'Closeted' is a term most often used to characterize the situation of homosexuals in the past or in present traditional(or normo-centric) societies where homos have felt the need to keep their sexual (dis)orientation to themselves out of fear of legal sanction, social rejection, or personal shame. Even after homosexuality was decriminalized in the West, some homos chose to remain 'in the closet' because they didn't want to be pigeonholed as 'gay' or didn't want the trouble of being regarded as 'perverted' or 'deviant'. After all, even if incest were made totally legal, most people would continue to look upon the behavior as gross and even vile. There was a time when most people, liberals and conservatives, thought of homosexuality to be some kind of mental illness or dark sin. And even when homosexuality was finally decriminalized in UK and US, most people(including many Liberals) regarded homosexuals as weird and even disgusting. And then, even after the psychological association stopped labeling homosexuality as a mental illness, 'gayness' was still the object of mockery, not least by popular entertainment dominated by Liberals. In some cases, Liberals played around with 'gay' themes to make the public more comfortable with the subject, but the level of camp and lampoon made homos out to be figures worthy of ridicule than respect.
That was then, this is now. At some point, especially beginning in the Clinton-Nineties, Jews in the media, academia, and entertainment decided to go all out to elevate homos into secular angels as replacement of angels in the Christian Imagination. The lowbrow form of this was TV-sitcoms, the middlebrow form garbage like PHILADELPHIA(movie by Jonathan Demme, as penance for SILENCE OF THE LAMBS that upset a lot of tootkins) & BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN(by the mercurial Ang Lee), and the highbrow form was ANGELS IN AMERICA by Tony Kushner. Apparently, Roy Cohn was a bad-bad man because he, as a Jewish Homo, worked for the American Right to get a couple of Jews killed: The Rosenbergs. To many Jews, Rosenbergs are more sacred than Otto Frank and Jonathan Pollard. Jews look out for their own, and never mind what the Rosenbergs did. The fact is the GOYIM killed them, and Roy Cohn helped.
Anyway, one thing we can all agree on is that homos have totally come out of the closet. Indeed, they went further and decided to come out of the bedroom as well. So, they now march and parade around to celebrate their deviance and perversion as a matter of 'pride'. Indeed, these vain lunatics decided 'gay pride' should just be called 'pride'. As with the term 'gay', homos(backed up by powerful Jews) decided to lay claim to an entire word for themselves. Thus, 'pride' alone now means homo-greatness. While all other groups must attach their own identity in conjunction with 'pride', homos(and trannies) merely need to mutter 'pride' to mean it's all about them. It goes to show homo vanity(and shamelessness) knows no bounds. Give these neo-aristos an inch, and they take a mile and then demand the whole world as their oyster.
Now, if homos are so brazen in their coming-out-of-the-closet celebration, why are Jews or Jewish Power so reluctant to come out of the closet? Some may argue that Jewish Power is also out of the closet in that there are so much talk of "Israel is America's Closest Ally", endless brouhaha at AIPAC rallies, and so many glowing mentions of Jewish This & Jewish That in so many media narratives and publications. And yet, in many respects, Jewish Power or Jewish Supremacist Power(or JSP) has refused to come out of the closet. Indeed, most mentions and invocations of Jewishness are meant to remind us of how vulnerable and victim-prone the Jews are, and therefore, we must do out utmost to protect the poor poor Jews from the bad bad peoples around the world(who could be just about anyone as Jews have been experts at making enemies of those who resist their filth).
In some ways, one might argue Jews revel in globo-homo celebration as a kind of proxy Jewish-Power-out-of-the-closet. Jews fear that overt exclamation and expressions of Jewish Power may lead to resentment, fear, and anxiety among the goyim as to Jewish privilege and supremacy. Therefore, Jews feel they must portray themselves more as victims than as victors. And yet, there is surely a side of Jewishness that wants to take the stage, flaunt its powers, and rub it in to the untermensch goy masses that the Jews, as the true master race, have the Power. But such would give the game away. People will feel less sympathy toward Jews and become more critical as it's only natural for a people to direct most of their criticism toward those with the most power. That means celebrations of Jewish Supremacist Victory must remain stymied. This is smart move on the part of Jews, but it must also be frustrating for Jews not to be able to stomp the foot on the face of the goyim and holler, "We got the power and get to rule over you, filthy goy scum!"
But then, given the fact that Globo-Homo agenda has essentially been a Jewish Supremacist project, celebration of its victory is a veiled glorification of Jewish Supremacist domination over the West, not least because Homomania or Queertianity has been conceived as a substitute for fading and falling Christianity, a religion that Jews have secretly(and not-so-secretly) loathed for 2,000 yrs. From the way Jews promote and celebrate Globo-Homomania as their proxy vehicle, their ethnic character comes into focus. It is evidently vile, obnoxious, sadistic, bullying, hysterical, and demented. What IDF bullets are for Palestinian children, Globo-Homo poison is for the goyim of the West. Just like IDF death squads sadistically shoot Arab children to maim or kill them in the worst way, Jews nastily and viciously rub the noses of the goyim in the globo-homo filth. In Woody Allen's CRIMES AND MISDEANORS, the woman who plays his sister recounts how her hookup partner tied her to a bed and then took a dump on her. What Jews are doing to the West is the equivalent of what happened to that poor woman. Jews are not only sore losers — consider their behavior in the wake of Donald Trump's election victory — but sour winners who love to gloat, rub it in, and take a dump on the losing side. They have no sense of honor, respect, or limits. Indeed, consider the difference between Anglo-Americans and Jews. While Anglos wiped out the Indians, they also paid tribute to the first inhabitants of the New World. In contrast, have Jews shown any recognition for the plight of Palestinians or all the Arabs/Muslims who've been victimized by Wars for Israel? No. If anything, Jews love to rub it in on the Palestinians and dehumanize them without end. It's like Jews have no sense of shame in robbing other people. In their looting of Russia, they didn't just take a big piece but tried to take EVERYTHING, indeed the entire nation. When their super cuck-monkey Obama defeated Mitt Romney in 2012, Jews at Newsweek gloated with a big middle finger to white America.
May there be another reason why Jews are pushing Globo-Homo so hard? Could it be a kind of socio-political experiment to see how the goyim and the world will react to the agenda of minority-elite-supremacism? After all, homos in so many nations are members of the elite. Even in overtly anti-homo nations, many closeted homos work tirelessly to gain footholds in many elite institutions and industries. Indeed, homo power didn't come by overnight. Even when the West was anti-homo with laws against it(and with the psychological community deeming it as a mental disease), homos had been working surreptitiously to form networks and connections. So, when their moment came to emerge from the closet, they had considerable assets and advantages in terms of know-how and know-who. Thus, homos have long been powerful elements in elite circles, and as such, one could say homos in many parts of the world represent elite-minority power. Jews and homos formed a symbiotic relationship because both (1) are minority elites (2) overlap in many key industries and institutions (3) have long felt alienated from majority-conservative(and Christian) social order (4) overflow with vanity, supremacism, neo-aristo tendencies, and/or egomania(or ethnomania in the case of Jews).
Now, given that Judaism has historically been anti-homo — indeed, it has been the source of the most stringently anti-homo value system in the world, shaping the resolutely anti-homo laws of Christianity and Islam — , there is no guarantee that Jews and homos would be natural allies. Also, given that the Nazi SA had lots of homos(whose predilections favored fascist nihilism & narcissism over communist severity & plainness), history may have been different if Ernst Rohm's faction had either outmaneuvered or forced concessions(of tolerance for homos) from Adolf Hitler & Heinrich Himmler. Being naturally aristo in taste and aspirations, homos don't make good leftists, and that is precisely why the globalist oligarchs appreciate how Jews and Homos have rewritten leftism to be all about Wall Street, Las Vegas, Hollywood, and multi-billion dollar Harvard funding the fancy-pants mugging of homos whose main obsessions are fashion, hedonism, and expensive lifestyles.
In a way, Jews couldn't be good leftists forever as well. Though there were many Jews who were genuinely committed to creating an equal and classless society out of idealism or dogma, they were too smart and talented to remain true to egalitarianism for long. In the end, they felt restless like the Albert Brooks character in LOST IN AMERICA who, upon seeing the Middle America of small towns and little people, grows bored & tired and runs off to New York to earn his millions. But, because many Jews and homos had been on the Left, if only due to a sense of alienation from majority Christian-goy or straight-moral society, their socio-economic and cultural transformations came to fallaciously reshape the meaning of leftism itself. Indeed, nothing is more idiotic than referring to current globo-progressivism as the 'left'. The argument goes as follows: Because Jews and Homos had once been on the Egalitarian Left(even if in a state of growing unease and anxiety), their metamorphosis into globalist-capitalist-imperialist-hedonist-narcissist-degenerate elitists must also be leftist. But this is like arguing, "Since China is ruled by the CCP that had once practiced communism, the capitalism that now defines that nation must also be communist." No, if a leftist stops acting like a leftist, he is no longer a leftist. It doesn't follow that, because he was once on the left, even the later non-leftist things he does are also leftist. What is often called the 'left' today is not truly leftist, no more than the current crop of globo-homo churches(that are sprouting all over like mushrooms) is truly Christian. If you drain a bottle of grape juice and fill it with orange juice, it is not grape juice. It would be a fallacy to assume it must be because it's in the grape juice bottle.
Anyway, could it be that Jews are pushing the 'Gay Agenda' as a kind of test-case of how the majority folks(of goyim and straights) would react to aggressive flaunting of minority-elite power, privilege, and supremacism? If true, it means Jews are manipulating and using the homos: Make the homos step out into the limelight first and show off their power & privilege as if the world is their oyster. And if Jews notice that the brainwashed, castrated, and cucked majority of straight folks are willing to bend over backwards(and forwards) to homo minority-elite supremacism, then maybe Jews will feel safer, securer, and more confident to also fully emerge from the closet as the true masters of the world. Jews could be acting like the Latin American guide who trails behind Indiana Jones who takes the lead and faces the initial dangers in the search for the treasure in RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK. Let Indy take the first step and get bitten by a snake or fall into a trap. Let the homo jump in the lake(that could be filled with piranhas or alligators or worse) before the Jew wades in. In many ways, Jews are obnoxious, over-zealous, and driven, but there is also a side to them that is patient, calculating, and ruthless, as with Hyman Roth in THE GODFATHER PART 2 who waited all those years to get even with the Corleones.
