, outsmart the Jews, and take over as New Elites. Would Jews really want More Immigration then? Of course not. Jews welcome more Mass Invasion-Immigration because they know the newcomers will only be their helots, servants, and new voters. Jews know the newcomers won’t be able to compete with Jews. Asians are smarter than most immigrant groups, but East Asians are too dull-in-personality to win against Jews-with-chutzpah. And Hindus are too exotic and weird for most Americans to accept as the New Elites. Indeed, Jewish Power works a perverse duality vis-a-vis whites. On the one hand, Jews berate and shame whiteness. Jews tell whites to know their place and not act uppity. But Jews also count as ‘white’, and that means they are more acceptable to whites as elites than other groups are. So, even though many whites may increasingly sense that Jews are pretty nasty toward them, they still regard Jews-in-power as whites-in-power since Jews officially count as whites. But many whites wouldn't feel likewise if a bunch of Hindus took elite power in the US. Hindus are just too exotic. And of course, Jews understand this psychology, which is why they don’t fear Hindus very much. And Hindus understand this too. They know that whites(and blacks and browns) are less likely to accept the 'dotkins' as New Elites. For one thing, it would be seen as cutting in front of the line as most Hindus in the US are relative newcomers. So, Hindus stick close to Jews in their attainment of power and privilege. They dare not try to gain the upper-hand over Jews. In this Jewish vision of America, more and more ‘immigrants’ means more underlings of Jews. While Mexicans can out-compete ‘white trash’ and Asians can out-compete white middle class, neither will be able to out-compete Jews. Jews are too smart. They are too well-connected. They are too tribal and viciously chutzpahstic. Also, even if they shit all over whites, whites would still prefer Jewish masters than non-white masters. At the very least, white Christians can remind themselves of Judeo-Christian Values and go on pretending that Jews and White Christians are brothers-under-the-skin even though Jews continue to kick them in the balls. Jews as New Elites seem like an alien power but not entirely because Jews and white Christians go back a long time. But if the US were to come under the power of non-whites, there would be far less support for the new elites among whites. Whites will take shit from Jews(and from blacks as Magic Negroes) but not from any other people. Even as Jews berate whites for not being sufficiently welcoming to MORE non-white immigration, they aren’t looking for to parity and equality between Jews and non-white immigrants. As far as Jews are concerned, the non-whites are merely Diversity army to be used against whites. Now, what if whites side with non-whites against Jews? Jews figure that won’t happen because whites, especially white conservatives, will always favor white Jews(no matter how nasty they are) to non-whites. This is the conundrum facing the American Right. Its racial consciousness leads to preference of ‘fellow white’ Jews over non-whites, but no group is as hostile and vicious toward whites in the West than Jews are. It’s like black bears siding with brown bears in the spirit of fellowship-of-the-bear against wolves and coyotes but being attacked most by brown bears that also welcome coyotes and wolves to beat on black bears too. Jews denounce white-consciousness as 'racist' but also rely on this 'racism' as it makes whites favor Jews over others. After all, most white conservatives tend to see Israelis as WHITE Jews and Palestinians as BROWN 'ragheads'. And it is why whites generally favor Jewish power over other kinds of power. Whites aren't bothered by College admission policies that favor Jews over Asians because Jews are seen as fellow whites. So, Jews are playing a contradictory game. They revile white consciousness as 'racist' but also subtly appeal to it to keep whites favoring Jews over non-whites(such as Palestinians in the Middle East and Asians in competition for colleges).

One thing for sure, Trump’s meeting with Putin sure smoked out the true nature of the Deep State. It is so totally Jewish or cucky-wuck. All this alarm about ‘evil Putin’ and Trump’s treason is about Jewish Supremacists demanding that the US remain as part of Empire of Judea than regain independence as a sovereign nation, like Russia and Iran. Jewish supergroup supremacist imperialism hates Russian nationalism and American nationalism because nationalism is anti-imperialist. Nationalism seeks autonomy and independence from imperialist domination. The Thirteen Colonies once belonged to the British Empire. When the Colonies declared independence, the British Crown and Parliament howled TREASON. The Colonies relied on the aid of the French to fight the British. (If Russia wants to help American patriots like the France aided the American Revolutionaries, why should we care? Did the Founding Fathers say NO to French aid on the basis that France was a monarchy?) At this point, the US is no longer a free nation. After the Cold War, Jews cemented their power as the supremacist element in the US, and they steadily and surely incorporated the US into the Worldwide Network of Jewish Supremacist Power. The US is now a colony of the Empire of Judea just as the Thirteen Colonies were once the possession of the British Empire. Just as the British Empire was furious with the uppity daring of the American Revolutionaries who declared independence, Jewish supremacists are freaking out over the fact that Trump and patriotic Americans(who’ve emerged from Jewish hypnosis) are effectively demanding independence and emancipation from the Jewish Supremacist Imperialism. According to Jews, ‘America’ must remain in the Image of Jewish Power. America must obey Jews. And especially White Americans must hate their own race & culture and cuck out to blacks and be ‘inclusive’ of unceasing non-white mass invasion that will reduce the historic core population of the US into a permanent minority. This is the Jewish vision of America, and it can only see Trump’s effort at rapprochement with Russia as a threat to Jewish domination. After all, Russia was once a part of the Empire of Judea but managed to tear itself free(though not entirely) from Jewish claws. If Russia could do it, why not the US? Why not the nations of the EU? If Russia is no longer a part of EOJ, why should the US remain a vassal? EOJ, more than NATO and EU, is the real curse of the world. Though Trump is coming under lots of fire, the sheer hysteria of the Jews is giving us a clear picture of who really rules America and what their real agenda is.
All patriots must be willing to be treasonous to the Empire of Judea. To be loyal to one's nation and people requires one to commit treason against the alien overlords. For Gandhi and Nehru to be loyal to the idea of Indian Independence, they had to be treasonous to the British Empire and refuse to serve as subjects and agents of British Imperialism.

Indeed, imagine the chutzpah of these Jews who make up 2% of the US population but deign to define what is 'America' and shove this concoction down our throats and up our anuses. These Jews, so nasty and lacking in self-awareness, seem to believe that America exists to serve Jewish vanity. Any vision of America that says NO THANKS to Jewish domination is deemed as 'treason'. Well, loyalty to nation calls for treason against globo-homo empire. Such is true patriotism. And we must praise Donald Trump for having tried against all odds against the vile and vicious Jews. He is wrong on many things, but his counter-chutzpah can be amazing.

A Most Useful Slogan: "West Bank and Gaza are America’s Greatest Ally" or "Palestine is America’s Closest Ally" — An Effective Way to Expose the Most Important Fact of America: It is a Jewish-Supremacist Colony

