We have seen how the material political power of Islam declined very rapidly during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Did it decline or fail to keep up with the West? Maybe the Muslim remained where it was while the West advanced technologically. If someone stands still while you walk forward, he's not moving backward even though he will increasingly fall back behind you.
Hilaire Belloc:
Cultures spring from religions; ultimately the vital force which maintains any culture is its philosophy, its attitude toward the universe; the decay of a religion involves the decay of the culture corresponding to it – we see that most clearly in the breakdown of Christendom today. The bad work begun at the Reformation is bearing its final fruit in the dissolution of our ancestral doctrines – the very structure of our society is dissolving.
But the real benefit of Christianity was not that Western culture sprung from it but that the culture had something to fall back on when things went south. Christian moralism has stood in the way of cultural inspiration and creativity. Even though Renaissance artists created many religious works, the true spark and inspiration were neo-pagan. But paganism has a way of becoming decadent, nihilistic, and idolatrous, a narcissism of power and beauty. Christianity provided some balance to such tendencies. The main creative source of Western Civilization is Greco-Roman and even Germanic imaginations. But creativity isn't necessarily moral; it is also elitist and belongs to a few. As such, it can't for long serve as the basis of a stable civilization. Morality must be the core values of a people, and that is where Christianity proved most valuable. Not because culture sprung from it — Western Civilization was already great and accomplished before its conversion to Christianity. As for the Reformation, it was a response to the corruption and decay of the Catholic Church that came to overly rely on rituals and idols than on creed and conviction. For awhile, Reformation restored Christian passion.
Hilaire Belloc:
In the place of the old Christian enthusiasms of Europe there came, for a time, the enthusiasm for nationality, the religion of patriotism. But self-worship is not enough, and the forces which are making for the destruction of our culture, notably the Jewish Communist propaganda from Moscow, have a likelier future before them than our old-fashioned patriotism.
But patriotism is not about self-worship. It's not about worship at all. It's about pride and preservation of heritage. It is not a religion in and of itself. Also, spirituality can be made a part of patriotism and nationalism. This is most evident in Judaism and its Covenant that fuses tribalism with spiritualism. In a similar vein, Christianity can be made part of national heritage, i.e. while Christianity is for all the world, each people can stress their own story of how they came to the Faith, and that particularity within universality should have been stressed. Consider the Russian Orthodox Church. It is Christian and Nationalist. Likewise, Buddhism has a nationalist element among Tibetans, Vietnamese, Burmese, and etc.
In the end, Jewish capitalism turned out to be far more damaging to Western Man. Though Jews were heavily involved in communism, its triumph came to suppress Jewish power that relies on individual enterprise, tribal networking, and meritocracy to realize its full potential. In all communist nations, the Jews eventually lost out to the non-Jewish majority as communism is about The People and Mass Mediocrity.
The reason why nationalism came more naturally to Europeans is because European societies developed from agriculture. In contrast, Arabs were nomadic and generally didn't put down roots in any part of the desert. They were movers, traders, and raiders. Of course, in time, Nationalism began to fade among Europeans with increasing urbanization and globalism that made it easy for Europeans to move abroad and for non-Europeans to move into Europe. Nomadism is intrinsic to globalism. Wings rule over the feet.
Steve Sailer:
History often turns upon unexpected personalities. The West has been fairly lucky that no outstanding man has arisen in Islamic world. Since 1936, probably the two most remarkable personalities have been Nasser, who was more of a Bonapartist modernizer demagogue than an Islamist, and the Ayatollah Khomeini.
This may be true of past history when Muslims had a chance of literally conquering the West like the Mongols also nearly did. But in the modern era, why would the emergence of a great Muslim leader be bad for the West? Did Ayatollah call for invasion of the West? No, all the stuff about 'great satan' was mostly rhetorical. Kemal Ataturk wanted peace with the West and Westernization for Turks.
The main reason why Gamal Nasser and other notable Arab/Muslim leaders lost out is because Jews gained power in the West and used West as a proxy against the Arab/Muslim World. Israel was a Western creation of Jews and whites who supported, defended, and supplied Zionism at every turn.
The West, under Jewish Power, also crushed Saddam Hussein who, though a horrid person, did much to modernize Iraq. Living standards for most Iraqis were pretty decent prior to the Gulf War.
For all the problems among Arabs, their societies would be far more accomplished if not for Jewish control of the West and use of Western power as proxy of Jewish agenda. Iraq today would be formidable if not for the Gulf War, semi-genocidal sanctions, and the invasion. Iraq was also building nuclear power plants before they were bombed by Israeli jets with US support. Syria would be in much better straits if not for Neocon agenda of sending and aiding terrorists. Gaddafi made real gains in Libya before Jewish-ruled West destroyed it. And Iranian economy would be much stronger if not for sanctions forced by Jewish-controlled US. If it came down to Jews vs Muslims, Jews would not necessarily win even though, pound for pound, they are smarter than Arabs/Muslims. The real secret to Israel's success and Muslim world's failure is that the Jews control the West that does the bidding of Zion. But suppose a Muslim-controlled West sanctioned Israel for its war crimes and dropped bombs to kill Israel leaders and figures. Where would Israel be?
If white people have decided to relinquish their ownership of America, who shall the United States belong to? By historical rights, the United States should be a White Nation. While, in the 'spiritual' sense, we can acknowledge that the American Indians have had the deepest and most special connection to the land — as they've been here for many eons prior to the arrival of peoples from the Old World — , the nation that came to be known as the 'United States' or 'America' is almost entirely the creation of the Anglo-Germanic founder and settlers. Even acknowledging the key role of black labor in the development of Early America, it was the vision, skills, rules, values, and the culture of whites that made possible the rise of a nation that wasn't only distinct from those of the Old World but those of Mexico, Central America, and South America, the so-called parts of Latin America. The simple fact is No Whites(Anglo-Americans and Anglo-Europeans[non-Anglos who became Anglo-ized as white immigrants in the US]), No America. America as a modern nation is simply inconceivable without white Europeans, especially those of Anglo(and Dutch, Irish, and Germanic)stock who laid down the foundations and supplied the labor guided by Protestant Work Ethic(that, in time, came to affect the Catholic Irish as well). Only a moron or liar would dispute the historical fact of No Whites, No America.
Granted, it's likely another kind of nation might have arisen in North America if it hadn't been for the Anglos(and Germanics, Irish, and Dutch). If Anglos had kept out of the New World, the French might have settled North America and built an impressive Franco-American civilization. Or if the French had also kept out of the Americas, perhaps most of North America would eventually have been settled by Russians from the Northwest(via Alaska) and by Spanish from the South. Or, if the Chinese and Japanese had been more adventurous across the seas, they might have settled parts of the West Coast. Those are all maybes, but what actually did happen is that the Anglos and the Germanics(that would include the Dutch and Scandinavians along with Germans), two of the most accomplished and talented peoples on Earth(apart from the French) at the time, managed to settle most of North America and in time gained overwhelming preeminence over it. As such, the main credit for the creation and development is with them. But, it is true enough that the land was taken from the indigenous natives who, though wild and savage, were proud warrior folks with deep and even 'sacred' connection to the land. Also, as Northern Europeans couldn't produce enough babies fast enough(and in time, birthrates would precipitously fall among their kinds) to settle the vast territories of North America, the American colonies brought over black slaves. And then, to put down railroads and man the factories, the US let in lots of immigrants from other parts of Europe, south and east. Blacks would long remain a problem, not so much because of the color of their skin but because they're naturally stronger, tougher, more aggressive, and more pathological(as well as having lower IQ, but then it is a good thing that blacks have lower IQ because black psychopathy + black thuggery + high black IQ would have led to even more problems; the last thing we need is blacks with the IQ of Jews as well as the muscles of simians; after all, animals are stronger than humans but dumber, and only a fool would wish gorillas, lions, and bears were as smart or smarter than humans as humans would be threatened not only physically but intellectually by the beasts). Chinese arrived to work on railroads, but their number was limited, not least because of immigration restrictive laws that came to regard mass Asian immigration as 'yellow peril'. (White Americans feared mass yellow immigration like Palestinians feared mass Jewish immigration. Back then, white Americans were able to stem the yellow tide from Japan and China, the most populous nation on Earth, whereas Palestinians weren't able to put a stop to the Zionist tide that eventually overran the Arab population. Today, Jews in Israel are able to prevent the Right of Return by Palestinians, but white Americans aren't able to do much about the endless non-white immigration that threatens to reduce whites to a minority in the very nation they founded and built.)