Anyway, the Way of the World would be much clarified if the Jews, like the homos, fully came out of the closet and shamelessly displayed their arrogance, pride, and megalomania. Sure, many goyim, especially white cucks, will only love Jews even more(like slaves who revere their proud master) because they've been so indoctrinated and conditioned to go apeshit and bananas over anything Jewish. Take that worthless cuck Charlie Kirk who can't get enough of Jewish awesomeness. If JSP(Jewish Supremacist Power) came out of the closet tomorrow and declared to the world, "We Jews are the superior masters of the world, and your duty as lowly goyim is to kiss our ass and suck our toes", it's safe to say Kirk and many others like him will be more than glad to get on their knees and kowtow before the Uber-Jewber. There are plenty of people like Lindsey Graham, John McCain, and John Hagee in the world, especially in the West, and especially in America. For them, Jews are the Chosen, the special people, and they can't think of anything more honorable and glorious than worshiping at the feet of the Tribe.
However, many other people, of both genuine right and genuine left, will rethink the Way of the World once they realize that Jews are the 'Barzini' behind the globo-homo 'Tataglia'. Also, realizing that Jews are the true supremacist-imperialists with hegemonic control over the world, people will wise up to the Jewish swindle of invoking 'white supremacy' and 'white privilege' as tricks of misdirection so as to fool the masses of goyim that the real threat to the world comes from the KKK or Neo-Nazis. ROTFL. Now, was it the KKK and Neo-Nazis who brought about all those Wars for Israel that killed so many countless Arabs/Muslims? Are the Deep State and Media Propaganda organs crawling all over with KKK members... or with murderous Zionist-imperialists and their toady cucks? Anyway, homos and even trannies are now out of the closet. It is about time that JSP, or Jewish Supremacist Power, finally and fully came out of the closet and flaunted what it's really about. Then, so many people in the West will realize why their fate are now much like that of the Palestinians.
THE GODFATHER(directed by Francis Ford Coppola and based on Mario Puzo’s novel) is an instructive movie on the nature of power, i.e. that the dynamics of rivalry isn’t only about intelligence and ability but personality and temperament. After all, smart people can be lacking in will and audacity — risk-taking is an essential element of power. Or, they could be bold and confident to the point of recklessness — consider what happened to Hitler when he attacked the USSR. There are many fine things about THE GODFATHER, and one is about the Machiavellianism of Personality as guide to Power. As the story, in parts I and II, goes from end of World War II to the Cuban Revolution — the prequel section of part II deals with young Vito Corleone’s rise in the 1920s — , there wasn’t enough time to go into nitty-gritty details of strategy and negotiations. Instead, there was a broad narrative of how the Corleones, the top mafia family in the New York area, got embroiled in a war with the other families over the issue of Narcotics. THE GODFATHER PART 2 is somewhat more detailed, but we don’t learn much beyond how Hyman Roth attempts to lure Michael Corleone into Cuba(a sinking ship) & have him assassinated and how Michael Corleone makes counter-moves in anticipation of Roth’s agenda. If THE GODFATHER movies had been a TV series(like BOARDWALK EMPIRE), they might have delved into the minutiae of sharp minds maneuvering in the ruthless game of power. But even at 6 hrs and 15 minutes, there is only enough time to portray the Corleones and their inner circle in emotional and dramatic terms. What comes across most memorably are the PERSONALITIES of the characters. And from the movie — and from countless examples from real life — , we know that personality matters. While no one gets far without brains, how far one is willing to go depends on will, drive, and nerves, all of which are shaped by personality. We see this with dogs and cats. Even among dogs or cats of same intelligence, dog personality or ‘canality’ or cat personality or ‘felinality’ goes a long way in shaping dog or cat behavior. Some dogs are more aggressive and bold. Some are more timid and cautious. Some cats are fierce and aggressive. Some are mild and gentle.
In the end, Hitler was undone by his personality and temperament. And what drove Mao to the madness of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution owed much to his manic personality. If Hitler had died in the late 30s and if someone like Hermann Goering had taken over, there would have been far less likelihood of war, let alone World War II. Ultimately, it was Hitler’s egotism & megalomania, burning will, and hubris that drove him to the reckless decision of attacking Soviet Union, whereupon the stakes became win-all or lose-all. Ideology holds meaning and logic independent of personality, but in the end, it is personalities, not ideology, that govern the world. Therefore, ideology is molded according to whims of personalities with power. So, despite the ideology of National Socialism, its fate could have been very different if led by someone with a personality starkly different from that of Hitler. And consider the contrast between Mao and Deng in Chinese history. Both came to prominence as men committed to communist ideology, but whereas Mao was megalomaniacal and visionary, Deng was pragmatic and conciliatory.
Can people control their own personality? Yes, to an extent. On their paths to power, both Hitler and Mao could be compromising and yielding. They had to be as they were at a political disadvantage. But upon gaining absolute power, their sheer egotism made it nearly impossible for either to restrain one's prophetic vision of history and one's role in it. In contrast, Stalin, despite his own megalomania, was steered by a more anxious personality. Even as a gambler, he played patiently, slowly increasing his number of chips and waiting to scavenge off the reckless moves of others.
What can be learned about the figures on the Alt Right and Dissident Right based on their respective personalities? And which GODFATHER figures do they resemble most? Finally, a question worth asking but that can only be answered by the actual practices of the figures of the Alt Right and Dissident Right is, “Can people transcend the limits of their personality flaws and choose the wiser path?” Granted, one could argue that the problem is less a matter of personality-flaws than personality-balances. In other words, every personality trait has value in the right dosage and at the right time. It’s like salt is an essential ingredient in most cooking, so the problem isn’t salt per se but insufficient or excessive salt. The personality trait of boldness is necessary in power. In sports or any competition, one can’t get anywhere without making moves that carry the element of risk. Every move on the chessboard is both an advantage and disadvantage. Every throw by the quarterback can mean a touchdown or an interception. Excessive conservatism is cautious to a fault. Caution is generally good, but too much means fear of adventure, the necessary bridge to victory. The key element in the rise of the West over the East had to do with cultural personality(which could be genetic as well). Asians had comparable intelligence and basic elements of high civilization but lacked the Western spark and spirit. Now, one could argue that Western Adventurousness led to imperialism, genocides of non-whites, slave trade, and myriad other ‘crimes’, but it also unified the world and transformed all of humanity with new paradigms and possibilities. It was tragic but also triumphant.
Now, which GODFATHER characters do Alt Right and Dissident Right figures resemble most? Let’s begin with the MSM’s favorite ‘Face of the Alt Right’ Richard Spencer.
1. Richard Spencer = Carlo Rizzi
In some ways, one might say this comparison is most unfair. Unlike Carlo, Spencer does have a mind. He is capable of cool analysis like Tom Hagen. He wants to lead than follow. He has the vision thing, and his admirers might ague he has something of Michael Corleone. Also, Spencer’s unmistakable Waspiness may warrant comparisons with Senator Geary than with an Italian-American boy like Carlo. Then, why Carlo?
Because Spencer’s fatal flaws are very much like Carlo’s. Vain, narcissistic, petty, resentful, egotistical, spoiled, and bratty. It appears Carlo grew up adored and favored among family and friends because of his good looks. That’s why Connie, the daughter of the top Mafia don, married him. He thought he could get far with his cookie-cutter looks and charm, but when the Corleone’s didn’t place him in a position of importance, he grew bitter and took his frustrations out on Connie. Also, he’s incapable of personal loyalty, a trait shared by Spencer who's been unable to keep the trust of his closest allies and wife. Spencer has the 100x the mind of Carlo and the potential to be an importance person, but his shallow personality has led him to series of humiliations and setbacks.
All said and done, Spencer expected to coast on his looks and persona. He thought the Media were swooning all over him because he’s so provocative with ideas and the girls were putting out to him because he’s so handsome. The latter may be true, but the media were only using him.
Even so, he had a golden opportunity as the world, if only for a moment, descended on him as the Face of the Alt Right. But then, he blew it all away with reckless gestures and stupid alliances. When a man of intelligence has the personality of a fool, personality wins. For example, Spencer’s recent spat with Nicholas Fuentes makes no sense. Fuentes is an up-and-coming 20 yr old. Spencer is twice the age with double the experience. He should be playing the role of captain of an exciting movement, but he’s wasting his time squabbling with captains of smaller ships who just wanna do their own thing. Spencer pontificates about the vanguard but is too busy turning his head at those behind or beside him to fix his gaze toward the finish line.
2. Nick Fuentes = Moe Greene
Nick Fuentes’ fame or notoriety owes to his ridiculously young age. As a freshman in college, he was quickly spotted/scouted as a bundle of energy, a new face with quick wit and fiery passion. He is exactly the kind of person that Conservatism Inc and Neocons want on their side. The problem is people with real intelligence and passion don’t want to be told what to think and do. It’s no wonder that Establishment Politics usually ends up with those with brains but lacking in passion or those with passion but lacking in brains. Those with brains are likely to know what is really happening but generally lack the spine to stick up for their own beliefs and convictions. So, most brains just go along and become ‘paycheck conservatives’. Well, it’s a living. As for those with passion but no brains — the average SJW type — , they are happy to be barking dogs of the System.
It seems the ONLY people with real brains and real passion in the System are Jews because the status quo allows Jews to be passionately Jewish and work for Jewish interests. As white goyim aren't allowed passion for their own identity, they must mute white consciousness if they seek admittance into the System. White goyim in the West are essentially like Palestinians in West Bank. Their only chance of entry is by accommodating themselves as collaborators to the Jewish Supremacist System. Because Fuentes has a genuine independent streak and refused to play ball with Neocon Inc., he was expelled by Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire, and he chose the path of Indie-Conservatism.
For awhile, he was associated with the Alt Right, but again, his independent personality recoiled from what he found to be morally ugly(the flirtation with Neo-Nazi elements) or strategically foolish(the optics debate on political aesthetics). Fast mind and fiery heart have served Fuentes well in terms of integrity. He missed a golden opportunity in career in politics by daring to mention the JQ during his stint at Daily Wire, but this is different from Spencer’s dropping the ball. Fuentes lost out because of personal honesty, whereas Spencer went from failure to failure by making awful alliances with morons and clowns like Andrew Anglin, Matt Heimbach, Chris Cantwell, and etc. As Ramzpaul said, the Alt Right’s advantage was in being an alternative to both Neocon GOP and old Neo-Nazi garbage.