The Left-Right(aka National Humanists or Neo-Fascists) should oft-repeat a message for all to hear: "Palestine is America’s Greatest Ally" or "West Bank and Gaza are America’s Closest Ally". What for, one may ask? For the simple reason that, before anything is possible, we must expose and examine the fundamental truth about the current state of the US, namely that it is essentially a Jewish-Supremacist colony. If politics is a struggle for influence, authority, and power, then one must clearly identify the nature of the power. It is like a doctor treating a patient. Unless the doctor correctly and honestly diagnoses the disease, he won't save the patient. Imagine if someone is dying of cancer, but the doctor treats him for everything but cancer. No matter how much money and medicine go into the treatment, the patient will surely die. Indeed, less money spent based on the correct diagnosis will be more effective than all-the-money-in-the-world spent on the wrong diagnosis. Suppose someone is suffering from a heart disease that can be treated relatively easily and inexpensively. But suppose the doctor comes up with a series of diagnoses that call for expensive treatments that never get to the core of the problem. Now, if the doctor is truly incompetent, his diagnoses may at the very least be the result of ‘honest mistakes’. He may have made the patient sicker or even killed him but didn't meant to do any harm. But suppose the doctor is a wicked creature who willfully mis-diagnosed the problem? He’d be like a crooked auto mechanic who could fix a minor problem at small cost but informs the owner of the vehicle that a lot more work needs to be done. Now, if the crooked doctor or auto mechanic did identify and fix the actual problem despite the overall fraudulence, at the very least the problem would have been dealt with. But what if a truly wicked doctor willfully mis-diagnosed the patient and made lots of money by carrying out elaborate and expensive procedures(that overlooked the real sickness) that ultimately did nothing to save the patient? It would really be a form of murder. What goes for medicine also goes for politics. A nation or society is like the human body. It is always in a state of birth and death, growth and decay, health and sickness. Just like the body regulates itself, nation or society has internal mechanisms that make sure things run right. Farmers produce food, truckers transport materials, factories make products, disposal services remove waste, fresh water is brought to residents and foul water is sent to sewage-treatment plants. But when the system breaks down, then people-with-power must take the extra-step to identify what is wrong and fix them. Every society has criminals. Every society has accidents, mistakes, and natural disasters. Every society has the problem of corruption. So, even though we prefer most problems to be solved by socio-economic factors that maintain equilibrium, there are times when the system breaks down and requires the strong hand of the government as the national physician. Think of the problems following the Great Depression of 1929. Or following the financial crisis of 2008.

The main problem of the US is that most people have no idea what kind of people has the real power. Unless people come to realize this, they won’t understand why there are certain serious problems that never go away and, if anything, get worse... just like, if you don’t know the disease, you won’t know why you’re getting sicker and sicker(despite your best efforts to regain health). It’s like Future America of IDIOCRACY couldn’t fix the crop failure because everyone from top to bottom was so convinced that Brawndo(an energy drink), being all-around elixir, couldn’t possibly do any harm to anything. So, even the crops were watered with the stuff.

So many Americans have a Brawndo-mentality. Just like the mindless confidence(bordering on faith) in Brawndo prevented people in IDIOCRACY from realizing that it is not a fixer-upper for all problems, most Americans have their own ‘brawndos’ that keep them from waking up and seeing the real truth. Many Americans believe the US is a ‘liberal democracy’ based on Rule of Law and rights protected by the Constitution. Or, if they find much that is wrong with the US, they believe that the solution to all problems is the ‘brawndo’ of Diversity and Inclusion. And they believe that Evil resides in the neo-Satan of Hate(or Hatan) that supposedly infects only the hearts of white people or right-wingers. So, even though the implosion of much of California clearly owes to Mass Invasion by non-whites, too many Americans fail to see the obvious problem as the real problem because Diversity and Inclusion are ‘brawndo’ to their ears.
There has also been horrible cultural and moral degradation of America, much of it owing to decadence of Homomania, neurosis of Jewish culture, and savagery of black culture. But, how can they be problems when we’ve all been told, day in and day out, that Homos are wonderful angels, Jews are eternal saints, and blacks are Magic Negroes? We don’t have real morality in the US that is about individuals with conscience learning to be self-critical, self-aware, and self-reforming. True morality is about personal integrity of choosing moderation, balance, and restraint over greed, gluttony, lust, pride, envy, wrath, and laziness. But capitalism, especially in the expansive US where everything seemed possible, made a mockery of favoring virtue over vice. In a world of rags-to-riches fantasies, dreams of celebrity, and universalization of pleasure, why hold anything back? Even if you are capable of delaying gratification to win the bigger prize, you are expected to indulge yourself once you are awash in money and power. So, we have shameless rich or powerful people who indulge themselves. ‘Greed is good’ because it fuels ambition. And why not go for El Dorado in the nation of Hollywood, Disneyland, and Las Vegas? Make more money, buy more, indulge more. And why not enjoy food to the fullest? So what if you grow fat. Be body-positive or sue your doctor if he tells you that you need to lose weight to regain health. And why restrain your sexuality? Lose your virginity as fast as possible like it’s a disease. Go to Spring Break and have sex with lots of strangers. Don’t worry. There are birth-control pills, contraceptives, day-after pills, penicillin, and abortion. Why deny yourself anything? You must eat and have sex to the fullest. And who said laziness is a sin? Why not be like a pothead and use lots of drugs and be like Brad Pitt’s character in TRUE ROMANCE? It’s ‘cool’. And who says anger must be checked? Be like Antifa and just attack anyone whom you deem a ‘nazi’. Or be a rapper or punk rocker and spew endless filth like degenerates. As for sin of pride, not only is it good but it can apply to any vice. So, sluts and prostitutes deserve pride. And homos into fecal penetration and trannies into penis-cutting might as own the term itself. In such a cultural climate that urges everyone to indulge shamelessly to excess, personal integrity and morality are no longer possible. If anything, vice is the New Virtue. We even have ‘mainstream’ journals and news outlets urging people to commit adultery in ‘open marriages’ or take up ‘cuckolding’. Wall Street sharks not only got to keep their vast stolen wealth after 2008 but were allowed to rake in billions more. They say fish rots from the head, and the three most exalted groups in the US are Jews, blacks, and Homos. They wallow in Vice-as-New-Virtue. With a culture that tells people that you’re a ‘loser’ unless you are having the most fun, it’s no wonder that most people watched THE WOLF OF WALL STREET not as a cautionary tale but a celebration of greed, lust, pride, envy, gluttony, sloth, and wrath all rolled into one. American Culture is now all about the Grasshopper. Even people who still work in the mode of Ants believe in Grasshopper values, i.e. they believe they must make the money to have the means to live like Grasshoppers. Even though Counterculture boomers loved to blame it all on the Reagan Yuppie 80s, the attitude really began in the 1960s when even radical leftist politics became inseparable from Sex, Drugs, and Rock & Roll. Even though the hippies claimed to be for ‘love and peace’, they were selfish jerks who thought it was their birthright to party all day and night long, while mooching off others. It’s like what Albert Brooks said of the guys in EASY RIDER. They sold cocaine to pay for their carefree self-indulgences. In time, the flaky pretensions faded away from the 60s Youth Culture, leaving only hedonism and shamelessness for later generations. Already in the bicentennial year of DAZED AND CONFUSED, the Richard Linklater film, the young ones are into partying and having a good time with little concern for ideals. As Americanism came to be about shameless hedonism and self-indulgence, personal integrity(the only basis for real morality) was no longer possible and was replaced with bogus group-idolatry and ideo-fanaticism. As Jews, blacks, and homos were sanctified the most, they were deemed to be good simply on the basis of their identities. Whatever Jews did, no matter how foul, they could invoke the Holocaust as get-out-of-jail card. And blacks only needed to cry ‘racism’ and do the Magic Negro BS. And Homos merely needed to wave the ‘rainbow’ flag and claim ‘pride’ as their own. As for the others, their primary sense of goodness derived from PC fanaticism. Being fanatical, they didn’t need to contemplate or question anything. They simply needed to drink the Kool-Aid and chant favored slogans about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’, about ‘racism’ and ‘homophobia’. They came to be about as stupid as Red Guards mindlessly quoting from Mao’s Little Red Book.

Now, being quiet inside a library is a virtue. It’s about being mindful and respectful of others who are reading or studying. It takes self-awareness and respect for knowledge. It’s about mutuality. Others respect you and you respect others in the spirit of learning and good manners. But such real morality means nothing to blacks and the PC mob. Blacks, for the simple ‘virtue’ of being black, think they have the right to disrupt a library and howl like gorillas because they, as blacks, be so sacred, magical, cool, badass, and shit. And non-black PC idiots will join along and feel so holier-than-thou because they always claim to be fighting ‘racism’ or some other ‘evil’(and are rubbing shoulders with the sacred Magic Negroes). It’s a hysterical and hyped War Morality. In war, military-morality works differently from civilian morality. In order to win the war by beating the ‘bad guys’(the other side is, of course, deemed ‘evil’), the military-morality allows all sorts of mayhem and mass-killing of even innocents that would be unthinkable in peace-time. We were led to believe that Shock and Awe in Iraq and other mass bombings were ‘justified’(even though many innocents died or were wounded) because the US was working toward the higher good of removing an evil tyrant and planting a democracy in the Middle East. PC tells its foot-soldiers that, because history is on their side against the forces of Evil, whatever they do is justified by the delusional nobility of the cause itself. These people really have mass-murder in their hearts, and they must be countered accordingly.