As for non-Anglo and non-Germanic immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, they proved to be white enough. Most Eastern Europeans, especially Central European Slavs, were almost as pale-faced as the Anglos and Germanics. Southern Europeans, in contrast, especially from places like Southern Italy and Greece, were swarthier and less white, but they were still white enough to gradually and eventually assimilate into Anglo-America. Also, despite their fallen status in modern times, Greeks and Italians had tremendous cultural capital as Western Civilization would have been inconceivable without Hellenic and Latin roots. In a way, the United States was like a final culmination of what really began in the democracy of Athens and evolved in the republics of Rome. Even though the once barbarian-northern Europeans grew to greatness whereas the once advanced-southern Europeans fell on hard times, there was a deep historical and cultural connection between them. In time, even Southern-European Americans became more-or-less Anglo-ized and in effect became Anglo-Europeans of the New World. Also, as Southern European Americans were outnumbered by Northern-European Americans, the majority of them were mindful to fit in with the Northern-European-American models of behavior, manners, and work. Thus, they soaked up aspects of the Northern Protestant Work Ethic, something that was absent in Latin America where, in most cases, Southern European Latinos set the template for majority populations that were Mestizo and/or Indio. Despite Italian-American criminality, most groups that arrived in the US came to admire the vision and achievements of Anglo-Germanic Americans and sought to be a 'credit to their race' by living up to the American Model as forged by the Founders and Settlers.
And the fate of America might have been a happy or happier story if not for the fact that many of those 'Eastern Europeans' were actually Semites, the Jews who arrived with a different mentality and attitude. Even as the poor immigrants from places like Poland, Italy, Russia, and etc. were grateful to start anew in America, they still fondly harked back to their nations of origins as spiritual homelands. They appreciated the freedoms and opportunities in America, but there remained a sentimentality and nostalgia for the nations from which they came. They'd left for America out of ambition, not out of hatred for their own nations and peoples. They may have been disgruntled by the poverty and backwardness of their nations of origin, but they still felt attachment to their old homelands, and many of them tried to recreate the Old World in the New World, as in German-towns and Polish-towns. In contrast, many Jews left Old World Europe for New World America with something bordering on real hatred. Whereas most white Americans felt, "Even if nothing works out here in the New World, there is my homeland in the Old World, the one I might return to", the Jews came to the US with a "Don't Look Back" attitude. It was the attitude of the ancients leaving Sodom or Egypt. They weren't leaving their homeland but the land of hostile strangers. While many Irish-Americans were haunted by bitter memories/stories about poverty-stricken Ireland, it was still their beloved homeland. In contrast, Jews never felt that way about Poland or Russia. John Ford made THE QUIET MAN as tribute to lovely green Eire, but the typical Jewish movie about the Old World was something like FIDDLER ON THE ROOF. (Even the Coen Brothers are more sentimental about the Irish in MILLER'S CROSSING than about Jews in their other films. Because the Irish have a homeland, they feel home away from home. Even when things go badly for them in America or elsewhere, they can at least say, "There is a place called Ireland where MY PEOPLE live" and hum to "Danny Boy". It's the difference between Steve Martin and John Candy in PLANES, TRAINS, AND AUTOMOBILES. Even when everything goes wrong, Martin's character knows he has a home and family that waits for him whereas Candy's character is forever a wanderer with no place to call home, no place to return to. THE SWIMMER is ultimately tragic because Burt Lancaster's character no longer has a home, unlike Odysseus who still had a loyal wife and son waiting for him. The Irish in MILLER'S CROSSING feel at home even away from home because they know Ireland exists even if far away. In contrast, the Jews seem more restless in MILLER'S CROSSING and BARTON FINK, especially as the stories take place in a time prior to the creation of Israel. Having a homeland can even sweeten the worst tragedies. Irish remember the Potato Famine with great angst, but they still love the land on which their ancestors perished. In contrast, Jews feel no such attachment to the killing fields of Eastern Europe upon which Nazis and their collaborators mowed down countless Jews.) And this is why Jews became especially covetous of the United States. If most white groups felt that they still had a dear homeland to return to(or dream about) even if nothing good came of them in the New World, Jews felt they better make it in the New World because they could never feel truly at home in the Old World, especially as the rise of modern nationalism made things difficult for Jews who were regarded by various ethno-national groups as parasitic and rootless.
Jews appreciated the blank-slate aspect of America, the idea that it was a land where arrivals could start anew without the old baggage. It was like a criminal having his past history wiped clean off the record. The hope was that Jews would be regarded merely as fellow Americans and free individuals without the deep-rooted prejudices of the Old World. And yet, Jews were bound to be problematic because, even as they were excited by the blank-slate aspects of Americanism(whereby anyone or at least any white person could become 'American' and judged on the basis of meritocracy than identity), they insisted on clinging to their ancient identity, heritage, and even hatreds. Even as Jews were relieved that America was less 'antisemitic' than the Old World, they remained nasty, hostile,and contemptuous toward the goy population, often animated by bitterness, resentment, and envy.
Furthermore, Anglo-Americans had contradictory reasons of their own for having welcomed in all those Jews. On the one hand, it was that very ancient pedigree of Jews that made Anglo-Americans romanticize them(in the way that bohemian types romanticized Gypsies and the way that Counterculture types in the Sixties romanticized the Hindus and Eastern Mysticism). Especially because America broke free from the British Empire, there developed the conceit of a New Civilization. In fact, United States was essentially a continuation of British(and Germanic) Civilization, but the narrative of Independence & clean break from the Old World made Americans eager to gain cultural credentials. Without the myth of 1776, the American colonies(remaining part of the British Empire) would have regarded themselves as continuous in terms of history and heritage in its loyalty and connection to the Motherland of England. But 1776 became for America what Anno Domini was for Christianity. The vision of a New Beginning.
Never mind that Christianity grew out of Judaism and that America grew out of Britain. To validate the New Idea or New Nation as legitimate and even superior, the break had to be emphasized over the continuation. But this was easier said than done as America, in contrast to Old World Europe, was indeed 'shallow' in history and culture. It couldn't boast of Athens, Renaissance, Shakespeare, or Mozart. Also, many white goy immigrants who came to the New World came without much culture or learning. Many were barely literate and were hardly in a position to contribute much to the development of American Culture. They came mainly to supply manpower to build a new nation by working on farms and factories. But Jews were different. They were more educated, more literate and cultured. Also, more of them were involved with ideas, philosophy, and history. Thus, Anglo-Americans came to appreciate Jews as the instant-bringers of Culture/Heritage to America. Paradoxically, precisely because of America's conceit of rupture from the Old World, it craved something of depth and heritage. It's like a man who breaks free from home may exult in newfound freedom but soon finds himself hankering desperately for a new sense of home. (Replicants in BLADE RUNNER are psychologically unstable because they have no sense of past, no prior memories.) As America broke with Old Britain, it sought cultural sustenance in connection to something with even deeper pedigree. No people were as ancient as the Jews.
In a way, this was rather ironic because the US was to Britain what Christianity was to Judaism. And yet, the very enterprising, adaptive, and venturesome ways of the Jews struck a chord with Anglo-Americans who entertained the Ideal of the New Jew. The idea was that Jewishness had been perverted and distorted in the Old World because of repressions and prejudices, but the New Jews of America would become wonderful Good Americans in the open and healthy air of freedom and liberty. (And Jews flattered Anglo-Americans for harboring just such delusional sentiments about Jews. Much later, American Conservatism would similarly romanticize the Neocons as Jews who would finally see the light and become Good Americans via baptism by Conservatism Inc. In fact, Jews cynically toyed with naive Conservative minds to take over the movement to push Jewish Supremacism in cahoots with Jewish 'Liberals'.)
Another reason why Anglo-Americans developed a certain feeling for Jews had to do with the rootless nature of Americanism. After all, if the vast continent had to be settled, it wouldn't do for too many Americans to put down roots in any one place. They had to keep moving, especially Westward to take land from the Indians and even Mexicans. Thus, unlike Greekness or Polishness, Americanism wasn't defined by vertical roots but horizontal movement. Thus, Americanism had to be defined in a portable manner. One wasn't American because he was tied to a particular territory in the New World but because of the portable bag of ideas he carried within his heart and mind at all times. So, even if he left Pennsylvania for Ohio and then for Iowa and then for Idaho and then for Oregon, he was an American because what really defined him was the Narrative, Outlook, and the Constitution.
In a similar way, the Jews, especially following the great Exile from Jerusalem, survived as identity and culture in the Diaspora because Jewishness came to be identified with the portability of their Narrative and the Law. Of course, the difference between American Mobility and Jewish Diaspora was that whereas white Americans felt 'at home' even as they moved from home to home across the great spaces of America, Jews had always felt away from home even as they settled in various parts of Europe, Arabia, and North Africa. A Jew in France wasn't really French, a Jew in Poland wasn't really Polish, a Jew in Germany wasn't really German, and etc. And yet, Jews were promised that a Jew in America could truly become an American and as such was truly 'at home' no matter where he lived in the United States. For a people who hadn't had a taste of homeland for nearly two millenniums, the American Dream was intoxicating for Jews. Just like a famished person over-eats upon being presented with food, Jews gorged on the idea of America as 'homeland'. And yet, there was the paradox. America could be a homeland for the Jews precisely because it wasn't the homeland for a particular people. A nation like Poland or Russia couldn't really be the homeland of Jews because, even if Jews there were allowed to live in peace and prosperity, there would be the constant reminders that Poland really and mainly belongs to the Polish and Russia really and mainly belongs to the Russians. In contrast, if America belongs to no particular people, then it belongs to all the world, and that means Jews could claim it as much as any other people. There was certainly an aspect of Americanism that suggested as much, at least as a Dream, but the American Reality was very different. In fact, America was a specific racial and cultural creation, and it couldn't have been created by any other people. Pete Buttplug(aka Buttigieg) says 'white supremacism' will ruin America, but America wouldn't exist in the first place if not for 'white supremacism' and 'racism'. And this would become a great contradiction of Americanism. But there is another contradiction, that between Jews seeing America as belonging to the whole world(including the Jews) and Jews seeing America as belonging to themselves to own as their empire.