So far, the positive qualities of Fuentes have been mentioned. What are his negative sides, and why is he like Moe Greene? Fuentes is often immature and bratty, on occasion even obnoxious. He is hot-tempered and goes off the rails when he feels slighted, often disproportionately. His mudslinging with James Allsup made both look stupid, but Fuentes came off worse because his nastiness was so vicious, unrelenting, and unhinged. Nick the Knife relishes a fight, and he just doesn’t know when to stop. It’s not enough to slice or stick the guy. Fuentes has to push the blade all the way in, twist it, and then rub salt on the wound. There is almost a sadistic glee in his personal attacks on people that take on aspects of torture porn.
Also, because of excessive pride, Fuentes is too easily dismissive of views and ideas that doesn’t jibe with his worldview and morality, and this is especially true when it comes to Catholic vs Pagan debate. His self-righteous sadistic side just can’t resist putting on the robe of the grand inquisitor and insulting neo-pagans and stretching them on the rack.
Like Moe Greene, he can’t check himself when he gets into a fight. It quickly becomes personal and toxic, and it’s kill-or-be-killed. Also, because Fuentes is too quick to judge, he has a tendency to willfully misread others' statements and intentions. When it came to Spencer vs Fuentes I, Spencer had the moral advantage because Fuentes willfully misinterpreted what Spencer meant by pedophiles and child porn. But in Fuentes vs Spencer II, Spencer is clearly in the wrong because he dug up the hatchet and flailed away at Fuentes(and just about everyone else in what seemed like a demented rant to reclaim the Alt Right as a Spencentric Movement). Perhaps, Fuentes is drawn to Catholicism because he intuitively surmises that his hot ego, if unregulated by faith in God, can easily fly off the handle like that of fellow Latin Mussolini. It’s like a willful dog needs an especially powerful leash to restrain it from running wild and crazy. But for Fuentes, his Catholic leash has become more than a check on his emotions. It has become a check on his intellect and imagination, even to the point of dismissing evolution and entertaining the retarded notion of geocentrism. It has also become an easy whip of moral indignation. In this, Fuentes has something in common with the young Pat Buchanan who, as a young conservative, was an odd-man-out in Columbia Journalism school filled with Liberals(as recounted in his delightful autobiography RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING). Buchanan always had brains and passion, but his overt Catholicism limited his imagination and scope as a thinker, culture critic, and politician. It’s interesting that Fuentes is most like Buchanan but most admires Donald Trump who, being free of religious dogma, has been able to forge a new style of politics. In the end, the problem isn’t religiosity per se. It is dogmatism and excessive piety as crutch of righteousness. Some of Fuentes’ religious rambling is as counter-factual and unthinking as the PC derangement of the SJW-NPC types.
3. Jim Goad = Sonny Corleone
To be fair to Jim Goad, he insists he’s not part of the Alt Right or even Dissident Right. Goad sees himself as a maverick thinker, maybe in the tradition of Gonzo journalist Hunter Thompson. His columns read like Mike Royko writing for Hustler. Like Fred Reed, he is as likely to piss off the Right as the Left. But given that the current dogma is PC, a tool of proggy globalism, Goad’s worldview is currently more aligned with the Right. Same is true of Youtube personality Styxhexenhammer666 who, under normal circumstances, would not be considered as part of the Right. But because of PC-domination in industry and institutions, even a larping ‘satanist’ like Styx often finds himself making common cause with the Right against the Zio-Globo-Homo-‘left’ that spearheads efforts to shut down Free Speech and Free Spend. If one knows Jim Goad only by his columns, one will have noticed the smarts(of books and streets), toughness, and wit. Goad is often a gifted writer with turns of phrases that are as humorous as ham-fisted. If Curly(of the Three Stooges) were a polemicist than a clown, he might have written like Jim Goad. Funny, inspired, crazy, and exaperating. Goad is also an equal opportunity offender, which is what makes him most like Mike Royko, albeit in a bare-knuckle and breaking-the-balls way.
Also, just because he hates your enemies doesn’t mean you likes you any better. Goad attacks both SJW’s and religious types for delusional thinking and holier-than-thou piety. He sees all kinds of religiosity and dogma as a crutch for weak minds and infantile souls. His view of life is essentially the school of Mean Streets existentialism. Everyone must accept his or her own journey in life, take the blows, give as well as they get, lick their wounds, and crawl back home to bed. Goad says his views changed a lot over the years, and some of his pieces are very confessional. Goad doesn’t confess to priests but to the world. One might find parallels between Goad(as his own god) and the Harvey Keitel character in BAD LIEUTENANT, albeit with a much bigger pud as Goad often likes to point out. There is a reason why Goad has a cult-following. In a world with so much born-again hokum on the ‘right’ and save-the-world hysteria on the ‘left’, some people find Goad’s hard-boiled ‘Mike Hammer’ style of writing refreshing and even liberating. You can’t get any more honest than writing a confessional piece about how you got your penis sucked by a black teenager in your youth.
But there is a disturbing aspect to Jim Goad’s character, and one wonders if Goad’s toughness is genuine or an exaggerated defensive mechanism concealing a fragile soul. People who always act tough are often trying to hide something wounded and vulnerable that they can’t or don’t want to deal with. Goad has spoken of his abusive father, but his own behavior and persona have often been abusive to the point of pathology. It’s fair game for Jim Goad to make fun of other people’s looks when such is relevant. If some fat green-haired feminist passes herself as hot stuff, mocking her looks is justified because they’re part of her shtick. Or one can’t fault Goad for making Matt Forney’s obesity because Forney has positioned himself as sexual guru or hot stuff with women. But when Roger Ebert was lying in bed in a pitiable state dying of cancer, it took a truly demented mentality to mock Ebert's appearance. It’s especially sickening when one considers Jim Goad’s first wife died of cancer, and he himself had brain tumor removed. It would have been fair game to attack Ebert’s politics or opinions, but his physical state had NOTHING to do with the issue at hand, and Goad’s nastiness just seemed vicious and cruel. But Goad is so often hotheaded, angry, thuggish, and blowing steam from every orifice that he seems unaware of how monstrous he can be. And it is in this respect that Goad is like Sonny Corleone whose rage often gets the best of him. Granted, Goad is smarter than Sonny, but this makes Goad’s dementia even more infuriating as one would think a man who has been through so much should know better. Rage may feel good and even win over fans who like a good fight, but it can just as easily lead men astray... which is what happened with Goad in his encounter with the Irony Bros.
4. Irony Bros = Assassins
Irony Bros seem to have Alt Right or Dissident Right sympathies, but their main shtick is to mock anyone in the movement who takes himself too seriously. Beardson is reportedly an atheist whereas Shawn is a Christian, but there is hardly any difference in their irreverent approach to their targets, which could be just about anyone. Beardson gained notoriety by baiting Matt Forney, but it seems they've become ‘friends’ since. So, everything the Irony Bros does has to be taken with a grain of salt. They are driven by trollogy, not ideology, even if they may have ideological leanings in the rightward direction, not least because the enemy of free speech and freedom in general now comes from the globo-homo ‘left’.
One could argue that Irony Bros are bad for the movement. Spencer surmises that they might be working for the Fed(LOL). Some might say they are toxic in their nihilism and nastiness. All very true, but one can’t expect too much from trolls. Irony Bros are essentially jesters and pranksters, like the Yippies in the 1960s. For that very reason, they can be an auto-subversive element on the Right. But then, a movement led by people who can’t sometimes laugh at themselves has become a bit stiff and stodgy. Furthermore, while Irony Bros sometimes do ‘punch to the right’, they can be merciless in trolling the ‘left’. The trick is not to fall into the trap of taking anything by them too seriously, which is precisely what Jim Goad did in the now infamous Luke Ford Saturday Night Massacre Livestream. Ironically, even though Matt Forney and Jim Goad want to tear off each other’s balls, they have one thing in common in having been trolled by Beardson Beardly. Irony Bros are essentially like hired-killers in THE GODFATHER. They just enjoy the ritual bloodbath of massacring sacred cows and big egos. So, just like the hired goons in THE GODFATHER will mow down anyone for the right price, Irony Bros will spray bullets onto any target for good times. Naturally, one cannot have a honest or ‘good faith’ argument with such personalities, but Goad fell for the trap, exposing himself to ridicule and death by thousand cuts. Irony Bros mow down Jim Goad:
5. Matt Forney = Philip Tattaglia
Some people say Matt Forney is a talented writer, but I never bothered to read his books or articles. I did skim over his attack on Ann Sterzinger, and it just made everyone look foolish. The general impression from his dealings with other people suggests an insecurity that hides behind exaggerated manhood, conviction, or animus. More than anything, he seems eager to be accepted by his 'superiors'. So, for a while, he was the sidekick of Roosh. Never mind he made a rather ridiculous figure for Manosphere and advice on picking up women. Then, when Richard Spencer’s wing of the Alt Right foolishly attacked Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents, Forney piled on, especially by calling out on Johnson’s reputed homosexuality, as if playing lapdog to Spencer & Co. might score some points with the Big Boys. Of course, Spencer felt nothing but scorn for such an eager-beaver. Now, this isn’t to say that Forney’s revulsion for Johnson wasn’t genuine, but his frothing-at-the-mouth during the ugly incident came across as 'desperate to be with the in-crowd'. It’s like what an unpopular fat kid does to up his chances of admittance into a fraternity. At the very least, someone like Goad has the spine to go his own way and stand on his own two feet. In contrast, Forney is a stray dog in search of a master who may put a collar around it for keeps. And it is this side of Forney that makes him like Philip Tattaglia. Tattaglia is a big time gangster but a pimp. He lacks big ideas and has to latch onto Barzini and Sollozzo. As Vito Corleone said of Tattaglia, he couldn’t have outfought Santino(Sonny) on his own. Indeed, Goad vs Forney was like a wolf mauling a bulldog, that was until Forney was saved by Aurini the dane or Irony Bros weasels.