Anyway, the main fact of American Power is that Jews control just about everything that matters. Indeed, one could even say the US is a Jewish-Supremacist colony. How? In so many respects depending on how we define ‘supremacism’. If we define supremacism as ‘wildly disproportionate power’ held by a certain group, then Jewish Power is indeed supremacist because no group comes near Jews in having power, wealth, and influence that far exceed their share of the population. Recent census shows that Jews make up 1.7% of the US population. Now, suppose Jews controlled 10% of Wall Street, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Real Estate, Top Law Firms, Ivy League schools, Big Media, Deep State, and etc. Jews would be vastly over-represented with the 10% figure. But in fact, Jews control 95% of media and almost all of Hollywood and Las Vegas. Jews control most of the biggest players in Silicon Valley. And Jews control at least half of Wall Street. Jews control the Ivies. Jews control Deep State and foreign policy. Jews control most politicians who’ve been bought and sold by Jewish money and know that Jewish media can make or break them. Jews control most of the top law firms that even engage in Lawfare against dissident voices. And not only do Jews have all this power and wealth, but they interact and coordinate with one another across the industries and institutions. After all, look how people like Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor have not only been deplatformed and sued but denied financial services by monopoly industries controlled by Jews. In the current USA, American citizens are denied basic services of communication and consumption(of products and services) by globalist-imperialist Jews who’ve occupied much of America. And Jewish media work with Jewish Deep State and Jewish finance to ‘dox’ and destroy the livelihoods of anyone who cares about his own people. So, while a total scumbag like Marc Rich was pardoned by Bill Clinton and a lowlife weasel like Jonathan Pollard was pardoned by Obama and handed a plush job upon release, good decent patriotic white Americans who refuse to serve Jewish Supremacism get labeled as ‘white supremacist Nazis’ who aren’t allowed to enact financial transactions or communicate with people freely.
In theory, anyone can be fired for his ideological views, but in truth, it doesn’t work this way. After all, if someone is fired for being Alt Right or ‘white nationalist’, the employer suffers no consequences. But suppose a company fires someone for being Zionist or a Neocon supporter of Wars for Israel. Suppose the employer finds the person’s views to be Judeo-Nazi. Or suppose Twitter has a new policy(of working with BDS than with ADL) that favors Palestinians and denounces & bans Zionist speech as ‘hate speech’. In theory, it'd be allowed, but the Power will come down so hard on the employer or Twitter that neither would dare take any actions against Zionists EVEN IF he/it sincerely believed Zionism is evil or that Jewish Power around the world is murderous and supremacist.

To continue, Jews can be said to be ‘supremacist’ in more ways than one. Jews certainly have disproportionate power way beyond what their demographics would warrant. But suppose we argue that Jewish over-representation owes strictly to meritocracy. In other words, Jews haven’t sought supreme power but accidently ended up with it because they are naturally smarter and more studious. Still, by rules of PC, that doesn’t cut the mustard. After all, even the argument that whites do better than Sub-Saharan-West-African-Americans(or SWAA) and Meso-Americans on merit isn’t good enough. What matters is Results according to the theory of Disparate Impact. So, it doesn’t matter if whites, blacks, and browns all agreed that the tests are fair. If whites do considerably better than blacks and browns, it is an act of ‘injustice’ that perpetuates ‘white supremacy’. So, following that logic, Jewish Power would have to be condemned as ‘supremacist’ EVEN IF it was entirely based on individual merit.

But of course, Jewish Power isn’t just the result of individual talent. While many highly talented Jews did gain great success through intelligence and ability, less bright Jews have also gained lots of traction in academia, business, law, government, and other areas due to Tribal Networking. In other words, smart powerful Jews have worked together to favor their less-bright tribal brethren over more deserving non-Jews, especially European-Americans and Asians. Also, when equally smart Jew and non-Jew must go head-to-head, the Power will favor the Jew. There’s little doubt that Jewish entrepreneurs got favorable funding from banks on big projects. Also, Jews are advantaged because they have the Moral Shield. As a Holocaust People, they can’t be disgraced or destroyed no matter what they do or say(unless they offend blacks, who are deemed equally holy, as Donald Sterling learned), whereas non-Jews, especially whites, must always be careful. Furthermore, it’s far easier for non-Jews than Jews to be destroyed for this very reason. Suppose some Jewish guy said awful things about Iran, Russia, Syria, Palestinians, or whatever. Suppose he said something as crazy as Sheldon Adelson’s proposal of nuking Iran. A Jew can openly justify the Israeli death squad’s killing of Palestinian protesters. He will not lose his job, standing, or wealth. But what would happen to any goy politician, businessman, or some such IF it’s revealed that he once said something mildly critical of blacks or Israel? He could be fired, demoted, or denied funding. Rick Sanchez and Helen Thomas were gone in no time for mouthing criticism of Jewish power or Zionism. So, while goys, especially whites, must walk on eggshells and live in fear of being outed as an ‘anti-Semite’ or ‘racist’, Jews can spew any kind of filth about Palestinians, Russians, Iranians, Arabs, whites, Christians, and etc. The only people Jews must be careful about are blacks(and to a lesser degree, Homosexuals). So, there’s clearly no equality at work in how the power operates in the US. If we look into the ‘kitchen’ of power, what really happens is so different from what is presented in the dining area. Just like Anthony Bourdain’s book KITCHEN CONFIDENTIAL detailed what really happens among the chefs and owners, the more inquisitive journalists and maverick ex-insiders have been trying to inform the public about the Power Kitchen Confidential. John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt even wrote a book called THE ISRAEL LOBBY. But even among journalists and whistle-blowers with more spine, there’s been a tendency not to rock the boat on the Jewish issue. Even Wikileaks was most restrained in spilling the beans on Jewish or Israeli secrets. I guess Julian Assange knows something about what Jewish power could really do to him if it wanted to.