Is there any way White Americans can reclaim the United States as essentially an extension of European Civilization? Maybe, maybe not, but it seems unlikely. If things continue as usual, the US will become a giant California. As Texas is poised to go Democratic in a matter of years, the GOP won't be able to win elections again UNLESS it becomes just another Democratic Party. But then, it's been useless on the issue of immigration and demographic Replacism for as long as anyone can remember. After all, the mantra of both parties became DIOS or Diversity Is Our Strength, a suicidal chant programmed into white minds by the Jews. But then, once US loses its core identity and meaning, most peoples, white and non-white, will lose their sense of identity, heritage, and history.
If Americanism is defined merely as a futurism, most Americans will have little or no sense of the past and just look forward to the latest fad/fashion or trend. They will be like kids who, having no sense of the past, just look forward to new thrills and excitements. Kids are born with blank slate memories. Unless they are taught of the history of their own people, they know NOTHING. Historical memory isn't passed genetically. This is why kids are mainly fixated on the next meal, next prize, next cookie & candy, next thrill, next excitement. And Americans, even in adulthood, have become like kids. Instead of turning into grownups, they become 'growndowns' as their mentalities are focused on new razzle-dazzles: New sports seasons, new blockbuster movie, new pop song release, etc. While those who ONLY look backward will be mired in the past and fail to make progress, those who've mastered the art of looking forward and backward(like the Roman god Janus) will have a decisive advantage over those who only look forward(or backward). The Amish won't amount to much because they only look backward. But those who only look forward will lose out to those who look forward/backward... and eventually even to those who only look backward(as ultra-traditionalists at least have something deep to cling to). While those who only look forward may succeed as talented individuals, they haven't any deep theme to bind them with others of their kind and with their ancestors. A white forwarder thinks and feels as an individual. If smart and talented, he may do remarkable things in science/technology/arts. If untalented and stupid, he will likely wallow in insipid thrills of the moment. But in either case, he can only succeed or fail as an individual. He isn't part of a history, culture, or heritage(that serves as the great equalizer and uniter of the successful and unsuccessful within the race). Even if successful, his money is all about himself. Or, lacking a sense of belonging and history, he will likely donate his money to the latest fads and fashions in 'social justice', like Fund the Magic Negro or invest in Globo-Homo.
In contrast, if you're backward-looking as well as forward-looking, then you not only work towards individual success in the future but feel a powerful sense of connection to the past(with its deep history and line of ancestors). This is why Jews and Hindus are now favored over the deracinated whites who only look forward as Futurist Americans. Looking only forward, they've forgotten where they've come from and who their ancestors are. Also, under Jewish control, the only thing they know about their own past is now associated with 'white guilt' and 'white shame' for all the wrongs ever committed. In contrast, even as Jews(and Hindus) push forward in science/technology and etc., they also feel a powerful connection with deep roots of history, culture, and heritage. They understand that a tree, in order to grow higher, must rely on roots to draw water and nutrients deep in the soil. Also, it is the roots that provide balance and stability so that the tree can remain standing against the wind and other forces. This is why Jews and Hindus want the power of History(backward-looking) only for themselves while they urge whites to look only forward to the Great Future... of Diversity. If whites had a powerful sense of history, they would object to Diversity. They would feel proudly white and struggle to keep their domain as white as possible. But under Jewish mind-control, whites have either forgotten their glorious past or been told that it was all shameful and evil, therefore requiring the smashing of White Idols and erasure of White Icons to make way for the redemptive symbols of Diversity(and oddly enough, Globo-Homomania, as if celebration of homo fecal-penetration and tranny penis-cutting has the magical power to wash whites of 'guilt'). This is why Jews and Hindus live in the past, present, and future, whereas the great majority of whites only live in the future. And if the future is anti-white or less-white, whites don't mind because their lack of white-past-ness has failed to instill them with the requisite sense of identity, glory, and pride that would want to make them defend what they're about. Suppose Jews only looked forward and never backward. Why would they care about Israel or the Holy Land? Why would they care about the meaning of Jewishness? Why would they care about what happened in the Shoah? Furthermore, suppose Jews allowed non-Jews(especially those who are hostile to Jews) to rewrite Jewish history so as to selectively shape the Narrative to make Jewish History look pretty bad. Then, most Jews will prefer to look only forward because looking backward would be pretty depressing OR will look backward only to feel guilty about their shameful past, which would only embolden to make amends to rest of humanity by committing to do everything possible to erase the evil Social Construct of Jewishness that has done so much harm to the world. But in our world, Jews have the upper-hand over whites because whereas Jews, like Janus, look backward to look forward, white folks only look forward for atomized success/thrills or look backward only to wallow in 'white guilt'. Of course, there are plenty of whites, especially libertarian-types, who look only forward without much in the way of 'white guilt', but having no sense of roots or pastness, they have no compelling theme with which to link up with other white folks to form a united racial front like the Jews(and Hindus) have done for themselves.
The great fatal mistake of White America was to trust the Jews. Why did Anglo-Americans so miscalculate the Jews? It was because they imposed their own ideal of the Jew onto the Jew, and the psychological savvy Jew read the White Mind and, at least partially, played the role of the Ideal Jew just enough to hoodwink whites. It's like whites also had this ideal vision of the Noble Negro as a credit to his race. This had little to do with the Real Negro. It's like some people have this romantic view of Gypsies as free spirits and soulful folks when, if anything, most Gypsies are a bunch of petty crooks and idiots. It's like boomers of Counterculture had this rosy view of Hindus and Eastern Mysticism when, in fact, too many Hindu gurus and the like were egotists, frauds, charlatans, or madmen. Also, contrary to the notion of Asian-Indians living in harmonic-karmic relation to spirituality and cosmos, most dotkins were petty, stupid, nasty, greed, and materialistic bunch whose main wishes during prayer was More Money. The Counterculture fools also idealized the American Indians as the children of nature who'd communed peacefully with animals and trees before the arrival of Evil White Man. While one can acknowledge the deep 'spiritual' connection between Indians and pre-Columbian America, the fact is the Red Savages were brutal folks(like the ones in Michael Mann's THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS).
Generally, the powerful are more likely to weave idealized misconceptions about the Other. As they got the power, they feel free and secure to romanticize weaker groups. And as they control the information and narrative, they can create myths of the Other and then prefer the Myth over the Reality. Having all that power and security makes them feel magnanimous, a noble trait. Such illusions aren't particularly dangerous IF the Other has little or chance of gaining real power. White Americans can idealize and even idolize American Indians or Eskimos all they want. The fact is the Indians or Eskimos are never going to amass the kind of power to threaten whites. But when whites came to prefer myth over reality in regard to Jews and Negroes, it was a fatal mistake as Jews had the will, talent, and means to gain great power; and blacks had the numbers, muscle, and arrogance to do real harm to weaker and wussier whites. Of course, powerful whites initially idealized Jews and blacks when the latter groups were much weaker. There was a time when blacks were indeed second-class citizens in the US. Also, as blacks feared white power and reprisals(that could sometimes be very violent) back then, they tended to behave better, and this made certain elite and/or reformist whites to feel special sympathy for the Tragic Groid. Likewise, there was a time when most Jews from Russia and Eastern Europe looked like a pitiable lot, the kind lamented in the Bob Dylan song, "I Pity the Poor Immigrant".