That said, it seems Forney in recent yrs has grown more independent in will and ego. His Terror House Magazine may be a start of something important if it attracts writers of talent and insight. Maybe Forney finally learned the lesson of his former hero Jim Goad: If you're naturally a strange and eccentric kid, you have to forge your own path and not give a damn what others think.
6. Mike Enoch = Sollozo the ‘Turk’
Mike Enoch of The Daily Shoah has been one of the most abrasive and hard-hitting members of the Alt Right. His approach is no-holds-barred and cuts to the bone. He strikes fast and hard, and members of the MSM that tried to hoodwink him got owned. Also, because he’s not a dreamy-eyed visionary like Spencer, he focuses on real power and real problems. His head isn’t up in the clouds with fantasies of conquering stars and being Darth Vader of the galaxies. He stares closely at those with real power in the West, and of course, it’s the Jews. When it comes to dissecting real power and cutting open the cancerous tumor, Enoch is like a surgeon with a butcher’s knife. He is utterly brutal but has a keen surgical eye in spotting the heart-of-the-matter amidst the bloodletting. Because of Enoch’s slaughterhouse Texas-Chainsaw-Massacre approach to political analysis, he isn’t for everyone, which is precisely why his show is called The Daily Shoah.
And it is for this brutal honesty that Enoch is like Sollozzo the Turk. Whatever one may say of Sollozzo, he is the most honest gangster in NY. The Corleones and other families put on airs of respectability and take care to appear semi-legitimate. Even the Five Families that are drawn to the narcotics trade want it keep it ‘controlled’. Sollozzo, in contrast, has fewer inhibitions about what gangsterism is really about. Also, he enjoys doing his own killings. He feels no shame in being a hoodlum. He wears corruption on his sleeve. In a similar vein, Enoch is a brutally honest Alt Right thug. Nick Fuentes might say Enoch has troublesome optics. Undoubtedly, Mike Enoch has been one of the most uninhibited of Alt Right figures. He doesn’t shroud his racial politics with talk of Faustian-Nietzschean something-or-other or Christian sanctimony. As far as he’s concerned, Jews run just about everything, and Jews shit on whites. So, whites must shit back on Jews. Jews are a bunch of crooks and gangsters, and they must be exposed as such, and whites must fight like gangsters to expose and shame the Jews. Enoch’s bear-wrestling style of Alt Right politics certainly has its advantages. It is more honest than most.
But he shares the ugly aspects of Sollozzo as well. Sollozzo is so hellbent on getting what he wants that he oversteps the bounds of gangsterism. Being an honest crook is one thing, but there is a thing called honor even among thieves. Sollozzo is such a total gangster that he will break every rule in the book to get things his way. No system and no movement can operate on sheer brutality alone. Sollozzo is so dogged and driven that after his first hit on Vito Corleone, he goes for a second attempt at the hospital. And given his nature, no one trusts him. Either you side with him or you kill him(because he will kill you otherwise). In the end, it didn’t turn out so good for Sollozzo. Michael read him correctly and figured that either Sollozzo is killed or he will keep coming after the Corleones one way or another. In a similar manner, Enoch is nothing if not dogged in his pursuit of the enemy, namely the Jews. But because he’s so aggressive and brutal in his animus, he’s often been mistaken for madman lunatic.
In his role with TDS(The Daily Shoah), it’s most likely that he was ‘larping’ or pulling pranks, but what works in roughhouse satire doesn’t translate well in the streets. Howard Stern is amusing as a shock-jock radio personality, but his shtick would be way out of line in politics. If Enoch had limited himself to being a shock-jock of the Alt Right, his boorish crudity could have been appreciated for what it is. But when he pulled ‘Nazi’ shit in public events meant to convey a larger political message, he was just being ugly and demented. He failed to remind himself that satire and politics work differently. Now, is it possible that Mike Enoch is a genuine Neo-Nazi? I don’t believe it as he seems too smart and knowledgeable. Granted, a smart person could be psycho, in which case he might really be for Neo-Nazi nuttery. But Enoch doesn’t seem insane. So, my take is that he was ‘larping’ with Nazi salutes and pulling other such stunts in public events to show what a ‘badass’ he is, a real Alt Right gangster who fights hard and takes no prisoners. But just like Sollozzo with his moves, Enoch overestimated the momentum of the Alt Right and his role in it. In the end, he just made it more difficult for more sober and saner members of the Alt Right to reach out to Middle America.
7. Jean-Francois Gariepy = Peter Clemenza
It’s generally understood that J.F. Gariepy’s The Public Space is the best Youtube forum on Alt Right and Dissident Right matters. The Gariepy approach is to be edgy and controversial without giving undue offense by violating Youtube’s Terms of Service on ‘hate speech’. This isn’t easy because ‘hate speech’ is an Orwellian term invoked by the Power to shut down whatever speech it doesn’t like. Consider how Jared Taylor has been banned from Twitter and some of his American Renaissance videos have effectively been censored on Youtube: It’s been placed in ‘limited state’, which is more Orwellian BS.
How has Gariepy been able to succeed where many others have failed. He comes across as jovial & friendly and will engage anyone from right to the left with a professionalism that is generally lacking in the Amateur Hour style of Youtube commentary. In this, he is sort of like Clemenza, the seemingly easygoing gangster who is liked by the members of the Corleone family. But deep down inside, Clemenza is a killer just like the rest of them, and when push comes to shove, he delivers. And there’s no mistaking that Gariepy, for all his civility and warmth, has hardcore convictions when it comes to identity and survival of the West. He is a warrior at the core with a gun or knife inside his sleeve. But just like Clemenza, he cannot be the leader of the movement, the spearhead. He functions as a reliable operator who keeps ideas and spirits flowing through the Alt-Right-sphere.
8. Stefan Molyneux = Tom Hagen
Like Jim Goad, Stefan Molyneux has insisted he is not part of the Alt Right or even the Dissident Right. Molyneux sees himself as a libertarian who happens to be conscious of racial diversity or HBS(human-biodiversity). The difference is that if the Alt Right tends to put Race at the center of ideology, Molyneux favors individualism and freedom above all. To preserve the culture of liberty and trust in the modern world, Molyneux believes it would be disastrous to allow massive inflows of lower-IQ people from Africa, Muslim World, and Latin America. So, if Alt Right defends race for race’s sake, Molyneux defends racial preservation of the West as the necessary condition for maintaining the hallmarks of modern Western Civilization: Rule of Law, Free Markets, Property Rights, Individual Liberty, and etc. But no matter how much Molyneux protests against being pigeonholed as a ‘rightist’ or race-ist, the fact is a person is as much defined by his enemies, haters, and detractors as by himself and his admirers. Molyneux has a lot of enemies and haters, and most of them are on the Proggy side. As far they're concerned, no amount of self-justification on Molyneux's part can absolve his thought-crimes of 'white supremacism'.
And yet, because Molyneux prefers ideas and values more than identity rooted in race or tribe, he tries to maintain his cool and explain his positions as evaluations based on evidence and reason than on blood-and-guts passion. His approach is ‘business’ than ‘personal’, and this makes him rather like Tom Hagen. Though an emotional person like any of us, Molyneux’s persona on Youtube is as a popular philosopher who logically puts forth arguments stamped with rationalist pedigree. Molyneux is like a lawyer of philosophy, and it is why many on the ‘left’ are infuriated because he won't just come out of the 'racist' closet so that they could all pile on him as a 'nazi'. But, he has exasperated some on the Alt Right as well because they see Molyneux as espousing Alt Right ideas without giving due credit and without taking sides where it really counts. They see him as essentially a Man of the Right who refuses to get ‘personal’ in the culture war because of his conceit of neutrality grounded in empathy with all things. He’s not a wartime consiglieri.
9. Kevin Michael Grace = Jack Woltz
Jack Woltz is a Jewish Hollywood mogul and pervert whereas Kevin Michael Grace is a Catholic Reactionary, so they don’t have much in common in terms of culture or values. But both are devilishly opinionated and dig in their heels on things that really matter to them. Even though KMG isn’t part of the Alt Right, he is more than your ordinary Catholic Reactionary. He has bohemian taste in the arts & culture, is conversant on matters of HBD(human bio-diversity), and addresses the JQ(in ways that most Catholics might feel uncomfortable), though, to be sure, he is a also a staunch supporter of Zionism(at least within Israeli borders). KMG used to have a show with Kevin Steel, but the chemistry wasn’t there as Steel was too much like the bland Andy Richter in the early Conan O’Brien show.
KMG’s chemistry with Luke Ford is much better as Ford gives ample space to KMG’s opinionizing while offering his own perspectives, often in counter to KMG’s own. It works like oil and vinegar. To the best of my knowledge, KMG has had almost no direct relation with members of the Alt Right, the exceptions being a few Alt Right figures who joined Luke Ford’s Youtube Livestream. KMG agrees with Greg Johnson and Luke Ford that Richard Spencer was most responsible for running the Alt Right wagon into the ditch. KMG’s strength is curiosity + experience + knowledge + opinion. Some people know a lot but lack passion. Some people are full of passion but lack depth and knowledge. KMG makes for interesting personality because he knows a lot and has heart-in-the-game. Sometimes, his opinionated views may come across as intolerant, bilious, & contemptuous, and his inability to suppress his real feelings has resulted in nasty(and hilarious) spats with Jim Goad the hardline atheist and David Ebert the moral relativist.
10. Voxday = Hyman Roth
Hyman Roth is nothing if not intelligent, and Vox Day claims to be high-IQ himself. (He does lack Roth’s modesty even if false.) Also, like Hyman Roth, Vox Day goes for the Big Picture. With background in science-fiction, his thought-processes are more analytical and systematic than that of Richard Spencer the Nihilo-Romanticist. Spencer’s idea of Sci-Fi is STAR WARS, and he gets all excited like Captain Kirk on STAR TREK. Vox Day barely reveals his emotions even when upset with certain individuals or ideas. He has an air of Zen about him, sometimes talking like a robot or Dr. Spock. Instead of expressing rage, he drolly tears apart his opponents like a child removing wings and legs of an insect. In the exasperating debate with Andrew Anglin, he kept his cool while Anglin's emotions were all over the map. Vox calmly kept his head above water while Anglin thrashed wildly to keep himself from drowning. It was like the swimming match in BREAKING AWAY between the college jock and townie played by Dennis Quaid. One almost got the impression that Vox was taking pity on the Daily Stormer hick and lending him a hand underwater to keep him afloat.