There is yet another layer of Jewish Supremacism. Not only are Jews vastly over-represented in elite industries & institutions and working in cahoots with one another to favor the Tribe over other groups but the sum of Jewish Power is hyper-actively working in supremacist mode in the West and the Rest(especially pertaining to the Middle East and Russia). The so-called ‘new cold war’ is Jewish War on Russia III. (Bolshevik Revolution was Jewish War on Russia I, and the Jewish economic looting of Russia in the 1990s was Jewish War on Russia II.) Jew Matthew Yglesias says American conservatives, who’d been fiercely anti-Soviet, are warming up to Russia because it’s become the center of White Nationalist Politics. The real reason is Russia managed to regain some degree of national sovereignty from Jewish supremacist domination. According to Jews like Yglesias, it is outrageous that Russians should own and control their own nation. Jews must control Russia even though they make up only 0.2% of the population. Even with such a small number, 20% of the richest people in Russia are Jewish, and they are well-protected by Putin and Russian government. If anything, they are favored over most groups. But even that isn’t enough for Jews who seek total domination. Also, American conservatives once feared the Soviet Union because it was expansive. It supported communist movements all over the world. Also, in the 40s and 50s, lots of Soviet spies in the US(many of them Jews) sent bushels of top secret material to the USSR. Jews even sent to mass-killer tyrant Stalin the secret of the Bomb. Why did Jews do this? Back then, Jewish-Americans saw the Soviet Union as the main base of Jewish Power as the so-called Russian Revolution had largely been a Jewish Revolution. And even though Stalin won out over Trotsky, there were still many Jews in the upper echelons of power in the USSR that also defeated Nazi Germany. Jewish-American support of the USSR wasn’t purely ideological or idealistic. It was tribal, especially as Stalin was initially a more fervent backer of the Zionist project. Before there was the Space Race, there was the Jew Race between USSR and the US. Stalin hoped to gain the support of World Jewry by backing Zionism, but when Israel was founded, the Jewish state threw its lot with the US that was richer and more promising in the long run as capitalist hog-heaven for Jews. That is when Stalin really turned against Jews and Zionism, and relations gradually worsened between the USSR and Jews as years passed.
At any rate, why do we need a new ‘cold war’? Unlike Jewish-Americans who actively aided and abetted the USSR, American conservatives just want peace and better relations with Russia. That’s it. All this Russian Collusion is the fetid fever-dream of Jews who are prone to projecting their own conspiratorial madness onto other peoples. According to Jews, the hunt for REAL Soviet spies in the US was a ‘witch-hunt’ and ‘Red Scare hysteria’ — Rosenbergs and Morton Sobell really were agents of Stalin — ,but the utterly bogus Trump-Russia collusion fantasy warrants each and every one of us to look under our bed for Russians, Russians, Russians. Also, Putin’s Russia is less about whiteness than about Christianity, traditionalism, and nationalism. Also, unlike the US that goes around claiming to be ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ nation that has some God-given right to invade, sanction, and destroy any nation, Russian foreign policy isn’t so ambitious. Russia didn’t lift a finger while the Jew-run US was ravaging the Middle East. Russia had to swallow the fact that Jewish-Americans colluded with Russian Jews to economically rape Russia in the 1990s. Russia stood by helplessly as the US and allies reduced Libya to a rubble. And it is Jew-run US that is aiding Saudi Arabia’s destruction of poor Yemen. Putin finally came to the rescue of Syria because the Jew-run US was using Alqaeda and ISIS to take down secular Assad. Also, Putin reacted to the US-funded coup in Ukraine that even recruited neo-Nazi elements. Imagine that, Jewish-Americans working with neo-Nazi elements to bring down a government. These ‘progressive’ types used to lament what the US did to Salvador Allende, but they have no problem with US backing forces to take down democratically elected governments in Ukraine and Egypt(that is once again ruled by the military). There’s a saying, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you." No truer words have been spoken. It is not Russia that has the missionary complex. It is the Jew-run US that has the crusader-missionary aggression to remake the world in its image. Russia is building Churches, but it’s not trying to force its Orthodox Faith on other nations. If anything, it’s the Jews and post-Christian Americans who are trying to spread Homomania as Jewish-Satanic-substitute-christianity around the world. Russia doesn’t try to force US cities to have Orthodox Church processions. It is the Jew-run US that tries to turn every national capital into Victory March grounds for Globo-Homomania as new religion of the West. Jews now control the West and decided to replace Christianity with a new faith of their own making. But Yglesias the Jew strikes out in pain as he punches Russia and American conservatives who simply want peace and mutual respect. Peace between US and Russia is triggering to Jewish supremacists like Yglesias who fear that the Russian example may spread to other white-majority nations. Is Putin’s Russia trying to spread ‘white supremacy’? Well, Putin has a strange way of carrying out such agenda. In Russia, neo-Nazi speech is strictly curtailed. If anything, it’s the Jewish globalists who are allied with neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine. Also, Putin has gone out of his way to maintain good relations with Muslims, and he’s been especially protective of Jews. Indeed, just about any Jew can travel to and invest in Russia, but many Alt Right figures would be banned there. Also, Putin’s Russia has good relations with non-white nations like China, Iran, and Syria. If anything, all the virulent anti-Arab and anti-Persian sentiments are coming from the Jewish community. But then, of course, THAT is the problem. Russia supports Syria and Iran. That is why Jews hate Putin. So much for Putin’s ‘white nationalism’. When the Jew-run West decided to sanction Russia, Putin moved closer to China and Iran. How is that ‘white nationalism’? Also, keep in mind that Poland and Hungary chose on their own to say NO to ‘refugees’ who were uprooted by the millions due to Wars for Israel instigated by Jew-run US. Jews are devious in using their bogus sympathy for ‘refugees’ to mask the fact that Wars for Israel created those ‘refugees’ in the first place. Imagine a Jew who burns down someone’s house and then feigns sympathy for the destitute family; then, the Jew insists that YOU take in the family-made-homeless by Jewish arson. And if you say NO, the Jew calls you a heartless ‘nazi’ or ‘supremacist’. Israel and its rabid backers in the US have been most instrumental in spreading wars and mayhem in the Muslim World that led to so many ‘refugees’, but notice how no one expects the Jewish nation to take in any ‘refugees’. Indeed, Israelis still illegally occupy Golan Heights and West Bank where Arabs live under Apartheid conditions. But you won’t hear much about that from Matthew Yglesias who is just another devious Jew. It’s no wonder Jews were hated universally all over the world. What is most disgusting about Jews is they bitch on and on about ‘white supremacism’, but all their favored immigration destinations have been places made by ‘white supremacism’. Indeed, Jews have supported ‘white supremacism’ when it was to their benefit. Consider how Jews celebrate the US as a ‘Nation of Immigrants’. Now, from the vantage point of American Indians, all those ‘immigrants’ were invaders whose arrival meant more westward expansion and more loss of territory to newcomers. But Jews only care about their interests. Since Jews arrived as immigrants and grew rich and fat off what the white man conquered from the Red Man, Jews celebrate the history of invasion-immigration in the US. Anyway, the reason why Jewish Supremacists like Yglesias hate Russia and American conservatives so much is because both peoples are nationalist than imperialist. Russia is for Russian national interests, and American conservatives are for American national interests. But both sides understand how they can co-exist in peace, trade, and respect one another. Jews hate national sovereignty among goy nations because it means resistance to Jewish globalist neo-imperialism. Jews believe that they, as the supreme race, should have the right to stick their noses into the affairs of all nations. Jews now see themselves as god. Just as God was said to see and know everyone and everything in the world that all belongs to Him, Jews feel they have some divine right to penetrate anywhere, lay claim to anything, and decide what is right for anyone. (Jews say Homo-Worship is compulsory for all peoples now.) What Jews once regarded as the outlook of God has become their own outlook because they no longer believe in God. There's no more need to project Jewish personality onto God. By outsourcing their neurosis to God, Ancient Jews had gained a measure of humility. (God was like a scapegod. Jewish arrogance and megalomania were pushed onto God who burned brightly with Jewish fury. Worshiping their own megalomania as a collective spiritual entity, Jews found a measure of peace. But in the absence of belief in God, Jewish arrogance remains within the Jewish soul and burns out of control.)

Jews are now a self-worshiping bunch of a**holes who thinks all nations and peoples exist to serve Jews. This is why Jews hate American conservatives and Russia. American and Russian nationalisms, though humbler, are more resilient and stronger because they know their limits and duties. American nationalism is supposed to serve Americans, and Russian nationalism is supposed to serve Russians. Why does this idea trigger Jews? Because Jews think Americans and Russians ought to serve Jews. This is why Jews spread Homomania all around. Homos are the proxies of Jews who favor the New Normal of elite minority supremacism. And this is why Jews say existing Americans are less American than Americans-yet-to-be by never-ending waves of Mass Invasion-Immigration. If existing Americans really felt they owned the nation, they would have a clearer sense of what is good for most Americans who are not Jewish. Jews hate the idea of Russians, Americans, or white people caring primarily about themselves. It’d mean they would put their own interests above those of Jews. So, Jews push any mentality and outlook among goyim to make them think less about themselves than of the Other. And since Jews are the most powerful group among the Other, they take the lion’s share of the white cucking out for the Other. One thing for sure, white Christian American concern for the Other sure favors Jews over Palestinians.