There are two realities. Reality as it really is and 'Reality' as one sees it. The latter may be called 'Seeality'. This is why so many marriages go wrong. Suppose one person idealizes his/her partner as the most wonderful lover. He/she becomes so besotted with the idea of love and being wedded to the other person that he/she ignores all the hints, clues, and signals that, maybe just maybe, that person is NOT the dream-partner or ideal soulmate. One's dream, passion, illusion, hope, and/or compassion blinds his/her vision to the Real Person. Such illusion can exist between humans and animals too. Why do some people end up dead mauled by animals? Because they insist on seeing certain animals as their 'friends' or even 'family members'. One person convinced himself that the alligators he'd raised regarded him as a 'friend'. He projected his humanness onto the mega-reptiles that, in time, killed and ate him. Just like American Indians who aided early white settlers had no idea of the true nature of white folks, Anglo-Americans had no sense of the Real Jew, not least because white minds were clouded with the vision of the Ideal Jew. When Jews washed ashore poor and powerless, Anglo-American elites were blinded by compassion and idealism, the notion that America is so wonderful that even Jews, who had a long troublesome history with Christendom in Europe, would become Good Americans and get along as capital fellows with white Christian folks. Instead of trying to figure out the Real Jew, they imposed their idealized view of the Ideal Jew on the Real Jew. Later, as Jews gained in power at the expense of Wasps, Anglo-Americans concocted new hopes that, once again, ran counter to reality. Liberal Wasps saw Jews as committed crusaders for justice for all mankind while Conservative Whites hope that Jews would eventually come to realize their own deep conservative roots, learn to bury the hatchet with white Christians, and invest their great wealth & influence for the good of Western Civilization. Neither bunch of whites had the wherewithal to see the Real Jew for what he really is. White folks will remain hopeless unless they come to See the Real Jew at last. Likewise, Europe will become Africanized and turned into a hell unless white people there See the Real Negro at last. Due to Jewish control of media/narrative and black success in sports/pop-music, too many white folks have this notion that blacks are tragic-magic, the redeemers of much tainted white civilization, i.e. the white world can only be redeemed if white lands, white wombs, and white everything are touched and healed by Black Magic. Reality will be the biggest human tragedy ever, what with savage black Africans rampaging through Europe and Africanizing everything they see and touch... just like the Siafu African ants in THE HELLSTROM CHRONICLE lay waste to everything in their path. Black destructiveness is so obvious that one would think white folks would have woken up by now, so why are so many of them still asleep? One reason is Jews and privileged cuck-whites(who are are sheltered from the racial reality) control the media and spread the image of the Magic Negro that become the 'seeality' for countless whites. Another reason is the song-and-dong factor. So many whites are so addicted to black music and so many white women are so into jungle fever that they mainly associate white surrender to blackness as pleasure in dance and sex. Another reason is 'guilt' and fear. Even whites who know the truth about blacks are nevertheless infected with 'white guilt' and feel paralyzed to saying anything negative or alarming about the ghastly 'groids'. And there is the Fear Factor as anyone even slightly associated with 'racism' will be fired, destroyed, blacklisted, and even physically attacked(with full blessing of the Power).
At any rate, if indeed White America is lost(because white folks just don't have the necessary will, courage, unity, confidence, pride, organization, or good sense), then... to whom should America belong? To all the world, what with the US as Immigration-Nation? If whites relinquished the title of the rightful owners of America, then it seems the only 'fair' and 'just' outcome would be America as free-for-all for all the world. Suppose a pack of wolves bring down a moose and claim it as their own and gorge on it. But then, suppose the wolves figure, "We had enough, and the remaining moose meat isn't simply ours but for all of you", the 'you' being all the other creatures who've gathered around the mass of meat: Coyotes, badgers, eagles, hawks, buzzards, weasels, raccoons, foxes, Gila Monsters, carnivorous turtles, cougars, bears, wild pigs, and etc. If the wolves no longer claim it, then the feast should be a free-for-all for all creatures great and small. It would make no sense for wolves to give it up to all the other animals ONLY TO have one particular species make special claim on it. Ideally, the wolves should have kept it as they'd brought down the moose. But if wolves lost their good sense and decided to share the meat with all the creatures, then it should belong to all equally. But suppose weasels come forth and say that THEY should have special claim to it... even as weasels argue that it was good on the part of wolves to hand it over to the other animals in the name of 'fairness' and 'justice'. But if so, why should the weasels have special claim on the moose meat, taking the choice parts for themselves while doling out only second-rate and third-rate meat and innards for the other creatures? Indeed, IF one particular bunch of creatures must have claim over the meat, it should be the wolves because they brought down the moose. If the wolves give up their claim to the meat, then NO OTHER bunch of creatures should lay special claim to it. They must all share the meat equally. Then, how ridiculous it would be for the weasels to insist that the meat belongs especially to their own kind.
Such is the dilemma facing Future America. There used to be White America that was founded, made, and claimed by whites as their great domain. It was the America of THE BIG COUNTRY, the magnificent William Wyler Western. Whites were takers of the land and makers of the nation. They had every reason to lay special claim on it. But, especially under the influence of rising Jewish Power that pushed the Immigration-Narrative over the Founder-Settler Narrative, there developed the idea that America must be the land for all the peoples of the world. Apparently, America is too big, bountiful, blessed with over-abundant resources, and filled with potential for it to be greedily hogged by one bunch of people. Something that magnificent, wonderful, and incredible has to be shared with all the world.
For whatever reasons — idealism, magnanimity, generousness, compassion, gullibility, fear of rising Jewish power, fear of black rage, madness, stupidity, & apathy, naivete, greed for cheap labor, etc. — , whites decided to forsake their special claim to America and re-brand the nation as a Proposition Nation of Immigration and Diversity(and 'Inclusion' too). This was a terrible decision on the part of whites, but madness on such scale could hardly be reversed. It's like when the lord made the rash decision to relinquish his power to his sons in Akira Kurosawa's RAN, there was nothing to stop it. He had the power to give it up, and he did. There was once a time when white folks could have kept the title as owners of America, but they made the fatal decision to open America to all the world. Imagine if some rich guy is persuaded to withdraw all his money from the bank and hand it over to the people. It'd be most retarded, but if he's going to do such a thing, then the fair thing would be for him to throw all that cash into the winds from a high tower so that everyone below has a equal chance of getting some. But what if the very people who goaded the rich person to give it all away also convinced him to hand over most of the money to them so that THEY would decide who gets what. What would be the purpose of surrendering one's own money to The People IF the bulk of the cash actually ends up in the hands of a tiny cabal of shysters who claim to work for the public trust.
If White People give up their special claim to America, then it should belong to the world. I'd pity such an America of endless immigration and deracination all around, of whites and non-whites alike, a nation that has no majority but is made up of minorities of backgrounds from all over the world. But such an eventuality is still preferable to an America claimed especially by a particular group that has no historical rights to it. While Jews have made great contributions to America, they were not the founders, settlers, or builders who made it possible. They were mostly late-comers who benefited greatly by taking advantages of the system already in place.
Furthermore, it is especially wrong for Jews to lay special claim to America because the very essence of their argument against America-as-White-Nation hinged on the New America being a Global Nation equally open to and representative of All Mankind. If such was the 'moral' and 'intellectual' argument that finally convinced White America to give way to New Global America, then Jews have no grounds to demand special privileges. They should be like everyone else in the New America that no longer plays favors to any single group. But if Jews insist that New America must especially be sensitive and obedient to Jewish and Zionist agendas, then the Jewish argument against White America would have been just an elaborate hustle. Jews persuaded whites to give up special claim to America to hand it on a silver platter to the whole world, BUT, when the moment finally arrived, Jews snatched the platter mainly for themselves. It's so much like what Facebook and Google did to become monopolies. They gained the trust and participation of EVERYONE, 'left' and 'right', on the promise that they would not be biased toward any particular group. After all, if Google and Facebook had revealed their ideological agendas and/or tribal biases from the very beginning, many people would have refused their services and sought out alternatives. But because they promised impartiality and fairness, EVERYONE regardless of race, creed, or color signed up to use their search engines and platforms. But once the Jews at Google and Facebook gained monopoly positions, they rigged results and gamed algorithms to favor the views and agendas of their Tribe and ideology. It was all just a hustle. Terms of Service mean nothing to Google and Facebook Jews. They know that with monopoly power, they can change the Terms as they wish, and there is nothing that anyone can do about it, especially as they've bought up so many whore politicians. Furthermore, the Jew-dominated media have their back, and most top judges and lawyers are either Jewish or controlled by Jewish money and power. It's so dirty.
Because the US is the lone superpower, it can do great harm as well as great good around the world. While Anglo-American history is checkered with the bad as well with the good, the so-called Wasps have not been without some sense of honor, decency, nobility, and rectitude. Also, as white elites of an overwhelmingly white-majority and white-dominant nation, there was a clear sense of American history, American reality, and American destiny. There was good deal of correlation between the American People and the American Way, its diplomacy around the world.
Today, things are so confused. While there are plenty of Anglo-Germanic Americans in upper echelons of business and government still, they are no longer the ruling elites. Even the richest and most powerful of them must look over their shoulders at Jewish Power that really rules America. But Jews won't step up to the plate as the New Elites of America. They still hide Jewish Power behind the drapery of 'white privilege'. Even as the owners and managers of America, they still insist on using mostly white goy politicians as their players and buffers. Thus, even though New America is obviously all about "Is it good for Jews?", we are not supposed to notice that Jews are pulling the strings. We are supposed to believe that so many cuck goy politicians chant "We Stand with Israel" spontaneously out of their own volition as American as Apple Pie. We have a situation where so many white/goy politicians still hold positions of power but actually have little power as they do little but the bidding of Jews. They are out front but have no will or agenda of their own. They are puppets. As for Jews, they remain behind the scenes or pretend too even though some of them are so prominent in American Power and Global Affairs. We are not supposed to notice that the likes of George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Hollywood Jews, Las Vegas Jews(like Sheldon Adelson), Google Jews, and the like are the real movers and shakers of America that, in turn, shakes the whole world. Just ask the Palestinians.