Hyman Roth also almost never shows his emotions, though his rage flared briefly when provoked by Michael Corleone. Despite his been-there-done-that demeanor, Roth is a ferocious character who, upon developing a grudge, just can’t let it go until he gets his vengeance. He is calm waves above but violent undercurrents below. Michael Corleone is his Moby Dick to harpoon and destroy. Despite his diplomacy with Michael Corleone, he can't let go of the fact that Moe Greene, almost like a son to him(and fellow Tribesman), was killed by the Corleones. So, Roth is sworn to the destruction of Michael Corleone no matter the time and cost.
This obsessive side of Roth can be seen in Vox Day, especially in his near-maniacal agenda to destroy Jordan Peterson. Most people are take-it-or-leave-it on the subject of Peterson, but Vox Day reacted to Peterson as though the Canadian superstar violated some fundamental principle of the universe. Thus, Peterson isn’t just a bad guy or charlatan but akin to an evil scientist or grand sorcerer of sci-fi or fantasy novels who must be utterly defeated to restore balance to the world. Vox Day’s war on Peterson isn’t merely over ideas or issues of character. Peterson obviously triggered Vox Day in a way that most people can’t fathom. Vox Day took it 'personally'(even though the two men never met) because Vox has his own grand theory of the world. As Peterson’s worldview is so at odds with Vox's own, it’s like a gangster turf war among Big Think philosophers.
Now, why would Vox Day be so upset with Peterson in particular when, surely, there are so many other thinkers Vox Day disagrees with? It’s because Jordan Peterson has been promoted by the media as a 'man of the right' who stands up to Political Correctness. Being Anti-PC is the proud battle flag of the Alt Right; therefore, as Vox Day sees it, only genuine Alt Rightists and Dissident Rightists should have the right to carry the banner. But there is Jordan Peterson propped up by the powers-that-be as a courageous member of the 'Intellectual Dark Web' when, from Vox Day’s perspective, the man is nothing but just another Establishmentarian shill. Most people can ignore or get over the cult of Jordan Peterson and move onto something else, but Vox Day can’t let it go. He feels he must carry on with the anti-Peterson vendetta until Peterson’s reputation is utterly exposed and destroyed(at least in Alt Right circles in which Vox Day has not insignificant influence).
11. Jared Taylor = Senator Patrick Geary
This is an unfair comparison in more ways than one. Unlike Geary, who is a rank hypocrite and sleazebag, Jared Taylor has been a man of dignity and principle. Unlike Richard Spencer who acts debonair(modeled on 007?) in interviews but does airhead things in most other occasions, Taylor has been genuinely respectable at all times, and even many of his enemies admit that he is a gentleman in the best sense of the word. Then, why is he like Geary? Oddly enough, it is the primacy of respectability itself in the lives of both men. Even though Geary's respectability is bogus whereas Taylor's is genuine, both men are concerned above all with maintaining the image of respectability. Geary is a sexual pervert, which makes him an easy target for blackmail. But his career relies on respectability, and so, he will do ANYTHING to put forth a clean image of himself. Jared Taylor espouses views that are most un-respectable in today's elite circles of media and academia, but he is ever mindful to come across as respectable. But, no matter how civil and refined he acts, the powers-that-be will paint him as a 'white supremacist' and 'neo-Nazi'. Does this mean that Taylor should drop his manners and act like Andrew Anglin since ADL and SPLC will always put them in the same hole? Of course not. If you're not a white supremacist or Neo-Nazi, there is no reason to act like one just because the media paint a Hitler mustache on you no matter what.
Still, Taylor's commitment to respectability has made him delusional in hoping that American Renaissance(his outfit) will ever make inroads into higher respectable circles because of the good manners of the attendees at its conferences. Style is important, but the truth is ADL and SPLC(and the vast Jewish Network) will always characterize the substance of Jared Taylor's ideas as 'white supremacist'.
And it doesn't matter how pro-Jewish or pro-Zionist Taylor insists he is. Given that Holocaustianity and Jew-Worship are the biggest 'religions' in the West, Taylor thinks he can score points by praising Jews, but in fact, most Jews hate him because his mission of 'white advocacy' implies emancipation of white consciousness from serving the Other. To Jews, they themselves are the main constituents of this Other. Only with continuous injection of 'white guilt' drug into the Western bloodstream can Jews paralyze white pride and agency, thereby making whites seek moral restitution by serving the 'holy' Other.
On a darker note, we see in both Geary and Taylor a rather servile attitude to the Ultimate Power. Geary, despite his cocky Waspiness, all-too-easily becomes a toady of the Corleones upon realizing the kind of power they wield. He used to look down on Eye-talians as greasy gangsters, but once fallen into their trap he grovels at their feet like an indentured servant. Likewise, Taylor is so impressed with Jewish Power that he clings to the hope that all-powerful Jews may one day appoint him as their most loyal Wasp servant. In some ways, Taylor is more pathetic than Geary on this point because whereas Geary is handsomely rewarded for sucking up to the Corleones, Taylor has gotten NOTHING from carrying water for the Jews and defending Israel. (Taylor supports Zionist treatment of Palestinians, but American Jews treat Taylor like Israelis treat Palestinians. What bittersweet irony.) Indeed, ADL that monitors Twitter got Tayor banned, and all the Jew-run media gleefully piled on the de-platformed Taylor and gloated like laughing hyenas. It's all well and good to be a gentleman, but this is war, and one must be willing to get down-and-dirty against the powers-that-be. In battle, even officers must be ready to get mud and blood on their uniforms. Taylor is too finely tailored for the coming battle, which is really a Race War waged by Jews against whites.
12. Matt Heimbach = Luca Brasi
Unlike Luca Brasi who seems rather dimwitted and tongue-tied in THE GODFATHER, Matt Heimbach is no dummy and gifted as a speaker. Of course, that hasn't prevented him from acting like a moron all too often. As the 'cowboy' says in MULHOLLAND DR., one's attitude goes a long way to decide how one's life will be, but then, one's attitude is largely shaped by one's personality. Heimbach is a monster-man like Brasi. Actually, if he lost some weight, he might look like a normal, even rather pleasant-looking, guy. But as fatso and bubblebutt, he looks grotesque, more Malt-Right than Alt-Right. The fact that he seems unable to shed a few pounds suggests a pitiable lack of self-control. He's like Cookie Monster. Also, despite his large body, he has a cherubic face, which he toughens with a beard, which only makes him look even more ridiculous in combo with nerdy glasses. So, there is Monster-Matt, someone who looks like a professional wrestler as couchpotato as baby-faced Paul Bunyan with specs of a computer nerd.
But what makes him especially like Brasi is the compulsion to associate himself with betters and the one-dimensionality of what he has to offer. Like Brasi the killer, Heimbach and his crew were only useful as street-fighters, the Fist of the Alt Right. Also, Heimbach was so eager to associate himself with someone like Spencer who is better-looking, better-educated, and better-mannered(at least in public). Brasi in THE GODFATHER is a self-loathing creature whose fanatical loyalty to Vito Corleone is founded on gratitude for having been offered friendship by a superior man. Even though Heimbach proudly defined himself as a Man of the White Working Class, the fact was the kind of people he dealt with tended to be crude and vulgar. Also, Heimbach got too close with Neo-Nazi stuff to ever gain respectability(or credibility among anti-Nazi Alt Right types). So, Heimbach's sole ticket to 'better optics' was to align himself with 'high-class' Spencer and serve as his Luca Brasi. But if Vito Corleone used Brasi in covert operations, Heimbach's overt actions for Spencer only served to tarnish the image of the 'superior' man.
At any rate, Heimbach now sleeps with the fishes because he can't recover from his Jerry-Springer-ish romp with his father-in-law Matt Parrot's wife. For a man who's berated the Jews for subverting Western Morality, it wasn't exactly the best move. Ironically, what Heimbach now has in common with Richard 'superior man' Spencer is Wife Problems. For all their public declarations for the White Family, they totally in affairs of personal and/or pubic life.
13. Ramzpaul = Johnny Fontane
As with most pairings on this blogpost, there is unfairness in comparing Ramzpaul with Fontane. Fontane is a corrupt and craven character who begs Don Corleone for favors to land a movie role. I can't imagine Ramzpaul stooping so low to get anything his way. He is classicly Waspy in sense of right-and-wrong, unlike the more clannish-minded folks of other tribes(non-whites and ethnic-whites, especially Jews and Italians). He's also shown considerable courage in sticking to his convictions despite media hostility. If he's gained in racial consciousness in recent yrs, it was with a certain reluctance in reaction to the changing political climate where non-whites are urged by Jews(especially) to blame everything on Whitey or White Privilege. Though individualist-libertarian by nature, he believes that whites have no choice but to be racially conscious because (1) they are headed toward minority status even in nations of their making and (2) PC dogma vilifies whites for all problems.
Now, why is he like Fontane? He is naturally entertaining and might have made it in comedy if he'd chosen another career path. He certainly enjoys the limelight and knows how to amuse his audience unlike most on the Alt Right who, as personalities, range from earnest to hotheaded. Another way he is like Fontane is a certain defeatism. His jokey personality, being most at home with cheerful lightheartedness, often succumbs to gloom-and-doom when pondering future prospects of the White Race. After all, no amount of joking can save a condemned man from the hangman. He admits he came close to quitting his Youtube stream several times and had to be slapped back into form by Tina the Finnish Godmother.
Ramzpaul doesn't have the vision and audacity of Spencer, and he has admitted he isn't the leader type. He's more a commentator and satirist. But overall, his view of the Alt Right has been saner than that of Spencer & Co. who decided to wage all sorts of internecine wars(mainly against Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents, which served NO purpose) and charge into radical acceleration mode in what was still a rickety and incomplete vehicle over bumpy roads. On a road strewn with so many obstacles and traps, Ramzpaul called for cautious and sober driving. Spencer decided to down the bottle and put the metal to the pedal... with rather predictable results.