There is no doubt that Jewish power is nakedly supremacist. Jews surely control the Narrative with their ownership of the World Media. That is why, to this day, so many Americans have no idea that Jewish communists carried out mass-killings in the USSR and ruled over goyim-as-cattle. They have no idea that it was Jews who raped Russia in the 90s and led millions to die of destitution. Jews also carried out massive White Slavery by turning countless Slavic girls into sex-slaves in Israel and other parts of world networked by the Jewish mafia. Also, the wars of Bush II and Obama/Hillary were all Wars for Israel. Isn’t it funny how Jews say it’s all about spreading ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy’, but Jews have no problem working with Saudi Arabia, hiring neo-Nazis in Ukraine, and aiding Alqaeda and ISIS in Syria. Surely, the likes of Matthew Yglesias know all this, but their vile Jewish personality and tribalism apparently trump everything. Their Jewish-supremacist imperialism simply cannot tolerate the humble nationalism of nations that want to retain or regain their national sovereignty and work with other similar nations in a spirit of truce and respect. It’s like Russia and China. There’s mutual respect and sense of limits. Russia doesn’t interfere in Chinese affairs, and vice versa. Each seeks its own national interest but finds areas in which they have mutual interests. And they learned to get along. And we can have the same between US and Russia. But nasty Jews won’t have it because they want all nations to serve Jews. Jews bitch and lie about how Trump is servile to Russia when, in fact, they are really pissed because he isn’t wholly servile to Jewish Globalist Power. According to Jewish Logic, US wanting good peaceful relations with Russia is ‘appeasement’. These vile Jews invoke the language of 1939 even though they are the ones who are allied with real neo-Nazis in Ukraine, practice Apartheid in West Bank, and use IDF death squads to kill Palestinian women and children who want to see their stole homeland again. Not being servile to Jews is being servile to Russia. Any honest observer would note that if the US government is servile to one thing, it’s is Jewish Power and Israel that now operates as a vicious Judeo-Nazi state that guns down innocent Palestinians who were forced into refugees status by the Nakba Pogroms in 1948. As if that wasn’t tragic enough, Jews instigated a war in 1967 and stole West Bank and Golan Heights as well. And of course, Jews expect Americans to support their acts of warmongering and imperialism. The real servility is to Jewish Supremacism, but the likes of Yglesias are either blind or dishonest in their refusal to call out reality like it is.

Anyway, the reason why we should spread the ‘meme’ of "Palestine is our greatest ally" or "West Bank and Gaza are our greatest ally" is it makes the scales fall from our eyes and make us realize how duped and brainwashed by Jews we are. Initially, those who hear the utterance will find it absurd. They’ll think, "What? Palestine our greatest ally? West Bank and Gaza our best friends?" But then, it will provoke people to consider the slogan, "Israel is our greatest/closest ally." After all, isn’t the sentiment just as ludicrous as "Palestine is our greatest ally?" Besides, WHO said Israel is our greatest ally? Most Americans are not Jewish. So, what does Israel matter to us? Why should the passion of 1.7% of Americans be the passion of all Americans? Perhaps, Greek-Americans love Greece, but do they make us say, "Greece is our greatest ally?" Do Turkish-Americans make us say, "Turkey is our greatest friend or closest ally?" If the US and Israel are very close, it has nothing to do with what most of us really feel. It’s because Jews rule the US and used their supremacist power to favor Israeli and Jewish-globalist interests over all others. In other words, this ‘closeness’ narrative between US and Israel has been imposed by Jews. Imagine if Iranian-Americans had control of 95% of media, owned Wall Street and Hollywood, dominated Ivy League, and bought up most politicians. Suppose they tell us over and over and over through puppet politicians and front-men, "Iran is our closest ally, greatest friend, and etc." For that to be the case, Iranian-American would have to have supremacist control over us. After all, most of us being non-Iranian, there would be no reason for us to be ecstatic about globalist Iranians and their wildly out-of-proportion interests.

Granted, there is widespread American support for Jews and Israel, but then why? This also owes to Jewish supremacism. It was Jewish control of media and academia that filled so many minds with the notion of Good Jews and Evil Arabs. Hollywood gave us all those Arabs-as-terrorists movies. Hollywood has yet to make a film about the Nakba pogroms, just like it has never made a movie about the murderous Jewish role in communism or about how Jewish-American agents sent Bomb secrets to Stalin. Instead, we get stuff like ANGELS IN AMERICA where Ethel Rosenberg is some saint while anti-communists are scum. It’s all tribal. Jews defended communist agents and vilified anti-communism because so many Jews were on the radical left back then. Of course, Christianity itself spread the supremacism of the Jewish Narrative. Even though Christianity was often anti-Jewish, it disseminated the Bible, the Old along with the New, all over the world, and this came to favor the Jewish Narrative over all others when it came to the Holy Land. So, many Christians supported Zionism as a kind of neo-crusade to take back the Holy Land from the Muslims. Jews were seen as the proxy. But the kind of American Christian Zionism is really disgusting and ultimately pathetic and pitiful. It’s really about low-IQ ignoramus white Evangelicals being hoodwinked into supporting Israel despite the fact that most American Jews despise and hate Evangelical Christians. A poll few yrs back revealed that most Jews prefer even Muslims over Evangelicals. So, those white Christian dummies are being taken for a ride. They are being manipulated by Jewish money that bought up these whore politician who never shut up about ‘muh Israel, muh Israel’.

Jews constitute the most supremacist power in the US but, via their control of the media and academia(and whore politicians), they’ve created the impression that they are the main force of resistance against ‘white supremacism’. Of course, what Jews deem as ‘white supremacism’ is really just White Emancipation from White Submissivism to Jewish supremacism. Jewish masters find it incredibly uppity for whites to say NO to Jewish demands. So, if whites no longer want a ‘new cold war’ with Russia that only perpetuates Jewish supremacism, that is deemed as ‘white supremacism’ by Jews. If whites no longer want to fight more Wars for Israel and kill Muslims or get killed, that is ‘white supremacism’. No more Wars for Israel will surely end the ‘refugee crisis’, but what do Jews care? They only pretend to care about ‘refugees’ without ever addressing the fact that their Zio-supremacist wars led to the violence that uprooted so many peoples. If white people say NO to Homomania, the proxy neo-satanic-christian religion concocted by Jews, that too is ‘white supremacism’ because, for some reason, it is ‘nazi’ to feel that homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting don’t have the same biological value and moral pedigree as real sex and real love & marriage. Using Jewish moral logic, the US must have been a ‘nazi’ nation before Jews made ‘gay marriage’ law of the land. People weren't truly human prior to becoming 'more evolved' by associating homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting with rainbows and marriage. What a truly gross, disgusting, and vile people, these Jewish supremacists.

Even more outrageously, these Jews, who constantly berate white Americans for having favored their own kind over others in the past, zealously insist that Jewish and Israeli interests must take front seat over all others. Should Israel and Iran be treated equally? After all, if the US favored Iranian interests over Israeli interests, wouldn’t that be supremacist? If US is to be a totally fair global power, it would treat all nations and peoples equally. It would not play favorites. If the US were to favor one nation over another, the ONLY justification would be national interest. Now, what national interest does Israel have for the US? Does the well-being, security, survival, or prosperity of the US depend on the existence of Israel? Suppose Israel had not been founded in 1948. Would the US today be less wealthy or powerful? If anything, US relations with all of the Middle East might be much better. So, if anything, US sacrificed much of its national interest to favor Israel, the ethno-megalomanical project of Zionist Jews.