As the US is the lone superpower with the means to destroy entire nations, why should Jews, who make up only 2% of the population, wield the hammer and have the ultimate say on how American Power is to be used around the world? The only people with a rightful historical claim to America are white Christian Americans. As they gave up their title in the name of America as Proposition Nation for all the world, Jews have no right to claim special ownership of and privileges in America. Indeed, recent events especially following the end of the Cold War has demonstrated the dangers of America-as-lone-superpower being controlled and manipulated for the narrow, supremacist, and hegemonic interests of a tiny minority. Just consider the Wars for Israel that have devastated and/or displaced millions of people. Look what Jewish-Americans, in cahoots with Russian Jews, did to the Russian economy in the 1990s; Jews could pull such a massive scam because they took the Big Stick from the Wasps. Look how Jews made the plight of Palestinians even worse while Israel has been indulged without limit despite its increasingly arrogant and aggressive policies. Consider how Israel is rewarded for having 300 illegal nukes while Iran is economically strangled despite having no nukes and complying with international inspections. And if the New America is all about equality for all, why have so many Jewish crooks, thieves, and gangsters been able to get away with so many crimes and abuses? Where is equal justice in all this?
Consider America as a gun. There was a time when it was a gun held by whites. But Jews told whites that it's unfair and dangerous for whites to own the gun, thereby having unjust power and advantage over other groups. So, whites put the gun on the table so that it could be owned by all, and the only way such would be possible is if the gun is disassembled into pieces whereby every group would get a piece of it. That way, no single group could hold the gun to his advantage over others. It would have just a piece, like all other groups. But that didn't happen. Jews grabbed the gun for themselves while handing a toy gun to whites to give the impression that whites still have the gun that has yet to be dismantled and shared equally among all groups. But in fact, the real gun, the real power, is with the Jews who press it on the back of cuck-whites who now have no choice but to do the bidding of Jews. If America were a poor and weak country, it wouldn't matter who owned or ran it. After all, who cares about who owns or runs Burma or Botswana. But the US is the lone superpower and has the power to destroy entire worlds. Thus, American power must be in held by a good people. A decent, sane, and responsible people.
Even though White America was far from saintly or even all that good, it was still better than most nations around the world, many of which were downright tyrannical, crazy, or evil. Also, with Anglo-Americans at the helms of power, the world got to more-or-less understand, anticipate, predict, and even appreciate what Americanism was all about. There emerged a certain pattern of Wasp attitudes and behavior.
But with the demise of Wasp rule and rise of Jewish Power that remains behind the curtain, it's been very confusing to the world as to what America is really about. Sure, plenty of people around the world know that the US is Jew-ruled, but because Jews go out of their way to punish anyone or any nation deemed 'antisemitic'(that now means any honest assessment or noticing of Jewish power), even powerful nations like China, Russia, Indian, and Iran dare not say the JEWS are behind American Power. As for America's obnoxious expressions of obeisance to Israel, Zionism, and Jews? Isn't that evidence enough that Jews control America? But you better not say that. We are to believe that all the politicians, celebrities, and cucks who sing hosannas to Jews and Israel do so purely out of the goodness of their noble hearts because, after all, there is nothing more inspiring in life than to love the Jew, revere the Jew, worship the Jew. Oh no, Jewish Power didn't make me play fetch and roll over before Jews. I did it out of my own free will because Jews, oh the Jews, are the Chosen, the Holy, the Awesome. This game is very dangerous.
If Whites won't retake America as their special creation and nation, then the only two honest options are (1) We all demand that Jews admit that they are the new elites and take full responsibility on those grounds, i.e. Jews must be fully accountable as the New Rulers of America, taking credit when things go well but taking blame when things fail. (2) Jews give up their dominant position in the US just like Wasps have done and then sincerely work to ensure that America will really belong to All peoples and will not favor any particular group. In other words, the US will not favor Israel over Palestinians and Iran. It will not favor Jewish globalists against Russia. It will not consider Jewish interests as of paramount importance in decision-making. While Jewish interests will be heard and considered, NO MORE SO than the interests of other groups. It's like the US plays it fair between Greeks and Turks on the issue of Cyprus. If US were truly a World Nation, then it must handle the Israel-Palestinian conflict in the same manner. It must stop insisting that "Israel is America's greatest ally", a supremacist sentiment if there ever was one. And if white goyim are to be hounded for their over-representation in many fields, the same criticisms must be leveled at preponderance of Jewish wealth and power in so many upper areas.
Since the end of the Cold War, Arabs and Muslims especially know about the dangers of the Lone Superpower being controlled by one single group. Jews are only 2% of the US population, but they took the steering wheel of the Battleship and have been using their position to make American superpower might to favor Zionists over Arabs and Muslims EVEN WHEN Israel is clearly in the wrong. When we look at the devastation of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen due to Jewish control of America(and when we consider the economic tragedy visited on Iran due to Jewish-controlled US foreign policy), we can understand why Arabs and Muslims would like to see the US belonging to all the world. They probably wouldn't mind who owned or controlled America IF American Might wasn't used to bring about so much agony and suffering to the Arabs and/or Muslims in the Middle East. And Arabs and Muslims know it's been the way it is because the US, despite its growing diversity, is firmly controlled by Jews. Indeed, the burgeoning Diversity has, in some ways, emboldened Jewish Power even more because Jews have been able to use Diversity to undermine white power(as rival to Jewish Power). As most of Diversity doesn't have the brains, will, and/or guts to rise to the top, Jews hold most of the power. and Jews play Diversity against whites and whites against Diversity while they themselves are served by both whites and Diversity as Jews, as high priests and high financiers, control both the Money and the 'Morality'.
America used to be a White Nation. And then, we were told it is to be a World Nation. And in the current year, we are supposed to believe that America belongs equally to all the world and rejects any kind of 'racism' or 'bigotry'. And yet, this is all just a ruse because the US went from a white-owned nation to a Jewish-controlled nation. Even though its increasing Diversity lends the outward appearance of a World Nation, its inner-workings of power leave no doubt that it is a Jewish supremacist colony, the jewel in the crown(or yarmulke) of the Empire of Judea. And that must end for there to be balance and lasting peace around the world. America should belong to whites, but if whites gave up the title, then it must belong to the world. It must not belong to Jewish hustlers who yammer about the America as the World but only really care about World Hegemony by the Tribe.
To understand what is really going on, whites must realize they are the New Palestinians. One of the reasons why Jewish Power got so arrogant and aggressive is because it was allowed to get away with the destruction of Palestine. Here was an innocent people minding their own business and never having done anything in the 20th century to wreck other peoples' nations. By 'innocent', I don't mean Palestinians are angels. Like rest of humanity, there are good and bad among Palestinians on the individual level. Instead, as a people, Palestinians have not constituted one of the major consequential powers of the 19th and 20th centuries. Their contribution to the world, positive or negative, has been nil. In contrast, Germans and British were very consequential, for both good and evil in the two centuries; same could be said of Jews.
Anyway, there were the Palestinians, minding their own business. They had nothing to do with European wars or imperialism. If anything, Arabs(Christian or Muslim) in that part of the world were under Ottoman domination until early 20th century when the British Imperialists took over. In the last century, Palestinians had nothing to do with World War I, Communism, rise of Fascism, Western Imperialism, World War II, and the Cold War. And yet, they were targeted for destruction simply because Zionist Jews wanted the land. Why Jews wanted it was understandable given its historical and spiritual significance. Even early Zionists who were non-religious or anti-religious understood that the support from World Jewry for a Jewish Homeland would be greater IF the main theme was about reclaiming the Holy Land for the Jews.
When the Zionist enterprise began, it was hardly a certainty that Palestine would one day become Israel. But when Jews fix their minds on a goal, they look for countless ways to achieve it against all odds. They don't give up until they get what they want... like Charles Grodin's character in THE HEARTBREAK KID won't give up until he gets the blonde goyess.