14. Kevin MacDonald = Don Tommasino
Like Don Tommasino, Kevin MacDonald has been there from the beginning. A former radical socialist in the 1960s, he soon came to realize that Jewish Idealism is often wedded to a deeper Jewish Tribalism. If Wasps took the New Idealism at face value, Jews used it to maneuver themselves into power as the New Elites to not-so-covertly push their tribal supremacism uber alles. After much thought, MacDonald theorized that recent Jewish behavior is nothing new and, if anything, fits into a wider and deeper pattern of history, culture, and possibly genetics.
Because of his experience, he is weary and wounded warrior and has few illusions as to what the Power is really capable of. In this, he is different from the young crop of Alt Right crusaders who, in their gushy enthusiasm and naivete, hurled themselves into the fire like Siegfried... only to get scorched. Due to his age, MacDonald is in no position to lead the movement, and besides, he's more a scholar type than activist type. But like Don Tommasino, he has earned respect in the Alt Right community for key contributions and for having his paid his dues in the most suppressed movement in America.
15. Andrew Anglin = Fredo Corleone
Andrew Anglin isn't really part of Alt Right or any Right. He's essentially been a class-clown and troll all his life. Some say Daily Stormer is a Fed Operation run by Jewish Weez to make the Right look bad. While I don't subscribe to the notion of Anglin as agent, no good can come from taking him seriously. If Daily Stormer has any use, it's in the boundaries of free speech and mocking sacred cows of PC. Granted, its way of 'satire' is often so crude and ugly that it ends up soiling the Right as well muddying the Left.
That said, if the Alt Right had left Anglin to do his own thing, it would have been better for both sides. But, the Unite the Right Rally at Charlottesville invited the Anglin-Stormer crowd. Spencer had long public policy discussions with Anglin, as if Anglin could be taken seriously as an expert on anything. And Red Ice interviewed him as a person of importance. All bad moves. Class clowns are best handled like Adam Sandler. Laugh when they do funny stuff but do NOT invite to weddings and funerals.
Now, unlike Fredo, Anglin isn't exactly low-IQ. But when it comes to immaturity, he(and Weez) beats Fredo by a mile. There is something slightly endearing about Anglin and Weez when seen as bad-goy clowns and stooges but only revulsion when taken seriously. There's a reason why Michael Corleone limited Fredo to frivolous Mickey Mouse tasks. Fredo could not be trusted with serious responsibilities. You don't take Curly of the Three Stooges and put him in a War Movie or Serious Drama.
It’s often been said that alternative/independent/dissident voices on the Left and Right(especially on the Right as its seen as the #1 threat to Jewish Supremacist Power) are terribly hamstrung by being so outspent by Establishment Media, Academia, Think Tanks, and Deep State that are awash in $billions. This grievance is understandable, and the anxiety(and even fear) is not unfounded. After all, more money means more power. More power over elite institutions means more influence. More influence over politicians and other key figures means more control. Richard Spencer has complained of how an organization like the Heritage Foundations has hundreds of millions in endowments whereas NPI can hardly operate a payment system to collect small donations. And while SPLC and ADL are flush in cash, most dissident groups(especially those on the Right) just barely get by. Money means power, power means influence, influence means control. Most people are dummies, ignoramuses, suckers, or sheeple; most of their beliefs and credo relies on the conventional mills of indoctrination and outlets of information. Indeed, it’s interesting how most Journalism-Communication Schools have produced scribes, commissars, and court-informers than individuals committed to facts and truth. Of course, these journalists have been trained to believe that they are crusaders for justice, i.e. journalism isn’t only about information but transformation. But there is surely a difference between real justice and the Cult of Justice. Truth, in and of itself, is real justice as it is unjust to favor falsehood over truth. There may be rare exceptions, as with torture, which is usually wrong but may be justified in the most extreme cases. The film UNDER FIRE is exactly about that moral dilemma. Should the journalist report the fact that the rebel leader(an inspiration to so many people) is dead, or should he, like the Disciples of Jesus perhaps, concoct a hopeful myth of his being alive to resurrect the hopes of the masses struggling against tyranny? And surely, many people in journalism who knew the truth about Katyn Massacre went along with the official myth(that the Nazis than the Commies done it) to maintain the grand alliance against Evil Nazism. But while such lies-as-necessary-evil may be justified on rare occasions as 'noble lies', they become evil themselves when turned into a habitual practice to serve a Cultish Narrative of Justice that has little semblance with reality. For example, while communism had some justice on its side in the early stages of combating capitalism, imperialism, and reaction, once having gained power in several nations it turned into a mindless Cult of Justice where anything could be deemed ‘just’ on the basis of Marxist-Leninist dogma and anything could be deemed as ‘oppressive and exploitative’ because it was supposedly ‘capitalist’, ‘bourgeois’, or ‘fascist’(interpreted as the final culmination of capitalism; there is some truth in this Marxist interpretation of fascism; after all, both Jewish capitalists and Liberal Democrats have been consolidating their power through the rising might of Deep State that interconnects the various power centers of America: government, media conglomerate, military-industrial complex, Ivy League, intelligence services, law firms, vice industries, and etc; as such, people power has declined over the years while the power of oligarchs and elites have risen under both GOP and Democrats; this is crypto-globo-fascism that feigns 'freedom' and 'democracy' while using devious terms like 'diversity' and 'inclusion' to expand Jewish Supremacist Globo-Homo Imperialism all around the world; but then, where Marxists were wrong was in thinking that fascism is ONLY the culmination of the logic of capitalism; George Orwell knew better and understood that communism would also lead to fascism; history has shown that, in both China and Russia, communist-fascism eventually turns into oligarchic-capitalist fascism as the elites eventually decide to prioritize enriching themselves over taking care of the masses; Russia in the 1990s was an ultra-capitalist crypto-Zio-fascist state; everyone denounces fascism but moves toward fascism; everyone denounces fascism because it's too honest about the nature of power; everyone wants more power but pretend he is for something else, something 'nobler'; in contrast, True Fascists or National-Humanist-Neo-Fascists admit that politics, economics, and culture are about power, but as nationalists and humanists, they consciously strive to restrain this raw/naked powerism with larger concerns for the national good grounded in humanist sense of limits that reject hubris, the most fatal sin in power politics). So, even as communism became a maniacally repressive force in nation after nation, its scribes and commissars served the Power and executed policies & narrative that conformed to the Cult of Justice that had little to do with real justice that has to be based on facts, truth, honesty, and courage. At the very least, while early communists didn’t have all the facts and truth on their side, they at least had the virtue of courage and honesty of conviction. But once communism became the governing institution and ideology of several nations beginning with Russia, it even lost out on courage and honesty as it operated on the basis of fear, terror, intimidation, and mindless conformism. It turned into a system of tyrants, henchmen, and hacks & toadies.
The current Western World has many parallels with the Soviet Union. Of course, there are many more differences but the similarities are striking. The Current Order is like the early Soviet Union in the sheer preponderance of Jewish representation and power in elite circles. Just like the Russian Revolution was, at the very top, not very Russian, the current Western Order is more Jewish than genuinely Western, White, or Christian. Just like Jewish Bolsheviks used communism to erase nationalist identities and yearnings — Jews weren’t so much anti-Russian-imperialist as anti-Gentile-nationalist and, having taken over the Russian Empire, they were happily in neo-imperialist or socio-imperialist mode — , Jewish Globolshies use the cults of Homomania & Diversity(a form of Coercive Inclusion) to weaken and erase national identities & borders(except their own in Israel, of course). So, just as the ‘Russian Revolution’ wasn’t really Russian, the current ‘Western’ or ‘American’ Order isn’t really Western or American. It’s ruled by EOJ or the Empire of Judea. Globalism is a form of Jewish radicalism, this time capitalist than communist, and people like George Soros are the new Trotskys.
The current West/America is also like the later Soviet Union in the sense that the media, academia, and elite institutions have been so thoroughly taken over by PC, dogma, propaganda, and conformism. At the very least, the early Soviet period had allowed for some degree of dissent, argument, and experimentation. There was Trotsky vs Stalin vs other Bolsheviks. There were differing schools of art and representation. But eventually, one-size-fits-all dogma took hold of the Soviet Union, and the so-called Revolution turned into Resolution. It was as if all the questions were answered and all the differences had been hammered out. Thus, there was no more need for thinkers, writers, reporters, or artists to ever question the dogma of Central Command. Just do as told, say as told, and march along like good comrades. Thus, most things turned into hackwork(though there were exceptions). The current Western Order in academia, media, and state is rather similar. It’s filled with hackwork, hack-talk, and hack-cults by those who’d been raised and trained under hack-instructions. Today’s West combines the worst aspects of both early Bolshevik rule and late Soviet rule. It is ruled by nasty & vicious Jewish elites and run by total hacks without a smidgen of integrity or inspiration. At the very least, the early Soviet period, though ruthless and bloody, allowed for some lively dissent and firebrand controversy(even if only among the communists). And, at the very least, the late Soviet period, though dreary and moribund with inane hack-work all around, was free of Jewish-Zionist control. In contrast, the current West is not only ruled by nasty Jewish-Zionist globalist-supremacists but defined by the utterly mindless hack work of PC commissars made up of either venal Jews or stupid goyim(who’ve drunk the Jew-Globo Kool Aid).
Anyway, in terms of funding and connections, the comparison between Establishment & the Deep State on one side AND the Dissident Voices(especially on the alternative right) on the other is beyond Goliath vs David, even beyond elephant vs jackal, even beyond brontosaurus vs mouse. But size isn’t everything. After all, the venom of a snake can kill a creature much larger. The chemicals from a tiny poisonous frog can kill a human. A bacterial or viral infection can kill the largest beast even though bacteria and viruses are the smallest living creatures. And after the asteroid hit the Earth, it was the tiny mammals that survived to take over the world while the bigger and mightier dinosaurs faded into extinction. Could mammals have won out over the dinosaurs without the asteroid impact? Maybe, maybe not. But the fact is a major disruption(that altered the conditions of adaptation) came to favor one set of organism over another... even though, prior to the asteroid impact, few observers would have bet on tiny mammals inheriting the world. What the fall of dinosaurs and rise of mammals shows us that the Big Power isn’t always brought down by those who gain the power. There could be a Third Factor that seriously compromises the might of the Big Power and serves as catalyst to the events that finally bring it down totally. And then, once the Big Power falls, it may be a free-for-all until the new power arises. This has so often been the case in history. If it weren’t for Byzantine Empire and Persian Empire weakening each other through endless wars, there would have been far less chance for Arab Muslims to gain power over huge swaths of territory. And it would have been difficult for Bolsheviks to come to power if Russian Empire and German Empire hadn’t effectively destroyed one another, thus creating a huge vacuum to be filled by... something. And Mao’s ragtag army was sequestered in some far-flung northwest part of China and had zero chance of taking over China... until a war broke out between Japan and the KMT regime in China. In the end, the US and USSR destroyed Japan, and the KMT, severely weakened by the Japanese onslaught, lacked the means to re-consolidate control over China that fell to fanatical communist troops with high morale. This is why radicals and dissidents who are out-of-power should welcome(at least privately) hugely disruptive events that could very well weaken the support systems of the Big Power and opening up new possibilities to the other side.