Another proof of Jewish supremacism is that Israel and only Israel among ‘Western Nations’ has sovereignty and full control of its borders. All other Western nations have no such authority. Hungary and Poland have decided to protect their borders, but they’ve come under tremendous pressure and denunciation from the Jew-run EU. But hardly anyone mentions that Israel has the toughest border walls in the world. When we look back on the imperialist histories of Britain, France, Nazi Germany, and the USSR, it’s obvious that the supreme power had the ‘right’ to go anywhere and also to keep Others/Foreigners out of the home-nation. So, the British imperialists could freely move into India, Africa, and Asia. And they could move millions of people from one place to another. They could ship blacks from Africa to West Indies. They could colonize a million Asian Indians in Africa and other parts of Asia. And Indians couldn’t say NO to British intrusion into India, and Africans couldn’t say NO to British relocation-migration of many Hindus to work as coolie labor. But, the British could keep non-British out of Britain itself. Brits could protect their home-base like Jews protect Israel from the rabble of the world. But today, both the US and EU have come under the power of the Empire of Judea, or EOJ. The US and EU are to the EOJ what India and Africa were once to the British Empire. As such, Americans and Europeans cannot say NO to the mass-migration-invasions of peoples. Indeed, their so-called leaders are not real leaders but cuck-collaborators of Jewish globalism. And via the media and academia, the Jewish Empire has even convinced the masses that ‘Diversity’ and ‘Inclusion’(another word for Invasion) are holy and healing for them. It’s like Puerto Ricans have been convinced that they should totally give up on national independence and just be part of the US empire.
But Israel is allowed the full right to accept JEWISH IMMIGRATION ONLY and to strictly patrol the borders and keep out ‘infiltrators’.
So, who has the real power? Those who have control over their own destiny have power. If they have control over their own destiny and over the destines of others, they have supremacist power. Jews not only have control over Israel but have control over US and EU. In Israel, Jews do everything to keep Israel a Jewish State. In US and EU, Jews do everything to turn them into polyglot properties of the Empire of Judea. Jews want to own those imperial possessions forever, and they know Diversity and race-mixing are the key. After all, what ended European imperialism in Africa and Asia? A united people rose up against the imperialists. Blacks united to kick out whites. Browns in India united to kick out Brits. Yellows united in Vietnam to kick out the French. In contrast, why are the white elites still in power in Latin America? Because the extensive race-mixing led to confused identities that can’t unite. Mestizos don’t identify with native folks. Also, the arrival of black slaves led to even more diversity and mixture. So, whites still rule in Latin America.
This is why Jews hate goy unity and goy nationalism. It may rise up against the EOJ and say NO to stuff like Sorosism. Just like the British moved tons of Hindus into Africa to mix things up and dominate via divide-and-rule, Jews are now pushing mass-migrations all over the world to mix up populations so that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish globo-infiltration and takeover. This is obviously a form of Jewish supremacism.

So, to wake people up to reality, we should say to everyone, "West Bank and Gaza are America’s greatest ally" or "Palestine is America’s closest ally." It’s a way of triggering people. By making them conscious of the ludicrousness of the statement, they can be led to deal with the slogan repeated by politicians and pundits, "Israel is our greatest/closest ally." Well, who said so? And just how is it more valid than "Palestine is our greatest ally?" Are Palestinians less human than Jews. Are Jews superior to other peoples? Are Jewish lives more precious than Palestinian lives?

And if the US is a ‘nation of immigrants’ that is equally open and friendly to all peoples and nations, why does it favor Jews and Israel over all others? If it was wrong for white Americans to favor fellow white nations & peoples in the past, how is it any better for the current US to favor Jews over Arabs and Iranians?
Also, if the US is about ‘human rights’ and the ‘poor huddled masses yearning to be free’, why does it favor the Judeo-Nazi state of Israel that uses IDF death squads to gun down Palestinians yearning to be free? And if Jews claim to be about justice and concern for the oppressed, why don’t Jews use Hollywood to make movies about the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map?
Also, given the Jewish globalist project of trying to Palestinianize the White Race and other peoples, it’s about time white goyim said, "We are all Palestinians now". Jews raped the Russian economy in the 90s and palestinianized the Russians. Jews used Clinton to force sanctions on Iraq that killed 100,000s of women and children. Iraqis were palestinianized. Jews used 9/11 as excuse to invade Iraq and bring about a massive civil war. More palestinianization. Jews used Obama and Hillary to destroy Libya, once the best nation in Africa, now a nation in total tatters. Libyans were also palestinianized. And Jews used Obama/Hillary to arm Jihadis and terrorists in Syria to turn that place upside down. 400,000 were killed, many more were wounded, and millions were displaced. Syrians were palestinianized. And then, Jewish power pushed all these ‘refugees’ into Europe so that Europeans would lose their ancient homelands to mass invaders. They too would be palestinianized. When we look at the doings of Jews, it’s obvious why most peoples didn’t want to take in Jews. And those that took them in soon regretted it. Jews are arrogant, megalomaniacal, and supremacist. No matter where they go, they try to take over and lord over others. They try to make others serve them while they live and eat like Effendi.

So, say it over and over and over: "West Bank and Gaza are America’s greatest and closest ally."

Sergei Eisenstein's IVAN THE TERRIBLE, a Most Relevant Film in the Age of Deepocracy against Nationalism — Shadow Plays of the Deep State, the Game of Empires, and Ruler as Tyrant and Savior

In Sergei Eisenstein’s IVAN THE TERRIBLE the characters are less people than architectural motifs with predetermined roles set in stone. Only their eyes — limpid pools with slightest room to maneuver — animate with free will. Consciousness remains suspended between dark depths and preposterous pageantry. In one instance, a man ‘lifts’ his eyelid with his finger. It's as if it takes an act of will to glimpse truth in a world heavily weighed down by power as burden or tyranny.

There is also the metaphor of cavernous spaces to convey the secretive and labyrinthine dimensions of ambition and paranoia. Shadow-lurking byzantine ceilings arch over characters whose body movements complement the distorted dementia of Slavo-gothicism.
We watch figures trying to burrow into themselves; one man shrivels into his collar like a turtle withdrawing into his shell; another recoils into hidden space like an armadillo or porcupine. It’s a veiled world teeming with vampiric forces vying for power but scurrying into darkness like mice or roaches at first sign of light. Just about every component of the film is an exaggerated symbol or twisted metaphor of souls tormented by power as cure and/or poison.

IVAN THE TERRIBLE suggests at the illusory way of power through the motif of the garb. Ivan looks magnificent in his royal outfit but the sheer ostentation also betrays insecurity and vulnerability. It’s as if he must own and control the symbols of legitimacy to just barely hold onto power in a world of so much treachery and betrayal. (Stalin understood that, without the Cult of Personality that made him an object of worship to countless comrades, he could be outmaneuvered and purged, as he and his henchmen had done to many revolutionaries who had no protective shield of symbolism. In the end, most in the inner-circle of power feared conspiring against Stalin because it’s much more difficult to destroy a god than a man. Thus, the Cult of Personality that made Stalin so powerful was really the product of his extreme insecurity.) And yet, over-dressed in magnificence, Ivan or Ivan’s trappings of power become an all-too-visible target for his resentful and envious enemies who want the 'blings' for themselves. The motif of the garb also illustrates the fluidity of power, the difficulty with which it is won and the ease with which it can be lost. For example, Kazhaki ambassadors come dressed in fabulous silk garb only to be denuded and strung up to dry. In the final scene of IVAN THE TERRIBLE PART 2, Ivan's henchmen don priestly robes while an idiot pretender-to-the-throne is goaded into wearing Ivan’s cloak.