But then, with their massive fortunes and influence, Jews also had plenty of odds on their side. All manner of trickery and manipulations were used. Arabs in Palestine were assured that Jews would not replace them. Arabs were assured that Jews were coming in peace and merely wanted to co-exist as friendly neighbors. Jews courted Arab collaborators to the Zionist cause with massive bribes. Jews pleaded with Big Powers such as UK, USSR, the US, and even Nazi Germany to aid Jews in the gradual-to-dramatic takeover of Palestine. Jews manipulated Christians into believing that Jewish victory would constitute a Modern Crusade, reclamation of the Holy Land by the West(as Israel would be a 'Western Liberal Democracy' controlled by white European Jewry). Jews also milked the Shoah theme to guilt-bait the West into supporting the Jewish State, said to be a necessary bulwark against Another Holocaust. (But if Jews were concerned about survival above all, it's rather odd that their homeland would be situated as an island in a sea of resentful Arabs/Muslims as Israel was created by oppression and mass expulsion of Palestine's Arab/Muslim/Christian population.) So, the impossible dream became a potential plan and then an inevitable program. This is how Jews think. They ask themselves, "What do we want really badly? How difficult is our goal? If very difficult, what can we do to circumvent or overcome the obstacles to get what we want?" Most peoples, when faced with an impossible task, just give up and decide to live and let live. But when Jews really really want something, no matter how impossible it may seem, they maniacally go about looking for ways to finally achieve it by any means necessary. This is how Jews turned impossible into real with Zionism. Jews also did this with the Bolshevik Revolution. Jews also did it with the takeover of America's elite institutions. In the early 20th century, Jews dreamed of taking over the US from Wasps, but it was just a hope. But they never gave up and became the new masters. And who would have thought US would come to worship Globo-Homomania as the new religion? Few decades ago, people would have laughed at the notion of 'gay marriage', bakers destroyed for refusing to bake 'gay wedding cakes', hysteria of 'pride month', and entire cities shut down to celebrate homo fecal-penetration and tranny-penis cutting as rainbow pageants. (Jews have powerful personalities with hooks. Once they get a hold on something, they never let go. Could St. Paul and early Jewish Christians have achieved the seemingly impossible task of promoting and spreading the new religion if not for their powerful personalities that could never take NO for an answer? Even as they preached 'turn the other cheek', they insisted on preaching into every ear. Today's Jews preach 'turn the other ass cheek'.) But Jews wanted Homomania, and they went about pulling every dirty trick in the book to make it happen. They bought off all the politicians. They threatened and blackmailed philosemitic cuckservatives into obeisance. Jews not only got power of finance and media but have lots of intelligence(dirt) on everyone, and we know most GOP politicians have skeletons in their closets. Again, Jews made the impossible possible and then made it real(and then even holy). Now, Jews are targeting 1st Amendment and 2nd Amendment. Those are to be AINO or Amendments in Name Only. The Florida Law and many others that target BDS are clear violations of the First Amendment, but Jews got the power and the means to circumvent just about anything. Also, with Jewish monopoly of media and internet platforms(by direct ownership, financial favoritism, or moral threats/blackmail), Jews are shutting down free speech on Facebook, Google-Youtube, Wordpress, Twitter, and Amazon. Twitter and Amazon(and Apple and Microsoft) are not Jewish-owned but have Jewish ADL and Jewish-funded SPLC breathing down their necks.
Also, Jews have recruited the vain, fussy, and relentless homos to do their bidding. Tim Cook(of the 'my gay bung is adored by god' school) will collaborate with Jews who stoke the vapid narcissism of homos who want to be adored as fairy-gods over us all. Lately, ACLU seems to be pretty silent about all the shutdowns. So much for Jews being principled defenders of Free Speech and Civil Liberties. It all depends on Who/Whom.
By the way, this 'libertarian' talk that private companies have the right to shut down free speech is just a lot of hokum. First of all, different rules apply to monopolies. Second of all, the rules are not fair across the board but target mainly the dissident right, maverick conservatives, Palestinians, and whomever Jews & homos don't like. Notice Antifa is left alone to spread filth and bile on Twitter and Facebook. And FBI and local police departments let Antifa run amok. Certain groups are allowed to spew hatred. Again, it's a matter of who/whom. If blacks denounce whitey, that's okay, but if blacks denounce Jewish Power(as Nation of Islam has done), those 'crazy ni**ers' must be shut down, as with Amazon's banning of books by Farrakhan.
Furthermore, would any libertarian support an American company that denies service to Zionists on grounds that Israel is a terrorist state founded on ethnic cleansing and one that practices tyranny and mass-murder(directly against Palestinians and indirectly by spreading Wars for Israel)? Would David French and other such cucky ilk support any Arab-American owned monopoly that denies service to Jewish supporters of Zionism and Wars for Israel? Suppose Paypal were owned by Palestinian-Americans who claim that Zionism is hate speech and banned the likes of Bret Stephens and Jennifer Rubin from using the service. How many 'conservatives' and 'libertarians' would support such censorship or denial of service on grounds that private companies can do as they want? It's all bull.
Given the Jewish record of tenaciously, ruthlessly, cunningly, and deceptively doing all they can by any means necessary to get what they want -- ethnic cleansing of Palestinians & creation of Israel, Bolshevik Revolution, takeover of the US, rape of Russian economy in the 90s, promotion of Homomania, mainstreamization of pornography, spread of PC, mass replacement in Europe, the New Cold War with Russia, Globo-Homomania as the new cult of the West, Shoah from historical tragedy to neo-spiritual dogma, proselytization of interracism(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs), vilification of whiteness as Evil(unless redeemed by cucking to Jews, homos, Negroes, and immigrant-invaders), Wars for Israel, and etc. -- , we should NEVER underestimate the Jewish Will to Power. Jews never give up. Even when they seem peaceable, they are like dormant volcanoes burning with hot lava underneath. So, if Jews want to destroy Free Speech and Gun Rights -- and they've already done so halfway in the US -- , they may well get their wish.
Now, why do Palestinians matter so much in this equation? Because Jews got their first taste of achieving the impossible with the Zionist project. Some may argue that the Bolshevik Revolution was the first great Jewish victory in the modern era, but despite the significance of the Jewish role, it wasn't entirely a Jewish project, and some Jews paid a price under communism. In contrast, Zionism was a very Jewish project, and Jews were, incredibly enough, able to garner the support of the great gentile powers, both pro-Jewish and anti-Jewish, to make their dream come true. Also, the endless US and European support of(and eventually servility to) Zionism and Israel all through the years emboldened Jews to believe that they can do just about anything but still rely on the unconditional support of Western powers. Whether it was the Six Day War, USS Liberty attack, or myriad other malfeasance by Israel and its lobbying groups in US and Europe, Jews came to expect that they can get away with murder and still get all the prizes. They could be like Jack the Ripper and win the Jackpot at every turn. And the Zionist project was fulfilled at the expense of Palestinians, an innocent people.
So, that begs the question: If Jews are capable of doing such a terrible thing to such an innocent people, what are they capable of doing to YOUR KIND? All peoples must ask this question as Jews control the US as the sole superpower with its hooks and claws into all parts of the world. If Jews treat Palestinians like shit, why would they treat your people any differently? And if they used deceit, terror, and tyranny(with lots of hypocrisy) against Palestinians, why wouldn't they do the same to your people? Jews at one time smiled at Palestinians and assured them that Zionism would NOT replace Palestinians with Jews. What a lie that was. Jews accuse Muslims of terrorism, but Israel was created by terrorist pioneers. Jews bitch about white 'racism', but Israel has been practicing Jim Crowitz and Chutzpartheid forever. Jews bitch about Nazis and Warsaw ghetto, but Gaza is an ghetto and IDF death squads mow down women and children. Incredibly, Jews say Africans and Muslims may replace Europeans and take over as 'New Europeans'(even though blacks and Arabs have no historical roots in the West), but Palestinians don't have the right to return to their lost homeland in what is now Israel.
To Jews, there are only two kinds of non-Jews: Palestinians and New Palestinians. All non-Palestinian gentiles are potentially New Palestinians. Granted, Jews will form alliances with some groups against others, but it's all in the name of "Is it good for Jews?" So, Jewish globalists will simultaneously encourage Polish and Ukrainian nationalism against Russia while, at the same time, using globo-homomania and Mandingo/Mandela Complex to undermine genuine ethno-nationalism in those nations. So, Polish and Ukrainian nationalisms are okay as long as they are anti-Russian but they cannot truly be pro-Polish or pro-Ukrainian against the forces of globalism. While they are encouraged to push against Big Bad Russia, they must put out to homos, blacks, and Jewish Power. In the end, all gentile nations are to be betrayed and discarded when the time comes... just like the Pigs in George Orwell's ANIMAL FARM send the horses to the glue factory after using them for all they're worth. The notion that Jews have any feeling for Ukrainians, Poles, or Saudis is a joke. They are all just temporary allies, just like Jews at one time used Christian Fundamentalists and Southern 'rednecks' as useful idiot supporters of Israel. But with globohomo as the new faith in the West, Jews are dumping on Christian Fundies and Southern Neo-Confederates. Jewish message to white southern Christians is "Help us erect our monuments to Jewish supremacism over the bones of Palestinians while we Jews aid blacks, Antifa, and Diversity to destroy Southern monuments to the Confederate dead.")