Power comes in so many forms. Money can buy lots of things, but it can’t always buy love and respect. A rich white parent may spend lots of money to keep the trust of his children, but he may easily lose them to others who use different forms of influence. After all, why are there all those Romance stories where a woman leaves her rich hubby and runs off with someone else? The hubby may have the cash, but the other guy may have the looks, the charm, the style. A woman can be seduced and taken by a dashing rascal from a rich husband who has the money but no charm. Similarly, even if a white man may have a big house, fancy stuff, and lots of money, his kids can come under the influence of others with much less. Suppose the kids go to college and take a course taught by some radical Jewish professor. The Jew cannot buy the kids but he can infect their minds with an idea that can grow inside their heads like the pod-plants in INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS. Or, suppose the kids come to love black music. So, even though their dad is much richer than some bluesman or reggae singer, the kids can feel that they have more in common in soulfulness with Negroes than with their rich father. Money can buy lots of things but not affection, love, loyalty, or respect. Indeed, connections based on money end when the money dries up. This is what Michael Corleone understands in THE GODFATHER PART 2. In the end, everyone in the mafia game is a ‘businessman’, and their loyalty is based on money. And even within the family, loyalty and trust can be lost due to factors other than money. After all, Fredo didn’t turn on Michael out of money. It was due to 'respect'. He felt belittled by his younger brother as the head of the Family, and he wanted something for himself to gain some 'respect'. And even though Kay never had to worry about money, she turned on Michael out of her Anglo-American conscience that had just about enough of the 1000 Yr Sicilian Thing. Kay killed the kid.
And even though Jews are immensely rich now, they weren’t always so favorably positioned in American Elite Circles. If money is the ultimate power and begets more money, then Wasps would not have lost what their ancestors had founded and built to Jewish climbers. After all, there was a time when Wasps were far richer and more powerful than Jews. That having been the case, Wasps should have grown richer and richer and more powerful; they should have outpaced Jews indefinitely. But at some point, new generations of Wasps lost their pride & confidence and did little to resist the Rise of Jewish Power. If anything, many were fully onboard in aiding Jewish Power to grow even faster and bigger. They either became intellectual and ideological servants of Jews or figured they had to jump ship to the Jewish Side if they are to remain afloat.
Paradoxically perhaps, one crucial disadvantage of Wasps or Anglo-Americans derived from none other than their long-standing advantage. They had a stronger sense of form, manners, duty, and structure than most peoples. Even though Anglo-Americans became looser in the US, they(especially around New England, once the cultural capital of the US) retained much of the culture of form and manners of the British. This provided the Anglo-world with discipline, work ethic, and moderation, but it also made things a bit cold and rigid. So, for many children of Wasps who went to colleges or hung around swankier parts of big cities, there was allure in Jewish intellectualism or Negro music. Anglos had the form but not the fire. Jewish Thought was more fiery because Jews were wilier and looser in personality, like the Marx Brothers. And Negro culture flowed from energies in the dongs and booties. It offered heat to Anglo frigidity. (The term 'coal-burning' gives credence to this phenom of Anglos turning into Junglos.) So, the white ass that had been trained to be straight and narrow begin to go jiggity-wiggity in the Jazz Age. It just goes to show that even people with relative disadvantage in wealth and connections exert great power by other means(that eventually lead to money power as well; consider Jewish domination of news & Hollywood, and consider Negroes raking in billions with rap music). So many Anglo-American kids sent to elite colleges by rich parents ended up being mind-infected by Jewish radical professors. It also happened to many kids raised by staunch conservatives. Once their minds were infected with radical Jewish intellectual ideas, they began to see their parents as ‘racist’ and ‘bigoted’.
And there was also the power of Hollywood. Granted, the Movie Industry was about money. Jews who ran Hollywood were primarily after profits. But movies they produced also created new objects of Idol-worship, and this had a neo-pagan impact on the entire world in terms of which figures and symbols came to be worshiped. Idolatry & Money is far more powerful than mere Money is. Indeed, Idolatry & Million Dollars can win over Billion Dollars minus Idolatry. The power of money can buy lots of loyalty. But the loyalty depends on cash flow. Once the flow stops, loyalty vanishes into the air. Someone who works hard for Microsoft will turn against it if he can make more at Facebook or Google. It’s all about the Money. In contrast, Idolatry or Iconography clings to the person who is ‘infected’ with its fever or aura. If a Jew keeps handing you $100 bills, you will serve him as long as he keeps giving you the dough. Once the money stops, you no longer care to serve him. It’s like taking tips. You only care about the money. But suppose a Jew doesn’t give you money but shows you a movie with a Mountain-Sized-Negro-Who-Loves-a-Little-White-Mouse and is supposed to be like a negrovah(Negro-as-jehovah) and black jesus rolled into one. Or suppose the Jew shows you TV ads or music videos in which white women are especially attracted to Negro men as the new idol-studs of manhood. The image may become ‘incepted’ into your mind, and you may henceforth worship the Negro as a holy creature or ‘badass’ hero no matter where you live and work, no matter with whom you are with. And you may even impart this sham-iconography of the sacro-negro or electro-ultra-‘nigga’ to your own kids as the essence of what ‘Western Culture’ and ‘Western Values’ are all about. This is why religious power has been so resilient. Even though Romans whupped the Jews and crushed the early Christians, the spiritual power of Jews outlasted the Romans, and the spiritual creed of early Christians came to infect the minds of Roman elites who eventually spread it far and wide for all subjects of the Empire.
At any rate, there is the question of What-Is-To-Be-Done in the Dissident Right, the Alt Right, and the Left-Right. After all, the most censored, marginalized, denounced, and persecuted movement in the West is that of the Dissident Right(smeared as ‘far right’ by Jew-run media). Even though the Real Left is also out of power, it is still allowed to have its niches in the academia. Even though Marxists and Leninists have zero power in government, economy, and culture, they are allowed to do their thing in the academia. No professor or student will be hounded from the academia for still clinging to Marxism, even of the Stalinist or Maoist kind. And even though globalism has no use for men like Noam Chomsky, they hold vaunted positions in the academia and are sometimes invited to speak in highly respected institutions(without crazed students and antifa disrupting events). And among the bottom-feeders, Antifa goons are allowed to run riot with minimal consequences. We saw from what happened at Charlottesville that elements of the Far Left are allowed far greater leeway to do as they please. Indeed, they are even enabled by the Establishment to serve as neo-Janissary goons against the Dissident Right and Alt Right(though to be sure, certain elements of the Dissident/Alt Right are too close for comfort with Neo-Nazi types). So, the Dissident Right would seem to be the most powerless and disadvantaged voice in the West. And it is worse in Canada, where Dissident Rightist views are effectively outlawed. And in the EU, people could very well end up in prison for saying what the Dissident Right says in the US. In the US, they take away your payment system, get you fired from work — so much for "no discrimination based on race, color, or creed" — , intimidate you with ‘lawfare’, and get you attacked in the street by Antifa thugs. But they can’t throw you in prison just for expressing an idea.
That being the case, ‘what is to be done?’, we ask. This is not an easy question to answer, but we should start with the fact that, in the Current Year, the Lies are expensive whereas the Truth is free. American Renaissance made just this point about itself in relation to SPLC. American Renaissance is a modest operation that runs on a small budget. Most people are afraid to donate to it because they can lose jobs, privilege, and wealth IF it’s exposed that they donated even $20 to a man like Jared Taylor. (In contrast, even the most murderous Judeo-Nazi Zionist Imperialist can donate millions to any ultra-Jewish-supremacist organization and suffer no consequences; if anything, he will likely be praised by both parties and ass-kissed by the Deep State.) Also, the Jews who run the payment systems have denied service to American Renaissance, making it difficult for the Dissident Right to raise money. In contrast, Jews can donate as much as they want to Zionist-Imperialist organizations like ADL and Jewish-Supremacist organizations like AIPAC. Never mind Zionists are killing Palestinians in Gaza. Never mind World Jewry recruited Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to pull off a coup against a democratically elected government. Never mind Israel illegally shoots missiles into Syria and has given support to ISIS Death Squads that have carried out horrendous atrocities against Christian Arabs. Jews can get away with donating to Judeo-Nazi organizations because they control the Media, the State, and the court of public opinion. Therefor, while there is great stigma in being associated with a ‘white supremacist’ like Jared Taylor, there is no shame in pouring tons of money into Jewish-Supremacist mass-killers and lunatics. As Jews control the media, Jewish Supremacism is simply called ‘support for Israel, our greatest ally’. Such slogans have been drilled into our heads so many times that we echo them without thinking... like how the men in MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE mindless repeat a certain line without reflection:
Still, consider the fact that, despite its lavish funding, SPLC's website hardly gets more visits than American Renaissance that operates on a shoestring budget: AmRen vs. SPLChttps://www.amren.com/news/2016/08/amren-vs-splc/ And despite its huge cash-pile, I highly doubt if anyone gives a crap about what Heritage Foundation is saying either. If anything, Heritage Foundation isn’t really about honest discussion of Conservative Ideas as about taking money from donors to mold the new crop of would-be ‘conservatives’ into hacks and toadies of the Establishment. It doesn’t invite people to offer fresh ideas but to either consent to the status quo or sell out their core conservative principles to serve the New Normal, such as ‘Gay Marriage is about family values’ or ‘Israel did nothing wrong even when aiding ISIS death squads against Christian Arabs’.