Ivan is a shadowy figure, indeed more like a shadow of a shadow, both in the personal and historical sense. He contends with forces all around him to impose his proto-national vision in an unruly and sprawling world where downfall & disgrace are never more than few steps away from power & glory. He has to maintain his balance amidst ceaseless tremors emanating from both within and without. He cannot just settle down to being a good leader. The bulk of his energies must be committed to the bare-bone-struggle of just keeping the power. Internal intrigues, tensions by region & class, and external threats abound everywhere. The imperial nature of nascent Russia is both its strength and weakness. It is vast and domineering but also under constant threat from competing powers. It is always on war-footing whether it wants to be or not. If Russia is not pressing against others, others are pressing against Russia, eager to carve off its territories and enslave its peoples. Against such seemingly insurmountable odds, the only way to keep the power is to appear and act godlike. The concept of Divine Right of King is insufficient as practice in Ivan's universe. The ruler himself must appear divine, a god-emperor among men. Thus, at times, Ivan the Terrible is more like a Pharaoh or a Mongol Khan than a European king. He isn’t merely blessed by but has the aura of divinity. He must struggle to live and rule as long as possible because Russia cannot survive without a ruler without the will of a god.
Like the mystique of the late lord of KAGEMUSHA, Ivan’s power is a complicated interplay of myths and symbols that amplify yet also threaten to annul one another. Shadows can loom large, making the smallest object seem most ominous. But all said and done, a shadow without substance loses its mystique in the blink of an eye, as with the shadow in THE THIRD MAN that turns to be of a balloon-peddler. In KAGEMUSHA, the Takeda clan maintains its aura of invincibility through a complicated shadow play that fools rival clans into believing that the great lord full of wisdom and experience is still alive.

KAGEMUSHA - The double(thief) stumbles upon the dead lord whose persona is kept alive by the clan.

The deceptively ominous shadow in THE THIRD MAN

Ivan is too larger-than-life to entertain close friendships yet also all-too-human to play god at all times. He is a great flame that can engulf millions of lives but also a flicker that longs for quietude and intimacy. A great fire has the danger of burning out, and a candlelight can easily be snuffed out. Whether burning brightly or softly, Ivan cannot escape from the logic of power. He and the land are one, as is the case with King Arthur in EXCALIBUR who, at one point, says: "I was not born to live a man's life, but to be the stuff of future memory."
Shadows serve as a striking metaphor for power because the size of a shadow has less to do with the actual size of an object than in its relation to the light source. Then and now, so much of politics is a game of shadows, making small things loom large, making big things seem small. In nature, some animals puff themselves up to look bigger than they actually are. In the US, the shadow-play of the media have convinced so many Americans that homos constitute 25% of the population when they are only 2.5%, if that. The significance of whiteness, so crucial to the creation and development of America, has been diminished by the Jewish favoritism of themselves, blacks, homos, anti-white-male feminists, and ‘immigrants’ who are said to be ‘more American than Americans’.

Of course, cinema too developed essentially as a shadow play. The silver screen is really a shadow-projection of images on strips of celluloid. For so many people, cinema defined hyper-reality in terms of Narratives, Heroes and Villains, Truth and Falsehood. In movies, small figures can loom deceptively large and dwarf larger characters, and few directors exploited this dynamics as well as Eisenstein, especially in IVAN THE TERRIBLE, a work that conveys the illusory versus the actual terms of power. A man without substance cannot gain power by illusions alone, and yet, even the man of substance cannot maintain power without control of illusions. (One might argue George W. Bush and Obama became the ‘most powerful man in the world’ via manipulations of illusions, but they were never anything more than puppets in a shadow-play controlled by Jews and the Deep State.) After all, what were the histories of civilizations but tales of mortals playing gods, never a stable condition — just go ask Hussein and Gaddafi — but a necessary one to pull peoples and territories together into a unity of shared identity and purpose. The final image of part one of IVAN THE TERRIBLE almost literally turns the eponymous ruler into a silhouette over his dominion. Russia is stamped with his will and personality.

Ivan’s sharp-tipped goatee symbolizes power but also fragility. It is knife and feather. At times, his head tilts back, gazing upwards as if summoning consent from the gods. Yet, it also suggests resignation, an image of crucified Christ beseeching His Father, ‘Why?’ Why was Ivan chosen to carry the cross for his people, an unworthy rabble given to dissension and corruption?

It also illuminates an aspect of Ivan's life since his tormented childhood, emotionally torn and twisted by warped allegiances to ostensible allies who could be mortal enemies. It's as if Ivan was born feet first followed by painful hours before the head, traumatized and deformed, finally emerged as an act of dark miracle. Indeed, IVAN THE TERRIBLE is about the birthing(and rebirthing) pains of political consciousness, how a boy grows into a man who becomes a czar who must rule as a god. It is significant that Ivan's mother was murdered by intrigue when he was a child, scarring Ivan for life as a bitter soul longing to regain lost security(like Charles Foster Kane for ‘Rosebud’ that reminds him of mother and home), later made worse the death of his wife. It is as if Ivan is searching for that one person -- companion, friend, or confidante -- who could fill the void left by the death of his mother. It is this sentimentality that explains Ivan's initial trustfulness of those who feign loyalty and devotion.

Then, there's the motif of chess, a game where the various pieces are assigned different degrees of power. As in chess, politics is a game with players in positions of varying levels of advantage. But in the end, it all comes down to how the game is played. A powerful piece played stupidly can lose to a weaker piece played brilliantly. Latent advantage isn’t enough. A queen in chess is latently more powerful than bishop, knight, or rook but can actively lose to one or all of them acting in concert if ‘she’ is played rashly. Also, one can hold a powerful position without having agency or autonomy. Most Western leaders hold powerful positions but lack the agency of someone like Viktor Orban of Hungary who is under tremendous pressure from sorcerer Soros and his chess-piece minion-leaders. Their 'power' is decided by EOJ(the Empire of Judea) that moves them across the global chessboard.
Jews understand the game all too well. Many high positions are still filled by gentiles in the US and EU, but they are like chess pieces with latent power only. They are activated into play only when Jews decide to ‘move’ them as Judea has hegemony over Western elites who’ve been bought, blackmailed, or squeezed at every turn.

Likewise, Ivan understands that it’s not enough to be Czar. Latently, it is the strongest position to have, but its ultimate power depends on how it is played in a never-ending game of intrigues, conspiracies, and challenges. It’s like a hare is latently faster than a tortoise, but a lazy hare that rests on its laurel will lose to an active tortoise that remains in the race. One thing Russians fail to understand is that Jews are obsessive players in the game of power, and they play only to win. This is why Russians must never lower their guard or hope for some kind of compromise with Jews. Jews want it all and only on their terms. As the creators of the God who insisted He is the only God and all other gods are false, Jews are hyper-egomaniacs who believe their ethno-ego or ‘ethnogo’ is the only one that matters. All other ‘ethnogos’ must submit to the obsessive prophetic insistence of Jews. Such is the natural personality of Jews, and this is why Russians find themselves flabbergasted time and time again. Russians are like a bear that, once satiated with enough, is content to just take it easy and get along. In contrast, Jews have the ‘radical will’ that persistently and incessantly gnaws into other realms to take over. Not for nothing have Jews been so often compared with rodents and weasels. So, just when Russians thought they might have a nice Winter Olympics in 2014, the Jewish globalist media waged full propaganda war. And vicious Jews in the US State Department pulled off a coup in Ukraine. And just when the war is winding down in Syria, nasty Zionists in Israel and the US keep provoking and instigating new problems to prolong the war as long as possible. This is why Stalin didn’t trust Jews. He was adept at outmaneuvering them because he came from a part of the world famous for its thieves, crooks, and bandits. Anyway, when dealing with Jews, one must never fall back on one’s latent advantage. One must always remain in Active Play mode. It’s like Vito Corleone is the most powerful mafia boss in NY, but Sollozzo and the Tataglias make a move against him because they believe he’s grown soft and mellow. One thing Michael understands is one must keep playing the game that never has an end. When Tom Hagen suggests in THE GODFATHER PART 2 that it’s no longer worth going after Hyman Roth, Michael disagrees and decides to play the game to the very end. Roth must die. In CARLITO’S WAY, Carlito spares Benny Blanco who never stopped playing the game. It turns out to be a fatal error. When you’re in the game, you must never drop your guard or go easy on your opponent. It’s like a boxer must keep fighting for the duration for the bout. Even a champion who drops his guard and falls back on his latent advantage as top dog can be knocked out by the opponent who is still intensely in the game. Just ask Mike Tyson who overestimated himself and underestimated Buster Douglas. The most important lesson about Jews is they will never stop playing the game of power until they have everything. And even when they have everything, as they do in the US, they still carry on in smite-the-enemy mode, which is why Jews still growl and gnash their teeth in their rabid and virulent War on Whites. It is in their nature to want to become the god-race over us all.