Even though Palestinians are more oppressed than whites as New Palestinians, in some ways the former are freer. Why? Because Palestinians have no illusions about Jews and Jewish Power. They've experienced it firsthand. They were lied to by Jews. They were victims of terror, war, Nakba Pogroms, and Chutzpartheid. They are slaves in body but free in soul. In contrast, even though whites as New Palestinians are physically & materially infinitely better off than most Palestinians(esp those in Gaza), they are mentally enslaved and pathetically shuck-and-jive before their Jewish massuhs like Negroes of the Old South.
One key difference between Jews and Whites-As-New-Palestinians or WANPs(as WASPs are finished and over) is that Jewish 'sympathy' for goyim is conditional and strategic, whereas WANP sympathy for Jews is blind and total. It's like master and dog. Jewish 'sympathy' is Kissingerian. Jews will even feign sympathy with Ukrainian Neo-Nazis or Muslims. Even as they berate the rise of 'white supremacism', they work with Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine to hurt Russia. Even as they use Wars for Israel to destroy Muslim nations, they pretend to care for poor poor Muslims as victims of evil Nazi Trump. So, Jews can shake your hand or break it. It all depends on "Is it good for Jews?" In contrast, WANPs are unconditional in their slavish sympathy for Jews. Even when Jews do most to shut down conservative speech, white pride, moral decency, Christian values, and equal justice for all, WANPs are first and foremost all about "muh Israel, muh Holocaust, muh holy shmoly Jews". And whatever Jews want and demand, WANPs comply and give. If Jews say Negroes are magical and ACOWW(Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) must be the future of white race, WANPs are happy to be cucky-wucks. It's incredible that White Americans who take so much pride in how America has come a 'long way' since the bad ole days of Jim Crow are now so blind to the all the anti-white hysteria spread by Jews(and anti-white violence carried out by black thugs) and the US support of Jim Crowitz in the West Bank and Gaza. Also, a nation that takes so much pride in having played a role in crushing Evil Nazism is fully behind near-genocidal Wars for Israel that have turned much of Middle East into what looks like battlegrounds of World War II. But then, how about that Madeleine Albright who recently wrote a book called 'Fascism'? This is the same woman who said killing 500,000 kids was worth it. There you go. American Morality under Jewish Power. To condemn Hussein for his human rights abuses, the US was right to push policies that destroyed half a million kids(by some estimates). Of course, if US forced sanctions on Israel for its human rights violations & warmongering and IF just a 100 Jewish kids died, it'd be called the New Holocaust. Apparently, Jewish lives count for more than Arab lives. Sounds a lot like Nazi Aryan Supremacism. It's almost like Semites are Supremites.
It should be obvious by now that Jewish Liberalism is a myth. Jews are Triberals, not true Liberals. Jews use Liberal lingo to push what is essentially a Tribal agenda. End of History hasn't been the triumph for Liberalism but for Triberalism, esp that of Jews. When Jews push universalism, they don't intended it to serve as a template for both Jews and non-Jews. Rather, universalism is used to weaken tribalism among non-Jews so that they can be made to support the mono-tribalism of the Jews, apparently the ONLY People worthy of identity, territory, and history. If one were to deconstruct Jewishness and argue that all Arabs-as-Semites should be allowed to move to Israel because there is no clear racial or cultural distinction between Jewish Semites and Arab Semites, one would be condemned as 'antisemitic' by Jews. But these very same Jews argue that there is no such distinction as an Englishman or Frenchman. The English might as well believe that blacks were always a big part of Britain. And guess what? The Middle Ages in Europe wasn't white or European. It was multi-culti. Notice how Jew-run media feature great European men of history as blacks or non-whites. It was crazy enough for Sub-Saharan blacks to claim that Ancient Egyptians were black, but now, the New Historiography is claiming that even Northern Europe was filled with blacks and other such folks. In a way, Jews know that people are naturally tribal. So, when people's natural tribalism of ethnicity is removed, they clutch for neo-tribal identities. Once whites are made to believe that it's NOT okay to be white, they reach for new identities. They either go for globo-homo which is deracinating and demoralizing OR they identify with Zion and cheer on the Jews as God's Chosen People. Or they go with jungle fever and cuckery and put out to blacks as the new Master Race. Or they lionize Immigrant-Invaders as the New Hope, as people who are 'more American than Americans' or 'more European than Europeans'.
But, if there is any people Whites should identify with, it is the Palestinians. Whites have most to learn from Palestinians because the latter suffered the greatest setback at the hands of Jews. They lost their land. They were denied their right of identity and history. They were scattered to the winds. They are poised to lose even West Bank. If Jews could do such a thing to Palestinians, whites really need to ask why Jews wouldn't do it to whites or any other bunch of gentiles.
Also, whites need to identify with Palestinians as penance and atonement. While white sympathy for Jews after WWII made good sense as Jews suffered terribly at the hands of Nazis, support for Zionism as redress for the Shoah made NO SENSE because Palestinians had NO part in World War II and Nazi mass killings. White people who were entirely responsible for WWI, WWII, and their associated horrors just dumped the Burden of Guilt on the Palestinians who never did anything. Given all the empty land in US, Canada, Australia, and Latin America, it's interesting that white people couldn't offer a piece of territory for Jews to have a homeland in those huge land masses. No, it had to be Palestine. Granted, Jews basically took over New York and other power centers as New Jerusalems, and in some ways, the US is like greater Israel whose new anthem should be the Carly Simon song:
Anyway, white people need to wake up. They must realize that they are the New Palestinians. In some perverse ways, whites are also the 'New Jews' in the sense that they are blamed and scapegoated for everything. David Cole wrote as much in a Takimag article: https://www.takimag.com/article/the-whites-are-our-misfortune/
What Cole leaves out is the question, "IF whites are like the 'new Jews'(the new 'Christ Killers' as the new christs are Jews of Shoah), THEN who are the New Nazis?" Ironically, Jews are the New Nazis as anti-white venom and vitriol are mainly the product of Jewish academics, media people, bankers, gangsters, psychopaths, and globalist agents. Some Jews hate whites so much that they want white lands to be Carthagenized with mass invasion, mass replacement, and colonization of white wombs by blacks. Those Jews are like Nazis in genocidal mode. Other Jews(such as David Cole) aren't so hostile. While not pro-white, they see the value of whiteness as crucial support system for Jews. Their attitude is like that of Nazis toward Hungarians, Italians, Croatians, and Romanians: Not as good as Aryan-Germans but useful and even essential as satellites and support system for Germany as the 1000 YR REICH. Some Jews as New Nazis look upon whites as New Jews to be effectively 'genocided' by Great Replacement and Race-mixing. Other Jews as New Nazis look upon whites as a lesser but useful race to keep the Jewish World Hegemony going. Jewish Power is divided between Jews who see whites as New Jews(deserving of dehumanization and destruction) and Jews who regard whites as Nazis regarded Romanians or Hungarians. Either way, Jewish attitude is supremacist. One bunch of Jews mean to destroy whites, and another bunch of Jews mean to use whites.
In the Israel/Palestine conflict, Jews are the New Nazis and Palestinians are the New Jews. (Granted, the notion of Old Jews or Real Jews of Old as pure-as-snow victims of white Christian evil is a cartoonish over-simplification. Contrary to David Cole's piece, there were legitimate reasons why Jews were hated in Europe. Not only did Jews play a role in the slave trade that sent countless Europeans to Muslim lands but Jews collaborated time and time again with Muslim invaders.) When we say 'New Jews', we refer to the condition of Jews when they were indeed punished and victimized beyond the breadth of their sins/crimes. Nazi excesses did place Jews in a position of special victimization. Though, in retrospect, much of antisemitism in the past seems somewhat valid and justifiable -- if Jews act the way they do today, there's a good chance they acted likewise in the past -- , Nazi horrors, like the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, were clearly disproportionate and crazy. Granted, it was only in the late 20th century and 21st century that we've come to see the Real Jew at last. It is when people have great power that they reveal their true face. Notice how Hitler pretended to be moderate and reasonable at times and showed his true face only when he'd amassed great power. Mao often presented himself as a humble 'agrarian reformer' to useful idiots of Western Journalism. But with great power, he eventually showed his true face with the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution. And with their dominant position in the world, Jews are now showing their true face. It's like the Bob Dylan song, "Seeing the Real You at Last". Jewish arrogance backed by awesome power is showing the Real Jew at last, what with globo-homomania, war on Christianity, war on whites, total takeover of West Bank, destruction of Middle East, new Cold War, total pornification of society, spread of gambling, finance as just a huge casino, and endless movies promoting anti-Muslim hatred and dehumanization so that duped whites will fight Wars for Israel.