Same goes for AIPAC. Does anyone really believe anything said at AIPAC conferences? Does anyone join AIPAC or attend any of its seminars to learn anything real about Israel? Of course not. People join AIPAC for the same reason why most people now join the military: Career Opportunity. Since Jew Inc. pays well, people try to join AIPAC to get a foothold into the world of Power and Privilege. If Jews were dirt poor whereas Arab-Americans were the super-rich overlords of the US, I suspect many more people would be joining pro-Arab organizations. The fact that AIPAC is about power than the truth has been made plain-as-day by AIPAC organizers themselves. They openly admit that they are only interested in people with elevated credentials. It’s smart thinking from the viewpoint of power because the crucial power of any functioning society resides at the top. AIPAC doesn’t bother with persuading or recruiting community college students or people with high-school degrees. It looks for those who attended the better kinds of schools. In this, AIPAC is like any corporation or organization that seeks talent. The problem with this approach for an organization like AIPAC is that it claims to stand for truth and justice about Israel. But if AIPAC is all about using money to win over talent to shill for Israel, what does it have to do with truth or justice? At the very least, people who sell soda pop or cosmetics don’t pretend their products have moral value. In contrast, AIPAC pretends to sell a moral argument as it scouts around for more non-Jewish shills to serve the cause of Judeo-Nazism. Because it is such a sham, even those who sign on must realize, at some point, that they are just dirty shameless whores of Zion. Then, as their cynicism grows, they realize that the ONLY reason for continuing to sing to the AIPAC tune is for the money. This seems like a great advantage to AIPAC as Jews got more money than they can spend, but it’s also a disadvantage because there is no real love for or trust in AIPAC. It’s just a Pimp Operation that runs a stable of whores who just do it for the money.
The Mass Media, organizations like AIPAC, Deep State institutions like CIA-NSA-FBI, and PC-fearful academia have lots of money, but they are selling a Lie, not least because Jews rule the West and fear the truth lest their perfidious role be exposed for all to see. So, Jews need to keep pushing the Lie, but people are generally not willing to tell lies unless they are paid to do so or forced to do so. When forced to do so, they go along but feel resentment. When paid to do so, they feel cynical and no real conviction to the crap they have to spout off ever so often. Sure, out of sheer desperation, some of these agents of PC pretend to sincerely believe in the nonsense they are peddling, but the effect is emotionally draining, personally embarrassing, or ultimately maddening. It’s like the Claude Rains character lies and lies in MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON but feels sick about it at the end.
Sure, the PC has been coded so that anyone who defies Jewish Supremacism and rejects White Submissivism is tagged with ‘hate’ and ‘far right’, whereas anyone who sucks up to Judeo-Nazi supremacists who wage Wars for Israel and gun down innocent Palestinians is praised as being on the side of angels. Also, PC has idolized Jews, Homos, and blacks as the Holy Three. For all its BS about equality, PC favors Jews over Palestinians, blacks over non-blacks(except Jews and Homos), and Homos over real-sexuals. Indeed, PC says the term ‘pride’ is now synonymous with homo fecal penetration. So, PC isn’t about right vs wrong. It’s not about good or bad. It’s about mindless and servile worship of certain groups who are deemed so iconographically holy that they are right even when wrong. And those who displease these groups are wrong even when they are right. That’s how PC morality works. It’s about morality-by-identity or grace-by-face. If you have the right ID, you’re always right. If you have the wrong ID, you’re always wrong.
The Establishment has tremendous power and wealth to push this PC, but utterly absurd nonsense cannot sustain itself indefinitely. It can only continue with the support of massive funding, endless promotion, and non-stop hyperbole and rapture. The Lie is effective only as a very expensive and elaborate lie. And that is the Achilles' Heel of the Power. As their prestige is based on the Lie, they must spend immense sums and use all sorts of tricks to persuade the elites and fool the masses.
In contrast, the Truth is free. It costs nothing. All it takes is to see reality, process reality, and speak honestly about reality. Granted, the truth may be costly in robbing you of friends, career, and payment systems. Still, it doesn’t cost anything to speak the Truth, especially in the internet age. In contrast, it costs plenty to sell the Lie. Also, when truth-tellers are punished for speaking the truth that more and more people wake up to, it becomes ever more difficult and expensive for the Power to perpetuate the Lie with yet more money and manipulation. The law of diminishing returns sets in. Money can buy a lot of things, but everything has limits. Indeed, we saw this in the GOP primaries in 2016. Jeb Bush was the favored candidate with the Republican Establishment, and he started the campaign with the biggest war chest. But no matter how much his BS was pushed by the Power, it went nowhere because the Base just about had enough of listening to the globalist cuckservatives who’d done nothing but sell the US down the river while those on the top got theirs from the Globo-Homo trough.
Because, against the power of the Expensive Lie, the Free Truth is the most potent and effective weapon for those without the power, it is absolutely important for the truth-tellers to stick to the truth. They must keep with integrity, honesty, and courage. One thing they may NOT do is counter the Big Lie with more lies. This is where the Alt Right went terribly wrong in associating with 14/88 and Neo-Nazi types who are filled with lies of their own. Even as they attack Jewish Supremacism and PC distortion of history, they spout nonsense about ‘Hitler did nothing wrong’ or ‘Holocaust didn’t happen’ and other tripe.
Indeed, there is nothing dumber than the Free Lie. At the very least, the Expensive Lie has the means to fool enough people via media monopoly and manipulation. In contrast, the Free Lie or the Cheap Lie doesn’t even have the means to convince anyone. For those without the power, their best bet for winning hearts and minds is with the Free Truth. While Truth may be off-putting and offensive to those accustomed to PC, when articulated clearly, sensibly, rationally, and factually, it has the power to win over more and more people. As Free Truth lacks the power of fireworks, it can only offer the fire. And the fire, if good and real, has the power to gradually spread far and wide. In contrast, the Big Lie must rely on endless displays of fireworks that may look impressive but don’t amount to a plate of beans. The media and deep state spent tremendous sums to push the Russia-Hacking Narrative. But fewer and fewer people are buying it.
In the story of the EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES, the emperor has huge sums to fool the masses into thinking that he’s clothed in wonderful new material. It’s all about the Expensive Lie. In contrast, the boy offers the Free Truth. The boy’s observation is shocking and off-putting to many at first, but gradually people begin to catch on. We are so enthralled with power and status that, too often, we tend to trust Establishment sources as the authoritative voice of the truth. Also, especially because the 20th century witnessed the conflict between Liberal Democracies and totalitarian regimes of both the Far Right and Far Left, we are prone to think that we are living in a world of freedom and truth. After all, the Liberal West defeated both the Far Right and the Far Left that were tyrannical and repressive. Now, it was true enough that there was more freedom and truth in liberal democracies than in Nazi Germany and Soviet Union, BUT that doesn’t mean Liberal Democracies are fundamentally free or honest. It only means they are freer and more honest compared to radical orders. A habitual liar is more honest than a compulsive liar, but he is still a liar. (The great Jewish accomplishment in Liberal Democracies since the end of the Cold War was in turning democracies almost as repressive and deceitful as totalitarian regimes of old. Jews may gain in the short-term but may well lose out in the long-term, not least because their hypocrisies are becoming so obvious. The very Jews who ranted endlessly about the Red Scare are now throwing tantrums about the totally fictional Russia Hacking fantasy. At least the Red Scare was grounded in reality as there had been many Soviet agents in the US government. But many radicals in the 40s and 50s were Jews, so the Jewish Narrative made anti-communists the bad guys. But now that Jews hate Russia, even the most ridiculous paranoia about Russia is fair game 24/7 via the Jew-run media.) So, the End of History with triumph of Liberal World Order isn’t necessarily a victory of freedom and honesty. It only opened the way for the Endgame of History. Also, if indeed the Grand History of the Battle of Ideas came to an end with the collapse of the Soviet Union, then it means the new terms of Global Conflict are about something else than 'ideas'. What? The fundamental truth of the Global World Order in the Current Year is that it’s about the Empire of Judea(EOJ) against all of humanity that are pitted against one another so that Jews can play divide and rule over all of humanity.
For the Dissident Right, there is the power of Free Truth, which is effective because the Internet has been the great equalizer. A successful youtube vlogger can have wider reach than a columnist for NYT or the Washington Post. He may lack the august credentials bestowed by the Ivies or the Deep State, but he has truth, courage, and honesty on his side. He may not be correct about everything, but at least he is speaking without fear or favor, which is impossible in the Big Media, Academia, Deep State, and etc. where even a slightly 'insensitive' remark about homo neo-aristos can land one in hot water.
Of course, the Powers-that-be know and fear this about the Internet. That's why it is so important for Jews that they have ethno-monopoly or Ziopoly over financial instruments and platforms so that when, push comes to shove, they can shut down everyone. And many people have been taken off Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube by Jews. Colin Flaherty who unflinchingly exposed the truth about black criminality has been banned from Youtube. He is now on Minds.com, though Google Search tries to hide the site: https://www.minds.com/ColinFlaherty
Palestinian freedom fighters have been taken off Facebook. But the thing is Judeo-Nazis cannot shut down everyone. And every time they shut someone down, more people realize WHO HAS THE REAL POWER as the word gets out that JEWS SHUT DOWN ANOTHER VOICE. Indeed, many people have now come to associate ADL with censorship. They know that SPLC is a Jew-funded Hate Group that goes after anyone who stands against the Zio-Globo-Homo agenda.
Dissident Rightists and Palestinian Freedom Fighters can be creative. Consider how Alt Right voices are not welcome in colleges. But, Alt Right figures can make speeches to colleges online. They don't have to actually visit a college. For instance, Richard Spencer can announce that he will give a speech to Harvard. It doesn't matter if Harvard won't invite him. He can put his Speech-to-Harvard on one of many video platforms. And then, he can target another college for a 'guerrilla tour'. After all, Jews didn't change America by going from town to town, door to door, like Jewish peddlers of old. Jews just gained control of media and beamed their electronic signals to TV's in every home. Free Truth is the most potent weapon in the Internet Age against Expensive Lie. Just be sure not to speak the Free Lie.