Perhaps the most iconic moment in IVAN THE TERRIBLE is at the end of Part One where Ivan assents to Muscovites' demand that he resume the imperial role of Russian Atlas. A deep focus shot has the closeup of Ivan's profile fill one-half of the screen while a column of men and women trailing into the distance fills the other half. Ivan appears at once godly and enslaved to history. But then, Atlas was both god and slave. He possessed immense power but had to carry the burden of the world on his shoulders at all times. In the final scene, we can’t help but sense Ivan's ambiguous relation to his people, i.e. he is way above them, perched on high like an eagle(or vulture), yet intimately bound to their destiny that will also decide his.

Sergei Eisenstein immediately entered the cinematic lexicon and pantheon through his experimentation with dialectical montage, a fast-cutting and juxtaposing of loaded images for the achievement of thematic synthesis. IVAN THE TERRIBLE didn’t dispense with montage, but Eisenstein managed to create something more remarkable(surely influenced by gothic expressionism of German cinema and perhaps even Citizen Kane, and, in turn, probably having a key influence on Stone's political shadow-play NIXON). Instead of head-to-head clash of ideologically charged tropes in films like BATTLESHIP POTEMKIN and OCTOBER, the result in IVAN THE TERRIBLE is more oblique, elliptical, and elusive. It’s a world where so many forces prefer to hide and conspire in the shadows than settle accounts in a head-to-head clash and collision. The earlier films are closer in spirit to Flash Gordon, the brash hero who relishes open and honest combat. The mood of IVAN THE TERRIBLE’s is that of ‘orientalist’ Ming the Merciless or Darth Vader. It is about the hidden depths of power both in its political and psychological dimensions, and as such, it probably had an influence on Orson Welles’ OTHELLO.

Eisenstein created the impression of montage in IVAN THE TERRIBLE through means other than editing. For example, consider the CALIGARI-like angularity and jagged visual stratagems. The perspective of the camera is often at odds with(or in sharp contrast to) the poses or the gazes of lurking characters who creep in and out of frames like stalking predators or fearful prey. There is a sense of disjointedness, a world fractured and fragmented in body & soul, in need of an inspired savior who can fit together the pieces of the puzzle. In IVAN THE TERRIBLE, Eisenstein created the montage-effect not so much across frames but within the frame. Instead of the a-b-c & a-c-b connect-the-dots methodology of his earlier films(palpable with tension from the restless dynamic shuffling of images) that made him world-famous, the visual complexity of IVAN THE TERRIBLE achieves something like ideological cubism, what with so many obtuse contradictory tropes molded into a single image in which organic(and orgasmic) synthesis is denied. Unlike the early revolutionary movies where power transformed from tyranny into potency, the libido of history, IVAN THE TERRIBLE’s conception of power is haunted and venereal. It’s more like a game of poker than soccer or hockey. Power is so tainted and corrupting that it’s naive to hope for liberation from history. Rather, history will always be a sewer filled with pestilence and filth. Therefore, it takes a special kind of man to plunge into the dark depths — the ‘swamp’ as Donald Trump might call it — and soil his own body to fix things for the higher good. As in the Jesus myth, the central question is, "Can a man keep clean his soul even as he pollutes his body in the struggle against filth?" Jesus embraced the wretched of body but His soul remained pure. In politics, those who enter the game invariably become just as corrupt and dirty like everyone else(though there are exceptions like Ron Paul). But is it possible to come in contact with all the filth but still maintain one’s core integrity and honor? IVAN THE TERRIBLE presents a noble soul who contracts the leprosy and syphilis of power out of love for justice & the well-being of his subjects and ultimately manages to rise above the diseases that afflict him out of sheer will and the grace of history. Ivan is both sickly Amfortas who clings to the hope of salvation and Parsifal who goes on the quest for the Grail.
In part, IVAN THE TERRIBLE is a showcase of classic Russian chauvinism. It presents Russia as the repository of the vital qualities of man, both the primal/natural and noble/spiritual. In Part One, we see Russians as daring defenders of civilization against the barbaric Muslim-Asiatic Tartars. In Part Two, Ivan rallies his manly forces against the preciously effete Polish aristocrats in their cookie cutter palaces. Russians are shown as robust and virile in contrast to the decadent and preening Central Europeans.
Ivan himself embodies this Russian duality as a leader channeling both the boorish but forthright passion of the mob and the refined but devious treachery of the elites. It's a portrait of a man torn between royal refinement and rough reality summoning an awesome will to bridge the two realms. He desires respect and acceptance from the upper-crust, the better kind of people, but they remain disloyal & resentful, seeking Ivan’s destruction with virulence on par with the Rabbis who wanted Jesus punished and killed. (Likewise, no matter how much Putin or Trump tries to compromise and come to terms with ‘Western’ globalist elites and the Deep State controlled by Jews, he will never be accepted as a member because what he represents is anathema to the agenda of globalism.) The more Ivan comes to reflect on power, he decides upon the creation of a private army of loyal followers, but they are uncouth and vulgar, much like the samurai who serve the fallen Hidetora to their tragic end in Kurosawa's RAN. But in the end, they are the only people Ivan can trust. He is alone with the ‘people’. He once reached out for affection and respect among the elites, but his wife died and the aristocratic boyars merely played him for a fool.

The color dance sequence is Part Two is dazzling and vibrant but also sticks out like a sore thumb, not least because of the inferior color technology then in the Soviet Union. Yet, the scene serves as a deceptive counterpoint to all the dramatic buildup. Up til that moment, tensions had continued to mount, intrigues piling atop one another, treachery creeping through every crevice. The explosion of music and color as respite from the accumulating suspense despite the, as yet, lack of dramatic resolution creates a strangely surreal atmosphere where things aren't what they seem. If the dance had followed the resolution, it would have been celebratory, like the peasants singing and banging drums at the end of SEVEN SAMURAI. But as a pretense of carefree revelry when everyone knows intrigue and counter-intrigues are afoot, the dance number is actually a bait-and-switch than show-and-tell. The combination of merry laughter and mocking irony makes it all the more perverse, like the sing-and-rape scene in Stanley Kubrick’s A CLOCKWORK ORANGE and the Inquisition number in Mel Brooks’ THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD PART I.
The musical sequence also serves a similar function as the incoherent rush of images catalyzing right after Liv Ullmann steps on broken glass in PERSONA(Ingmar Bergman) or the opening dance number in MULHOLLAND DR(David Lynch). It's the false muse between light and darkness, between sense and nonsense. It's as if tensions have reached such a boiling point that some steam has to be let out of the pressure cooker lest it explode.
But inevitably, what then follows is the grim re-emergence of the plot leading to assassination and resolution. The stark contrast between the ruckus of the dance number and the nervous quietude of the assassination scene(back in b/w) makes for a jarring effect, surely intentionally anticlimactic. Likewise in THE GODFATHER, the killing of the heads of the five families seems even more profanely awesome because of its juxtaposition with the baptism of Connie’s baby.
The dance sequence also declares Ivan's final break with his former self that aspired to be someone he wasn't allowed to be. Like Guido at the end of Fellini's 8½, Ivan accepts his condition — endless intrigues, wars, and betrayals — as the circus of power, the way of doing business. He stops worrying and learns to love the power. He has given up hankering for respectability. He has accepted the dark side of power like a vampire has accepted the life of the dark.

The gargoyle-like acting styles in IVAN THE TERRIBLE range from hyperbolic to arch and stilted. Dramatically it grows wearying in moments because of the never-ending parade of iconographic poses and exaggerated gestures, at times almost inching into vaudeville territory, especially as lambasted by Sergei Prokofiev's memorable but circus-like score that seems at once to extol and mock the themes and characters.