The most effective way to resist Jewish Power is to go on the moral offensive. And the Palestinian issue is key to putting Jewish Power on the moral defensive because there was NO justification whatsoever for what was done to the Palestinians. While Jews suffered more in WWII than Palestinians did in the Nakba, in some ways the crime against Palestinians was worse. Why? Because Jews, along with many others, got burned for playing with fire. In the first half of the 20th century, nations such as Germany, Britain, France, Russia, US, and Japan were playing a dangerous game of empire. And Jews were among the great powers. Though they didn't have a nation of their own, the Jewish World Network was extensive from New York to London to Paris to Berlin to Moscow. As Jews played financial games, pushed radical movements, and spread degeneracy during the Weimar period, they were key players in the events that led to great wars and destruction. Same goes for the Japanese. They played with fire and got burned real bad. So did the Germans.
But what did the Palestinians do? They did nothing but lost their nation and were dehumanized. Worse, as if to rub salt in Palestinian wounds, most Americans, both conservative and liberal, fully supported Zionism against Palestinians who were treated as a bunch of faceless nobodies. And even now, in states red and blue, Palestinian-Americans are denied rights and dismissed from jobs because they won't pledge to support Israel's oppression of their people.
The Palestinian issue will expose the supremacist character of Jewish Power. The question, "If Jews treat Palestinians that way, why would they treat your people any differently?" Another question, "If your people support Jewish dehumanization of Palestinians, an innocent people, what right do they have to complain when Jews do the same to them?" It all began with Palestinians. When whites allowed, enabled, and encouraged Jews to murder Palestinians and get away with it, Jewish blood-lust just grew and grew and began to target the rest of humanity as New Palestinians.
Saying NO to Jewish dehumanization of Palestinians is the first step for whites to seek national liberation from Jewish supremacism. Also, by recognizing that they are the New Palestinians, whites will come to realize their true status in the world, i.e. they are not seeking 'white supremacism' but white national liberation from Jewish globalist hegemony. In some ways, Jewish supremacism is most problematic because Jewish Power tends to be hidden, ironically by the fact that Jews control the media that are supposed to serve as the window to the world and truth. But Jews have gained power of windows, screens, and tablets to project falsehoods on a massive scale. As Niall Ferguson wrote in his book about the square and the tower, the Elites are now working to shut down the Voice of the People.
It's elitism uber populism. (Only nationalism can bridge elitism and populism, but Jews deny nationalism to goyim.) Of course, Ferguson, being an ardent pro-Zionist cuck, will not mention that Jews control the Tower. Still, Jewish Power is in a precarious state despite its awesomeness. On the one hand, it has to sensationalize White Power/Privilege as the real danger to the world(when not hyperventilating about Iran, Russia, and China as yellow peril), and yet, without white support and servility, Jewish Power has no legs to stand on. How to keep the white horse strong and sturdy but also mindlessly obedient and hostile to the idea of its own freedom. Jewish Power has indoctrinated whites into believing 'slavery is freedom'. Whites have been made freephobic. Why? Because PC says whites are innately born 'racist' and evil, and therefore, white freedom will lead to white evils. Therefore, the only way to ensure white goodness is by making whites cucking to Other peoples as the Master Race.
On the other hand, we shouldn't fall for notions such as White Altruism, pathological or not. White people are not really more altruistic. That's just a myth. Rather, they are servile suckers to the power. Notice how so-called white altruism always operates in accordance to what the Power dictates. Where has white altruism been for Palestinians? Why is white altruism in the current year all about being pro-immigrant but almost nothing about American Indians? Hasn't white altruism figured out that mass immigration led to 'genocides' that wiped out the native indigenous cultures of the New World? If white altruism were real, whites would feel sympathy for all non-whites equally, but this isn't so. White sympathy is totally molded by the Power. Where was white altruism when Obama was killing all those Muslims? German Guilt is also a myth. Now, it may well be that many Germans are sincerely guilt-ridden over WWII and Holocaust, but it has nothing to do with innate white altruism or genuine individual conscience. One thing for sure, Germans were certainly without altruism during World War II. German Guilt is purely the product of mass indoctrination by the powers-that-be. If German Guilt was real, then why are Germans so lacking in guilt about Russians and Poles? Germans killed more Russians than Jews. Poland was ravaged by Germany. But while Germans suck up to Jews, they work with the West to destroy Russia and feel no guilt about doing so. And Germans berate Poles to be invaded by Africans and Muslims. So much for German Guilt. Germans are just sucking up to Power that is now Jewish... just like East Germans once sucked up to the Soviets. When black slaves were under white rule, many were raised to believe that they exist to serve the Great White Master. Back then, blacks seemed 'pathologically altruistic'. It was just social control.
But then, race-ism, in one form or another, is baked into everything. So-called 'progressives' or progs are really just a bunch of 'progracists'. They too have their 'intersectional' hierarchies of which groups deserve more Pokemon Points. Jews are favored over Arabs by both Democrats and Republicans. Nancy Pelosi says even if Congress were to burn to the ground, US will be there for Israel. She hasn't uttered a word about Palestinians. Trump and Trumptards suck up to Jews and dump on Palestinians even as Jews treat them like New Palestinians. Jungle Feverists and Cucks worship blacks as the master-mandingo race while Ken Burns and his ilk worship Magic Negroes as a race of Nelson Mandelas. No such sympathy exists for Arabs and Arafat, even though literally 100,000s of Arabs have been killed by Wars for Israel(what with Christian Arabs getting it especially bad). Black crime is terminologically whitewashed because truth about blacks is 'racist'. Apparently, blacks are so holy that news media must pretend blackness had no relation to heightened criminality. Jews denounce Old White America as 'racist' & 'white supremacist' and celebrate New America as an equal place for ALL, but then they say ALL Americans must support Israel Uber Alles and never criticize Jewish Power even as Jews never stop badmouthing Russians, Iranians, Palestinians, whites, Christians, and etc. Liberal Jews bitch about Trump's 'Islamophobia' while filling the airwaves and movie screens with anti-Arab tropes that depict Muslims as little more than crazed terrorists. Too Many Blacks in sports or entertainment is never a problem, but Too Many Asians in certain academies in NY is a huge problem to progracists. Progracists laugh, talk, and act like rednecks of old in their mindless progotry that would have us believe that they are more 'woke' because they worship a penis into the bung, penis cut off to make for fake 'vagina', or black supremacist emasculation of whitey. As for Jews, they see white women as sexual commodities that exist to be bought and sold among Jews, blacks, and non-whites than loyal members of the White Racial Family as wives and mothers. Jewish-run BBC promote the New 'Idealatry' of Black Male and White Female. And, Jews regard white men as just mercenaries to be used and expended in Wars for Israel, that is white men insist on being manly. For other white men, cuckery is the only option. Jews promote Miley Cyrus-ism and ACOWW to white girls. White males are supposed to cuck before black guys; the only way they can be manly is by putting on army boots and fighting the nations and peoples hated by Jews. Jews look upon white men as dogs. Like John McCain, they may bark and bite at Iran and Russia(or anyone hated by Jews), but they mustn't ever bark at the Jewish master. If they do, they are to be muzzled. Fight the Muzzie over there and be Muzzled over here. The Muzzie-Muzzle Decree. Anyway, Jews say it's 'supremacist' for whites to believe that it's okay to be white. Whites must be submissivist to Jewish supremacist. White men exist to cuck to Jews. White women exist to offer their wombs to black seed. White lands exist to be colonized by blacks, Muslims, Hindus, yellows, browns, etc. White wealth exist to be squeezed mostly by Jews and their Diversity allies. Even white history doesn't belong to whites. Ancient Greece, Middle Ages, Renaissance, and European History were never white but belong equally to all other races. Yeah, Amazonian Indians, Japanese, and African Bushmen had a huge role in the development of France and Britain!
Progracism isn't about racial equality but merely replaces old hierarchies with new ones where some groups are more equal than others. And the biggest progracists are Jews who, while endlessly denouncing white supremacism, demand that Jewish supremacism never be questioned and that all Americans must support Zionists over Palestinians. Google Jews and Youtube Jews bitch about 'hate' but they work hand-in-glove with Zionist killers, tyrants, and terrorists. And they work with Deep State to spread hate news and hate mania against Russia, Iran, Syria, and White Christians. And what is globo-homomania but a hate campaign against normality, decency, morality, nature, health, balance, and sense. It's one thing to tolerate homos and trannies and let them do their thing, but it's quite another to compel the whole world to participate in the worship of homo fecal penetration painted with rainbow colors.
It's not enough for truth-tellers to defend Free Speech as such a position is morally defensive. After all, free speech can allow good speech and bad speech, some of it gross and vile. What white national liberationists must do is demand the right of True Speech. They need the freedom to speak truth to power. And as offense is the best defense, they should call for banning of Zionist speech as hate speech against Palestinians and other Arabs/Muslims. They should call for banning of hateful conspiracy theories against Russia and Iran. Russia Collusion was a fantasy of Deep State and Jewish Media. And all this nonsense about Iran being a year away from having the Bomb and planning to wipe Israel off the map is defamation and conspiracy theorizing by Netanyahu and AIPAC. Only when Jews are put on the moral defensive and fear for their own speech will they value free speech for all.
